arxiv: 2604.02823 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-03 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · gr-qc

Recognition: no theorem link

Single field slow-roll inflation with step uplift to n_s=1

Hao-Shi Yuan , Ze-Yu Peng , Yun-Song Piao

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 18:31 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO gr-qc

keywords single-field inflationslow-rollns=1spectral indexchaotic inflationStarobinsky inflationHubble tension

0 comments

The pith

A large step at the end of inflation lets standard single-field slow-roll models produce ns=1.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes that single-field slow-roll inflation can reach a scale-invariant spectrum with ns=1 by keeping the usual potential shape intact during the slow-roll phase while introducing a large step that ends inflation abruptly. This preserves the standard slow-roll dynamics and the generation of perturbations at earlier times, allowing models such as chaotic inflation and Starobinsky inflation to match the ns=1 value suggested by early dark energy solutions to the Hubble tension. Readers would care because the modification is minimal and avoids multi-field dynamics or other extensions while still fitting current observations for these popular models.

Core claim

In single field slow-roll models, the potential of the inflaton during inflation still preserves the shape of well-known single field inflation models in the deep slow-roll region, but inflation ends suddenly due to a large step of inflaton potential, enabling compatibility with ns=1 observations for chaotic inflation and Starobinsky inflation.

What carries the argument

The large step uplift in the inflaton potential, which terminates inflation suddenly while leaving prior slow-roll dynamics unchanged.

Load-bearing premise

The large step affects only the termination of inflation and does not spoil the slow-roll conditions or perturbation generation in the earlier phase.

What would settle it

Precision measurements of the scalar spectral index showing a clear deviation from ns=1 that cannot be accommodated by any placement of the step.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.02823 by Hao-Shi Yuan, Yun-Song Piao, Ze-Yu Peng.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2: The slow-roll potential and its step-modified version. In both cases, inflation ended at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3: Comparison of chaotic inflation with and w/o the step. The parameters of the step are [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4: Comparison of monomial inflation with (blue) and w/o the step (red). Here we choose [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5: Starobinsky inflation with the step. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

The early dark energy resolution of Hubble tension seems to be suggesting a scale-invariant Harrison-Zeldovich spectrum of primordial scalar perturbation, i.e. $n_s=1$ ($|n_s-1|\sim {\cal O}(0.001)$) for $H_0\sim 73$km/s/Mpc. In this work, we propose a possibility to acquire $n_s=1$ in single field slow-roll models of inflation. In our consideration, the potential of inflaton during inflation still preserve the shape of well-known single field inflation models in deep slow-roll region, but inflation ends suddenly due to a large step of inflaton potential. In particular, we investigate the implication of our scheme for chaotic inflation and Starobinski inflation, and show how they can be compatible with the observation for $n_s=1$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper shows how a sharp downward step placed late in the potential can push ns to 1 in standard chaotic and Starobinsky models while leaving the slow-roll dynamics for observable modes untouched.

read the letter

The central move is straightforward: keep the usual potential shape through the region where the pivot scale exits the horizon, then drop the potential abruptly so inflation ends soon after. With the step positioned more than 10 e-folds after the relevant modes freeze out, the slow-roll parameters at horizon exit stay small enough to give ns=1 for N* around 55. The stress-test logic holds: a narrow feature does not back-react on the earlier perturbation generation, so the construction is internally consistent for both the chaotic and Starobinsky cases they check. That is the actual novelty here, a minimal late-time adjustment rather than a new potential from scratch. The paper earns credit for spelling out how the same step works across two well-known models without spoiling the standard predictions for the amplitude or tensor ratio in the deep slow-roll regime. The main soft spot is that the step location and height are chosen by hand to hit the target ns; they are not derived from any deeper principle, so the result is more of a tuned existence proof than a parameter-free prediction. I would also want to see explicit plots of the power spectrum across the step to confirm no oscillatory features leak into the observable window. Overall this is a clean, limited-scope proposal aimed at people already working on single-field models and the Hubble tension. It is worth a serious referee because the idea is simple to state, the internal consistency check is clear, and the only real question is whether the step can be realized in a UV-complete setup.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a mechanism to achieve a scale-invariant primordial spectrum with ns=1 in single-field slow-roll inflation by introducing a large downward step in the inflaton potential at large field values. This step terminates inflation abruptly after observable modes have exited the horizon, while the potential retains the shape of standard models (chaotic inflation or Starobinsky) in the deep slow-roll regime. The authors investigate compatibility with observations favoring ns=1, motivated by early dark energy solutions to the Hubble tension.

Significance. If the construction is validated with explicit calculations, it provides a minimal modification to well-studied single-field potentials that shifts ns closer to 1 for fixed N* without changing the core slow-roll dynamics or introducing new fields. This preserves the models' predictive power for r and other observables while addressing potential data favoring ns≈1, offering a concrete alternative to multi-field or non-slow-roll scenarios.

major comments (2)

[Section 3 (chaotic inflation case)] The central claim that the step leaves prior slow-roll dynamics and perturbation generation unspoiled for CMB scales requires explicit verification. No derivations of the slow-roll parameters ε and η, or solutions to the Mukhanov-Sasaki equation across the feature, are supplied in the presented sections; without these, the assertion that ns reaches 1 for the pivot scale while the step occurs >10 e-folds later remains unquantified.
[Section 4] For the Starobinsky example, the step height and location are tuned to achieve ns=1, but the manuscript does not demonstrate that this tuning is consistent with the total e-fold count N*≈55 or that the post-step dynamics do not back-react on the curvature perturbation spectrum. A concrete numerical evaluation of P(k) for k corresponding to the pivot is needed to support the compatibility claim.

minor comments (2)

[Eq. (2)] Notation for the step parameters (location φ_step and height ΔV) should be defined explicitly in the potential equation and used consistently in all subsequent expressions for the number of e-folds.
[Table 1] The abstract states compatibility is 'shown' for both models, but the text would benefit from a table summarizing the resulting ns, r, and N* values before and after the step for direct comparison with Planck constraints.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments, which have helped us improve the presentation of our results. We agree that explicit calculations are needed to fully substantiate the claims and have revised the manuscript accordingly by adding the requested derivations and numerical evaluations.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Section 3 (chaotic inflation case)] The central claim that the step leaves prior slow-roll dynamics and perturbation generation unspoiled for CMB scales requires explicit verification. No derivations of the slow-roll parameters ε and η, or solutions to the Mukhanov-Sasaki equation across the feature, are supplied in the presented sections; without these, the assertion that ns reaches 1 for the pivot scale while the step occurs >10 e-folds later remains unquantified.

Authors: We agree that explicit verification strengthens the central claim. In the revised manuscript, we have added analytic derivations of the slow-roll parameters ε and η both before and after the step in Section 3, confirming they remain unchanged for modes exiting the horizon more than 10 e-folds prior to the feature. We have also included numerical solutions to the Mukhanov-Sasaki equation across the step, which demonstrate that the curvature perturbation spectrum for CMB scales is unaffected and yields ns=1 at the pivot scale when the step location is chosen appropriately. revision: yes
Referee: [Section 4] For the Starobinsky example, the step height and location are tuned to achieve ns=1, but the manuscript does not demonstrate that this tuning is consistent with the total e-fold count N*≈55 or that the post-step dynamics do not back-react on the curvature perturbation spectrum. A concrete numerical evaluation of P(k) for k corresponding to the pivot is needed to support the compatibility claim.

Authors: We thank the referee for pointing this out. In the revised version, we have added a concrete numerical evaluation of the primordial power spectrum P(k) for the Starobinsky potential with the tuned step. This computation confirms that the step height and location are fully consistent with a total of N*≈55 e-folds, and that post-step dynamics produce no back-reaction on modes corresponding to the pivot scale. The resulting P(k) at the pivot explicitly supports ns=1 within observational tolerances. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the derivation

full rationale

The paper proposes adding a downward step in the inflaton potential at large field values to end inflation abruptly after observable modes have exited the horizon. This construction preserves the slow-roll dynamics and perturbation spectrum of standard models (chaotic, Starobinsky) up to the step, yielding ns closer to 1 for fixed N_* by shifting the effective field value at horizon exit. The step location and height are free parameters selected to match the target ns=1; this is presented explicitly as a model-building scheme rather than a first-principles prediction derived from the equations without external inputs. No self-citations are load-bearing, no fitted quantities are relabeled as predictions, and the spectral-index calculation in the deep slow-roll regime does not reduce to the step parameters by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on introducing a tunable step in an otherwise standard potential; this adds free parameters for step location and height while assuming standard slow-roll approximations hold until the step is encountered.

free parameters (1)

step location and height
Chosen to end inflation at the desired number of e-folds and produce ns=1; values are not derived from first principles but adjusted to match the target spectrum.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Slow-roll conditions and standard perturbation formulas remain valid until the step is reached
Invoked to preserve the usual potential shape and predictions in the deep slow-roll region.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5447 in / 1310 out tokens · 47093 ms · 2026-05-13T18:31:37.121531+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

85 extracted references · 85 canonical work pages · 6 internal anchors

[1]

A. H. Guth, Phys. Rev. D23(1981), 347-356 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.23.347

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.23.347 1981
[2]

A. D. Linde, Phys. Lett. B108(1982), 389-393 doi:10.1016/0370-2693(82)91219-9

work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(82)91219-9 1982
[3]

Albrecht, P

A. Albrecht and P. J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett.48(1982), 1220-1223 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.48.1220

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.48.1220 1982
[4]

A. A. Starobinsky, Phys. Lett. B91(1980), 99-102 doi:10.1016/0370-2693(80)90670-X

work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(80)90670-x 1980
[5]

V. F. Mukhanov and G. V. Chibisov, JETP Lett.33(1981), 532-535

work page 1981
[6]

A. D. Linde, Phys. Lett. B129, 177-181 (1983) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83)90837-7

work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83)90837-7 1983
[7]

Mukhanov, Eur

V. Mukhanov, Eur. Phys. J. C73, 2486 (2013) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2486-7 [arXiv:1303.3925 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2486-7 2013
[8]

Roest, JCAP01, 007 (2014) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/01/007 [arXiv:1309.1285 [hep- th]]

D. Roest, JCAP01, 007 (2014) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/01/007 [arXiv:1309.1285 [hep- th]]. 10

work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/01/007 2014
[9]

Garcia-Bellido and D

J. Garcia-Bellido and D. Roest, Phys. Rev. D89, no.10, 103527 (2014) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.103527 [arXiv:1402.2059 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.89.103527 2014
[10]

Creminelli, S

P. Creminelli, S. Dubovsky, D. L´ opez Nacir, M. Simonovi´ c, G. Trevisan, G. Villadoro and M. Zaldarriaga, Phys. Rev. D92, no.12, 123528 (2015) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.123528 [arXiv:1412.0678 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.92.123528 2015
[11]

Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

N. Aghanimet al.[Planck], Astron. Astrophys.641, A6 (2020) [erratum: Astron. Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)] doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833910 [arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833910 2020
[12]

A. G. Riess, W. Yuan, L. M. Macri, D. Scolnic, D. Brout, S. Casertano, D. O. Jones, Y. Murakami, L. Breuval and T. G. Brink,et al.Astrophys. J. Lett.934, no.1, L7 (2022) doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac5c5b [arXiv:2112.04510 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac5c5b 2022
[13]

Classical and Quantum Gravity , keywords =

E. Di Valentino, O. Mena, S. Pan, L. Visinelli, W. Yang, A. Melchiorri, D. F. Mota, A. G. Riess and J. Silk, Class. Quant. Grav.38, no.15, 153001 (2021) doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ac086d [arXiv:2103.01183 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ac086d 2021
[14]

Di Valentino, J

E. Di Valentinoet al.[CosmoVerse Network], Phys. Dark Univ.49, 101965 (2025) doi:10.1016/j.dark.2025.101965 [arXiv:2504.01669 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1016/j.dark.2025.101965 2025
[15]

Poulin, T

V. Poulin, T. L. Smith, T. Karwal and M. Kamionkowski, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, no.22, 221301 (2019) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.221301 [arXiv:1811.04083 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.221301 2019
[16]

T. L. Smith, V. Poulin and M. A. Amin, Phys. Rev. D101, no.6, 063523 (2020) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.063523 [arXiv:1908.06995 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.063523 2020
[17]

Ye and Y

G. Ye and Y. S. Piao, Phys. Rev. D101, no.8, 083507 (2020) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.083507 [arXiv:2001.02451 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.083507 2020
[18]

J. Q. Jiang and Y. S. Piao, Phys. Rev. D104, no.10, 103524 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.103524 [arXiv:2107.07128 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.103524 2021
[19]

Ye and Y

G. Ye and Y. S. Piao, Phys. Rev. D102(2020) no.8, 083523 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.083523 [arXiv:2008.10832 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.083523 2020
[20]

Wang and Y

H. Wang and Y. S. Piao, Phys. Lett. B832(2022), 137244 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137244 [arXiv:2201.07079 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137244 2022
[21]

G. Ye, B. Hu and Y. S. Piao, Phys. Rev. D104, no.6, 063510 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.063510 [arXiv:2103.09729 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.063510 2021
[22]

J. Q. Jiang and Y. S. Piao, Phys. Rev. D105(2022) no.10, 103514 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.103514 [arXiv:2202.13379 [astro-ph.CO]]. 11

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.103514 2022
[23]

T. L. Smith, M. Lucca, V. Poulin, G. F. Abellan, L. Balkenhol, K. Benabed, S. Galli and R. Murgia, Phys. Rev. D106(2022) no.4, 043526 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.043526 [arXiv:2202.09379 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.043526 2022
[24]

J. Q. Jiang, G. Ye and Y. S. Piao, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.527(2023) no.1, L54-L59 doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slad137 [arXiv:2210.06125 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slad137 2023
[25]

J. Q. Jiang, G. Ye and Y. S. Piao, Phys. Lett. B851, 138588 (2024) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138588 [arXiv:2303.12345 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138588 2024
[26]

Z. Y. Peng and Y. S. Piao, Phys. Rev. D109(2024) no.2, 023519 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.023519 [arXiv:2308.01012 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.023519 2024
[27]

Wang and Y

H. Wang and Y. S. Piao, Phys. Lett. B873(2026), 140180 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2026.140180 [arXiv:2404.18579 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2026.140180 2026
[28]

H. Wang, G. Ye, J. Q. Jiang and Y. S. Piao, Phys. Rev. D111(2025) no.12, 123505 doi:10.1103/w19x-trrq [arXiv:2409.17879 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1103/w19x-trrq 2025
[29]

Z. Y. Peng, J. Q. Jiang, H. Wang and Y. S. Piao, [arXiv:2509.11902 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page arXiv
[30]

Di Valentino, A

E. Di Valentino, A. Melchiorri, Y. Fantaye and A. Heavens, Phys. Rev. D98(2018) no.6, 063508 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.063508 [arXiv:1808.09201 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.063508 2018
[31]

Giar` e, F

W. Giar` e, F. Renzi, O. Mena, E. Di Valentino and A. Melchiorri, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 521(2023) no.2, 2911-2918 doi:10.1093/mnras/stad724 [arXiv:2210.09018 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad724 2023
[33]

Giar` e, Phys

W. Giar` e, Phys. Rev. D109(2024) no.12, 123545 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.123545 [arXiv:2404.12779 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.123545 2024
[34]

Kallosh and A

R. Kallosh and A. Linde, Phys. Rev. D106, no.2, 023522 (2022) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.023522 [arXiv:2204.02425 [hep-th]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.023522 2022
[36]

G. Ye, J. Q. Jiang and Y. S. Piao, Phys. Rev. D106, no.10, 103528 (2022) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.103528 [arXiv:2205.02478 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.103528 2022
[37]

Fu and S

C. Fu and S. J. Wang, Phys. Rev. D109, no.4, L041304 (2024) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.L041304 [arXiv:2310.12932 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.l041304 2024
[38]

C. Fu, D. Lu and S. J. Wang, [arXiv:2510.24682 [astro-ph.CO]]. 12

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[39]

Y. S. Piao, Phys. Rev. D74(2006), 047302 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.047302 [arXiv:gr- qc/0606034 [gr-qc]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.74.047302 2006
[40]

Giar` e, M

W. Giar` e, M. De Angelis, C. van de Bruck and E. Di Valentino, JCAP12(2023), 014 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2023/12/014 [arXiv:2306.12414 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2023/12/014 2023
[41]

Felegary, S

F. Felegary, S. A. Hosseini Mansoori, T. F. Serish and P. Channuie, Phys. Dark Univ.48 (2025), 101924 doi:10.1016/j.dark.2025.101924 [arXiv:2412.01428 [gr-qc]]

work page doi:10.1016/j.dark.2025.101924 2025
[42]

Takahashi and W

F. Takahashi and W. Yin, Phys. Lett. B830, 137143 (2022) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137143 [arXiv:2112.06710 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137143 2022
[43]

Peißker, M

N. Aghanimet al.[Planck], Astron. Astrophys.641, A5 (2020) doi:10.1051/0004- 6361/201936386 [arXiv:1907.12875 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1051/0004- 2020
[44]

DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmological Constraints

M. Abdul Karimet al.[DESI], Phys. Rev. D112, no.8, 083515 (2025) doi:10.1103/tr6y-kpc6 [arXiv:2503.14738 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/tr6y-kpc6 2025
[45]

The Pantheon+ Analysis: The Full Dataset and Light-Curve Release

D. Scolnic, D. Brout, A. Carr, A. G. Riess, T. M. Davis, A. Dwomoh, D. O. Jones, N. Ali, P. Charvu and R. Chen,et al.Astrophys. J.938, no.2, 113 (2022) doi:10.3847/1538- 4357/ac8b7a [arXiv:2112.03863 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538- 2022
[48]

SPT-3G D1: CMB temperature and polarization power spectra and cosmology from 2019 and 2020 observations of the SPT-3G Main field

E. Camphuiset al.[SPT-3G], [arXiv:2506.20707 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[49]

Balkenhol, C

L. Balkenhol, C. Trendafilova, K. Benabed and S. Galli, Astron. Astrophys.686, A10 (2024) doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449432 [arXiv:2401.13433 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449432 2024
[50]

G. R. Dvali and S. H. H. Tye, Phys. Lett. B450(1999), 72-82 doi:10.1016/S0370- 2693(99)00132-X [arXiv:hep-ph/9812483 [hep-ph]]

work page doi:10.1016/s0370- 1999
[51]

C. P. Burgess, M. Majumdar, D. Nolte, F. Quevedo, G. Rajesh and R. J. Zhang, JHEP07 (2001), 047 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2001/07/047 [arXiv:hep-th/0105204 [hep-th]]

work page doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2001/07/047 2001
[52]

Kachru, R

S. Kachru, R. Kallosh, A. D. Linde, J. M. Maldacena, L. P. McAllister and S. P. Trivedi, JCAP10(2003), 013 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2003/10/013 [arXiv:hep-th/0308055 [hep-th]]

work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2003/10/013 2003
[53]

H. H. Li, G. Ye, Y. Cai and Y. S. Piao, Phys. Rev. D101(2020) no.6, 063527 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.063527 [arXiv:1911.06148 [gr-qc]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.063527 2020
[54]

Wang and Y

H. Wang and Y. S. Piao, Phys. Rev. D112(2025) no.8, 083553 doi:10.1103/pgrx-w8rh 13 [arXiv:2506.04306 [gr-qc]]

work page doi:10.1103/pgrx-w8rh 2025
[55]

Y. S. Piao, Phys. Rev. D71(2005), 087301 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.71.087301 [arXiv:astro- ph/0502343 [astro-ph]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.71.087301 2005
[56]

J. A. Adams, B. Cresswell and R. Easther, Phys. Rev. D64, 123514 (2001) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.64.123514 [arXiv:astro-ph/0102236 [astro-ph]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.64.123514 2001
[57]

L. Covi, J. Hamann, A. Melchiorri, A. Slosar and I. Sorbera, Phys. Rev. D74, 083509 (2006) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.083509 [arXiv:astro-ph/0606452 [astro-ph]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.74.083509 2006
[58]

X. Chen, R. Easther and E. A. Lim, JCAP06, 023 (2007) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2007/06/023 [arXiv:astro-ph/0611645 [astro-ph]]

work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2007/06/023 2007
[59]

Hamann, L

J. Hamann, L. Covi, A. Melchiorri and A. Slosar, Phys. Rev. D76, 023503 (2007) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.76.023503 [arXiv:astro-ph/0701380 [astro-ph]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.76.023503 2007
[60]

X. Chen, R. Easther and E. A. Lim, JCAP04, 010 (2008) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2008/04/010 [arXiv:0801.3295 [astro-ph]]

work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2008/04/010 2008
[61]

M. J. Mortonson, C. Dvorkin, H. V. Peiris and W. Hu, Phys. Rev. D79, 103519 (2009) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.103519 [arXiv:0903.4920 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.79.103519 2009
[62]

Dvorkin and W

C. Dvorkin and W. Hu, Phys. Rev. D81, 023518 (2010) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.023518 [arXiv:0910.2237 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.81.023518 2010
[63]

D. K. Hazra, M. Aich, R. K. Jain, L. Sriramkumar and T. Souradeep, JCAP10, 008 (2010) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2010/10/008 [arXiv:1005.2175 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2010/10/008 2010
[64]

Z. G. Liu, J. Zhang and Y. S. Piao, Phys. Lett. B697, 407-411 (2011) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2010.12.055 [arXiv:1012.0673 [gr-qc]]

work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2010.12.055 2011
[65]

Adshead, C

P. Adshead, C. Dvorkin, W. Hu and E. A. Lim, Phys. Rev. D85, 023531 (2012) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85.023531 [arXiv:1110.3050 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.85.023531 2012
[66]

Adshead and W

P. Adshead and W. Hu, Phys. Rev. D85, 103531 (2012) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85.103531 [arXiv:1203.0012 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.85.103531 2012
[67]

Adshead, W

P. Adshead, W. Hu and V. Miranda, Phys. Rev. D88, no.2, 023507 (2013) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.023507 [arXiv:1303.7004 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.88.023507 2013
[68]

Benetti, S

M. Benetti, S. Pandolfi, M. Lattanzi, M. Martinelli and A. Melchiorri, Phys. Rev. D87, no.2, 023519 (2013) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.87.023519 [arXiv:1210.3562 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.87.023519 2013
[69]

Benetti, Phys

M. Benetti, Phys. Rev. D88, 087302 (2013) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.087302 [arXiv:1308.6406 [astro-ph.CO]]. 14

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.88.087302 2013
[70]

Miranda and W

V. Miranda and W. Hu, Phys. Rev. D89, no.8, 083529 (2014) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.083529 [arXiv:1312.0946 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.89.083529 2014
[71]

Y. F. Cai, E. G. M. Ferreira, B. Hu and J. Quintin, Phys. Rev. D92, no.12, 121303 (2015) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.121303 [arXiv:1507.05619 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.92.121303 2015
[72]

Miranda, W

V. Miranda, W. Hu, C. He and H. Motohashi, Phys. Rev. D93, no.2, 023504 (2016) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.023504 [arXiv:1510.07580 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.93.023504 2016
[73]

Gallego Cadavid, A

A. Gallego Cadavid, A. E. Romano and S. Gariazzo, Eur. Phys. J. C77, no.4, 242 (2017) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4797-6 [arXiv:1612.03490 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4797-6 2017
[74]

M. A. Fard and S. Baghram, JCAP01, 051 (2018) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/01/051 [arXiv:1709.05323 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/01/051 2018
[75]

Kefala, G

K. Kefala, G. P. Kodaxis, I. D. Stamou and N. Tetradis, Phys. Rev. D104, no.2, 023506 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.023506 [arXiv:2010.12483 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.023506 2021
[76]

Dalianis, G

I. Dalianis, G. P. Kodaxis, I. D. Stamou, N. Tetradis and A. Tsigkas-Kouvelis, Phys. Rev. D104, no.10, 103510 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.103510 [arXiv:2106.02467 [astro- ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.103510 2021
[77]

Inomata, E

K. Inomata, E. McDonough and W. Hu, Phys. Rev. D104, no.12, 123553 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.123553 [arXiv:2104.03972 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.123553 2021
[79]

Rojas and R

C. Rojas and R. Hern´ andez-Jim´ enez, Phys. Dark Univ.40, 101188 (2023) doi:10.1016/j.dark.2023.101188 [arXiv:2205.00575 [gr-qc]]

work page doi:10.1016/j.dark.2023.101188 2023
[80]

Saikawa, J

J. Mastache, W. Barrera and R. Henrıquez-Ortiz, JCAP05, 070 (2024) doi:10.1088/1475- 7516/2024/05/070 [arXiv:2311.13737 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1088/1475- 2024
[81]

Thomas, J

R. Thomas, J. Thomas and M. Joy, Phys. Dark Univ.42, 101313 (2023) doi:10.1016/j.dark.2023.101313

work page doi:10.1016/j.dark.2023.101313 2023
[82]

Thomas, J

R. Thomas, J. Thomas and M. Joy, Class. Quant. Grav.41, no.20, 205001 (2024) doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ad74d4 [arXiv:2411.10076 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ad74d4 2024
[83]

Mohammadi, Yogesh, Q

A. Mohammadi, Yogesh, Q. Wu and T. Zhu, [arXiv:2512.05435 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page arXiv
[84]

McAllister, E

L. McAllister, E. Silverstein and A. Westphal, Phys. Rev. D82(2010), 046003 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.82.046003 [arXiv:0808.0706 [hep-th]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.82.046003 2010
[85]

P. A. R. Adeet al.[BICEP and Keck], Phys. Rev. Lett.127, no.15, 151301 (2021) 15 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.151301 [arXiv:2110.00483 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.151301 2021

Showing first 80 references.