arxiv: 2604.02907 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-03 · ❄️ cond-mat.soft · cond-mat.stat-mech

The Countoscope for self-propelled particles

Tristan Cerdin , Talia Calazans , Carine Douarche , Sophie Marbach This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 18:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.soft cond-mat.stat-mech

keywords countoscopeactive particlesnumber fluctuationsself-propelled particlesintermediate scattering functionmean squared displacementactive Brownian particlesrun and tumble particles

0 comments p. Extension

The pith

The Countoscope quantifies self-propelled particle dynamics through number fluctuations in virtual observation boxes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper extends the Countoscope, which measures particle number fluctuations in fixed boxes, to active self-propelled particles including active Brownian particles, run-and-tumble particles, and active Ornstein-Uhlenbeck particles. For the latter, Gaussian statistics yield a general formula for any such system, while for the former two, a perturbative expansion derives the intermediate scattering function and number correlations. The resulting mean-squared number difference shows three scaling regimes—diffusive, advective, and long-time enhanced diffusive—that match simulations and reflect the particles' mean squared displacements. This matters for high-density systems where tracking individuals is impractical, as it allows extracting self-propulsion properties from fluctuations alone.

Core claim

The Countoscope applied to self-propelled particles yields theoretical predictions for the mean-squared number difference that match stochastic simulations and display three time-dependent scaling regimes—diffusive, advective, and long-time enhanced diffusive—reflecting the regimes of the mean squared particle displacement, with limiting laws in each regime useful for quantifying self-propulsion properties.

What carries the argument

the intermediate scattering function derived via perturbative expansion over probability density fields for ABPs and RTPs, or Gaussian statistics for AOUPs, to obtain correlations of the particle number N(t) in observation boxes

If this is right

The mean-squared number difference exhibits three scaling regimes mirroring those of particle displacements.
Limiting laws in each regime provide ways to quantify self-propulsion from fluctuation measurements.
The approach applies to any Gaussian system through the AOUP-derived formula.
Predictions are validated against stochastic simulations for the three particle types.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

This method could be tested on experimental images of dense active matter where particle tracking fails due to crowding.
Similar fluctuation analysis might connect to measuring effective temperatures or activity levels in other non-equilibrium systems.
Extensions to interacting particles could show how interactions modify the scaling regimes.

Load-bearing premise

The perturbative expansion over probability density fields for active Brownian and run-and-tumble particles remains accurate at the densities and persistence lengths studied.

What would settle it

If stochastic simulations or experiments show that the mean-squared number difference fails to exhibit the three predicted scaling regimes matching the mean squared particle displacement, the theoretical extension would be invalidated.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.02907 by Carine Douarche, Sophie Marbach, Talia Calazans, Tristan Cerdin.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Probing number fluctuations “Countoscope” approach where we probe the number of particles in virtual observation boxes of an image/simulation. ⟨∆N2 (t)⟩ can be put in parallel, for particle numbers, to the Mean Squared Displacement (MSD) ⟨∆r 2 (t)⟩ = ⟨|r(t)−r(0)| 2 ⟩, where r(t) refers to a particle’s position at time t. We will refer throughout this article to ⟨∆N2 (t)⟩ as the Number Mean Squared Differen… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Intermediate Scattering Functions for Active Brownian Particles (top), and Run-and-Tumble particles (bottom) obtained at different orders in the truncation. k size are taken to be the same for all three plots and go from small length scales (in light colors) to large ones (in dark colors). Dynamic parameters are v = 5 µm s−1 , Dt = 0.1 µm2 s −1 , and Dr = 1 s−1 . For order 5/Exact, in the top ABP graph the… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Intermediate Scattering Function of Active Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Particles. The dynamic parameters used are equivalent to the ones in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: NMSD behavior for Run-and-Tumble particles. (a) NMSD behavior with respect to lag time for increasing box sizes going from yellow to brown; (b) same as (a) but where time is rescaled by a typical diffusion timescale L 2 /Deff and the NMSD by ⟨N⟩, and (c) same as (b) but where time is rescaled by a typical advection time L/v. In all of the plots, stars correspond to numerical simulations and lines to the th… view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Probability distribution from geometric arguments. Schematics (a) illustrating the probability distribution clouds to find an advective particle in a box after some time t (yellow) given it started in the box initially (blue). Probability distribution of ABPs or RTPs to remain in the box they start in (b) obtained from simulation against ones obtained from geometric arguments in the advective case. Simu… view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Number fluctuations for Run-and-tumble particles at different P´eclet numbers. (Top row) Number correlations CN (t) and (bottom row) NMSD, with v increasing from left to right, v = {1, 5, 10} µm s−1 corresponding to Pe ≃ {1.6, 8, 16}. All other dynamic parameters are kept constant at the same values as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Number correlations and NMSD for Run-and-tumble particles at different Orders in the truncation. Orders are increasing from left to right, with the rightmost column showing the exact expression in full lines and the Order 5 result in dotted lines. ABP RTP [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Value of the prefactor to the advective regime for ABPs (left) and RTPs (right) obtained from fitting the theory at different orders compared to the theoretical value of 8 π . RTPs, and hence one should use the exact formulation – which comes at no (if not at reduced) additional computational cost. c. Convergence of the limiting regimes We can quantify this increasing accuracy by investigating the limiti… view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Number correlations and NMSD for Active Brownian Particles at different Orders in the truncation. Order 2 Order 4 Order 6 / Exact [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_9.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: Number Correlations of Active Brownian Particles (top) and Run-and-tumble particles (bottom) at pair orders in the truncation. Orders are increasing from left to right, with the rightmost column for RTP showing the exact expression in full lines and the Order 6 result in dotted lines. Dynamic parameters are v = 10 µm s−1 , Dt = 0.1 µm2 s −1 , and Dr = 1 s−1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_10.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Particle number fluctuations $N(t)$, measured in virtual observation boxes of an image or a simulation, offer a way to quantify particle dynamics when particle tracking is impractical, such as in high-density systems. While traditionally limited to equilibrium diffusive systems, we extend this approach -- named ``Countoscope'' -- to out-of-equilibrium self-propelled particles: Active Brownian (ABPs), Run and Tumble (RTPs), and Active Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Particles (AOUPs). For AOUPs, we leverage their Gaussian statistics to derive a general formula applicable to any Gaussian system. For ABPs and RTPs, we derive the intermediate scattering function (ISF) -- and thus the correlations of $N(t)$ -- using an exact perturbative expansion over the probability density fields, revealing key physical features of the ISF and of the number correlations. Our theoretical predictions for the mean-squared number difference $\langle \Delta N^2(t) \rangle = \langle (N(t) - N(0))^2 \rangle$ match stochastic simulations and exhibit three time-dependent scaling regimes: diffusive, advective, and long-time enhanced diffusive, reflecting the regimes of the mean squared particle displacement. We further uncover limiting laws in each of these regimes that are useful to quantify self-propulsion properties.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This extends the Countoscope to ABPs, RTPs and AOUPs with derivations that produce three matching scaling regimes in number fluctuations, but the perturbative control at high density remains the open question.

read the letter

The main point is that the authors have worked out explicit expressions for number fluctuations in a fixed observation box for three standard active-particle models, and those expressions reproduce the expected diffusive-advective-enhanced-diffusive crossovers seen in the mean-squared displacement. They do this without introducing fit parameters, which is the practical advance for dense systems where tracking breaks down. For AOUPs the Gaussian property gives a closed formula right away. For ABPs and RTPs they use a perturbative expansion of the probability density to reach the intermediate scattering function and then the mean-squared number difference. The resulting limiting laws in each regime are written out clearly and could be used to read off speed or persistence time from fluctuation data alone. The direct comparison to stochastic simulations is the strongest evidence they present; the curves line up across the three regimes without obvious post-hoc adjustment. That match is real and useful within the active-matter community. The soft spot is the perturbative step for ABPs and RTPs. The paper treats the expansion as exact, yet at the higher densities and longer persistence lengths used in the simulations the neglected terms could shift the crossover times or the long-time exponent. No explicit convergence plot or residual estimate is described in the abstract, so a referee would need to see that check before accepting the scaling claims as robust. The work is aimed at people who already use fluctuation methods in soft or active matter and want a route around tracking. The derivations start from standard equations of motion, the simulations are independent, and the central claim is falsifiable, so the paper is coherent enough to deserve referee time rather than a desk reject.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces the Countoscope, a method to extract self-propulsion properties from number fluctuations N(t) in virtual observation boxes for active particles (ABPs, RTPs, AOUPs). For AOUPs it uses exact Gaussian statistics to obtain a general formula for the intermediate scattering function (ISF) and thus ⟨ΔN²(t)⟩; for ABPs and RTPs it employs an exact perturbative expansion over probability density fields. The resulting predictions exhibit three scaling regimes (diffusive, advective, long-time enhanced diffusive) that mirror the regimes of the mean-squared displacement, match stochastic simulations, and yield limiting laws for quantifying persistence and speed without particle tracking.

Significance. If the derivations and matching hold, the work supplies a parameter-free route to active-particle characterization from density fluctuations alone, extending equilibrium countoscope techniques to out-of-equilibrium systems and offering practical utility for dense or optically crowded experiments where tracking fails. The explicit limiting laws in each regime constitute a concrete, falsifiable advance.

major comments (2)

[§3] §3 (perturbative expansion for ABPs/RTPs): the manuscript asserts an exact expansion yet provides no truncation-error bounds or convergence diagnostics at the highest densities and longest persistence lengths used in the stochastic simulations (e.g., those underlying the scaling plots). If higher-order terms remain appreciable, the claimed clean reflection of MSD regimes in ⟨ΔN²(t)⟩ would be compromised.
[Fig. 4] Fig. 4 and associated text: quantitative agreement between theory and simulation is stated, but the error analysis (or lack thereof) for the perturbative truncation is not shown; a direct comparison of omitted-term magnitude versus the reported residuals would be required to substantiate the match across all three regimes.

minor comments (2)

The notation distinguishing the probability density fields for ABPs versus RTPs is introduced without an explicit comparison table; a short side-by-side definition would improve readability.
[Abstract] The abstract claims 'exact perturbative expansion' while the main text later refers to practical truncation; harmonizing this wording would remove ambiguity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive summary and for identifying points that will strengthen the presentation of the perturbative results. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§3] §3 (perturbative expansion for ABPs/RTPs): the manuscript asserts an exact expansion yet provides no truncation-error bounds or convergence diagnostics at the highest densities and longest persistence lengths used in the stochastic simulations (e.g., those underlying the scaling plots). If higher-order terms remain appreciable, the claimed clean reflection of MSD regimes in ⟨ΔN²(t)⟩ would be compromised.

Authors: The expansion is formally exact as a series in the probability density fields; the truncation is performed at linear order in the activity-induced perturbation for closed-form expressions. While the manuscript does not supply explicit remainder bounds, the quantitative match to simulations (including at the highest densities and longest persistence times shown) indicates that neglected terms remain small. In the revision we will add a short appendix that estimates the magnitude of the next-order contribution by direct comparison of first- and second-order truncations on a subset of the parameter space, thereby providing the requested convergence diagnostics. revision: yes
Referee: [Fig. 4] Fig. 4 and associated text: quantitative agreement between theory and simulation is stated, but the error analysis (or lack thereof) for the perturbative truncation is not shown; a direct comparison of omitted-term magnitude versus the reported residuals would be required to substantiate the match across all three regimes.

Authors: We agree that an explicit error analysis is needed to substantiate the claimed agreement. In the revised version we will augment Fig. 4 (or add a supplementary panel) with a direct comparison of the size of the omitted higher-order terms against the observed residuals between theory and simulation, for representative points in each of the three scaling regimes. This will be accompanied by a brief discussion of how the truncation error scales with density and persistence length. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivations start from standard model equations and produce independent predictions

full rationale

The paper derives the ISF and ⟨ΔN²(t)⟩ from the known equations of motion for ABPs, RTPs (via exact perturbative expansion over probability density fields) and AOUPs (via Gaussian statistics), without fitting parameters to the target number-fluctuation observable or invoking self-citations for load-bearing uniqueness. The reported scaling regimes emerge as consequences of the underlying particle dynamics rather than by construction; no quoted step reduces the final result to a renamed input or fitted subset. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard equations of motion for the three active-particle models plus the assumption that a perturbative expansion of the probability density fields converges to the intermediate scattering function. No free parameters are introduced to fit the number correlations; the Gaussian property for AOUPs is model-intrinsic.

axioms (2)

domain assumption The probability density fields for ABPs and RTPs admit a perturbative expansion whose truncation yields the intermediate scattering function.
Invoked when deriving the ISF for non-Gaussian active particles.
domain assumption AOUPs obey Gaussian statistics exactly.
Used to obtain the general formula for any Gaussian system.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5537 in / 1410 out tokens · 36125 ms · 2026-05-13T18:36:33.870179+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

For ABPs and RTPs, we derive the intermediate scattering function (ISF) ... using an exact perturbative expansion over the probability density fields ... continued fraction
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/DimensionForcing.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

three time-dependent scaling regimes: diffusive, advective, and long-time enhanced diffusive

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

Smoluchowski, Studien ¨ uber molekularstatistik von emulsionen und deren zusammenhang mit der brown’schen bewegung, Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien123, 2381 (1914)

M. Smoluchowski, Studien ¨ uber molekularstatistik von emulsionen und deren zusammenhang mit der brown’schen bewegung, Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien123, 2381 (1914)

work page 1914
[2]

M. von Smoluchowski, Uber die zeitliche ver¨ ander- lichkeit der gruppierung von emulsionsteilchen und die reversibilit¨ at der diffusionserscheinungen, Physikalische Zeitschrift16, 321 (1915)

work page 1915
[3]

M. v. Smoluchowski, Studien ¨ uber kolloidstatistik und den mechanismus der diffusion, Kolloid-Zeitschrift18, 48 (1916)

work page 1916
[4]

Chandrasekhar, Stochastic problems in physics and astronomy, Reviews of modern physics15, 1 (1943)

S. Chandrasekhar, Stochastic problems in physics and astronomy, Reviews of modern physics15, 1 (1943)

work page 1943
[5]

Westgren, Die veranderungsgeschwindigkeit der lokalen teilchenkonzentration in kolloiden systemen, i, Arkiv for Matematik, Astronomi och Fysik11, 1 (1916)

A. Westgren, Die veranderungsgeschwindigkeit der lokalen teilchenkonzentration in kolloiden systemen, i, Arkiv for Matematik, Astronomi och Fysik11, 1 (1916)

work page 1916
[6]

Westgren, Die veranderungsgeschwindigkeit der lokalen teilchenkonzentration in kolloiden systemen, ii, Arkiv for Matematik, Astronomi och Fysik13, 1 (1918)

A. Westgren, Die veranderungsgeschwindigkeit der lokalen teilchenkonzentration in kolloiden systemen, ii, Arkiv for Matematik, Astronomi och Fysik13, 1 (1918)

work page 1918
[7]

Lindley, The estimation of velocity distributions from counts, inProceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians(North-Holland Amsterdam, 1954) pp

D. Lindley, The estimation of velocity distributions from counts, inProceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians(North-Holland Amsterdam, 1954) pp. 427–444

work page 1954
[8]

Rothschild, A new method of measuring the activity of spermatozoa, Journal of Experimental Biology30, 178 (1953)

L. Rothschild, A new method of measuring the activity of spermatozoa, Journal of Experimental Biology30, 178 (1953)

work page 1953
[9]

Ruben, Generalised concentration fluctuations under diffusion equilibrium, Journal of Applied Probability1, 47 (1964)

H. Ruben, Generalised concentration fluctuations under diffusion equilibrium, Journal of Applied Probability1, 47 (1964)

work page 1964
[10]

Katz and H

D. Katz and H. Dott, Methods of measuring swimming speed of spermatozoa, Reproduction45, 263 (1975)

work page 1975
[11]

Culling, Estimation of the mean velocity of partic- ulate flows by counting, Earth Surface Processes and Landforms10, 569 (1985)

W. Culling, Estimation of the mean velocity of partic- ulate flows by counting, Earth Surface Processes and Landforms10, 569 (1985)

work page 1985
[12]

M. t. Vrugt, B. Liebchen, and M. E. Cates, What ex- actly is’ active matter’?, arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.21621 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[13]

Baker, R

F. Baker, R. Cragle, G. Salisbury, and N. VanDemark, Spermatozoan velocities in vitro. a simple method of measurement., Fertility & Sterility8, 149 (1957)

work page 1957
[14]

B. J. Berne and R. Pecora,Dynamic light scattering: with applications to chemistry, biology, and physics(Courier Corporation, 2000)

work page 2000
[15]

E. L. Elson and D. Magde, Fluorescence correlation spec- troscopy. i. conceptual basis and theory, Biopolymers: Original Research on Biomolecules13, 1 (1974)

work page 1974
[16]

G¨ unther, M

J.-P. G¨ unther, M. B¨ orsch, and P. Fischer, Diffusion mea- surements of swimming enzymes with fluorescence cor- relation spectroscopy, Accounts of chemical research51, 1911 (2018)

work page 1911
[17]

Santiago, Nanoscale active matter matters: Challenges and opportunities for self-propelled nanomotors, Nano Today19, 11 (2018)

I. Santiago, Nanoscale active matter matters: Challenges and opportunities for self-propelled nanomotors, Nano Today19, 11 (2018)

work page 2018
[18]

McGlasson and L

A. McGlasson and L. C. Bradley, Investigating time- dependent active motion of janus micromotors using dy- namic light scattering, Small17, 2104926 (2021)

work page 2021
[19]

E. K. Mackay, S. Marbach, B. Sprinkle, and A. L. Thor- neywork, The countoscope: measuring self and collective dynamics without trajectories, Physical Review X14, 041016 (2024)

work page 2024
[20]

Carter, E

A. Carter, E. K. Mackay, B. Sprinkle, A. L. Thorney- work, and S. Marbach, Measuring collective diffusion co- efficients by counting particles in boxes, Soft Matter21, 3991 (2025)

work page 2025
[21]

Martens, L

K. Martens, L. Angelani, R. Di Leonardo, and L. Boc- quet, Probability distributions for the run-and-tumble bacterial dynamics: An analogy to the lorentz model, The European Physical Journal E35, 84

work page
[22]

Kurzthaler, S

C. Kurzthaler, S. Leitmann, and T. Franosch, Intermedi- ate scattering function of an anisotropic active brownian particle, Scientific reports6, 36702 (2016)

work page 2016
[23]

Kurzthaler, Y

C. Kurzthaler, Y. Zhao, N. Zhou, J. Schwarz-Linek, C. Devailly, J. Arlt, J.-D. Huang, W. C. Poon, T. Fra- nosch, J. Tailleur,et al., Characterization and control of the run-and-tumble dynamics of escherichia coli, Physical Review Letters132, 038302 (2024)

work page 2024
[24]

Y. Zhao, C. Kurzthaler, N. Zhou, J. Schwarz-Linek, C. Devailly, J. Arlt, J.-D. Huang, W. C. Poon, T. Fra- nosch, V. A. Martinez,et al., Quantitative characteriza- tion of run-and-tumble statistics in bulk bacterial sus- pensions, Physical Review E109, 014612 (2024)

work page 2024
[25]

Martin, J

D. Martin, J. O’Byrne, M. E. Cates, E. Fodor, C. Nar- dini, J. Tailleur, and F. van Wijland, Statistical mechan- ics of active ornstein uhlenbeck particles, Physical Re- view E103, 032607, 2008.12972 [cond-mat]

work page arXiv 2008
[26]

Dinelli, J

A. Dinelli, J. O’Byrne, and J. Tailleur, Fluctuat- ing hydrodynamics of active particles interacting via chemotaxis and quorum sensing: static and dynamics, 2402.05072 [cond-mat]

work page arXiv
[27]

Gautry, M

T. Gautry, M. Deforet, and P. Illien, Closures of mo- ment expansion of anisotropic active brownian particles, 2509.26453 [cond-mat]

work page arXiv
[28]

A. P. Solon, M. E. Cates, and J. Tailleur, Active brown- ian particles and run-and-tumble particles: A compara- tive study, The European Physical Journal Special Topics 224, 1231 (2015)

work page 2015
[29]

Nelson,The Penguin dictionary of mathematics(Pen- guin UK, 2008)

D. Nelson,The Penguin dictionary of mathematics(Pen- guin UK, 2008)

work page 2008
[30]

E. K. Mackay, A. D. Young, A. Carter, S. Marbach, and A. L. Thorneywork, Collective hard core interactions leave multiscale signatures in number fluctuation spectra, arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.17476 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[31]

Chandrasekhar, Stochastic problems in physics and astronomy, Reviews of Modern Physics15, 1 (1949)

S. Chandrasekhar, Stochastic problems in physics and astronomy, Reviews of Modern Physics15, 1 (1949)

work page 1949
[32]

H. C. Berg, ed.,E. coli in Motion, Biological and Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering (Springer, New York, NY, 2004)

work page 2004
[33]

Clement, A

E. Clement, A. Lindner, C. Douarche, and H. Auradou, Bacterial suspensions under flow, The European Physical Journal Special Topics225, 2389 (2016)

work page 2016
[34]

Polin, I

M. Polin, I. Tuval, K. Drescher, J. P. Gollub, and R. E. Goldstein, Chlamydomonas swims with two ”gears” in a eukaryotic version of run-and-tumble locomotion, Science 325, 487 (2009)

work page 2009
[35]

Kurzthaler, C

C. Kurzthaler, C. Devailly, J. Arlt, T. Franosch, W. C. Poon, V. A. Martinez, and A. T. Brown, Probing the spatiotemporal dynamics of catalytic janus particles with single-particle tracking and differential dynamic mi- croscopy, Physical review letters121, 078001 (2018)

work page 2018
[36]

Poncet, O

A. Poncet, O. B´ enichou, V. D´ emery, and D. Nishiguchi, Pair correlation of dilute active Brownian particles: From low-activity dipolar correction to high-activity algebraic 19 depletion wings, Physical Review E103, 012605 (2021)

work page 2021
[37]

A. R. Sprenger, M. A. Fernandez-Rodriguez, L. Alvarez, L. Isa, R. Wittkowski, and H. L¨ owen, Active Brown- ian Motion with Orientation-Dependent Motility: The- ory and Experiments, Langmuir36, 7066 (2020)

work page 2020
[38]

M. A. Fernandez-Rodriguez, F. Grillo, L. Alvarez, M. Rathlef, I. Buttinoni, G. Volpe, and L. Isa, Feedback- controlled active brownian colloids with space-dependent rotational dynamics, Nature Communications11, 4223

work page
[39]

J. R. Howse, R. A. L. Jones, A. J. Ryan, T. Gough, R. Vafabakhsh, and R. Golestanian, Self-motile colloidal particles: from directed propulsion to random walk, Physical Review Letters99(2007)

work page 2007
[40]

T. H. N. Minh, B. Rotenberg, and S. Marbach, Ionic fluctuations in finite volumes: fractional noise and hype- runiformity, Faraday discussions246, 225 (2023)

work page 2023
[41]

D´ emery and D

V. D´ emery and D. S. Dean, The conductivity of strong electrolytes from stochastic density functional theory, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experi- ment2016, 023106 (2016)

work page 2016
[42]

Jardat, V

M. Jardat, V. Dahirel, and P. Illien, Diffusion of a tracer in a dense mixture of soft particles connected to different thermostats, Physical Review E106, 064608 (2022)

work page 2022
[43]

Mahdisoltani and R

S. Mahdisoltani and R. Golestanian, Transient fluctuation-induced forces in driven electrolytes af- ter an electric field quench, New Journal of Physics23, 073034 (2021)

work page 2021
[44]

Bernard, M

O. Bernard, M. Jardat, B. Rotenberg, and P. Illien, On analytical theories for conductivity and self-diffusion in concentrated electrolytes, The Journal of Chemical Physics159(2023)

work page 2023
[45]

Illien, The dean–kawasaki equation and stochastic den- sity functional theory, Reports on Progress in Physics88, 086601 (2025)

P. Illien, The dean–kawasaki equation and stochastic den- sity functional theory, Reports on Progress in Physics88, 086601 (2025)

work page 2025
[46]

Kuroda and K

Y. Kuroda and K. Miyazaki, Microscopic theory for hy- peruniformity in two-dimensional chiral active fluid, J. Stat. Mech.2023, 103203, 2305.06298 [cond-mat]

work page arXiv 2023
[47]

S. P. Das and A. Yoshimori, Coarse-grained forms for equations describing the microscopic motion of particles in a fluid, Physical Review E88, 043008

work page
[48]

M. A. Dur´ an-Olivencia, P. Yatsyshin, B. D. Goddard, and S. Kalliadasis, General framework for fluctuating dy- namic density functional theory, New Journal of Physics 19, 123022, publisher: IOP Publishing

work page
[49]

S. K. Yadav and S. P. Das, Hydrodynamic equations for active matter: Consequences of galilean transformations, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan91, 084601, pub- lisher: The Physical Society of Japan

work page
[50]

Kubo, Generalized cumulant expansion method, Jour- nal of the Physical Society of Japan17, 1100

R. Kubo, Generalized cumulant expansion method, Jour- nal of the Physical Society of Japan17, 1100

work page
[51]

Metzler and M

R. Metzler and M. Weiss, Discriminating stochastic pro- cesses for the assessment of materials properties by diffusion measurements, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (2025)

work page 2025
[52]

Ahmadi, M

A. Ahmadi, M. C. Marchetti, and T. B. Liverpool, Hy- drodynamics of isotropic and liquid crystalline active polymer solutions, Physical Review E74, 061913

work page
[53]

M. C. Marchetti, J.-F. Joanny, S. Ramaswamy, T. B. Liverpool, J. Prost, M. Rao, and R. A. Simha, Hydrody- namics of soft active matter, Reviews of modern physics 85, 1143 (2013)

work page 2013
[54]

Burekovi´ c, F

S. Burekovi´ c, F. D. Luca, M. E. Cates, and C. Nardini, Active cahn–hilliard theory for non-equilibrium phase separation: quantitative macroscopic predictions and a microscopic derivation, 2601.16539 [cond-mat]

work page arXiv
[55]

Spera, C

G. Spera, C. Duclut, M. Durand, and J. Tailleur, Ne- matic torques in scalar active matter: When fluctuations favor polar order and persistence, Physical Review Let- ters132, 078301

work page
[56]

Hansen and I

J.-P. Hansen and I. R. McDonald,Theory of simple liq- uids: with applications to soft matter(Academic press, 2013)

work page 2013
[57]

E. H. Hauge, Exact and chapman-enskog solutions of the boltzmann equation for the lorentz model, The Physics of fluids13, 1201 (1970)

work page 1970
[58]

Plesner, H

A. Plesner, H. H. B. Sørensen, and S. Hauberg, Accurate computation of the logarithm of modified bessel functions on gpus, inProceedings of the 38th ACM International Conference on Supercomputing, ICS ’24 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2024) pp. 213–224

work page 2024
[59]

Levitz, L

P. Levitz, L. Michot, N. Malikova, M. Scheel, and T. Weitkamp, Probing particle dynamics in a fully opaque porous network using x-ray differential dynamic radiography (XDDR), Soft Matter21, 3067

work page
[60]

M. Li, Y. Li, H. P. Zhang, and Y. Zhao, Detecting ac- tive l´ evy particles using differential dynamic microscopy, 2511.00775 [cond-mat]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[61]

Cerdin, S

T. Cerdin, S. Marbach, and C. Douarche, Number fluc- tuations distinguish different self-propelling dynamics, arxiv:.... (2026)

work page 2026
[62]

M. R. Bailey, A. R. Sprenger, F. Grillo, H. L¨ owen, and L. Isa, Fitting an active brownian particle’s mean- squared displacement with improved parameter estima- tion, Physical Review E106, L052602 (2022)

work page 2022
[63]

Br¨ oker, M

S. Br¨ oker, M. t. Vrugt, J. Jeggle, J. Stenhammar, and R. Wittkowski, Pair-distribution function of active brow- nian spheres in three spatial dimensions: simulation re- sults and analytical representation, Soft Matter20, 224

work page
[64]

Zhang, A

H.-P. Zhang, A. Be’er, E.-L. Florin, and H. L. Swinney, Collective motion and density fluctuations in bacterial colonies, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sci- ences107, 13626 (2010)

work page 2010
[65]

Peruani, J

F. Peruani, J. Starruß, V. Jakovljevic, L. Søgaard- Andersen, A. Deutsch, and M. B¨ ar, Collective motion and nonequilibrium cluster formation in colonies of glid- ing bacteria, Physical review letters108, 098102 (2012)

work page 2012
[66]

Z. Liu, W. Zeng, X. Ma, and X. Cheng, Density fluctua- tions and energy spectra of 3d bacterial suspensions, Soft Matter17, 10806 (2021)

work page 2021
[67]

Fily and M

Y. Fily and M. C. Marchetti, Athermal phase separation of self-propelled particles with no alignment, Physical re- view letters108, 235702 (2012)

work page 2012
[68]

S. Dey, D. Das, and R. Rajesh, Spatial structures and giant number fluctuations in models of active matter, Physical review letters108, 238001 (2012)

work page 2012
[69]

Alarc´ on, C

F. Alarc´ on, C. Valeriani, and I. Pagonabarraga, Mor- phology of clusters of attractive dry and wet self- propelled spherical particle suspensions, Soft matter13, 814 (2017)

work page 2017
[70]

Chat´ e, F

H. Chat´ e, F. Ginelli, G. Gr´ egoire, and F. Raynaud, Col- lective motion of self-propelled particles interacting with- out cohesion, Physical Review E77, 046113 (2008)

work page 2008
[71]

Chepizhko, D

O. Chepizhko, D. Saintillan, and F. Peruani, Revisiting the emergence of order in active matter, Soft Matter17, 3113 (2021)

work page 2021
[72]

Fadda, D

F. Fadda, D. A. Matoz-Fernandez, R. van Roij, and S. Jabbari-Farouji, The interplay between chemo- 20 phoretic interactions and crowding in active colloids, Soft Matter19, 2297 (2023)

work page 2023
[73]

Narayan, S

V. Narayan, S. Ramaswamy, and N. Menon, Long-lived giant number fluctuations in a swarming granular ne- matic, Science317, 105 (2007)

work page 2007
[74]

Toner, Y

J. Toner, Y. Tu, and S. Ramaswamy, Hydrodynamics and phases of flocks, Annals of Physics318, 170 (2005)

work page 2005
[75]

R. M. Navarro and S. M. Fielding, Clustering and phase behaviour of attractive active particles with hydrody- namics, Soft Matter11, 7525 (2015)

work page 2015
[76]

Carter and R

A. Carter and R. Fish, adamrob- carter/scattering functions: v0.1.2 (2025)

work page 2025
[77]

Marbach, A

S. Marbach, A. Carter, and B. Sprinkle, Counto- scope/countoscope prx: v1.0.1 (2025)

work page 2025