pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.03010 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-03 · 🌌 astro-ph.SR · astro-ph.GA

Recognition: 1 theorem link

· Lean Theorem

Evidence of Enhanced Ionization in Protostellar Envelopes

Kamber R. Schwarz , S. Maret , M. R. A. Wells , C. Gieser , A. Belloche , P. Andre , C. Codella
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 18:11 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.GA
keywords protostellar envelopesionization ratesClass 0 protostarsH13CO+C18Ochemical evolutionstar formation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Protostellar envelopes show ionization rates up to thousands of times higher than the diffuse interstellar medium.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reports measurements of ionization rates in the dense envelopes around three Class 0 protostars using millimeter observations of H13CO+ and C18O. The derived rates fall between 10^{-16} and 10^{-13} per second, well above the 6 times 10^{-17} value typical of the diffuse interstellar medium. These elevated rates imply that ionization-driven chemical reactions operate more efficiently during the first 100,000 years of star formation while the envelope is still present. The result matters because the chemical inventory established at this stage is later inherited by the protoplanetary disk and eventually by forming planets.

Core claim

Using NOEMA and IRAM 30 m observations of H13CO+ and C18O toward NGC 1333 IRAS 4A, L1448-C, and L1157, the authors calculate ionization rates zeta in the range 1e-16 to 1e-13 s^{-1}. These values are several orders of magnitude above the canonical interstellar-medium rate of 6e-17 s^{-1}, supporting the conclusion that ionization-driven chemistry proceeds more rapidly at the earliest stages of protostellar evolution, less than 10^5 years old.

What carries the argument

Conversion of observed H13CO+ and C18O line intensities into ionization rates through chemical-network modeling and excitation calculations.

If this is right

  • Ionization-driven chemistry is more efficient during the embedded Class 0 phase than after the envelope disperses.
  • The chemical composition delivered to protoplanetary disks is already shaped by these high ionization conditions.
  • Standard models of early star formation must incorporate ionization rates at least 10 to 1000 times higher than the diffuse-medium value.
  • Chemical processing relevant to planet formation begins well before the envelope clears.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Local ionization sources such as enhanced cosmic rays or X-rays from the central protostar may dominate over the standard interstellar flux.
  • Mapping ionization across individual envelopes at higher angular resolution could reveal spatial gradients tied to accretion or outflow activity.
  • Repeating the same analysis on more evolved Class I sources would test whether ionization rates decline as the envelope mass decreases.

Load-bearing premise

The chemical networks and excitation models that convert the observed H13CO+ and C18O intensities into ionization rates are accurate and complete for these dense envelopes.

What would settle it

An independent measurement, such as direct cosmic-ray flux or an alternative ionization tracer, that yields rates closer to 6e-17 s^{-1} in the same envelope regions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.03010 by A. Belloche, C. Codella, C. Gieser, Kamber R. Schwarz, M. R. A. Wells, P. Andre, S. Maret.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Combined NOEMA+IRAM 30m observations of H13CO+ 1-0 (background), and C18O 2-1 (contours, convolved to the resolution of the H13CO+) envelope emission toward three protostars: NGC 1333-IRAS4A (left), L1157 (center), and L1448-C (right). Contours start at 3σ and have 6σ spacing for IRAS4A and 3σ spacing for the other sources. The grey dashed lines are perpendicular to the small scale outflows. The grey ellip… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: H 13CO+ 1-0 (blue) and C18O 2-1 (black, con￾volved to the spatial resolution of H13CO+) spectra toward L1157. The spectra in each panel are offset by half θmaj for the H13CO+ observations. ack et al. 1992; R. Visser et al. 2011; K. Furuya & Y. Aikawa 2018). Setting the formation and destruction rates for HCO+ equal gives N(HCO+) N(CO) = n(H+ 3 )kH + 3 n(e)βHCO+ . (1) Similarly setting the formation and des… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: H 13CO+ 1-0 (blue) and C18O 2-1 (black, con￾volved to the spatial resolution of H13CO+) spectra toward L1448-C. The spectra in each panel are offset by half θmaj for the H13CO+ observations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Maps of the derived column densities for CO (top) and HCO+ (bottom) based on our observations of C18O and H 13CO+ respectively. Contours indicate the isotopologue emission from 3 to 21 times the RMS in 5 equally spaced steps [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Cosmic ray ionization rate derived from the abundance ratio of HCO+ and CO assuming an electron abundance equal to the HCO+ abundance (P. Caselli et al. 2002). The ionization rate is calculated only in regions where both tracers are detected at > 3σ. Contours indicate the C18O 2-1 emission, from 3 to 21 times the RMS in 5 equally spaced steps. The C18O for IRAS4A is shown after correcting for absorption. I… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Ionization is a major driver of both physical and chemical evolution in protostellar systems. Recent observations reveal substantial chemical processing in protoplanetary disks by the time the surrounding envelope has cleared. Thus, physical conditions during the preceeding phase, when an infalling envelope of material is still present, are crucial for determining the extent of chemical processing at early stages. We used observations of H13CO+ and C18O from the Northern Extended Millimeter Array (NOEMA) and IRAM 30m telescope to constrain the ionization rate in the envelopes of three Class 0 protostars: NGC-1333 IRAS4A, L1448-C, and L1157. We find ionization rates in the range zeta = 1e-16 - 1e-13 s$^{-1}$ , several orders of magnitude above the ionization rate of zeta = 6e-17 s$^{-1}$ in the diffuse interstellar medium. This supports the idea that ionization driven chemistry is more efficient at earlier stages (< 1e5 years) of protostellar evolution.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents NOEMA and IRAM 30m observations of H13CO+ and C18O toward three Class 0 protostars (NGC 1333 IRAS4A, L1448-C, L1157). From these data the authors derive envelope ionization rates in the range zeta = 1e-16 to 1e-13 s^{-1}, several orders of magnitude above the canonical diffuse-ISM value of 6e-17 s^{-1}, and conclude that ionization-driven chemistry is therefore more efficient at early (<10^5 yr) protostellar stages.

Significance. If the derived rates are robust, the result would indicate that protostellar envelopes experience substantially higher ionization than the diffuse ISM, with direct consequences for the chemical networks that set the initial molecular inventory of protoplanetary disks. The work supplies an observational anchor for models of early-stage ionization that is currently missing from the literature.

major comments (2)
  1. [Modeling / Results] The central claim rests on the conversion of observed H13CO+ and C18O intensities into an ionization rate via a chemical network plus excitation model. No section or equation is supplied that lists the adopted reaction network, rate coefficients, or the functional dependence of zeta on the observed line ratios; without this information the elevation relative to the ISM value cannot be evaluated for model dependence.
  2. [Results] The abstract and results state a range zeta = 1e-16–1e-13 s^{-1} but provide neither the formal uncertainties on each source nor the sensitivity of the derived zeta to the assumed density and temperature structure. Because the chemical solution is known to be degenerate with n(H2) and T, the reported elevation could be partly an artifact of those assumptions.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract cites the ISM reference value as 6e-17 s^{-1} without a reference; please add the appropriate citation.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions should explicitly state the beam size, velocity resolution, and rms noise levels for the NOEMA and 30 m data.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major point below and will revise the paper to improve transparency and robustness of the modeling.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Modeling / Results] The central claim rests on the conversion of observed H13CO+ and C18O intensities into an ionization rate via a chemical network plus excitation model. No section or equation is supplied that lists the adopted reaction network, rate coefficients, or the functional dependence of zeta on the observed line ratios; without this information the elevation relative to the ISM value cannot be evaluated for model dependence.

    Authors: We agree that the reaction network details were not presented with sufficient explicitness. The model is based on the UMIST2012 gas-phase network with key HCO+ formation/destruction reactions as referenced in Section 3, and zeta is obtained from the steady-state abundance ratio under the adopted excitation conditions. In the revised manuscript we will add a new subsection (3.3) that tabulates the relevant reactions and rate coefficients, together with the explicit functional dependence of zeta on the observed line ratio, enabling readers to assess model dependence directly. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] The abstract and results state a range zeta = 1e-16–1e-13 s^{-1} but provide neither the formal uncertainties on each source nor the sensitivity of the derived zeta to the assumed density and temperature structure. Because the chemical solution is known to be degenerate with n(H2) and T, the reported elevation could be partly an artifact of those assumptions.

    Authors: We acknowledge that formal uncertainties and explicit sensitivity tests to n(H2) and T were omitted. The quoted range reflects the spread across the three sources using our fiducial envelope models. The revised manuscript will report per-source zeta values with uncertainties propagated from line intensities and model parameters, and will include a sensitivity analysis (new figure and text) demonstrating that the elevation above 6e-17 s^{-1} remains robust across the plausible range of envelope densities and temperatures. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: observational inference via standard chemical modeling

full rationale

The paper reports ionization rates derived from NOEMA and IRAM 30m observations of H13CO+ and C18O line intensities in three Class 0 envelopes. The derivation applies a chemical network plus excitation model to convert observed intensities into zeta values; this is forward modeling to infer a parameter from data, not a self-definitional loop or a fitted input renamed as prediction. No equations in the abstract or context reduce the reported zeta range (1e-16 to 1e-13 s^{-1}) to quantities defined by the fit itself. No self-citation load-bearing steps, uniqueness theorems, or ansatz smuggling are present. The result is presented as an empirical measurement relative to the ISM benchmark, with the central claim remaining independent of its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central result rests on a fitted ionization rate derived from molecular abundances and on the domain assumption that H13CO+ abundance is controlled primarily by cosmic-ray ionization in these envelopes.

free parameters (1)
  • ionization rate zeta = 1e-16 - 1e-13 s^{-1}
    The reported range 1e-16 to 1e-13 s^{-1} is obtained by fitting or matching observed line intensities to chemical models.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption H13CO+ and C18O abundances are set primarily by the cosmic-ray ionization rate via a standard astrochemistry network
    Invoked to convert observed intensities into zeta; validity for dense protostellar gas is not examined in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5518 in / 1376 out tokens · 75108 ms · 2026-05-13T18:11:40.142642+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 83 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    , keywords =

    Adams, F. C., Lada, C. J., & Shu, F. H. 1987, ApJ, 312, 788, doi: 10.1086/164924

    work page doi:10.1086/164924 1987

  2. [2]

    1999, A&A, 351, 233

    Aikawa, Y., & Herbst, E. 1999, A&A, 351, 233

    work page 1999

  3. [3]

    2021, ApJS, 257, 13, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac143c

    Aikawa, Y., Cataldi, G., Yamato, Y., et al. 2021, ApJS, 257, 13, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac143c

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac143c 2021

  4. [4]

    2016, A&A, 591, A3, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527831

    Anderl, S., Maret, S., Cabrit, S., et al. 2016, A&A, 591, A3, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527831

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527831 2016

  5. [5]

    E., Blake, G

    Anderson, D. E., Blake, G. A., Bergin, E. A., et al. 2019, ApJ, 881, 127, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2cb5 Andr´ e, P. 1995, Ap&SS, 224, 29, doi: 10.1007/BF00667817

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab2cb5 2019

  6. [6]

    From Pre-Stellar Cores to Protostars: The Initial Conditions of Star Formation

    Andre, P., Ward-Thompson, D., & Barsony, M. 2000, in Protostars and Planets IV, ed. V. Mannings, A. P. Boss, & S. S. Russell, 59, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9903284

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/9903284 2000

  7. [7]

    P., van der Marel, N., et al

    Ansdell, M., Williams, J. P., van der Marel, N., et al. 2016, ApJ, 828, 46, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/828/1/46

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/828/1/46 2016

  8. [8]

    A., Carpenter, J

    Barenfeld, S. A., Carpenter, J. M., Sargent, A. I., Isella, A., & Ricci, L. 2017, ApJ, 851, 85, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa989d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa989d 2017

  9. [9]

    J., & Garrod, R

    Barger, C. J., & Garrod, R. T. 2020, ApJ, 888, 38, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5b0d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab5b0d 2020

  10. [10]

    2006, A&A, 453, 145, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20054770

    Belloche, A., Hennebelle, P., & Andr´ e, P. 2006, A&A, 453, 145, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20054770

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20054770 2006

  11. [11]

    J., Maret, S., et al

    Belloche, A., Maury, A. J., Maret, S., et al. 2020, A&A, 635, A198, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201937352

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201937352 2020

  12. [12]

    2021, A&A, 645, A91, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039609

    Benedettini, M., Viti, S., Codella, C., et al. 2021, A&A, 645, A91, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039609

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039609 2021

  13. [13]

    A., & Langer, W

    Bergin, E. A., & Langer, W. D. 1997, ApJ, 486, 316, doi: 10.1086/304510

    work page doi:10.1086/304510 1997

  14. [14]

    S., & Ilee, J

    Booth, A. S., & Ilee, J. D. 2020, MNRAS, 493, L108, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slaa014

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slaa014 2020

  15. [15]

    D., Walsh, C., & van Dishoeck, E

    Bosman, A. D., Walsh, C., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2018, A&A, 618, A182, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833497

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833497 2018

  16. [16]

    2021, A&A, 653, A117, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141157

    Bouvier, M., L´ opez-Sepulcre, A., Ceccarelli, C., et al. 2021, A&A, 653, A117, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141157

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141157 2021

  17. [17]

    D., & Eisner, J

    Boyden, R. D., & Eisner, J. A. 2024, ApJ, 967, 103, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad3cd5

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad3cd5 2024

  18. [18]

    2023, A&A, 674, A27, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243813

    Cabedo, V., Maury, A., Girart, J. M., et al. 2023, A&A, 669, A90, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243813

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243813 2023

  19. [19]

    , keywords =

    Caselli, P., Walmsley, C. M., Terzieva, R., & Herbst, E. 1998, ApJ, 499, 234, doi: 10.1086/305624

    work page doi:10.1086/305624 1998

  20. [20]

    M., Zucconi, A., et al

    Caselli, P., Walmsley, C. M., Zucconi, A., et al. 2002, ApJ, 565, 344, doi: 10.1086/324302

    work page doi:10.1086/324302 2002

  21. [21]

    2014, ApJL, 790, L1, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/790/1/L1

    Ceccarelli, C., Dominik, C., L´ opez-Sepulcre, A., et al. 2014, ApJL, 790, L1, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/790/1/L1

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/790/1/l1 2014

  22. [22]

    I., Adams, F

    Cleeves, L. I., Adams, F. C., & Bergin, E. A. 2013, ApJ, 772, 5, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/772/1/5

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/772/1/5 2013

  23. [23]

    Ilsedore and Bergin, Edwin A

    Cleeves, L. I., Bergin, E. A., Qi, C., Adams, F. C., & ¨Oberg, K. I. 2015, ApJ, 799, 204, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/799/2/204

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/799/2/204 2015

  24. [24]

    2013, ApJ, 776, 52, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/776/1/52 Di Francesco, J., Myers, P

    Codella, C., Viti, S., Ceccarelli, C., et al. 2013, ApJ, 776, 52, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/776/1/52 Di Francesco, J., Myers, P. C., Wilner, D. J., Ohashi, N., &

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/776/1/52 2013

  25. [25]

    doi:10.1086/323854 , eprint =

    Mardones, D. 2001, ApJ, 562, 770, doi: 10.1086/323854

    work page doi:10.1086/323854 2001

  26. [26]

    A., Hogerheijde, M., et al

    Du, F., Bergin, E. A., Hogerheijde, M., et al. 2017, ApJ, 842, 98, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa70ee

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa70ee 2017

  27. [27]

    A., Bally, J

    Eisner, J. A., Bally, J. M., Ginsburg, A., & Sheehan, P. D. 2016, ApJ, 826, 16, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/826/1/16

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/826/1/16 2016

  28. [28]

    Eistrup, C., Walsh, C., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2016, A&A, 595, A83, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628509

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201628509 2016

  29. [29]

    2024, Nature Astronomy, 8, 587, doi: 10.1038/s41550-024-02207-w

    Facchini, S., Testi, L., Humphreys, E., et al. 2024, Nature Astronomy, 8, 587, doi: 10.1038/s41550-024-02207-w

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-024-02207-w 2024

  30. [30]

    2017, A&A, 608, A82, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201630177 10Schwarz et al

    Favre, C., L´ opez-Sepulcre, A., Ceccarelli, C., et al. 2017, A&A, 608, A82, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201630177 10Schwarz et al

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201630177 2017

  31. [31]

    W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J

    Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. 2013, PASP, 125, 306, doi: 10.1086/670067

    work page doi:10.1086/670067 2013

  32. [32]

    I., & Kimura, S

    Fujii, Y. I., & Kimura, S. S. 2022, ApJL, 937, L37, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac86c2

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac86c2 2022

  33. [33]

    J., Ali, B., et al

    Furlan, E., Fischer, W. J., Ali, B., et al. 2016, ApJS, 224, 5, doi: 10.3847/0067-0049/224/1/5

    work page doi:10.3847/0067-0049/224/1/5 2016

  34. [34]

    2018, ApJ, 857, 105, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aab768

    Furuya, K., & Aikawa, Y. 2018, ApJ, 857, 105, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aab768

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aab768 2018

  35. [35]

    Gaches, B. A. L., & Offner, S. S. R. 2018, ApJ, 861, 87, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aac94d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aac94d 2018

  36. [36]

    J., Belloche, A., et al

    Gaudel, M., Maury, A. J., Belloche, A., et al. 2020, A&A, 637, A92, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936364

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936364 2020

  37. [37]

    M., et al

    Gieser, C., Caselli, P., Segura-Cox, D. M., et al. 2025, A&A, 701, A165, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202555688

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555688 2025

  38. [38]

    F., & Langer, W

    Goldsmith, P. F., & Langer, W. D. 1999, ApJ, 517, 209, doi: 10.1086/307195 G¨ udel, M., & Naz´ e, Y. 2009, A&A Rv, 17, 309, doi: 10.1007/s00159-009-0022-4

    work page doi:10.1086/307195 1999

  39. [39]

    V., Ramos, A., et al

    Harsono, D., Persson, M. V., Ramos, A., et al. 2020, A&A, 636, A26, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935994

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935994 2020

  40. [40]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science and Engineering, 9, 90, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 Jørgensen, J. K., Sch¨ oier, F. L., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2004, A&A, 416, 603, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20034440

    work page doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.55 2007

  41. [41]

    2016, A&A, 588, A108, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526791

    Kama, M., Bruderer, S., Carney, M., et al. 2016, A&A, 588, A108, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526791

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526791 2016

  42. [42]

    J., Kristensen, L

    Karska, A., Kaufman, M. J., Kristensen, L. E., et al. 2018, ApJS, 235, 30, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aaaec5

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aaaec5 2018

  43. [43]

    Boogert, A. C. A., & Caux, E. 2017, A&A, 603, A88, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201630160

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201630160 2017

  44. [44]

    E., van Dishoeck, E

    Kristensen, L. E., van Dishoeck, E. F., Bergin, E. A., et al. 2012, A&A, 542, A8, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118146

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201118146 2012

  45. [45]

    2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Lesur, G., Flock, M., Ercolano, B., et al. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka, Y. Aikawa, T. Muto, K. Tomida, & M. Tamura, 465, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2203.09821

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.09821 2023

  46. [46]

    E., Cleeves, L

    Long, D. E., Cleeves, L. I., Adams, F. C., et al. 2024, ApJ, 972, 88, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5c67

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad5c67 2024

  47. [47]

    J., Pascucci, I., et al

    Long, F., Herczeg, G. J., Pascucci, I., et al. 2017, ApJ, 844, 99, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa78fc

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa78fc 2017

  48. [48]

    G., Padovani, M., & Gaches, B

    Luo, G., Bisbas, T. G., Padovani, M., & Gaches, B. A. L. 2024, A&A, 690, A293, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450285

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450285 2024

  49. [49]

    J., et al

    Maret, S., Belloche, A., Maury, A. J., et al. 2014, A&A, 563, L1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201323028

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201323028 2014

  50. [50]

    arXiv , author =:2001.06355 , journal =

    Maret, S., Maury, A. J., Belloche, A., et al. 2020, A&A, 635, A15, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936798

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936798 2020

  51. [51]

    J., Andr´ e, P., Testi, L., et al

    Maury, A. J., Andr´ e, P., Testi, L., et al. 2019, A&A, 621, A76, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833537

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833537 2019

  52. [52]

    C., et al

    Nakasone, H., Notsu, S., Yoshida, T. C., et al. 2026, ApJ, 998, 53, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae2c82

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae2c82 2026

  53. [53]

    F., Walsh, C., Bosman, A

    Notsu, S., van Dishoeck, E. F., Walsh, C., Bosman, A. D., & Nomura, H. 2021, A&A, 650, A180, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202140667

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140667 2021

  54. [54]

    2019, ApJ, 875, 96, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab0ae9

    Notsu, S., Akiyama, E., Booth, A., et al. 2019, ApJ, 875, 96, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab0ae9

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab0ae9 2019

  55. [55]

    V., Silsbee, K., et al

    Obolentseva, M., Ivlev, A. V., Silsbee, K., et al. 2024, ApJ, 973, 142, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad71ce

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad71ce 2024

  56. [56]

    2016, A&A, 590, A8, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628221

    Padovani, M., Marcowith, A., Hennebelle, P., & Ferri` ere, K. 2016, A&A, 590, A8, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628221

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201628221 2016

  57. [57]

    N., Deng, D., et al

    Pascucci, I., Skinner, B. N., Deng, D., et al. 2023, ApJ, 953, 183, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ace4bf

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ace4bf 2023

  58. [58]

    E., Sipil¨ a, O., Segura-Cox, D

    Pineda, J. E., Sipil¨ a, O., Segura-Cox, D. M., et al. 2024, A&A, 686, A162, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347997

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347997 2024

  59. [59]

    2014, A&A, 565, A64, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322928

    Bachiller, R. 2014, A&A, 565, A64, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322928

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322928 2014

  60. [60]

    2015, A&A, 579, A82, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201525885

    Dutrey, A. 2015, A&A, 579, A82, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201525885

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525885 2015

  61. [61]

    2024, A&A, 685, A67, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346413

    Redaelli, E., Bovino, S., Lupi, A., et al. 2024, A&A, 685, A67, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346413

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346413 2024

  62. [62]

    2025, A&A, 702, A210, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202453198

    Redaelli, E., Bovino, S., Sabatini, G., et al. 2025, A&A, 702, A210, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202453198

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202453198 2025

  63. [63]

    D., & Charnley, S

    Rodgers, S. D., & Charnley, S. B. 2003, ApJ, 585, 355, doi: 10.1086/345497

    work page doi:10.1086/345497 2003

  64. [64]

    A., Gonz´ alez-Ruilova, C., Cieza, L

    Ruiz-Rodriguez, D. A., Gonz´ alez-Ruilova, C., Cieza, L. A., et al. 2025, ApJ, 989, 2, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/add2ec

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/add2ec 2025

  65. [65]

    2023, ApJL, 947, L18, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acc940

    Sabatini, G., Bovino, S., & Redaelli, E. 2023, ApJL, 947, L18, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acc940

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acc940 2023

  66. [66]

    2020, A&A, 644, A34, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039010

    Sabatini, G., Bovino, S., Giannetti, A., et al. 2020, A&A, 644, A34, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039010

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039010 2020

  67. [67]

    2019, A&A, 623, L3, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834551

    Sanna, A., Moscadelli, L., Goddi, C., et al. 2019, A&A, 623, L3, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834551

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834551 2019

  68. [68]

    2015, A&A, 584, A126, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526323

    Santangelo, G., Codella, C., Cabrit, S., et al. 2015, A&A, 584, A126, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526323

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526323 2015

  69. [69]

    R., Bergin, E

    Schwarz, K. R., Bergin, E. A., Cleeves, L. I., et al. 2016, ApJ, 823, 91, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/823/2/91

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/823/2/91 2016

  70. [70]

    R., Bergin, E

    Schwarz, K. R., Bergin, E. A., Cleeves, L. I., et al. 2018, ApJ, 856, 85, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaae08

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaae08 2018

  71. [71]

    A., Cleeves, L

    Seifert, R. A., Cleeves, L. I., Adams, F. C., & Li, Z.-Y. 2021, ApJ, 912, 136, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abf09a

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abf09a 2021

  72. [72]

    P., et al

    Trapman, L., Zhang, K., Rosotti, G. P., et al. 2025, ApJ, 989, 5, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adcd6e Ionization in Protostellar Envelopes11

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adcd6e 2025

  73. [73]

    2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Tsukamoto, Y., Maury, A., Commercon, B., et al. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka, Y. Aikawa, T. Muto, K. Tomida, & M. Tamura, 317, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2209.13765

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2209.13765 2023

  74. [74]

    J., Karska, A., et al

    Tychoniec, L., Tobin, J. J., Karska, A., et al. 2018, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 238, 19, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aaceae van der Tak, F. F. S., Black, J. H., Sch¨ oier, F. L., Jansen, D. J., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2007, A&A, 468, 627, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20066820 van der Walt, S., Colbert, S. C., & Varoquaux, G. 2011, Computing in Scien...

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aaceae 2018

  75. [75]

    Dishoeck, E. F. 2018, A&A, 615, A83, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201732313 van’t Hoff, M. L. R., Leemker, M., Tobin, J. J., et al. 2022, ApJ, 932, 6, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac63b4

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201732313 2018

  76. [76]

    D., & van Dishoeck, E

    Visser, R., Doty, S. D., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2011, A&A, 534, A132, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117249

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117249 2011

  77. [77]

    E., Bruderer, S., et al

    Visser, R., Kristensen, L. E., Bruderer, S., et al. 2012, A&A, 537, A55, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117109

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117109 2012

  78. [78]

    2024, , 689, A63, 10.1051/0004-6361/202450606

    Wakelam, V., Gratier, P., Loison, J. C., et al. 2024, A&A, 689, A63, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450606

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450606 2024

  79. [79]

    Webber, W. R. 1998, ApJ, 506, 329, doi: 10.1086/306222

    work page doi:10.1086/306222 1998

  80. [80]

    Wilson, T. L. 1999, Reports on Progress in Physics, 62, 143, doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/62/2/002

    work page doi:10.1088/0034-4885/62/2/002 1999

Showing first 80 references.