arxiv: 2604.03090 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-03 · ⚛️ nucl-th · nucl-ex

Recognition: no theorem link

The form factor expansion in the precision β decay era

Leendert Hayen

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 19:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-th nucl-ex

keywords beta decayform factor expansionrecoil correctionsnuclear structureStandard Model testsab initio theoryradiative corrections

0 comments

The pith

Recoil-order approximations in traditional β decay form factor expansions introduce unnoticed uncertainties now limiting precision Standard Model tests.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how common recoil-order approximations in the form factor expansion for nuclear β decay have their origins in older formalisms and often go unnoticed. After recent improvements in nucleon-level radiative corrections, nuclear structure effects have become the dominant uncertainty in several scenarios. It reviews what has been resolved and identifies remaining open questions. A sympathetic reader cares because these approximations affect the accuracy of extracting fundamental parameters and searching for new physics in precision β decay experiments. Progress in ab initio nuclear theory is presented as a path to move beyond the limitations without adding new uncontrolled errors.

Core claim

The paper claims that traditional form factor expansions for β decay matrix elements rely on recoil-order approximations whose effects are frequently overlooked, that some of these issues have been addressed in recent work, and that several open questions remain regarding their impact. It argues that ab initio nuclear theory now provides the means to compute the necessary corrections more rigorously for precision tests of the Standard Model.

What carries the argument

The traditional form factor expansion of nuclear weak currents in β decay, with its recoil-order truncation terms that approximate the momentum dependence.

If this is right

Nuclear structure uncertainties can be reduced below current levels in superallowed Fermi transitions and neutron decay.
Precision extraction of the CKM matrix element Vud becomes limited by theory only after these approximations are removed.
Open questions in the formalism point to specific transitions where recoil effects must be treated exactly.
Ab initio methods must be extended to include full recoil kinematics for allowed and forbidden decays.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

This review suggests that similar unnoticed approximations may exist in related weak processes such as muon capture.
Connecting the resolved issues to modern effective field theory could yield parameter-free predictions for a wider range of nuclei.
Future experiments measuring higher-order correlations could directly test the size of the neglected recoil terms.

Load-bearing premise

Progress in ab initio nuclear theory can overcome the limitations from recoil-order approximations without introducing new uncontrolled uncertainties.

What would settle it

A full ab initio calculation for a specific allowed β decay transition that yields a measurable difference in a correlation coefficient or ft value compared to the traditional recoil-approximated result.

read the original abstract

Precision tests of the Standard Model using $\beta$ decay have always relied on a careful choice of transition to minimize residual nuclear structure uncertainties. Following breakthroughs in nucleon-level radiative corrections in the last decade, however, corrections due to nuclear structure are once more a limiting factor in several scenarios. Progress in ab initio nuclear theory provides a path forward, but common recoil-order approximations in traditional formalisms often go unnoticed. Here, we critically examine their origin and address recently resolved and identify open questions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Hayen flags unnoticed recoil-order approximations in beta decay form factors as a lingering issue now that radiative corrections are tighter, but the paper stays diagnostic without new numbers or derivations.

read the letter

The core point is that traditional form factor expansions for beta decay still lean on recoil-order approximations that rarely get called out, and with nucleon-level radiative corrections now much cleaner, these nuclear pieces are limiting precision tests of the Standard Model again. Hayen walks through where those approximations originate and notes which ones recent work has cleaned up versus which ones remain open.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript critically examines unnoticed recoil-order approximations in traditional form factor expansions for precision β-decay analyses. It argues that advances in nucleon-level radiative corrections have made nuclear structure effects the new limiting factor, positions ab initio nuclear theory as a viable path forward, and identifies recently resolved issues along with open questions in the field.

Significance. If the approximations introduce uncontrolled uncertainties at the level relevant for current and near-future precision measurements, the review could usefully redirect attention toward more systematic treatments of recoil effects, thereby supporting tighter Standard Model tests via β decay. The explicit flagging of resolved versus open questions provides a concrete agenda for the community.

major comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that recoil-order approximations 'often go unnoticed' and limit precision is asserted qualitatively, yet no explicit derivations, numerical error estimates, or concrete examples of their impact on extracted observables (e.g., ft values or correlation coefficients) are supplied; without such quantification the urgency of the re-examination remains difficult to assess.

minor comments (1)

The introduction would benefit from one or two explicit citations to the specific traditional formalisms (e.g., the standard impulse-approximation expansions) whose recoil-order terms are under discussion.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript and for highlighting the need for greater quantification in the abstract. We address the comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that recoil-order approximations 'often go unnoticed' and limit precision is asserted qualitatively, yet no explicit derivations, numerical error estimates, or concrete examples of their impact on extracted observables (e.g., ft values or correlation coefficients) are supplied; without such quantification the urgency of the re-examination remains difficult to assess.

Authors: We agree that the abstract would benefit from a concrete illustration to better convey the urgency. The body of the manuscript already contains the detailed derivations and discussions of recoil-order effects, including their origins in traditional expansions and implications for precision observables. In the revised version we will augment the abstract with a brief, specific example (e.g., the size of the neglected recoil correction to the ft value in a representative superallowed transition at the level relevant for current tests of CKM unitarity). This addition will be kept concise while directing readers to the quantitative analysis in the main text. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The manuscript is a critical review paper that examines the origin of recoil-order approximations in traditional form-factor expansions for precision β-decay and flags resolved/open questions. It references external progress in nucleon-level radiative corrections and ab initio nuclear theory as a path forward, without presenting any new derivation, fitted parameters, or quantitative predictions whose validity reduces to self-citation chains or inputs by construction. No equations, ansätze, or uniqueness theorems are invoked that loop back to the paper's own fitted values or prior self-citations in a load-bearing way. The central content is identification of unnoticed approximations and open issues, which is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central discussion rests on standard assumptions of nuclear effective field theory and form factor expansions from prior literature; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Form factor expansions in beta decay can be organized by recoil order with standard nuclear matrix elements.
Invoked when discussing traditional formalisms and their approximations.
domain assumption Ab initio nuclear theory calculations provide sufficiently accurate wave functions for reducing structure uncertainties.
Stated as providing a path forward without further justification in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5363 in / 1133 out tokens · 27762 ms · 2026-05-13T19:07:12.149848+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

107 extracted references · 107 canonical work pages

[1]

Theory of Angular Correlation of Nuclear Radiations

Biedenharn LC, Rose ME. Theory of Angular Correlation of Nuclear Radiations. Reviews of Modern Physics 25 (1953) 729–

work page 1953
[2]

doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.25.729

work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.25.729
[3]

Nuclear Matrix Elements in Beta Decay

Rose ME, Osborn RK. Nuclear Matrix Elements in Beta Decay. Physical Review 93 (1954) 1326

work page 1954
[4]

The universal Fermi interaction and the conserved vector current in beta decay

Wu CS. The universal Fermi interaction and the conserved vector current in beta decay. Reviews of Modern Physics 36 (1964) 618–

work page 1964
[5]

doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.36.618

work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.36.618
[6]

Muon capture in certain light nuclei

Fujii A, Primakoff H. Muon capture in certain light nuclei. Il Nuovo Cimento 12 (1959) 327–355. doi:10.1007/BF02745906

work page doi:10.1007/bf02745906 1959
[8]

First-Forbidden Transitions in Parity-Nonconserving Beta Decay

Morita M, Morita RS. First-Forbidden Transitions in Parity-Nonconserving Beta Decay. Physical Review 109 (1958) 2048–

work page 1958
[9]

doi:10.1103/PhysRev.109.2048

work page doi:10.1103/physrev.109.2048 2048
[10]

Theory of Beta Decay

Morita M. Theory of Beta Decay. Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement 26 (1963) 1–63. doi:10.1143/PTPS.26.1

work page doi:10.1143/ptps.26.1 1963
[11]

Nuclear β -decay

Stech B, Sch¨ ulke L. Nuclear β -decay. i. Zeitschrift f ¨ur Physik 179 (1964) 314–330. doi:10.1007/BF01381649

work page doi:10.1007/bf01381649 1964
[12]

Nuclear β -decay

Sch¨ ulke L. Nuclear β -decay. ii. Zeitschrift f¨ur Physik 179 (1964) 331–342. doi:10.1007/ BF01381650

work page 1964
[13]

First-Forbidden Beta Decay

Weidenm¨ uller HA. First-Forbidden Beta Decay. Reviews of Modern Physics 33 (1961) 574

work page 1961
[14]

Application of the Goldberger-Treiman Relation to the Beta Decay of Complex Nuclei

Kim CW, Primakoff H. Application of the Goldberger-Treiman Relation to the Beta Decay of Complex Nuclei. Physical Review 139 (1965) B1447

work page 1965
[15]

Theory of Muon Capture with Initial and Final Nuclei Treated as ”Elementary” Particles

Kim CW, Primakoff H. Theory of Muon Capture with Initial and Final Nuclei Treated as ”Elementary” Particles. Physical Review 140 (1965) B566–B575. doi:10.1103/ PhysRev.140.B566. Frontiers 7 Hayen Form factors in precision β decay

work page 1965
[16]

Comparison of Impulse-Approximation and Elementary- Particle Treatments in Nuclear Beta Decay

Armstrong L, Kim CW. Comparison of Impulse-Approximation and Elementary- Particle Treatments in Nuclear Beta Decay. Physical Review C 6 (1972) 1924–1934. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.6.1924

work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.6.1924 1972
[17]

Nuclear beta decay

Behrens H, B¨ uhring W. Nuclear beta decay. Nuclear Physics A 162 (1971) 111–144. doi: 10.1016/0375-9474(71)90489-1

work page doi:10.1016/0375-9474(71)90489-1 1971
[18]

The Theory of Beta Radioactivity (Oxford University Press) (1966)

Konopinski EJ. The Theory of Beta Radioactivity (Oxford University Press) (1966)

work page 1966
[19]

Recoil effects in allowed beta decay: the elementary particle approach

Holstein B. Recoil effects in allowed beta decay: the elementary particle approach. Reviews of Modern Physics 46 (1974) 789

work page 1974
[20]

Electron radial wave functions and nuclear beta-decay (Clarendon Press, Oxford) (1982)

Behrens H, B¨ uhring W. Electron radial wave functions and nuclear beta-decay (Clarendon Press, Oxford) (1982)

work page 1982
[21]

Weak nucleon currents in beta decay and muon capture

Morita M. Weak nucleon currents in beta decay and muon capture. Hyperﬁne Interactions 21 (1985) 143–158. doi:10. 1007/BF02061982

work page 1985
[22]

Tests of the standard electroweak model in nuclear beta decay

Severijns N, Beck M, Naviliat-Cuncic O. Tests of the standard electroweak model in nuclear beta decay. Reviews of Modern Physics 78 (2006) 991–1040. doi:10.1103/ RevModPhys.78.991

work page 2006
[23]

Beta decay beyond the standard model

Herczeg P . Beta decay beyond the standard model. Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 46 (2001) 413–457. doi:10.1016/ S0146-6410(01)00149-1

work page 2001
[24]

Low energy probes of physics beyond the standard model

Cirigliano V , Ramsey-Musolf MJ. Low energy probes of physics beyond the standard model. Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 71 (2013) 2–20. doi:10. 1016/j.ppnp.2013.03.002

work page 2013
[25]

Symmetry Tests in Nuclear Beta Decay

Severijns N, Naviliat-Cuncic O. Symmetry Tests in Nuclear Beta Decay. Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 61 (2011) 23–46. doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-102010-130410

work page doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-102010-130410 2011
[26]

Effects of Three-Nucleon Forces and Two-Body Currents on Gamow-Teller Strengths

Ekstr¨ om A, Jansen GR, Wendt KA, Hagen G, Papenbrock T, Bacca S, et al. Effects of Three-Nucleon Forces and Two-Body Currents on Gamow-Teller Strengths. Physical Review Letters 113 (2014) 262504. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.262504

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.262504 2014
[27]

The role of ab initio beta-decay calculations in light nuclei for probes of physics beyond the standard model (2026)

Sargsyan GH, King GB, Glick-Magid A, Seng CY . The role of ab initio beta-decay calculations in light nuclei for probes of physics beyond the standard model (2026)

work page 2026
[28]

Discrepancy between experimental and theoretical β - decay rates resolved from ﬁrst principles

Gysbers P , Hagen G, Holt JD, Jansen GR, Morris TD, Navr´ atil P , et al. Discrepancy between experimental and theoretical β - decay rates resolved from ﬁrst principles. Nature Physics 15 (2019) 428–431. doi:10. 1038/s41567-019-0450-7

work page 2019
[29]

O 16 electroweak response functions from ﬁrst principles

Acharya B, Sobczyk JE, Bacca S, Hagen G, Jiang W. O 16 electroweak response functions from ﬁrst principles. Physical Review Letters 134 (2025) 202501. doi:10. 1103/PhysRevLett.134.202501

work page 2025
[31]

High- Precision Nuclear Forces From Chiral EFT: State-of-the-Art, Challenges, and Outlook

Epelbaum E, Krebs H, Reinert P . High- Precision Nuclear Forces From Chiral EFT: State-of-the-Art, Challenges, and Outlook. Frontiers in Physics 8 (2020) 1–30. doi:10. 3389/fphy.2020.00098

work page arXiv 2020
[32]

Weak interaction symmetries with atom traps

Behr Ja, Gorelov a, Melconian D, Trinczek M, Alford WP , Ashery D, et al. Weak interaction symmetries with atom traps. European Physical Journal A 25 (2005) 685–

work page 2005
[33]

doi:10.1140/epjad/i2005-06-097-9

work page doi:10.1140/epjad/i2005-06-097-9
[34]

Standard model tests with trapped radioactive atoms

Behr JA, Gwinner G. Standard model tests with trapped radioactive atoms. Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics 36 (2009) 033101. doi:10.1088/0954-3899/36/ 3/033101

work page doi:10.1088/0954-3899/36/ 2009
[35]

Cyclotron radiation emission spectroscopy

Oblath NS, V anDevender BA. Cyclotron radiation emission spectroscopy. Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 74 (2024) 447–472. doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-120523-021323

work page doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-120523-021323 2024
[36]

First Observation of Cyclotron Radiation from Frontiers 8 Hayen Form factors in precision β decay MeV -Scale e± following Nuclear β Decay

Byron W, Harrington H, Taylor RJ, Degraw W, Buzinsky N, Dodson B, et al. First Observation of Cyclotron Radiation from Frontiers 8 Hayen Form factors in precision β decay MeV -Scale e± following Nuclear β Decay. Physical Review Letters 131 (2023). doi:10. 1103/PhysRevLett.131.082502

work page 2023
[37]

Searches for massive neutrinos with mechanical quantum sensors

Carney D, Leach KG, Moore DC. Searches for massive neutrinos with mechanical quantum sensors. PRX Quantum 4 (2023) 010315. doi:10.1103/PRXQuantum. 4.010315

work page doi:10.1103/prxquantum 2023
[38]

Direct experimental constraints on the spatial extent of a neutrino wavepacket

Smolsky J, Leach KG, Abells R, Amaro P , Andoche A, Borbridge K, et al. Direct experimental constraints on the spatial extent of a neutrino wavepacket. Nature 638 (2025) 640–644. doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08479-6

work page doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08479-6 2025
[40]

High precision analytical description of the allowed beta spectrum shape

Hayen L, Severijns N, Bodek K, Rozpedzik D, Mougeot X. High precision analytical description of the allowed beta spectrum shape. Reviews of Modern Physics 90 (2018) 015008. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys. 90.015008

work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys 2018
[41]

Beta Spectrum Generator: High precision allowed β spectrum shapes

Hayen L, Severijns N. Beta Spectrum Generator: High precision allowed β spectrum shapes. Computer Physics Communications 240 (2019) 152–164. doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2019.02.012

work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2019.02.012 2019
[42]

Opportunities and open questions in modern beta decay

Hayen L. Opportunities and open questions in modern beta decay. Annual Reviews of Nuclear and Particle Science 09 (2024) 497–

work page 2024
[43]

doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-121423

work page doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-121423
[45]

First-forbidden transitions in the reactor anomaly

Hayen L, Kostensalo J, Severijns N, Suhonen J. First-forbidden transitions in the reactor anomaly. Physical Review C 100 (2019) 054323. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.100. 054323

work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.100 2019
[46]

Conﬂux: A standardized framework to calculate reactor antineutrino ﬂux

Zhang X, Irani A, Mendenhall MP , Rybicki N, Hayen L, Bowden N, et al. Conﬂux: A standardized framework to calculate reactor antineutrino ﬂux. Computer Physics Communications 317 (2025) 109831. doi:10. 1016/j.cpc.2025.109831

work page arXiv 2025
[47]

Impact of reactor neutrino uncertainties on coherent scattering’s discovery potential

Hayen L. Impact of reactor neutrino uncertainties on coherent scattering’s discovery potential. Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics 52 (2025) 055103. doi:10.1088/1361-6471/ad8ee2

work page doi:10.1088/1361-6471/ad8ee2 2025
[48]

On the Fermi Theory of β -Radioactivity

Konopinski EJ, Uhlenbeck GE. On the Fermi Theory of β -Radioactivity. Physical Review 48 (1935) 7

work page 1935
[49]

On the Fermi Theory of β -Radioactivity

Konopinski EJ, Uhlenbeck GE. On the Fermi Theory of β -Radioactivity. II. The ”Forbidden” Spectra. Physical Review 60 (1941) 308

work page 1941
[50]

Beta- Decay

Konopinski EJ. Beta- Decay. Reviews of Modern Physics 15 (1943) 209

work page 1943
[51]

Electromagnetic corrections to allowed nuclear beta decay

Holstein BR. Electromagnetic corrections to allowed nuclear beta decay. Physical Review C 9 (1974) 1742. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.9. 1742

work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.9 1974
[53]

Weak magnetism and the beta spectra of 12b and 12n

Calaprice FP , Holstein BR. Weak magnetism and the beta spectra of 12b and 12n. Nuclear Physics A 273 (1976) 301–325

work page 1976
[54]

Analysis of the recoil ion spectra for the β - decays of 6He, 19Ne and 35Ar

Kleppinger W, Calaprice F, Holstein BR. Analysis of the recoil ion spectra for the β - decays of 6He, 19Ne and 35Ar. Nuclear Physics A 293 (1977) 46–60. doi:10.1016/ 0375-9474(77)90475-4

work page 1977
[55]

Scalar interaction limits from the β -ν correlation of trapped radioactive atoms

Gorelov a, Melconian D, Alford WP , Ashery D, Ball G, Behr Ja, et al. Scalar interaction limits from the β -ν correlation of trapped radioactive atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005) 3–6. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.142501

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.94.142501 2005
[56]

Frontiers 9 Hayen Form factors in precision β decay Precision measurements of the 60co β - asymmetry parameter in search for tensor currents in weak interactions

Wauters F, Kraev I, Z´ akouck´ y D, Beck M, Breitenfeldt M, De Leebeeck V , et al. Frontiers 9 Hayen Form factors in precision β decay Precision measurements of the 60co β - asymmetry parameter in search for tensor currents in weak interactions. Physical Review C 82 (2010) 055502. doi:10.1103/ PhysRevC.82.055502

work page 2010
[57]

Measurement of the β -asymmetry parameter of 67cu in search for tensor-type currents in the weak interaction

Soti G, Wauters F, Breitenfeldt M, Finlay P , Herzog P , Knecht A, et al. Measurement of the β -asymmetry parameter of 67cu in search for tensor-type currents in the weak interaction. Physical Review C - Nuclear Physics 90 (2014) 035502. doi:10.1103/ PhysRevC.90.035502

work page 2014
[58]

New result for the neutron β -asymmetry parameter A0 from UCNA

Brown MA, Dees EB, Adamek E, Allgeier B, Blatnik M, Bowles TJ, et al. New result for the neutron β -asymmetry parameter A0 from UCNA. Physical Review C 97 (2018) 35505. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.97.035505

work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.97.035505 2018
[59]

Improved limit on tensor currents in the weak interaction from li 8 β decay

Burkey MT, Savard G, Gallant A T, Scielzo ND, Clark JA, Hirsh TY , et al. Improved limit on tensor currents in the weak interaction from li 8 β decay. Physical Review Letters 128 (2022) 202502. doi:10. 1103/PhysRevLett.128.202502

work page 2022
[61]

Impact of Clustering on the Li 8 β Decay and Recoil Form Factors

Sargsyan GH, Launey KD, Burkey MT, Gallant A T, Scielzo ND, Savard G, et al. Impact of Clustering on the Li 8 β Decay and Recoil Form Factors. Physical Review Letters 128 (2022) 202503. doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.128.202503

work page 2022
[62]

Lorentz Invariance and the Kinematic Structure of V ertex Functions

Durand L, DeCelles PC, Marr RB. Lorentz Invariance and the Kinematic Structure of V ertex Functions. Physical Review 126 (1962) 1882–1898. doi:10.1103/PhysRev. 126.1882

work page doi:10.1103/physrev 1962
[63]

On the elementary particle approach to muon capture

Galindo A, Pascual P . On the elementary particle approach to muon capture. Nuclear Physics, Section B 14 (1969) 37–51. doi:10. 1016/0550-3213(69)90342-3

work page 1969
[64]

Microscopic analysis of the elementary particle description of nuclear currents (North Holland Publ

Delorme J. Microscopic analysis of the elementary particle description of nuclear currents (North Holland Publ. Co. Amsterdam) (1979)

work page 1979
[65]

On the general theory of collisions for particles with spin

Jacob M, Wick G. On the general theory of collisions for particles with spin. Annals of Physics 7 (1959) 404–428. doi:10.1016/ 0003-4916(59)90051-X

work page 1959
[66]

Electron scattering and nuclear structure

de Forest T, Walecka JD. Electron scattering and nuclear structure. Advances in Physics 15 (1966) 1–109. doi:10.1080/ 00018736600101254

work page 1966
[67]

Electron Scattering and Nuclear Structure

Donnelly TW, Walecka JD. Electron Scattering and Nuclear Structure. Annual Review of Nuclear Science 25 (1975) 329–

work page 1975
[68]

doi:10.1146/annurev.ns.25.120175. 001553

work page doi:10.1146/annurev.ns.25.120175
[69]

Theoretical Nuclear and Subnuclear Physics (World Scientiﬁc), 2nd editio edn

Walecka JD. Theoretical Nuclear and Subnuclear Physics (World Scientiﬁc), 2nd editio edn. (2004)

work page 2004
[70]

Ab initio calculation of the β -decay spectrum of he6

King GB, Baroni A, Cirigliano V , Gandolﬁ S, Hayen L, Mereghetti E, et al. Ab initio calculation of the β -decay spectrum of he6. Physical Review C 107 (2023) 015503. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.107.015503

work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.107.015503 2023
[71]

Lorentz covariance of the 4d nonlinear higher-spin equations via BRST

Glick-Magid A, Forss´ en C, Gazda D, Gazit D, Gysbers P , Navr´ atil P . Nuclear ab initio calculations of 6He β -decay for beyond the Standard Model studies. Physics Letters B 832 (2022) 137259. doi:10.1016/j.physletb. 2022.137259

work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb 2022
[72]

Superallowed 0+ → 0+ nuclear β decays: 2020 critical survey, with implications for vud and ckm unitarity

Hardy JC, Towner IS. Superallowed 0+ → 0+ nuclear β decays: 2020 critical survey, with implications for vud and ckm unitarity. Physical Review C 102 (2020) 045501. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.102.045501

work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.102.045501 2020
[73]

Angular Momentum in Quantum Mechanics (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University) (1957)

Edmonds AR, Mendlowitz H. Angular Momentum in Quantum Mechanics (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University) (1957)

work page 1957
[74]

Consistent description of angular correlations in β decay for Beyond Standard Model physics searches (2020)

Hayen L, Y oung AR. Consistent description of angular correlations in β decay for Beyond Standard Model physics searches (2020). Frontiers 10 Hayen Form factors in precision β decay

work page 2020
[75]

Allowed β - transitions, weak magnetism and nuclear structure in light nuclei

Behrens H, Genz H, Conze M, Feldmeier H, Stock W, Richter A. Allowed β - transitions, weak magnetism and nuclear structure in light nuclei. Annals of Physics 115 (1978) 276–324. doi:10.1016/ 0003-4916(78)90158-6

work page 1978
[76]

The Pseudoscalar Interaction and the Beta Spectrum of RaE

Rose ME, Osborn RK. The Pseudoscalar Interaction and the Beta Spectrum of RaE. Phys. Rev. 93 (1954) 1315–1325

work page 1954
[77]

On the Dirac Theory of Spin 1/2 Particles and Its Non- Relativistic Limit

Foldy LL, Wouthuysen SA. On the Dirac Theory of Spin 1/2 Particles and Its Non- Relativistic Limit. Physical Review 78 (1950) 29–36. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.78.29

work page doi:10.1103/physrev.78.29 1950
[78]

Analysis of neutron β -decay

Wilkinson D. Analysis of neutron β -decay. Nuclear Physics A 377 (1982) 474–504. doi: 10.1016/0375-9474(82)90051-3

work page doi:10.1016/0375-9474(82)90051-3 1982
[79]

Hyperon Beta Decay

Shekhter VM. Hyperon Beta Decay. Soviet Physics JETP 35 (1959) 316

work page 1959
[80]

Nicolás, The bar derived category of a curved dg algebra, Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra 212 (2008) 2633–2659

Glick-Magid A, Mishnayot Y , Mukul I, Hass M, Ron G, V aintraub S, et al. Beta spectrum of unique ﬁrst-forbidden decays as a novel test for fundamental symmetries. Physics Letters B 767 (2016) 285. doi:10.1016/j. physletb.2017.02.023

work page doi:10.1016/j 2016
[81]

Multipole decomposition of tensor interactions of fermionic probes with composite particles and BSM signatures in nuclear reactions

Glick-Magid A, Gazit D. Multipole decomposition of tensor interactions of fermionic probes with composite particles and BSM signatures in nuclear reactions. Physical Review D 107 (2023) 075031. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.075031

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.075031 2023
[82]

Unique forbidden beta decays at zero momentum transfer

Seng CY , Glick-Magid A, Cirigliano V . Unique forbidden beta decays at zero momentum transfer. Physical Review Letters 134 (2025) 081805. doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.134.081805

work page 2025
[83]

F t values of the t = 1 / 2 mirror β transitions

Severijns N, Tandecki M, Phalet T, Towner IS. F t values of the t = 1 / 2 mirror β transitions. Physical Review C 78 (2008) 055501. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.78.055501

work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.78.055501 2008
[84]

Test of the Conserved V ector Current Hypothesis in T = 1 / 2 Mirror Transitions and New Determination of |V {ud}|

Naviliat-Cuncic O, Severijns N. Test of the Conserved V ector Current Hypothesis in T = 1 / 2 Mirror Transitions and New Determination of |V {ud}|. Physical Review Letters 102 (2009) 142302. doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.102.142302

work page 2009
[85]

Precision measurement of the β asymmetry in spin- polarized 37k decay

Fenker B, Gorelov A, Melconian D, Behr JA, Anholm M, Ashery D, et al. Precision measurement of the β asymmetry in spin- polarized 37k decay. Physical Review Letters 120 (2018) 062502. doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.120.062502

work page 2018
[86]

Limit on tensor currents from 8li β decay

Sternberg MGG, Segel R, Scielzo NDD, Savard G, Clark JAA, Bertone PFF, et al. Limit on tensor currents from 8li β decay. Physical Review Letters 115 (2015) 182501. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.182501

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.182501 2015

Showing first 80 references.