arxiv: 2604.03314 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-01 · 💻 cs.CV · cs.CL

Recognition: no theorem link

CoLA: Cross-Modal Low-rank Adaptation for Multimodal Downstream Tasks

Wish Suharitdamrong , Tony Alex , Muhammad Awais , Sara Ahmed

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 22:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV cs.CL

keywords cross-modal adaptationparameter-efficient fine-tuninglow-rank adaptationmultimodal tasksvisual groundingLoRAvision-languageaudio-visual

0 comments

The pith

CoLA introduces a dual-path low-rank adaptation that lets unimodal models handle multimodal tasks without interference.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Foundation models are strong at single-modality tasks but adapting them to combined vision-language or audio-visual jobs is inefficient. Standard LoRA methods adapt each modality in isolation and therefore miss important cross-modal interactions. CoLA extends this by adding a dedicated inter-modal adaptation pathway that runs alongside the intra-modal one. The dual design keeps modality-specific learning separate from cross-modal learning so neither interferes with the other. On standard benchmarks it delivers consistent gains of around three percent for vision-language tasks and two percent for audio-visual tasks while using very few extra parameters.

Core claim

CoLA extends LoRA by introducing a dedicated inter-modal adaptation pathway alongside the standard intra-modal one. This dual-path design enables CoLA to adapt unimodal foundation models to multimodal tasks effectively, without interference between modality-specific and cross-modal learning.

What carries the argument

The dual-path low-rank adaptation consisting of parallel intra-modal and inter-modal adaptation modules.

If this is right

Outperforms standard LoRA by around 3% relative gain on vision-language benchmarks including RefCOCO, RefCOCO+, and RefCOCOg.
Achieves around 2% relative gain on audio-visual benchmarks such as AVE and AVS.
Enables the first multi-task parameter-efficient fine-tuning framework for visual grounding.
Maintains the parameter efficiency of LoRA while adding cross-modal capability.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

This dual-path idea could apply to other modality combinations such as text and video without requiring new foundation models.
It suggests that reusing strong unimodal encoders with targeted cross-modal adapters may be more efficient than training fully multimodal models from scratch.
Future tests could check whether the inter-modal path remains beneficial when scaling to larger models or more complex tasks.
The approach opens a route for efficient multi-task learning across different multimodal datasets.

Load-bearing premise

The inter-modal pathway adds useful cross-modal information without causing interference or overfitting to the specific vision-language and audio-visual benchmarks used.

What would settle it

Running CoLA on a new multimodal task outside vision-language and audio-visual domains and finding no improvement or a drop compared to standard LoRA would falsify the benefit of the added pathway.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.03314 by Muhammad Awais, Sara Ahmed, Tony Alex, Wish Suharitdamrong.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Comparison of LoRA and CoLA in dual-encoder architectures for multimodal tasks. (a) LoRA applies independent low-rank adaptation within each modality without cross-modal interaction. (b) CoLA enables cross-modal interaction through inter-modal fusion pathways, allowing information exchange between Modality 1 and Modality 2 during the low-rank adaptation process. Modality 1 and Modality 2 can be vision, l… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: (Left) The overall architecture of CoLA applied to pre-trained linear components W0 in transformer blocks with the intra-modal pathway ∆WL and inter-modal fusion pathway ∆WC in Equation 4, which integrates dynamic weights from cross-modal features via a hypernetwork. (Right) Illustration of the progressive cross-modal propagation between dual encoders, transferring cross-modal features to linear component … view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Visualization of learned scaling factors λ across transformer layers for different components (Wq, Wk, Wv, Wo, Wup, Wdown) in dual-encoder architectures. The plots show how crossmodal interaction strength varies by layer depth and component type for vision-language and audio-visual tasks, with higher λ values indicating stronger cross-modal influence. ways and progressive propagation are crucial for opti… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Illustration of different sharing strategies for CoLA low-rank matrices between pathways: (a) Fully shared, (b) Partially shared A, (c) Partially shared B, (d) Fully non-shared. C.2. Cross-modal Feature Propagation Strategy a) Uniform b) Module-wise c) Progressive Modality 1 features Modality 2 features Modality 1 features Modality 2 features Modality 1 features Modality 2 features MHSA Module FFN Module U… view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Comparison of cross-modal propagation strategies: (a) uniform, (b) module-wise, and (c) progressive designs The uniform and module-wise propagation strategies are defined as illustrated in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Visualization of computational and memory trade-offs experiment between LoRA and CoLA on the AVE task. While CoLA achieves comparable computational efficiency (GFLOPs), the inter-modal pathway’s inability to merge into pre-trained weights introduces modest runtime overhead at inference. CoLA results in increases in GPU memory (MB), training time (samples/s), and inference latency (samples/s) compared to Lo… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Foundation models have revolutionized AI, but adapting them efficiently for multimodal tasks, particularly in dual-stream architectures composed of unimodal encoders, such as DINO and BERT, remains a significant challenge. Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) methods like Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) enable lightweight adaptation, yet they operate in isolation within each modality, limiting their ability in capturing cross-modal interactions. In this paper, we take a step in bridging this gap with Cross-Modal Low-Rank Adaptation (CoLA), a novel PEFT framework that extends LoRA by introducing a dedicated inter-modal adaptation pathway alongside the standard intra-modal one. This dual-path design enables CoLA to adapt unimodal foundation models to multimodal tasks effectively, without interference between modality-specific and cross-modal learning. We evaluate CoLA across a range of vision-language (RefCOCO, RefCOCO+, RefCOCOg) and audio-visual (AVE, AVS) benchmarks, where it consistently outperforms LORA, achieving a relative gain of around 3\% and 2\%, respectively, while maintaining parameter efficiency. Notably, CoLA enables the first multi-task PEFT framework for visual grounding, bridging a key gap in efficient multimodal adaptation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper proposes CoLA, a Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) extension of LoRA that adds a dedicated inter-modal low-rank adaptation pathway alongside the standard intra-modal pathways. This dual-path architecture is intended to adapt unimodal encoders (e.g., DINO and BERT) to multimodal tasks such as visual grounding (RefCOCO, RefCOCO+, RefCOCOg) and audio-visual segmentation (AVE, AVS) without interference between modality-specific and cross-modal learning. The manuscript reports consistent outperformance over LoRA with relative gains of approximately 3% on vision-language benchmarks and 2% on audio-visual benchmarks while preserving parameter efficiency, and claims to enable the first multi-task PEFT framework for visual grounding.

Significance. If the reported gains can be shown to arise specifically from the inter-modal pathway rather than added capacity, CoLA would provide a lightweight, modular way to bridge unimodal foundation models to multimodal downstream tasks. This addresses a practical gap in PEFT literature for dual-stream architectures and could support more efficient multi-task adaptation in vision-language and audio-visual settings.

major comments (2)

[Experiments] Experiments section: the reported relative gains (~3% vision-language, ~2% audio-visual) over LoRA are presented without ablations that control for parameter count. No comparison is shown to an intra-modal-only baseline with equivalent added parameters (e.g., higher-rank LoRA within each modality) or to random inter-modal matrices. This control is required to substantiate the central claim that the dedicated inter-modal pathway captures useful cross-modal interactions rather than simply increasing capacity.
[Method] Method section: the dual-path design is asserted to operate 'without interference between modality-specific and cross-modal learning,' yet no quantitative analysis (e.g., gradient norms, representation similarity, or ablation on pathway interaction) is provided to support this. The claim is load-bearing for the novelty of the architecture.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract: the phrase 'around 3% and 2%' should reference the specific metrics (e.g., mIoU, accuracy) and point to the corresponding result tables for precision.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the referee's report. We value the constructive criticism provided, which helps improve the clarity and rigor of our work on CoLA. Below, we address each major comment in detail.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Experiments] Experiments section: the reported relative gains (~3% vision-language, ~2% audio-visual) over LoRA are presented without ablations that control for parameter count. No comparison is shown to an intra-modal-only baseline with equivalent added parameters (e.g., higher-rank LoRA within each modality) or to random inter-modal matrices. This control is required to substantiate the central claim that the dedicated inter-modal pathway captures useful cross-modal interactions rather than simply increasing capacity.

Authors: We acknowledge that the current experiments do not include explicit controls for parameter count, which is a valid concern for validating the contribution of the inter-modal pathway. To address this, we will revise the Experiments section to include two additional baselines: (i) an intra-modal LoRA with increased rank to match CoLA's parameter budget, and (ii) CoLA with randomly initialized (frozen) inter-modal matrices. Preliminary results indicate that these controls yield lower performance than full CoLA, supporting our claims. These ablations will be added in the revised manuscript. revision: yes
Referee: [Method] Method section: the dual-path design is asserted to operate 'without interference between modality-specific and cross-modal learning,' yet no quantitative analysis (e.g., gradient norms, representation similarity, or ablation on pathway interaction) is provided to support this. The claim is load-bearing for the novelty of the architecture.

Authors: The assertion of no interference stems from the architectural separation of the adaptation pathways, where intra-modal and inter-modal low-rank matrices are distinct and applied to different input streams. While this design intuitively prevents direct interference, we agree that empirical validation is necessary. In the revised version, we will include quantitative analyses such as comparisons of gradient norms across pathways during training and cosine similarity of representations before and after adaptation to demonstrate minimal interference. This will strengthen the methodological contribution. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: architectural definition, not derived prediction

full rationale

The paper introduces CoLA as a new PEFT architecture that adds an explicit inter-modal low-rank pathway to standard intra-modal LoRA. This is a design choice defined directly in the method section rather than a quantity derived from equations or fitted parameters that are then relabeled as predictions. No self-citation chain, uniqueness theorem, or ansatz is invoked to force the result; the dual-path structure is presented as an extension whose value is evaluated empirically on downstream benchmarks. The central claim therefore remains independent of its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so no concrete free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be extracted. The method description implies new low-rank matrices for the cross-modal path, but their exact form and initialization are unspecified.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5521 in / 1108 out tokens · 41387 ms · 2026-05-13T22:20:25.634594+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

9 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

[1]

Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for lan- guage understanding

Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., and Toutanova, K. Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for lan- guage understanding. InProceedings of the 2019 confer- ence of the North American chapter of the association for computational linguistics: human language technologies, volume 1 (long and short papers), pp. 4171–4186,

work page 2019
[2]

An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale

Dosovitskiy, A., Beyer, L., Kolesnikov, A., Weissenborn, D., Zhai, X., Unterthiner, T., Dehghani, M., Minderer, M., Heigold, G., Gelly, S., et al. An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale.arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.11929,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[3]

Clap learning audio concepts from natural language su- pervision

Elizalde, B., Deshmukh, S., Al Ismail, M., and Wang, H. Clap learning audio concepts from natural language su- pervision. InICASSP 2023-2023 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp. 1–5. IEEE,

work page 2023
[4]

Densely connected parameter-efficient tun- ing for referring image segmentation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.08580,

Huang, J., Xu, Z., Liu, T., Liu, Y ., Han, H., Yuan, K., and Li, X. Densely connected parameter-efficient tun- ing for referring image segmentation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.08580,

work page arXiv
[5]

The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuning

Lester, B., Al-Rfou, R., and Constant, N. The power of scale for parameter-efficient prompt tuning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.08691,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[6]

Li, X. L. and Liang, P. Prefix-tuning: Optimizing continuous prompts for generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.00190,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[7]

Mapper: Multimodal prior-guided parameter efficient tuning for referring expression comprehension.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.13609,

Liu, T., Xu, Z., Hu, Y ., Shi, L., Wang, Z., and Yin, Q. Mapper: Multimodal prior-guided parameter efficient tuning for referring expression comprehension.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.13609,

work page arXiv
[8]

DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervision

Oquab, M., Darcet, T., Moutakanni, T., V o, H., Szafraniec, M., Khalidov, V ., Fernandez, P., Haziza, D., Massa, F., El- Nouby, A., et al. Dinov2: Learning robust visual features without supervision.arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.07193,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[9]

Swimvg: Step-wise multimodal fusion and adaption for visual grounding.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.16786,

Shi, L., Liu, T., Hu, X., Hu, Y ., Yin, Q., and Hong, R. Swimvg: Step-wise multimodal fusion and adaption for visual grounding.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.16786,

work page arXiv