arxiv: 2604.03458 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-03 · 📡 eess.SY · cs.SY

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

A Wirtinger Power Flow Jacobian Singularity Condition for Voltage Stability in Converter-Rich Power Systems

Ahmed Mesfer Alkhudaydi , Bai Cui

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 18:41 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SY cs.SY

keywords voltage stabilitypower flow JacobianWirtinger derivativesconverter-rich systemsJacobian singularitystability indexdiagonal dominance

0 comments

The pith

A Wirtinger-derived index C_W greater than one at every bus certifies nonsingularity of the power flow Jacobian in converter-rich systems.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a Wirtinger derivative formulation for the power flow Jacobian that accounts for voltage- and current-limited converter behavior at all bus types. It derives an explicit sufficient condition for nonsingularity from diagonal dominance and proves that the alternative Jacobian shares singularity points with the conventional formulation. The resulting bus-wise index C_W yields a fast non-iterative stability margin that case studies on IEEE systems show is less conservative and more localized than the L-index, K_R index, or SCR index.

Core claim

The central claim is that the Wirtinger-based power flow Jacobian has the same singularity points as the conventional Jacobian, and that the condition min_i C_{W,i} > 1, where each C_{W,i} is obtained from diagonal dominance applied to the Wirtinger formulation, is sufficient to certify nonsingularity and thereby voltage stability when converters replace stiff voltage sources.

What carries the argument

Wirtinger derivative formulation of the power flow Jacobian whose singularity is certified by the minimum bus-wise diagonal dominance ratio C_W.

If this is right

The singularity condition extends explicitly to all bus types rather than only slack and PQ buses.
The min C_W > 1 test supplies a non-iterative voltage stability margin.
The index produces less conservative and more localized stability assessments than the L-index, K_R index, and SCR index on standard test systems.
Singularity of the Wirtinger Jacobian coincides exactly with singularity of the conventional Jacobian under the maintained power flow model structure.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The index could support real-time monitoring in large grids by avoiding iterative Jacobian factorization.
Placement of converters might be optimized to raise the global min C_W and thereby enlarge the certified stability region.
The same diagonal dominance approach may extend to other Jacobian-dependent analyses such as sensitivity calculations or small-signal stability.

Load-bearing premise

The Wirtinger Jacobian formulation and the diagonal dominance conditions remain valid once voltage- and current-limited converter behavior is incorporated at every bus type.

What would settle it

A power flow solution in which the Jacobian matrix is singular yet min_i C_{W,i} remains strictly greater than one, or the reverse, when converter limits are active.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.03458 by Ahmed Mesfer Alkhudaydi, Bai Cui.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: , Vi lies on the circle |Vi | = const, and the unitmodulus factor κi defines the tangent direction satisfying dI∗ i = κidIi , which preserves |Vi |. In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Tangent direction on the constant-|I| space. B. Generic Tangent Representation The voltage and current magnitude constraints admit a unified representation in the complex plane. For each bus i, admissible perturbations satisfy the tangent condition dI∗ i = ξi dIi , |ξi | = 1, i ∈ C, (9) where the tangent factor ξi is defined via ξi =    0, i ∈ U (unconstrained bus), κi , i ∈ CV (voltage-constrained … view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Example of a two bus system. represents the single independent state variable that governs small perturbations in that bus. Accordingly, the reduced Jacobian for the two-bus system collapses to a scalar element that relates incremental active power changes to phase angle variations as J (2-bus) red = α ∗ 2 + κ2α2, (17) where α2 is the self-sensitivity coefficient of the reduced network model defined in (13… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Evolution of the proposed Wirtinger Jacobian matrix across loading [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: The 9-bus system [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: The IEEE 39-bus system Table II compares the per-bus indices at the critical loading point P ∗ = 1.0. Bus 3 exhibits the lowest CW value of (0.4853), which indicates the weakest voltage stability margin. This is consistent with its position in the chain configuration, where cumulative impedance along the feeder reduces the effective Thevenin voltage support relative to buses closer to the slack. The high L… view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Comparison of the CW , KR [14], and SCR indices across all buses at the critical operating point for the 9-bus system show loading levels: (a) 10%, (b) 40%, (c) 70%, and (d) 100%. B. 9-Bus IBR-Rich Test System The proposed index is validated through power-flow simulations in MATPOWER [25] on a representative network of the Hami region in China [26], [27], which includes both chain and radial configuration… view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Comparative evolution of the unified index [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: (a) CW and (b) KR indices at all IBRs across loading sweep, with threshold crossings marked at CW = 1.0 and KR = 1.0 from voltage regulation to current-limited operation, wherein the current magnitude is held constant and its phase adjusts to maintain power balance. This transition is captured by the Wirtinger-based tangent factors discussed in Sec. III. IBR injections are varied via a scalar λ ∈ {0.2, 0.4… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

The progression of modern power systems towards converter-rich operations calls for new models and analytics in steady-state voltage stability assessment. The classic modeling assumption of the generators as stiff voltage sources no longer holds. Instead, the voltage- and current-limited behaviors of converters need to be considered. In this paper, we develop a Wirtinger derivative-based formulation for the power flow Jacobian and derive an explicit sufficient condition for its singularity. Compared to existing works, we extend the explicit sufficient singularity condition to incorporate all bus types instead of only slack and PQ types. We prove that the singularity of the alternative Jacobian coincides with that of the conventional one. A bus-wise voltage stability index, denoted $C_{\mathrm{W}}$, is derived from diagonal dominance conditions. The condition $\min_i C_{W,i}$ being greater than one certifies the nonsingularity of the Jacobian and provides a fast, non-iterative stability margin. Case studies in standard IEEE test systems show that the proposed index yields less conservative and more localized assessments than classical indices such as the L-index, the $K_{\mathrm{R}}$ index, and the SCR index.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The Wirtinger Jacobian extension and C_W index look promising on paper, but the IEEE test cases skip the converter limits the work claims to address.

read the letter

The main advance here is a Wirtinger derivative version of the power flow Jacobian that produces an explicit singularity condition covering all bus types instead of just slack and PQ. From the diagonal dominance properties they extract a simple per-bus index C_W, with the claim that min C_W,i > 1 certifies the Jacobian stays nonsingular and supplies a quick, non-iterative stability margin. They also show that this alternative Jacobian shares its singularity points with the conventional one. That coincidence result and the extension to every bus type are the genuinely new pieces relative to earlier explicit conditions. The index itself is easy to compute once the Jacobian is formed, and the IEEE case studies indicate it is less conservative and more localized than L-index, K_R, or SCR. Those are real practical upsides if the math holds. The soft spot is the gap between the stated motivation and the tests. The abstract stresses that converter voltage and current limits break the stiff-voltage-source assumption and must be incorporated, yet the numerical work uses only standard IEEE systems where generators remain fixed-voltage sources with no active limits. When limits engage, the Jacobian entries jump discontinuously, so the diagonal-dominance argument may not continue to certify nonsingularity even if min C_W stays above one. Without results on a system that actually exercises those mode switches, the central claim for converter-rich grids rests on untested ground. The derivation appears to assume the standard power-flow structure throughout, which is fine for the conventional cases shown but leaves the extension unverified. This is the sort of paper voltage-stability researchers should see. The core ideas are clear, the index is lightweight, and the coincidence proof is worth checking even if the examples need more work on limited converter models. It deserves a serious referee.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper develops a Wirtinger derivative-based formulation for the power flow Jacobian in converter-rich systems, derives an explicit sufficient singularity condition applicable to all bus types (extending prior work limited to slack/PQ), proves that this alternative Jacobian shares singularity points with the conventional Jacobian, introduces a bus-wise index C_W obtained from diagonal dominance such that min_i C_{W,i} > 1 certifies nonsingularity and supplies a fast non-iterative margin, and reports case-study comparisons on IEEE test systems showing less conservative and more localized results than the L-index, K_R index, and SCR index.

Significance. If the derivation and coincidence proof hold under the stated assumptions, the work supplies a computationally lightweight voltage-stability margin that directly incorporates converter behaviors and avoids iterative eigenvalue or continuation methods, which would be useful for real-time assessment in grids with high converter penetration.

major comments (3)

[Case Studies] Case Studies section: the numerical validation uses only standard IEEE test systems in which generators remain stiff voltage sources without voltage or current limits. This leaves untested the central extension to converter-limited operation, where mode switches produce discontinuous Jacobian entries that can invalidate the diagonal-dominance argument even when min C_W,i > 1.
[Proof of singularity coincidence] Proof that alternative and conventional Jacobians share singularity points (likely §3–4): the argument relies on the power-flow equations retaining their standard structure; once converter limits are active the Jacobian changes discontinuously, so the claimed coincidence and the sufficiency of the C_W > 1 condition require explicit verification or counter-example analysis under saturation.
[Derivation of C_W] Derivation of C_W (from diagonal dominance applied to the Wirtinger Jacobian): the index is obtained by applying dominance conditions to the derived Jacobian, but the manuscript does not demonstrate that the resulting C_W remains a valid nonsingularity certificate once limit-induced mode switches alter the Jacobian entries.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract states that the index 'yields less conservative' assessments, but the case-study tables do not report quantitative margins or error bars that would allow direct comparison of conservatism.
[Notation] Notation: the Wirtinger Jacobian blocks and the precise definition of the diagonal-dominance ratio used for C_W should be restated explicitly in the main text rather than left to supplementary material.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments. We address each major point below, clarifying the scope of the current derivation and indicating the revisions that will be made to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Case Studies] Case Studies section: the numerical validation uses only standard IEEE test systems in which generators remain stiff voltage sources without voltage or current limits. This leaves untested the central extension to converter-limited operation, where mode switches produce discontinuous Jacobian entries that can invalidate the diagonal-dominance argument even when min C_W,i > 1.

Authors: We acknowledge that the numerical validation is performed exclusively on standard IEEE test systems without enforcing voltage or current limits. The Wirtinger Jacobian and C_W index are derived under the continuous power-flow model. In the revised manuscript we will add an explicit limitations paragraph in the Case Studies section stating this scope and include a small illustrative example with artificial limit enforcement to show the effect on the index. Comprehensive validation under saturation is noted as future work. revision: partial
Referee: [Proof of singularity coincidence] Proof that alternative and conventional Jacobians share singularity points (likely §3–4): the argument relies on the power-flow equations retaining their standard structure; once converter limits are active the Jacobian changes discontinuously, so the claimed coincidence and the sufficiency of the C_W > 1 condition require explicit verification or counter-example analysis under saturation.

Authors: The algebraic proof in Sections 3–4 shows singularity coincidence by establishing equivalence of the two Jacobians for the standard (continuous) power-flow equations. When limits activate, the Jacobian becomes discontinuous and the equivalence no longer holds. We will revise the proof section to state the no-saturation assumption explicitly and note that the C_W > 1 sufficiency applies only in the unsaturated regime. revision: yes
Referee: [Derivation of C_W] Derivation of C_W (from diagonal dominance applied to the Wirtinger Jacobian): the index is obtained by applying dominance conditions to the derived Jacobian, but the manuscript does not demonstrate that the resulting C_W remains a valid nonsingularity certificate once limit-induced mode switches alter the Jacobian entries.

Authors: The C_W index follows directly from applying the diagonal-dominance criterion to the Wirtinger Jacobian matrix derived in the paper. This supplies a sufficient nonsingularity certificate only under the modeled continuous equations. We will add a clarifying remark in the derivation section that the specific dominance bounds used cease to be guaranteed once limit-induced mode switches alter the matrix entries. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved

Explicit verification or counter-example analysis of the C_W condition and singularity coincidence when converter voltage/current limits are active and induce discontinuous Jacobian changes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity detected in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper derives a Wirtinger-based power flow Jacobian from first-principles complex derivatives, applies the standard diagonal dominance theorem to obtain the bus-wise index C_W as a sufficient (not necessary) nonsingularity certificate, and separately proves that the alternative and conventional Jacobians share singularity loci under the maintained power-flow equation structure. None of these steps reduce to a fitted parameter renamed as prediction, a self-referential definition, or a load-bearing self-citation; the diagonal-dominance construction is a direct application of Gershgorin-type bounds and does not presuppose the target stability margin. Case-study validation on IEEE systems is external to the derivation itself.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the Wirtinger Jacobian being a valid reformulation of the power-flow equations under converter limits and on diagonal dominance being a sufficient (not necessary) condition for nonsingularity.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Power flow equations admit a Wirtinger derivative formulation that preserves the singularity properties of the conventional Jacobian.
Invoked to derive the explicit singularity condition and the coincidence proof.
domain assumption Diagonal dominance conditions on the Wirtinger Jacobian yield a sufficient certificate of nonsingularity.
Basis for defining the bus-wise C_W index.

invented entities (1)

C_W bus-wise voltage stability index no independent evidence
purpose: Fast non-iterative certificate of Jacobian nonsingularity
Derived directly from diagonal dominance of the Wirtinger Jacobian; no independent falsifiable prediction supplied in abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5503 in / 1471 out tokens · 52441 ms · 2026-05-13T18:41:18.471789+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

A bus-wise voltage stability index, denoted C_W, is derived from diagonal dominance conditions. The condition min_i C_{W,i} > 1 certifies the nonsingularity of the Jacobian
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We prove that the singularity of the alternative Jacobian coincides with that of the conventional one

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages

[1]

Definition and classification of power system stability – revisited & extended,

N. Hatziargyriou, J. Milanovic, C. Rahmann, V . Ajjarapu, C. A. Canizares, I. Erlich, D. J. Hill, I. A. Hiskens, I. Kamwa, and B. C. Pal, “Definition and classification of power system stability – revisited & extended,”IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 3271–3281, Jul. 2021

work page 2021
[2]

Grid-forming inverters: A critical asset for the power grid,

R. H. Lasseter, Z. Chen, and D. Pattabiraman, “Grid-forming inverters: A critical asset for the power grid,”IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Topics Power Electron., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 925–935, Jun. 2020. [3]IEEE Standard for Interconnection and Interoperability of Inverter- Based Resources (IBRs) Interconnecting with Associated Transmission Electric Power Systems, IEE...

work page 2020
[3]

Definition and classification of power system stability: Ieee/cigre joint task force on stability terms and definitions,

P. Kundur, J. Paserba, V . Ajjarapu, G. Andersson, A. Bose, C. Canizares, N. Hatziargyriou, D. Hill, A. Stankovic, C. Taylor, T. Van Cutsem, and V . Vittal, “Definition and classification of power system stability: Ieee/cigre joint task force on stability terms and definitions,”IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 1387–1401, Aug. 2004

work page 2004
[4]

Transient stability enhancement control for vsg considering power angle stability and fault current limitation,

P. Ge, F. Xiao, C. Tu, Q. Guo, J. Gao, and Y . Song, “Transient stability enhancement control for vsg considering power angle stability and fault current limitation,”CSEE J. Power Energy Syst., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 173–183, Jan. 2025

work page 2025
[5]

System frequency response model considering the influence of power system stabilizers,

D. A. Leiva Roca, P. E. Mercado, and G. E. Suvire, “System frequency response model considering the influence of power system stabilizers,” IEEE Latin Am. Trans., vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 912–920, Jun. 2022

work page 2022
[6]

Maiden voltage control analysis of hybrid power system with dynamic voltage restorer,

S. Ranjan, D. C. Das, A. Latif, N. Sinha, S. M. S. Hussain, and T. S. Ustun, “Maiden voltage control analysis of hybrid power system with dynamic voltage restorer,”IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 60 531–60 542, May 2021

work page 2021
[7]

Van Cutsem and C

T. Van Cutsem and C. V ournas,Voltage Stability of Electric Power Systems. Boston, MA, USA: Springer, 1998

work page 1998
[8]

The continuation power flow: a tool for steady state voltage stability analysis,

V . Ajjarapu and C. Christy, “The continuation power flow: a tool for steady state voltage stability analysis,”IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 416–423, Feb. 1992

work page 1992
[9]

Kundur,Power System Stability and Control

P. Kundur,Power System Stability and Control. New York, NY , USA: McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1994

work page 1994
[10]

Impedance modeling and analysis of grid- connected voltage-source converters,

M. Cespedes and J. Sun, “Impedance modeling and analysis of grid- connected voltage-source converters,”IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 1254–1261, Mar. 2015

work page 2015
[11]

Zhong and T

Q.-C. Zhong and T. Hornik,Control of Power Inverters in Renewable Energy and Smart Grid Integration, ser. IEEE Press Series on Power Engineering. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2012, vol. 97

work page 2012
[12]

Estimating the voltage stability of a power system,

P. Kessel and H. Glavitsch, “Estimating the voltage stability of a power system,”IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 346–354, Jul. 1986

work page 1986
[13]

Static-voltage-stability analysis of renewable energy-integrated distribu- tion power system based on impedance model index,

Y . Wang, Y . Cai, W. Li, Z. Tan, Z. Song, Y . Li, H. Bai, and T. Liu, “Static-voltage-stability analysis of renewable energy-integrated distribu- tion power system based on impedance model index,”Energies, vol. 17, no. 5, p. 1028, Mar. 2024

work page 2024
[14]

Assessing impact of renewable energy integration on system strength using site-dependent short circuit ratio,

D. Wu, G. Li, M. Javadi, A. M. Malyscheff, M. Hong, and J. N. Jiang, “Assessing impact of renewable energy integration on system strength using site-dependent short circuit ratio,”IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1072–1080, Jul. 2018

work page 2018
[15]

Load-preserving short-circuit ratio for voltage stability assessment,

H. Lan, Y . Zhang, and W. Liu, “Load-preserving short-circuit ratio for voltage stability assessment,”IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2025, early Access, to be published

work page 2025
[16]

A necessary condition for power flow insolvability in power distribution systems with distributed generators,

Z. Wang, B. Cui, and J. Wang, “A necessary condition for power flow insolvability in power distribution systems with distributed generators,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 1440–1450, Mar. 2017

work page 2017
[17]

High performance distribution network power flow using wirtinger calculus,

I. D ˇzafi´c, R. A. Jabr, and T. Hrnji ´c, “High performance distribution network power flow using wirtinger calculus,”IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 3311–3319, May 2019

work page 2019
[18]

Utilizing full degrees of freedom of control in voltage source inverters to support micro-grid with symmetric and asymmetric voltage require- ments,

A. Rasool, F. Ahmad, M. S. Fakhar, S. A. R. Kashif, and E. Matlotse, “Utilizing full degrees of freedom of control in voltage source inverters to support micro-grid with symmetric and asymmetric voltage require- ments,”Symmetry, vol. 15, no. 4, p. 865, Apr. 2023

work page 2023
[19]

A novel approach for grid-connected inverter operation based on selective harmonic elimination,

C. Poongothai and K. Vasudevan, “A novel approach for grid-connected inverter operation based on selective harmonic elimination,”Int. Trans. Electr. Energy Syst., vol. 31, no. 10, p. e12679, Oct. 2021

work page 2021
[20]

Stability constrained optimization in high ibr- penetrated power systems—part i: Constraint development and unifica- tion,

Z. Chu and F. Teng, “Stability constrained optimization in high ibr- penetrated power systems—part i: Constraint development and unifica- tion,”arXiv preprint, 2023, arXiv:2307.12151

work page arXiv 2023
[21]

Power system steady-state stability and the load-flow jacobian,

P. W. Sauer and M. A. Pai, “Power system steady-state stability and the load-flow jacobian,”IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1374– 1383, Nov. 1990

work page 1990
[22]

V oltage stability evaluation using modal analysis,

B. Gao, G. K. Morison, and P. Kundur, “V oltage stability evaluation using modal analysis,”IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 1529– 1542, Nov. 1992

work page 1992
[23]

R. A. Horn and C. R. Johnson,Matrix Analysis, 2nd ed. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013

work page 2013
[24]

Mat- power: Steady-state operations, planning, and analysis tools for power systems research and education,

R. D. Zimmerman, C. E. Murillo-S ´anchez, and R. J. Thomas, “Mat- power: Steady-state operations, planning, and analysis tools for power systems research and education,”IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 12–19, Feb. 2011

work page 2011
[25]

Xie and J

X. Xie and J. Shair,Oscillatory Stability of Converter-Dominated Power Systems, ser. Power Systems. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024

work page 2024
[26]

Mechanism and characteristic analyses of subsynchronous oscillations caused by the interactions between direct-drive wind turbines and weak ac power systems,

W. Liu, X. Xie, H. Liu, C. Zhang, and Y . Wang, “Mechanism and characteristic analyses of subsynchronous oscillations caused by the interactions between direct-drive wind turbines and weak ac power systems,”J. Eng., vol. 2017, no. 13, pp. 1651–1656, 2017

work page 2017
[27]

A practical method for the direct analysis of transient stability,

T. Athay, R. Podmore, and S. Virmani, “A practical method for the direct analysis of transient stability,”IEEE Trans. Power App. Syst., vol. PAS-98, no. 2, pp. 573–584, Mar. 1979

work page 1979
[28]

Control of power converters in AC microgrids,

J. Rocabert, A. Luna, F. Blaabjerg, and P. Rodr ´ıguez, “Control of power converters in AC microgrids,”IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 4734–4749, Nov. 2012

work page 2012
[29]

Frequency stability of synchronous machines and grid-forming power converters,

A. Tayyebi, D. Gross, A. Anta, F. Kupzog, and F. D ¨orfler, “Frequency stability of synchronous machines and grid-forming power converters,” IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Topics Power Electron., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 1004– 1018, Jun. 2020

work page 2020
[30]

Grid forming technology: Bulk power system reliability considerations,

NERC, “Grid forming technology: Bulk power system reliability considerations,” North American Electric Reliability Corporation, Tech. Rep., 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.nerc.com

work page 2021
[31]

Wirtinger’s cal- culus for the load flow in power distribution grids,

A. Garc ´es, W. Gil-Gonz ´alez, and O. D. Montoya, “Wirtinger’s cal- culus for the load flow in power distribution grids,” inProc. IEEE ANDESCON, Aug. 2018, pp. 1–5

work page 2018
[32]

A complex gradient operator and its application in adaptive array theory,

D. H. Brandwood, “A complex gradient operator and its application in adaptive array theory,” inIEE Proc. F—Commun., Radar Signal Process., vol. 130, no. 1, Feb. 1983, pp. 11–16

work page 1983
[33]

The complex gradient operator and the CR- calculus,

K. Kreutz-Delgado, “The complex gradient operator and the CR- calculus,” arXiv preprint arXiv:0906.4835, 2009. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/0906.4835

work page arXiv 2009
[34]

Hjørungnes,Complex-Valued Matrix Derivatives: With Applications in Signal Processing and Communications

A. Hjørungnes,Complex-Valued Matrix Derivatives: With Applications in Signal Processing and Communications. Cambridge, U.K.: Cam- bridge University Press, 2011

work page 2011