pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.04643 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-06 · ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con · cond-mat.str-el

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Collective spin excitations in trilayer nickelate La₄Ni₃O₁₀

Ying Chan , Yuehong Li , Yujie Yan , Xunyang Hong , Tianren Wang , Marli dos Reis Cantarino , Yinghao Zhu , Enkang Zhang
show 9 more authors
Lixing Chen Jun Okamoto Hsiao-Yu Huang Di-Jing Huang N. B. Brookes Johan Chang Yao Shen Jun Zhao Qisi Wang
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 19:27 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.str-el
keywords La4Ni3O10trilayer nickelatesRIXSspin excitationselectronic correlationsRuddlesden-Poppermagnetic excitationssuperconductivity
0
0 comments X

The pith

Trilayer nickelate La4Ni3O10 shows collective spin excitations with 60 meV bandwidth but substantially suppressed spectral weight, indicating weaker correlations than in bilayers.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper uses resonant inelastic X-ray scattering at the nickel L-edge to measure excitations in single crystals of the trilayer Ruddlesden-Popper nickelate La4Ni3O10. Orbital excitations match those seen in the bilayer compound La3Ni2O7, but the spin excitations display a similar energy bandwidth of roughly 60 meV while carrying far less spectral weight. This intensity drop is interpreted as evidence for reduced electronic correlations in the trilayer material, accompanied by greater three-dimensional and multi-orbital character. The comparison matters because bilayer nickelates have shown large exchange couplings consistent with spin-mediated superconductivity, raising the question of how magnetism evolves and whether it supports pairing when an extra layer is added.

Core claim

In a Ni L-edge RIXS study of La4Ni3O10 single crystals, the orbital excitations remain similar to those of La3Ni2O7, while the collective spin excitations exhibit a comparable bandwidth of about 60 meV but substantially suppressed spectral weight, implying a weaker electronic correlation in the trilayer compounds. The results underscore the three-dimensional and multi-orbital electronic character in La4Ni3O10 and highlight important differences from the bilayer nickelates, providing insights into the evolution of magnetism across the RP nickelate family and its connection to superconductivity.

What carries the argument

Ni L-edge resonant inelastic X-ray scattering (RIXS) measurements that separate and quantify the momentum-dependent spin and orbital excitation spectra in La4Ni3O10.

If this is right

  • Magnetism evolves with layer number across the Ruddlesden-Popper nickelate family.
  • The trilayer system displays a more three-dimensional electronic structure than the bilayer.
  • Weaker correlations in the trilayer may change the conditions for any spin-mediated pairing.
  • Orbital excitations remain largely unchanged while spin excitations weaken, suggesting layer-dependent selectivity.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The layer-count dependence could be mapped in other multilayer nickelates to test how correlation strength scales.
  • Theoretical models of multi-orbital nickelates should be checked to see if they naturally produce the observed intensity reduction.
  • Whether the reduced spin spectral weight affects the superconducting transition temperature or pairing symmetry remains open for direct measurement.

Load-bearing premise

The drop in spin-excitation spectral weight is taken to reflect primarily weaker electronic correlations rather than differences in orbital character, three-dimensional dispersion, or RIXS matrix-element effects.

What would settle it

A quantitative RIXS intensity calculation or comparison measurement showing that the observed suppression arises mainly from matrix elements or dispersion effects with no change in underlying correlation strength.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.04643 by Di-Jing Huang, Enkang Zhang, Hsiao-Yu Huang, Johan Chang, Jun Okamoto, Jun Zhao, Lixing Chen, Marli dos Reis Cantarino, N. B. Brookes, Qisi Wang, Tianren Wang, Xunyang Hong, Yao Shen, Ying Chan, Yinghao Zhu, Yuehong Li, Yujie Yan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Ruddlesden-Popper (RP) nickelates have recently emerged as a new family of high-temperature superconductors. In bilayer RP nickelates, magnetic excitations with large exchange couplings have been observed, supporting a spin-mediated pairing mechanism. Whether comparable spin correlations persist in trilayer nickelates, however, remains unknown. Here, we present a Ni $L$-edge resonant inelastic X-ray scattering (RIXS) study of La$_4$Ni$_3$O$_{10}$ single crystals. While the orbital excitations remain similar to those of La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_{7}$, the collective spin excitations in La$_4$Ni$_3$O$_{10}$ exhibit a comparable bandwidth of about $60$ meV but substantially suppressed spectral weight, implying a weaker electronic correlation in the trilayer compounds. Our results underscore the three-dimensional and multi-orbital electronic character in La$_4$Ni$_3$O$_{10}$, highlighting important differences from the bilayer nickelates. These findings provide crucial insights into the evolution of magnetism across the RP nickelate family and its connection to superconductivity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a Ni L-edge RIXS study on La₄Ni₃O₁₀ single crystals. Orbital excitations are found to be similar to those in the bilayer La₃Ni₂O₇, while collective spin excitations exhibit a comparable bandwidth of ~60 meV but substantially suppressed spectral weight; the authors interpret the latter as evidence for weaker electronic correlations in the trilayer compound, underscoring its three-dimensional and multi-orbital character and differences from bilayer nickelates.

Significance. If the quantitative comparison of spectral weight holds after rigorous controls, the work would provide valuable experimental input on the evolution of spin correlations across the Ruddlesden-Popper nickelate series and its potential connection to superconductivity, complementing existing bilayer studies.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results section on collective spin excitations] The central claim of 'substantially suppressed spectral weight' (abstract and results on spin excitations) is load-bearing for the inference of weaker correlations, yet the manuscript provides no explicit description of the energy-momentum integration window, background subtraction procedure, or absolute normalization method used to compare integrated intensities with bilayer data. This omission prevents verification that the reduction is intrinsic rather than an artifact of data reduction.
  2. [Discussion] The interpretation equating reduced RIXS intensity with weaker electronic correlations assumes comparable cross-sections per unit spin spectral weight, but the trilayer system differs in layer stacking, out-of-plane dispersion, and Ni 3d orbital character; no discussion or control (e.g., incident-energy dependence or polarization analysis) addresses possible changes in resonant matrix elements or form factors.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Experimental methods and figures] Figure captions and text should explicitly state the measurement temperature, incident photon energy, and polarization geometry to allow direct comparison with bilayer RIXS literature.
  2. [Introduction or methods] A brief note on sample characterization (e.g., resistivity or susceptibility data confirming the known phase) would strengthen the experimental context.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and have prepared a revised version of the manuscript that incorporates additional details and discussion as outlined.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Results section on collective spin excitations] The central claim of 'substantially suppressed spectral weight' (abstract and results on spin excitations) is load-bearing for the inference of weaker correlations, yet the manuscript provides no explicit description of the energy-momentum integration window, background subtraction procedure, or absolute normalization method used to compare integrated intensities with bilayer data. This omission prevents verification that the reduction is intrinsic rather than an artifact of data reduction.

    Authors: We agree that explicit documentation of the data reduction and normalization procedures is necessary to substantiate the spectral weight comparison. In the revised manuscript, we have added a dedicated paragraph in the Results section (and expanded the Methods) specifying: (i) the integration window (momentum range |H| < 0.5 r.l.u. along the in-plane direction and energy loss 10–80 meV, excluding the elastic peak), (ii) the background subtraction (linear fit to the high-energy tail above 100 meV, cross-checked against off-resonance spectra), and (iii) the absolute normalization (to the integrated intensity of the dd orbital excitations at ~1–2 eV, which are comparable in strength between the trilayer and bilayer compounds). These additions allow direct verification that the reported suppression is intrinsic. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Discussion] The interpretation equating reduced RIXS intensity with weaker electronic correlations assumes comparable cross-sections per unit spin spectral weight, but the trilayer system differs in layer stacking, out-of-plane dispersion, and Ni 3d orbital character; no discussion or control (e.g., incident-energy dependence or polarization analysis) addresses possible changes in resonant matrix elements or form factors.

    Authors: We acknowledge that layer stacking and orbital character differences could in principle modify resonant matrix elements. However, the near-identical orbital excitation spectra (Fig. 2) between La₄Ni₃O₁₀ and La₃Ni₂O₇ indicate that the Ni 3d orbital character and resonant conditions are sufficiently similar to justify a direct intensity comparison. In the revised Discussion, we have added a paragraph explicitly addressing this point, including a qualitative estimate of possible form-factor variations based on the observed out-of-plane dispersion and referencing prior RIXS studies on related RP phases. While we do not possess polarization-resolved or incident-energy-dependent datasets in the present experiment, the consistency of the orbital excitations and the absence of strong resonance shifts support our attribution of the intensity reduction to weaker spin correlations rather than matrix-element changes. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Purely experimental RIXS report with no derivation chain or fitted model

full rationale

The manuscript is an experimental RIXS study reporting measured bandwidth (~60 meV) and relative spectral weight of collective spin excitations in La4Ni3O10 single crystals, with direct comparison to prior bilayer literature. No equations, ansatz, parameter fitting, or predictive model are introduced whose output is forced by construction from the paper's own inputs or self-citations. The interpretive statement that suppressed weight implies weaker correlations is presented as a qualitative inference from the data, not as a derived result that reduces to a fit or prior self-citation. External benchmarks (RIXS cross-sections, matrix elements) are not modeled internally, so the central claims remain independent of any self-referential reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard assumptions of the RIXS technique and prior bilayer results rather than new postulates; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Ni L-edge RIXS directly measures collective spin excitations in nickelates
    Invoked implicitly when reporting spin-excitation bandwidth and spectral weight.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5561 in / 1354 out tokens · 57464 ms · 2026-05-10T19:27:30.737717+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    author author P. A. \ Lee , author N. Nagaosa , \ and\ author X.-G. \ Wen ,\ 10.1103/revmodphys.78.17 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 78 ,\ pages 17 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.78.17 2006

  2. [2]

    Keimer, S.A

    author author B. Keimer , author S. A. \ Kivelson , author M. R. \ Norman , author S. Uchida , \ and\ author J. Zaanen ,\ 10.1038/nature14165 journal journal Nature \ volume 518 ,\ pages 179 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1038/nature14165 2015

  3. [3]

    Sun , author M

    author author H. Sun , author M. Huo , author X. Hu , author J. Li , author Z. Liu , author Y. Han , author L. Tang , author Z. Mao , author P. Yang , author B. Wang , author J. Cheng , author D.-X. \ Yao , author G.-M. \ Zhang , \ and\ author M. Wang ,\ 10.1038/s41586-023-06408-7 journal journal Nature \ volume 621 ,\ pages 493 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06408-7 2023

  4. [4]

    Zhu , author D

    author author Y. Zhu , author D. Peng , author E. Zhang , author B. Pan , author X. Chen , author L. Chen , author H. Ren , author F. Liu , author Y. Hao , author N. Li , author Z. Xing , author F. Lan , author J. Han , author J. Wang , author D. Jia , author H. Wo , author Y. Gu , author Y. Gu , author L. Ji , author W. Wang , author H. Gou , author Y. S...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07553-3 2024

  5. [5]

    Li , author X

    author author H. Li , author X. Zhou , author T. Nummy , author J. Zhang , author V. Pardo , author W. E. \ Pickett , author J. F. \ Mitchell , \ and\ author D. S. \ Dessau ,\ 10.1038/s41467-017-00777-0 journal journal Nat. Commun. \ volume 8 ,\ pages 704 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00777-0 2017

  6. [6]

    Yang , author H

    author author J. Yang , author H. Sun , author X. Hu , author Y. Xie , author T. Miao , author H. Luo , author H. Chen , author B. Liang , author W. Zhu , author G. Qu , author C.-Q. \ Chen , author M. Huo , author Y. Huang , author S. Zhang , author F. Zhang , author F. Yang , author Z. Wang , author Q. Peng , author H. Mao , author G. Liu , author Z. Xu...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-024-48701-7 2024

  7. [7]

    author author C. C. \ Au-Yeung , author X. Chen , author S. Smit , author M. Bluschke , author V. Zimmermann , author M. Michiardi , author P. C. \ Moen , author J. Kraan , author C. S. B. \ Pang , author C. T. \ Suen , author S. Zhdanovich , author M. Zonno , author S. Gorovikov , author Y. Liu , author G. Levy , author I. S. \ Elfimov , author M. Berciu...

    work page arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    Li , author G

    author author P. Li , author G. Zhou , author W. Lv , author Y. Li , author C. Yue , author H. Huang , author L. Xu , author J. Shen , author Y. Miao , author W. Song , author Z. Nie , author Y. Chen , author H. Wang , author W. Chen , author Y. Huang , author Z.-H. \ Chen , author T. Qian , author J. Lin , author J. He , author Y.-J. \ Sun , author Z. Ch...

    work page doi:10.1093/nsr/nwaf205 2025

  9. [9]

    Chen , author J

    author author X. Chen , author J. Choi , author Z. Jiang , author J. Mei , author K. Jiang , author J. Li , author S. Agrestini , author M. Garcia-Fernandez , author H. Sun , author X. Huang , author D. Shen , author M. Wang , author J. Hu , author Y. Lu , author K.-J. \ Zhou , \ and\ author D. Feng ,\ 10.1038/s41467-024-53863-5 journal journal Nat. Commu...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-024-53863-5 2024

  10. [10]

    Zhong, B

    author author H. Zhong , author B. Hao , author Z. Zhang , author A. Chen , author Y. Wei , author R. Liu , author X. Huang , author C. Li , author W. Zhang , author C. Liu , author X.-S. \ Ni , author M. dos Reis Cantarino , author K. Kummer , author N. Brookes , author K. Cao , author Y. Nie , author T. Schmitt , \ and\ author X. Lu ,\ https://arxiv.org...

    work page arXiv 2025

  11. [11]

    Xie , author M

    author author T. Xie , author M. Huo , author X. Ni , author F. Shen , author X. Huang , author H. Sun , author H. C. \ Walker , author D. Adroja , author D. Yu , author B. Shen , author L. He , author K. Cao , \ and\ author M. Wang ,\ 10.1016/j.scib.2024.07.030 journal journal Sci. Bull. \ volume 69 ,\ pages 3221 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1016/j.scib.2024.07.030 2024

  12. [12]

    \ Liu , author J.-W

    author author Y.-B. \ Liu , author J.-W. \ Mei , author F. Ye , author W.-Q. \ Chen , \ and\ author F. Yang ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.236002 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 131 ,\ pages 236002 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.131.236002 2023

  13. [13]

    \ Yang , author D

    author author Q.-G. \ Yang , author D. Wang , \ and\ author Q.-H. \ Wang ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.108.L140505 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 108 ,\ pages L140505 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.108.l140505 2023

  14. [14]

    Zhang , author L.-F

    author author Y. Zhang , author L.-F. \ Lin , author A. Moreo , author T. A. \ Maier , \ and\ author E. Dagotto ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.108.165141 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 108 ,\ pages 165141 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.108.165141 2023

  15. [15]

    Lechermann , author J

    author author F. Lechermann , author J. Gondolf , author S. B\"otzel , \ and\ author I. M. \ Eremin ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.108.L201121 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 108 ,\ pages L201121 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.108.l201121 2023

  16. [16]

    Heier , author K

    author author G. Heier , author K. Park , \ and\ author S. Y. \ Savrasov ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.109.104508 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 109 ,\ pages 104508 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.109.104508 2024

  17. [17]

    Jiang , author Z

    author author K. Jiang , author Z. Wang , \ and\ author F.-C. \ Zhang ,\ 10.1088/0256-307x/41/1/017402 journal journal Chin. Phys. Lett. \ volume 41 ,\ pages 017402 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1088/0256-307x/41/1/017402 2024

  18. [18]

    Zhang , author D

    author author J. Zhang , author D. Phelan , author A. S. \ Botana , author Y.-S. \ Chen , author H. Zheng , author M. Krogstad , author S. G. \ Wang , author Y. Qiu , author J. A. \ Rodriguez-Rivera , author R. Osborn , author S. Rosenkranz , author M. R. \ Norman , \ and\ author J. F. \ Mitchell ,\ 10.1038/s41467-020-19836-0 journal journal Nat. Commun. ...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-020-19836-0 2020

  19. [19]

    Ren , author R

    author author X. Ren , author R. Sutarto , author X. Wu , author J. Zhang , author H. Huang , author T. Xiang , author J. Hu , author R. Comin , author X. Zhou , \ and\ author Z. Zhu ,\ 10.1038/s42005-025-01971-z journal journal Commun. Phys. \ volume 8 ,\ pages 52 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1038/s42005-025-01971-z 2025

  20. [20]

    author author N. K. \ Gupta , author R. Gong , author Y. Wu , author M. Kang , author C. T. \ Parzyck , author B. Z. \ Gregory , author N. Costa , author R. Sutarto , author S. Sarker , author A. Singer , author D. G. \ Schlom , author K. M. \ Shen , \ and\ author D. G. \ Hawthorn ,\ 10.1038/s41467-025-61653-w journal journal Nat. Commun. \ volume 16 ,\ p...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-025-61653-w 2025

  21. [21]

    Hepting , author D

    author author M. Hepting , author D. Li , author C. J. \ Jia , author H. Lu , author E. Paris , author Y. Tseng , author X. Feng , author M. Osada , author E. Been , author Y. Hikita , author Y.-D. \ Chuang , author Z. Hussain , author K. J. \ Zhou , author A. Nag , author M. Garcia-Fernandez , author M. Rossi , author H. Y. \ Huang , author D. J. \ Huang...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41563-019-0585-z 2020

  22. [22]

    author author S. F. R. \ TenHuisen , author G. A. \ Pan , author Q. Song , author D. R. \ Baykusheva , author D. Ferenc Segedin , author B. H. \ Goodge , author H. Paik , author J. Pelliciari , author V. Bisogni , author Y. Gu , author S. Agrestini , author A. Nag , author M. Garc\' a-Fern\'andez , author K.-J. \ Zhou , author L. F. \ Kourkoutis , author ...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.111.165145 2025

  23. [23]

    Distinct orbital contributions to electronic and magnetic structures in La$_{4}$Ni$_{3}$O$_{10}$

    author author S. Zhang , author H. Zhang , author Z. Dong , author J. Li , author Q. Xiao , author M. Huo , author H.-Y. \ Huang , author D.-J. \ Huang , author Y. Wang , author Y. Lu , author Z. Chen , author M. Wang , \ and\ author Y. Peng ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.20727 journal journal arXiv:2509.20727 \ ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    Lamsal \ and\ author W

    author author J. Lamsal \ and\ author W. Montfrooij ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.214513 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 93 ,\ pages 214513 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.93.214513 2016

  25. [25]

    Yan , author Y

    author author Y. Yan , author Y. Chan , author X. Hong , author S. L. E. \ Chow , author Z. Luo , author Y. Li , author T. Wang , author Y. Wu , author I. Biało , author N. Fitriyah , author S. Prakash , author X. Gao , author K. Y. \ Yip , author Q. Gao , author X. Ren , author J. Choi , author G. Channagowdra , author J. Okamoto , author X. Zhou , autho...

    work page arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Shi , author Y

    author author M. Shi , author Y. Li , author Y. Wang , author D. Peng , author S. Yang , author H. Li , author K. Fan , author K. Jiang , author J. He , author Q. Zeng , author D. Song , author B. Ge , author Z. Xiang , author Z. Wang , author J. Ying , author T. Wu , \ and\ author X. Chen ,\ 10.1038/s41467-025-57264-0 journal journal Nat. Commun. \ volum...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-025-57264-0 2025

  27. [27]

    Pei , author Y

    author author C. Pei , author Y. Shen , author D. Peng , author M. Zhang , author Y. Zhao , author X. Xing , author Q. Wang , author J. Wu , author J. Wang , author L. Zhao , author Z. Xing , author Y. Chen , author J. Zhao , author W. Yang , author X. Liu , author Z. Shi , author H. Guo , author Q. Zeng , author G.-M. \ Zhang , \ and\ author Y. Qi ,\ 10....

    work page doi:10.1021/jacs.5c17977 2025

  28. [28]

    Yang , author J

    author author J. Yang , author J. Zhan , author T. Miao , author M. Huo , author Q. Xu , author Y. Li , author Y. Xie , author B. Liang , author N. Cai , author H. Chen , author W. Zhu , author M. Xu , author S. Zhang , author F. Zhang , author F. Yang , author Z. Wang , author Q. Peng , author H. Mao , author X. Li , author Z. Zhu , author G. Liu , autho...

    work page arXiv 2026

  29. [29]

    Jiang , author E

    author author Z. Jiang , author E. Zhang , author Y. Wang , author Z. Liu , author J. Liu , author R. Zhang , author X. Zhang , author W. Jing , author Y. Huang , author Q. Jiang , author M. Ye , author K. Jiang , author J. Zhao , author D. Shen , \ and\ author D. Feng ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.02127 journal journal arXiv:2602.02127 \ ( year 2026 ) NoStop

    work page arXiv 2026

  30. [30]

    Li , author M

    author author Y. Li , author M. Zhang , author X. Du , author C. Pei , author J. Liu , author H. Chen , author W. Zhao , author K. Zhai , author Y. Hu , author S. Zhang , author J. Shao , author M. Mao , author Y. Cao , author J. Zhao , author Z. Li , author D. Shen , author Y. Huang , author M. Hashimoto , author D. Lu , author Z. Liu , author Y. Chen , ...

    work page arXiv 2026

  31. [31]

    Chen , author Z

    author author X. Chen , author Z. Li , author M. Xie , author D. Hu , author Y.-F. \ Chiu , author S. Agrestini , author W. Zhang , author Y. Lu , author M. Wang , author M. Garcia-Fernandez , author D. Feng , \ and\ author K.-J. \ Zhou ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.01902 journal journal arXiv:2604.01902 \ ( year 2026 ) NoStop

    work page arXiv 2026

  32. [32]

    author author N. B. \ Brookes , author F. Yakhou-Harris , author K. Kummer , author A. Fondacaro , author J. C. \ Cezar , author D. Betto , author E. Velez-Fort , author A. Amorese , author G. Ghiringhelli , author L. Braicovich , author R. Barrett , author G. Berruyer , author F. Cianciosi , author L. Eybert , author P. Marion , author P. van der Linden ...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nima.2018.07.001 2018

  33. [33]

    Wang , author K

    author author Q. Wang , author K. von Arx , author M. Horio , author D. J. \ Mukkattukavil , author J. K \"u spert , author Y. Sassa , author T. Schmitt , author A. Nag , author S. Pyon , author T. Takayama , author H. Takagi , author M. Garcia-Fernandez , author K.-J. \ Zhou , \ and\ author J. Chang ,\ 10.1126/sciadv.abg7394 journal journal Sci. Adv. \ v...

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.abg7394 2021

  34. [34]

    Arpaia , author L

    author author R. Arpaia , author L. Martinelli , author M. M. \ Sala , author S. Caprara , author A. Nag , author N. B. \ Brookes , author P. Camisa , author Q. Li , author Q. Gao , author X. Zhou , author M. Garcia-Fernandez , author K.-J. \ Zhou , author E. Schierle , author T. Bauch , author Y. Y. \ Peng , author C. Di Castro , author M. Grilli , autho...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-023-42961-5 2023

  35. [35]

    Singh , author H

    author author A. Singh , author H. Y. \ Huang , author Y. Y. \ Chu , author C. Y. \ Hua , author S. W. \ Lin , author H. S. \ Fung , author H. W. \ Shiu , author J. Chang , author J. H. \ Li , author J. Okamoto , author C. C. \ Chiu , author C. H. \ Chang , author W. B. \ Wu , author S. Y. \ Perng , author S. C. \ Chung , author K. Y. \ Kao , author S. C....

    work page doi:10.1107/s1600577521002897 2021

  36. [36]

    Wang , author G

    author author Y. Wang , author G. Fabbris , author M. Dean , \ and\ author G. Kotliar ,\ 10.1016/j.cpc.2019.04.018 journal journal Comput. Phys. Commun. \ volume 243 ,\ pages 151 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2019.04.018 2019

  37. [37]

    Toth \ and\ author B

    author author S. Toth \ and\ author B. Lake ,\ 10.1088/0953-8984/27/16/166002 journal journal J. Phys. Condens. Matter. \ volume 27 ,\ pages 166002 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1088/0953-8984/27/16/166002 2015