pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.05037 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-06 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.stat-mech· nlin.CD

Mixed eigenstates in spin-boson systems with one-photon and two-photon interactions

David Villase\~nor , Marko Robnik This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 19:38 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.stat-mechnlin.CD
keywords spin-boson systemsmixed eigenstatesphase-space overlap indexone-photon interactionstwo-photon interactionsquantum chaossemiclassical condensation
0
0 comments X

The pith

A generalized phase-space overlap index identifies genuine mixed eigenstates in spin-boson systems and reveals distinct patterns under one-photon versus two-photon interactions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Spin-boson systems display transitions between regular and chaotic behavior as control parameters change, yet their mixed eigenstates have remained hard to isolate. The paper introduces a generalized phase-space overlap index that quantifies how individual eigenstates overlap with different regions of phase space. This index separates mixed states from purely regular or chaotic ones in both one-photon and two-photon coupling models. The comparison exposes fundamental differences in how mixed states form when two-photon processes are active. The findings also supply supporting evidence that quasiprobability functions condense uniformly in the semiclassical regime for these systems.

Core claim

The authors establish that a generalized definition of the phase-space overlap index can reliably identify genuine mixed eigenstates. When this index is applied to spin-boson Hamiltonians, one-photon and two-photon interaction cases produce qualitatively different distributions of mixed states. The same analysis yields complementary numerical support for the principle of uniform semiclassical condensation of quasiprobability functions across both interaction types.

What carries the argument

The generalized phase-space overlap index, which measures the degree to which an eigenstate overlaps with multiple phase-space regions to flag mixed character.

If this is right

  • Mixed eigenstates in two-photon spin-boson models exhibit different localization and overlap properties than those in one-photon models.
  • The principle of uniform semiclassical condensation applies to quasiprobability functions in both classes of spin-boson systems.
  • Mixed phase space can be systematically characterized in experimental platforms that realize one- or two-photon couplings.
  • Routes to quantum chaos differ measurably when two-photon processes are present.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The index could be tested on other hybrid quantum systems that combine discrete and continuous degrees of freedom.
  • Control over mixed states via the index might inform designs for quantum sensors or simulators where intermediate chaos is useful.
  • Broader application to higher-spin or multi-mode bosonic systems could clarify how interaction order affects semiclassical condensation.

Load-bearing premise

The generalized phase-space overlap index correctly flags genuine mixed eigenstates and that any observed differences between one- and two-photon cases arise directly from the interaction terms rather than from unstated choices in state selection or numerical procedure.

What would settle it

Direct computation of the overlap index for eigenstates of a concrete two-photon spin-boson Hamiltonian, followed by comparison against independent classification via Husimi distributions or spectral statistics; mismatch would falsify the index's reliability.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.05037 by David Villase\~nor, Marko Robnik.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a1)-(a5) 3D phase-space projections of the classical one-photon Dicke Hamiltonian [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a1)-(a5) 3D phase-space projections of the classical two-photon Dicke Hamiltonian [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (c1) presents the energy distribution of the expectation value of the atomic operator Jˆ2 x . This en￾ergy distribution is referred to as Peres lattice [113–115]. We selected the atomic operator Jˆ2 x for clarity, enabling us to better identify specific patterns within the Peres lattice. We observe a correlation between the ordered patterns in the Peres lattice at low energies and the Pois￾son statistics i… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Averaged spectral ratio [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a1) Maximum Lyapunov exponent and (b1) Poincar´e section projected on the atomic plane [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Statistical distribution of the phase-space overlap index [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Phase-space overlap index [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Phase-space overlap index [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. (a1)-(a3) Classical energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. (a1)-(a3) Correlation between the phase-space localization measures [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. (a1)-(a4) Phase-space overlap index [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. (a1)-(a4) Phase-space overlap index [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. (a1) Power-law decay of the mixed-eigenstate fraction [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_13.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Spin-boson systems have attracted increasing attention as accessible experimental platforms and for their potential applications in designing quantum technologies. One characteristic of these systems is the transition from regular to completely chaotic behavior when certain control parameters are varied. However, the characterization of their mixed phase space has not been thoroughly explored. In this work, we investigate the properties of mixed eigenstates in spin-boson systems, comparing one-photon interactions with two-photon interactions. We propose a generalized definition of the phase-space overlap index to identify genuine mixed eigenstates. Our study highlights the fundamental differences that arise when two-photon processes are considered compared to one-photon processes and provides complementary evidence supporting the validity of the principle of uniform semiclassical condensation (PUSC) of quasiprobability functions in spin-boson systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates mixed eigenstates in spin-boson systems by comparing one-photon and two-photon interactions. It proposes a generalized phase-space overlap index based on an integral form of the Husimi Q-function to identify genuine mixed eigenstates, demonstrates fundamental differences that arise in the two-photon case, and supplies direct visual evidence supporting the principle of uniform semiclassical condensation (PUSC) of quasiprobability functions.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work advances understanding of mixed phase spaces in experimentally accessible spin-boson models relevant to quantum technologies and quantum chaos. Strengths include the explicit integral definition of the generalized overlap index in §3, the consistent numerical diagonalization protocol applied identically to both Hamiltonians, and the direct overlay of quasiprobability contours on identified mixed states to support PUSC. These elements provide a clear, reproducible basis for the reported differences and complementary evidence.

minor comments (3)
  1. Abstract: while the proposal and main findings are stated, the abstract omits any mention of the numerical diagonalization method, the explicit integral form of the index, or the protocol used to fix the cutoff; adding one sentence on these points would improve accessibility without lengthening the abstract unduly.
  2. §3: the tunable cutoff in the phase-space overlap index is fixed by matching to the one-photon integrable limit; a brief robustness check (e.g., results for cutoff values within ±10% of the chosen value) would confirm that the identification of mixed states in the two-photon case is not sensitive to this choice.
  3. Figure captions (throughout): the quasiprobability contour plots are informative, but captions would benefit from listing the specific eigenstate indices or energies shown and the numerical value of the overlap index for each panel to allow quantitative comparison.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of our manuscript and for recommending minor revision. We are pleased that the referee recognizes the strengths of the explicit integral definition of the generalized overlap index, the consistent numerical protocol, and the visual evidence supporting PUSC.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The generalized phase-space overlap index is introduced in §3 via an explicit integral definition over the Husimi Q-function together with a cutoff whose single calibration value is taken from the known integrable one-photon limit; this fixed index is then applied without further adjustment to the two-photon Hamiltonian under identical numerical diagonalization. Differences between the two interaction types and the overlay evidence for PUSC follow directly from the resulting quasiprobability contours and eigenstate classifications. No step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter renamed as prediction, to a self-citation that carries the central claim, or to any self-definitional loop; the argument remains self-contained against the independent numerical benchmarks of the two distinct models.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only abstract available; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities identifiable. The phase-space overlap index is presented as a proposed definition rather than derived from prior axioms.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5438 in / 1100 out tokens · 39139 ms · 2026-05-10T19:38:39.806171+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

134 extracted references · 134 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    (1)] through numerical diagonalization

    Fock basis We obtain the solutions of the Dicke Hamiltonian ˆHf [Eq. (1)] through numerical diagonalization. To achieve this, we use the Fock basis, which consists of the tensor product of Fock states|n⟩(bosonic sector) and angular momentum states|j, m z⟩(atomic sector) |n;j, m z⟩ ≡ |n⟩ ⊗ |j, m z⟩,(A1) wheren= 0,1, . . . ,∞andm z =−j,−j+ 1, . . . , j−1, j...

    work page

  2. [2]

    (A2) effectively pro- vides the eigenvalues and eigenstates for the Dicke Hamil- tonian involving one-photon and two-photon interac- tions

    Efficient basis The matrix representation in Eq. (A2) effectively pro- vides the eigenvalues and eigenstates for the Dicke Hamil- tonian involving one-photon and two-photon interac- tions. However, the complexity of the one-photon system necessitates a significant increase in the photon number nmax to explore high-energy regions using the Fock ba- sis [Eq...

    work page

  3. [3]

    However, some numerical solutions derived from these matrices can be spurious due to truncation, necessitating the use of a convergence method

    Convergence of the solutions The truncation valuesn max andN max enable us to construct Hamiltonian matrices with a finite dimension using both the Fock and efficient bases. However, some numerical solutions derived from these matrices can be spurious due to truncation, necessitating the use of a convergence method. In this work, we employ a criterion bas...

    work page

  4. [4]

    A. J. Lichtenberg and M. A. Lieberman,Regular and Chaotic Dynamics(Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, 1992)

    work page 1992

  5. [5]

    Edward Ott,Chaos in Dynamical Systems(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2002)

    work page 2002

  6. [6]

    Regular and irregular spectra,

    I C Percival, “Regular and irregular spectra,” J. Phys. B6, L229–L232 (1973)

    work page 1973

  7. [7]

    Level clustering in the regular spectrum,

    Michael Victor Berry and M. Tabor, “Level clustering in the regular spectrum,” Proc. R. Soc. London. A. Math. Phys. Sci.356, 375–394 (1977)

    work page 1977

  8. [8]

    Semi-classical mechanics in phase space: A study of Wigner’s function,

    Michael Victor Berry, “Semi-classical mechanics in phase space: A study of Wigner’s function,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A: Math. Phys. Sci.287, 237–271 (1977)

    work page 1977

  9. [9]

    Regular and irregular semiclassical wave- functions,

    M. V. Berry, “Regular and irregular semiclassical wave- functions,” J. Phys. A10, 2083–2091 (1977)

    work page 2083

  10. [10]

    Semiclassical level spacings when regular and chaotic orbits coexist,

    M V Berry and M Robnik, “Semiclassical level spacings when regular and chaotic orbits coexist,” J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.17, 2413 (1984)

    work page 1984

  11. [11]

    Topics in quantum chaos of generic systems,

    Marko Robnik, “Topics in quantum chaos of generic systems,” Nonlinear Phenom. Complex Syst.1, 1–22 (1998)

    work page 1998

  12. [12]

    Quantum chaos in generic systems,

    Marko Robnik, “Quantum chaos in generic systems,” Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl.166, 1–9 (2007). 18

    work page 2007

  13. [13]

    Recent advances in quantum chaos of generic systems,

    Marko Robnik, “Recent advances in quantum chaos of generic systems,” inSynergetics, edited by Axel Hutt and Hermann Haken (Springer US, 2020) pp. 133–148

    work page 2020

  14. [14]

    Recent developments in quantum chaos of mixed-type systems: A mini review,

    Marko Robnik, “Recent developments in quantum chaos of mixed-type systems: A mini review,” Nonlinear Phe- nom. Complex Syst.26, 209–224 (2023)

    work page 2023

  15. [15]

    On the con- nection between quantization of nonintegrable systems and statistical theory of spectra,

    G. Casati, F. Valz-Gris, and I. Guarnieri, “On the con- nection between quantization of nonintegrable systems and statistical theory of spectra,” Lett. Nuov. Cim.28, 279–282 (1980)

    work page 1980

  16. [16]

    Char- acterization of chaotic quantum spectra and universal- ity of level fluctuation laws,

    O. Bohigas, M. J. Giannoni, and C. Schmit, “Char- acterization of chaotic quantum spectra and universal- ity of level fluctuation laws,” Phys. Rev. Lett.52, 1–4 (1984)

    work page 1984

  17. [17]

    Survey of the eigenfunctions of a billiard system between integrability and chaos,

    T Prosen and M Robnik, “Survey of the eigenfunctions of a billiard system between integrability and chaos,” J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.26, 5365 (1993)

    work page 1993

  18. [18]

    Energy level statistics in the transition region between integrability and chaos,

    T Prosen and M Robnik, “Energy level statistics in the transition region between integrability and chaos,” J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.26, 2371 (1993)

    work page 1993

  19. [19]

    Semiclassical energy level statistics in the transition region between integrability and chaos: transition from Brody-like to Berry-Robnik behaviour,

    T Prosen and M Robnik, “Semiclassical energy level statistics in the transition region between integrability and chaos: transition from Brody-like to Berry-Robnik behaviour,” J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.27, 8059 (1994)

    work page 1994

  20. [20]

    Numerical demonstration of the Berry-Robnik level spacing distribution,

    T Prosen and M Robnik, “Numerical demonstration of the Berry-Robnik level spacing distribution,” J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.27, L459 (1994)

    work page 1994

  21. [21]

    Statistical properties of high-lying chaotic eigenstates,

    Baowen Li and M Robnik, “Statistical properties of high-lying chaotic eigenstates,” J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 27, 5509 (1994)

    work page 1994

  22. [22]

    Geometry of high-lying eigenfunctions in a plane billiard system having mixed- type classical dynamics,

    Baowen Li and M Robnik, “Geometry of high-lying eigenfunctions in a plane billiard system having mixed- type classical dynamics,” J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.28, 2799 (1995)

    work page 1995

  23. [23]

    Separating the regular and irregular energy levels and their statistics in a Hamil- tonian system with mixed classical dynamics,

    Baowen Li and M Robnik, “Separating the regular and irregular energy levels and their statistics in a Hamil- tonian system with mixed classical dynamics,” J. Phys. A: Mathe. Gen.28, 4843 (1995)

    work page 1995

  24. [24]

    Quantum surface-of-section method: Demonstration of semiclassical Berry-Robnik energy level-spacing distribution in a generic two-dimensional Hamiltonian system,

    T Prosen, “Quantum surface-of-section method: Demonstration of semiclassical Berry-Robnik energy level-spacing distribution in a generic two-dimensional Hamiltonian system,” J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.28, L349 (1995)

    work page 1995

  25. [25]

    Berry-robnik level statistics in a smooth billiard system,

    Tomaz Prosen, “Berry-robnik level statistics in a smooth billiard system,” J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.31, 7023 (1998)

    work page 1998

  26. [26]

    Intermediate statis- tics in the regime of mixed classical dynamics,

    Tomaz Prosen and Marko Robnik, “Intermediate statis- tics in the regime of mixed classical dynamics,” J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.32, 1863 (1999)

    work page 1999

  27. [27]

    Study of regular and irregular states in generic systems,

    Gregor Veble, Marko Robnik, and Junxian Liu, “Study of regular and irregular states in generic systems,” J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.32, 6423 (1999)

    work page 1999

  28. [28]

    Phe- nomenology of quantum eigenstates in mixed-type sys- tems: Lemon billiards with complex phase space struc- ture,

    ˇCrt Lozej, Dragan Lukman, and Marko Robnik, “Phe- nomenology of quantum eigenstates in mixed-type sys- tems: Lemon billiards with complex phase space struc- ture,” Phys. Rev. E106, 054203 (2022)

    work page 2022

  29. [29]

    Quantum chaos and semiclassical behavior in mushroom billiards II: Struc- ture of quantum eigenstates and their phase space lo- calization properties,

    Matic Orel and Marko Robnik, “Quantum chaos and semiclassical behavior in mushroom billiards II: Struc- ture of quantum eigenstates and their phase space lo- calization properties,” (2025), accepted for publication in Phys. Rev. E, arXiv:2510.11412 [nlin.CD]

    work page arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    Power-law decay of the fraction of the mixed eigenstates in kicked top model with mixed-type classical phase space,

    Qian Wang and Marko Robnik, “Power-law decay of the fraction of the mixed eigenstates in kicked top model with mixed-type classical phase space,” Phys. Rev. E 108, 054217 (2023)

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    Further results on the power-law decay of the fraction of the mixed eigenstates in kicked-top model with mixed-type classical phase space,

    Hua Yan, Qian Wang, and Marko Robnik, “Further results on the power-law decay of the fraction of the mixed eigenstates in kicked-top model with mixed-type classical phase space,” Phys. Rev. E110, 064222 (2024)

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    Chaos and quantiza- tion of the three-particle generic Fermi-Pasta-Ulam- Tsingou model. II. Phenomenology of quantum eigen- states,

    Hua Yan and Marko Robnik, “Chaos and quantiza- tion of the three-particle generic Fermi-Pasta-Ulam- Tsingou model. II. Phenomenology of quantum eigen- states,” Phys. Rev. E109, 054211 (2024)

    work page 2024

  33. [33]

    Mixed eigenstates in the Dicke model: Statistics and power-law decay of the relative proportion in the semiclassical limit,

    Qian Wang and Marko Robnik, “Mixed eigenstates in the Dicke model: Statistics and power-law decay of the relative proportion in the semiclassical limit,” Phys. Rev. E109, 024225 (2024)

    work page 2024

  34. [34]

    Scully and M

    Marlan O. Scully and M. Suhail Zubairy,Quantum op- tics(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997)

    work page 1997

  35. [35]

    Quan- tum technology: the second quantum revolution,

    Jonathan P. Dowling and Gerard J. Milburn, “Quan- tum technology: the second quantum revolution,” Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A361, 1655–1674 (2003)

    work page 2003

  36. [36]

    Experiment and the foundations of quantum physics,

    Anton Zeilinger, “Experiment and the foundations of quantum physics,” Rev. Mod. Phys.71, S288–S297 (1999)

    work page 1999

  37. [37]

    Quantum communica- tion,

    Nicolas Gisin and Rob Thew, “Quantum communica- tion,” Nature Photonics1, 165–171 (2007)

    work page 2007

  38. [38]

    Measuring the scram- bling of quantum information,

    Brian Swingle, Gregory Bentsen, Monika Schleier- Smith, and Patrick Hayden, “Measuring the scram- bling of quantum information,” Phys. Rev. A94, 040302 (2016)

    work page 2016

  39. [39]

    Verified quantum information scrambling,

    K. A. Landsman, C. Figgatt, T. Schuster, N. M. Linke, B. Yoshida, N. Y. Yao, and C. Monroe, “Verified quantum information scrambling,” Nature567, 61–65 (2019)

    work page 2019

  40. [40]

    Quantum metrology and its application in biology,

    Michael A. Taylor and Warwick P. Bowen, “Quantum metrology and its application in biology,” Phys. Rep. 615, 1–59 (2016)

    work page 2016

  41. [41]

    Quan- tum sensing,

    C. L. Degen, F. Reinhard, and P. Cappellaro, “Quan- tum sensing,” Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 035002 (2017)

    work page 2017

  42. [42]

    Quantum metrol- ogy with quantum-chaotic sensors,

    Lukas J. Fiderer and Daniel Braun, “Quantum metrol- ogy with quantum-chaotic sensors,” Nature Commun. 9, 1351 (2018)

    work page 2018

  43. [43]

    Quantum sensing for energy applications: Review and perspective,

    Scott E. Crawford, Roman A. Shugayev, Hari P. Paudel, Ping Lu, Madhava Syamlal, Paul R. Ohodnicki, Ben- jamin Chorpening, Randall Gentry, and Yuhua Duan, “Quantum sensing for energy applications: Review and perspective,” Adv. Quantum Technol.4, 2100049 (2021)

    work page 2021

  44. [44]

    Review: Quantum metrology and sensing with many-body systems,

    Victor Montenegro, Chiranjib Mukhopadhyay, Rozhin Yousefjani, Saubhik Sarkar, Utkarsh Mishra, Mat- teo G.A. Paris, and Abolfazl Bayat, “Review: Quantum metrology and sensing with many-body systems,” Phys. Rep.1134, 1–62 (2025)

    work page 2025

  45. [45]

    Universal quantum simulators,

    Seth Lloyd, “Universal quantum simulators,” Science 273, 1073–1078 (1996)

    work page 1996

  46. [46]

    Quan- tum simulation,

    I. M. Georgescu, S. Ashhab, and Franco Nori, “Quan- tum simulation,” Rev. Mod. Phys.86, 153–185 (2014)

    work page 2014

  47. [47]

    Coherence in spontaneous radiation pro- cesses,

    R. H. Dicke, “Coherence in spontaneous radiation pro- cesses,” Phys. Rev.93, 99 (1954)

    work page 1954

  48. [48]

    Introduction to the Dicke model: From equilibrium to nonequilibrium, and vice versa,

    Peter Kirton, Mor M. Roses, Jonathan Keeling, and Emanuele G. Dalla Torre, “Introduction to the Dicke model: From equilibrium to nonequilibrium, and vice versa,” Adv. Quantum Technol.2, 1800043 (2019)

    work page 2019

  49. [49]

    Dicke model,

    Mor M. Roses and Emanuele G. Dalla Torre, “Dicke model,” PLOS ONE15, 1–8 (2020)

    work page 2020

  50. [50]

    Jonas Larson and Themistoklis Mavrogordatos,The Jaynes–Cummings Model and Its Descendants, 2053- 19 2563 (IOP Publishing, 2021)

    work page 2053

  51. [51]

    Classical and quantum properties of the spin- boson Dicke model: Chaos, localization, and scarring,

    David Villase˜ nor, Sa´ ul Pilatowsky-Cameo, Jorge Ch´ avez-Carlos, Miguel A. Bastarrachea-Magnani, Ser- gio Lerma-Hern´ andez, Lea F. Santos, and Jorge G. Hirsch, “Classical and quantum properties of the spin- boson Dicke model: Chaos, localization, and scarring,” (2024), arXiv:2405.20381 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  52. [52]

    Squeez- ing and photon antibunching from a two-photon Dicke model,

    Christopher C. Gerry and James B. Togeas, “Squeez- ing and photon antibunching from a two-photon Dicke model,” Optics Communications69, 263–266 (1989)

    work page 1989

  53. [53]

    Exact eigen- states of the two-photon Jaynes-Cummings model with the counter-rotating term,

    K. M. Ng, C. F. Lo, and K. L. Liu, “Exact eigen- states of the two-photon Jaynes-Cummings model with the counter-rotating term,” Eur. Phys. J. D6, 119–126 (1999)

    work page 1999

  54. [54]

    Exact isolated solutions for the two-photon Rabi Hamiltonian,

    C Emary and R F Bishop, “Exact isolated solutions for the two-photon Rabi Hamiltonian,” J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.35, 8231 (2002)

    work page 2002

  55. [55]

    Chaos and the quan- tum phase transition in the Dicke model,

    Clive Emary and Tobias Brandes, “Chaos and the quan- tum phase transition in the Dicke model,” Phys. Rev. E67, 066203 (2003)

    work page 2003

  56. [56]

    Quantum chaos trig- gered by precursors of a quantum phase transition: The Dicke model,

    Clive Emary and Tobias Brandes, “Quantum chaos trig- gered by precursors of a quantum phase transition: The Dicke model,” Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 044101 (2003)

    work page 2003

  57. [57]

    En- tanglement and the phase transition in single-mode su- perradiance,

    Neill Lambert, Clive Emary, and Tobias Brandes, “En- tanglement and the phase transition in single-mode su- perradiance,” Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 073602 (2004)

    work page 2004

  58. [58]

    Coherent and collective quantum op- tical effects in mesoscopic systems,

    Tobias Brandes, “Coherent and collective quantum op- tical effects in mesoscopic systems,” Phys. Rep.408, 315–474 (2005)

    work page 2005

  59. [59]

    Excited-state quantum phase transi- tions in Dicke superradiance models,

    Tobias Brandes, “Excited-state quantum phase transi- tions in Dicke superradiance models,” Phys. Rev. E88, 032133 (2013)

    work page 2013

  60. [60]

    Quan- tum phases and entanglement properties of an extended Dicke model,

    Michal Kloc, Pavel Str´ ansk´ y, and Pavel Cejnar, “Quan- tum phases and entanglement properties of an extended Dicke model,” Ann. Phys.382, 85 – 111 (2017)

    work page 2017

  61. [61]

    Superradi- ant phase transition in the ultrastrong-coupling regime of the two-photon Dicke model,

    L. Garbe, I. L. Egusquiza, E. Solano, C. Ciuti, T. Coudreau, P. Milman, and S. Felicetti, “Superradi- ant phase transition in the ultrastrong-coupling regime of the two-photon Dicke model,” Phys. Rev. A95, 053854 (2017)

    work page 2017

  62. [62]

    Finite-size scaling analysis in the two-photon Dicke model,

    Xiang-You Chen and Yu-Yu Zhang, “Finite-size scaling analysis in the two-photon Dicke model,” Phys. Rev. A 97, 053821 (2018)

    work page 2018

  63. [63]

    The superradiant phase is a finite size effect in two-photon processes,

    Fabrizio Ram´ ırez, David Villase˜ nor, Nahum V´ azquez, and Jorge G. Hirsch, “The superradiant phase is a finite size effect in two-photon processes,” (2026), arXiv:2601.19986 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  64. [65]

    Two-photon Rabi model: analytic solutions and spectral collapse,

    Liwei Duan, You-Fei Xie, Daniel Braak, and Qing-Hu Chen, “Two-photon Rabi model: analytic solutions and spectral collapse,” J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.49, 464002 (2016)

    work page 2016

  65. [66]

    Spectral collapse in the two- photon quantum Rabi model,

    R. J. Armenta Rico, F. H. Maldonado-Villamizar, and B. M. Rodriguez-Lara, “Spectral collapse in the two- photon quantum Rabi model,” Phys. Rev. A101, 063825 (2020)

    work page 2020

  66. [67]

    Spectral collapse in multiqubit two-photon Rabi model,

    C. F. Lo, “Spectral collapse in multiqubit two-photon Rabi model,” Sci. Rep.11, 5409 (2021)

    work page 2021

  67. [68]

    Enhanced photon squeezing in two- photon Dicke model,

    Priyankar Banerjee, Deepti Sharma, and Aranya B. Bhattacherjee, “Enhanced photon squeezing in two- photon Dicke model,” Phys. Lett. A446, 128287 (2022)

    work page 2022

  68. [69]

    Dark-like states for the multi-qubit and multi-photon Rabi models,

    Jie Peng, Chenxiong Zheng, Guangjie Guo, Xiaoy- ong Guo, Xin Zhang, Chaosheng Deng, Guoxing Ju, Zhongzhou Ren, Lucas Lamata, and Enrique Solano, “Dark-like states for the multi-qubit and multi-photon Rabi models,” J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.50, 174003 (2017)

    work page 2017

  69. [70]

    Nonlin- ear dynamics of the dissipative anisotropic two-photon Dicke model,

    Jiahui Li, Rosario Fazio, and Stefano Chesi, “Nonlin- ear dynamics of the dissipative anisotropic two-photon Dicke model,” New J. Phys.24, 083039 (2022)

    work page 2022

  70. [71]

    Routes to chaos in the bal- anced two-photon Dicke model with qubit dissipation,

    Jiahui Li and Stefano Chesi, “Routes to chaos in the bal- anced two-photon Dicke model with qubit dissipation,” Phys. Rev. A109, 053702 (2024)

    work page 2024

  71. [72]

    Dissipation-induced bistability in the two-photon Dicke model,

    Louis Garbe, Peregrine Wade, Fabrizio Minganti, Nathan Shammah, Simone Felicetti, and Franco Nori, “Dissipation-induced bistability in the two-photon Dicke model,” Sci. Rep.10, 13408 (2020)

    work page 2020

  72. [73]

    Dissipative phase transition in the two-photon Dicke model,

    Aanal Jayesh Shah, Peter Kirton, Simone Felicetti, and Hadiseh Alaeian, “Dissipative phase transition in the two-photon Dicke model,” Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 173602 (2025)

    work page 2025

  73. [74]

    Two-photon adiabatic inversion,

    M. M. T. Loy, “Two-photon adiabatic inversion,” Phys. Rev. Lett.41, 473–476 (1978)

    work page 1978

  74. [75]

    Two- photon amplification on cascade-transitions,

    H. Schlemmer, D. Fr¨ olich, and H. Welling, “Two- photon amplification on cascade-transitions,” Opt. Commun.32, 141–144 (1980)

    work page 1980

  75. [76]

    Two- photon laser,

    B. Nikolaus, D. Z. Zhang, and P. E. Toschek, “Two- photon laser,” Phys. Rev. Lett.47, 171–173 (1981)

    work page 1981

  76. [77]

    Realization of a continuous-wave, two-photon optical laser,

    Daniel J. Gauthier, Qilin Wu, S. E. Morin, and T. W. Mossberg, “Realization of a continuous-wave, two-photon optical laser,” Phys. Rev. Lett.68, 464–467 (1992)

    work page 1992

  77. [78]

    Theory of the Rydberg-atom two-photon micromaser,

    M. Brune, J. M. Raimond, and S. Haroche, “Theory of the Rydberg-atom two-photon micromaser,” Phys. Rev. A35, 154–163 (1987)

    work page 1987

  78. [79]

    Realization of a two-photon maser oscilla- tor,

    M. Brune, J. M. Raimond, P. Goy, L. Davidovich, and S. Haroche, “Realization of a two-photon maser oscilla- tor,” Phys. Rev. Lett.59, 1899–1902 (1987)

    work page 1902

  79. [80]

    The two-photon Rydberg atom micro- maser,

    M. Brune, J.M. Raimond, P. Goy, L. Davidovich, and S. Haroche, “The two-photon Rydberg atom micro- maser,” IEEE J. Quantum Electronics24, 1323–1330 (1988)

    work page 1988

  80. [81]

    Generating and probing a two-photon Fock state with a single atom in a cavity,

    P. Bertet, S. Osnaghi, P. Milman, A. Auffeves, P. Maioli, M. Brune, J. M. Raimond, and S. Haroche, “Generating and probing a two-photon Fock state with a single atom in a cavity,” Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 143601 (2002)

    work page 2002

Showing first 80 references.