pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.05216 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-06 · ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas · cond-mat.supr-con· quant-ph

Approximate vortex lattices of atomic Fermi superfluid on a spherical surface

Keshab Sony , Yan He , Chih-Chun Chien This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 18:43 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas cond-mat.supr-conquant-ph
keywords Fermi superfluidvortex latticespherical geometryAbrikosov parametermonopole fieldGinzburg-Landau theoryultracold atomsapproximate lattices
0
0 comments X

The pith

Approximate vortex lattices on a sphere have Abrikosov parameters approaching the planar value as vortex number increases.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Planar Fermi superfluids form regular Abrikosov vortex lattices under magnetic fields, but spherical surfaces prevent perfect lattices for more than 20 vortices. The paper constructs approximate vortex arrangements for atomic Fermi superfluids on a sphere under an effective monopole field using the Ginzburg-Landau approach. One method places the order parameter on scaffolds like the Fibonacci lattice using degenerate monopole harmonics, while the other numerically minimizes the free energy to find the lowest Abrikosov parameter. Both approaches show that the Abrikosov parameters approach the known value for flat geometry when the number of vortices becomes large. This provides insight into realizing vortex lattices in curved geometries relevant to ultracold atom experiments.

Core claim

Using two constructions based on the Ginzburg-Landau theory, the approximate vortex structures of atomic Fermi superfluids under an effective monopole field on a spherical surface are characterized as an analogue of the planar vortex-lattice problem. The geometric construction uses random, geodesic-dome, and Fibonacci lattices as scaffolds to build the order parameter from degenerate monopole harmonics, while the numerical construction adjusts coefficients to minimize the free energy and find the solution with the minimal Abrikosov parameter. The vortices in both cases are zeros of the order parameter with circulating currents around the cores. As the number of vortices increases, the Abrik

What carries the argument

The Abrikosov parameter, which quantifies the excess free energy due to vortices, computed for order parameters constructed from linear combinations of monopole harmonics on spherical lattice scaffolds or via free-energy minimization.

If this is right

  • The spherical vortex configurations become increasingly similar to planar Abrikosov lattices at high vortex densities.
  • Both geometric and variational methods yield consistent results that converge to the same planar limit.
  • These models can guide experiments with ultracold atoms in spherical shell traps to observe vortex formation.
  • The circulating currents around vortex cores are preserved in the approximate structures.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One could test the approach by comparing the predicted vortex positions in the Fibonacci construction with actual observations in spherical superfluids for moderate vortex numbers.
  • The convergence implies that for sufficiently dense vortices, curvature-induced deviations become small, potentially allowing use of planar theory approximations in mildly curved systems.
  • Similar scaffold-based constructions might extend to other topologically constrained geometries, such as tori or higher-genus surfaces.

Load-bearing premise

The Ginzburg-Landau framework remains quantitatively accurate for the Fermi superfluid on the sphere under the effective monopole field, especially when constructing the order parameter from degenerate monopole harmonics.

What would settle it

Computing or measuring the Abrikosov parameter for configurations with several hundred vortices on the sphere and verifying whether it matches the extrapolated planar value to within a few percent.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.05216 by Chih-Chun Chien, Keshab Sony, Yan He.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Current circulation (indicated by the arrows) around [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Left column: Illustrations of the (a) geodesic-dome, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Abrikosov parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Comparison of geometrically constructions [(a) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

While planar Fermi superfluids form Abrikosov vortex lattices under magnetic or effective gauge fields, spherical geometry forbids perfect lattices above 20 vortices. We characterize approximate vortex structures of atomic Fermi superfluids under an effective monopole field on a spherical surface as an analogue of the planar vortex-lattice problem by two constructions based on the Ginzburg-Landau theory. The first one is geometric and uses the random, geodesic-dome, and Fibonacci lattices as scaffolds to construct the order parameter from the degenerate monopole harmonics. The second one minimizes the free energy by numerically adjusting the coefficients to find the solution with the minimal Abrikosov parameter. We have verified the vortices from both constructions are zeros of the order parameter with circulating currents around the vortex cores. As the number of vortices increases, the Abrikosov parameters of both the Fibonacci-lattice and minimization solutions extrapolate to the planar value. We briefly discuss implications for ultracold atoms in thin spherical-shell geometry.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper claims that approximate vortex lattices of atomic Fermi superfluids on a spherical surface under an effective monopole field can be constructed within Ginzburg-Landau theory using two approaches: a geometric construction that expands the order parameter in degenerate monopole harmonics based on scaffolds such as random, geodesic-dome, and Fibonacci lattices, and a numerical minimization of the free energy by adjusting expansion coefficients to minimize the Abrikosov parameter. Both constructions are verified to produce vortices as zeros of the order parameter with circulating supercurrents, and the Abrikosov parameters from the Fibonacci and minimization solutions are shown to extrapolate toward the known planar triangular-lattice value as the vortex number N increases.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work is significant because it supplies explicit constructions and a numerical check that spherical vortex structures recover the planar Abrikosov lattice in the large-N continuum limit on a curved manifold. The dual geometric-plus-variational methodology and the explicit verification of phase winding and currents provide a concrete bridge between monopole-harmonic expansions and known flat-space results, with direct relevance to proposed ultracold-atom experiments in thin spherical shells.

major comments (1)
  1. The central extrapolation result (that Abrikosov parameters approach the planar value with increasing N) is presented without reported error bars, basis-size convergence tests, or quantitative fit details for the numerical minimization procedure. This absence directly affects in the load-bearing claim that the spherical solutions recover the planar limit.
minor comments (3)
  1. The Abrikosov parameter should be defined explicitly (including its relation to the free-energy functional) at first use rather than assumed known from the planar literature.
  2. The manuscript would benefit from a brief statement of the range of N examined and the number of monopole harmonics retained in the expansion for each construction.
  3. Figure captions or the main text should specify how the circulating currents around vortex cores are computed (e.g., via the supercurrent expression derived from the order-parameter phase).

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation of our work and the recommendation for minor revision. The single major comment is addressed below; we will incorporate the requested details to strengthen the presentation of the extrapolation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central extrapolation result (that Abrikosov parameters approach the planar value with increasing N) is presented without reported error bars, basis-size convergence tests, or quantitative fit details for the numerical minimization procedure. This absence directly affects in the load-bearing claim that the spherical solutions recover the planar limit.

    Authors: We agree that the numerical details of the minimization and extrapolation can be presented more rigorously. In the revised manuscript we will add: (i) error bars on the Abrikosov parameter obtained from the spread over multiple independent minimizations started from different random initial coefficient sets; (ii) a basis-size convergence test showing that the minimized value stabilizes once the monopole-harmonic cutoff exceeds the vortex number N by a fixed margin; and (iii) the explicit linear fit (Abrikosov parameter versus 1/N) together with the fitted intercept, slope, and their uncertainties. These additions will appear in the main text and in an updated figure, confirming that the approach to the planar limit remains robust under the reported numerical controls. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper's central derivation uses the Ginzburg-Landau functional on the sphere with monopole flux to construct order parameters via two independent routes: (1) geometric scaffolds (Fibonacci, geodesic) expanded in degenerate monopole harmonics, and (2) numerical coefficient adjustment to minimize the free-energy functional. The Abrikosov parameter is evaluated on the resulting solutions and shown numerically to approach the known planar triangular-lattice value for large vortex number N. This limit is an emergent numerical observation from the model equations, not a redefinition of the input parameters or a fitted quantity renamed as a prediction. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a self-citation, ansatz smuggled via prior work, or uniqueness theorem supplied by the authors themselves; the framework is standard GL theory applied to a new geometry, and the large-N check is externally falsifiable against the planar benchmark.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central constructions rest on the standard Ginzburg-Landau free-energy functional and the known properties of monopole harmonics; the only adjustable elements are the numerical coefficients tuned during minimization. No new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • coefficients of the order-parameter expansion
    Numerically varied to minimize the free energy (Abrikosov parameter) for each vortex number.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Ginzburg-Landau theory applies to the atomic Fermi superfluid on the sphere under an effective monopole field
    Invoked to construct the order parameter from degenerate monopole harmonics and to define the free-energy functional.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5474 in / 1345 out tokens · 28636 ms · 2026-05-10T18:43:27.819474+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith.Constants phi_golden_ratio echoes
    ?
    echoes

    ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

    ϕ_n = 2π n φ^{-1} (mod 2π), where φ = (1 + √5)/2 is the golden ratio

  • IndisputableMonolith.Cost.FunctionalEquation washburn_uniqueness_aczel echoes
    ?
    echoes

    ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

    β_A = ⟨|ψ|^4⟩ / ⟨|ψ|^2⟩² ... solution with the minimal Abrikosov parameter

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    R. A. Carollo, D. C. Aveline, B. Rhyno, S. Vishveshwara, C. Lannert, J. D. Murphree, E. R. Elliott, J. R. Williams, R. J. Thompson, and N. Lundblad, Observation of ultra- 8 cold atomic bubbles in orbital microgravity, Nature606, 281 (2022)

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    Lundblad, D

    N. Lundblad, D. C. Aveline, A. Balaˇ z, E. Bentine, N. P. Bigelow, P. Boegel, M. A. Efremov, N. Gaaloul, M. Meis- ter, M. Olshanii, C. A. R. S´ a de Melo, A. Tononi, S. Vishveshwara, A. C. White, A. Wolf, and B. M. Gar- raway, Perspective on quantum bubbles in microgravity, Quantum Sci. Technol.8, 024003 (2023)

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    F¨ olling, A

    S. F¨ olling, A. Widera, T. M¨ uller, F. Gerbier, and I. Bloch, Formation of spatial shell structure in the superfluid to mott insulator transition, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 060403 (2006)

    work page 2006

  4. [4]

    F. Jia, Z. Huang, L. Qiu, R. Zhou, Y. Yan, and D. Wang, Expansion dynamics of a shell-shaped bose-einstein con- densate, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 243402 (2022)

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    Bereta, L

    S. Bereta, L. Madeira, V. Bagnato, and M. Caracan- has, Bose–einstein condensation in spherically symmetric traps, Am. J. Phys.87, 924 (2019)

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    Tononi and L

    A. Tononi and L. Salasnich, Low-dimensional quantum gases in curved geometries, Nat. Rev. Phys.5, 398 (2023)

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Tononi and L

    A. Tononi and L. Salasnich, Shell-shaped atomic gases, Phys. Rep.1072, 1 (2024)

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    A. M. Turner, V. Vitelli, and D. R. Nelson, Vortices on curved surfaces, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1301 (2010)

    work page 2010

  9. [9]

    S. J. Bereta, M. A. Caracanhas, and A. L. Fetter, Super- fluid vortex dynamics on a spherical film, Phys. Rev. A 103, 053306 (2021)

    work page 2021

  10. [10]

    A. C. White, Triangular vortex lattices and giant vortices in rotating bubble bose-einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A109, 013301 (2024)

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    X.-Y. Chen, L. Jiang, W.-K. Bai, T. Yang, and J.-H. Zheng, Synthetic half-integer magnetic monopole and single-vortex dynamics in spherical bose-einstein conden- sates, Phys. Rev. A111, 033322 (2025)

    work page 2025

  12. [12]

    Padavi´ c, K

    K. Padavi´ c, K. Sun, C. Lannert, and S. Vishveshwara, Vortex-antivortex physics in shell-shaped bose-einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A102, 043305 (2020)

    work page 2020

  13. [13]

    S. K. Adhikari, Dipolar bose-einstein condensate in a ring or in a shell, Phys. Rev. A85, 053631 (2012)

    work page 2012

  14. [14]

    Tononi, L

    A. Tononi, L. Salasnich, and A. Yakimenko, Quantum vortices in curved geometries, AVS Quantum Sci.6, 030502 (2024)

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    He and C.-C

    Y. He and C.-C. Chien, Vortex structure and spectrum of an atomic fermi superfluid in a spherical bubble trap, Phys. Rev. A108, 053303 (2023)

    work page 2023

  16. [16]

    Y. He, H. Guo, and C.-C. Chien, Bcs-bec crossover of atomic fermi superfluid in a spherical bubble trap, Phys. Rev. A105, 033324 (2022)

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    A. A. Abrikosov, On the magnetic properties of super- conductors of the second group, Sov. Phys. JETP5, 1174 (1957)

    work page 1957

  18. [18]

    Jones and N

    W. Jones and N. H. March,Theoretical Solid State Physics, Vol. 2: Non-Equilibrium and Disorder(Dover Publications, New York, 1985)

    work page 1985

  19. [19]

    W. H. Kleiner, L. M. Roth, and S. H. Autler, Bulk so- lution of ginzburg-landau equations for type ii super- conductors: Upper critical field region, Phys. Rev.133, A1226 (1964)

    work page 1964

  20. [20]

    P. R. Cromwell,Polyhedra(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997)

    work page 1997

  21. [21]

    E. L. Altschuler, T. J. Williams, E. R. Ratner, R. Tip- ton, R. Stong, F. Dowla, and F. Wooten, Possible global minimum lattice configurations for thomson’s problem of charges on a sphere, Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 2681 (1997)

    work page 1997

  22. [22]

    Bowick, A

    M. Bowick, A. Cacciuto, D. R. Nelson, and A. Travesset, Crystalline order on a sphere and the generalized thom- son problem, Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 185502 (2002)

    work page 2002

  23. [23]

    Bausch, M

    A. Bausch, M. Bowick, A. Cacciuto, A. D. Dinsmore, M. Hsu, D. Nelson, M. Nikolaides, and D. A. Weitz, Grain boundary scars and spherical crystallography, Sci- ence299, 1716 (2003)

    work page 2003

  24. [24]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Fractional quantization of the hall ef- fect: A hierarchy of incompressible quantum fluid states, Phys. Rev. Lett.51, 605 (1983)

    work page 1983

  25. [25]

    Kvorning, Quantum hall hierarchy in a spherical ge- ometry, Phys

    T. Kvorning, Quantum hall hierarchy in a spherical ge- ometry, Phys. Rev. B87, 195131 (2013)

    work page 2013

  26. [26]

    A. L. Fetter and J. D. Walecka,Quantum Theory of Many-Particle Systems(Dover Publications, Mineola, NY, 2003) unabridged republication of the 1971 edition

    work page 2003

  27. [27]

    G. F. Mazenko,Fluctuations, Order, and Defects(Wiley- VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 2003)

    work page 2003

  28. [28]

    P. A. M. Dirac, Quantised singularities in the electromagnetic field,, Proc. R. Soc. A133, 60 (1931), https://royalsocietypublishing.org/rspa/article- pdf/133/821/60/26949/rspa.1931.0130.pdf

    work page arXiv 1931

  29. [29]

    Pietil¨ a and M

    V. Pietil¨ a and M. M¨ ott¨ onen, Creation of dirac monopoles in spinor bose-einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 030401 (2009)

    work page 2009

  30. [30]

    X.-F. Zhou, C. Wu, G.-C. Guo, R. Wang, H. Pu, and Z.-W. Zhou, Synthetic landau levels and spinor vortex matter on a haldane spherical surface with a magnetic monopole, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 130402 (2018)

    work page 2018

  31. [31]

    M. W. Ray, E. Ruokokoski, S. Kandel, M. M¨ ott¨ onen, and D. S. Hall, Observation of dirac monopoles in a synthetic magnetic field, Nature505, 657–660 (2014)

    work page 2014

  32. [32]

    Ollikainen, K

    T. Ollikainen, K. Tiurev, A. Blinova, W. Lee, D. S. Hall, and M. M¨ ott¨ onen, Experimental realization of a dirac monopole through the decay of an isolated monopole, Phys. Rev. X7, 021023 (2017)

    work page 2017

  33. [33]

    J. Lima, A. Santos, M. Cunha, and F. Moraes, Effects of rotation on landau states of electrons on a spherical shell, Phys. Lett. A382(2018)

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    Du and L

    Q. Du and L. Ju, Approximations of a ginzburg-landau model for superconducting hollow spheres based on spherical centroidal voronoi tessellations, Math. Comp. 74, 1257 (2005)

    work page 2005

  35. [35]

    T. T. Wu and C. N. Yang, Dirac monopole without strings: Monopole harmonics, Nuclear Physics B107, 365 (1976)

    work page 1976

  36. [36]

    M. J. W. Dodgson, Investigation on the ground states of a model thin-film superconductor on a sphere, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.29, 2499 (1996), arXiv:cond-mat/9512124 [cond-mat]

    work page arXiv 1996

  37. [37]

    M. J. W. Dodgson and M. A. Moore, Vortices in a thin- film superconductor with a spherical geometry, Phys. Rev. B55, 3816 (1997)

    work page 1997

  38. [38]

    Goldman, G

    N. Goldman, G. Juzeli¯ unas, P. ¨Ohberg, and I. B. Spiel- man, Light-induced gauge fields for ultracold atoms, Rep. Prog. Phys.77(2013)

    work page 2013

  39. [39]

    Dalibard, F

    J. Dalibard, F. Gerbier, G. Juzeli¯ unas, and P. ¨Ohberg, Colloquium: Artificial gauge potentials for neutral atoms, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 1523 (2011)

    work page 2011

  40. [40]

    Y.-J. Lin, R. Compton, K. Jimenez, J. Porto, and I. Spielman, Synthetic magnetic fields for ultracold neu- tral atoms, Nature462, 628 (2009)

    work page 2009

  41. [41]

    Tinkham,Introduction to Superconductivity, 2nd ed

    M. Tinkham,Introduction to Superconductivity, 2nd ed. (McGraw–Hill, New York, 1996). 9

    work page 1996

  42. [42]

    Campi, A

    G. Campi, A. Alimenti, G. Logvenov, G. A. Smith, F. Balakirev, S.-E. Lee, L. Balicas, E. Silva, G. A. Um- marino, G. Midei, A. Perali, A. Valletta, and A. Bianconi, Upper critical magnetic field and multiband supercon- ductivity in artificial high-Tc superlattices of nano quan- tum wells, Phys. Rev. Mater.9, 074204 (2025)

    work page 2025

  43. [43]

    I. Tamm, Die verallgemeinerten kugelfunktionen und die wellenfunktionen eines elektrons im felde eines magnet- poles [the generalized spherical harmonics and the wave functions of an electron in the field of a magnetic pole], Z. Phys.71, 141 (1931)

    work page 1931

  44. [44]

    J. J. Sakurai and J. J. Napolitano,Modern quantum me- chanics, 2nd ed. (Pearson, London, UK, 2010)

    work page 2010

  45. [45]

    Tashiro, On methods for generating uniform random points on the surface of a sphere, Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics29, 295 (1977)

    Y. Tashiro, On methods for generating uniform random points on the surface of a sphere, Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics29, 295 (1977)

    work page 1977

  46. [46]

    M. J. Wenninger,Spherical Models(Dover Publications, Mineola, NY, 2012)

    work page 2012

  47. [47]

    Santos, R

    L. Santos, R. Marques, K. Bouatouch, C. Bouville, and M. Ribardi` ere, Spherical fibonacci point sets for illumination integrals, Computer Graphics Forum32, 10.1111/cgf.12190 (2013)

    work page doi:10.1111/cgf.12190 2013

  48. [48]

    Santos, R

    L. Santos, R. Marques, K. Bouatouch, C. Bouville, and M. Ribardi` ere, Spherical fibonacci point sets for illumi- nation integrals, Computer Graphics Forum32(2013)

    work page 2013

  49. [49]

    Song, Q.-C

    C.-H. Song, Q.-C. Gao, X.-Y. Hou, X. Wang, Z. Zhou, Y. He, H. Guo, and C.-C. Chien, Machine learning of the xymodel on a spherical fibonacci lattice, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 023005 (2022)

    work page 2022

  50. [50]

    Nocedal and S

    J. Nocedal and S. J. Wright,Numerical Optimization, 2nd ed. (Springer, New York, NY, 2006)

    work page 2006

  51. [51]

    Y.-x. Yuan, A review of trust region algorithms for optimization, inICIAM99: Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress on Industrial & Applied Mathematics Edinburgh(Oxford University Press, 2000) https://academic.oup.com/book/0/chapter/422191153/chapter- pdf/52438596/isbn-9780198505143-book-part-23.pdf

    work page arXiv 2000

  52. [52]

    G. Aad, B. Abbott, D. C. Abbott, O. Abdinov, A. Abed Abud, K. Abeling, D. K. Abhayasinghe, S. H. Abidi, O. S. AbouZeid, N. L. Abraham, H. Abramowicz, H. Abreu, Y. Abulaiti, B. S. Acharya, B. Achkar, S. Adachi, L. Adam, C. Adam Bourdarios, L. Adamczyk, L. Adamek, J. Adelman, M. Adersberger, A. Adiguzel, S. Adorni, T. Adye, A. A. Affolder, Y. Afik, C. Agapo...

    work page 2020

  53. [53]

    J. R. Abo-Shaeer, C. Raman, J. M. Vogels, and W. Ketterle, Observation of vortex lattices in bose-einstein condensates, Science292, 476 (2001), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1060182

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1060182 2001

  54. [54]

    M. W. Zwierlein, J. R. Abo-Shaeer, J. R. Abo-Shaeer, A. Schirotzek, C. H. Schunck, and W. Ketterle, Vortices and superfluidity in a strongly interacting fermi gas, Na- ture435, 1047 (2005)

    work page 2005

  55. [55]

    A. Wolf, P. Boegel, M. Meister, A. Balaˇ z, N. Gaaloul, and M. A. Efremov, Shell-shaped bose-einstein conden- sates based on dual-species mixtures, Phys. Rev. A106, 013309 (2022)

    work page 2022

  56. [56]

    C. J. Pethick and H. Smith,Bose–Einstein Condensation in Dilute Gases, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2008)

    work page 2008

  57. [57]

    Chien, Y

    C.-C. Chien, Y. He, Q. Chen, and K. Levin, Ground- state description of a single vortex in an atomic fermi gas: From bcs to bose–einstein condensation, Phys. Rev. A73, 041603 (2006)

    work page 2006

  58. [58]

    P´ erez-Garrido, M

    A. P´ erez-Garrido, M. J. W. Dodgson, and M. A. Moore, Influence of dislocations in thomson’s problem, Phys. Rev. B56, 3640 (1997)

    work page 1997