pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.05803 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-07 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

Interband optical conductivities in two-dimensional tilted Dirac bands revisited within the tight-binding model

Chao-Yang Tan , Jian-Tong Hou , Xin Chen , Ling-Zhi Bai , Jie Lu , Yong-Hong Zhao , Chang-Xu Yan , Hao-Ran Chang
show 1 more author
Hong Guo
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 19:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords tilted Dirac bandstight-binding modeloptical conductivityinterband transitionscritical frequenciesBrillouin zonePauli exclusion
0
0 comments X

The pith

A tight-binding model for tilted Dirac bands produces three critical frequencies in interband optical conductivity that are absent from the linearized k·p approximation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates interband longitudinal optical conductivities in two-dimensional tilted Dirac systems by replacing the usual linear dispersion approximation with a full tight-binding lattice model that includes band tilting and shifts of the Dirac point. It identifies three additional characteristic frequencies—the partner frequencies, a sharp-peak frequency, and a cutoff frequency—that arise from the discrete band structure and Brillouin-zone boundaries. These features remain stable when tilting or shifting parameters are varied. A sympathetic reader would care because real materials are lattices, not continua, so optical experiments might detect these extra frequencies and thereby test which description is more accurate for light-matter response.

Core claim

Within the tight-binding model of two-dimensional tilted Dirac bands, three new characteristic critical frequencies appear in the interband longitudinal optical conductivities: partner frequencies whose origins are clarified by Lagrange-multiplier analysis, plus a sharp-peak frequency and a cutoff frequency tied to interband transitions at high-symmetry points. The sharp-peak and cutoff frequencies are enforced by the Pauli exclusion principle and the finite extent of the Brillouin zone; none of the three appear in the corresponding linearized k·p model, while the sharp-peak and cutoff frequencies stay robust against changes in tilting and Dirac-point position.

What carries the argument

The tight-binding Hamiltonian on the full Brillouin zone that incorporates band tilting and Dirac-point shifting, with interband transitions evaluated at high-symmetry points.

If this is right

  • The sharp-peak frequency and cutoff frequency remain robust against variations in band tilting and Dirac-point shifting.
  • Analytical expressions derived via the Lagrange multiplier method explain the conventional critical frequencies and their partner counterparts.
  • The sharp-peak and cutoff frequencies arise from interband optical transitions at high-symmetry points enforced by the Pauli exclusion principle and the finite boundaries of the Brillouin zone.
  • The predictions supply concrete signatures that can guide experimental searches for tilt-dependent optical features in 2D Dirac systems.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Detection of the sharp-peak frequency would favor lattice-based modeling over continuum approximations when interpreting optical data in real tilted Dirac materials.
  • The same high-symmetry-point mechanism could produce analogous robust features in optical conductivity of other lattice Dirac systems whose linearizations are commonly used.
  • Temperature or doping sweeps could be used to test whether the cutoff frequency tracks the Brillouin-zone boundary as expected.
  • If the partner frequencies are also observed, they would provide a direct experimental handle on the analytic structure of the conductivity integral beyond the linear regime.

Load-bearing premise

That interband transitions within the single-particle tight-binding bands fully determine the measured conductivity without scattering or many-body effects altering the response at those frequencies.

What would settle it

Optical conductivity spectra measured on a specific 2D tilted Dirac material (for example, appropriately strained graphene or a designer lattice) that either show or lack a sharp peak at the frequency predicted by the tight-binding calculation but forbidden in the k·p limit.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.05803 by Chang-Xu Yan, Chao-Yang Tan, Hao-Ran Chang, Hong Guo, Jian-Tong Hou, Jie Lu, Ling-Zhi Bai, Xin Chen, Yong-Hong Zhao.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic diagrams of energy band for (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Results and analysis for untilted Dirac bands ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Results and analysis for under-tilted Dirac bands (0 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Density plot of the interband optical transition de [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Comparison of interband LOCs between the linearized [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Within the framework of linear response theory, we theoretically investigated the interband longitudinal optical conductivities (LOCs) in two-dimensional (2D) tilted Dirac bands using a tight-binding (TB) model, incorporating the effects of band tilting and Dirac-point shifting. We identified three characteristic critical frequencies in the interband LOCs of the TB model: the partner frequencies, the sharp- peak frequency, and the cutoff frequency. In contrast to conventional critical frequencies, these three types are consistently absent in the corresponding linearized $k\cdot p$ model. Notably, the sharp-peak frequency and cutoff frequency remain robust against variations in band tilting and Dirac-point shifting. By employing analytical expressions derived via the Lagrange multiplier method, we elucidate the origins of the conventional critical frequencies and their partner counterparts. In contrast, the sharp-peak frequency and cutoff frequency are associated with interband optical transitions at high-symmetry points of the energy bands, arising from the Pauli exclusion principle and the finite boundaries of the Brillouin zone. Our theoretical predictions are intended to guide future experimental studies on tilt-dependent optical phenomena in 2D tilted Dirac systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper theoretically investigates the interband longitudinal optical conductivities in two-dimensional tilted Dirac bands using a tight-binding model within linear response theory. It identifies three characteristic critical frequencies in the TB model—the partner frequencies, the sharp-peak frequency, and the cutoff frequency—that are absent in the linearized k·p model. The partner frequencies are derived analytically using the Lagrange multiplier method, while the sharp-peak and cutoff frequencies are associated with interband transitions at high-symmetry points, Pauli exclusion principle, and finite Brillouin zone boundaries. These latter two are robust against variations in band tilting and Dirac-point shifting.

Significance. If the results hold, the work demonstrates the necessity of going beyond linearized approximations to capture certain optical features in tilted Dirac systems, providing concrete predictions to guide experiments on tilt-dependent optical phenomena. The analytical derivations via the Lagrange multiplier method and the robustness analysis against tilting and shifting are strengths.

minor comments (3)
  1. The abstract would benefit from briefly specifying the tight-binding Hamiltonian or key parameters (e.g., hopping amplitudes or tilting strength) to better contextualize the derived frequencies.
  2. In the section deriving the critical frequencies, the application of the Lagrange multiplier method to locate partner frequencies should include the explicit constraint equations and resulting analytical expressions for verification.
  3. The discussion of experimental implications could be strengthened by estimating the frequency scales (in eV or THz) for typical materials and suggesting how the sharp-peak and cutoff features might be distinguished from conventional ones in measurements.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive and accurate summary of our work on interband longitudinal optical conductivities in two-dimensional tilted Dirac bands using the tight-binding model. The referee correctly highlights the three characteristic critical frequencies (partner, sharp-peak, and cutoff) absent from the linearized k·p model, as well as the analytical derivations and robustness analysis. We appreciate the recommendation for minor revision.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The derivation proceeds from the tight-binding Hamiltonian for tilted Dirac bands, applies linear response theory to obtain interband LOC expressions, and locates critical frequencies analytically via the Lagrange multiplier method on the TB dispersion; the partner, sharp-peak, and cutoff frequencies are shown to arise from explicit features (high-symmetry points, Pauli blocking, finite BZ) absent by construction from the low-energy k·p expansion. No parameter is fitted to data and then relabeled as a prediction, no result is defined in terms of itself, and no load-bearing step reduces to a self-citation or ansatz smuggled from prior work by the same authors. The contrast with k·p is therefore a direct model comparison rather than a circular claim.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard linear response theory and the validity of the tight-binding Hamiltonian for tilted Dirac bands; no free parameters or invented entities are mentioned in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Linear response theory applies to calculate interband optical conductivities
    Stated as the framework used for the theoretical investigation.
  • domain assumption The tight-binding model accurately incorporates band tilting and Dirac-point shifting beyond linear approximation
    Implicit in the contrast drawn with the linearized k·p model.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5526 in / 1249 out tokens · 46054 ms · 2026-05-10T19:19:25.115659+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 87 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Further, the part- ner frequency ω′ 1 is equal to the conventional critical fre- quency ω1 with ω′ 1 = ω1. It is because the two Fermi surfaces are of the same Fermi wave vector along arbi- trary direction that the characteristic critical frequencies ω′ 1 = ω′ 2 = ω1 = ω2 = 2µ, and the interband LOCs σIB xx(ω, µ > 0, t = 0 , h = 0) = σIB yy(ω, µ > 0, t = ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    This result indicates that a finite energy shift (h > 0) introduces a new characteristic frequency ω′ j and leads to notable anisotropic behavior in the interband LOCs around this frequency. For the doped case (µ > 0) with shifting of Dirac points (h > 0), the physics of interband LOCs becomes richer, since the Fermi wave vectors differ not only between t...

    work page

  3. [3]

    As a conse- quence, the interband LOC σIB xx(ω, µ ≥ 0, t = 0 , h = 0) is equal to σIB yy(ω, µ ≥ 0, t = 0 , h = 0) only when ω is either greater than ω′ 2 or less than ω− 1

    Besides, the part- ner frequency ω′ j is also greater than the maximum of ω− j and ω+ j , namely, ω′ j > Max{ω− j , ω+ j }. As a conse- quence, the interband LOC σIB xx(ω, µ ≥ 0, t = 0 , h = 0) is equal to σIB yy(ω, µ ≥ 0, t = 0 , h = 0) only when ω is either greater than ω′ 2 or less than ω− 1 . Explicitly, for√ h2 + t2ε0 + (−1)jµ ≥ 0, the conventional c...

    work page 2015

  4. [4]

    Novoselov, A.K

    K.S. Novoselov, A.K. Geim, S.V. Morozov, D. Jiang, Y. Zhang, S.V. Dubonos, I.V. Grigorieva, and A.A. Firsov, Electric Field Effect in Atomically Thin Carbon Films, Science 306, 666 (2004)

    work page 2004

  5. [5]

    Castro Neto, F

    A.H. Castro Neto, F. Guinea, N.M.R. Peres, K.S. Novoselov, and A.K. Geim, The electronic properties of graphene, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 109 (2009)

    work page 2009

  6. [6]

    Katayama, A

    S. Katayama, A. Kobayashi, and Y. Suzumura, Pressure- Induced Zero-Gap Semiconducting State in Organic Con- ductor α-(BEDT-TTF)2I3 Salt, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 75, 054705 (2006)

    work page 2006

  7. [7]

    Choi, S.H

    S.M. Choi, S.H. Jhi, and Y.W. Son, Effects of strain on electronic properties of graphene, Phys. Rev. B 81, 081407(R) (2010)

    work page 2010

  8. [8]

    X.F. Zhou, X. Dong, A.R. Oganov, Q. Zhu, Y.J. Tian, and H.T. Wang, Semimetallic 2D Boron Allotrope with Massless Dirac Fermions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 085502 (2014)

    work page 2014

  9. [9]

    Mannix, X.-F

    Andrew J. Mannix, X.-F. Zhou, B. Kiraly, Joshua D. Wood, D. Alducin, Benjamin D. Myers, X. Liu, Bran- don L. Fisher, U. Santiago, Jeffrey R. Guest, Miguel J. Yacaman, A. Ponce, Artem R. Oganov , Mark C. Her- sam, and Nathan P. Guisinger, Synthesis of borophenes: Anisotropic, two-dimensional boron polymorphs, Sci- ence, 350, 1513 (2015)

    work page 2015

  10. [10]

    Lopez-Bezanilla and P.B

    A. Lopez-Bezanilla and P.B. Littlewood, Electronic properties of 8- P mmn borophene, Phys. Rev. B 93, 241405(R) (2016)

    work page 2016

  11. [11]

    Zabolotskiy and Yu

    A.D. Zabolotskiy and Yu. E. Lozovik, Strain-induced pseudomagnetic field in the Dirac semimetal borophene, Phys. Rev. B 94, 165403 (2016)

    work page 2016

  12. [12]

    K.F. Mak, C. Lee, J. Hone, J. Shan, and T.F. Heinz, Atomically Thin MoS2: A New Direct-Gap Semiconduc- tor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 136805 (2010)

    work page 2010

  13. [13]

    Xiao, G.B

    D. Xiao, G.B. Liu, W. Feng, X. Xu, and W. Yao, Cou- pled Spin and Valley Physics in Monolayers of MoS2 and Other Group-VI Dichalcogenides Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 196802 (2012)

    work page 2012

  14. [14]

    X. Qian, J. Liu, L. Fu, and J. Li, Quantum spin Hall ef- fect in two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides, Science 346, 1344 (2014)

    work page 2014

  15. [15]

    Lu, A.S.Cuamba, S.Y

    H.Y. Lu, A.S.Cuamba, S.Y. Lin, L. Hao, R. Wang, H. Li, Y.Y. Zhao, and C.S. Ting, Tilted anisotropic Dirac cones in partially hydrogenated graphene, Phys. Rev. B 94, 195423 (2016)

    work page 2016

  16. [16]

    Y. Ma, L. Kou, X. Li, Y. Dai, and T. Heine, Room tem- perature quantum spin Hall states in two-dimensional crystals composed of pentagonal rings and their quan- tum wells, NPG Asia Mater. 8, 264 (2016)

    work page 2016

  17. [17]

    Sheng, C

    X.-L. Sheng, C. Chen, H. Liu, Z. Chen, Z.-M. Yu, Y.X. Zhao, and S.A. Yang, Two-Dimensional Second-Order Topological Insulator in Graphdiyne, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 256402 (2019)

    work page 2019

  18. [18]

    S. Li, Y. Liu, Z.-M. Yu, Y. Jiao, S. Guan, X.-L. Sheng, Y. Yao, and S.A. Yang, Two-dimensional antiferromagnetic Dirac fermions in monolayer TaCoTe2, Phys. Rev. B 100, 205102 (2019)

    work page 2019

  19. [19]

    Guo, X.-Q

    P.-J. Guo, X.-Q. Lu , W. Ji , K. Liu , and Z.-Y. Lu, Quan- tum spin Hall effect in monolayer and bilayer TaIrTe 4, Phys. Rev. B 102, 041109(R) (2020)

    work page 2020

  20. [20]

    Iurov, G

    A. Iurov, G. Gumbs, D. Huang, and G. Balakrish- nan, Thermal plasmons controlled by different thermal- convolution paths in tunable extrinsic Dirac structures, Phys. Rev. B 96, 245403 (2017)

    work page 2017

  21. [21]

    Sadhukhan and A

    K. Sadhukhan and A. Agarwal, Anisotropic plas- mons, Friedel oscillations, and screening in 8- P mmn borophene, Phys. Rev. B 96, 035410 (2017)

    work page 2017

  22. [22]

    Jalali-Mola and S.A

    Z. Jalali-Mola and S.A. Jafari, Tilt-induced kink in the plasmon dispersion of two-dimensional Dirac electrons, Phys. Rev. B 98, 195415 (2018)

    work page 2018

  23. [23]

    K. Liu, J. Li, Q.-X. Li, and J.-J. Zhu, Anisotropic plasmon dispersion and damping in multilayer 8- P mmn borophene structures, Chin. Phys. B 31, 117303 (2022)

    work page 2022

  24. [24]

    Mojarro, R

    M.A. Mojarro, R. Carrillo-Bastos, and Jes´ us A. May- torena, Hyperbolic plasmons in massive tilted two- dimensional Dirac materials, Phys. Rev. B 105, L201408 (2022)

    work page 2022

  25. [25]

    Nishine, A

    T. Nishine, A. Kobayashi, and Y. Suzumura, New Plas- mon and Filtering Effect in a Pair of Tilted-Dirac Cone, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 80,114713 (2011)

    work page 2011

  26. [26]

    Nishine, A

    T. Nishine, A. Kobayashi, and Y. Suzumura, Plasmon and Optical conductivity of Massless Dirac Fermions, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 79, 114715 (2010)

    work page 2010

  27. [27]

    Verma, A

    S. Verma, A. Mawrie, T.K. Ghosh, Effect of electron- hole asymmetry on optical conductivity in 8- P mmn borophene, Phys. Rev. B 96, 155418 (2017)

    work page 2017

  28. [28]

    Iurov, G

    A. Iurov, G. Gumbs, and D. Huang, Temperature- and frequency-dependent optical and transport conductivities in doped buckled honeycomb lattices, Phys. Rev. B 98, 075414 (2018)

    work page 2018

  29. [29]

    Herrera and G.G

    S.A. Herrera and G.G. Naumis, Kubo conductivity for anisotropic tilted Dirac semimetals and its application to 8-P mmn borophene: Role of frequency, temperature, and scattering limits, Phys. Rev. B 100, 195420 (2019)

    work page 2019

  30. [30]

    Rostamzadeh, ˙Inan¸ c

    S. Rostamzadeh, ˙Inan¸ c. Adagideli, and M.O. Goerbig, Large enhancement of conductivity in Weyl semimetals with tilted cones: Pseudorelativity and linear response, Phys. Rev. B 100, 075438 (2019). 12

    work page 2019

  31. [31]

    Tan, C.-X

    C.-Y. Tan, C.-X. Yan, Y.-H. Zhao, H. Guo, and H.-R. Chang, Anisotropic longitudinal optical conductivities of tilted Dirac bands in 1 T ′-MoS2, Phys. Rev. B 103, 125425 (2021)

    work page 2021

  32. [32]

    Tan, J.-T

    C.-Y. Tan, J.-T. Hou, C.-X. Yan, H. Guo, and H.-R. Chang, Signatures of Lifshitz transition in the optical conductivity of two-dimensional tilted Dirac materials, Phys. Rev. B 106, 165404 (2022)

    work page 2022

  33. [33]

    Hou, C.-X

    J.-T. Hou, C.-X. Yan, C.-Y. Tan, Z.-Q. Li, P. Wang, H. Guo, and H.-R. Chang, Effects of spatial dimensionality and band tilting on the longitudinal optical conductivi- ties in Dirac bands, Phys. Rev. B 108, 035407 (2023)

    work page 2023

  34. [34]

    Mojarro, R.Carrillo-Bastos, and Jes´ us A

    M.A. Mojarro, R.Carrillo-Bastos, and Jes´ us A. May- torena, Optical properties of massive anisotropic tilted Dirac systems, Phys. Rev. B 103, 165415 (2021)

    work page 2021

  35. [35]

    A. Wild, E. Mariani, and M. E. Portnoi, Optical absorp- tion in two-dimensional materials with tilted Dirac cones, Phys. Rev. B 105, 205306 (2022)

    work page 2022

  36. [36]

    H. Yao, M. Zhu, L. Jiang, and Y. Zheng, Effect of the Dirac-cone tilt on the disorder-broadened Landau levels in a two-dimensional Dirac nodal system, Phys. Rev. B 104, 235406 (2021)

    work page 2021

  37. [37]

    Jayannavar, Signature of tilted Dirac cones in Weiss oscillations of 8- P mmn borophene, Phys

    SK Firoz Islam and A.M. Jayannavar, Signature of tilted Dirac cones in Weiss oscillations of 8- P mmn borophene, Phys. Rev. B 96, 235405 (2017)

    work page 2017

  38. [38]

    Zhang and W

    S.-H. Zhang and W. Yang, Oblique Klein tunneling in 8- Pmmn borophene p-n junctions, Phys. Rev. B97, 235440 (2018)

    work page 2018

  39. [39]

    Z. Kong, J. Li, Y. Zhang, S.-H. Zhang, and J.-J. Zhu, Oblique and asymmetric Klein tunneling across smooth NP junctions or NPN junctions in 8- P mmn borophene, Nanomaterials 11, 1462 (2021)

    work page 2021

  40. [40]

    Nguyen and J

    V.H. Nguyen and J. C. Charlier, Klein tunneling and electron optics in Dirac-Weyl fermion systems with tilted energy dispersion, Phys. Rev. B 97, 235113 (2018)

    work page 2018

  41. [41]

    Sun, L.-J

    J.-H. Sun, L.-J. Wang, X.-T. Hu, L. Li, and D.-H. Xu, Single Magnetic impurity in tiled Dirac surface states, Phys. Rev. B, 97, 035130 (2018)

    work page 2018

  42. [42]

    Paul, SK Firoz Islam, and A

    G.C. Paul, SK Firoz Islam, and A. Saha, Fingerprints of tilted Dirac cones on the RKKY exchange interaction in 8-P mmn borophene, Phys. Rev. B 99, 155418 (2019)

    work page 2019

  43. [43]

    Zhang, D.-F

    S.-H. Zhang, D.-F. Shao, and W. Yang, Velocity- determined anisotropic behaviors of RKKY interaction in 8-P mmn borophene, J. Mag. Mag. Mater. 491, 165631 (2019)

    work page 2019

  44. [44]

    Zheng, H.-J

    S.-H. Zheng, H.-J. Duan, J.-K. Wang, J.-Y. Li, M.-X. Deng, and R.-Q. Wang, Origin of planar Hall effect on the surface of topological insulators: Tilt of Dirac cone by an in-plane magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B 101, 041408(R) (2020)

    work page 2020

  45. [45]

    Rostami and V

    H. Rostami and V. Juricic, Probing quantum criticality using nonlinear Hall effect in a metallic Dirac system, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 013069 (2020)

    work page 2020

  46. [46]

    Zhang, D.-F

    S.-H. Zhang, D.-F. Shao, Z.-A. Wang, J. Yang, W. Yang, and E. Y. Tsymbal, Tunneling valley Hall effect driven by tilted Dirac fermions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 246301 (2023)

    work page 2023

  47. [48]

    Kapri, B

    P. Kapri, B. Dey, and T.K. Ghosh, Valley caloritronics in a photodriven heterojunction of Dirac materials, Phys. Rev. B 102, 045417 (2020)

    work page 2020

  48. [49]

    Sengupta and E

    P. Sengupta and E. Bellotti, Anomalous Lorenz number in massive and tilted Dirac systems, Appl. Phys. Lett. 117, 223103 (2020)

    work page 2020

  49. [50]

    Zheng, J

    J. Zheng, J. Lu, and F. Zhai, Anisotropic and gate- tunable valley filtering based on 8- P mmn borophene, Nanotechnology 32, 025205 (2021)

    work page 2021

  50. [51]

    Farajollahpour and S.A

    T. Farajollahpour and S.A. Jafari, Synthetic non-Abelian gauge fields and gravitomagnetic effects in tilted Dirac cone systems, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023410 (2020)

    work page 2020

  51. [52]

    Faraei and S.A

    Z. Faraei and S.A. Jafari, Electrically charged Andreev modes in two-dimensional tilted Dirac cone systems, Phys. Rev. B 101, 214508 (2020)

    work page 2020

  52. [53]

    Fu, S.-S

    W. Fu, S.-S. Ke, M.-X. Lu, and H.-F. Lv, Coulomb bound states and atomic collapse in tilted Dirac materials, Phys. E 134, 114841 (2021)

    work page 2021

  53. [54]

    R.A. Ng, A. Wild, M.E. Portnoi, and R.R. Hartmann, Optical valley separation in two-dimensional semimetals with tilted Dirac cones, Sci. Rep. 12, 7688 (2022)

    work page 2022

  54. [55]

    Diaz-Bautista, and Thomas Stegmann, Valley-dependent time evolution of coherent electron states in tilted anisotropic Dirac mate- rials, Phys

    Yonatan Betancur-Ocampo, E. Diaz-Bautista, and Thomas Stegmann, Valley-dependent time evolution of coherent electron states in tilted anisotropic Dirac mate- rials, Phys. Rev. B 105, 045401 (2022)

    work page 2022

  55. [56]

    Gusynin, S.G

    V.P. Gusynin, S.G. Sharapov, and J.P. Carbotte, Un- usual Microwave Response of Dirac Quasiparticles in Graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 256802 (2006)

    work page 2006

  56. [57]

    Gusynin, S.G

    V.P. Gusynin, S.G. Sharapov, and J.P. Carbotte, Sum rules for the optical and Hall conductivity in graphene, Phys. Rev. B 75, 165407 (2007)

    work page 2007

  57. [58]

    Mikhailov and K

    S.A. Mikhailov and K. Ziegler, New Electromagnetic Mode in Graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 016803 (2007)

    work page 2007

  58. [59]

    Kuzmenko, E

    A.B. Kuzmenko, E. van Heumen, F. Carbone, and D. van der Marel, Universal optical conductance of graphite, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 117401 (2008)

    work page 2008

  59. [60]

    Mak, M.Y

    K.F. Mak, M.Y. Sfeir, Y. Wu, C.H. Lui, J.A. Misewich, and T.F. Heinz, Measurement of the Optical Conductiv- ity of Graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 196405 (2008)

    work page 2008

  60. [61]

    Stauber, N.M.R

    T. Stauber, N.M.R. Peres, and A.K. Geim, Optical con- ductivity of graphene in the visible region of the spec- trum, Phys. Rev. B 78, 085432 (2008)

    work page 2008

  61. [62]

    Stille, C.J

    L. Stille, C.J. Tabert, and E.J. Nicol, Optical signatures of the tunable band gap and valley-spin coupling in sil- icene, Phys. Rev. B 86, 195405 (2012)

    work page 2012

  62. [63]

    Li and J.P

    Z. Li and J.P. Carbotte, Longitudinal and spin-valley Hall optical conductivity in single layer MoS2, Phys. Rev. B 86, 205425 (2012)

    work page 2012

  63. [64]

    Li and J.P

    Z. Li and J.P. Carbotte, Hexagonal warping on opti- cal conductivity of surface states in topological insulator Bi2Te3, Phys. Rev. B 87, 155416 (2013)

    work page 2013

  64. [65]

    Xiao and W

    X. Xiao and W. Wen, Optical conductivities and signa- tures of topological insulators with hexagonal warping, Phys. Rev. B 88, 045442 (2013)

    work page 2013

  65. [66]

    Wu, Dynamical polarization and the optical re- sponse of silicene and related materials, Results in Physics 11, 665 (2018)

    C.-H. Wu, Dynamical polarization and the optical re- sponse of silicene and related materials, Results in Physics 11, 665 (2018)

    work page 2018

  66. [67]

    Wu, Dynamical current–current correlation in two- dimensional parabolic Dirac systems, Phys

    C.-H. Wu, Dynamical current–current correlation in two- dimensional parabolic Dirac systems, Phys. Lett. A 383, 550 (2019)

    work page 2019

  67. [68]

    Wu, Integer quantum Hall conductivity and lon- gitudinal conductivity in silicene under the electric field and magnetic field, Eur

    C.-H. Wu, Integer quantum Hall conductivity and lon- gitudinal conductivity in silicene under the electric field and magnetic field, Eur. Phys. J. B 92, 25 (2019)

    work page 2019

  68. [69]

    The Dirac-like energy scale ε0 is typically of the order 0.2 ∼ 2.0 eV. For instance, ε0 is ∼ 1.0 eV for graphene [1], and 1 .5 ∼ 2.0 eV for 8- Pmmn borophene [5–8], 0.2 ∼ 0.5 eV for 1T ′ transition metal dichalcogenides [11], 13 0.3 ∼ 0.5 eV for α-SnS2 [13], 0.6 eV for α-graphyne [14], 0.4 eV for TaCoTe 2 [15], and 0 .5 ∼ 1.0 eV for TaIrTe 4 [16]. We wish...

    work page

  69. [70]

    See Supplemental Materials at xxx for details

    work page

  70. [71]

    In early January 2015, shortly after the online publica- tion of Ref. [11], Hao-Ran Chang first found that the spin-valley-polarized bands and gaps of 1 T ′-MoS2 un- der a vertical electric field can be well described by in- troducing a key term proportional to the vertical elec- tric field—( τ1 ⊗ σ0) Ez Ec ℏv2Λ— to the low-energy k · p Hamiltonian presen...

    work page arXiv 2015

  71. [72]

    Fu, Hexagonal warping effects in the surface states of the topological insulator Bi2Te3, Phys

    L. Fu, Hexagonal warping effects in the surface states of the topological insulator Bi2Te3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 266801 (2009)

    work page 2009

  72. [73]

    Souma, K

    S. Souma, K. Kosaka, T. Sato, M. Komatsu, A. Takayama, T. Takahashi, M. Kriener, K. Segawa, and Y. Ando, Direct measurement of the out-of-plane spin texture in the Dirac-cone surface state of a topological insulator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 216803 (2011)

    work page 2011

  73. [74]

    Nomura, S

    M. Nomura, S. Souma, A. Takayama, T. Sato, T. Taka- hashi, K. Eto, K. Segawa, and Y. Ando, Relationship be- tween Fermi surface warping and out-of-plane spin polar- ization in topological insulators: A view from spin- and angle-resolved photoemission, Phys. Rev. B 89, 045134 (2014)

    work page 2014

  74. [75]

    Z. M. Yu, D. S. Ma, H. Pan, and Y. G. Yao, Double reflection and tunneling resonance in a topological insu- lator: Towards the quantification of warping strength by transport, Phys. Rev. B 96, 125152 (2017)

    work page 2017

  75. [76]

    Hou and Q

    Z. Hou and Q. F. Sun, Double Andreev reflections in type-II Weyl semimetal-superconductor junctions, Phys. Rev. B 96, 155305 (2017)

    work page 2017

  76. [77]

    Interband optical conductivities in two-dimensional tilted Dirac bands revisited within the tight-binding model

    C.-Y. Zhu, S.-H. Zheng, H.-J. Duan, M.-X. Deng, R.- Q. Wang, Double Andreev reflections at surface states of the topological insulators with hexagonal warping, Front. Phys. 15, 23602 (2020). Supplemental Materials to “Interband optical conductivities in two-dimensional tilted Dirac bands revisited within the tight-binding model” VI. EXPLICIT EXPRESSION OF...

    work page 2020

  77. [78]

    Then the condition in Eq.(67) gives rise to p X2 + Y 2ε0 = |Y |ε0 ≡ ω 2 ≥ 0, (71) λ ω 2 − µ = 0, (72) leading to ω = 2µ λ ≥ 0

    Analytical results for h = 0, t = 0 and 0 < µ < (1 − t)ε0 If h = 0, t = 0 and µ > 0, the conditions in Eq.(65) and (66) are simultaneously satisfied only when (2 + λζ) = 0. Then the condition in Eq.(67) gives rise to p X2 + Y 2ε0 = |Y |ε0 ≡ ω 2 ≥ 0, (71) λ ω 2 − µ = 0, (72) leading to ω = 2µ λ ≥ 0. (73) Since µ > 0, we get λ = +1, then ω ≡ 2µ. (74)

    work page

  78. [79]

    Therefore, we focus on the condition in Eq.(67), which is independent of ζ

    Analytical results for h = 0, 0 < t < 1 and 0 < µ < (1 − t)ε0 From the solution X = 0, the condition in Eq.(65) is automatically satisfied, and the condition in Eq.(66) can be satisfied if a suitable Lagrange multiplier ζ is chosen. Therefore, we focus on the condition in Eq.(67), which is independent of ζ. We have ω 2 = √ X2 + Y 2ε0 = |Y |ε0 = sgn( Y )Y ...

    work page

  79. [80]

    Therefore, we focus on the condition in Eq.(67), which is independent of ζ

    Analytical results for h > 0 The condition in Eq.(65) is automatically satisfied, and the condition in Eq.(66) can be satisfied if a suitable Lagrange multiplier ζ is chosen. Therefore, we focus on the condition in Eq.(67), which is independent of ζ. We have√ X2 + Y 2 = |Y | = sgn(Y )Y for X = 0. It is straightforward that the condition in Eq.(67) reduces...

    work page

  80. [81]

    (102) 18 For κλ = +1, we have Y+ = + hq (1 + t)2 + h2 , (1 + t) hq (1 + t)2 + h2 ≥ 0; (103) Y− = − hq (1 − t)2 + h2 , − (1 − t) hq (1 − t)2 + h2 < 0 (≱ 0)

    Analytical results for h > 0, 0 ≤ t < 1 and µ = 0 For h > 0, 0 ≤ t < 1 and µ = 0, we have Y+ = + hq (1 + κλt)2 + h2 , +κλ (1 + κλt) hq (1 + κλt)2 + h2 ≥ 0; (101) Y− = − hq (1 − κλt)2 + h2 , −κλ (1 − κλt) hq (1 − κλt)2 + h2 ≥ 0. (102) 18 For κλ = +1, we have Y+ = + hq (1 + t)2 + h2 , (1 + t) hq (1 + t)2 + h2 ≥ 0; (103) Y− = − hq (1 − t)2 + h2 , − (1 − t) h...

    work page

Showing first 80 references.