pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.05968 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-07 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · physics.comp-ph

Composition design of refractory compositionally complex alloys using machine learning models

Tao Liang , Eric A. Lass , Haochen Zhu , Carla Joyce C. Nocheseda , Philip D. Rack , Stephen Puplampu , Dayakar Penumadu , Haixuan Xu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 19:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.comp-ph
keywords refractory compositionally complex alloysmachine learningyield strengthphase stabilitycomposition designhigh-temperature materialsBCC alloys
0
0 comments X

The pith

A machine learning framework predicts phase stability and temperature-dependent yield strength for any refractory compositionally complex alloy composition.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper builds an integrated design framework to handle the enormous composition space of refractory compositionally complex alloys, which cannot be exhaustively tested by experiment or first-principles calculation. Theory-guided machine learning models are trained to forecast both phase stability across competing crystal structures and mechanical response, with yield strength modeled as a function of temperature from room temperature to 2000 K. The resulting models reach an R-squared value of 0.98 and are packaged into an on-demand predictor plus screener that lets a designer input any composition, obtain all key properties, and apply custom filters to reduce the space worth synthesizing.

Core claim

The central claim is that an integrated framework of theory-guided machine learning models, forward sequential feature selection, and custom screening tools can map the relationships between nine-element refractory compositions and both phase stability and temperature-dependent yield strength, achieving an R-squared of 0.98 across 0–2000 K and enabling exhaustive on-demand evaluation of any chosen alloy.

What carries the argument

The theory-guided machine learning model for temperature-dependent yield strength, supplemented with phase stability predictions for BCC, HCP, Laves, and B2 structures.

Load-bearing premise

The theory-guided data supplementation at ultra-high temperatures correctly represents real yield strength behavior and the trained models generalize accurately to compositions never seen in the training set.

What would settle it

Synthesize and mechanically test a new nine-element refractory composition whose predicted yield strength at 1500 K or 2000 K differs substantially from the model output; agreement or disagreement directly tests the generalization claim.

read the original abstract

Refractory compositionally complex alloys (RCCAs) are considered the next generation high-temperature materials. However, their high-dimensional composition spaces are too large to explore by traditional density functional theory or experimental means, making new RCCA discovery slow and cumbersome. This work has addressed these challenges with an integrated composition design framework that can efficiently and exhaustively explore the relationship between the compositions and two fundamental aspects: 1) the phase stability, including the target body-centered cubic (BCC) phase and its competing phases (hexagonal closed-pack (HCP) structures, Laves and B2 intermetallic phases), and 2) the mechanical properties. This framework is demonstrated with RCCAs within nine refractory metals (Ti, V, Cr, Zr, Nb, Mo, Hf, Ta, and W). Theory-guided machine learning (ML) models were employed to find the composition-mechanical property relationship of RCCAs, where the established theory is used to supplement the yield strength data at ultra-high temperature, and a forward sequential feature selection (SFS) is used to determine feature selection. The resulting ML model for temperature-dependent yield strength was found to have an R_squared value of 0.98 over the entire temperature range (from 0 to 2000 K). The impact of each constituent element on the six key properties is evaluated. The addition of Nb tends to stabilize the BCC phase and the addition of Ti improves the ductility of RCCAs. Combined with all methods involved in this framework, the on-demand designer allows the alloy designers to have all properties for any RCCA compositions and narrow down the composition space by applying custom screening criteria. The output from the predictor and screener provides valuable guidance for our experimental study of RCCAs and accelerates the pace of materials discovery.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents an integrated ML framework for composition design of refractory compositionally complex alloys (RCCAs) in the nine-element space (Ti, V, Cr, Zr, Nb, Mo, Hf, Ta, W). It combines models for phase stability (BCC target vs. HCP, Laves, B2 competitors) with temperature-dependent mechanical properties, using theory-guided supplementation of yield strength data at ultra-high temperatures (up to 2000 K) and forward sequential feature selection (SFS). The yield strength ML model reports R² = 0.98 across 0–2000 K; elemental impacts are analyzed (Nb stabilizes BCC, Ti improves ductility), and an on-demand designer tool enables custom screening of compositions.

Significance. If the models prove reliable, the framework offers a practical route to exhaustively screen high-dimensional RCCA spaces that are intractable for DFT or experiment alone, potentially accelerating discovery. The reported R² = 0.98 for temperature-dependent yield strength and the interpretable elemental-effect analysis provide concrete guidance for experiments. The on-demand predictor/screener is a usable contribution. Significance depends on transparent validation of the theory supplementation and generalization beyond the training compositions.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract / yield strength modeling] Abstract and yield-strength modeling section: The R² = 0.98 claim for the temperature-dependent yield strength model (0–2000 K) is load-bearing for the on-demand designer framework, yet the abstract and methods provide no equation, reference, or validation metric for the 'established theory' used to supplement data at ultra-high T, nor any separation of experimental vs. supplemented points or hold-out performance on compositions outside the nine-element training set. Without this, systematic bias in the theory (e.g., missing diffusion or phase-instability effects) cannot be ruled out and the high R² does not guarantee reliable extrapolation.
  2. [ML model training / feature selection] Feature selection and model validation subsection: Forward sequential feature selection (SFS) is applied post-supplementation, but no details are given on the number of selected features, cross-validation strategy, train/test splits, or error bars on the R² = 0.98. This is load-bearing because post-hoc SFS on augmented data risks overfitting, undermining the claim that the framework reliably narrows composition space for untested RCCAs.
  3. [Phase stability modeling] Phase stability modeling section: While the framework integrates phase stability predictions, no performance metrics (accuracy, confusion matrices, or validation on known RCCAs) are reported for the BCC vs. competing-phase models, in contrast to the detailed R² for yield strength. This weakens the integrated claim that the designer provides 'all properties' for screening.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Methods / data preparation] Add explicit references and equations for the theory used in yield-strength supplementation at high T.
  2. [Data sources] Clarify the original data sources (experimental vs. DFT) for yield strength and phase stability, and state the total number of data points before/after supplementation.
  3. [Results] Include uncertainty quantification (error bars, confidence intervals) on all reported model metrics and predictions.
  4. [Discussion] Discuss limitations of extrapolation beyond the nine refractory elements and any assumptions about single-phase BCC stability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive review of our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below, providing clarifications and committing to revisions where the manuscript requires additional transparency or metrics.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / yield strength modeling] Abstract and yield-strength modeling section: The R² = 0.98 claim for the temperature-dependent yield strength model (0–2000 K) is load-bearing for the on-demand designer framework, yet the abstract and methods provide no equation, reference, or validation metric for the 'established theory' used to supplement data at ultra-high T, nor any separation of experimental vs. supplemented points or hold-out performance on compositions outside the nine-element training set. Without this, systematic bias in the theory (e.g., missing diffusion or phase-instability effects) cannot be ruled out and the high R² does not guarantee reliable extrapolation.

    Authors: We agree that the description of the theory-guided supplementation requires greater specificity to allow assessment of potential biases. In the revised manuscript, we will add the exact reference and governing equation for the established theory used to generate the ultra-high-temperature yield strength data. We will also explicitly separate the experimental data points from the theory-supplemented points in the methods and results sections and report any available validation metrics for the supplemented values. For generalization, we will include hold-out testing on compositions within the nine-element space that were withheld from training to demonstrate performance beyond the primary training set. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [ML model training / feature selection] Feature selection and model validation subsection: Forward sequential feature selection (SFS) is applied post-supplementation, but no details are given on the number of selected features, cross-validation strategy, train/test splits, or error bars on the R² = 0.98. This is load-bearing because post-hoc SFS on augmented data risks overfitting, undermining the claim that the framework reliably narrows composition space for untested RCCAs.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the current manuscript lacks sufficient detail on the machine-learning pipeline. The revised version will report the exact number of features retained after forward sequential feature selection, the cross-validation procedure (including the number of folds), the train/test split ratios, and error bars or standard deviations associated with the R² = 0.98 value. These additions will clarify the robustness of the model and address concerns about overfitting on the supplemented dataset. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Phase stability modeling] Phase stability modeling section: While the framework integrates phase stability predictions, no performance metrics (accuracy, confusion matrices, or validation on known RCCAs) are reported for the BCC vs. competing-phase models, in contrast to the detailed R² for yield strength. This weakens the integrated claim that the designer provides 'all properties' for screening.

    Authors: We agree that the phase stability models should be accompanied by quantitative performance metrics comparable to those provided for yield strength. In the revised manuscript, we will include accuracy, precision, recall, F1 scores, and confusion matrices for the BCC versus HCP/Laves/B2 classifiers. We will also present validation results on known experimental RCCAs to support the reliability of the integrated screening framework. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in ML framework for RCCA design

full rationale

The paper presents a data-driven ML framework that trains models on experimental yield strength data augmented by theory-guided supplementation at high temperatures, then reports R²=0.98 as the fit quality over 0-2000 K. This is standard reporting of model performance on the training/augmented set rather than a claimed first-principles derivation or independent prediction that reduces to the inputs by construction. No equations, self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes are invoked in a load-bearing way that would create circularity per the enumerated patterns. The central claims (phase stability screening, element impact evaluation, on-demand predictor) remain independent of any self-referential reduction and are falsifiable against external experimental benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract alone supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; ML feature selection and theory supplementation are implicit but unspecified.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5655 in / 1055 out tokens · 56049 ms · 2026-05-10T19:18:21.099342+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages

  1. [16]

    Scientific Reports, 2018

    Jha, D., et al., : Deep Learning the Chemistry of Materials From Only Elemental Composition. Scientific Reports, 2018. 8

    work page 2018

  2. [50]

    High Entropy Alloy v6.1

    George, E.P., W.A. Curtin, and C.C. Tasan, High entropy alloys: A focused review of mechanical properties and deformation mechanisms. Acta Materialia, 2020. 188: p. 435– 474. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION COMPUTATIONAL DETAILS CalPHAD calculations The high -throughput CalPHAD calculations were performed with ThermoCalc (TC) 2023b within its database of “High ...

    work page 2020

  3. [51]

    ∑ 9 8𝑐𝑖∑ 𝑐𝑗 2|𝑟𝑖−𝑟𝑗| 𝑟𝑖+𝑟𝑗 𝑛 𝑗≠𝑖 𝑛 𝑖 𝛿𝑉 Atomic volume mismatch √∑ 𝑐𝑖(1−𝑉𝑖 𝑉) 2𝑛 𝑖 𝑑𝑉 Atomic volume distortion

    work page

  4. [52]

    ∑ 9 8𝑐𝑖∑ 𝑐𝑗 2|𝑉𝑖−𝑉𝑗| 𝑉𝑖+𝑉𝑗 𝑛 𝑗≠𝑖 𝑛 𝑖 ∆𝑆𝑝ℎ𝑎𝑠𝑒 Enthalpy of formation of the phase, where R is the gas constant −𝑅∑ 𝑐𝑖ln𝑐𝑖 𝑛 𝑖 ∆𝐻𝑝ℎ𝑎𝑠𝑒 Enthalpy of formation of the phase From CS database ∆𝐺𝑝ℎ𝑎𝑠𝑒 Gibbs free energy of the phase ∆𝐻𝑝ℎ𝑎𝑠𝑒−𝑇∆𝑆𝑝ℎ𝑎𝑠𝑒 ∆𝐻𝑏2ℎ Phase transformation enthalpy from BCC to HCP phases ∆𝐻ℎ𝑐𝑝−∆𝐻𝑏𝑐𝑐 ∆𝐺𝑏2ℎ Phase transformation Gibbs free energy f...

    work page

  5. [53]

    Advanced Engineering Materials, 2004

    Yeh, J.W., et al., Nanostructured high-entropy alloys with multiple principal elements: Novel alloy design concepts and outcomes. Advanced Engineering Materials, 2004. 6(5): p. 299–303

    work page 2004

  6. [54]

    Materials Science and Engineering a-Structural Materials Properties Microstructure and Processing, 2004

    Cantor, B., et al., Microstructural development in equiatomic multicomponent alloys. Materials Science and Engineering a-Structural Materials Properties Microstructure and Processing, 2004. 375: p. 213–218

    work page 2004

  7. [55]

    Entropy, 2014

    Cantor, B., Multicomponent and High Entropy Alloys. Entropy, 2014. 16(9): p. 4749– 4768

    work page 2014

  8. [56]

    Miracle, and O.N

    Gorsse, S., D.B. Miracle, and O.N. Senkov, Mapping the world of complex concentrated alloys. Acta Materialia, 2017. 135: p. 177–187

    work page 2017

  9. [57]

    Miracle, D.B. and O.N. Senkov, A critical review of high entropy alloys and related concepts. Acta Materialia, 2017. 122: p. 448–511

    work page 2017

  10. [58]

    Raabe, and R.O

    George, E.P., D. Raabe, and R.O. Ritchie, High-entropy alloys. Nature Reviews Materials,

    work page

  11. [59]

    Journal of Materials Research and Technology-Jmr&T, 2024

    Yu, B.X., et al., Recent progress in high-entropy alloys: A focused review of preparation processes and properties. Journal of Materials Research and Technology-Jmr&T, 2024. 29: p. 2689–2719

    work page 2024

  12. [60]

    Computational Quantum Mechanics for Materials Engineers: The Emto Method and Applications, 2007: p

    Vitos, L., The EMTO-CPA Method. Computational Quantum Mechanics for Materials Engineers: The Emto Method and Applications, 2007: p. 83–94

    work page 2007

  13. [61]

    Npj Computational Materials, 2022

    Zhang, J., et al., Composition design of high-entropy alloys with deep sets learning. Npj Computational Materials, 2022. 8(1)

    work page 2022

  14. [62]

    Zhang, Y. and Y. Yue, Simulation and Calculation for Predicting Structures and Properties of High-Entropy Alloys, in High Entropy Materials, Y. Zhang, Editor. 2022, IntechOpen: Rijeka

    work page 2022

  15. [63]

    Computational Materials Science, 2017

    Tian, L.Y., et al., CPA descriptions of random Cu-Au alloys in comparison with SQS approach. Computational Materials Science, 2017. 128: p. 302–309

    work page 2017

  16. [64]

    Journal of Materials Science, 2022

    Karabin, M., et al., Ab initio approaches to high-entropy alloys: a comparison of CPA, SQS, and supercell methods. Journal of Materials Science, 2022. 57(23): p. 10677–10690

    work page 2022

  17. [65]

    Progress in Materials Science, 2004

    Chang, Y.A., et al., Phase diagram calculation: past, present and future. Progress in Materials Science, 2004. 49(3): p. 313–345

    work page 2004

  18. [66]

    Computational Thermodynamics: The Calphad Method

    Lukas, H.L., et al. Computational Thermodynamics: The Calphad Method. 2007

    work page 2007

  19. [67]

    Npj Computational Materials, 2020

    Pei, Z.R., et al., Machine-learning informed prediction of high-entropy solid solution formation: Beyond the Hume-Rothery rules. Npj Computational Materials, 2020. 6(1)

    work page 2020

  20. [68]

    Scientific Reports, 2018

    Jha, D., et al., Deep Learning the Chemistry of Materials From Only Elemental Composition. Scientific Reports, 2018. 8

    work page 2018

  21. [69]

    Npj Computational Materials, 2021

    Feng, S., et al., A general and transferable deep learning framework for predicting phase formation in materials. Npj Computational Materials, 2021. 7(1)

    work page 2021

  22. [70]

    Npj Computational Materials, 2019

    Zhou, Z.Q., et al., Machine learning guided appraisal and exploration of phase design for high entropy alloys. Npj Computational Materials, 2019. 5

    work page 2019

  23. [71]

    Zhang, and Z.R

    Liu, X.L., J.X. Zhang, and Z.R. Pei, Machine learning for high-entropy alloys: Progress, challenges and opportunities. Progress in Materials Science, 2023. 131

    work page 2023

  24. [72]

    Maresca, F. and W.A. Curtin, Mechanistic origin of high strength in refractory BCC high entropy alloys up to 1900K. Acta Materialia, 2020. 182: p. 235–249

    work page 2020

  25. [73]

    Luque, and W.A

    Varvenne, C., A. Luque, and W.A. Curtin, Theory of strengthening in fcc high entropy alloys. Acta Materialia, 2016. 118: p. 164–176

    work page 2016

  26. [74]

    Scientific Reports, 2022

    Dovale-Farelo, V., et al., Vickers hardness prediction from machine learning methods. Scientific Reports, 2022. 12(1)

    work page 2022

  27. [75]

    Npj Computational Materials, 2022

    Beniwal, D., et al., Distilling physical origins of hardness in multi-principal element alloys directly from ensemble neural network models. Npj Computational Materials, 2022. 8(1)

    work page 2022

  28. [76]

    Npj Computational Materials, 2022

    Giles, S.A., et al., Machine-learning-based intelligent framework for discovering refractory high-entropy alloys with improved high-temperature yield strength. Npj Computational Materials, 2022. 8(1)

    work page 2022

  29. [77]

    Science, 2022

    Rao, Z.Y., et al., Machine learning-enabled high-entropy alloy discovery. Science, 2022. 378(6615): p. 78–84

    work page 2022

  30. [78]

    Npj Computational Materials, 2023

    Luo, Y.F., et al., Predicting lattice thermal conductivity via machine learning: a mini review. Npj Computational Materials, 2023. 9(1)

    work page 2023

  31. [79]

    Nature Communications, 2021

    Lee, C.H., et al., Strength can be controlled by edge dislocations in refractory high- entropy alloys. Nature Communications, 2021. 12(1)

    work page 2021

  32. [80]

    Calphad-Computer Coupling of Phase Diagrams and Thermochemistry, 2002

    Andersson, J.O., et al., THERMO-CALC & DICTRA, computational tools for materials science. Calphad-Computer Coupling of Phase Diagrams and Thermochemistry, 2002. 26(2): p. 273–312

    work page 2002

  33. [81]

    Pattern Recognition in Practice Iv: Multiple Paradigms, Comparative Studies and Hybrid Systems, 1994

    Ferri, F.J., et al., Comparative Study of Techniques for Large-Scale Feature Selection. Pattern Recognition in Practice Iv: Multiple Paradigms, Comparative Studies and Hybrid Systems, 1994. 16: p. 403–413

    work page 1994

  34. [82]

    Novovicova, and J

    Pudil, P., J. Novovicova, and J. Kittler, Floating Search Methods in Feature-Selection. Pattern Recognition Letters, 1994. 15(11): p. 1119–1125

    work page 1994

  35. [83]

    Annals of Statistics, 2001

    Friedman, J.H., Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. Annals of Statistics, 2001. 29(5): p. 1189–1232

    work page 2001

  36. [84]

    Kresse, G. and J. Furthmuller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Physical Review B, 1996. 54(16): p. 11169– 11186

    work page 1996

  37. [85]

    Kresse, G. and J. Furthmuller, Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Computational Materials Science,

    work page

  38. [86]

    Abrikosov, and B

    Vitos, L., I.A. Abrikosov, and B. Johansson, Anisotropic lattice distortions in random alloys from first-principles theory. Physical Review Letters, 2001. 87(15)

    work page 2001

  39. [87]

    Scripta Materialia, 2021

    Bokas, G.B., et al., Unveiling the thermodynamic driving forces for high entropy alloys formation through big data ab initio analysis. Scripta Materialia, 2021. 202

    work page 2021

  40. [88]

    Data in Brief, 2018

    Couzinié, J.-P., et al., Comprehensive data compilation on the mechanical properties of refractory high-entropy alloys. Data in Brief, 2018. 21: p. 1622–1641

    work page 2018

  41. [89]

    Scientific Data, 2020

    Borg, C.K.H., et al., Expanded dataset of mechanical properties and observed phases of multi-principal element alloys. Scientific Data, 2020. 7(1)

    work page 2020

  42. [90]

    Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2011

    Pedregosa, F., et al., Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2011. 12: p. 2825–2830

    work page 2011

  43. [91]

    Nature Machine Intelligence, 2020

    Lundberg, S.M., et al., From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees. Nature Machine Intelligence, 2020. 2(1): p. 56–67

    work page 2020

  44. [92]

    Lundberg, S. SHAP. 2018; Available from: https://shap.readthedocs.io/en/latest/

    work page 2018

  45. [93]

    Acta Materialia, 2024

    Miracle, D.B., et al., Strength vs temperature for refractory complex concentrated alloys (RCCAs): A critical comparison with refractory BCC elements and dilute alloys. Acta Materialia, 2024. 266

    work page 2024

  46. [94]

    Science and Technology of Advanced Materials, 2022

    Tseng, K.K., et al., Edge-dislocation-induced ultrahigh elevated-temperature strength of HfMoNbTaW refractory high-entropy alloys. Science and Technology of Advanced Materials, 2022. 23(1): p. 642–654

    work page 2022

  47. [95]

    Science, 2020

    Wang, F.L., et al., Multiplicity of dislocation pathways in a refractory multiprincipal element alloy. Science, 2020. 370(6512): p. 95–+

    work page 2020

  48. [96]

    Maresca, and W.A

    Baruffi, C., F. Maresca, and W.A. Curtin, Screw vs. edge dislocation strengthening in body-centered-cubic high entrophy alloys and implications for guided alloy design. Mrs Communications, 2022. 12(6): p. 1111–1118

    work page 2022

  49. [97]

    Senkov, O.N. and D.B. Miracle, A new thermodynamic parameter to predict formation of solid solution or intermetallic phases in high entropy alloys. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2016. 658: p. 603–607

    work page 2016

  50. [98]

    Available from: https://scipy.org/

    Scipy. Available from: https://scipy.org/

    work page

  51. [99]

    Transition metal alloys

    "Boer, F.R.d., et al., Cohesion in metals. Transition metal alloys. 1988, Netherlands: Amsterdam, Netherlands; North-Holland;. Medium: X; Size: Pages: (774 p)

    work page 1988

  52. [100]

    Scientific Data, 2015

    de Jong, M., et al., Charting the complete elastic properties of inorganic crystalline compounds. Scientific Data, 2015. 2

    work page 2015

  53. [101]

    Gorsse, and D.B

    Senkov, O.N., S. Gorsse, and D.B. Miracle, High temperature strength of refractory complex concentrated alloys. Acta Materialia, 2019. 175: p. 394–405

    work page 2019

  54. [102]

    Curtin, and C.C

    George, E.P., W.A. Curtin, and C.C. Tasan, High entropy alloys: A focused review of mechanical properties and deformation mechanisms. Acta Materialia, 2020. 188: p. 435– 474

    work page 2020

  55. [103]

    Burke, and M

    Perdew, J.P., K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Physical Review Letters, 1996. 77(18): p. 3865–3868

    work page 1996

  56. [104]

    Computational Quantum Mechanics for Materials Engineers: The Emto Method and Applications, 2007: p

    Vitos, L., Full Charge Density Technique. Computational Quantum Mechanics for Materials Engineers: The Emto Method and Applications, 2007: p. 58–80

    work page 2007

  57. [105]

    Levämäki, H. and M. Ropo. pyEMTO. 2015; Available from: https://pyemto.readthedocs.io/en/latest/features.html

    work page 2015

  58. [106]

    Burke, and M

    Perdew, J.P., K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple (vol 77, pg 3865, 1996). Physical Review Letters, 1997. 78(7): p. 1396–1396

    work page 1996

  59. [107]

    Physical Review Letters, 2008

    Perdew, J.P., et al., Restoring the density-gradient expansion for exchange in solids and surfaces. Physical Review Letters, 2008. 100(13)

    work page 2008

  60. [108]

    Available from: https://periodictable.com/index.html

    Mathematica. Available from: https://periodictable.com/index.html

    work page

  61. [109]

    Fisher, E.S. and C.J. Renken, Single-Crystal Elastic Moduli + Hcp to Bcc Transformation in Ti,Zr, + Hf. Physical Review a-General Physics, 1964. 135(2a): p. A482–&

    work page 1964

  62. [110]

    Ruban, and P.A

    Razumovskiy, V.I., A.V. Ruban, and P.A. Korzhavyi, First-principles study of elastic properties of Cr- and Fe-rich Fe-Cr alloys. Physical Review B, 2011. 84(2)

    work page 2011

  63. [111]

    Physical Review B, 2005

    Bernstein, N., et al., Tight-binding calculations of the band structure and total energies of the various polytypes of silicon carbide. Physical Review B, 2005. 71(7)

    work page 2005

  64. [112]

    Calphad-Computer Coupling of Phase Diagrams and Thermochemistry, 2013

    van de Walle, A., et al., Efficient stochastic generation of special quasirandom structures. Calphad-Computer Coupling of Phase Diagrams and Thermochemistry, 2013. 42: p. 13– 18

    work page 2013

  65. [113]

    Physical Review B, 1993

    Mehl, M.J., Pressure-Dependence of the Elastic-Moduli in Aluminum-Rich Al-Li Compounds. Physical Review B, 1993. 47(5): p. 2493–2500

    work page 1993

  66. [114]

    Annalen der Physik, 1889

    Voigt, W., Ueber die Beziehung zwischen den beiden Elasticitätsconstanten isotroper Körper. Annalen der Physik, 1889. 274(12): p. 573–587

    work page

  67. [115]

    Zeitschrift Fur Angewandte Mathematik Und Mechanik,

    Reuss, A., Account of the liquid limit of mixed crystals on the basis of the plasticity condition for single crystal. Zeitschrift Fur Angewandte Mathematik Und Mechanik,

    work page

  68. [116]

    Proceedings of the Physical Society of London Section A, 1952

    Hill, R., The Elastic Behaviour of a Crystalline Aggregate. Proceedings of the Physical Society of London Section A, 1952. 65(389): p. 349–355

    work page 1952

  69. [117]

    Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series a-Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 1948

    Tabor, D., A Simple Theory of Static and Dynamic Hardness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series a-Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 1948. 192(1029): p. 247–274

    work page 1948

  70. [118]

    and P.E.J

    Toda-Caraballo, I. and P.E.J. Rivera-Díaz-del-Castillo, Modelling solid solution hardening in high entropy alloys. Acta Materialia, 2015. 85: p. 14–23

    work page 2015

  71. [119]

    Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2017

    Yao, H.W., et al., Mechanical properties of refractory high-entropy alloys: Experiments and modeling. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2017. 696: p. 1139–1150

    work page 2017