pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.06118 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-07 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-th· math.QA

Algebraic approach to quantum gravity IV: applications

Shahn Majid This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 18:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-thmath.QA
keywords quantum gravityquantum spacetimeRiemannian geometryKaluza-KleinNoether chargesgeodesicsblack holesphase transition
0
0 comments X

The pith

Quantum spacetime framework derives Kaluza-Klein theory, conserved lattice charges, and generally covariant quantum mechanics for black holes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper demonstrates that quantum spacetime and quantum Riemannian geometry, developed algebraically, apply to physics by enabling concrete calculations and derivations in quantum gravity models. These include the vacuum energy from curvature fluctuations in a single-plaquette setup, the Kaluza-Klein ansatz emerging directly from the quantum structure, exactly conserved Noether charges obtained via variational calculus on lattices, and a new theory of classical and quantum geodesics. The geodesics theory then supports a generally covariant quantum mechanics usable in general relativity, with initial results for black holes, plus a phase transition identified in Euclidean quantum gravity on a 4-pointed star. A sympathetic reader would care because these results show how algebraic models can produce physical insights into gravity's quantum aspects without traditional quantization, potentially addressing issues like vacuum energy or extending classical concepts to quantum regimes.

Core claim

The algebraic approach to quantum gravity yields a calculation of the vacuum energy of spacetime curvature fluctuations in a single-plaquette model, a derivation of the Kaluza-Klein ansatz as a consequence of quantum spacetime, exactly conserved Noether charges from variational calculus on a lattice, and a new theory of classical and quantum geodesics; the latter supports a generally covariant quantum mechanics applicable in general relativity with intriguing first results for a black hole, while Euclidean quantum gravity on a 4-pointed star exhibits a phase transition.

What carries the argument

The quantum spacetime and quantum Riemannian geometry framework, which encodes algebraic quantum features to enable derivations of physical quantities like energies, charges, and geodesics in gravity models.

If this is right

  • The vacuum energy of spacetime curvature fluctuations can be calculated explicitly in the single-plaquette model of quantum gravity.
  • The Kaluza-Klein ansatz follows as a direct consequence of the quantum spacetime structure.
  • Variational calculus on a lattice produces exactly conserved Noether charges.
  • A theory of generally covariant quantum mechanics arises from the quantum geodesics and applies within general relativity, including to black holes.
  • Euclidean quantum gravity on a 4-pointed star undergoes a phase transition.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The black hole results could imply new quantum corrections to geodesic motion or energy levels near horizons that differ from classical general relativity.
  • The derivation of Kaluza-Klein from quantum spacetime might extend to other unification problems by varying the underlying algebra.
  • Simplified models like the 4-pointed star could be used to test phase transitions in more complex lattice approximations of quantum gravity.
  • The generally covariant quantum mechanics might connect to existing approaches by providing a discrete or algebraic route to wave equations in curved spacetime.

Load-bearing premise

The quantum spacetime and quantum Riemannian geometry developed in prior papers correctly encode the quantum aspects of gravity, so calculations in simplified models like the single-plaquette or 4-pointed star represent physical phenomena.

What would settle it

A direct computation or simulation showing that the vacuum energy in the single-plaquette model differs from independent physical estimates, or that Noether charges fail to conserve exactly in a lattice variational setup.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.06118 by Shahn Majid.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Quantum gravity on a 4-pointed star graph for two different measures for the metric variables integration, as a function of the coupling constant G. The Liouville measure case (b) shows a phase transition at G = 2. spike in the L∆R(i) plot there at G = 8.2 was removed by hand (as an artefact removable with more precision). There is still a degree of numerical noise visible in the plots, which should be ign… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) revisited partition and expectation value functions zi(L¯) for quantum gravity on a square (b) relative uncertainty and correlators. 4dk0dl0dkdl k0l0 and the partition function becomes Z = |Z1| 2 , where Z1 = 2 Z 1 −1 dk Z L ϵ dk0k0e i G k0α(k) = −4G 2 Z 1 0 dk d dα |α=α(k) e iL G α − e iϵ G α α = −16G 2 Z ∞ 0 dα α 1 2 (8 + α) 3 2 d dα [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a) Horizon modes generated at the horizon when an initial real dipole is swallowed by the black-hole can lower the classical entropy S(ψ(s))) but (b) not when the two parts of the initial dipole are sufficiently separated so as to not interfere. The classical entropy relative to the initial ψ(0) nevertheless increases. The entropy increasing is one of the things that suggests that this could be a physical… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Mass spectrum mKG from [41] of ‘atomic’ solutions of the Klein-Gordon equations inside the black-hole in units of ℏ/rs for different value of domain cutoff δ = zmin/rs and for pt = −ℏ/rs. Here k is the number of main zero-crossings in ψ away from the horizon as shown for k = 4. in units of ℏ/rs i.e. in units of the mass of a particle whose Compton wavelength was the Schwarzschild radius, after we put back … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Variational double complex in the classical case. proposed to look at Ω(J∞) and require on it the structure of a double complex as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We provide a relatively self-contained introduction to the application of quantum spacetime and quantum Riemannian geometry to theoretical physics. Recent successes include calculation of the vacuum energy of spacetime curvature fluctuations in a single-plaquette model of quantum gravity, derivation of the Kaluza-Klein ansatz as a consequence of quantum spacetime, exactly conserved Noether charges from variational calculus on a lattice, and a new theory of classical and quantum geodesics. The latter leads to a theory of generally covariant quantum mechanics applicable in General Relativity with intriguing first results for the case of a black-hole. We discuss several open problems past and present, and how they might be addressed going forward. New results include a phase transition for Euclidean quantum gravity on a 4-pointed star.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript provides a relatively self-contained introduction to applications of quantum spacetime and quantum Riemannian geometry. It reports recent results including the vacuum energy of curvature fluctuations in a single-plaquette model, derivation of the Kaluza-Klein ansatz from the framework, exactly conserved Noether charges via lattice variational calculus, a new theory of classical and quantum geodesics, and the resulting generally covariant quantum mechanics applied to General Relativity with first results for a black hole. A new result is a phase transition in Euclidean quantum gravity on a 4-pointed star. The paper also discusses open problems.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work would offer a novel algebraic route to quantum gravity that derives classical features such as Kaluza-Klein theory and exactly conserved charges without additional assumptions. The lattice Noether charges and the reported phase transition constitute concrete, potentially falsifiable outputs. The extension to generally covariant quantum mechanics for black holes could open new avenues if the discrete-to-continuum connection is established. These strengths are offset by the framework's dependence on prior papers in the series.

major comments (2)
  1. [Black-hole applications] Black-hole section: The claim that the new geodesic construction yields a theory of generally covariant quantum mechanics 'applicable in General Relativity' with 'intriguing first results' for a black hole is load-bearing, yet the manuscript provides no explicit check that the discrete Noether charges or geodesic equations recover the standard GR Killing vectors or geodesic deviation equation in the continuum limit (e.g., when lattice spacing vanishes or the model is embedded in a Schwarzschild background).
  2. [Single-plaquette and star models] Single-plaquette and 4-pointed-star sections: The vacuum-energy calculation and the reported phase transition are presented as successes, but without quantitative error estimates, continuum-limit comparisons, or benchmarks against independent approaches, it remains unclear whether these simplified models faithfully capture the relevant quantum degrees of freedom or merely reflect lattice artifacts.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract asserts multiple 'successes' and 'intriguing first results' without any equations, numerical values, or derivation outlines; moving at least one key quantitative result into the abstract would improve reader assessment of the claims.
  2. [Introduction] Notation for the quantum Riemannian geometry objects (e.g., the precise definition of the quantum metric or connection used in the geodesic equation) is referenced to prior works; a brief self-contained recap in an appendix would aid readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive feedback on the manuscript. We address the two major comments point by point below, indicating where revisions have been made to clarify the scope and limitations of the presented results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Black-hole applications] Black-hole section: The claim that the new geodesic construction yields a theory of generally covariant quantum mechanics 'applicable in General Relativity' with 'intriguing first results' for a black hole is load-bearing, yet the manuscript provides no explicit check that the discrete Noether charges or geodesic equations recover the standard GR Killing vectors or geodesic deviation equation in the continuum limit (e.g., when lattice spacing vanishes or the model is embedded in a Schwarzschild background).

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript does not contain an explicit continuum-limit verification recovering the standard GR Killing vectors or geodesic deviation equation. The phrasing 'applicable in General Relativity with intriguing first results' is intended to indicate that the discrete framework has been applied to a black-hole background to obtain preliminary results, while the full continuum connection is listed among the open problems discussed in the paper. We have revised the relevant section to explicitly state that the current results are preliminary and do not yet include a derivation of the continuum limit, and we have added a short paragraph outlining the technical steps that would be required for such a limit. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Single-plaquette and star models] Single-plaquette and 4-pointed-star sections: The vacuum-energy calculation and the reported phase transition are presented as successes, but without quantitative error estimates, continuum-limit comparisons, or benchmarks against independent approaches, it remains unclear whether these simplified models faithfully capture the relevant quantum degrees of freedom or merely reflect lattice artifacts.

    Authors: These sections present exact calculations within highly simplified models chosen to permit closed-form results in the algebraic framework. We acknowledge that the absence of error estimates, continuum extrapolations, or external benchmarks leaves open the possibility of lattice artifacts. We have added a dedicated paragraph in each section discussing the models' limitations, the rationale for expecting the phase transition to be physical (based on the underlying quantum Riemannian geometry), and the need for future larger-lattice studies to confirm robustness. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • A complete numerical or analytic demonstration that the discrete Noether charges and geodesic equations recover the standard GR continuum expressions when the lattice spacing vanishes or the model is placed in a Schwarzschild background.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; applications build on prior framework but present independent calculations

full rationale

The paper describes itself as providing a relatively self-contained introduction to applications of quantum spacetime and quantum Riemannian geometry. It lists specific recent successes (vacuum energy in single-plaquette model, Kaluza-Klein ansatz derivation, conserved Noether charges, new geodesics theory) and new results (phase transition on 4-pointed star, first results for black-hole geodesics). No quoted equations or sections demonstrate that any central prediction reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or unverified self-citation chain. The geodesic and QM applications are presented as new developments within the paper, with the framework treated as established input rather than redefined here. This is a standard theoretical series paper with no exhibited circular reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The abstract supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the entire program presupposes the quantum spacetime and quantum Riemannian geometry structures defined in the preceding papers of the series.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5411 in / 1278 out tokens · 122547 ms · 2026-05-10T18:58:47.478963+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Indefinite probabilities in quantum spacetime: A deepening of unpredictability

    quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    SU_q(2) quantum group applied to spin-1/2 rotations yields non-commuting probability operators, an uncertainty principle for probabilities, and non-commutative rotation matrices between observers.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Amelino-Camelia and S

    G. Amelino-Camelia and S. Majid, Waves on noncommutative spacetime and gamma-ray bursts, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 15 (2000) 4301–4323

    work page 2000

  2. [2]

    Amelino-Camelia, G

    G. Amelino-Camelia, G. D’Amico, G. Rosati and N. Loret, In-vacuo-dispersion features for GRB neutrinos and photons, arXiv: 1612.02765 (astro-ph.QA)

    work page arXiv

  3. [3]

    Amelino-Cameliaet al., Redshift leverage for the search of GRB neutrinos affected by quantum properties of spacetime, J

    G. Amelino-Cameliaet al., Redshift leverage for the search of GRB neutrinos affected by quantum properties of spacetime, J. Cosm. Astrop. Phys. 02 (2026) 035

    work page 2026

  4. [4]

    Anderson, Introduction to variational bicomplex, Contemp

    I. Anderson, Introduction to variational bicomplex, Contemp. Math. 132 (1992) 51–73 ALGEBRAIC APPROACH TO QUANTUM GRAVITY IV: APPLICATIONS 37

    work page 1992

  5. [5]

    Argota-Quiroz and S

    J. Argota-Quiroz and S. Majid, J. Argota-Quiroz and S. Majid, Quantum gravity on polygons andR×Z n FLRW model, Class. Quantum Grav. 37 (2020) 245001 (43pp)

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Argota-Quiroz and S

    J. Argota-Quiroz and S. Majid, Quantum Riemannian geometry of the discrete interval and q-deformation, J. Math. Phys. 64 (2023) 051701

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Argota-Quiroz and S

    J. Argota-Quiroz and S. Majid, Quantum gravity on finite spacetimes and dynamical mass, Corfu Summer Institute 2021: School and Workshops on Elementary Particle Physics and Gravity, PoS (2022) 210 (41pp)

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Aschieri and A

    P. Aschieri and A. Schenkel, Noncommutative connections on bimodules and Drinfeld twist deformation, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 18 (2014) 513–612

    work page 2014

  9. [9]

    Aschieri and T

    P. Aschieri and T. Weber, Metric compatibility and Levi-Civita connections on quantum groups, J. Algebra 661(2025) 479–544

    work page 2025

  10. [10]

    Beggs, Noncommutative geodesics and the KSGNS construction, J

    E.J. Beggs, Noncommutative geodesics and the KSGNS construction, J. Geom. Phys. 158 (2020) 103851

    work page 2020

  11. [11]

    Beggs, X

    E. Beggs, X. Han and S. Majid, *-Hopf algebroids, arXiv: 2412.21089 (math.QA)

    work page arXiv

  12. [12]

    E. J. Beggs and S. Majid,Quantum Riemannian Geometry, Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, vol. 355, Springer, 2020

    work page 2020

  13. [13]

    Beggs and S

    E.J. Beggs and S. Majid, Nonassociative Riemannian geometry by twisting, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 254 (2010) 012002 (29pp)

    work page 2010

  14. [14]

    E. J. Beggs and S. Majid, Quantum geodesic flows and curvature, Lett. Math. Phys. 113 (2023) 73 (44pp)

    work page 2023

  15. [15]

    Beggs and S

    E. Beggs and S. Majid, Quantum geodesic flows on graphs, Lett. Math. Phys. 114 (2024) 112 (41pp)

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    Beggs and S

    E.J. Beggs and S. Majid, Quantum geodesics in quantum mechanics, J. Math. Phys. 65 (2024) (44pp)

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    E. J. Beggs and S. Majid, Generally covariant quantum mechanics, Lett. Math. Phys. 116 (2026) 9 (65pp)

    work page 2026

  18. [18]

    E. J. Beggs and S. Majid, Klein-Gordon flow on FLRW spacetimes, arXiv:2501.18295

    work page arXiv

  19. [19]

    Blitz and S

    S. Blitz and S. Majid, Quantum curvature fluctuations and the cosmological constant in a single plaquette quantum gravity model, Class. Quantum Grav. Lett. 42 (2025) 04LT01 (12pp)

    work page 2025

  20. [20]

    Carlip, Hiding the cosmological constant Phys

    S. Carlip, Hiding the cosmological constant Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 131302

    work page 2019

  21. [21]

    Carow-Watamura, M

    U. Carow-Watamura, M. Schlieker, M. Scholl, and S. Watamura. Tensor representation of the quantum group SLq(2,C) and quantum Minkowski space. Z. Phys. C, 48 (1990) 159

    work page 1990

  22. [22]

    Connes,Noncommutative Geometry, Academic Press, 1994

    A. Connes,Noncommutative Geometry, Academic Press, 1994

    work page 1994

  23. [23]

    Connes, Geometry from the spectral point of view, Lett

    A. Connes, Geometry from the spectral point of view, Lett. Math. Phys. 34 (1995) 203–238

    work page 1995

  24. [24]

    Connes and D

    A. Connes and D. Kreimer, Renormalization in quantum field theory and the Riemann-Hilbert problem, II, Commun. Math. Phys. 216 (2001) 215–241

    work page 2001

  25. [25]

    Coquereaux and A.Jadczyk,Riemannian Geometry Fiber Bundles, Kaluza-Klein Theories and All That

    R. Coquereaux and A.Jadczyk,Riemannian Geometry Fiber Bundles, Kaluza-Klein Theories and All That. World Scientific, 1988

    work page 1988

  26. [26]

    Cowtan and S

    A. Cowtan and S. Majid, Quantum double aspects of surface code models, J. Math. Phys. 63 (2022) 042202 (49pp)

    work page 2022

  27. [27]

    Cowtan and S

    A. Cowtan and S. Majid, Algebraic aspects of boundaries in the Kitaev quantum double model, J. Math. Phys. 64 (2023) 051701 (60pp)

    work page 2023

  28. [28]

    Drinfeld, Quantum group, Proc

    V.G. Drinfeld, Quantum group, Proc. ICM Berkeley 1986. AMS

    work page 1986

  29. [29]

    Doplicher, K

    S. Doplicher, K. Fredenhagen and J. E. Roberts, The quantum structure of spacetime at the Planck scale and quantum fields, Commun. Math. Phys. 172 (1995) 187–220

    work page 1995

  30. [30]

    Dowker, Introduction to causal sets and their phenomenology

    F. Dowker, Introduction to causal sets and their phenomenology. General Rel. and Grav. 45 (2013) 1651–1667

    work page 2013

  31. [31]

    Dubois-Violette and P.W

    M. Dubois-Violette and P.W. Michor, Connections on central bimodules in noncommutative differential geometry, J. Geom. Phys. 20 (1996) 218–232

    work page 1996

  32. [32]

    Flood, M

    K.J. Flood, M. Mantegazza, H. Winther, Jet functors in noncommutative geometry. Selecta Math. 31 (2025) 70 (107pp)

    work page 2025

  33. [33]

    Freidel and S

    L. Freidel and S. Majid, Noncommutative harmonic analysis, sampling theory and the Duflo map in 2+1 quantum gravity, Class. Quant. Gravity 25 (2008) 045006 (37pp)

    work page 2008

  34. [34]

    Ghobadi, Isotropy quotients of Hopf algebroids and the fundamental groupoid of digraphs, J

    A. Ghobadi, Isotropy quotients of Hopf algebroids and the fundamental groupoid of digraphs, J. Algebra 610 (2022) 591–631

    work page 2022

  35. [35]

    Grosse and M

    H. Grosse and M. Wohlgenannt, Onκ-deformation and UV/IR mixing Nucl. Phys. B (2006) 748–473

    work page 2006

  36. [36]

    Han and S

    X. Han and S. Majid, Quantum jet Hopf algebroids by cotwist, arXiv: 2507.02848 (math.QA)

    work page arXiv

  37. [37]

    G.’t Hooft, Quantization of point particles in 2+1 dimensional gravity and space-time dis- creteness, Class. Quant. Grav. 13 (1996) 1023

    work page 1996

  38. [38]

    A. Y. Kitaev, Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons, Ann. Phys. 303 (2003) 2–30

    work page 2003

  39. [39]

    Klim and S

    J. Klim and S. Majid, J. Klim and S. Majid, Hopf quasigroups and the algebraic 7-sphere, J. Algebra, 323 (2010) 3067–3110 38 SHAHN MAJID

    work page 2010

  40. [40]

    Kullback and R.A

    S. Kullback and R.A. Leibler, On information and sufficiency, Ann. Math. Stat. 22 (1951) 79–86

    work page 1951

  41. [41]

    Kumar and S

    K. Kumar and S. Majid, Geodesic flows on a black-hole background, arXiv: 2603.03222 (gr-qc)

    work page arXiv

  42. [42]

    Kumar and S

    K. Kumar and S. Majid, Mathematica code foribidNotebook Archive

    work page

  43. [43]

    Liu and S

    C. Liu and S. Majid, Quantum geodesics on quantum Minkowski spacetime, J. Physics A, 55 (2022) 424003

    work page 2022

  44. [44]

    Liu and S

    C. Liu and S. Majid, Quantum Kaluza-Klein theory withM 2(C), J. High Energ. Phys. (2023) 102 (33pp)

    work page 2023

  45. [45]

    Liu and S

    C. Liu and S. Majid, Yang-Mills fields from fuzzy sphere quantum Kaluza-Klein model, J. High Energ. Phys. 07 (2024) 195

    work page 2024

  46. [46]

    Liu and S

    C. Liu and S. Majid, Fermions in the fuzzy sphere Kaluza-Klein model, J. Math. Phys. 66 (2025) 112301 (15pp)

    work page 2025

  47. [47]

    Liu and S

    C. Liu and S. Majid, Kaluza-Klein ansatz from Lorentzian quantum gravity on the fuzzy sphere, Euro. Phys. Jour. C 85 (2025) 1464 (12pp)

    work page 2025

  48. [48]

    Lott and C

    J. Lott and C. Villani, Ricci curvature for metric-measure spaces via optimal transport, Ann. of Math. 169 (2009) 903–991

    work page 2009

  49. [49]

    Lukierski, H

    J. Lukierski, H. Ruegg, A. Nowicki and V.N. Tolstoy, q-Deformation of Poincar´ e algebra, Phys. Lett. B 264 (1991) 331

    work page 1991

  50. [50]

    Majid, Hopf algebras for physics at the Planck scale, Class

    S. Majid, Hopf algebras for physics at the Planck scale, Class. Quant. Grav. 5 (1988) 1587– 1607

    work page 1988

  51. [51]

    Majid, q-Euclidean space and quantum Wick rotation by twisting, J

    S. Majid, q-Euclidean space and quantum Wick rotation by twisting, J. Math. Phys. 35 (1994) 5025–5033

    work page 1994

  52. [52]

    Majid, Algebras and Hopf algebras in braided categories, in Lec

    S. Majid, Algebras and Hopf algebras in braided categories, in Lec. Notes Pure and Applied Maths 158 (1994) 55–105. Marcel Dekker

    work page 1994

  53. [53]

    Majid,Foundations of quantum group theory, Cambridge Univ

    S. Majid,Foundations of quantum group theory, Cambridge Univ. Press. (1996, 2000)

    work page 1996

  54. [54]

    Majid, Meaning of noncommutative geometry and the Planck-scale quantum group, Springer Lect

    S. Majid, Meaning of noncommutative geometry and the Planck-scale quantum group, Springer Lect. Notes Phys. 541 (2000) 227-276

    work page 2000

  55. [55]

    Majid, Algebraic approach to quantum gravity III: noncommutative Riemannian geometry, inMathematical and Physical Aspects of Quantum Gravity,eds

    S. Majid, Algebraic approach to quantum gravity III: noncommutative Riemannian geometry, inMathematical and Physical Aspects of Quantum Gravity,eds. B. Fauser, J. Tolksdorf and E. Zeidler, Birkhauser (2006) 77-100

    work page 2006

  56. [56]

    Majid, Algebraic approach to quantum gravity II: noncommutative spacetimes, inAp- proaches to Quantum Gravity,ed

    S. Majid, Algebraic approach to quantum gravity II: noncommutative spacetimes, inAp- proaches to Quantum Gravity,ed. D. Oriti. C.U.P. (2009) 466–492

    work page 2009

  57. [57]

    Majid, Almost commutative Riemannian geometry: wave operators, Commun

    S. Majid, Almost commutative Riemannian geometry: wave operators, Commun. Math. Phys. 310 (2012) 569–609

    work page 2012

  58. [58]

    Majid, Noncommutative Riemannian geometry of graphs, J

    S. Majid, Noncommutative Riemannian geometry of graphs, J. Geom. Phys. 69 (2013) 74–93

    work page 2013

  59. [59]

    Majid, Algebraic approach to quantum gravity I: relative realism

    S. Majid, Algebraic approach to quantum gravity I: relative realism. InProceedings of Road to Reality with Roger Penrose, eds., J. Ladyman et al, Copernicus Center Press (2015) 117–177

    work page 2015

  60. [60]

    Majid, Quantum gravity on a square graph, Class

    S. Majid, Quantum gravity on a square graph, Class. Quantum Grav 36 (2019) 245009 (23pp)

    work page 2019

  61. [61]

    Majid, Quantum Riemannian geometry and particle creation on the integer line, Class

    S. Majid, Quantum Riemannian geometry and particle creation on the integer line, Class. Quantum Grav 36 (2019) 135011 (22pp)

    work page 2019

  62. [62]

    Majid, Quantum gravity:are we there yet? Phil

    S. Majid, Quantum gravity:are we there yet? Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A 383 (2025) 20230377 (20pp)

    work page 2025

  63. [63]

    Majid, Quantum and braided ZX calculus, J

    S. Majid, Quantum and braided ZX calculus, J. Phys. A 55 (2022) 254007 (35pp)

    work page 2022

  64. [64]

    Majid and L.S

    S. Majid and L.S. McCormack, Quantum geometric Wigner construction for D(G) and braided racks, J. Math. Phys. 66 (2025) 061701 (59pp)

    work page 2025

  65. [65]

    Majid and R

    S. Majid and R. Oeckl, Twisting of quantum differentials and the Planck scale Hopf algebra, Commun. Math. Phys. 205 (1999) 617–655

    work page 1999

  66. [66]

    Majid and P.K

    S. Majid and P.K. Osei, Quasitriangular structure and twisting of the 2+1 bicrossproduct model, J. High Energ. Phys. 1 (2018) 147 (28pp)

    work page 2018

  67. [67]

    Majid and H

    S. Majid and H. Ruegg, Bicrossproduct structure of theκ-Poincar´ e group and non- commu- tative geometry, Phys. Lett. B. 334 (1994) 348–354

    work page 1994

  68. [68]

    Majid and B

    S. Majid and B. Schroers, q-Deformation and semidualisation in 3D quantum gravity, J. Phys A 42 (2009) 425402 (40pp)

    work page 2009

  69. [69]

    Majid and F

    S. Majid and F. Simao, Quantum jet bundles, Lett. Math. Phys. (2023) 113:120 (60pp)

    work page 2023

  70. [70]

    Majid and F

    S. Majid and F. Simao, Finite group gauge theory on graphs and gravity-like modes, Nucl. Phys. B 1020 (2025) 117117 (38pp)

    work page 2025

  71. [71]

    Majid and F

    S. Majid and F. Simao, Quantum variational calculus on a lattice, arXiv: 2508.02628 (hep-th)

    work page arXiv

  72. [72]

    Majid and W.-Q

    S. Majid and W.-Q. Tao, Cosmological constant from quantum spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 124028 (12pp)

    work page 2015

  73. [73]

    Manin,Topics in noncommutative geometry, M.B

    Y.I. Manin,Topics in noncommutative geometry, M.B. Porter Lectures, Princeton University Press, 1991

    work page 1991

  74. [74]

    Mourad, Linear connections in noncommutative geometry, Class

    J. Mourad, Linear connections in noncommutative geometry, Class. Quant. Grav. 12 (1995) 965–974 ALGEBRAIC APPROACH TO QUANTUM GRAVITY IV: APPLICATIONS 39

    work page 1995

  75. [75]

    Nielsen, A

    N.G. Nielsen, A. Palessandro and M.S. Sloth, Gravitational atoms. Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 123011

    work page 2019

  76. [76]

    Olsthoorn, Relativistic fluid dynamics, Waterloo Math

    J. Olsthoorn, Relativistic fluid dynamics, Waterloo Math. Rev. 1 (2011) 44–58

    work page 2011

  77. [77]

    Penrose, On gravity’s role in quantum state reduction, General Relativity and Gravitation 28 (1996) 581–600

    R. Penrose, On gravity’s role in quantum state reduction, General Relativity and Gravitation 28 (1996) 581–600

    work page 1996

  78. [78]

    Snyder, Quantized space-time, Phys

    H.S. Snyder, Quantized space-time, Phys. Rev. 71 (1947) 38–41

    work page 1947

  79. [79]

    Wang and W

    Q. Wang and W. Unruh, Vacuum fluctuation, microcyclic universes and the cosmological con- stant problem Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 023537

    work page 2019

  80. [80]

    Zuckerman, Action principles and global geometry, in Ed

    G. Zuckerman, Action principles and global geometry, in Ed. S.T Yau,Proceedings of the Conference on Mathematical Aspects of String Theory, California, World Scientific (1996) pp 259–284

    work page 1996