arxiv: 2604.07023 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-08 · 💻 cs.CL

Recognition: no theorem link

MARS: Enabling Autoregressive Models Multi-Token Generation

Ziqi Jin , Lei Wang , Ziwei Luo , Aixin Sun

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 17:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CL

keywords autoregressive modelsmulti-token generationinference accelerationfine-tuninglanguage modelsKV cachingspeculative decoding

0 comments

The pith

MARS fine-tunes autoregressive models to predict multiple tokens per forward pass without architectural changes or accuracy loss.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Autoregressive language models normally generate text one token at a time even when several following tokens are predictable from context. MARS is a continued training procedure on existing instruction data that teaches the model to output multiple tokens accurately in one pass. The resulting model requires no extra parameters or modifications, so it can still be called exactly like the original for single-token generation at full quality. Readers would care because it delivers 1.5-1.7x throughput when multi-token steps are accepted, plus up to 1.71x wall-clock speedup in batch inference via block-level KV caching. It also supports on-the-fly speed adjustment through confidence thresholding without swapping models.

Core claim

MARS (Mask AutoRegreSsion) is a lightweight fine-tuning method that trains an instruction-tuned autoregressive model to predict multiple consecutive tokens in a single forward pass. It adds no architectural modifications and no extra parameters, yielding a single model that matches or exceeds the original AR baseline on six standard benchmarks when generating one token per step. When allowed to accept multiple tokens per step, it maintains baseline accuracy while achieving 1.5-1.7x throughput. A block-level KV caching strategy further enables up to 1.71x wall-clock speedup over standard AR with KV cache on models such as Qwen2.5-7B, and confidence thresholding permits real-time throughput/质量

What carries the argument

MARS fine-tuning on existing instruction data, which teaches multi-token prediction while preserving single-token behavior.

Load-bearing premise

Continued training on existing instruction data suffices to teach accurate multi-token prediction without degrading single-token performance or introducing new failure modes.

What would settle it

Evaluating the MARS-tuned model on the six standard benchmarks in multi-token mode and observing accuracy below the single-token baseline or emergence of new error patterns such as increased repetition.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.07023 by Aixin Sun, Lei Wang, Ziqi Jin, Ziwei Luo.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: MARS attention mask and inference for L=8, B=4. Left: training mask with [x | x˜] concatenation. The orange cells show that noisy positions attend to each other causally within each block, in contrast to Block Diffusion [Arriola et al., 2025] which uses bidirectional attention within blocks. Right: sliding-window inference. The dashed line marks the generation cursor; B [MASK] tokens are appended and fille… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Speed–quality Pareto curves on GSM8K (left) and HumanEval (right). Solid lines: MARS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Speed–quality trade-off under three acceptance metrics (MARS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Autoregressive (AR) language models generate text one token at a time, even when consecutive tokens are highly predictable given earlier context. We introduce MARS (Mask AutoRegreSsion), a lightweight fine-tuning method that teaches an instruction-tuned AR model to predict multiple tokens per forward pass. MARS adds no architectural modifications, no extra parameters, and produces a single model that can still be called exactly like the original AR model with no performance degradation. Unlike speculative decoding, which maintains a separate draft model alongside the target, or multi-head approaches such as Medusa, which attach additional prediction heads, MARS requires only continued training on existing instruction data. When generating one token per forward pass, MARS matches or exceeds the AR baseline on six standard benchmarks. When allowed to accept multiple tokens per step, it maintains baseline-level accuracy while achieving 1.5-1.7x throughput. We further develop a block-level KV caching strategy for batch inference, achieving up to 1.71x wall-clock speedup over AR with KV cache on Qwen2.5-7B. Finally, MARS supports real-time speed adjustment via confidence thresholding: under high request load, the serving system can increase throughput on the fly without swapping models or restarting, providing a practical latency-quality knob for deployment.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

MARS gets multi-token generation from a plain AR model via continued fine-tuning on instruction data, with no added heads or parameters and claimed no accuracy loss, but the details on the training objective and ablations are still missing.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that this paper shows you can teach an instruction-tuned autoregressive model to output several tokens per forward pass just by doing more training on the same kind of data it already saw, without touching the architecture or adding anything at inference time. It also includes a block KV cache for batches and a simple confidence threshold to dial speed up or down on the fly during serving. That combination is distinct from speculative decoding or Medusa-style heads, and the reported 1.5-1.7x throughput with matching baseline accuracy on six benchmarks plus wall-clock gains on Qwen2.5-7B would be useful if it holds up in practice.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces MARS (Mask AutoRegreSsion), a lightweight fine-tuning approach that enables an instruction-tuned autoregressive language model to predict and accept multiple consecutive tokens in a single forward pass. It claims no architectural changes, no added parameters, no degradation in single-token generation performance relative to the original AR baseline, and 1.5-1.7x throughput gains on six benchmarks when multi-token acceptance is enabled, plus up to 1.71x wall-clock speedup via block-level KV caching on Qwen2.5-7B and dynamic confidence-threshold adjustment for serving.

Significance. If the empirical claims hold under rigorous verification, MARS would offer a simple, parameter-free way to accelerate AR inference using only continued training on existing instruction data, avoiding the overhead of separate draft models (speculative decoding) or extra heads (Medusa). The dynamic thresholding and block KV cache could provide practical deployment benefits for latency-quality trade-offs in high-load serving scenarios.

major comments (3)

[§3, §4] §3 (Method) and §4 (Training): The central claim that continued training on existing instruction data suffices to teach accurate multi-token prediction without degrading single-token accuracy rests on an unstated loss formulation and training objective. Without an explicit equation or pseudocode showing how the multi-token targets are constructed and whether any auxiliary loss or masking is applied, it is impossible to determine whether preservation of single-token performance is by design or merely observed in the reported runs.
[Table 2, §5.1] Table 2 and §5.1 (Benchmark results): The abstract and results claim 'matching or exceeding' baseline accuracy on six benchmarks for single-token mode and 'maintained baseline-level accuracy' for multi-token mode, yet no standard deviations, number of evaluation runs, or statistical tests are reported. This makes it impossible to assess whether observed differences are within noise or whether the 'no degradation' claim is load-bearing.
[§5.2] §5.2 (Block-level KV caching): The reported 1.71x wall-clock speedup on Qwen2.5-7B is attributed to the combination of multi-token generation and the new caching strategy, but no ablation isolating the caching contribution (or comparing against standard KV cache with multi-token acceptance) is provided. This leaves unclear how much of the speedup is due to the core MARS mechanism versus the caching implementation.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract, §1] The abstract and introduction repeatedly state 'no performance degradation' for single-token mode; a brief quantitative comparison (e.g., exact delta on each benchmark) in the main text would strengthen this claim.
[Figures 3-4] Figure captions and axis labels for throughput vs. acceptance-rate curves should explicitly note the confidence threshold values used and whether the curves are averaged over multiple seeds.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to improve clarity and completeness.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§3, §4] §3 (Method) and §4 (Training): The central claim that continued training on existing instruction data suffices to teach accurate multi-token prediction without degrading single-token accuracy rests on an unstated loss formulation and training objective. Without an explicit equation or pseudocode showing how the multi-token targets are constructed and whether any auxiliary loss or masking is applied, it is impossible to determine whether preservation of single-token performance is by design or merely observed in the reported runs.

Authors: We agree the loss details were insufficiently explicit. MARS uses the standard autoregressive cross-entropy loss applied across the multi-token predictions. Targets are formed by shifting the ground-truth sequence forward by the prediction horizon, with a causal mask ensuring only valid future tokens contribute to the loss; no auxiliary objectives or extra heads are used. This formulation preserves single-token behavior by design, as the model remains a standard AR predictor when called with horizon=1. We will add the loss equation and training pseudocode to revised §3 and §4. revision: yes
Referee: [Table 2, §5.1] Table 2 and §5.1 (Benchmark results): The abstract and results claim 'matching or exceeding' baseline accuracy on six benchmarks for single-token mode and 'maintained baseline-level accuracy' for multi-token mode, yet no standard deviations, number of evaluation runs, or statistical tests are reported. This makes it impossible to assess whether observed differences are within noise or whether the 'no degradation' claim is load-bearing.

Authors: We acknowledge the absence of statistical reporting. Results in Table 2 derive from single evaluation runs owing to compute limits on the six benchmarks. We will add standard deviations computed over three random seeds for the primary benchmarks, report the exact number of evaluation runs, and include a brief discussion of observed variance in §5.1 to substantiate the no-degradation claim. revision: partial
Referee: [§5.2] §5.2 (Block-level KV caching): The reported 1.71x wall-clock speedup on Qwen2.5-7B is attributed to the combination of multi-token generation and the new caching strategy, but no ablation isolating the caching contribution (or comparing against standard KV cache with multi-token acceptance) is provided. This leaves unclear how much of the speedup is due to the core MARS mechanism versus the caching implementation.

Authors: We agree an ablation is warranted. The block-level KV cache pre-allocates fixed-size blocks to accommodate variable accepted-token counts in batched inference. We will add a new ablation table in §5.2 that compares (i) MARS multi-token generation with standard per-token KV cache updates against (ii) the block-level strategy, thereby isolating the incremental benefit of the caching implementation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely empirical fine-tuning method with experimental validation

full rationale

The paper introduces MARS as a continued-training procedure on existing instruction data to enable multi-token prediction in unmodified AR models. All central claims (no architectural changes, no extra parameters, preserved single-token performance, 1.5-1.7x throughput with maintained accuracy) are presented as direct experimental measurements on six benchmarks and wall-clock timings. No equations, derivations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are invoked to reduce any reported result to its inputs by construction. The method is self-contained against external benchmarks and does not rely on any of the enumerated circular patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption that an instruction-tuned autoregressive model possesses sufficient capacity to learn accurate multi-token prediction through continued training on the same data distribution without side effects on single-token behavior.

free parameters (1)

confidence threshold
Controls real-time acceptance of multiple tokens; value is chosen to trade speed against quality and is not derived from first principles.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Instruction-tuned autoregressive models can be fine-tuned to predict multiple consecutive tokens accurately via continued training on existing instruction data.
This assumption is required for the method to achieve multi-token generation without architectural changes or accuracy loss.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5533 in / 1408 out tokens · 41677 ms · 2026-05-10T17:50:44.354036+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

18 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages · 12 internal anchors

[1]

Accelerating Large Language Model Decoding with Speculative Sampling

Charlie Chen, Sebastian Borgeaud, Geoffrey Irving, Jean-Baptiste Lespiau, Laurent Sifre, and John Jumper. Accelerating large language model decoding with speculative sampling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.01318,

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[2]

Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code

Mark Chen, Jerry Tworek, Heewoo Jun, Qiming Yuan, Henrique Ponde De Oliveira Pinto, Jared Kaplan, Harri Edwards, Yuri Burda, Nicholas Joseph, Greg Brockman, et al. Evaluating large language models trained on code.arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.03374,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[3]

Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems

Karl Cobbe, Vineet Kosaraju, Mohammad Bavarian, Mark Chen, Heewoo Jun, Lukasz Kaiser, Matthias Plappert, Jerry Tworek, Jacob Hilton, Reiichiro Nakano, et al. Training verifiers to solve math word problems.arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.14168,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[4]

Du et al

Tianqi Du, Lizhe Fang, Weijie Yang, Chenheng Zhang, Zeming Wei, Yifei Wang, and Yisen Wang. Autoregressive models rival diffusion models at any-order generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.13228,

work page arXiv
[5]

Efficient-DLM: From Autoregressive to Diffusion Language Models, and Beyond in Speed

Yonggan Fu, Lexington Whalen, Zhifan Ye, Xin Dong, Shizhe Diao, Jingyu Liu, Chengyue Wu, Hao Zhang, Enze Xie, Song Han, et al. Efficient-dlm: From autoregressive to diffusion language models, and beyond in speed.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.14067,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[6]

Self speculative decoding for diffusion large language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.04147,

Yifeng Gao, Ziang Ji, Yuxuan Wang, Biqing Qi, Hanlin Xu, and Linfeng Zhang. Self speculative decoding for diffusion large language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.04147,

work page arXiv
[7]

Mask-predict: Parallel decoding of conditional masked language models

Marjan Ghazvininejad, Omer Levy, Yinhan Liu, and Luke Zettlemoyer. Mask-predict: Parallel decoding of conditional masked language models. InProceedings of the 2019 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing and the 9th international joint conference on natural language processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), pages 6112–6121,

2019
[8]

Auto-regressive masked diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.16971,

Mahdi Karami and Ali Ghodsi. Auto-regressive masked diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.16971,

work page arXiv
[9]

DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report

Aixin Liu, Bei Feng, Bing Xue, Bingxuan Wang, Bochao Wu, Chengda Lu, Chenggang Zhao, Chengqi Deng, Chenyu Zhang, Chong Ruan, et al. Deepseek-v3 technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.19437,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[10]

URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2512.13961. Qwen, :, An Yang, Baosong Yang, Beichen Zhang, Binyuan Hui, Bo Zheng, Bowen Yu, Chengyuan Li, Dayiheng Liu, Fei Huang, Haoran Wei, Huan Lin, Jian Yang, Jianhong Tu, Jianwei Zhang, Jianxin Yang, Jiaxi Yang, Jingren Zhou, Junyang Lin, Kai Dang, Keming Lu, Keqin Bao, Kexin Yang, Le Yu, Mei Li, Mingfeng Xue, Pei Zhang, Qin...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[11]

Qwen2.5 Technical Report

URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.15115. David Rein, Betty Li Hou, Asa Cooper Stickland, Jackson Petty, Richard Yuanzhe Pang, Julien Dirani, Julian Michael, and Samuel R. Bowman. Gpqa: A graduate-level google-proof q&a benchmark,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[12]

GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmark

URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2311.12022. Junhao Ruan, Bei Li, Yongjing Yin, Pengcheng Huang, Xin Chen, Jingang Wang, Xunliang Cai, Tong Xiao, and JingBo Zhu. Causal autoregressive diffusion language model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.22031,

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[13]

Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Them

URL https://arxiv.org/ abs/2210.09261. Yao Teng, Han Shi, Xian Liu, Xuefei Ning, Guohao Dai, Yu Wang, Zhenguo Li, and Xihui Liu. Ac- celerating auto-regressive text-to-image generation with training-free speculative jacobi decoding. InThe Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations,

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[14]

MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmark

URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2406.01574. Chengyue Wu, Hao Zhang, Shuchen Xue, Zhijian Liu, Shizhe Diao, Ligeng Zhu, Ping Luo, Song Han, and Enze Xie. Fast-dllm: Training-free acceleration of diffusion llm by enabling kv cache and parallel decoding.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.22618,

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[15]

Dream 7B: Diffusion Large Language Models

Jiacheng Ye, Zhihui Xie, Lin Zheng, Jiahui Gao, Zirui Wu, Xin Jiang, Zhenguo Li, and Lingpeng Kong. Dream 7b: Diffusion large language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.15487,

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[16]

Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Models

Jeffrey Zhou, Tianjian Lu, Swaroop Mishra, Siddhartha Brahma, Sujoy Basu, Yi Luan, Denny Zhou, and Le Hou. Instruction-following evaluation for large language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.07911,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[17]

dllm: Simple diffusion language modeling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.22661,

URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2602.22661. A Training Details Table 6: Training hyperparameters. Both stages (AR SFT → MARS) use identical settings per model size. Effective batch sizes are matched across scales. Hyperparameter 0.5B 7B Base model Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct Training data Dolci-Instruct-SFT (∼2M examples) Optimizer AdamW Learning r...

work page arXiv
[18]

This incurs additional training cost: for the 0.5B model, AR SFT takes 15 H200-hours while MARS takes 33 H200-hours (2.2×); for the 7B model, 100 vs 202 H200-hours (2.0×)

Steps (MARS) 256 (one token per step atτ=1.0) 13 Training cost.MARS training concatenates a clean and noisy copy of each sequence, doubling the effective sequence length. This incurs additional training cost: for the 0.5B model, AR SFT takes 15 H200-hours while MARS takes 33 H200-hours (2.2×); for the 7B model, 100 vs 202 H200-hours (2.0×). Peak GPU memor...

2024