pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.07139 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-08 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Revisiting quadratic band crossing: from interaction-driven instability to intrinsic topology

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 17:56 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords quadratic band crossing pointquantum anomalous Hall effectband inversionspin-orbit couplingtwo-dimensional materialstopological phaseinteraction instability
0
0 comments X

The pith

Band inversion between orbital doublet and isolated orbital generates a QBCP gapped by SOC into a robust topological phase.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper proposes that a particular form of band inversion can overcome the usual problems with quadratic band crossing points in realizing stable quantum anomalous Hall effects. The inversion between a symmetry-protected doublet and an isolated orbital creates a QBCP with opposite curvature. Atomic spin-orbit coupling opens a gap at this point, and the band inversion protects against interaction effects that would otherwise destroy the topology. The authors identify monolayer MNX2 compounds as materials where this happens naturally. This offers a route to QAH states that are less vulnerable to competing orders.

Core claim

Band inversion between a symmetry-protected orbital doublet (e.g., d_xz, d_yz) and an isolated orbital (e.g., d_z^2) generically generates a quadratic band crossing point with opposite curvature. This crossing is directly gapped by intrinsic atomic spin-orbit coupling at the single-particle level, while the band inversion shields the topological gap against interaction-driven instabilities. Monolayer MNX2 compounds are suggested as realizations.

What carries the argument

Band inversion generating QBCP with opposite curvature, gapped by atomic SOC and protected by the inversion itself.

If this is right

  • Robust QAH phases become accessible in correlated 2D materials without external tuning.
  • The proposed MNX2 monolayers provide specific candidates for experimental realization.
  • Competing orders are suppressed by the intrinsic mechanism.
  • Topological gaps arise from single-particle effects enhanced by orbital character.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar orbital inversion mechanisms could apply to other d-orbital systems or different crystal symmetries.
  • ARPES measurements on these monolayers could confirm the band inversion and curvature signs as a test.
  • Extending this to heterostructures might allow engineering of even larger gaps.

Load-bearing premise

The band inversion inherently shields the topological gap against interaction-driven competing orders without needing extra conditions or verification.

What would settle it

Detection of gapless states or competing magnetic/charge orders at the QBCP in MNX2 monolayers despite the presence of the predicted band inversion.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.07139 by Huan Wang, Jing Wang, Linghao Huang, Yadong Jiang, Zhaochen Liu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic illustration of band inversion generating a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Interaction effects and phase stability in the tetrago [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Interaction effects and phase stability in the trigonal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Atomic structure of monolayer [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The realization of robust quantum anomalous Hall (QAH) phases at elevated temperatures remains a central challenge in condensed matter physics. While quadratic band crossing points (QBCP) provide a promising route towards QAH states, existing proposals are largely confined to idealized models or hindered by interaction-driven competing orders. Here, we demonstrate that these limitations are not intrinsic to QBCP but arise from their specific implementation. We propose a general mechanism where band inversion between a symmetry-protected orbital doublet (e.g. $d_{xz},d_{yz}$) and an isolated orbital (e.g. $d_{z^2}$)-generically generates a QBCP with opposite curvature. This crossing is directly gapped at the single-particle level by intrinsic atomic spin-orbit coupling, while the underlying band inversion naturally shields the resulting topological gap against other interaction-driven instabilities. We further suggest monolayer compounds $MNX_2$ ($M$= Ni, Pd, Pt; $N$= Nb, Ta; $X$= S, Se, Te) as a realistic material class that intrinsically realizes this mechanism. These findings provide a concrete pathway toward robust QAH phases in correlated materials.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that band inversion between a symmetry-protected orbital doublet (e.g., d_xz, d_yz) and an isolated orbital (e.g., d_z^2) generically produces a quadratic band crossing point (QBCP) with opposite curvatures. This QBCP is gapped at the single-particle level by intrinsic atomic spin-orbit coupling (SOC), and the underlying band inversion is argued to shield the resulting topological gap against competing interaction-driven instabilities such as CDW or SDW. Monolayer MNX2 compounds (M=Ni,Pd,Pt; N=Nb,Ta; X=S,Se,Te) are proposed as realistic realizations, offering a route to robust quantum anomalous Hall phases.

Significance. If the shielding mechanism is confirmed, the work provides a symmetry-based pathway to interaction-robust QAH states in correlated 2D materials, extending beyond idealized lattice models. The concrete material suggestions enable direct experimental tests via ARPES and transport, potentially advancing high-temperature topological phases.

major comments (3)
  1. [Mechanism and material proposal sections] The central shielding claim (abstract; mechanism discussion) asserts that band inversion inherently protects the SOC gap against interaction instabilities without additional tuning, but no explicit many-body calculations (RPA, DMFT, or Hubbard-U scans) are presented to compare the SOC gap scale against critical interaction strengths for CDW/SDW/nematic orders in MNX2.
  2. [Effective model / symmetry analysis] The generic generation of opposite-curvature QBCP via orbital band inversion relies on symmetry-based effective models; the derivation (likely in the model section) must explicitly demonstrate the curvature signs and show that the result holds independently of microscopic parameters rather than by construction of the low-energy Hamiltonian.
  3. [DFT results and material discussion] For the MNX2 candidates, the orbital character assignments (doublet vs. isolated d_z^2) and confirmation of the QBCP are presumably supported by DFT bands, but these must be quantitatively linked to the shielding argument; single-particle topology alone does not establish robustness without interaction energy-scale comparisons.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Notation and figures] Clarify notation for orbital indices (e.g., consistent use of subscripts in d_{xz} throughout text and figures).
  2. [Figures] Band-structure figures for MNX2 should include orbital projections or fat-band representations to directly illustrate the inversion and QBCP formation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript. We have addressed each of the major comments below, revising the text to improve clarity and strengthen the presentation of our arguments where possible. Our responses focus on the symmetry-based mechanism and material proposal while acknowledging the scope limitations of the current work.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Mechanism and material proposal sections] The central shielding claim (abstract; mechanism discussion) asserts that band inversion inherently protects the SOC gap against interaction instabilities without additional tuning, but no explicit many-body calculations (RPA, DMFT, or Hubbard-U scans) are presented to compare the SOC gap scale against critical interaction strengths for CDW/SDW/nematic orders in MNX2.

    Authors: We agree that explicit many-body calculations would provide a more quantitative validation of the shielding effect. Our central claim is symmetry-based: the band inversion between the orbital doublet and isolated orbital enforces opposite curvatures at the QBCP, which in turn stabilizes the SOC-induced gap against instabilities that would otherwise gap or reconstruct the crossing in non-inverted cases. To address the comment, we have added a new paragraph in the mechanism section with order-of-magnitude estimates. These compare the DFT-computed SOC gap (~10-30 meV in the MNX2 family) against literature values for critical interaction strengths in related transition-metal compounds (e.g., from RPA studies on similar d-electron systems). Full RPA or DMFT scans for the specific MNX2 monolayers remain computationally demanding and are noted as an important direction for follow-up work. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Effective model / symmetry analysis] The generic generation of opposite-curvature QBCP via orbital band inversion relies on symmetry-based effective models; the derivation (likely in the model section) must explicitly demonstrate the curvature signs and show that the result holds independently of microscopic parameters rather than by construction of the low-energy Hamiltonian.

    Authors: We have revised the effective-model section to make the derivation fully explicit. We start from the symmetry-allowed k·p Hamiltonian for the orbital doublet (transforming as E representation) coupled to the isolated orbital, expand to quadratic order, and compute the eigenvalues analytically. The opposite curvature signs emerge directly from the band-inversion condition (negative mass term for the doublet relative to the isolated orbital) and are independent of the specific values of the microscopic hopping parameters provided the inversion is maintained. We now include a short parameter scan in the supplementary material confirming robustness across a range of realistic values. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [DFT results and material discussion] For the MNX2 candidates, the orbital character assignments (doublet vs. isolated d_z^2) and confirmation of the QBCP are presumably supported by DFT bands, but these must be quantitatively linked to the shielding argument; single-particle topology alone does not establish robustness without interaction energy-scale comparisons.

    Authors: We have expanded the material-discussion section to provide this quantitative link. Projected DFT bands explicitly confirm the orbital characters (doublet vs. d_z^2) and the presence of the QBCP at the Fermi level. We now tabulate the computed SOC gap sizes for each MNX2 compound and compare them directly to estimated interaction scales derived from the DFT bandwidths and known Hubbard U values for Ni/Pd/Pt d-orbitals in similar layered compounds. This establishes that the SOC gap lies in a regime where the inversion-protected topology is expected to remain stable, consistent with the symmetry argument. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation rests on symmetry arguments and general band-inversion mechanism without self-referential reduction

full rationale

The paper's central claim—that band inversion between a symmetry-protected orbital doublet and an isolated orbital produces an opposite-curvature QBCP gapped by atomic SOC and naturally shielded against interaction instabilities—is presented as a general symmetry-based mechanism, not derived from fitted parameters, self-citations, or ansatzes that loop back to the result. No equations reduce the shielding or topology to the input assumptions by construction, and the MNX2 material class is suggested as a realization rather than used to define the mechanism. The derivation chain is self-contained against external symmetry principles and single-particle topology, with no load-bearing self-citation or renaming of known results.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The proposal rests on standard assumptions of single-particle band theory and orbital symmetry in transition metal compounds, with no free parameters or invented entities introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Single-particle band theory with orbital characters determines curvature signs at crossings
    Invoked when stating that band inversion generically generates QBCP with opposite curvature
  • domain assumption Intrinsic atomic SOC gaps the crossing without external fields
    Stated as direct gapping at single-particle level

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5513 in / 1448 out tokens · 45665 ms · 2026-05-10T17:56:18.994751+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Chang, C.-X

    C.-Z. Chang, C.-X. Liu, and A. H. MacDonald, Collo- quium: Quantum anomalous hall effect, Rev. Mod. Phys. 95, 011002 (2023)

  2. [2]

    Tokura, K

    Y. Tokura, K. Yasuda, and A. Tsukazaki, Magnetic topo- logical insulators, Nat. Rev. Phys.1, 126 (2019)

  3. [3]

    Wang and S.-C

    J. Wang and S.-C. Zhang, Topological states of con- densed matter, Nat. Mater.16, 1062 (2017)

  4. [4]

    D. J. Thouless, M. Kohmoto, M. P. Nightingale, and M. den Nijs, Quantized hall conductance in a two- dimensional periodic potential, Phys. Rev. Lett.49, 405 (1982)

  5. [5]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Model for a quantum hall effect with- out landau levels: Condensed-matter realization of the ”parity anomaly”, Phys. Rev. Lett.61, 2015 (1988)

  6. [6]

    B. I. Halperin, Quantized hall conductance, current- carrying edge states, and the existence of extended states in a two-dimensional disordered potential, Phys. Rev. B 25, 2185 (1982)

  7. [7]

    Zhang and S.-C

    X. Zhang and S.-C. Zhang, Chiral interconnects based on topological insulators, Proc. SPIE Micro- Nanotechnol. Sens. Syst. Appl. IV8373, 837309 (2012)

  8. [8]

    J. Wang, B. Lian, H. Zhang, Y. Xu, and S.-C. Zhang, Quantum anomalous hall effect with higher plateaus, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 136801 (2013)

  9. [9]

    Okazaki, T

    Y. Okazaki, T. Oe, M. Kawamura, R. Yoshimi, S. Nakamura, S. Takada, M. Mogi, K. S. Takahashi, A. Tsukazaki, M. Kawasaki, Y. Tokura, and N.-H. Kaneko, Quantum anomalous hall effect with a perma- nent magnet defines a quantum resistance standard, Nat. Phys.18, 25 (2022)

  10. [10]

    Patel, K

    D. Patel, K. Fijalkowski, M. Kruskopf, N. Liu, M. G¨ otz, E. Pesel, M. Jaime, M. Klement, S. Schreyeck, K. Brun- ner,et al., A zero external magnetic field quantum stan- dard of resistance at the 10 −9 level, Nat. Electron.7, 1111 (2024)

  11. [11]

    N. J. Hu´ ang, J. L. Boland, K. M. Fijalkowski, C. Gould, T. Hesjedal, O. Kazakova, S. Kumar, and H. Scherer, Quantum anomalous hall effect for metrology, Appl. Phys. Lett.126, 040501 (2025)

  12. [12]

    Chang, J

    C.-Z. Chang, J. Zhang, X. Feng, J. Shen, Z. Zhang, M. Guo, K. Li, Y. Ou, P. Wei, L.-L. Wang, Z.-Q. Ji, Y. Feng, S. Ji, X. Chen, J. Jia, X. Dai, Z. Fang, S.-C. Zhang, K. He, Y. Wang, L. Lu, X.-C. Ma, and Q.-K. Xue, Experimental Observation of the Quantum Anomalous Hall Effect in a Magnetic Topological Insulator, Science 340, 167 (2013)

  13. [13]

    Chang, W

    C.-Z. Chang, W. Zhao, D. Y. Kim, H. Zhang, B. A. As- saf, D. Heiman, S.-C. Zhang, C. Liu, M. H. W. Chan, and J. S. Moodera, High-precision realization of robust quantum anomalous hall state in a hard ferromagnetic topological insulator, Nat. Mater.14, 473 (2015)

  14. [14]

    M. Mogi, R. Yoshimi, A. Tsukazaki, K. Yasuda, Y. Kozuka, K. S. Takahashi, M. Kawasaki, and Y. Tokura, Magnetic modulation doping in topological insulators toward higher-temperature quantum anoma- lous hall effect, Appl. Phys. Lett.107, 182401 (2015)

  15. [15]

    A. J. Bestwick, E. J. Fox, X. Kou, L. Pan, K. L. Wang, and D. Goldhaber-Gordon, Precise quantization of the anomalous hall effect near zero magnetic field, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 187201 (2015)

  16. [16]

    Watanabe, R

    R. Watanabe, R. Yoshimi, M. Kawamura, M. Mogi, A. Tsukazaki, X. Z. Yu, K. Nakajima, K. S. Taka- hashi, M. Kawasaki, and Y. Tokura, Quantum anoma- lous hall effect driven by magnetic proximity coupling in all-telluride based heterostructure, Appl. Phys. Lett. 115, 102403 (2019)

  17. [17]

    Y. Deng, Y. Yu, M. Z. Shi, Z. Guo, Z. Xu, J. Wang, X. H. Chen, and Y. Zhang, Quantum anomalous hall ef- fect in intrinsic magnetic topological insulator mnbi2te4, Science367, 895 (2020)

  18. [18]

    Y. Li, Y. Bai, Y. Feng, J. Luan, Z. Gao, Y. Chen, Y. Tong, R. Liu, S. K. Chong, K. L. Wang,et al., Reentrant quantum anomalous hall effect in molecu- lar beam epitaxy-grown mnbi2te4 thin films (2024), arXiv:2401.11450 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

  19. [19]

    Z. Lian, Y. Wang, Y. Wang, W.-H. Dong, Y. Feng, Z. Dong, M. Ma, S. Yang, L. Xu, Y. Li,et al., Anti- 6 ferromagnetic quantum anomalous hall effect under spin flips and flops, Nature641, 70 (2025)

  20. [20]

    Serlin, C

    M. Serlin, C. L. Tschirhart, H. Polshyn, Y. Zhang, J. Zhu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Balents, and A. F. Young, Intrinsic quantized anomalous hall effect in a moir´ e het- erostructure, Science367, 900 (2020)

  21. [21]

    T. Li, S. Jiang, B. Shen, Y. Zhang, L. Li, Z. Tao, T. De- vakul, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Fu, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Quantum anomalous hall effect from inter- twined moir´ e bands, Nature600, 641 (2021)

  22. [22]

    H. Park, J. Cai, E. Anderson, Y. Zhang, J. Zhu, X. Liu, C. Wang, W. Holtzmann, C. Hu, Z. Liu,et al., Observa- tion of fractionally quantized anomalous hall effect, Na- ture622, 74 (2023)

  23. [23]

    F. Xu, Z. Sun, T. Jia, C. Liu, C. Xu, C. Li, Y. Gu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, B. Tong,et al., Observa- tion of integer and fractional quantum anomalous hall effects in twisted bilayer MoTe2, Phys. Rev. X13, 031037 (2023)

  24. [24]

    Z. Lu, T. Han, Y. Yao, A. P. Reddy, J. Yang, J. Seo, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Fu, and L. Ju, Fractional quantum anomalous hall effect in multilayer graphene, Nature626, 759 (2024)

  25. [25]

    T. Han, Z. Lu, Y. Yao, J. Yang, J. Seo, C. Yoon, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Fu, F. Zhang, and L. Ju, Large quantum anomalous hall effect in spin-orbit proximitized rhombohedral graphene, Science384, 647 (2024)

  26. [26]

    Y. Sha, J. Zheng, K. Liu, H. Du, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Jia, Z. Shi, R. Zhong, and G. Chen, Observation of a chern insulator in crystalline abca- tetralayer graphene with spin-orbit coupling, Science 384, 414 (2024)

  27. [27]

    A. Uday, G. Lippertz, K. Moors, H. F. Legg, R. Joris, A. Bliesener, L. M. C. Pereira, A. A. Taskin, and Y. Ando, Induced superconducting correlations in a quantum anomalous hall insulator, Nat. Phys.20, 1589 (2024)

  28. [28]

    R. Yu, W. Zhang, H.-J. Zhang, S.-C. Zhang, X. Dai, and Z. Fang, Quantized Anomalous Hall Effect in Magnetic Topological Insulators, Science329, 61 (2010)

  29. [29]

    Zhang, M

    D. Zhang, M. Shi, T. Zhu, D. Xing, H. Zhang, and J. Wang, Topological axion states in the magnetic insu- lator mnbi2te4 with the quantized magnetoelectric effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 206401 (2019)

  30. [30]

    J. Li, Y. Li, S. Du, Z. Wang, B.-L. Gu, S.-C. Zhang, K. He, W. Duan, and Y. Xu, Intrinsic magnetic topolog- ical insulators in van der waals layered mnbi2te4-family materials, Sci. Adv.5, eaaw5685 (2019)

  31. [31]

    M. M. Otrokov, I. P. Rusinov, M. Blanco-Rey, M. Hoff- mann, A. Y. Vyazovskaya, S. V. Eremeev, A. Ernst, P. M. Echenique, A. Arnau, and E. V. Chulkov, Unique thickness-dependent properties of the van der waals in- terlayer antiferromagnet mnbi2te4 films, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 107202 (2019)

  32. [32]

    Y. X. Chong, X. Liu, R. Sharma, A. Kostin, G. Gu, K. Fujita, J. C. S. Davis, and P. O. Sprau, Severe dirac mass gap suppression in sb2te3-based quantum anoma- lous hall materials, Nano Lett.20, 8001 (2020)

  33. [33]

    Garnica, M

    M. Garnica, M. M. Otrokov, P. C. Aguilar, I. I. Klimovskikh, D. Estyunin, Z. S. Aliev, I. R. Ami- raslanov, N. A. Abdullayev, V. N. Zverev, M. B. Ba- banly, N. T. Mamedov, A. M. Shikin, A. Arnau, A. L. V. de Parga, E. V. Chulkov, and R. Miranda, Native point defects and their implications for the dirac point gap at mnbi2te4(0001), npj Quantum Mater.7, 7 (2022)

  34. [34]

    J.-Y. You, Z. Zhang, B. Gu, and G. Su, Two-dimensional room-temperature ferromagnetic semiconductors with quantum anomalous hall effect, Phys. Rev. Applied12, 024063 (2019)

  35. [35]

    J. Sun, X. Zhong, W. Cui, J. Shi, J. Hao, M. Xu, and Y. Li, The intrinsic magnetism, quantum anomalous hall effect and curie temperature in 2d transition metal tri- halides, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.22, 2429 (2020)

  36. [36]

    Y. Li, J. Li, Y. Li, M. Ye, F. Zheng, Z. Zhang, J. Fu, W. Duan, and Y. Xu, High-temperature quan- tum anomalous hall insulators in lithium-decorated iron- based superconductor materials, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 086401 (2020)

  37. [37]

    Q. Sui, J. Zhang, S. Jin, Y. Xia, and G. Li, Model hamil- tonian for the quantum anomalous hall state in iron- halogenide, Chin. Phys. Lett.37, 097301 (2020)

  38. [38]

    Q. Sun, Y. Ma, and N. Kioussis, Two-dimensional dirac spin-gapless semiconductors with tunable perpendicular magnetic anisotropy and a robust quantum anomalous hall effect, Mater. Horiz.7, 2071 (2020)

  39. [39]

    Z. Li, Y. Han, and Z. Qiao, Chern number tunable quantum anomalous hall effect in monolayer transitional metal oxides via manipulating magnetization orientation, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 036801 (2022)

  40. [40]

    X. Xuan, Z. Zhang, C. Chen, and W. Guo, Robust quan- tum anomalous hall states in monolayer and few-layer tite, Nano Lett.22, 5379 (2022)

  41. [42]

    Jiang, H

    Y. Jiang, H. Wang, K. Bao, Z. Liu, and J. Wang, Mono- layer V2M X4: A new family of quantum anomalous hall insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 106602 (2024)

  42. [43]

    Q. Yao, Y. Xue, B. Zhao, Y. Zhu, Z. Li, and Z. Yang, Orbital-selectivity-induced robust quantum anomalous hall effect in hund’s metals mgfep, Nano Lett.24, 1563 (2024)

  43. [44]

    Jiang, H

    Y. Jiang, H. Wang, and J. Wang, FeTaX 2: A ferrimag- netic quantum anomalous hall insulator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 036601 (2026)

  44. [45]

    K. Sun, H. Yao, E. Fradkin, and S. A. Kivelson, Topo- logical insulators and nematic phases from spontaneous symmetry breaking in 2d fermi systems with a quadratic band crossing, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 046811 (2009)

  45. [46]

    Wu, Y.-Y

    H.-Q. Wu, Y.-Y. He, C. Fang, Z. Y. Meng, and Z.-Y. Lu, Diagnosis of interaction-driven topological phase via ex- act diagonalization, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 066403 (2016)

  46. [47]

    T.-S. Zeng, W. Zhu, and D. Sheng, Tuning topological phase and quantum anomalous hall effect by interac- tion in quadratic band touching systems, npj Quantum Mater.3, 49 (2018)

  47. [48]

    Liang, J

    Q.-F. Liang, J. Zhou, R. Yu, X. Wang, and H. Weng, Interaction-driven quantum anomalous hall effect in halo- genated hematite nanosheets, Phys. Rev. B96, 205412 (2017)

  48. [49]

    Rachel, Interacting topological insulators: a review, Rep

    S. Rachel, Interacting topological insulators: a review, Rep. Prog. Phys.81, 116501 (2018)

  49. [50]

    Sur, S.-S

    S. Sur, S.-S. Gong, K. Yang, and O. Vafek, Quantum anomalous hall insulator stabilized by competing inter- actions, Phys. Rev. B98, 125144 (2018)

  50. [51]

    J. M. Murray and O. Vafek, Renormalization group study of interaction-driven quantum anomalous hall and quan- 7 tum spin hall phases in quadratic band crossing systems, Phys. Rev. B89, 201110 (2014)

  51. [52]

    W.-F. Tsai, C. Fang, H. Yao, and J. Hu, Interaction- driven topological and nematic phases on the lieb lattice, New Journal of Physics17, 055016 (2015)

  52. [53]

    Z. H. Liu, H. Lu, Z. Y. Meng, and L. Janssen, Interaction- induced nematic dirac semimetal from quadratic band touching: A constrained-path quantum monte carlo study (2025), arXiv:2507.15668 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

  53. [54]

    X. Ji, J. Gao, C. Yue, Z. Wang, H. Wu, X. Dai, and H. Weng, Interaction-driven topological phase transition in monolayer crcl2(pyrazine)2, Phys. Rev. B106, 235103 (2022)

  54. [55]

    D. Wu, Y. Huang, S. Sun, J. Gao, Z. Guo, H. Weng, Z. Fang, K. Jiang, and Z. Wang, Unprotected quadratic band crossing points and quantum anomalous hall effect in feb2 monolayer, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.65, 256811 (2022)

  55. [56]

    McCann and V

    E. McCann and V. I. Fal’ko, Landau-level degeneracy and quantum hall effect in a graphite bilayer, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 086805 (2006)

  56. [57]

    Nilsson, A

    J. Nilsson, A. H. Castro Neto, F. Guinea, and N. M. R. Peres, Electronic properties of bilayer and multilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B78, 045405 (2008)

  57. [58]

    Zhu, S.-S

    W. Zhu, S.-S. Gong, T.-S. Zeng, L. Fu, and D. N. Sheng, Interaction-driven spontaneous quantum hall effect on a kagome lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 096402 (2016)

  58. [59]

    Bolens and N

    A. Bolens and N. Nagaosa, Topological states on the breathing kagome lattice, Phys. Rev. B99, 165141 (2019)

  59. [60]

    See Supplemental Material for methods and technical de- tails

  60. [61]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B54, 11169 (1996)

  61. [62]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

  62. [63]

    S. L. Dudarev, G. A. Botton, S. Y. Savrasov, C. J. Humphreys, and A. P. Sutton, Electron-energy-loss spec- tra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: An lsda+u study, Phys. Rev. B57, 1505 (1998)

  63. [64]

    A. V. Krukau, O. A. Vydrov, A. F. Izmaylov, and G. E. Scuseria, Influence of the exchange screening parame- ter on the performance of screened hybrid functionals, J. Chem. Phys.125, 224106 (2006)

  64. [65]

    Mellaerts, R

    S. Mellaerts, R. Meng, V. Afanasiev, J. W. Seo, M. Houssa, and J.-P. Locquet, Quarter-filled kane-mele hubbard model: Dirac half metals, Phys. Rev. B103, 155159 (2021)

  65. [66]

    Li, Prediction of intrinsic two dimensional ferromag- netism realized quantum anomalous hall effect, Phys

    P. Li, Prediction of intrinsic two dimensional ferromag- netism realized quantum anomalous hall effect, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.21, 6712 (2019)

  66. [67]

    H. Xu, Y. Jiang, H. Wang, and J. Wang, Discovering two- dimensional magnetic topological insulators by machine learning, Phys. Rev. B109, 035122 (2024)