pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.07449 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-08 · ✦ hep-th

Recognition: no theorem link

Quantum Fluctuations and Newton-Cartan Geometry for Non-Relativistic de Sitter space

Matthias Harksen , Diego Hidalgo , Watse Sybesma
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 17:41 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords non-relativistic de Sitter gravitySchwarzian actionquantum fluctuationsNewton-Cartan geometryone-loop partition functionOstrogradsky formalismJT gravitynon-relativistic holography
0
0 comments X

The pith

The one-loop partition function of the non-relativistic Schwarzian action for de Sitter gravity produces a temperature-dependent prefactor scaling as T squared.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies a non-relativistic version of two-dimensional de Sitter gravity in both boundary and bulk formulations. On the boundary it evaluates the one-loop partition function of the associated Schwarzian-type action by deriving the path integral measure directly from the action via the Ostrogradsky formalism rather than coadjoint orbits. This computation yields a prefactor that scales with the square of temperature, and the exponent matches the number of global symmetry generators present in the theory. In the bulk it constructs a torsionless Newton-Cartan geometry that satisfies the equations of motion of a non-relativistic JT-like action and can be lifted to three-dimensional Lorentzian geometry. A reader would care because the result supplies an explicit handle on quantum effects in de Sitter space through a non-relativistic lens and demonstrates a concrete route toward non-relativistic holographic dualities.

Core claim

The central claim is that the one-loop partition function of the non-relativistic Schwarzian boundary action, computed with a path-integral measure obtained from the Ostrogradsky formalism, contains a temperature-dependent prefactor that scales as T squared, with the power agreeing with the counting of the four global symmetry generators, while the corresponding bulk description is a torsionless Newton-Cartan geometry obeying the equations of a non-relativistic JT-like action that uplifts to three-dimensional Lorentzian geometry.

What carries the argument

The Ostrogradsky formalism applied to the higher-derivative Schwarzian action, which supplies the path-integral measure used to extract the one-loop quantum fluctuations and their T squared prefactor.

Load-bearing premise

The Ostrogradsky-derived path-integral measure correctly captures the quantum fluctuations of the non-relativistic Schwarzian action without hidden gauge-fixing or measure anomalies that would alter the T squared scaling.

What would settle it

An independent computation of the same one-loop partition function by the coadjoint-orbit method that yields a temperature power different from two would falsify the central boundary result.

read the original abstract

We study a non-relativistic realisation of two-dimensional de Sitter gravity both from its boundary and bulk description with the goal of learning about de Sitter space and paving the way for extending the holographic duality into a non-relativistic direction. On the boundary side, we analyse the Schwarzian-type boundary action associated with non-relativistic de Sitter gravity and evaluate its one-loop partition function in order to compute its quantum fluctuations. Rather than relying on the coadjoint-orbit construction, we derive the path integral measure directly from the action using the Ostrogradsky formalism. We find a temperature-dependent prefactor scaling as $T^2$, of which the power agrees with the counting of the four global symmetry generators present. On the bulk side, we construct the corresponding torsionless Newton-Cartan geometry and show that it satisfies the equations of motion of a non-relativistic JT-like action and uplift the geometry to a three-dimensional Lorentzian geometry.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies non-relativistic two-dimensional de Sitter gravity from boundary and bulk viewpoints. On the boundary, it examines the Schwarzian-type action and computes its one-loop partition function by deriving the path-integral measure directly from the action via the Ostrogradsky formalism (rather than coadjoint orbits), obtaining a temperature-dependent prefactor scaling as T² whose power matches the four global symmetry generators. On the bulk side, it constructs the corresponding torsionless Newton-Cartan geometry, verifies that it satisfies the equations of motion of a non-relativistic JT-like action, and uplifts the geometry to three-dimensional Lorentzian space.

Significance. If the Ostrogradsky-derived measure is shown to be free of additional Jacobians or anomalies, the work supplies an independent route to the one-loop prefactor in non-relativistic Schwarzian theories and thereby strengthens the foundations for non-relativistic holographic dualities involving de Sitter space. The explicit bulk geometric construction and its consistency with the equations of motion provide a useful cross-check. The agreement between the computed power and the symmetry-generator count is a concrete, falsifiable feature that adds value if the measure derivation is fully controlled.

major comments (1)
  1. [Boundary analysis and one-loop partition function] The central claim that the Ostrogradsky reduction yields a measure whose functional determinant (or zero-mode factors) produces precisely a T² prefactor with no extra T-dependent contributions from auxiliary momenta, gauge redundancies, or regularization artifacts is load-bearing for the reported result. Explicit verification of the phase-space measure, including any Fadeev-Popov or Jacobian factors tied to the four global symmetries, is required before the numerical agreement with generator counting can be regarded as confirmatory.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address the major comment on the boundary analysis below and will revise the manuscript to provide the requested explicit details on the phase-space measure.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim that the Ostrogradsky reduction yields a measure whose functional determinant (or zero-mode factors) produces precisely a T² prefactor with no extra T-dependent contributions from auxiliary momenta, gauge redundancies, or regularization artifacts is load-bearing for the reported result. Explicit verification of the phase-space measure, including any Fadeev-Popov or Jacobian factors tied to the four global symmetries, is required before the numerical agreement with generator counting can be regarded as confirmatory.

    Authors: We agree that making the verification of the phase-space measure fully explicit strengthens the result. In the manuscript we derive the path-integral measure directly from the action via the Ostrogradsky formalism; this procedure reduces the phase space while incorporating the auxiliary momenta and the second-class constraints inherent to the action. The resulting T² prefactor is generated by the four zero modes associated with the global symmetries. To address the concern about possible additional contributions, we will revise the manuscript to include a detailed computation of the full phase-space measure. This will explicitly evaluate the Jacobian arising from the Ostrogradsky coordinate transformation, compute the Fadeev-Popov determinant for the four global symmetries, and demonstrate that regularization artifacts do not introduce further T-dependent factors. We expect this addition to confirm that the prefactor remains precisely T². revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; Ostrogradsky measure derivation is independent

full rationale

The paper derives the path-integral measure for the non-relativistic Schwarzian action directly via the Ostrogradsky formalism applied to the higher-derivative boundary action, explicitly avoiding the coadjoint-orbit construction. The resulting T² prefactor is obtained from this computation and separately noted to agree with the count of four global symmetry generators, but the derivation itself does not reduce to or presuppose that counting. No load-bearing self-citations, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or ansatz smuggling appear in the central chain. The bulk Newton-Cartan geometry construction is a separate analysis and does not feed back into the boundary fluctuation result. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard assumptions of two-dimensional gravity theories plus the specific non-relativistic limit; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The non-relativistic limit of two-dimensional de Sitter gravity admits a well-defined Schwarzian-type boundary action whose higher-derivative terms can be handled by the Ostrogradsky formalism without anomalies.
    Invoked when the boundary action is introduced and the measure is derived.
  • domain assumption A torsionless Newton-Cartan geometry in two dimensions can be uplifted to a three-dimensional Lorentzian geometry while preserving the equations of motion of the non-relativistic JT-like action.
    Stated when the bulk geometry is constructed and verified.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5464 in / 1528 out tokens · 66018 ms · 2026-05-10T17:41:16.688147+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    J. M. Maldacena,The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231–252 [hep-th/9711200]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  2. [2]

    Teitelboim,Gravitation and Hamiltonian Structure in Two Space-Time Dimensions,Phys

    C. Teitelboim,Gravitation and Hamiltonian Structure in Two Space-Time Dimensions,Phys. Lett. B126(1983) 41–45

    1983

  3. [3]

    Jackiw,Lower Dimensional Gravity,Nucl

    R. Jackiw,Lower Dimensional Gravity,Nucl. Phys. B252(1985) 343–356. – 26 –

    1985

  4. [4]

    Gapless Spin-Fluid Ground State in a Random Quantum Heisenberg Magnet

    S. Sachdev and J. Ye,Gapless spin fluid ground state in a random, quantum Heisenberg magnet,Phys. Rev. Lett.70(1993) 3339 [cond-mat/9212030]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1993

  5. [5]

    A simple model of quantum holography

    A. Kitaev, “A simple model of quantum holography.” http://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/entangled15/kitaev/, http://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/entangled15/kitaev2/, 2015. Talks at KITP, April 7, 2015 and May 27, 2015

    2015

  6. [6]

    Sachdev,Holographic Metals and the Fractionalized Fermi Liquid,Physical Review Letters105(2010) 151602 [1006.3794]

    S. Sachdev,Holographic metals and the fractionalized Fermi liquid,Phys. Rev. Lett.105(2010) 151602 [1006.3794]

    work page arXiv 2010

  7. [7]

    Comments on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model

    J. Maldacena and D. Stanford,Remarks on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model,Phys. Rev. D94 (2016), no. 10 106002 [1604.07818]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  8. [8]

    Sárosi,AdS 2 holography and the SYK model,PoSModave2017(2018) 001 [1711.08482]

    G. Sárosi,AdS 2 holography and the SYK model,PoSModave2017(2018) 001 [1711.08482]

    work page arXiv 2018

  9. [9]

    Y. Gu, A. Kitaev, S. Sachdev and G. Tarnopolsky,Notes on the complex Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model,JHEP02(2020) 157 [1910.14099]

    work page arXiv 2020

  10. [10]

    T. G. Mertens,The Schwarzian theory — origins,JHEP05(2018) 036 [1801.09605]

    work page arXiv 2018

  11. [11]

    Dilaton Gravity in Two Dimensions

    D. Grumiller, W. Kummer and D. V. Vassilevich,Dilaton gravity in two-dimensions,Phys. Rept.369327–430 [hep-th/0204253]

    work page Pith review arXiv

  12. [12]

    M. H. Christensen, J. Hartong, N. A. Obers and B. Rollier,Torsional Newton-Cartan Geometry and Lifshitz Holography,Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 061901 [1311.4794]

    work page arXiv 2014

  13. [13]

    Gauging the Carroll Algebra and Ultra-Relativistic Gravity

    J. Hartong,Gauging the Carroll Algebra and Ultra-Relativistic Gravity,JHEP08(2015) 069 [1505.05011]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2015

  14. [14]

    Hansen, J

    D. Hansen, J. Hartong and N. A. Obers,Non-Relativistic Gravity and its Coupling to Matter, JHEP06(2020) 145 [2001.10277]

    work page arXiv 2020

  15. [15]

    Hansen, N

    D. Hansen, N. A. Obers, G. Oling and B. T. Søgaard,Carroll Expansion of General Relativity, SciPost Phys.13(2022), no. 3 055 [2112.12684]

    work page arXiv 2022

  16. [16]

    Bergshoeff, J

    E. Bergshoeff, J. Figueroa-O’Farrill and J. Gomis,A non-lorentzian primer,SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes69(2023) 1 [2206.12177]

    work page arXiv 2023

  17. [17]

    Nonrelativistic closed string theory,

    J. Gomis and H. Ooguri,Nonrelativistic closed string theory,J. Math. Phys.42(2001) 3127–3151 [hep-th/0009181]

    work page arXiv 2001

  18. [18]

    U. H. Danielsson, A. Guijosa and M. Kruczenski,IIA/B, wound and wrapped,JHEP10(2000) 020 [hep-th/0009182]

    work page arXiv 2000

  19. [19]

    Dynamics of Carroll Strings,

    B. Cardona, J. Gomis and J. M. Pons,Dynamics of Carroll Strings,JHEP07(2016) 050 [1605.05483]

    work page arXiv 2016

  20. [20]

    Bidussi, T

    L. Bidussi, T. Harmark, J. Hartong, N. A. Obers and G. Oling,Torsional string Newton-Cartan geometry for non-relativistic strings,JHEP02(2022) 116 [2107.00642]

    work page arXiv 2022

  21. [21]

    Oling and Z

    G. Oling and Z. Yan,Aspects of Nonrelativistic Strings,Front. in Phys.10(2022) 832271 [2202.12698]

    work page arXiv 2022

  22. [22]

    Harksen, D

    M. Harksen, D. Hidalgo, W. Sybesma and L. Thorlacius,Carroll strings with an extended symmetry algebra,JHEP05(2024) 206 [2403.01984]

    work page arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    Lifshitz holography,

    M. Taylor,Lifshitz holography,Class. Quant. Grav.33(2016), no. 3 033001 [1512.03554]

    work page arXiv 2016

  24. [24]

    Lévy-Leblond,Une nouvelle limite non-relativiste du groupe de poincaré,Annales De L Institut Henri Poincare-physique Theorique3(1965) 1–12

    J.-M. Lévy-Leblond,Une nouvelle limite non-relativiste du groupe de poincaré,Annales De L Institut Henri Poincare-physique Theorique3(1965) 1–12. – 27 –

    1965

  25. [25]

    Brugues, J

    J. Brugues, J. Gomis and K. Kamimura,Newton-Hooke algebras, non-relativistic branes and generalized pp-wave metrics,Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 085011 [hep-th/0603023]

    work page arXiv 2006

  26. [26]

    J. G. D. J. R. Derome,Hooke’s symmetries and nonrelativistic cosmological kinematics. — I, Il Nuovo Cimento B (1971-1996)9(1972) 351–376 [10.1007/BF02734453]

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02734453 1971

  27. [27]

    Aldrovandi, A

    R. Aldrovandi, A. L. Barbosa, L. C. B. Crispino and J. G. Pereira,Non-Relativistic spacetimes with cosmological constant,Class. Quant. Grav.16(1999) 495–506 [gr-qc/9801100]

    work page arXiv 1999

  28. [28]

    Gao,Symmetries, matrices, and de Sitter gravity,Conf

    Y.-h. Gao,Symmetries, matrices, and de Sitter gravity,Conf. Proc. C0208124(2002) 271–310 [hep-th/0107067]

    work page arXiv 2002

  29. [29]

    Grumiller, J

    D. Grumiller, J. Hartong, S. Prohazka and J. Salzer,Limits of JT gravity,JHEP02(2021) 134 [2011.13870]

    work page arXiv 2021

  30. [30]

    Gomis, D

    J. Gomis, D. Hidalgo and P. Salgado-Rebolledo,Non-relativistic and Carrollian limits of Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity,JHEP05(2021) 162 [2011.15053]

    work page arXiv 2021

  31. [31]

    T. G. Mertens and G. J. Turiaci,Solvable models of quantum black holes: a review on Jackiw–Teitelboim gravity,Living Rev. Rel.26(2023), no. 1 4 [2210.10846]

    work page arXiv 2023

  32. [32]

    Bacry and J

    H. Bacry and J. Levy-Leblond,Possible kinematics,J. Math. Phys.9(1968) 1605–1614

    1968

  33. [33]

    G. W. Gibbons and C. E. Patricot,Newton-Hooke space-times, Hpp waves and the cosmological constant,Class. Quant. Grav.20(2003) 5225 [hep-th/0308200]

    work page arXiv 2003

  34. [34]

    Coussaert, M

    O. Coussaert, M. Henneaux and P. van Driel,The Asymptotic dynamics of three-dimensional Einstein gravity with a negative cosmological constant,Class. Quant. Grav.12(1995) 2961–2966 [gr-qc/9506019]

    work page arXiv 1995

  35. [35]

    E. A. Ivanov and V. I. Ogievetsky,The Inverse Higgs Phenomenon in Nonlinear Realizations, Teor. Mat. Fiz.25(1975) 164–177

    1975

  36. [36]

    Afshar, H

    H. Afshar, H. A. González, D. Grumiller and D. Vassilevich,Flat space holography and the complex Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model,Phys. Rev. D101(2020), no. 8 086024 [1911.05739]

    work page arXiv 2020

  37. [37]

    H. R. Afshar,Warped Schwarzian theory,JHEP02(2020) 126 [1908.08089]

    work page arXiv 2020

  38. [38]

    A. A. Kirillov,Elements of the Theory of Representations, vol. 220 ofGrundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 1 ed., 1976

    1976

  39. [39]

    Kostant,Quantization and unitary representations

    B. Kostant,Quantization and unitary representations. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1970

    1970

  40. [40]

    Souriau,Structure des systèmes dynamiques

    J.-M. Souriau,Structure des systèmes dynamiques. Dunod, Paris, 1970. Réimprimé par les éditions Jacques Gabay, 2008

    1970

  41. [41]

    R. P. Woodard,Ostrogradsky’s theorem on Hamiltonian instability,Scholarpedia10(2015), no. 8 32243 [1506.02210]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2015

  42. [42]

    Maldacena, G

    J. Maldacena, G. J. Turiaci and Z. Yang,Two dimensional Nearly de Sitter gravity,JHEP01 (2021) 139 [1904.01911]

    work page arXiv 2021

  43. [43]

    Cotler, K

    J. Cotler, K. Jensen and A. Maloney,Low-dimensional de Sitter quantum gravity,JHEP06 (2020) 048 [1905.03780]

    work page arXiv 2020

  44. [44]

    Fermionic Localization of the Schwarzian Theory,

    D. Stanford and E. Witten,Fermionic Localization of the Schwarzian Theory,JHEP10(2017) 008 [1703.04612]

    work page arXiv 2017

  45. [45]

    Cartan,Sur les variétés à connexion affine et la théorie de la relativité généralisée (première partie),Ann

    E. Cartan,Sur les variétés à connexion affine et la théorie de la relativité généralisée (première partie),Ann. Éc. Norm. Supér.40(1923) 325–412. – 28 –

    1923

  46. [46]

    Cartan,Sur les variétés à connexion affine et la théorie de la relativité généralisée (suite), Ann

    E. Cartan,Sur les variétés à connexion affine et la théorie de la relativité généralisée (suite), Ann. Éc. Norm. Supér.41(1924) 1–25

    1924

  47. [47]

    Hartong, N

    J. Hartong, N. A. Obers and G. Oling,Review on Non-Relativistic Gravity,Front. in Phys.11 (2023) 1116888 [2212.11309]

    work page arXiv 2023

  48. [48]

    Hansen, J

    D. Hansen, J. Hartong and N. A. Obers,Gravity between Newton and Einstein,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D28(2019), no. 14 1944010 [1904.05706]

    work page arXiv 2019

  49. [49]

    E. A. Bergshoeff, J. Hartong and J. Rosseel,Torsional Newton–Cartan geometry and the Schrödinger algebra,Class. Quant. Grav.32(2015), no. 13 135017 [1409.5555]

    work page arXiv 2015

  50. [50]

    Lifshitz space–times for Schr¨ odinger holography,

    J. Hartong, E. Kiritsis and N. A. Obers,Lifshitz space–times for Schrödinger holography,Phys. Lett. B746(2015) 318–324 [1409.1519]

    work page arXiv 2015

  51. [51]

    Hartong, A

    J. Hartong, A. Mehra and J. Musaeus,Galilean fluids from non-relativistic gravity,JHEP10 (2024) 156 [2408.16734]

    work page arXiv 2024

  52. [52]

    Duval, G

    C. Duval, G. Burdet, H. P. Kunzle and M. Perrin,Bargmann Structures and Newton-cartan Theory,Phys. Rev. D31(1985) 1841–1853

    1985

  53. [53]

    Andringa,Newton-Cartan gravity revisited

    R. Andringa,Newton-Cartan gravity revisited. PhD thesis, High-Energy Frontier, Groningen U., Groningen U., 2016

    2016

  54. [54]

    M. J. Blacker, A. Castro, W. Sybesma and C. Toldo,Quantum corrections to the path integral of near extremal de Sitter black holes,JHEP08(2025) 120 [2503.14623]

    work page arXiv 2025

  55. [55]

    Logarithmic corrections to near-extremal entropy of charged de Sitter black holes,

    S. Maulik, A. Mitra, D. Mukherjee and A. Ray,Logarithmic corrections to near-extremal entropy of charged de Sitter black holes,JHEP01(2026) 156 [2503.08617]

    work page arXiv 2026

  56. [56]

    Maulik, L

    S. Maulik, L. A. Pando Zayas, A. Ray and J. Zhang,Universality in logarithmic temperature corrections to near-extremal rotating black hole thermodynamics in various dimensions,JHEP 06(2024) 034 [2401.16507]

    work page arXiv 2024

  57. [57]

    L. A. Pando Zayas and J. Zhang,A Universality Theorem for the Quantum Thermodynamics of Near-Extremal Black Holes,2602.16767

    work page arXiv

  58. [58]

    Witten,Coadjoint Orbits of the Virasoro Group,Commun

    E. Witten,Coadjoint Orbits of the Virasoro Group,Commun. Math. Phys.114(1988) 1

    1988

  59. [59]

    Alekseev and S

    A. Alekseev and S. L. Shatashvili,Path Integral Quantization of the Coadjoint Orbits of the Virasoro Group and 2D Gravity,Nucl. Phys. B323(1989) 719–733

    1989

  60. [60]

    P. Saad, S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford,JT gravity as a matrix integral,1903.11115. – 29 –

    work page Pith review arXiv 1903