pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.07545 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-08 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Impact of charge transition levels on grain boundary properties in acceptor doped oxide ceramics: A phase-field study

Kai Wang , Sangjun Kang , Mahmoud Serour , Roger A. De Souza , Andreas Klein , Rotraut Merkle , Wolfgang Rheinheimer , Christian K\"ubel
show 3 more authors
Lijun Zhang Karsten Albe Bai-Xiang Xu
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 17:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords phase-field modelcharge transition levelsspace charge layersgrain boundariesSrTiO3defect chemistryoxide ceramicssolute drag
0
0 comments X

The pith

Charge transition levels govern space-charge layer formation and grain boundary migration in acceptor-doped oxide ceramics.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a phase-field model that incorporates charge transition levels to simulate how defects behave at grain boundaries in Fe-doped SrTiO3. It shows that these levels set bulk defect chemistry and trigger extra charge-state changes inside space-charge layers, which in turn fixes the layers' properties. The model also finds that hole movement enabled by these levels travels much faster than dopant atoms diffuse, altering how boundaries drag solutes and move. Simulations produce two kinds of boundaries during migration, slow and fast, each with its own characteristics that depend on prior heating. This links defect details directly to interface motion and suggests ways to tune ceramic microstructures.

Core claim

The central claim is that a defect-chemistry-consistent phase-field model explicitly coupled with charge transition levels reveals their decisive influence on space-charge-layer characteristics and grain-boundary kinetics in Fe-doped SrTiO3. CTL-governed bulk defect chemistry, combined with CTL-induced charge-state transitions within SCLs, determines SCL features. CTL-mediated hole transport outpaces acceptor dopant diffusion and thereby modulates solute drag and boundary movement, yielding predictions that grain-boundary properties depend on thermal history and boundary type, with slow and fast boundaries displaying distinct behaviors.

What carries the argument

A defect-chemistry-consistent phase-field model explicitly coupled with charge transition levels, which tracks multivalent oxygen vacancies, multivalent acceptor dopants, electrons, and holes while allowing the levels to bend inside evolving space-charge layers.

Load-bearing premise

Charge transition levels and defect formation energies taken from prior literature remain valid when the phase-field order parameter evolves and no unmodeled effects alter charge-state transitions inside the space-charge layers.

What would settle it

Direct experimental measurements of space-charge layer widths or grain-boundary migration velocities in Fe-doped SrTiO3 across a range of oxygen partial pressures and temperatures that deviate systematically from the model's outputs would falsify the claimed central role of charge transition levels.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.07545 by Andreas Klein, Bai-Xiang Xu, Christian K\"ubel, Kai Wang, Karsten Albe, Lijun Zhang, Mahmoud Serour, Roger A. De Souza, Rotraut Merkle, Sangjun Kang, Wolfgang Rheinheimer.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: STEM–EDS characterization of Fe segregation at representative GBs in a 2% Fe-doped sample. (a) Crystallographic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Calculated bulk defect concentrations for 0.2% Fe-doped STO at 600 K and 1623 K under varying oxygen partial pressure. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The equilibrium SCL formation in bicrystalline 0.2% Fe-doped STO at (a) 600 K and (b) 1623 K under various oxygen [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The GB potential and the space-charge width in Fe-doped STO at (a) 600 K and (b) 1623 K as a function of oxygen [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Asymmetric SCL formation at quasi-equilibrium state for different GB moving velocities for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Asymmetric SCL formation at quasi-equilibrium state for different GB moving velocities for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Asymmetric SCL formation at quasi-equilibrium state for different GB moving velocities for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (a) GB velocity as a function of total driving force in Fe-doped STO under three representative oxygen partial pressures [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The phase-field model is employed to predict GB properties as a function of thermal history and GB type. Sintering [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Advanced doping strategies enable oxide ceramic functionalities by tailoring bulk defect chemistry and space-charge-layer (SCL) behavior at interfaces. Charge transition levels (CTLs), defined as the Fermi level at which a defect changes its stable charge state, play a central role. Their alignment governs bulk defect chemistry, while their bending within SCLs induces additional charge-state transitions. Incorporating CTLs is therefore essential for a consistent description of defect equilibria and SCL formation. In this work, we propose a defect-chemistry-consistent phase-field model explicitly coupled with CTLs to investigate their role in SCL evolution. The model includes multivalent oxygen vacancies, multivalent acceptor dopants, electrons, and holes. It is applied to Fe-doped SrTiO3 over wide ranges of oxygen partial pressure and temperature, capturing both symmetric SCLs at stationary grain boundaries and asymmetric SCLs during migration. Two distinct grain boundary types, slow and fast boundaries, emerge during migration, consistent with experimental observations. Simulations reveal that CTL-governed bulk defect chemistry, together with CTL-induced charge-state transitions within SCLs, critically determine SCL characteristics. Moreover, CTL-mediated hole transport is significantly faster than acceptor dopant diffusion, modulating solute drag and grain boundary kinetics. Finally, the model predicts grain boundary properties dependent on both thermal history and boundary type, with slow and fast boundaries exhibiting distinct behaviors. This framework links defect chemistry, Fermi level, CTLs, and grain boundary kinetics, providing new insights for designing oxide ceramics with tailored properties.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a defect-chemistry-consistent phase-field model for Fe-doped SrTiO3 that explicitly incorporates charge transition levels (CTLs) for multivalent oxygen vacancies and acceptor dopants. The model simulates symmetric SCLs at stationary grain boundaries and asymmetric SCLs during migration, predicting two distinct boundary types (slow and fast) whose properties depend on thermal history, with CTL-governed bulk defect equilibria and CTL-induced charge-state transitions inside SCLs controlling SCL characteristics, hole transport, solute drag, and grain-boundary kinetics.

Significance. If the central predictions hold under the stated assumptions, the work supplies a mechanistic framework connecting Fermi-level position, CTLs, defect equilibria, and history-dependent grain-boundary mobility in acceptor-doped oxides. The explicit treatment of multivalent defects and the emergence of slow/fast boundaries from the same set of equations are strengths that could inform doping strategies for tailored ceramic microstructures.

major comments (2)
  1. [Model formulation and results on SCL evolution] The central claim that CTL-governed bulk chemistry plus CTL-induced transitions inside SCLs critically determine SCL profiles, hole accumulation, and solute drag rests on treating literature CTLs and formation energies as fixed inputs (see model formulation and defect-equilibrium equations). No local correction or sensitivity analysis is presented for possible shifts in CTLs arising from the evolving order parameter inside the grain-boundary core; a 0.2–0.3 eV shift would alter the predicted charge-state transitions and the distinction between slow and fast boundaries.
  2. [Results and discussion] The abstract states consistency with experimental observations of slow and fast boundaries, yet the results section supplies no quantitative comparisons (e.g., mobility ratios, activation energies, or SCL widths) with error bars, parameter sources, or sensitivity tests against the cited experiments.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Methods] Notation for the order-parameter coupling to defect formation energies should be clarified to avoid ambiguity between bulk and core values.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions for the slow/fast boundary trajectories would benefit from explicit labels of the oxygen partial pressure and temperature conditions used.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and positive review of our manuscript on the defect-chemistry-consistent phase-field model for Fe-doped SrTiO3. We address each major comment below and describe the revisions we will implement to strengthen the work.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Model formulation and results on SCL evolution] The central claim that CTL-governed bulk chemistry plus CTL-induced transitions inside SCLs critically determine SCL profiles, hole accumulation, and solute drag rests on treating literature CTLs and formation energies as fixed inputs (see model formulation and defect-equilibrium equations). No local correction or sensitivity analysis is presented for possible shifts in CTLs arising from the evolving order parameter inside the grain-boundary core; a 0.2–0.3 eV shift would alter the predicted charge-state transitions and the distinction between slow and fast boundaries.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee's observation on the treatment of CTLs. Our model adopts fixed literature values for CTLs to maintain consistency with established bulk defect equilibria, following standard practice in defect-chemistry modeling. We acknowledge that the grain-boundary core, where the order parameter varies continuously, could induce local shifts in CTLs not captured by fixed inputs. To address this, we will add a dedicated sensitivity analysis in the revised manuscript. Specifically, we will vary the CTL positions by ±0.3 eV around the literature values, recompute the SCL profiles and boundary migration kinetics, and demonstrate that the emergence and distinction of slow versus fast boundaries remain robust, although the precise transition points and mobility ratios may shift quantitatively. This analysis will be presented in the results section with accompanying figures. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results and discussion] The abstract states consistency with experimental observations of slow and fast boundaries, yet the results section supplies no quantitative comparisons (e.g., mobility ratios, activation energies, or SCL widths) with error bars, parameter sources, or sensitivity tests against the cited experiments.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript would benefit from more explicit quantitative links to experiment. The current results focus on the mechanistic prediction that two distinct boundary types arise naturally from the same set of CTL-governed equations, which is consistent with the qualitative experimental reports of slow and fast migrating boundaries in acceptor-doped oxides. Direct quantitative comparison is limited by the range of experimental conditions and the absence of fully specified parameter sets in the cited literature. In the revision, we will expand the discussion section to include quantitative comparisons: simulated mobility ratios and SCL widths will be tabulated against representative experimental values, with explicit citation of the literature sources for all model parameters. We will also add a brief sensitivity discussion and include error bars derived from variations in key inputs such as formation energies and diffusivities. These additions will clarify the degree of agreement while noting remaining uncertainties. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; model uses external inputs to generate independent predictions

full rationale

The paper proposes a new defect-chemistry-consistent phase-field model that takes charge transition levels and defect formation energies as fixed inputs from prior literature, then evolves an order parameter to simulate SCL profiles, hole transport, solute drag, and slow/fast grain-boundary distinctions under varying pO2, temperature, and thermal history. No quoted equations or steps show that the key outputs (e.g., CTL-induced charge-state transitions inside SCLs or history-dependent kinetics) reduce by construction to the inputs, nor are there load-bearing self-citations, uniqueness theorems imported from the authors' prior work, or fitted parameters renamed as predictions. The derivation chain remains self-contained with independent content from the model dynamics.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard defect-chemistry mass-action laws, literature-derived charge transition levels, and conventional phase-field assumptions about interface energy and mobility; no new entities are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • Charge transition levels for oxygen vacancies and Fe acceptors
    CTL values are required inputs that set the Fermi-level dependence of defect charge states and are taken from prior calculations or experiment.
  • Defect formation energies and mobilities
    These parameters control bulk equilibria and transport rates and must be supplied to run the simulations over the stated ranges of pO2 and temperature.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Defect equilibria obey mass-action laws with charge states determined by CTLs
    Invoked throughout the model construction to maintain consistency between bulk and interface regions.
  • standard math Phase-field order parameter evolves according to standard Allen-Cahn or Cahn-Hilliard dynamics
    Underlying numerical framework for tracking grain-boundary motion.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5611 in / 1550 out tokens · 74264 ms · 2026-05-10T17:08:33.078385+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Accurate Nanoscale Mapping of Electric Fields across Random Grain Boundaries in Polycrystalline Oxides Using Precession-Assisted 4D-STEM

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Precession-assisted 4D-STEM combined with Sobel filter and SVD post-processing enables accurate, artefact-reduced mapping of electric fields and charge distributions across random grain boundaries in BaTiO3 and SrTiO3.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    C. Hou, W. Huang, W. Zhao, D. Zhang, Y. Yin, X. Li, Ultrahigh energy density in SrTiO3 film capacitors, ACS applied materials & interfaces 9 (24) (2017) 20484–20490

    work page 2017

  2. [2]

    Stengel, N

    M. Stengel, N. A. Spaldin, Origin of the dielectric dead layer in nanoscale capacitors, Nature 443 (7112) (2006) 679–682

    work page 2006

  3. [3]

    H. Tang, Y. Lin, H. A. Sodano, Synthesis of high aspect ratio BaTiO3 nanowires for high energy density nanocomposite capacitors, Advanced Energy Materials 3 (4) (2013) 451–456

    work page 2013

  4. [4]

    Kursumovic, E

    A. Kursumovic, E. Defay, O. J. Lee, C.-F. Tsai, Z. Bi, H. Wang, J. L. MacManus-Driscoll, A new material for high-temperature lead-free actuators, Advanced Functional Materials 23 (47) (2013) 5881–5886

    work page 2013

  5. [5]

    J. Gao, D. Xue, W. Liu, C. Zhou, X. Ren, Recent progress on BaTiO3-based piezoelectric ceramics for actuator applications, in: Actuators, Vol. 6, MDPI, 2017, p. 24

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    Z. Wang, Z. Liu, G. Zhao, Z. Zhang, X. Zhao, X. Wan, Y. Zhang, Z. L. Wang, L. Li, Stretchable unsym- metrical piezoelectric BaTiO3 composite hydrogel for triboelectric nanogenerators and multimodal sensors, ACS nano 16 (1) (2022) 1661–1670

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    N. Y. Chan, M. Zhao, J. Huang, K. Au, M. H. Wong, H. M. Yao, W. Lu, Y. Chen, C. W. Ong, H. L. W. Chan, et al., Highly sensitive gas sensor by the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 heterostructure with Pd nanoparticle surface modulation, Advanced materials 26 (34) (2014) 5962–5968

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    Mater 22 (43) (2010) 4819–4822

    R.Muenstermann, T.Menke, R.Dittmann, R.Waser, Coexistenceoffilamentaryandhomogeneousresistive switching in Fe-doped SrTiO3 thin-film memristive devices, Adv. Mater 22 (43) (2010) 4819–4822

    work page 2010

  9. [9]

    Molinari, R

    A. Molinari, R. Witte, K. K. Neelisetty, S. Gorji, C. Kübel, I. Münch, F. Wöhler, L. Hahn, S. Hengsbach, K. Bade, et al., Configurable resistive response in BaTiO3 ferroelectric memristors via electron beam radiation, Advanced Materials 32 (12) (2020) 1907541

    work page 2020

  10. [10]

    T. Guo, M. Y. Shah, Y. Lu, Y. Chen, L. Cai, Cobalt-doped BaTiO3: A pathway to high-efficiency electro- chemical systems for LT-CFC, Ceramics International (2025)

    work page 2025

  11. [11]

    M. Y. Shah, S. Rauf, N. Mushtaq, Z. Tayyab, N. Ali, M. Yousaf, Y. Xing, M. Akbar, P. D. Lund, C. P. Yang, et al., Semiconductor Fe-doped SrTiO3-δperovskite electrolyte for low-temperature solid oxide fuel cell (LT-SOFC) operating below 520°C, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 45 (28) (2020) 14470– 14479

    work page 2020

  12. [12]

    Y. Feng, J. Wu, Q. Chi, W. Li, Y. Yu, W. Fei, Defects and aliovalent doping engineering in electroceramics, Chemical reviews 120 (3) (2020) 1710–1787

    work page 2020

  13. [13]

    Xiong, G

    Q. Xiong, G. Han, G. Wang, X. Lu, X. Zhou, The doping strategies for modulation of transport properties in thermoelectric materials, Advanced Functional Materials 34 (52) (2024) 2411304

    work page 2024

  14. [14]

    J. Maier, Defect chemistry: composition, transport, and reactions in the solid state; part I: thermodynam- ics, Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English 32 (3) (1993) 313–335

    work page 1993

  15. [15]

    Maier, Physical chemistry of ionic materials: ions and electrons in solids, John Wiley & Sons, 2023

    J. Maier, Physical chemistry of ionic materials: ions and electrons in solids, John Wiley & Sons, 2023

    work page 2023

  16. [16]

    Klein, K

    A. Klein, K. Albe, N. Bein, O. Clemens, K. A. Creutz, P. Erhart, M. Frericks, E. Ghorbani, J. P. Hofmann, B. Huang, et al., The fermi energy as common parameter to describe charge compensation mechanisms: A path to fermi level engineering of oxide electroceramics, Journal of Electroceramics 51 (3) (2023) 147–177

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    Yang, J.-S

    J.-H. Yang, J.-S. Park, J. Kang, W. Metzger, T. Barnes, S.-H. Wei, Tuning the fermi level beyond the equilibrium doping limit through quenching: The case of cdte, Physical Review B 90 (24) (2014) 245202

    work page 2014

  18. [18]

    Chaoudhary, A

    S. Chaoudhary, A. Aumen, E. C. Dickey, A. Klein, Direct determination of the charge transition level of dopants in oxides by x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, Physical Review Materials 9 (7) (2025) 075002

    work page 2025

  19. [19]

    Chaoudhary, L

    S. Chaoudhary, L. Nguyen, X. Xiao, A. Weidenkaff, A. Klein, M. Widenmeyer, Uncovering the electronic effects of cr doping in Ba2In2O5, Chemistry of Materials 37 (4) (2025) 1621–1628

    work page 2025

  20. [20]

    Y.Liu, S.Frick, K.N.Lohaus, A.Klein, Co2+/3+andFe2+/3+chargetransitionlevelsin(La, Sr)CoO 3-δ and (La, Sr)FeO3-δ, Physical Review Materials 9 (7) (2025) 075405. 28

    work page 2025

  21. [21]

    Suzuki, L

    I. Suzuki, L. Gura, A. Klein, The energy level of the Fe2+/3+ transition in BaTiO3 and SrTiO3 single crystals, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 21 (11) (2019) 6238–6246

    work page 2019

  22. [22]

    Wechsler, M

    B. Wechsler, M. B. Klein, Thermodynamic point defect model of barium titanate and application to the photorefractive effect, Journal of the Optical Society of America B 5 (8) (1988) 1711–1723

    work page 1988

  23. [23]

    Suzuki, B

    I. Suzuki, B. Huang, T. Omata, A. Klein, Fermi energy limitation atβ-CuGaO2 interfaces induced by electrochemical oxidation/reduction of Cu, ACS Applied Energy Materials 3 (9) (2020) 9117–9125

    work page 2020

  24. [24]

    Bonkowski, M

    A. Bonkowski, M. J. Wolf, J. Wu, S. C. Parker, A. Klein, R. A. De Souza, A single model for the ther- modynamics and kinetics of metal exsolution from perovskite oxides, Journal of the American Chemical Society 146 (33) (2024) 23012–23021

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    Wang, H.-B

    J.-J. Wang, H.-B. Huang, T. J. Bayer, A. Moballegh, Y. Cao, A. Klein, E. C. Dickey, D. L. Irving, C. A. Randall, L.-Q. Chen, Defect chemistry and resistance degradation in Fe-doped SrTiO3 single crystal, Acta Materialia 108 (2016) 229–240

    work page 2016

  26. [26]

    Usler, F

    A. Usler, F. Ketter, R. De Souza, How space-charge behaviour at grain boundaries in electroceramic oxides is modified by two restricted equilibria, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 26 (10) (2024) 8287–8298

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    K. N. S. Lohaus, Defect level identification in acceptor-doped polycrystalline barium titanate (2023)

    work page 2023

  28. [28]

    R. A. De Souza, The formation of equilibrium space-charge zones at grain boundaries in the perovskite oxide SrTiO3, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 11 (43) (2009) 9939–9969

    work page 2009

  29. [29]

    De Souza, E

    R. De Souza, E. Dickey, The effect of space-charge formation on the grain-boundary energy of an ionic solid, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 377 (2152) (2019) 20180430

    work page 2019

  30. [30]

    P. C. McIntyre, Equilibrium point defect and electronic carrier distributions near interfaces in acceptor- doped strontium titanate, Journal of the American Ceramic Society 83 (5) (2000) 1129–1136

    work page 2000

  31. [31]

    Jamnik, J

    J. Jamnik, J. Maier, S. Pejovnik, Interfaces in solid ionic conductors: Equilibrium and small signal picture, Solid State Ionics 75 (1995) 51–58

    work page 1995

  32. [32]

    J. W. Cahn, The impurity-drag effect in grain boundary motion, Acta metallurgica 10 (9) (1962) 789–798

    work page 1962

  33. [33]

    Rheinheimer, M

    W. Rheinheimer, M. J. Hoffmann, Non-arrhenius behavior of grain growth in strontium titanate: New evidence for a structural transition of grain boundaries, Scripta Materialia 101 (2015) 68–71

    work page 2015

  34. [34]

    Rheinheimer, M

    W. Rheinheimer, M. J. Hoffmann, Grain growth transitions of perovskite ceramics and their relationship to abnormal grain growth and bimodal microstructures, Journal of materials science 51 (4) (2016) 1756–1765

    work page 2016

  35. [35]

    G. S. Rohrer, Influence of interface anisotropy on grain growth and coarsening, Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 35 (1) (2005) 99–126

    work page 2005

  36. [36]

    G. S. Rohrer, Grain boundary energy anisotropy: a review, Journal of materials science 46 (18) (2011) 5881–5895

    work page 2011

  37. [37]

    S.G.Kim, Y.B.Park, Grainboundarysegregation, solutedragandabnormalgraingrowth, ActaMaterialia 56 (15) (2008) 3739–3753

    work page 2008

  38. [38]

    M. P. Zahler, S. M. Kraschewski, H. Stoermer, D. Gerthsen, M. Baeurer, W. Rheinheimer, Grain growth and segregation in Fe-doped SrTiO3: Experimental evidence for solute drag, Journal of the European Ceramic Society 43 (4) (2023) 1613–1624

    work page 2023

  39. [39]

    K. Wang, R. A. De Souza, X.-L. Peng, R. Merkle, W. Rheinheimer, K. Albe, B.-X. Xu, A defect-chemistry- informed phase-field model of grain growth in oxide electroceramics, arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.17650 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  40. [40]

    Vikrant, W

    K. Vikrant, W. Rheinheimer, H. Sternlicht, M. Bäurer, R. E. García, Electrochemically-driven abnormal grain growth in ionic ceramics, Acta materialia 200 (2020) 727–734

    work page 2020

  41. [41]

    Vikrant, W

    K. Vikrant, W. Rheinheimer, R. E. García, Electrochemical drag effect on grain boundary motion in ionic ceramics, npj computational materials 6 (1) (2020) 165

    work page 2020

  42. [42]

    K. Wang, G. Boussinot, C. Hüter, E. A. Brener, R. Spatschek, Modeling of dendritic growth using a quantitative nondiagonal phase field model, Physical review materials 4 (3) (2020) 033802. 29

    work page 2020

  43. [43]

    K. Wang, G. Boussinot, E. A. Brener, R. Spatschek, Quantitative nondiagonal phase field modeling of eutectic and eutectoid transformations, Physical Review B 103 (18) (2021) 184111

    work page 2021

  44. [44]

    Y. Yang, O. Ragnvaldsen, Y. Bai, M. Yi, B.-X. Xu, 3D non-isothermal phase-field simulation of microstruc- ture evolution during selective laser sintering, npj Computational Materials 5 (1) (2019) 81

    work page 2019

  45. [45]

    T. D. Oyedeji, Y. Yang, H. Egger, B.-X. Xu, Variational quantitative phase-field modeling of nonisothermal sintering process, Physical Review E 108 (2) (2023) 025301

    work page 2023

  46. [46]

    J. E. Guyer, W. J. Boettinger, J. A. Warren, G. B. McFadden, Phase field modeling of electrochemistry. I. equilibrium, Physical Review E 69 (2) (2004) 021603

    work page 2004

  47. [47]

    J. E. Guyer, W. J. Boettinger, J. A. Warren, G. B. McFadden, Phase field modeling of electrochemistry. II. kinetics, Physical Review E 69 (2) (2004) 021604

    work page 2004

  48. [48]

    R. E. Garcıa, C. M. Bishop, W. C. Carter, Thermodynamically consistent variational principles with applications to electrically and magnetically active systems, Acta Materialia 52 (1) (2004) 11–21

    work page 2004

  49. [49]

    Kobayashi, J

    R. Kobayashi, J. A. Warren, W. C. Carter, A continuum model of grain boundaries, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 140 (1-2) (2000) 141–150

    work page 2000

  50. [50]

    L. K. Aagesen, S. A. Pitts, B. K. Harris, T. Yao, L. D. Robinson, R. E. García, Electrochemical grand potential-based phase-field simulation of electric field-assisted sintering, Acta Materialia 275 (2024) 120049

    work page 2024

  51. [51]

    X. Guo, W. Sigle, J. Maier, Blocking grain boundaries in yttria-doped and undoped ceria ceramics of high purity, Journal of the American Ceramic Society 86 (1) (2003) 77–87

    work page 2003

  52. [52]

    Swaroop, M

    S. Swaroop, M. Kilo, C. Argirusis, G. Borchardt, A. H. Chokshi, Lattice and grain boundary diffusion of cations in 3ytz analyzed using sims, Acta materialia 53 (19) (2005) 4975–4985

    work page 2005

  53. [53]

    Gregori, R

    G. Gregori, R. Merkle, J. Maier, Ion conduction and redistribution at grain boundaries in oxide systems, Progress in Materials Science 89 (2017) 252–305

    work page 2017

  54. [54]

    Tian, S.-W

    C. Tian, S.-W. Chan, Ionic conductivities, sintering temperatures and microstructures of bulk ceramic CeO2 doped with Y2O3, Solid state ionics 134 (1-2) (2000) 89–102

    work page 2000

  55. [55]

    Y. Lei, Y. Ito, N. D. Browning, T. J. Mazanec, Segregation effects at grain boundaries in fluorite-structured ceramics, Journal of the American Ceramic Society 85 (9) (2002) 2359–2363

    work page 2002

  56. [56]

    Z.-P. Li, T. Mori, G. J. Auchterlonie, J. Zou, J. Drennan, Direct evidence of dopant segregation in Gd-doped ceria, Applied Physics Letters 98 (9) (2011)

    work page 2011

  57. [57]

    D. R. Diercks, J. Tong, H. Zhu, R. Kee, G. Baure, J. C. Nino, R. O’Hayre, B. P. Gorman, Three-dimensional quantification of composition and electrostatic potential at individual grain boundaries in doped ceria, Journal of Materials Chemistry A 4 (14) (2016) 5167–5175

    work page 2016

  58. [58]

    X. Xu, Y. Liu, J. Wang, D. Isheim, V. P. Dravid, C. Phatak, S. M. Haile, Variability and origins of grain boundary electric potential detected by electron holography and atom-probe tomography, Nature materials 19 (8) (2020) 887–893

    work page 2020

  59. [59]

    M. P. Zahler, D. Jennings, O. Guillon, W. Rheinheimer, Non-arrhenius grain growth in SrTiO3: Impact on grain boundary conductivity and segregation, Acta Materialia 283 (2025) 120560

    work page 2025

  60. [60]

    R. Moos, K. H. Hardtl, Defect chemistry of donor-doped and undoped strontium titanate ceramics between 1000°and 1400°C, Journal of the American Ceramic Society 80 (10) (1997) 2549–2562

    work page 1997

  61. [61]

    Kröger, H

    F. Kröger, H. Vink, Relations between the concentrations of imperfections in crystalline solids, in: Solid state physics, Vol. 3, Elsevier, 1956, pp. 307–435

    work page 1956

  62. [62]

    S. G. Kim, W. T. Kim, T. Suzuki, Phase-field model for binary alloys, Physical review e 60 (6) (1999) 7186

    work page 1999

  63. [63]

    P.-R. Cha, S. G. Kim, D.-H. Yeon, J.-K. Yoon, A phase field model for the solute drag on moving grain boundaries, Acta materialia 50 (15) (2002) 3817–3829

    work page 2002

  64. [64]

    Moelans, B

    N. Moelans, B. Blanpain, P. Wollants, Quantitative analysis of grain boundary properties in a generalized phase field model for grain growth in anisotropic systems, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 78 (2) (2008) 024113. 30

    work page 2008

  65. [65]

    L.-Q. Chen, Y. Zhao, From classical thermodynamics to phase-field method, Progress in Materials Science 124 (2022) 100868

    work page 2022

  66. [66]

    Lei, T.-L

    Y. Lei, T.-L. Cheng, H. Abernathy, W. Epting, T. Kalapos, G. Hackett, Y. Wen, Phase field simulation of anode microstructure evolution of solid oxide fuel cell through Ni(OH)2 diffusion, Journal of Power Sources 482 (2021) 228971

    work page 2021

  67. [67]

    Duncan, B

    D. Duncan, B. Magyari-Köpe, Y. Nishi, Filament-induced anisotropic oxygen vacancy diffusion and charge trapping effects in hafnium oxide rram, IEEE Electron Device Letters 37 (4) (2016) 400–403

    work page 2016

  68. [68]

    M. P. Mueller, F. Gunkel, S. Hoffmann-Eifert, R. A. De Souza, The importance of singly charged oxygen vacancies for electrical conduction in monoclinic HfO2, Journal of Applied Physics 129 (2) (2021)

    work page 2021

  69. [69]

    S. M. Sze, Y. Li, K. K. Ng, Physics of semiconductor devices, John wiley & sons, 2021

    work page 2021

  70. [70]

    R. J. LeVeque, Finite difference methods for ordinary and partial differential equations: steady-state and time-dependent problems, SIAM, 2007

    work page 2007

  71. [71]

    Sanders, E

    J. Sanders, E. Kandrot, CUDA by example: an introduction to general-purpose GPU programming, Addison-Wesley Professional, 2010

    work page 2010

  72. [72]

    Zhang, Y

    Z. Zhang, Y. Ma, Z. Qiao, An adaptive time-stepping strategy for solving the phase field crystal model, Journal of Computational Physics 249 (2013) 204–215

    work page 2013

  73. [73]

    D. Kemp, R. A. De Souza, One stone, two birds: Using high electric fields to enhance the mobility and the concentration of point defects in ion-conducting solids, Journal of the American Chemical Society 146 (7) (2024) 4783–4794

    work page 2024

  74. [74]

    R. A. Maier, C. A. Randall, Low temperature ionic conductivity of an acceptor-doped perovskite: Impedance of single-crystal BaTiO3, Journal of the American Ceramic Society 99 (10) (2016) 3360–3366

    work page 2016

  75. [75]

    I. Denk, W. Münch, J. Maier, Partial conductivities in SrTiO3: bulk polarization experiments, oxygen concentration cell measurements, and defect-chemical modeling, Journal of the American Ceramic Society 78 (12) (1995) 3265–3272

    work page 1995

  76. [76]

    Meyer, R

    R. Meyer, R. Waser, J. Helmbold, G. Borchardt, Observation of vacancy defect migration in the cation sublattice of complex oxides by O18tracer experiments, Physical review letters 90 (10) (2003) 105901

    work page 2003

  77. [77]

    X. Tong, D. S. Mebane, R. A. De Souza, Analyzing the grain-boundary resistance of oxide-ion conducting electrolytes: Poisson-cahn vs poisson-boltzmann theories, Journal of the American Ceramic Society 103 (1) (2020) 5–22. 31

    work page 2020