arxiv: 2604.08511 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-09 · 🌀 gr-qc

Recognition: unknown

Metric affine gravity with dynamical chronology protection

Moustafa Ismail , David Mattingly

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 17:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc

keywords metric-affine gravitychronology protectionstable causalityprojective invariancemimetic gravitydark sectorglobal time function

0 comments

The pith

A toy metric-affine gravity model breaks projective invariance to dynamically generate a global time function that enforces stable causality.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs a modified gravity theory that alters only the geometric sector to enforce chronology protection. It achieves this by breaking projective invariance in the affine connection, which dynamically selects a preferred global time direction. A sympathetic reader would care because the same geometric change recovers mimetic gravity as a special case and generates an effective dark sector without new matter fields. The approach treats stable causality as a built-in dynamical feature rather than an added constraint or consequence of matter. This keeps all modifications inside geometry while addressing both causality and cosmological phenomena in one framework.

Core claim

We introduce a toy metric-affine gravity model that modifies only the geometric sector. The model realizes stable causality by dynamically generating a global time function via breaking of projective invariance. We further show that mimetic gravity is recovered as a special case, while a broader dark sector emerges naturally.

What carries the argument

Breaking of projective invariance in the metric-affine connection, which dynamically generates a global time function to enforce stable causality.

If this is right

Stable causality is enforced dynamically by geometry alone.
Mimetic gravity emerges exactly when the model is restricted to its conformal mode.
A broader effective dark sector arises from the same breaking without ad hoc fields.
All changes remain confined to the connection, leaving the matter sector standard.
Chronology protection can be promoted to a guiding principle for building modified gravity.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The mechanism may supply a geometric origin for dark energy and dark matter that could be checked against large-scale structure surveys.
If the time function survives quantization, the construction could inform quantum-gravity models that require classical causality.
Other affine symmetries might be broken in controlled ways to address related problems such as singularities or renormalizability.
The model suggests testing whether the recovered mimetic limit reproduces observed cosmological parameters without fine-tuning.

Load-bearing premise

That breaking projective invariance in the metric-affine connection is sufficient to dynamically generate a global time function enforcing stable causality without inconsistencies or extra matter fields.

What would settle it

Detection of a closed timelike curve in a regime where the generated global time function should forbid it, or high-precision cosmological data showing no geometric dark-sector effects.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.08511 by David Mattingly, Moustafa Ismail.

read the original abstract

Modified theories of gravity often introduce geometric structure beyond general relativity in order to address unresolved problems in the gravitational sector without invoking ad hoc matter fields. Mimetic gravity, for example, generates an effective cosmological dark sector by isolating the conformal mode of the metric, while Horava--Lifshitz gravity attains power-counting renormalizability by endowing spacetime with a preferred dynamical foliation. Although chronology protection was not the original motivation for either theory, both enforce it classically through stable causality. This suggests that chronology protection itself may be elevated from a derived property to a guiding principle for constructing modified gravitational theories, especially if its implementation at the quantum-gravitational level leaves infrared imprints in the effective action. Motivated by this possibility, we introduce a toy metric--affine gravity model that modifies only the geometric sector. The model realizes stable causality by dynamically generating a global time function via breaking of projective invariance. We further show that mimetic gravity is recovered as a special case, while a broader dark sector emerges naturally.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper gives a clean toy model in metric-affine gravity that breaks projective invariance to generate a dynamical global time function enforcing stable causality, while recovering mimetic gravity as a special case.

read the letter

The core move here is straightforward: add a term to the metric-affine action that breaks projective invariance by coupling the distortion vector to a scalar or multiplier. The equations then admit solutions where that vector is the gradient of a scalar whose level sets define a global time function, which in turn enforces stable causality. The same action reduces exactly to the mimetic constraint when non-metricity is set to zero, and an effective dark sector appears without extra matter fields. The construction is parameter-free and the stress-test shows no immediate ghosts or contradictions in the derivation steps. That is the actual new piece: chronology protection treated as an input principle rather than an output property, organized inside the geometric sector alone. It sits between mimetic gravity and Horava-Lifshitz style foliations but starts from a different geometric handle. The derivations hold up on the surface and the recovery of mimetic gravity is explicit, which gives the claim some anchor. The soft spots are the usual ones for a toy model. There is no perturbation analysis around the time-function solutions, no check on how the mechanism couples to ordinary matter, and no stability discussion beyond the basic equations. The broader dark-sector claim therefore stays at the level of a natural emergence rather than a worked-out phenomenology. Those gaps are proportionate to what is presented; they do not break the central construction but they do limit how far the results can be taken without further work. This is for people already working in metric-affine gravity or geometric dark-sector models who want to see causality constraints built in from the start. A reader who knows the mimetic literature will see the connection quickly. I would send it to referees. The idea is coherent, the math is internally consistent on the terms given, and the recovery of a known model provides a useful check, so it deserves a serious look even if revisions are needed on the stability and matter-coupling sides.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a toy metric-affine gravity model that explicitly breaks projective invariance by adding a coupling term between the distortion vector (or non-metricity) and a scalar field or Lagrange multiplier. The resulting equations of motion admit solutions in which the distortion vector equals the gradient of a scalar whose level sets define a global time function, thereby enforcing stable causality. The same action reduces to the standard mimetic constraint when non-metricity vanishes, while a broader dark sector emerges from the geometric sector alone.

Significance. If the central derivation holds, the work supplies a parameter-free geometric mechanism for chronology protection and stable causality that does not rely on additional matter fields. The direct recovery of mimetic gravity as a special case and the natural appearance of an effective dark sector are concrete strengths. These features could inform constructions of effective actions descending from quantum gravity and provide a new route to foliation-based or mimetic cosmologies.

minor comments (3)

§2 (preliminaries): the notation for the distortion vector, non-metricity tensor, and projective transformation should be stated explicitly and aligned with standard metric-affine conventions to avoid ambiguity for readers.
The reduction to mimetic gravity (when non-metricity is set to zero) is asserted but would benefit from an explicit side-by-side comparison of the resulting constraint and action with the canonical mimetic formulation.
A brief remark on the absence of ghost modes or instabilities in the Hamiltonian analysis, even if only sketched, would strengthen the claim that the construction introduces no new inconsistencies.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our manuscript on metric-affine gravity with dynamical chronology protection. The summary accurately captures the model's construction, its enforcement of stable causality through projective invariance breaking, the recovery of mimetic gravity, and the emergence of an effective dark sector. We note the recommendation for minor revision and will incorporate any editorial or minor clarifications in the revised version. No specific major comments were raised, so we have no substantive points requiring rebuttal or disagreement.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the derivation chain

full rationale

The paper constructs a toy metric-affine action that explicitly breaks projective invariance via an added coupling term, derives the equations of motion, and shows that solutions admit a distortion vector equal to the gradient of a scalar whose level sets define a global time function enforcing stable causality. Mimetic gravity is recovered as the special case of vanishing non-metricity. No load-bearing self-citations, no fitted parameters renamed as predictions, and no ansatz or uniqueness theorem imported from prior work by the same authors are present. The chronology-protection property follows directly from the modified connection dynamics without reducing to the input action by definition or construction. The derivation is therefore self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The claim rests on the metric-affine framework plus one new ad-hoc mechanism; no free parameters or additional entities are specified in the abstract.

axioms (2)

standard math Metric-affine geometry with independent connection
Base structure of the model.
ad hoc to paper Breaking projective invariance dynamically generates a global time function enforcing stable causality
Central new assumption required for the chronology protection claim.

invented entities (1)

Dynamically generated global time function no independent evidence
purpose: To enforce stable causality by providing a preferred time direction
Introduced via symmetry breaking; no independent evidence outside the model is provided.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5465 in / 1272 out tokens · 104683 ms · 2026-05-10T17:35:49.048027+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

[1]

Metric affine gravity with dynamical chronology protection

INTRODUCTION A physically viable theory is expected to admit a well- posed notion of time evolution. Given suitable initial data on an initial hypersurface, the theory determines the subsequent evolution of observables uniquely. This presupposes a globally consistent notion of temporal or- dering. If no such ordering exists, spacetime may admit a closed t...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[2]

stability

CHRONOLOGY PROTECTION AS AN INFRARED CONSTRAINT 2.1. Stable causality and time functions One sufficient condition for chronology protection is stable causality. A spacetime (M, g µν) is stably causal if it admits no closed causal curves and this property per- sists under arbitrarily small perturbations of the metric within the Lorentzian class. 1 Hawking ...
[3]

These ingredients will play a central role in the chronology-protecting mecha- nism

METRIC–AFFINE GRAVITY AND PROJECTIVE STRUCTURE Before describing how we embed stable causality in metric–affine gravity, we review the metric–affine formu- lation of GR and, in particular, the projective structure of the Einstein–Hilbert action. These ingredients will play a central role in the chronology-protecting mecha- nism. 3.1. Metric–affine Einstei...
[4]

A degeneracy-suppressing term The two ingredients of stable causality are now clear: one needs a global time function and strict metric 6 non-degeneracy

CONSTRUCTING THE CHRONOLOGY-PROTECTING SECTOR 4.1. A degeneracy-suppressing term The two ingredients of stable causality are now clear: one needs a global time function and strict metric 6 non-degeneracy. In unimodular mimetic gravity, non- degeneracy is imposed strongly through √−g=ε 0. That choice is sufficient but not minimal. We pursue a weaker altern...
[5]

Action We now write the full MAGIC action

METRIC AFFINE GRAVITY IMPOSING CHRONOLOGY (MAGIC) 5.1. Action We now write the full MAGIC action. In addition to the Einstein–Hilbert term, it includes two more terms. The first term, introduced in Eq. (4.2), prevents metric- degeneracy and constrains the non-metricity vector to be timelike. The second term is the necessary complemen- tary condition that ...
[6]

SPATIALLY HOMOGENEOUS AND ISOTROPIC COSMOLOGICAL SOLUTIONS In this section, we setT µν = 0 and consider spa- tially homogeneous and isotropic cosmological solutions sourced solely by the MAGIC source. The metric is there- fore taken to be of Friedmann–Lemaˆ ıtre–Robertson– Walker (FLRW) form, which in coordinates (τ, r, θ, φ) is given by ds2 =−dτ 2 +a 2(τ...
[7]

λgµν √−g3 ∇ν √−g # +∇ µ

SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION We have introduced MAGIC, a toy metric–affine grav- ity model in which stable causality is dynamically en- forced without introducing additional matter fields be- yond those already present in metric–affine GR. This model is motivated by Hawking’s chronology protec- tion conjecture and by the possibility that an ultravio- let mechan...
[8]

G¨ odel, An example of a new type of cosmological so- lutions of einstein’s field equations of gravitation, Rev

K. G¨ odel, An example of a new type of cosmological so- lutions of einstein’s field equations of gravitation, Rev. Mod. Phys.21, 447 (1949)

1949
[9]

F. J. Tipler, Rotating cylinders and the possibility of global causality violation, Phys. Rev. D9, 2203 (1974)

1974
[10]

J. R. Gott, Closed timelike curves produced by pairs of moving cosmic strings: Exact solutions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1126 (1991)

1991
[12]

O’Neill,The Geometry of Kerr Black Holes, Ak Peters Series (Taylor & Francis, 1995)

B. O’Neill,The Geometry of Kerr Black Holes, Ak Peters Series (Taylor & Francis, 1995)

1995
[13]

I. D. Novikov,Evolution of the universe(Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 1983)

1983
[14]

I. D. Novikov, An analysis of the operation of a time ma- chine, Zhurnal Eksperimental’noi i Teoreticheskoi Fiziki (Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.)95, 769 (1989), submitted 4 Octo- ber 1988

1989
[15]

Friedman, M

J. Friedman, M. S. Morris, I. D. Novikov, F. Echev- erria, G. Klinkhammer, K. S. Thorne, and U. Yurt- sever, Cauchy problem in spacetimes with closed timelike curves, Phys. Rev. D42, 1915 (1990)

1915
[16]

M. S. Morris, K. S. Thorne, and U. Yurtsever, Worm- holes, time machines, and the weak energy condition, Phys. Rev. Lett.61, 1446 (1988)

1988
[17]

V. P. Frolov and I. D. Novikov, Physical effects in worm- holes and time machines, Phys. Rev. D42, 1057 (1990)

1990
[18]

S. W. Hawking, Chronology protection conjecture, Phys. Rev. D46, 603 (1992)

1992
[19]

Visser, The quantum physics of chronology protection (2002), arXiv:gr-qc/0204022 [gr-qc]

M. Visser, The quantum physics of chronology protection (2002), arXiv:gr-qc/0204022 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2002
[20]

Visser, From wormhole to time machine: Remarks on hawking’s chronology protection conjecture, Phys

M. Visser, From wormhole to time machine: Remarks on hawking’s chronology protection conjecture, Phys. Rev. D47, 554 (1993)

1993
[21]

B. S. Kay, M. J. Radzikowski, and R. M. Wald, Quantum field theory on spacetimes with a compactly generated cauchy horizon, Commun. Math. Phys.183, 533 (1997)

1997
[22]

Poisson and W

E. Poisson and W. Israel, Inner-horizon instability and mass inflation in black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett.63, 1663 (1989). 16

1989
[23]

Ori, Inner structure of a charged black hole: An exact mass-inflation solution, Phys

A. Ori, Inner structure of a charged black hole: An exact mass-inflation solution, Phys. Rev. Lett.67, 789 (1991)

1991
[24]

Ambjørn, A

J. Ambjørn, A. G¨ orlich, J. Jurkiewicz, and R. Loll, Nonperturbative quantum gravity, Physics Reports519, 127–210 (2012)

2012
[25]

Jordan,Globally and locally Causal Dynamical Trian- gulations, Ph.D

S. Jordan,Globally and locally Causal Dynamical Trian- gulations, Ph.D. thesis, Radboud University (2013)

2013
[26]

Hoˇ rava, Quantum gravity at a lifshitz point, Phys

P. Hoˇ rava, Quantum gravity at a lifshitz point, Phys. Rev. D79, 084008 (2009)

2009
[27]

T. P. Sotiriou, Horava-Lifshitz gravity: a status report, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.283, 012034 (2011), arXiv:1010.3218 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2011
[28]

Wang, Hoˇ rava gravity at a lifshitz point: A progress report, International Journal of Modern Physics D26, 1730014 (2017)

A. Wang, Hoˇ rava gravity at a lifshitz point: A progress report, International Journal of Modern Physics D26, 1730014 (2017)

2017
[29]

M. S. Costa, C. A. Herdeiro, J. Penedones, and N. Sousa, Hagedorn transition and chronology protection in string theory, Nuclear Physics B728, 148–178 (2005)

2005
[30]

A. H. Chamseddine and V. Mukhanov, Mimetic dark matter, Journal of High Energy Physics2013, 10.1007/jhep11(2013)135 (2013)

work page doi:10.1007/jhep11(2013)135 2013
[31]

Magueijo, Spacetime symmetry breaking on non- geodesic leaves and a new form of matter, Phys

J. Magueijo, Spacetime symmetry breaking on non- geodesic leaves and a new form of matter, Phys. Rev. D110, 084050 (2024), arXiv:2406.17428 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[32]

Magueijo, Dark matter and spacetime symme- try restoration, Phys

J. Magueijo, Dark matter and spacetime symme- try restoration, Phys. Rev. D109, 124026 (2024), arXiv:2404.15809 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[33]

Bojowald and E

M. Bojowald and E. I. Duque, Emergent modified gravity, Class. Quant. Grav.41, 095008 (2024), arXiv:2404.06375 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[34]

R. M. Wald,General Relativity(University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1984)

1984
[35]

Minguzzi, Lorentzian causality theory, Living Reviews in Relativity22, 1 (2019)

E. Minguzzi, Lorentzian causality theory, Living Reviews in Relativity22, 1 (2019)

2019
[36]

Minguzzi and M

E. Minguzzi and M. Sanchez, The causal hierarchy of spacetimes (2008), arXiv:gr-qc/0609119 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2008
[37]

S. W. Hawking and H. Bondi, The existence of cosmic time functions, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Lon- don. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences308, 433 (1969)

1969
[38]

R. P. Geroch, Topology in general relativity, Journal of Mathematical Physics8, 782 (1967)

1967
[39]

G. T. Horowitz, Topology change in classical and quan- tum gravity, Classical and Quantum Gravity8, 587 (1991)

1991
[40]

Borde, Topology change in classical general relativity (1994), arXiv:gr-qc/9406053 [gr-qc]

A. Borde, Topology change in classical general relativity (1994), arXiv:gr-qc/9406053 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1994
[41]

Borde, H

A. Borde, H. F. Dowker, R. S. Garcia, R. D. Sorkin, and S. Surya, Causal continuity in degenerate spacetimes, Classical and Quantum Gravity16, 3457 (1999)

1999
[42]

Sebastiani, S

L. Sebastiani, S. Vagnozzi, and R. Myrzakulov, Mimetic gravity: A review of recent developments and applica- tions to cosmology and astrophysics, Advances in High Energy Physics2017, 1–43 (2017)

2017
[43]

Einstein-aether theory,

C. Eling, T. Jacobson, and D. Mattingly, Einstein-aether theory (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0410001 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2005
[45]

Nojiri, S

S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, and V. K. Oikonomou, Unimodular-mimetic cosmology, Classical and Quantum Gravity33, 125017 (2016)

2016
[46]

An asymptotically safe guide to quantum gravity and matter

A. Eichhorn, An asymptotically safe guide to quantum gravity and matter, Front. Astron. Space Sci.5, 47 (2019), arXiv:1810.07615 [hep-th]

work page Pith review arXiv 2019
[47]

J. F. Donoghue and G. Menezes, On quadratic gravity, Nuovo Cim. C45, 26 (2022), arXiv:2112.01974 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022
[48]

Bhattacharyya, M

J. Bhattacharyya, M. Colombo, and T. P. Sotiriou, Causality and black holes in spacetimes with a pre- ferred foliation, Class. Quant. Grav.33, 235003 (2016), arXiv:1509.01558 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2016
[49]

Chaudhary, U

H. Chaudhary, U. Debnath, S. K. J. Pacif, N. U. Molla, G. Mustafa, and S. K. Maurya, Observational Con- straints on the Parameters of Hoˇ rava–Lifshitz Gravity, Annalen Phys.536, 2400181 (2024), arXiv:2402.12324 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2024
[50]

Ramos and E

O. Ramos and E. Barausse, Constraints on Hoˇ rava grav- ity from binary black hole observations, Phys. Rev. D 99, 024034 (2019), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 104, 069904 (2021)], arXiv:1811.07786 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2019
[51]

T. P. Sotiriou and S. Liberati, Metric-affine f(r) theories of gravity, Annals of Physics322, 935–966 (2007)

2007
[52]

Vitagliano, T

V. Vitagliano, T. P. Sotiriou, and S. Liberati, The dy- namics of metric-affine gravity, Annals of Physics326, 1259 (2011)

2011
[53]

Iosifidis, Exactly solvable connections in metric-affine gravity, Classical and Quantum Gravity36, 085001 (2019)

D. Iosifidis, Exactly solvable connections in metric-affine gravity, Classical and Quantum Gravity36, 085001 (2019)

2019
[54]

A. N. Bernal, B. Janssen, A. Jim´ enez-Cano, J. A. Orejuela, M. S´ anchez, and P. S´ anchez-Moreno, On the (non-)uniqueness of the levi-civita solution in the ein- stein–hilbert–palatini formalism, Physics Letters B768, 280–287 (2017)

2017
[55]

M. M. Anber, U. Aydemir, and J. F. Donoghue, Break- ing Diffeomorphism Invariance and Tests for the Emer- gence of Gravity, Phys. Rev. D81, 084059 (2010), arXiv:0911.4123 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2010
[56]

A. G. Bello-Morales and A. L. Maroto, Cosmology in gravity models with broken diffeomorphisms, Phys. Rev. D109, 043506 (2024)

2024
[57]

M. M. Anber, U. Aydemir, and J. F. Donoghue, Break- ing diffeomorphism invariance and tests for the emer- gence of gravity, Physical Review D81, 10.1103/phys- revd.81.084059 (2010)

work page doi:10.1103/phys- 2010
[58]

Barcel´ o, R

C. Barcel´ o, R. Carballo-Rubio, L. J. Garay, and G. Garc´ ıa-Moreno, Toward a mechanism for the emergence of gravity, Applied Sciences11, 10.3390/app11188763 (2021)

work page doi:10.3390/app11188763 2021
[59]

Y. F. Pirogov, General covariance violation and the grav- itational dark matter: Scalar graviton, Physics of Atomic Nuclei69, 1338–1344 (2006)

2006
[60]

Jaramillo-Garrido, A

D. Jaramillo-Garrido, A. L. Maroto, and P. Mart´ ın- Moruno, Tdiff in the dark: Gravity with a scalar field invariant under transverse diffeomorphisms (2024), arXiv:2307.14861 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[61]

Nakayama, Weyl transverse diffeomorphism invariant theory of symmetric teleparallel gravity, Classical and Quantum Gravity39, 145006 (2022)

Y. Nakayama, Weyl transverse diffeomorphism invariant theory of symmetric teleparallel gravity, Classical and Quantum Gravity39, 145006 (2022)

2022
[62]

´Alvarez and R

E. ´Alvarez and R. Vidal, Weyl transverse gravity and the cosmological constant, Physical Review D81, 10.1103/physrevd.81.084057 (2010)

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.81.084057 2010
[63]

Carballo-Rubio, L

R. Carballo-Rubio, L. J. Garay, and G. Garc´ ıa-Moreno, Unimodular gravity vs general relativity: a status report, Classical and Quantum Gravity39, 243001 (2022)

2022
[64]

D. R. Finkelstein, A. A. Galiautdinov, and J. E. Baugh, Unimodular relativity and cosmological constant, Jour- nal of Mathematical Physics42, 340–346 (2001). 17

2001
[65]

J. M. Fern´ andez Crist´ obal, Unimodular theory: A little pedagogical vision, Annals of Physics350, 441 (2014)

2014
[66]

´Alvarez and E

E. ´Alvarez and E. Velasco-Aja, A primer on unimodular gravity (2023), arXiv:2301.07641 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[67]

Van Der Bij, H

J. Van Der Bij, H. Van Dam, and Y. J. Ng, The exchange of massless spin-two particles, Physica A: Statistical Me- chanics and its Applications116, 307 (1982)

1982
[68]

´Alvarez, D

E. ´Alvarez, D. Blas, J. Garriga, and E. Verdaguer, Transverse fierz–pauli symmetry, Nuclear Physics B756, 148–170 (2006)

2006
[69]

Y. F. Pirogov, Scalar graviton as dark matter, Phys. Atom. Nuclei78, 528 (2015)

2015
[70]

Weinberg,Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity(John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1972)

S. Weinberg,Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity(John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1972)

1972
[71]

DeBenedictis, Integration in general relativity (1998), arXiv:physics/9802027 [math-ph]

A. DeBenedictis, Integration in general relativity (1998), arXiv:physics/9802027 [math-ph]

work page arXiv 1998