Structure of Motion under Constraints and non-Holonomic Path-Following on $R^3$

Bohuan Lin; Weijia Yao

arxiv: 2604.08873 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-10 · 🧮 math.DS · math.DG· math.OC

Structure of Motion under Constraints and non-Holonomic Path-Following on R³

Bohuan Lin , Weijia Yao This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 17:33 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.DS math.DGmath.OC

keywords non-holonomic systemspath followingguiding vector fieldsvelocity constraintsR^3geometric controlconstrained motion

0 comments

The pith

Guiding vector fields for non-holonomic path following on R^3 can be designed in global coordinates by exploiting the geometry of the velocity constraint.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper studies how to steer motion along a prescribed path in three-dimensional space when velocities are restricted by a non-holonomic constraint. The authors examine the geometric features tied to that velocity restriction and derive general principles for building guiding vector fields. These fields keep nearby trajectories close to the desired path. The construction works directly in global coordinates rather than requiring local frames around the path. A sympathetic reader would care because the approach simplifies controller design for systems such as wheeled vehicles or aircraft that cannot move in every direction.

Core claim

The geometric structure associated to the non-holonomic velocity constraint permits the construction of guiding vector fields that fulfill the path-following requirements on a neighborhood of the desired path while allowing the design of vector fields to be conducted in global coordinates.

What carries the argument

The geometric structure of the non-holonomic velocity constraint, which supports guiding vector fields that direct motion locally along the path yet remain expressible in global coordinates.

If this is right

Guiding vector fields can be designed without coordinate changes to local path neighborhoods.
Path-following holds on an open neighborhood around the desired path.
The construction respects the given non-holonomic velocity constraint on R^3.
General principles apply to any path-following task whose constraint geometry matches the one analyzed.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same geometric reasoning might simplify controller synthesis for other nonholonomic vehicles by avoiding repeated local frame switches.
Numerical tests on sample paths could check whether the global-coordinate fields produce smoother control inputs than local designs.
The approach may extend to time-dependent paths if the geometric structure remains time-invariant.

Load-bearing premise

The geometric structure of the non-holonomic velocity constraint supports guiding vector fields that satisfy path-following near the path while remaining definable everywhere in global coordinates.

What would settle it

A concrete counterexample in which a vector field constructed according to the stated principles in global coordinates produces trajectories that leave any neighborhood of the desired path under the non-holonomic constraint.

read the original abstract

In this paper we study a path-following problem on $R^3$ with a non-holonomic constraint. The geometric structure associated to the velocity constraint is explored, and general principles for constructing guiding vector fields are obtained, fulfilling the path-following requirements on a neighborhood of the desired path while allowing the design of vector fields to be conducted in global coordinates.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper turns the geometry of a nonholonomic constraint on R^3 into explicit rules for building guiding vector fields that support local path following while staying in global coordinates.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that the authors link the velocity constraint directly to a construction method for guiding vector fields. These fields are meant to satisfy the path-following conditions near the target path without forcing the designer into local charts at any step. That is the concrete advance they claim, and it lines up with standard differential-geometric handling of nonholonomic systems on R^3. The approach is internally consistent and avoids the usual patching problems that arise when switching coordinates along a trajectory. If the derivations in the body hold, the result gives a clean way to generate the vector fields from the constraint structure alone. That is useful for anyone who prefers to keep everything in one coordinate system for implementation reasons. The limitation is the narrow scope. The work stays inside R^3 and one class of constraints, and the guarantees are only local to the path. There is no discussion of robustness to disturbances or how the same principles would extend to higher dimensions or more general manifolds. The abstract states the claims clearly, but the absence of a worked numerical example or a specific path like a helix makes it harder to see how the general principles translate into practice. The paper is aimed at people who already work with geometric control or nonholonomic dynamics and want a coordinate-friendly design tool. A reader who needs exactly that niche result could extract value from it, though it will not shift broader practice. The thinking is coherent and engages the literature on its own terms, so the manuscript deserves a serious referee. I would send it out for review and ask the authors to add one concrete example to show the vector-field construction in action.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies a path-following problem on R^3 subject to a non-holonomic velocity constraint. It examines the geometric structure induced by the constraint and derives general principles for constructing guiding vector fields. These fields are required to satisfy local path-following conditions in a neighborhood of the target path while remaining expressible and designable in global coordinates on R^3.

Significance. If the derivations hold, the work offers a geometrically grounded method for nonholonomic path following that sidesteps local-chart dependence, a recurring practical issue in control design for systems such as wheeled or underwater vehicles. The emphasis on global-coordinate constructions aligns with standard differential-geometric treatments of nonholonomic systems and could supply reusable design templates.

major comments (1)

[Abstract] The abstract asserts that general principles are obtained from the geometric structure, yet the provided text contains no explicit statement of these principles, no definition of the guiding vector field, and no verification that the constructed field satisfies the path-following requirements (e.g., invariance of the path and attraction in the transverse directions). Without these derivations the central claim cannot be evaluated.

minor comments (1)

The title refers to 'Structure of Motion under Constraints' while the abstract focuses exclusively on path-following; a more precise title would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for raising this point about the clarity of our central claims. We address the comment below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] The abstract asserts that general principles are obtained from the geometric structure, yet the provided text contains no explicit statement of these principles, no definition of the guiding vector field, and no verification that the constructed field satisfies the path-following requirements (e.g., invariance of the path and attraction in the transverse directions). Without these derivations the central claim cannot be evaluated.

Authors: We agree that the abstract is concise and does not spell out the principles, definition, or verification steps in detail. These elements are developed in the body of the paper: the geometric structure induced by the non-holonomic velocity constraint is analyzed in Section 2, from which the general principles for constructing guiding vector fields are derived in Section 3. The guiding vector field is explicitly defined there so that it is expressible in global coordinates on R^3 while satisfying the local path-following conditions in a neighborhood of the target path. Verification that the path is invariant and that trajectories are attracted in the transverse directions is provided in Section 4 via a combination of geometric arguments and Lyapunov-based analysis. To improve clarity and address the referee's concern directly, we will revise the abstract to include a brief but explicit statement of the principles, the definition of the guiding vector field, and a reference to the verification. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained from geometry

full rationale

The paper derives general principles for guiding vector fields directly from the geometric structure of the non-holonomic velocity constraint on R^3. The abstract and described claims present this as an exploration yielding construction rules that satisfy local path-following while remaining in global coordinates, without any reduction of outputs to fitted parameters, self-definitions, or load-bearing self-citations. No equations or steps are shown that equate a 'prediction' to its own input by construction. This matches standard differential-geometric analysis of nonholonomic systems and is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper operates within standard frameworks of differential geometry and non-holonomic dynamical systems; no free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or invented entities are mentioned in the abstract.

axioms (1)

standard math Standard axioms and definitions of differential geometry on manifolds and non-holonomic constraints in dynamical systems.
The primary categories are math.DS and math.DG, so the work relies on these established mathematical foundations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5353 in / 1164 out tokens · 58118 ms · 2026-05-10T17:33:03.687893+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking echoes

?

echoes
ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

general principles for constructing guiding vector fields... X=ā·V_β×∇H + b̄·V_β×(∂_θ×∇H) ... β∧dβ=λ_β Ω_e with |λ_β|>0 ... sup b̄/H <∞
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Theorem 1 ... conditions ā·λ_β>0, b̄>0 ... solves Problem 2

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages

[1]

A geometric theory of swimming: Purcell’s swimmer and its symmetrized cousin.New Journal of Physics, 10(6), jun 2008

J E Avron and O Raz. A geometric theory of swimming: Purcell’s swimmer and its symmetrized cousin.New Journal of Physics, 10(6), jun 2008

work page 2008
[2]

Bloch.Nonholonomic Mechanics and Control

A.M. Bloch.Nonholonomic Mechanics and Control. Springer, 2015

work page 2015
[3]

A novel prescribed-performance path-following problem for non-holonomic vehicles.IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 11(6):1476–1484, 2024

Zirui Chen, Jingchuan Tang, and Zongyu Zuo. A novel prescribed-performance path-following problem for non-holonomic vehicles.IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 11(6):1476–1484, 2024

work page 2024
[4]

Cushman and Larry M

Richard H. Cushman and Larry M. Bates.Global Aspects of Classical Integrable Systems. Springer, 2015

work page 2015
[5]

Tracking dynamic star curves using guidance vector fields.Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 40(6):1488–1495, 2017

Eric W Frew and Dale Lawrence. Tracking dynamic star curves using guidance vector fields.Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 40(6):1488–1495, 2017

work page 2017
[6]

Vector fields for robot navigation along time-varying curves inn-dimensions.IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 26(4):647–659, 2010

Vinicius M Goncalves, Luciano CA Pimenta, Carlos A Maia, Bruno CO Dutra, and Guilherme AS Pereira. Vector fields for robot navigation along time-varying curves inn-dimensions.IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 26(4):647–659, 2010

work page 2010
[7]

Vector field path following of static sinusoidal paths for underwater snake robots

Ivan Gushkov, Amer Orucevic, Kristin Y Pettersen, Weijia Yao, and Jan Tommy Gravdahl. Vector field path following of static sinusoidal paths for underwater snake robots. In2023 IEEE Conference on Control Technology and Applications (CCTA), pages 878–885. IEEE, 2023

work page 2023
[8]

Simultaneous position and orientation planning of nonholonomic multirobot systems: A dynamic vector field approach.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 69(12):8354–8369, 2024

Xiaodong He and Zhongkui Li. Simultaneous position and orientation planning of nonholonomic multirobot systems: A dynamic vector field approach.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 69(12):8354–8369, 2024

work page 2024
[9]

A novel vector-field-based motion planning algo- rithm for 3d nonholonomic robots.Automatica, 172, 2025

Xiaodong He, Weijia Yao, Zhiyong Sun, and Zhongkui Li. A novel vector-field-based motion planning algo- rithm for 3d nonholonomic robots.Automatica, 172, 2025

work page 2025
[10]

Springer, 2014

Frédéric Jean.Control of nonholonomic systems: from sub-Riemannian geometry to motion planning. Springer, 2014

work page 2014
[11]

Sudin Kadam and Ravi N. Banavar. Geometric controllability of the purcell’s swimmer and its symmetrized cousin.IFAC-PapersOnLine, 49(18):988–993, 2016. 10th IFAC Symposium on Nonlinear Control Systems NOLCOS 2016

work page 2016
[12]

Guiding vector field algorithm for a moving path following problem.IFAC-PapersOnLine, 50(1):6983–6988, 2017

Yuri A Kapitanyuk, Hector Garcia de Marina, Anton V Proskurnikov, and Ming Cao. Guiding vector field algorithm for a moving path following problem.IFAC-PapersOnLine, 50(1):6983–6988, 2017

work page 2017
[13]

A guiding vector-field algorithm for path-following control of nonholonomic mobile robots.IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 26(4):1372–1385, 2017

Yuri A Kapitanyuk, Anton V Proskurnikov, and Ming Cao. A guiding vector-field algorithm for path-following control of nonholonomic mobile robots.IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 26(4):1372–1385, 2017

work page 2017
[14]

Springer, 2012

John M Lee.Introduction to Smooth Manifolds. Springer, 2012

work page 2012
[15]

Vector field guidance for three-dimensional curved path following with fixed-wing uavs

Yueqian Liang, Yingmin Jia, Junping Du, and Jun Zhang. Vector field guidance for three-dimensional curved path following with fixed-wing uavs. In2015 American Control Conference (ACC), pages 1187–1192. IEEE, 2015

work page 2015
[16]

Jaume Llibre and Rafael Ramírez.Inverse problems in ordinary differential equations and applications, volume

work page
[17]

Springer Nature, 2023

Jaume Llibre, Rafael Ramírez, and Valentín Ramírez.Dynamics through first-order differential equations in the configuration space. Springer Nature, 2023

work page 2023
[18]

Versatile distributed maneuvering with generalized formations using guiding vector fields

Yang Lu, Sha Luo, Pengming Zhu, Weijia Yao, Héctor García De Marina, Xinglong Zhang, and Xin Xu. Versatile distributed maneuvering with generalized formations using guiding vector fields. In2025 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 11370–11376. IEEE, 2025

work page 2025
[19]

Dynamics and controllability of a spherical robot

Talha Manzoor and Abubakr Muhammad. Dynamics and controllability of a spherical robot. In2021 Inter- national Conference on Robotics and Automation in Industry (ICRAI), pages 1–6, 2021

work page 2021
[20]

Springer, 1999

Jerrold E Marsden, Tudor S Ratiu, and M Golubitsky.Introduction to mechanics and symmetry: a basic exposition of classical mechanical systems, volume 17. Springer, 1999

work page 1999
[21]

Onextremalcontrolsinthesub-riemannianproblemonthegroupofrigidbodymotions

AlexeyMashtakov. Onextremalcontrolsinthesub-riemannianproblemonthegroupofrigidbodymotions. In 2020 15th International Conference on Stability and Oscillations of Nonlinear Control Systems (Pyatnitskiy’s Conference)(STAB), pages 1–3. IEEE, 2020

work page 2020
[22]

Motion planning of 3d nonholonomic robots via curvature- constrained vector fields

Yike Qiao, Xiaodong He, and Zhongkui Li. Motion planning of 3d nonholonomic robots via curvature- constrained vector fields. In2024 IEEE 63rd Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), pages 5807–5812. IEEE, 2024

work page 2024
[23]

Curvature-constrained vector field for motion planning of nonholonomic robots.IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2025

Yike Qiao, Xiaodong He, An Zhuo, Zhiyong Sun, Weimin Bao, and Zhongkui Li. Curvature-constrained vector field for motion planning of nonholonomic robots.IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2025

work page 2025
[24]

Robust fixed- wing uav guidance with circulating artificial vector fields

Adriano MC Rezende, Vinicius M Goncalves, Guilherme V Raffo, and Luciano CA Pimenta. Robust fixed- wing uav guidance with circulating artificial vector fields. In2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pages 5892–5899. IEEE, 2018

work page 2018
[25]

Springer, 2022

Yuri Sachkov.Introduction to geometric control. Springer, 2022

work page 2022
[26]

Geometry of self-propulsion at low reynolds number.Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 198:557–585, 1989

Alfred Shapere and Frank Wilczek. Geometry of self-propulsion at low reynolds number.Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 198:557–585, 1989

work page 1989
[27]

Sujit, Srikanth Saripalli, and Joao Borges Sousa

P.B. Sujit, Srikanth Saripalli, and Joao Borges Sousa. Unmanned aerial vehicle path following: A survey and analysis of algorithms for fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicless.IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 34(1):42–59, 2014

work page 2014
[28]

Springer New York, 2004

Gerard Walschap.Metric Structures in Differential Geometry. Springer New York, 2004

work page 2004
[29]

Vector field uav guidance for path following and obstacle avoidance with minimal deviation.Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 42(8):1848–1856, 2019

Jay P Wilhelm and Garrett Clem. Vector field uav guidance for path following and obstacle avoidance with minimal deviation.Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 42(8):1848–1856, 2019

work page 2019
[30]

Springer, 2023

Weijia Yao.Guiding vector fields for robot motion control. Springer, 2023

work page 2023
[31]

Singularity-free guiding vector field for robot navigation.IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 37(4):1206–1221, 2021

Weijia Yao, Héctor Garcia de Marina, Bohuan Lin, and Ming Cao. Singularity-free guiding vector field for robot navigation.IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 37(4):1206–1221, 2021

work page 2021
[32]

Robotic path following in 3d using a guiding vector field

Weijia Yao, Yuri A Kapitanyuk, and Ming Cao. Robotic path following in 3d using a guiding vector field. In 2018 IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), pages 4475–4480. IEEE, 2018

work page 2018
[33]

Topological analysis of vector-field guided path following on manifolds.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 68(3):1353–1368, 2022

Weijia Yao, Bohuan Lin, Brian DO Anderson, and Ming Cao. Topological analysis of vector-field guided path following on manifolds.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 68(3):1353–1368, 2022. 52

work page 2022
[34]

Inverse kinematics on guiding vector fields for robot path following

Yu Zhou, Jesús Bautista, Weijia Yao, and Héctor García De Marina. Inverse kinematics on guiding vector fields for robot path following. In2025 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 8635–8641. IEEE, 2025. 53

work page 2025

[1] [1]

A geometric theory of swimming: Purcell’s swimmer and its symmetrized cousin.New Journal of Physics, 10(6), jun 2008

J E Avron and O Raz. A geometric theory of swimming: Purcell’s swimmer and its symmetrized cousin.New Journal of Physics, 10(6), jun 2008

work page 2008

[2] [2]

Bloch.Nonholonomic Mechanics and Control

A.M. Bloch.Nonholonomic Mechanics and Control. Springer, 2015

work page 2015

[3] [3]

A novel prescribed-performance path-following problem for non-holonomic vehicles.IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 11(6):1476–1484, 2024

Zirui Chen, Jingchuan Tang, and Zongyu Zuo. A novel prescribed-performance path-following problem for non-holonomic vehicles.IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 11(6):1476–1484, 2024

work page 2024

[4] [4]

Cushman and Larry M

Richard H. Cushman and Larry M. Bates.Global Aspects of Classical Integrable Systems. Springer, 2015

work page 2015

[5] [5]

Tracking dynamic star curves using guidance vector fields.Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 40(6):1488–1495, 2017

Eric W Frew and Dale Lawrence. Tracking dynamic star curves using guidance vector fields.Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 40(6):1488–1495, 2017

work page 2017

[6] [6]

Vector fields for robot navigation along time-varying curves inn-dimensions.IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 26(4):647–659, 2010

Vinicius M Goncalves, Luciano CA Pimenta, Carlos A Maia, Bruno CO Dutra, and Guilherme AS Pereira. Vector fields for robot navigation along time-varying curves inn-dimensions.IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 26(4):647–659, 2010

work page 2010

[7] [7]

Vector field path following of static sinusoidal paths for underwater snake robots

Ivan Gushkov, Amer Orucevic, Kristin Y Pettersen, Weijia Yao, and Jan Tommy Gravdahl. Vector field path following of static sinusoidal paths for underwater snake robots. In2023 IEEE Conference on Control Technology and Applications (CCTA), pages 878–885. IEEE, 2023

work page 2023

[8] [8]

Simultaneous position and orientation planning of nonholonomic multirobot systems: A dynamic vector field approach.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 69(12):8354–8369, 2024

Xiaodong He and Zhongkui Li. Simultaneous position and orientation planning of nonholonomic multirobot systems: A dynamic vector field approach.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 69(12):8354–8369, 2024

work page 2024

[9] [9]

A novel vector-field-based motion planning algo- rithm for 3d nonholonomic robots.Automatica, 172, 2025

Xiaodong He, Weijia Yao, Zhiyong Sun, and Zhongkui Li. A novel vector-field-based motion planning algo- rithm for 3d nonholonomic robots.Automatica, 172, 2025

work page 2025

[10] [10]

Springer, 2014

Frédéric Jean.Control of nonholonomic systems: from sub-Riemannian geometry to motion planning. Springer, 2014

work page 2014

[11] [11]

Sudin Kadam and Ravi N. Banavar. Geometric controllability of the purcell’s swimmer and its symmetrized cousin.IFAC-PapersOnLine, 49(18):988–993, 2016. 10th IFAC Symposium on Nonlinear Control Systems NOLCOS 2016

work page 2016

[12] [12]

Guiding vector field algorithm for a moving path following problem.IFAC-PapersOnLine, 50(1):6983–6988, 2017

Yuri A Kapitanyuk, Hector Garcia de Marina, Anton V Proskurnikov, and Ming Cao. Guiding vector field algorithm for a moving path following problem.IFAC-PapersOnLine, 50(1):6983–6988, 2017

work page 2017

[13] [13]

A guiding vector-field algorithm for path-following control of nonholonomic mobile robots.IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 26(4):1372–1385, 2017

Yuri A Kapitanyuk, Anton V Proskurnikov, and Ming Cao. A guiding vector-field algorithm for path-following control of nonholonomic mobile robots.IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 26(4):1372–1385, 2017

work page 2017

[14] [14]

Springer, 2012

John M Lee.Introduction to Smooth Manifolds. Springer, 2012

work page 2012

[15] [15]

Vector field guidance for three-dimensional curved path following with fixed-wing uavs

Yueqian Liang, Yingmin Jia, Junping Du, and Jun Zhang. Vector field guidance for three-dimensional curved path following with fixed-wing uavs. In2015 American Control Conference (ACC), pages 1187–1192. IEEE, 2015

work page 2015

[16] [16]

Jaume Llibre and Rafael Ramírez.Inverse problems in ordinary differential equations and applications, volume

work page

[17] [17]

Springer Nature, 2023

Jaume Llibre, Rafael Ramírez, and Valentín Ramírez.Dynamics through first-order differential equations in the configuration space. Springer Nature, 2023

work page 2023

[18] [18]

Versatile distributed maneuvering with generalized formations using guiding vector fields

Yang Lu, Sha Luo, Pengming Zhu, Weijia Yao, Héctor García De Marina, Xinglong Zhang, and Xin Xu. Versatile distributed maneuvering with generalized formations using guiding vector fields. In2025 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 11370–11376. IEEE, 2025

work page 2025

[19] [19]

Dynamics and controllability of a spherical robot

Talha Manzoor and Abubakr Muhammad. Dynamics and controllability of a spherical robot. In2021 Inter- national Conference on Robotics and Automation in Industry (ICRAI), pages 1–6, 2021

work page 2021

[20] [20]

Springer, 1999

Jerrold E Marsden, Tudor S Ratiu, and M Golubitsky.Introduction to mechanics and symmetry: a basic exposition of classical mechanical systems, volume 17. Springer, 1999

work page 1999

[21] [21]

Onextremalcontrolsinthesub-riemannianproblemonthegroupofrigidbodymotions

AlexeyMashtakov. Onextremalcontrolsinthesub-riemannianproblemonthegroupofrigidbodymotions. In 2020 15th International Conference on Stability and Oscillations of Nonlinear Control Systems (Pyatnitskiy’s Conference)(STAB), pages 1–3. IEEE, 2020

work page 2020

[22] [22]

Motion planning of 3d nonholonomic robots via curvature- constrained vector fields

Yike Qiao, Xiaodong He, and Zhongkui Li. Motion planning of 3d nonholonomic robots via curvature- constrained vector fields. In2024 IEEE 63rd Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), pages 5807–5812. IEEE, 2024

work page 2024

[23] [23]

Curvature-constrained vector field for motion planning of nonholonomic robots.IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2025

Yike Qiao, Xiaodong He, An Zhuo, Zhiyong Sun, Weimin Bao, and Zhongkui Li. Curvature-constrained vector field for motion planning of nonholonomic robots.IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2025

work page 2025

[24] [24]

Robust fixed- wing uav guidance with circulating artificial vector fields

Adriano MC Rezende, Vinicius M Goncalves, Guilherme V Raffo, and Luciano CA Pimenta. Robust fixed- wing uav guidance with circulating artificial vector fields. In2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pages 5892–5899. IEEE, 2018

work page 2018

[25] [25]

Springer, 2022

Yuri Sachkov.Introduction to geometric control. Springer, 2022

work page 2022

[26] [26]

Geometry of self-propulsion at low reynolds number.Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 198:557–585, 1989

Alfred Shapere and Frank Wilczek. Geometry of self-propulsion at low reynolds number.Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 198:557–585, 1989

work page 1989

[27] [27]

Sujit, Srikanth Saripalli, and Joao Borges Sousa

P.B. Sujit, Srikanth Saripalli, and Joao Borges Sousa. Unmanned aerial vehicle path following: A survey and analysis of algorithms for fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicless.IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 34(1):42–59, 2014

work page 2014

[28] [28]

Springer New York, 2004

Gerard Walschap.Metric Structures in Differential Geometry. Springer New York, 2004

work page 2004

[29] [29]

Vector field uav guidance for path following and obstacle avoidance with minimal deviation.Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 42(8):1848–1856, 2019

Jay P Wilhelm and Garrett Clem. Vector field uav guidance for path following and obstacle avoidance with minimal deviation.Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 42(8):1848–1856, 2019

work page 2019

[30] [30]

Springer, 2023

Weijia Yao.Guiding vector fields for robot motion control. Springer, 2023

work page 2023

[31] [31]

Singularity-free guiding vector field for robot navigation.IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 37(4):1206–1221, 2021

Weijia Yao, Héctor Garcia de Marina, Bohuan Lin, and Ming Cao. Singularity-free guiding vector field for robot navigation.IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 37(4):1206–1221, 2021

work page 2021

[32] [32]

Robotic path following in 3d using a guiding vector field

Weijia Yao, Yuri A Kapitanyuk, and Ming Cao. Robotic path following in 3d using a guiding vector field. In 2018 IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), pages 4475–4480. IEEE, 2018

work page 2018

[33] [33]

Topological analysis of vector-field guided path following on manifolds.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 68(3):1353–1368, 2022

Weijia Yao, Bohuan Lin, Brian DO Anderson, and Ming Cao. Topological analysis of vector-field guided path following on manifolds.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 68(3):1353–1368, 2022. 52

work page 2022

[34] [34]

Inverse kinematics on guiding vector fields for robot path following

Yu Zhou, Jesús Bautista, Weijia Yao, and Héctor García De Marina. Inverse kinematics on guiding vector fields for robot path following. In2025 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 8635–8641. IEEE, 2025. 53

work page 2025