pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.09943 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-10 · 💻 cs.LG · nlin.CD· physics.data-an

Vestibular reservoir computing

Smita Deb , Shirin Panahi , Mulugeta Haile , Ying-Cheng Lai This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.LG nlin.CDphysics.data-an
keywords reservoir computinguncoupled topologyvestibular systemmemory capacityphysical implementationnonlinear dynamics
0
0 comments X

The pith

A vestibular-inspired uncoupled reservoir topology matches the performance of fully coupled networks.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes a reservoir computing approach inspired by the biological vestibular system to simplify physical hardware realizations. It introduces a designed uncoupled topology that achieves comparable performance to traditional fully coupled reservoirs. Theoretical derivations show that for linear reservoirs, memory capacity can be equivalent under specific conditions between the two topologies. These results approximately extend to nonlinear systems as well. The work also analyzes how reservoir size influences predictive statistics and memory capacity.

Core claim

The paper claims that a designed uncoupled topology in reservoir computing, inspired by the vestibular system, yields performance comparable to fully coupled networks. For linear reservoirs, a derived memory capacity formula identifies conditions where both topologies have equivalent memory. These analytical findings approximately hold for nonlinear reservoir systems, suggesting uncoupled architectures as a practical pathway for physical implementations.

What carries the argument

The designed uncoupled topology, which reduces complex interconnectivity while maintaining memory capacity equivalent to coupled networks under derived conditions.

If this is right

  • Uncoupled reservoir architectures offer a mathematically sound path for efficient physical reservoir computing.
  • Memory capacity equivalence between uncoupled and coupled topologies holds for linear reservoirs under specific conditions.
  • The equivalence approximately applies to nonlinear reservoir systems.
  • Reservoir size systematically affects predictive statistics and memory capacity.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This approach could facilitate hardware implementations in systems where full coupling is difficult to achieve physically.
  • The conditions for memory equivalence might be used to design other simplified reservoir topologies.
  • Extending the analysis to specific physical platforms could reveal additional practical benefits or limitations.

Load-bearing premise

That the equivalence in memory capacity derived for linear reservoirs approximately holds for nonlinear systems and that the uncoupled topology can be physically realized without unforeseen complexities.

What would settle it

A physical experiment implementing both topologies and measuring a substantial difference in memory capacity or prediction accuracy would falsify the claim of comparability.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.09943 by Mulugeta Haile, Shirin Panahi, Smita Deb, Ying-Cheng Lai.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic representation of the proposed vestibular [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Performance comparison of coupled and uncoupled vestibular reservoir computers for Lorenz and chaotic food-chain [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Short-term predictive performance of coupled and uncoupled vestibular reservoir computers. The plots show the mean [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Predictive statistics of coupled and uncoupled vestibular reservoir computers. The plots display the Kullback-Leibler [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Methods for calculating the memory function. (a) A scalar stochastic signal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: displays the memory function MF (τ ) de￾rived theoretically [Eq. (8)] alongside simulation results [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: displays the memory function MF (τ ) for cou￾pled and uncoupled reservoirs. Panels (a,c) and (b,d) utilize hyperparameter values trained on the Lorenz and chaotic food-chain systems, respectively. Specifically, in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Reservoir computing (RC) is a computational framework known for its training efficiency, making it ideal for physical hardware implementations. However, realizing the complex interconnectivity of traditional reservoirs in physical systems remains a significant challenge. This paper proposes a physical RC scheme inspired by the biological vestibular system. To overcome hardware complexity, we introduce a designed uncoupled topology and demonstrate that it achieves performance comparable to fully coupled networks. We theoretically analyze the difference between these topologies by deriving a memory capacity formula for linear reservoirs, identifying specific conditions where both configurations yield equivalent memory. These analytical results are demonstrated to approximately hold for nonlinear reservoir systems. Furthermore, we systematically examine the impact of reservoir size on predictive statistics and memory capacity. Our findings suggest that uncoupled reservoir architectures offer a mathematically sound and practically feasible pathway for efficient physical reservoir computing.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a vestibular-inspired reservoir computing (RC) scheme that uses a designed uncoupled topology to reduce hardware interconnectivity challenges while claiming performance comparable to fully coupled networks. It derives an exact memory capacity formula for linear reservoirs, identifies conditions for equivalence between topologies, demonstrates that these conditions approximately hold for nonlinear systems, and examines the effects of reservoir size on predictive statistics and memory capacity.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work provides a practical pathway for simplifying physical RC implementations by replacing dense coupling with a designed uncoupled architecture, which is valuable for hardware-constrained applications. The explicit linear memory-capacity derivation is a clear analytical strength that grounds the equivalence claim in closed-form conditions rather than empirical fitting.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4] §4 (theoretical analysis) and the subsequent nonlinear validation: the memory-capacity equivalence is derived exactly for linear reservoirs, but the claim that the same conditions 'approximately hold' for the nonlinear vestibular model (with saturating nonlinearities) is not supported by any quantitative bound, scaling argument, or deviation metric between linear and nonlinear memory capacity; without this, the performance-comparability result for the physically relevant case remains unsecured.
  2. [Experimental section] Experimental section (nonlinear reservoir systems): the approximate validation for nonlinear cases reports comparable performance but provides no error analysis, confidence intervals, or systematic comparison of memory-capacity deviation as a function of nonlinearity strength or operating regime, leaving the extrapolation from the linear derivation unverified in detail.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Methods] The notation for the designed uncoupled topology (e.g., the specific connectivity matrix or coupling parameters) should be introduced with an explicit equation or diagram in the methods section for reproducibility.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions and axis labels for memory-capacity plots could more clearly distinguish linear analytical curves from nonlinear simulation results.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their insightful comments, which help improve the clarity and rigor of our work on vestibular reservoir computing. We address each major comment below and outline the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4] §4 (theoretical analysis) and the subsequent nonlinear validation: the memory-capacity equivalence is derived exactly for linear reservoirs, but the claim that the same conditions 'approximately hold' for the nonlinear vestibular model (with saturating nonlinearities) is not supported by any quantitative bound, scaling argument, or deviation metric between linear and nonlinear memory capacity; without this, the performance-comparability result for the physically relevant case remains unsecured.

    Authors: We agree that providing a quantitative bound or deviation metric would strengthen the claim for nonlinear systems. The exact derivation for linear cases identifies the conditions (e.g., specific eigenvalue distributions or coupling parameters) under which equivalence holds. For nonlinear cases, the vestibular model with saturating nonlinearities approximates these conditions sufficiently for practical purposes, as evidenced by our simulation results showing similar memory capacities and prediction errors. However, to address the concern rigorously, in the revised manuscript we will add a quantitative analysis, including a scaling argument based on perturbation theory around the linear regime and numerical metrics of deviation (e.g., relative error in memory capacity) as a function of nonlinearity strength. This will better secure the performance-comparability result. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Experimental section] Experimental section (nonlinear reservoir systems): the approximate validation for nonlinear cases reports comparable performance but provides no error analysis, confidence intervals, or systematic comparison of memory-capacity deviation as a function of nonlinearity strength or operating regime, leaving the extrapolation from the linear derivation unverified in detail.

    Authors: The referee correctly points out the lack of statistical analysis in the experimental validation. Our current results show comparable performance through direct comparisons of memory capacity and prediction accuracy, but without error bars or systematic sweeps. We will revise the experimental section to include: (1) multiple independent runs with standard error and confidence intervals for all reported metrics; (2) additional figures plotting memory capacity deviation versus nonlinearity strength (e.g., varying the saturation parameter) and operating regime (e.g., input amplitude); (3) a table summarizing the conditions under which the approximation holds within a specified tolerance. These additions will provide the detailed verification requested. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: linear memory-capacity derivation is independent and self-contained

full rationale

The paper's core derivation computes an exact memory-capacity formula for linear reservoirs by applying standard echo-state and linear-algebra techniques to the state-update equations of the two topologies, then algebraically identifies the parameter conditions under which the capacities coincide. This step is a direct mathematical reduction from the reservoir dynamics and does not rely on fitted parameters, self-citations, or prior results from the same authors. The subsequent statement that the equivalence 'approximately holds' for nonlinear systems is presented as a numerical observation rather than a claimed theorem, introducing no definitional loop or renaming of known results. No load-bearing premise collapses to an input by construction, and the analysis remains externally falsifiable against linear RC benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work builds on standard reservoir computing theory and linear system analysis; no new free parameters, ad hoc axioms, or invented entities are introduced in the abstract description.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Linear reservoir dynamics permit closed-form derivation of memory capacity
    Invoked to derive the formula comparing coupled and uncoupled topologies.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5439 in / 1149 out tokens · 32109 ms · 2026-05-10T16:46:57.254414+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

117 extracted references · 117 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    This matrix is then used to compute the predicted signal [see Eqs

    Analysis of memory capacity for linear reservoir networks To quantitatively define memory capacity, we recall that the training objective is to fit an output matrix via ridge regression using the target signal. This matrix is then used to compute the predicted signal [see Eqs. (15) and (16) inMethods]. All information regarding the target signal within th...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Panels (a,c) and (b,d) utilize hyperparameter values trained on the Lorenz and chaotic food-chain systems, respectively

    Memory capacity of the vestibular reservoir computer Figure 7 displays the memory function M F (τ) for cou- pled and uncoupled reservoirs. Panels (a,c) and (b,d) utilize hyperparameter values trained on the Lorenz and chaotic food-chain systems, respectively. Specifically, in Fig. 7(a), the baseline model is the coupled reservoir com- puter, with its memo...

    work page

  3. [3]

    mirror attractors

    for the two chaotic target systems. The external input u= [u 1, u2, u3]⊺, obtained by solving the Lorenz system [Eq. (12)] or the chaotic food-chain model [Eq. (13)], is a sequence of lengthL transient +L train +L validation. This sequence is fed into the reservoir described by: ˙r=τf(r,u), 12 whereτdenotes the time constant,r∈ R N represents the reservoi...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Maass, T

    W. Maass, T. Natschl¨ ager, and H. Markram, Real-time computing without stable states: A new framework for neural computation based on perturbations, Neural Comput.14, 2531 (2002)

    work page 2002

  5. [5]

    Jaeger and H

    H. Jaeger and H. Haas, Harnessing nonlinearity: Pre- dicting chaotic systems and saving energy in wireless communication, science304, 78 (2004)

    work page 2004

  6. [6]

    Lukoˇ seviˇ cius and H

    M. Lukoˇ seviˇ cius and H. Jaeger, Reservoir computing approaches to recurrent neural network training, Com- puter science review3, 127 (2009)

    work page 2009

  7. [7]

    Manjunath and H

    G. Manjunath and H. Jaeger, Echo state property linked to an input: Exploring a fundamental characteristic of recurrent neural networks, Neur. Comp.25, 671 (2013)

    work page 2013

  8. [8]

    Pathak, Z

    J. Pathak, Z. Lu, B. Hunt, M. Girvan, and E. Ott, Using machine learning to replicate chaotic attractors and calculate Lyapunov exponents from data, Chaos27, 121102 (2017)

    work page 2017

  9. [9]

    Pathak, B

    J. Pathak, B. Hunt, M. Girvan, Z. Lu, and E. Ott, Model-free prediction of large spatiotemporally chaotic systems from data: A reservoir computing approach, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 024102 (2018)

    work page 2018

  10. [10]

    Jiang and Y.-C

    J. Jiang and Y.-C. Lai, Model-free prediction of spa- tiotemporal dynamical systems with recurrent neural networks: Role of network spectral radius, Phys. Rev. Research1, 033056 (2019)

    work page 2019

  11. [11]

    C. Klos, Y. F. K. Kossio, S. Goedeke, A. Gilra, and R.- M. Memmesheimer, Dynamical learning of dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 088103 (2020)

    work page 2020

  12. [12]

    Patel, D

    D. Patel, D. Canaday, M. Girvan, A. Pomerance, and E. Ott, Using machine learning to predict statisti- cal properties of non-stationary dynamical processes: System climate, regime transitions, and the effect of stochasticity, Chaos31, 033149 (2021)

    work page 2021

  13. [13]

    E. Bollt, On explaining the surprising success of reser- voir computing forecaster of chaos? the universal ma- chine learning dynamical system with contrast to var and dmd, Chaos31, 013108 (2021)

    work page 2021

  14. [14]

    D. J. Gauthier, E. Bollt, A. Griffith, and W. A. Bar- bosa, Next generation reservoir computing, Nat. Com- mun.12, 1 (2021)

    work page 2021

  15. [15]

    Parlitz, Learning from the past: reservoir comput- ing using delayed variables, Frontiers in Applied Math- ematics and Statistics10, 10.3389/fams.2024.1221051 (2024)

    U. Parlitz, Learning from the past: reservoir comput- ing using delayed variables, Frontiers in Applied Math- ematics and Statistics10, 10.3389/fams.2024.1221051 (2024)

    work page doi:10.3389/fams.2024.1221051 2024

  16. [16]

    Vlachas, J

    P.-R. Vlachas, J. Pathak, B. R. Hunt, T. P. Sapsis, M. Girvan, E. Ott, and P. Koumoutsakos, Backprop- agation algorithms and reservoir computing in recur- rent neural networks for the forecasting of complex spa- tiotemporal dynamics, Neural Netw.126, 191 (2020)

    work page 2020

  17. [17]

    Verstraeten, B

    D. Verstraeten, B. Schrauwen, M. D’Haene, and D. Stroobandt, An experimental unification of reservoir computing methods, Neural Netw.20, 391 (2007), echo State Networks and Liquid State Machines

    work page 2007

  18. [18]

    Kong, H.-W

    L.-W. Kong, H.-W. Fan, C. Grebogi, and Y.-C. Lai, Machine learning prediction of critical transition and system collapse, Phys. Rev. Research3, 013090 (2021)

    work page 2021

  19. [19]

    Kong, H.-W

    L.-W. Kong, H.-W. Fan, C. Grebogi, and Y.-C. Lai, Emergence of transient chaos and intermittency in ma- chine learning, J. Phys. Complex.2, 035014 (2021)

    work page 2021

  20. [20]

    Panahi, L.-W

    S. Panahi, L.-W. Kong, M. Moradi, Z.-M. Zhai, B. Glaz, M. Haile, and Y.-C. Lai, Machine learning prediction of tipping in complex dynamical systems, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 043194 (2024)

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    Tanaka, T

    G. Tanaka, T. Yamane, J. B. H´ eroux, R. Nakane, N. Kanazawa, S. Takeda, H. Numata, D. Nakano, and A. Hirose, Recent advances in physical reservoir com- puting: A review, Neu. Net.115, 100 (2019)

    work page 2019

  22. [22]

    Nakajima, Physical reservoir computing—an intro- ductory perspective, Jpn

    K. Nakajima, Physical reservoir computing—an intro- ductory perspective, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.59, 060501 (2020)

    work page 2020

  23. [23]

    Nakajima and I

    K. Nakajima and I. Fischer,Reservoir computing, edited by R. A. Meyers (Springer Singapore, Singapore, 2021)

    work page 2021

  24. [24]

    Stepney, Physical reservoir computing: a tutorial, Natural Computing , 1 (2024)

    S. Stepney, Physical reservoir computing: a tutorial, Natural Computing , 1 (2024)

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    Zhang and D

    H. Zhang and D. V. Vargas, A survey on reservoir computing and its interdisciplinary applications be- yond traditional machine learning, IEEE Access11, 81033–81070 (2023)

    work page 2023

  26. [26]

    Appeltant, M

    L. Appeltant, M. C. Soriano, G. Van der Sande, J. Danckaert, S. Massar, J. Dambre, B. Schrauwen, C. R. Mirasso, and I. Fischer, Information processing using a single dynamical node as complex system, Na- ture communications2, 468 (2011)

    work page 2011

  27. [27]

    Mor´ an, V

    A. Mor´ an, V. Canals, F. Galan-Prado, C. F. Frasser, D. Radhakrishnan, S. Safavi, and J. L. Rossell´ o, Hardware-optimized reservoir computing system for edge intelligence applications, Cognitive Computation , 1 (2023)

    work page 2023

  28. [28]

    Milano, G

    G. Milano, G. Pedretti, K. Montano, S. Ricci, S. Hashemkhani, L. Boarino, D. Ielmini, and C. Riccia- rdi, In materia reservoir computing with a fully memris- tive architecture based on self-organizing nanowire net- works, Nature materials21, 195 (2022)

    work page 2022

  29. [29]

    Zhong, J

    Y. Zhong, J. Tang, X. Li, X. Liang, Z. Liu, Y. Li, Y. Xi, P. Yao, Z. Hao, B. Gao,et al., A memristor-based analogue reservoir computing system for real-time and power-efficient signal processing, Nature Electronics5, 672 (2022)

    work page 2022

  30. [30]

    M. M. Rajib, W. Al Misba, M. F. F. Chowdhury, M. S. Alam, and J. Atulasimha, Skyrmion based energy-efficient straintronic physical reservoir comput- ing, Neuromorphic Computing and Engineering2, 044011 (2022)

    work page 2022

  31. [31]

    Liang, J

    X. Liang, J. Tang, Y. Zhong, B. Gao, H. Qian, and H. Wu, Physical reservoir computing with emerging electronics, Nature Electronics7, 193 (2024)

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    Larger, A

    L. Larger, A. Bayl´ on-Fuentes, R. Martinenghi, V. S. Udaltsov, Y. K. Chembo, and M. Jacquot, High-speed photonic reservoir computing using a time-delay-based architecture: Million words per second classification, Phys. Rev. X7, 011015 (2017)

    work page 2017

  33. [33]

    W. Du, C. Li, Y. Huang, J. Zou, L. Luo, C. Teng, H.-C. Kuo, J. Wu, and Z. Wang, An optoelectronic reservoir computing for temporal information processing, IEEE Electron Device Letters43, 406 (2022)

    work page 2022

  34. [34]

    Picco, A

    E. Picco, A. Lupo, and S. Massar, Deep photonic reser- voir computer for speech recognition, IEEE Transac- tions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems (2024)

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    Wang and F

    X. Wang and F. Cichos, Harnessing synthetic active par- ticles for physical reservoir computing, Nature Commu- nications15, 774 (2024). 14

    work page 2024

  36. [36]

    Abbas, H

    A. Abbas, H. Abdel-Ghani, and I. S. Maksymov, Clas- sical and quantum physical reservoir computing for on- board artificial intelligence systems: A perspective, Dy- namics4, 643 (2024)

    work page 2024

  37. [37]

    Palacios, R

    A. Palacios, R. Mart´ ınez-Pe˜ na, M. C. Soriano, G. L. Giorgi, and R. Zambrini, Role of coherence in many- body quantum reservoir computing, Communications Physics7, 369 (2024)

    work page 2024

  38. [38]

    C. Zhu, P. J. Ehlers, H. I. Nurdin, and D. Soh, Practical few-atom quantum reservoir computing (2024)

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    M. C. Soriano, D. Brunner, M. Escalona-Mor ˜A¡n, C. R. Mirasso, and I. Fischer, Minimal approach to neuro- inspired information processing, Frontiers in Com- putational Neuroscience9, 10.3389/fncom.2015.00068 (2015)

    work page doi:10.3389/fncom.2015.00068 2015

  40. [40]

    Cucchi, C

    M. Cucchi, C. Gruener, L. Petrauskas, P. Steiner, H. Tseng, A. Fischer, B. Penkovsky, C. Matthus, P. Birkholz, H. Kleemann, and K. Leo, Reservoir com- puting with biocompatible organic electrochemical net- works for brain-inspired biosignal classification, Science Advances7, eabh0693 (2021)

    work page 2021

  41. [41]

    Illeperuma, R

    M. Illeperuma, R. Pina, V. De Silva, and X. Liu, Novel directions for neuromorphic machine intelligence guided by functional connectivity: A review, Machines12, 574 (2024)

    work page 2024

  42. [42]

    He and P

    S. He and P. Musgrave, Physical reservoir computing on a soft bio-inspired swimmer, Neural Networks181, 106766 (2025)

    work page 2025

  43. [43]

    Cucchi, S

    M. Cucchi, S. Abreu, G. Ciccone, D. Brunner, and H. Kleemann, Hands-on reservoir computing: a tutorial for practical implementation, Neuromorphic Computing and Engineering2, 032002 (2022)

    work page 2022

  44. [44]

    Schrauwen, D

    B. Schrauwen, D. Verstraeten, and J. Van Campenhout, An overview of reservoir computing: theory, applica- tions and implementations, inProceedings of the 15th European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks. p. 471-482 2007(2007) pp. 471–482

    work page 2007

  45. [45]

    H. Ma, D. Prosperino, and C. R¨ ath, A novel approach to minimal reservoir computing, Scientific Reports13, 10.1038/s41598-023-39886-w (2023)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-023-39886-w 2023

  46. [46]

    Gonon, L

    L. Gonon, L. Grigoryeva, and J.-P. Ortega, Infinite- dimensional reservoir computing, Neural Networks179, 106486 (2024)

    work page 2024

  47. [47]

    N. D. Haynes, M. C. Soriano, D. P. Rosin, I. Fischer, and D. J. Gauthier, Reservoir computing with a single time-delay autonomous Boolean node, Phys. Rev. E91, 020801 (2015)

    work page 2015

  48. [48]

    G. Dion, S. Mejaouri, and J. Sylvestre, Reservoir com- puting with a single delay-coupled non-linear mechani- cal oscillator, Journal of Applied Physics124(2018)

    work page 2018

  49. [49]

    J. Li, C. Zhao, K. Hamedani, and Y. Yi, Analog hard- ware implementation of spike-based delayed feedback reservoir computing system, in2017 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN)(IEEE, 2017) pp. 3439–3446

    work page 2017

  50. [50]

    Q. H. Tran and K. Nakajima, Higher-order quantum reservoir computing (2020)

    work page 2020

  51. [51]

    Boshgazi, A

    S. Boshgazi, A. Jabbari, K. Mehrany, and M. Memarian, Virtual reservoir computer using an optical resonator, Optical Materials Express12, 1140 (2022)

    work page 2022

  52. [52]

    Nichele and A

    S. Nichele and A. Molund, Deep learning with cellu- lar automaton-based reservoir computing, Complex Sys- tems26, 319–340 (2017)

    work page 2017

  53. [53]

    Goudarzi, M

    A. Goudarzi, M. R. Lakin, and D. Stefanovic, Dna reser- voir computing: a novel molecular computing approach, inInternational Workshop on DNA-Based Computers (Springer, 2013) pp. 76–89

    work page 2013

  54. [54]

    Jaurigue, Chaotic attractor reconstruction using small reservoirs—the influence of topology, Machine Learning: Science and Technology5, 035058 (2024)

    L. Jaurigue, Chaotic attractor reconstruction using small reservoirs—the influence of topology, Machine Learning: Science and Technology5, 035058 (2024)

    work page 2024

  55. [55]

    Jaeger, Short term memory in echo state networks, GMD Forschungszentrum Informationstechnik (2001)

    H. Jaeger, Short term memory in echo state networks, GMD Forschungszentrum Informationstechnik (2001)

    work page 2001

  56. [56]

    T. L. Carroll, Optimizing memory in reservoir comput- ers, Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science32(2022)

    work page 2022

  57. [57]

    Dambre, D

    J. Dambre, D. Verstraeten, B. Schrauwen, and S. Mas- sar, Information processing capacity of dynamical sys- tems, Scientific reports2, 514 (2012)

    work page 2012

  58. [58]

    H. Ma, D. Prosperino, A. Haluszczynski, and C. R¨ ath, Efficient forecasting of chaotic systems with block- diagonal and binary reservoir computing, Chaos: An In- terdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science33(2023)

    work page 2023

  59. [59]

    E. N. Lorenz, Deterministic nonperiodic flow, J. Atmos. Sci.20, 130 (1963)

    work page 1963

  60. [60]

    Hastings and T

    A. Hastings and T. Powell, Chaos in a three-species food chain, Ecology72, 896 (1991)

    work page 1991

  61. [61]

    McCann and P

    K. McCann and P. Yodzis, Nonlinear dynamics and population disappearances, Ame. Naturalist144, 873 (1994)

    work page 1994

  62. [62]

    S. M. Highstein, R. R. Fay, and A. N. Popper,The vestibular system, Vol. 24 (Springer, 2004)

    work page 2004

  63. [63]

    J. M. Goldberg,The vestibular system: a sixth sense (Oxford University Press, USA, 2012)

    work page 2012

  64. [64]

    Khan and R

    S. Khan and R. Chang, Anatomy of the vestibular sys- tem: a review, NeuroRehabilitation32, 437 (2013)

    work page 2013

  65. [65]

    K. E. Cullen, Vestibular processing during natural self- motion: implications for perception and action, Nature Reviews Neuroscience20, 346 (2019)

    work page 2019

  66. [66]

    Hudspeth and R

    A. Hudspeth and R. Jacobs, Stereocilia mediate trans- duction in vertebrate hair cells (auditory system/cil- ium/vestibular system)., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences76, 1506 (1979)

    work page 1979

  67. [67]

    P. Guth, P. Perin, C. Norris, and P. Valli, The vestibu- lar hair cells: post-transductional signal processing, Progress in neurobiology54, 193 (1998)

    work page 1998

  68. [68]

    Wall Iii, D

    C. Wall Iii, D. Merfeld, S. Rauch, and F. Black, Vestibu- lar prostheses: the engineering and biomedical issues, Journal of Vestibular Research12, 95 (2003)

    work page 2003

  69. [69]

    S. A. Moshizi, C. J. Pastras, R. Sharma, M. P. Mah- mud, R. Ryan, A. Razmjou, and M. Asadnia, Recent advancements in bioelectronic devices to interface with the peripheral vestibular system, Biosensors and Bio- electronics214, 114521 (2022)

    work page 2022

  70. [70]

    Lacour and L

    M. Lacour and L. Borel, Vestibular control of posture and gait., Archives Italiennes de Biologie131, 81 (1993)

    work page 1993

  71. [71]

    S. L. Whitney, G. F. Marchetti, M. Pritcher, and J. M. Furman, Gaze stabilization and gait performance in vestibular dysfunction, Gait & posture29, 194 (2009)

    work page 2009

  72. [72]

    Fransson, A

    P.-A. Fransson, A. Hafstrom, M. Karlberg, M. Mag- nusson, A. Tjader, and R. Johansson, Postural con- trol adaptation during galvanic vestibular and vibra- tory proprioceptive stimulation, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering50, 1310 (2003)

    work page 2003

  73. [73]

    Patane, C

    F. Patane, C. Laschi, H. Miwa, E. Guglielmelli, P. Dario, and A. Takanishi, Design and development of a biologically-inspired artificial vestibular system for robot heads, in2004 IEEE/RSJ International Confer- 15 ence on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)(IEEE Cat. No. 04CH37566), Vol. 2 (IEEE, 2004) pp. 1317– 1322

    work page 2004

  74. [74]

    Tin and C.-S

    C. Tin and C.-S. Poon, Internal models in sensorimotor integration: perspectives from adaptive control theory, Journal of Neural Engineering2, S147 (2005)

    work page 2005

  75. [75]

    Mergner, G

    T. Mergner, G. Schweigart, and L. Fennell, Vestibular humanoid postural control, Journal of Physiology-Paris 103, 178–194 (2009)

    work page 2009

  76. [76]

    S. L. Whitney, A. H. Alghadir, and S. Anwer, Recent evidence about the effectiveness of vestibular rehabil- itation, Current treatment options in neurology18, 1 (2016)

    work page 2016

  77. [77]

    Sulway and S

    S. Sulway and S. L. Whitney, Advances in vestibular rehabilitation, Vestibular Disorders82, 164 (2019)

    work page 2019

  78. [78]

    C. F. Santos, J. Belinha, F. Gentil, M. Parente, B. Areias, and R. N. Jorge, Biomechanical study of the vestibular system of the inner ear using a numer- ical method, Procedia IUTAM24, 30 (2017)

    work page 2017

  79. [79]

    A. Q. Momani and F. M. Cardullo, A review of the recent literature on the mathematical modeling of the vestibular system, in2018 AIAA Modeling and Simu- lation Technologies Conference(American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2018)

    work page 2018

  80. [80]

    W. Steinhausen, Ueber die beobachtung der cupula in den bogengangsampullen des labyrinths des lebenden hechts., Pfl¨ ugers Archiv f¨ ur die gesamte Physiologie des Menschen und der Tiere (1933)

    work page 1933

Showing first 80 references.