pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.10109 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-11 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.mes-hall

Correlated decoherence in a common environment activated by relative motion

Yang Wang , Zhilei Sun , Feiyi Liu , Min Guo , Yuhan Jiang , Mingyang Liu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords correlated decoherencerelative motionopen quantum systemsDoppler shiftkinematic thresholdstructured environmentinfluence functionalboundary subsystems
0
0 comments X

The pith

Relative motion between two subsystems sharing a structured environment activates correlated decoherence above a kinematic velocity threshold.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that when two spatially separated subsystems move relative to each other while coupled to the same environment, their motion can open a channel for irreversible correlated decoherence. This occurs through Doppler shifts that create spectral overlap in the environmental noise kernel once the relative speed exceeds twice the characteristic speed of the environment's excitations. Below the threshold the environment mainly mediates coherent coupling without producing off-diagonal noise; above it a resonant shell forms and the cross-noise term becomes finite, leading to excess correlated dephasing. The result connects kinematic motion effects directly to the reduced dynamics of open quantum systems and identifies measurable signatures in superconducting-phononic setups.

Core claim

Relative motion opens a correlated decoherence channel through Doppler-shifted spectral overlap of the boundary excitations, leading to a kinematic threshold at v>2u_φ. Below threshold, the dominant resonant contribution to the off-diagonal noise kernel is absent and the environment acts predominantly as a coherent mediator at leading resonant order. Above threshold, a resonant shell opens and the same environment supports a finite cross-noise channel, producing irreversible correlated decoherence. In the reduced dynamics, coherent coupling is governed by the retarded component of the dressed correlator, while the decoherence rate is controlled by its Hadamard component.

What carries the argument

The dressed environmental correlator evaluated at the time-dependent moving boundary positions, whose retarded and Hadamard components separately control coherent mediation and the cross-noise decoherence rate.

If this is right

  • The reduced dynamics separate into coherent evolution from the retarded correlator and irreversible dephasing from the Hadamard part.
  • A finite cross-noise channel appears only when a resonant shell opens above the velocity threshold.
  • The same environment switches from predominantly coherent mediator to source of correlated decoherence at the kinematic threshold.
  • Motion-induced excitation production is directly tied to the onset of irreversible correlated dephasing.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Kinematic control of the decoherence channel could be exploited to suppress or enhance correlated dephasing by tuning relative velocity in quantum devices.
  • The threshold effect may generalize to other forms of relative motion or to settings with relativistic boundary conditions.
  • Analogies with motion-induced effects in other open-system contexts become testable once the velocity can be varied continuously.
  • Signatures of the resonant shell could appear as excess noise correlations measurable in phononic or circuit-QED platforms.

Load-bearing premise

That the Gaussian open-system framework permits the influence functional to be obtained by evaluating the dressed environmental correlator at the moving boundary locations with the Doppler-shifted spectral overlaps.

What would settle it

An experiment in which two quantum subsystems are moved at controlled relative speeds in a shared structured environment and correlated dephasing is observed in the off-diagonal density-matrix elements only for speeds above twice the environment mode speed.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.10109 by Feiyi Liu, Min Guo, Mingyang Liu, Yang Wang, Yuhan Jiang, Zhilei Sun.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic of the setup. Plate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Schematic illustration of the velocity-controlled [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Spectral structure of the boundary modes. The dis [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Leading resonant contribution to Im Γ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Frequency-resolved cross-environment kernels be [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Velocity dependence of the regularized cross [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Velocity dependence of the resonant cross [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Peak value of the resonant cross-decoherence rate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Normalized resonant cross-decoherence rate as a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_11.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study two spatially separated boundary subsystems coupled to a common structured environment under relative motion in a Gaussian open-system framework. By integrating out the environment, we obtain an influence functional governed by a dressed environmental correlator evaluated at the boundary positions, which encodes both coherent mediation and correlated fluctuations. Relative motion opens a correlated decoherence channel through Doppler-shifted spectral overlap of the boundary excitations, leading to a kinematic threshold at $v>2u_\phi$. Below threshold, the dominant resonant contribution to the off-diagonal noise kernel is absent and the environment acts predominantly as a coherent mediator at leading resonant order. Above threshold, a resonant shell opens and the same environment supports a finite cross-noise channel, producing irreversible correlated decoherence. In the reduced dynamics, coherent coupling is governed by the retarded component of the dressed correlator, while the decoherence rate is controlled by its Hadamard component. These results establish a direct connection between motion-induced excitation production and correlated decoherence in open quantum systems, and point to experimentally accessible signatures in superconducting--phononic platforms through excess correlated dephasing.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies two spatially separated boundary subsystems coupled to a common structured environment under relative motion within a Gaussian open-system framework. By integrating out the environment, an influence functional is obtained that is governed by a dressed environmental correlator evaluated at the time-dependent boundary positions x_{1,2}(t). Relative motion induces a correlated decoherence channel via Doppler-shifted spectral overlap of boundary excitations, producing a kinematic threshold at v > 2u_φ. Below threshold the off-diagonal noise kernel lacks its dominant resonant contribution and the environment acts primarily as a coherent mediator through the retarded correlator; above threshold a resonant shell opens, enabling a finite cross-noise channel controlled by the Hadamard component and yielding irreversible correlated decoherence. The work links motion-induced excitation production to correlated decoherence and identifies potential signatures in superconducting-phononic platforms.

Significance. If the central derivation holds, the result establishes a direct kinematic mechanism for activating correlated decoherence in open quantum systems through relative motion, extending standard influence-functional techniques to moving boundaries. The explicit separation of coherent mediation (retarded component) from irreversible decoherence (Hadamard component) and the identification of a velocity threshold provide a falsifiable prediction that could be tested in engineered environments. The Gaussian framework and standard integration-out procedure are strengths that allow clean extraction of the dressed correlator.

major comments (1)
  1. [Derivation of the dressed correlator and off-diagonal noise kernel] The derivation of the off-diagonal noise kernel and the kinematic threshold v > 2u_φ (stated in the abstract and developed in the section on the dressed correlator) assumes a linear dispersion relation ω = u_φ |k| for the environmental modes. For a general structured environment with nonlinear dispersion, group-velocity variation permits phase-matching at lower relative speeds, so the resonant contribution to the Hadamard component can become finite below v = 2u_φ. This assumption is load-bearing for the below/above-threshold distinction and the claim that the threshold is a universal kinematic feature rather than model-dependent.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract summarizes the framework and conclusions but contains no explicit equations, threshold expression, or form of the influence functional; adding a single key equation or the explicit threshold condition would improve accessibility.
  2. [Model setup] Notation for the phase velocity u_φ and the Doppler-shifted frequencies ω' = ω(1 ± v·k̂/u_φ) should be introduced with a brief reminder of the underlying dispersion relation when first used in the main text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive feedback. We address the major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to improve clarity.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The derivation of the off-diagonal noise kernel and the kinematic threshold v > 2u_φ (stated in the abstract and developed in the section on the dressed correlator) assumes a linear dispersion relation ω = u_φ |k| for the environmental modes. For a general structured environment with nonlinear dispersion, group-velocity variation permits phase-matching at lower relative speeds, so the resonant contribution to the Hadamard component can become finite below v = 2u_φ. This assumption is load-bearing for the below/above-threshold distinction and the claim that the threshold is a universal kinematic feature rather than model-dependent.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee highlighting this point. The manuscript explicitly adopts the linear dispersion relation ω = u_φ |k| throughout, as is standard for acoustic phonon baths in the superconducting-phononic platforms discussed. Under this assumption the Doppler-shifted resonance condition for the off-diagonal Hadamard component yields the threshold v > 2u_φ, obtained by evaluating the phase-matching integral at the time-dependent boundary positions. We do not claim that v = 2u_φ is a universal number independent of the dispersion; the specific value follows directly from the linear case. For nonlinear dispersions the group-velocity variation would indeed modify the critical relative speed at which the resonant shell opens, and the below/above-threshold distinction would be replaced by a dispersion-dependent phase-matching criterion. The general influence-functional construction and the separation of the dressed correlator into retarded (coherent) and Hadamard (noise) parts remain valid regardless of dispersion. We will revise the abstract and the dressed-correlator section to state explicitly that the threshold v > 2u_φ is derived for linear dispersion and to note that the critical velocity is set by the phase-matching condition of the chosen dispersion relation. This removes any implication of universality while preserving the central kinematic mechanism. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained

full rationale

The paper obtains the influence functional by integrating out the Gaussian environment in the standard way, yielding a dressed correlator evaluated at the time-dependent boundary positions x1,2(t). The off-diagonal noise kernel (Hadamard component) is then computed explicitly, with the Doppler-shifted frequencies ω' = ω(1 ± v·k̂/u_φ) inserted into the spectral integral. The kinematic threshold v > 2u_φ for resonant overlap follows directly as the condition under which the support of the integrand becomes non-empty for linear dispersion ω = u_φ|k|. This is a calculational outcome, not a self-definition, fitted input renamed as prediction, or load-bearing self-citation. No ansatz is smuggled via prior work, and the result is not a renaming of a known empirical pattern. The framework remains falsifiable by changing the dispersion relation or environment spectrum, confirming the derivation chain does not reduce to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard Gaussian open quantum systems framework and the existence of a structured environment whose correlator can be dressed and evaluated at moving positions; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The system is described within a Gaussian open quantum system framework allowing integration out of the environment to obtain an influence functional.
    This is the foundational approach used to derive the dressed environmental correlator and the resulting reduced dynamics.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5499 in / 1341 out tokens · 63616 ms · 2026-05-10T16:36:33.978082+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

106 extracted references · 106 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    (25) This expression shows that inter-boundary correlations are mediated over a finite range set by the inverse decay ratesγ 1,2, so that both coherent coupling and correlated noise are exponentially suppressed at large separation. D. Boundary influence action Integrating out the environmental fieldh, which cou- ples linearly to the boundary modes through...

    work page 2025

  2. [2]

    J. P. Paz and W. H. Zurek, Environment-induced de- coherence and the transition from quantum to classi- cal, inFundamentals of Quantum Information: Quan- tum Computation, Communication, Decoherence and All That, edited by D. Heiss (Springer Berlin Heidel- berg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2002) pp. 77–148

    work page 2002

  3. [3]

    Schlosshauer,Decoherence and the Quantum-To- Classical Transition(Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007) pp

    M. Schlosshauer,Decoherence and the Quantum-To- Classical Transition(Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007) pp. 13–114

    work page 2007

  4. [4]

    W. H. Zurek, Decoherence, einselection, and the quan- tum origins of the classical, Rev. Mod. Phys.75, 715 (2003)

    work page 2003

  5. [5]

    Mazzola, J

    L. Mazzola, J. Piilo, and S. Maniscalco, Sudden transi- tion between classical and quantum decoherence, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 200401 (2010)

    work page 2010

  6. [6]

    BLANCHARD and R

    P. BLANCHARD and R. OLKIEWICZ, Decoherence induced transition from quantum to classical dynamics, Reviews in Mathematical Physics15, 217 (2003)

    work page 2003

  7. [7]

    R. P. Feynman and F. L. Vernon, The theory of a gen- eral quantum system interacting with a linear dissipa- tive system, Annals of Physics24, 118 (1963)

    work page 1963

  8. [8]

    A. O. Caldeira and A. J. Leggett, Path integral ap- proach to quantum brownian motion, Physica A121, 587 (1983)

    work page 1983

  9. [9]

    A. J. Leggett, S. Chakravarty, A. T. Dorsey, M. P. A. Fisher, A. Garg, and W. Zwerger, Dynamics of the dis- sipative two-state system, Reviews of Modern Physics 59, 1 (1987)

    work page 1987

  10. [10]

    W. H. Zurek, Decoherence and the transition from quantum to classical, Phys. Today44N10, 36 (1991), arXiv:quant-ph/0306072

    work page arXiv 1991

  11. [11]

    B. L. Hu, J. P. Paz, and Y. Zhang, Quantum brownian motion in a general environment. ii. nonlinear coupling and perturbative approach, Physical Review D45, 2843 (1992)

    work page 1992

  12. [12]

    Ingold, Path integrals and their application to dissipative quantum systems, inCoherent Evolution in Noisy Environments, edited by A

    G.-L. Ingold, Path integrals and their application to dissipative quantum systems, inCoherent Evolution in Noisy Environments, edited by A. Buchleitner and K. Hornberger (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Hei- delberg, 2002) pp. 1–53

    work page 2002

  13. [13]

    Makri, Numerical path integral techniques for long time dynamics of quantum dissipative systems, Journal of Mathematical Physics36, 2430 (1995)

    N. Makri, Numerical path integral techniques for long time dynamics of quantum dissipative systems, Journal of Mathematical Physics36, 2430 (1995)

    work page 1995

  14. [14]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The Theory of Open Quantum Systems(Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002)

    work page 2002

  15. [15]

    Weiss,Quantum Dissipative Systems, 4th ed

    U. Weiss,Quantum Dissipative Systems, 4th ed. (World Scientific, Singapore, 2012)

    work page 2012

  16. [16]

    Rivas and S

    A. Rivas and S. F. Huelga,Open quantum systems, Vol. 10 (Springer, 2012)

    work page 2012

  17. [17]

    Banerjee, S

    S. Banerjee, S. Banerjee, and Ahmad,Open quantum systems(Springer, 2018)

    work page 2018

  18. [18]

    L. M. Sieberer, M. Buchhold, and S. Diehl, Keldysh field theory for driven open quantum systems, Reports on Progress in Physics79, 096001 (2016)

    work page 2016

  19. [19]

    Altland and B

    A. Altland and B. Simons,Condensed Matter Field The- ory(Cambridge University Press, 2010)

    work page 2010

  20. [20]

    Berges, Introduction to nonequilibrium qft, AIP Conf

    J. Berges, Introduction to nonequilibrium qft, AIP Conf. Proc.739, 3 (2004)

    work page 2004

  21. [21]

    W. T. Strunz, L. Di´ osi, and N. Gisin, Open system dynamics with non-markovian quantum trajectories, Physical Review Letters82, 1801 (1999)

    work page 1999

  22. [22]

    Braun, Creation of entanglement by interaction with a common heat bath, Physical Review Letters89, 277901 (2002)

    D. Braun, Creation of entanglement by interaction with a common heat bath, Physical Review Letters89, 277901 (2002)

    work page 2002

  23. [23]

    J. H. Reina, L. Quiroga, and N. F. Johnson, Deco- herence of quantum registers, Physical Review A65, 032326 (2002)

    work page 2002

  24. [24]

    D. P. S. McCutcheon, N. S. Dattani, E. M. Gauger, B. W. Lovett, and A. Nazir, A general approach to quan- tum dynamics using a variational master equation. ap- plication to phonon-damped rabi rotations in quantum dots, Physical Review B84, 081305 (2011)

    work page 2011

  25. [25]

    A. W. e. a. Chin, Non-equilibrium vibrational struc- tures, Nat. Phys.9, 113 (2013)

    work page 2013

  26. [26]

    Cai and Y

    X. Cai and Y. Zheng, Decoherence induced by non- markovian noise in a nonequilibrium environment, Phys. Rev. A94, 042110 (2016)

    work page 2016

  27. [27]

    de Vega and D

    I. de Vega and D. Alonso, Dynamics of non-markovian open quantum systems, Reviews of Modern Physics89, 015001 (2017)

    work page 2017

  28. [28]

    Shrikant and P

    U. Shrikant and P. Mandayam, Quantum non- markovianity: Overview and recent developments, Frontiers in Quantum Science and TechnologyVolume 2 - 2023, 10.3389/frqst.2023.1134583 (2023)

    work page doi:10.3389/frqst.2023.1134583 2023

  29. [29]

    Sarkar, Non-markovian route to coherence in het- erogeneous diffusive systems, Phys

    A. Sarkar, Non-markovian route to coherence in het- erogeneous diffusive systems, Phys. Rev. E112, 054117 (2025)

    work page 2025

  30. [30]

    S. Yin, S. Liu, J. Song, and H. Luan, Markovian and non-markovian dynamics of quantum coherence in the 15 extendedxxchain, Phys. Rev. A106, 032220 (2022)

    work page 2022

  31. [31]

    Kuo, S.-L

    P.-C. Kuo, S.-L. Yang, N. Lambert, J.-D. Lin, Y.-T. Huang, F. Nori, and Y.-N. Chen, Non-markovian skin effect, Phys. Rev. Res.7, L012068 (2025)

    work page 2025

  32. [32]

    Yugra, F

    Y. Yugra, F. De Zela, and A. Cuevas, Coherence-based measurement of non-markovian dynamics in an open quantum system, Phys. Rev. A101, 013822 (2020)

    work page 2020

  33. [33]

    S. L. Wu, W. Ma, Z.-M. Wang, P. Brumer, and L.- A. Wu, Steady-state coherences under partial collective non-markovian decoherence, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 043221 (2025)

    work page 2025

  34. [34]

    Ablimit, Z.-M

    A. Ablimit, Z.-M. Wang, F.-H. Ren, P. Brumer, and L.- A. Wu, Non-markovian-environment-induced anomaly in steady-state quantum coherence, Phys. Rev. A110, 052220 (2024)

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    Lally, N

    S. Lally, N. Werren, J. Al-Khalili, and A. Rocco, Master equation for non-markovian quantum brownian motion: The emergence of lateral coherences, Phys. Rev. A105, 012209 (2022)

    work page 2022

  36. [36]

    Vatasescu, Electronic memory of vibrational dynam- ics: Non-markovian evolution of electronic coherence from complex dynamical weak values, Phys

    M. Vatasescu, Electronic memory of vibrational dynam- ics: Non-markovian evolution of electronic coherence from complex dynamical weak values, Phys. Rev. A113, 012404 (2026)

    work page 2026

  37. [37]

    H. J. Carmichael,Statistical Methods in Quantum Op- tics 1. Master Equations and Fokker-Planck Equations (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 1999)

    work page 1999

  38. [38]

    Rotter and J

    I. Rotter and J. P. Bird, A review of progress in the physics of open quantum systems: theory and experi- ment, Reports on Progress in Physics78, 114001 (2015)

    work page 2015

  39. [39]

    Suter and G

    D. Suter and G. A. ´Alvarez, Colloquium: Protecting quantum information against environmental noise, Rev. Mod. Phys.88, 041001 (2016)

    work page 2016

  40. [40]

    J. A. Tuszynski, From quantum chemistry to quantum biology: a path toward consciousness, J. Integr. Neu- rosci.19, 687 (2020)

    work page 2020

  41. [41]

    A. A. Clerk, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, F. Marquardt, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Introduction to quantum noise, measurement, and amplification, Reviews of Modern Physics82, 1155 (2010)

    work page 2010

  42. [42]

    Rivas and S

    ´A. Rivas and S. F. Huelga,Open Quantum Systems. An Introduction(Springer, Heidelberg, 2012)

    work page 2012

  43. [43]

    A. A. Balandin, E. Paladino, and P. J. Hakonen, Elec- tronic noise—from advanced materials to quantum tech- nologies, Applied Physics Letters124, 050401 (2024)

    work page 2024

  44. [44]

    X. He, P. Pakkiam, A. A. Gangat, M. J. Kewming, G. J. Milburn, and A. Fedorov, Effect of measurement back- action on quantum clock precision studied with a super- conducting circuit, Phys. Rev. Appl.20, 034038 (2023)

    work page 2023

  45. [45]

    Y. Liu, J. Zhou, L. Mercier de L´ epinay, and M. A. Sil- lanp¨ a¨ a, Quantum backaction evading measurements of a silicon nitride membrane resonator, New Journal of Physics24, 083043 (2022)

    work page 2022

  46. [46]

    P. M. Harrington, E. J. Mueller, and K. W. Murch, Engineered dissipation for quantum information science, Nature Reviews Physics4, 660 (2022)

    work page 2022

  47. [47]

    Campbell and et al., Roadmap on quantum thermo- dynamics, Quantum Science and Technology11, 012501 (2026)

    S. Campbell and et al., Roadmap on quantum thermo- dynamics, Quantum Science and Technology11, 012501 (2026)

    work page 2026

  48. [48]

    M. J. A. Schuetz and et al., Quantum transducers, Phys. Rev. X5, 031031 (2015)

    work page 2015

  49. [49]

    von L¨ upke, Y

    U. von L¨ upke, Y. Yang, B. O. Najera-Santos, K. Ser- niak, H. Wakai, M. Kjaergaard, A. P. M. Place, C. Tahan, A. Dunsworth, J. M. Martinis, and W. D. Oliver, Two-qubit spectroscopy of spatiotemporally correlated quantum noise, PRX Quantum1, 010305 (2020)

    work page 2020

  50. [50]

    Strathearn and et al., Efficient non-markovian quan- tum dynamics, Nat

    A. Strathearn and et al., Efficient non-markovian quan- tum dynamics, Nat. Commun.9, 3322 (2018)

    work page 2018

  51. [51]

    Tamascelli, A

    D. Tamascelli, A. Smirne, J. Lim, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Efficient simulation of finite-temperature open quantum systems, Physical Review Letters123, 090402 (2019)

    work page 2019

  52. [52]

    Kirton, M

    P. Kirton, M. M. Roses, J. Keeling, and E. G. Dalla Torre, Introduction to the dicke model. from equi- librium to nonequilibrium, and vice versa, Advanced Quantum Technologies2, 1800043 (2019)

    work page 2019

  53. [53]

    Chenu, M

    A. Chenu, M. Beau, J. Cao, and A. del Campo, Quan- tum simulation of generic many-body open system dy- namics using classical noise, Physical Review Letters 118, 140403 (2017)

    work page 2017

  54. [54]

    Y. Sung, F. Beaudoin, L. M. Norris, F. Yan, D. K. Kim, J. Y. Qiu, U. von L¨ upke, J. L. Yoder, T. P. Orlando, S. Gustavsson,et al., Non-gaussian noise spectroscopy with a superconducting qubit sensor, Nature communi- cations10, 3715 (2019)

    work page 2019

  55. [55]

    Gul´ acsi and G

    B. Gul´ acsi and G. Burkard, Temporally correlated quan- tum noise in driven quantum systems with applications to quantum gate operations, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 023073 (2025)

    work page 2025

  56. [56]

    Zouet al., Spatially correlated classical and quantum noise in driven qubits, npj Quantum Information10, 46 (2024)

    J. Zouet al., Spatially correlated classical and quantum noise in driven qubits, npj Quantum Information10, 46 (2024)

    work page 2024

  57. [57]

    Brattegard and M

    S. Brattegard and M. Valiente, Thermometry by corre- lated dephasing of impurities in a one-dimensional fermi gas, Physical Review A109, 023309 (2024)

    work page 2024

  58. [58]

    Raaholt Ingelsten, A

    E. Raaholt Ingelsten, A. F. Kockum, and A. Soro, Avoiding decoherence with giant atoms in a two- dimensional structured environment, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 043222 (2024)

    work page 2024

  59. [59]

    J. B. Pendry, Quantum friction, J. Phys. Condens. Mat- ter9, 10301 (1997)

    work page 1997

  60. [60]

    A. I. Volokitin and B. N. J. Persson, Near-field radia- tive heat transfer and noncontact friction, Reviews of Modern Physics79, 1291 (2007)

    work page 2007

  61. [61]

    M. F. Maghrebi, M. Kr¨ uger, and M. Kardar, Nonequi- librium quantum fluctuations of a moving mirror, Phys- ical Review B90, 235423 (2014)

    work page 2014

  62. [62]

    Intravaia and et al., Friction forces on atoms after acceleration, Phys

    F. Intravaia and et al., Friction forces on atoms after acceleration, Phys. Rev. A89, 050101 (2014)

    work page 2014

  63. [63]

    Millen and A

    J. Millen and A. Xuereb, Perspective on quantum ther- modynamics, New J. Phys.22, 013026 (2020)

    work page 2020

  64. [64]

    Reiche, F

    D. Reiche, F. Intravaia, and K. Busch, Wading through the void: Exploring quantum friction and nonequilib- rium fluctuations, APL Photonics7, 030902 (2022)

    work page 2022

  65. [65]

    A. P. Antonov, Y. Zheng, B. Liebchen, and H. L¨ owen, Engineering active motion in quantum matter, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 033008 (2025)

    work page 2025

  66. [66]

    Oelschl¨ ager, D

    M. Oelschl¨ ager, D. Reiche, C. H. Egerland, K. Busch, and F. Intravaia, Electromagnetic viscosity in complex structured environments: From blackbody to quantum friction, Phys. Rev. A106, 052205 (2022)

    work page 2022

  67. [67]

    Nakade, F

    S. Nakade, F. Peper, K. Kanki, and T. Petrosky, Pseu- doratchet through one-dimensional quantum brownian motion for energy-efficient brownian computing, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 043316 (2025)

    work page 2025

  68. [68]

    M. B. Far´ ıas and F. C. Lombardo, Dissipation and de- coherence effects on a moving particle in front of a di- 16 electric plate, Physical Review D93, 065035 (2016)

    work page 2016

  69. [69]

    Viotti, M

    L. Viotti, M. B. Far´ ıas, P. I. Villar, and F. C. Lombardo, Thermal corrections to quantum friction and decoher- ence: A closed-time-path approach to atom-surface in- teraction, Physical Review D99, 105005 (2019)

    work page 2019

  70. [70]

    Jeske and J

    J. Jeske and J. H. Cole, Derivation of markovian master equations for spatially correlated decoherence, Physical Review A87, 052138 (2013)

    work page 2013

  71. [71]

    J. Zou, S. Bosco, and D. Loss, Spatially correlated clas- sical and quantum noise in driven qubits, npj Quantum Information10, 46 (2024)

    work page 2024

  72. [72]

    J. A. Krzywda, Y. Matsumoto, M. D. Smet, L. Try- puten, S. L. de Snoo, S. V. Amitonov, E. van Nieuwen- burg, G. Scappucci, and L. M. K. Vandersypen, Co- herence protection for mobile spin qubits in silicon, arXivarXiv:2602.09179, 10.48550/arXiv.2602.09179 (2026), preprint

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.09179 2026

  73. [73]

    Gamba, B

    D. Gamba, B. Cui, and A. Zaccone, Open quantum sys- tems with particle and bath driven by time-dependent fields, Physical Review A112, 012207 (2025)

    work page 2025

  74. [74]

    Tyagi, H

    B. Tyagi, H. Li, E. R. Bittner, A. Piryatinski, and C. Silva-Acu˜ na, Noise-induced quantum synchroniza- tion and entanglement in a quantum analogue of huy- gens’ clock, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 15, 10896 (2024)

    work page 2024

  75. [75]

    H.-T. Elze, D. E. Miller, and K. Redlich, Gauge theories at finite temperature and chemical potential, Physical Review D35, 748 (1987)

    work page 1987

  76. [76]

    Davoudi and M

    B. Davoudi and M. P. Tosi, Single-particle and collective excitations in a charged bose gas at finite temperature, Physical Review B72, 134520 (2005)

    work page 2005

  77. [77]

    P. W. Anderson, Plasmons, gauge invariance, and mass, Physical Review130, 439 (1963)

    work page 1963

  78. [78]

    Gold, Screening behavior of a charged bose-einstein condensate including many-body effects, Physical Re- view B65, 134521 (2002)

    A. Gold, Screening behavior of a charged bose-einstein condensate including many-body effects, Physical Re- view B65, 134521 (2002)

    work page 2002

  79. [79]

    E. A. Calzetta and B.-L. B. Hu,Nonequilibrium Quan- tum Field Theory(Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge, 2008)

    work page 2008

  80. [80]

    Kamenev,Field Theory of Non-Equilibrium Systems (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011)

    A. Kamenev,Field Theory of Non-Equilibrium Systems (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011)

    work page 2011

Showing first 80 references.