pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.10880 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-13 · 🪐 quant-ph

Effective schemes for fusion of hyperentangled W states

Wen-Xiu Zhang , Wen-Qiang Liu , Hai-Rui Wei This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords hyperentangled W statesfusion schemescross-Kerr nonlinearitypolarizing beam splittersspatial entanglementpolarization entanglementquantum information processingoptical fusion
0
0 comments X

The pith

Hyperentangled W states of n and m photons can be fused into a single (n+m-2)-photon hyper-W state using polarizing beam splitters, balanced beam splitters, half-wave plates, single-photon detectors, and cross-Kerr nonlinearities.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes two fusion schemes for hyperentangled W states. One combines an n-photon hyper-W state with an m-photon hyper-W state to produce an (n+m-2)-photon hyper-W state. The second combines three such states into an (n+m+t-3)-photon version. Both schemes use only standard linear optical elements plus cross-Kerr nonlinearities and require no conditional gates, path couplers, or extra photons. The resulting states stay hyperentangled across polarization and spatial modes, and the designs leave only one garbage output, which the authors tie to high efficiency.

Core claim

We explore a hyperfusion mechanism to fuse one n photon hyper-W state and one m-photon hyper-W state into a large-scale (n+m-2)-photon hyper-W state. Another mechanism to fuse one n-photon hyper-W state, one m-photon hyper-W state, and one t-photon hyper-W state into an (n+m+t-3)-photon hyper-W state is also proposed. These two hyperfusion mechanisms are constructed employing only polarizing beam splitters, balanced beam splitters, half-wave plates, single-photon detectors, and cross-Kerr nonlinearities. Conditional quantum gates, path couplers, and ancillary photons are not required in our constructions. Moreover, our fused W states are hyperentangled in the polarization and spatial degrees

What carries the argument

Hyperfusion mechanism that combines hyper-W states via polarizing beam splitters, balanced beam splitters, half-wave plates, single-photon detectors, and cross-Kerr nonlinearities without ancillary resources or conditional gates.

If this is right

  • Larger hyperentangled W states become constructible from smaller ones for quantum information tasks.
  • The schemes apply to arbitrary photon numbers n, m, and t.
  • Only one garbage output mode is produced, supporting the claim of high efficiency.
  • The output states remain hyperentangled simultaneously in polarization and spatial degrees of freedom.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The approach could reduce the number of initial entangled resources needed to reach a target size of hyperentangled state.
  • Similar fusion logic might extend to other classes of hyperentangled states such as hyper-GHZ states.
  • Real-world tests of the schemes would reveal how cross-Kerr nonlinearities perform under realistic photon loss and detector inefficiency.
  • Scalable versions could support optical quantum networks that require large-scale multipartite entanglement.

Load-bearing premise

The polarizing beam splitters, balanced beam splitters, half-wave plates, single-photon detectors, and cross-Kerr nonlinearities all function ideally without errors or losses.

What would settle it

Fuse two explicit small hyper-W states, such as a pair of 3-photon hyper-W states, and check whether the output matches the expected 4-photon hyper-W state in both polarization and spatial entanglement with only one discarded output mode.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.10880 by Hai-Rui Wei, Wen-Qiang Liu, Wen-Xiu Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Schematic diagram of the two-fusion protocol for fusing one [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Schematic diagram of the three-fusion protocol for fusing one [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Success probability of the presented two-fusion pro [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Success probability of the presented three-fusion pro [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Failure probability of the presented three-fusion protocol when 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Gaussian function curves of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Gaussian function curves of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Success probabilities of the homodyne measurements as a function of the amplitude [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Hyperentangled states are fascinating resources in quantum information processing as they can significantly increase the channel capacity and enhance noise resistance. We explore a hyperfusion mechanism to fuse one n photon hyper-W state and one m-photon hyper-W state into a large-scale (n+m-2)-photon hyper-W state. Another mechanism to fuse one n-photon hyper-W state, one m-photon hyper-$W$ state, and one $t$-photon hyper-W state into an (n+m+t-3)-photon hyper-W state is also proposed. These two hyperfusion mechanisms are constructed employing only polarizing beam splitters, balanced beam splitters, half-wave plates, single-photon detectors, and cross-Kerr nonlinearities. Conditional quantum gates, path couplers, and ancillary photons are not required in our constructions. Moreover, our fused $W$ states are hyperentangled in the polarization and spatial degrees of freedom of single-photon systems. The presence of only one garbage output state demonstrates that high efficiency can be achieved in our schemes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes two hyperfusion schemes for hyperentangled W states. The first fuses an n-photon hyper-W state and an m-photon hyper-W state into an (n+m-2)-photon hyper-W state. The second fuses n-, m-, and t-photon hyper-W states into an (n+m+t-3)-photon hyper-W state. Both constructions employ only polarizing beam splitters, balanced beam splitters, half-wave plates, single-photon detectors, and cross-Kerr nonlinearities, require no ancillary photons or conditional gates, produce a single garbage output mode, and yield states hyperentangled in polarization and spatial degrees of freedom.

Significance. If the optical constructions are shown to produce the claimed output states, the work would offer resource-efficient methods for scaling up hyperentangled W states, which are useful for increasing channel capacity and noise resistance in quantum information tasks. The explicit use of standard linear-optical components plus cross-Kerr, combined with the minimal-garbage-mode feature, represents a constructive contribution to hyperentanglement generation.

major comments (2)
  1. [Two-state hyperfusion mechanism] The two-state hyperfusion construction (described after the abstract) assumes ideal cross-Kerr nonlinearities produce the exact conditional phase shifts needed to map the input polarization-spatial combinations onto the (n+m-2)-photon hyper-W state plus one garbage mode, yet no explicit state-vector evolution, success probability, or output fidelity is supplied for general n and m. This is load-bearing for the central claim of an effective, high-efficiency scheme.
  2. [Three-state hyperfusion mechanism] The three-state hyperfusion construction similarly lacks a step-by-step derivation showing how the combination of PBS, BS, HWP, detectors, and cross-Kerr yields precisely the (n+m+t-3)-photon hyper-W state with one garbage mode. Without this, the assertion that the scheme works for arbitrary n, m, t cannot be verified.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract contains the LaTeX artifact 'hyper-$W$'; ensure consistent math-mode formatting throughout the manuscript.
  2. Figure captions and component labels should explicitly indicate which ports correspond to the 'garbage' output in each scheme.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address the major comments below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested details.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Two-state hyperfusion mechanism] The two-state hyperfusion construction (described after the abstract) assumes ideal cross-Kerr nonlinearities produce the exact conditional phase shifts needed to map the input polarization-spatial combinations onto the (n+m-2)-photon hyper-W state plus one garbage mode, yet no explicit state-vector evolution, success probability, or output fidelity is supplied for general n and m. This is load-bearing for the central claim of an effective, high-efficiency scheme.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit step-by-step state-vector derivation for arbitrary n and m is necessary to fully substantiate the construction. In the revised manuscript we will add a complete calculation of the evolution through the optical circuit (PBS, BS, HWP, detectors and cross-Kerr interactions), explicitly showing the mapping of the input hyper-W states onto the desired (n+m-2)-photon output plus the single garbage mode, together with the associated success probability. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Three-state hyperfusion mechanism] The three-state hyperfusion construction similarly lacks a step-by-step derivation showing how the combination of PBS, BS, HWP, detectors, and cross-Kerr yields precisely the (n+m+t-3)-photon hyper-W state with one garbage mode. Without this, the assertion that the scheme works for arbitrary n, m, t cannot be verified.

    Authors: We concur that the three-state case likewise requires a detailed derivation. The revised version will include a full state-evolution analysis for the n-, m- and t-photon inputs, demonstrating how the linear-optical elements and cross-Kerr nonlinearities produce the (n+m+t-3)-photon hyper-W state together with the single garbage output mode. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: constructive optical schemes with no reduction to inputs

full rationale

The paper proposes explicit fusion constructions for hyperentangled W states using standard components (PBS, BS, HWP, detectors, cross-Kerr). No equations, fitted parameters, or derivations are present that reduce by construction to prior results or self-citations. Claims rest on the existence of ideal-component mappings to (n+m-2) or (n+m+t-3) photon outputs with one garbage mode, which is a direct constructive statement rather than a self-referential or fitted prediction. Self-contained against external benchmarks with no load-bearing self-citation chains.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The proposal rests on standard assumptions about linear optical elements and cross-Kerr interactions behaving as ideal components; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Cross-Kerr nonlinearities produce the required phase shifts conditional on photon number without decoherence or loss.
    Invoked implicitly as the enabling mechanism for the fusion gates.
  • domain assumption Single-photon detectors and beam splitters operate with perfect efficiency and no dark counts.
    Required for the conditional success of the fusion process.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5477 in / 1333 out tokens · 28111 ms · 2026-05-10T16:25:42.350014+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Effective schemes for fusion of hyperentangled W states

    introduced an optical gate to expand anm-photon polarizationWstate to an (m+ 2)-photonWstate assisted by two 50:50 beam splitters (BSs), one phase shifter (PS), and one two-photon Fock state. This scheme was experimentally demonstrated in 2010 [36]. Some im- provedWstate-expansion strategies have also been pro- posed. In 2009, Tashimaet al.[37] demonstrat...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  2. [2]

    Raussendorf and H

    R. Raussendorf and H. J. Briegel, A one-way quantum computer, Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 5188 (2001)

    work page 2001

  3. [3]

    I. D. Smith, H. P. Nautrup, and H. J. Briegel, Par- ity quantum computing as yz-plane measurement-based quantum computing, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 220602 (2024)

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    A. K. Ekert, Quantum cryptography based on Bell’s the- orem, Phys. Rev. Lett.67, 661 (1991)

    work page 1991

  5. [5]

    W. Li, L. Zhang, H. Tan, Y. Lu, S. K. Liao, J. Huang, H. Li, Z. Wang, H. K. Mao, B. Yan, Q. Li, Y. Liu, Q. Zhang, C. Z. Peng, L. You, and F. Xu, High-rate quantum key distribution exceeding 110 Mb s −1, Nat. Photonics17, 416 (2023)

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    Y. Liu, W. J. Zhang, C. Jiang, J. P. Chen, C. Zhang, W. X. Pan, D. Ma, H. Dong, J. M. Xiong, C. J. Zhang, H. Li, R. C. Wang, J. Wu, T. Y. Chen, L. You, X. B. Wang, Q. Zhang, and J. W. Pan, Experimental twin-field quantum key distribution over 1000 km fiber distance, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 210801 (2023)

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    C. H. Bennett, G. Brassard, C. Cr´ epeau, R. Jozsa, A. Peres, and W. K. Wootters, Teleportation an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky- Rosen channels, Phys. Rev. Lett.70, 1895 (1993)

    work page 1993

  8. [8]

    Georgescu, 25 years of experimental quantum telepor- tation, Nat

    I. Georgescu, 25 years of experimental quantum telepor- tation, Nat. Rev. Phys.4, 69 (2022)

    work page 2022

  9. [9]

    X. M. Hu, Y. Guo, B. H. Liu, C. F. Li, and G. C. Guo, Progress in quantum teleportation, Nat. Rev. Phys.5, 339 (2023)

    work page 2023

  10. [10]

    W. Q. Liu and H. R. Wei, Quantum gate teleportation with the superposition of causal order, Phys. Rev. Appl. 23, 014064 (2025)

    work page 2025

  11. [11]

    G. L. Long and X. S. Liu, Theoretically efficient high- capacity quantum-key-distribution scheme, Phys. Rev. A 65, 032302 (2002)

    work page 2002

  12. [12]

    Li and G

    T. Li and G. L. Long, Quantum secure direct commu- nication based on single-photon Bell-state measurement, New J. Phys.22, 063017 (2020)

    work page 2020

  13. [13]

    Y. B. Sheng, L. Zhou, and G. L. Long, One-step quantum secure direct communication, Sci. Bull.67, 367 (2022)

    work page 2022

  14. [14]

    P. Zhao, W. Zhong, M. M. Du, X. Y. Li, L. Zhou, and Y. B. Sheng, Quantum secure direct communication with hybrid entanglement, Front. Phys-Beijing19, 51201 (2024)

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    C. H. Bennett, G. Brassard, S. Popescu, B. Schumacher, J. A. Smolin, and W. K. Wootters, Purification of noisyentanglement and faithful teleportation via noisy channels, Phys. Rev. Lett.76, 722 (1996)

    work page 1996

  16. [16]

    X. M. Hu, C. X. Huang, Y. B. Sheng, L. Zhou, B. H. Liu, Y. Guo, C. Zhang, W. B. Xing, Y. F. Huang, C. F. Li, and G. C. Guo, Long-distance entanglement purifica- tion for quantum communication, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 010503 (2021)

    work page 2021

  17. [17]

    J. Qi, K. Li, Z. Yang, R. Y. Yuan, and B. C. Ren, Er- ror identification entanglement purification for stationary system using high-dimensional entanglement, Phys. Rev. A109, 042423 (2024)

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    C. H. Bennett, H. J. Bernstein, S. Popescu, and B. Schu- macher, Concentrating partial entanglement by local op- erations, Phys. Rev. A53, 2046 (1996)

    work page 2046

  19. [19]

    G. L. Jiang, W. Q. Liu, and H. R. Wei, Heralded and high-efficient entanglement concentrations based on lin- ear optics assisted by time-delay degree of freedom, Opt. Epxress30, 47836 (2022)

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    G. L. Jiang, W. Q. Liu, and H. R. Wei, Prac- tically enhanced hyperentanglement concentration for polarization-spatial hyperentangled Bell states with lin- ear optics and common single-photon detectors, Phys. Rev. Appl.19, 034044 (2023)

    work page 2023

  21. [21]

    Mattle, H

    K. Mattle, H. Weinfurter, P. G. Kwiat, and A. Zeilinger, Dense coding in experimental quantum communication, Phys. Rev. Lett.76, 4656 (1996)

    work page 1996

  22. [22]

    Hillery, V

    M. Hillery, V. Buzek, and A. Berthiaume, Quantum se- cret sharing, Phys. Rev. A59, 1829 (1999)

    work page 1999

  23. [23]

    Cleve, D

    R. Cleve, D. Gottesman, and H. K. Lo, How to share a quantum secret, Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 648 (1999)

    work page 1999

  24. [24]

    Bartolucci, P

    S. Bartolucci, P. Birchall, H. Bomb´ ın, H. Cable, C. Dawson, M. Gimeno-Segovia, E. Johnston, K. Kieling, N. Nickerson, M. Pant, F. Pastawski, T. Rudolph, and C. Sparrow, Fusion-based quantum computation, Nat. Commun.14, 912 (2023)

    work page 2023

  25. [25]

    H. Zhou, T. Li, and K. Xia, Parallel and heralded mul- tiqubit entanglement generation for quantum networks, Phy. Rev. A107, 022428 (2023)

    work page 2023

  26. [26]

    W. H. Su, W. Qin, A. Miranowicz, T. Li, and F. Nori, Heralded quantum entangling gate for distributed quan- tum computation in a decoherence-free subspace, Phys. Rev. A110, 052612 (2024)

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    D¨ ur, Multipartite entanglement that is robust against disposal of particles, Phys

    W. D¨ ur, Multipartite entanglement that is robust against disposal of particles, Phys. Rev. A63, 020303(R) (2001)

    work page 2001

  28. [28]

    H. W. Wang, C. W. Tsai, J. Lin, and C. W. Yang, Authenticated semi-quantum key distribution protocol based on W states, Sensors22, 4998 (2022)

    work page 2022

  29. [29]

    J. Joo, Y. J. Park, S. Oh, and J. Kim, Quantum telepor- tation via a W state, New J. Phys.5, 136 (2003)

    work page 2003

  30. [30]

    J. M. E. Fra¨ ısse and D. Braun, Quantum channel- estimation with particle loss: GHZ versus W states, Quantum Meas. Quantum Metrol.3, 53 (2016)

    work page 2016

  31. [31]

    Lipinska, G

    V. Lipinska, G. Murta, and S. Wehner, Anonymous 14 transmission in a noisy quantum network using the W state, Phys. Rev. A98, 052320 (2018)

    work page 2018

  32. [32]

    D. Bruß, D. P. DiVincenzo, A. Ekert, C. A. Fuchs, C. Macchiavello, and J. A. Smolin, Optimal universal and state-dependent quantum cloning, Phys. Rev. A57, 2368 (1998)

    work page 1998

  33. [33]

    D’Hondt and P

    E. D’Hondt and P. Panangaden, The computational power of the W and GHZ states, Quantum Inf. Comput. 6, 173 (2006)

    work page 2006

  34. [34]

    Joshi, M

    J. Joshi, M. Alimuddin, T. S. Mahesh, and M. Banik, Ex- perimental verification of many-body entanglement using thermodynamic quantities, Phys. Rev. A109, L020403 (2024)

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    C ¸ akmak, S

    B. C ¸ akmak, S. Campbell, B. Vacchini, ¨O. E. M¨ ustecaplıo˘ glu, and M. Paternostro, Robust multipar- tite entanglement generation via a collision model, Phys. Rev. A99, 012319 (2019)

    work page 2019

  36. [36]

    Tashima, S ¸

    T. Tashima, S ¸. K. ¨Ozdemir, T. Yamamoto, M. Koashi, and N. Imoto, Elementary optical gate for expanding an entanglement web, Phys. Rev. A77, 030302 (2008)

    work page 2008

  37. [37]

    Tashima, T

    T. Tashima, T. Kitano, S ¸. K.¨Ozdemir, T. Yamamoto, M. Koashi, and N. Imoto, Demonstration of local expansion toward large-scale entangled webs, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 210503 (2010)

    work page 2010

  38. [38]

    Tashima, S ¸

    T. Tashima, S ¸. K. ¨Ozdemir, T. Yamamoto, M. Koashi, and N. Imoto, Local expansion of photonic W state using a polarization-dependent beamsplitter, New J. Phys.11, 023024 (2009)

    work page 2009

  39. [39]

    Ikuta, T

    R. Ikuta, T. Tashima, T. Yamamoto, M. Koashi, and N. Imoto, Optimal local expansion of W states using linear optics and Fock states, Phys. Rev. A83, 012314 (2011)

    work page 2011

  40. [40]

    Yesilyurt, S

    C. Yesilyurt, S. Bugu, F. Diker, A. Altintas, and F. Oza- ydin, An optical setup for deterministic creation of four partite W state, Acta Phys. Pol. A127, 1230 (2015)

    work page 2015

  41. [41]

    Yesilyurt, S

    C. Yesilyurt, S. Bugu, F. Ozaydin, A. A. Altintas, M. Tame, L. Yang, and S ¸. K. ¨Ozdemir, Deterministic local doubling of W states, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B33, 2313 (2016)

    work page 2016

  42. [42]

    S. K. ¨Ozdemir, E. Matsunaga, T. Tashima, T. Ya- mamoto, M. Koashi, and N. Imoto, An optical fusion gate for W-states, New J. Phys.13, 103003 (2011)

    work page 2011

  43. [43]

    Yesilyurt, S

    C. Yesilyurt, S. Bugu, and F. Ozaydin, An optical gate for simultaneous fusion of four photonic W or Bell states, Quantum Inf. Process.12, 2965 (2013)

    work page 2013

  44. [44]

    Ozaydin, S

    F. Ozaydin, S. Bugu, C. Yesilyurt, A. A. Altintas, M. Tame, and S. K. ¨Ozdemir, Fusing multiple W states simultaneously with a Fredkin gate, Phys. Rev. A89, 042311 (2014)

    work page 2014

  45. [45]

    Y. B. Zheng, X. J. Zhou, H. R. Wei, F. F. Du, and G. Z. Song, Schemes for fusing photonic W-state simultane- ously without qubit loss via weak cross-Kerr nonlineari- ties, Quantum Inf. Process.20, 273 (2021)

    work page 2021

  46. [46]

    S. Bugu, F. Ozaydin, T. Ferrus, and T. Kodera, Prepar- ing multipartite entangled spin qubits via pauli spin blockade, Sci. Rep.10, 3481 (2020)

    work page 2020

  47. [47]

    Ozaydin, C

    F. Ozaydin, C. Yesilyurt, S. Bugu, and M. Koashi, De- terministic preparation of W states via spin-photon in- teractions, Phys. Rev. A103, 052421 (2021)

    work page 2021

  48. [48]

    X. P. Zang, M. Yang, F. Ozaydin, W. Song, and Z. L. Cao, Generating multi-atom entangled W states via light-matter interface based fusion mechanism, Sci. Rep. 5, 16245 (2015)

    work page 2015

  49. [49]

    X. P. Zang, M. Yang, F. Ozaydin, W. Song, and Z. L. Cao, Deterministic generation of large scale atomic W states, Opt. Express24, 12293 (2016)

    work page 2016

  50. [50]

    Y. Q. Ji, X. Q. Shao, and X. X. Yi, Fusing atomic W states via quantum Zeno dynamics, Sci. Rep.7, 1378 (2017)

    work page 2017

  51. [51]

    W. Y. Zhang, Y. L. Liu, Y. Q. Ji, L. Dong, and X. M. Xiu, Fusing atomic W states with Rydberg superatom, Laser Phys. Lett.19, 055206 (2022)

    work page 2022

  52. [52]

    X. Han, Q. Guo, A. D. Zhu, S. Zhang, and H. F. Wang, Effective W-state fusion strategies in nitrogen-vacancy centers via coupling to microtoroidal resonators, Opt. Ex- press25, 17701 (2017)

    work page 2017

  53. [53]

    Z. J. Deng, M. Feng, and K. L. Gao, Simple scheme for generating ann-qubit W state in cavity QED, Phys. Rev. A73, (2006)

    work page 2006

  54. [54]

    X. Han, S. Hu, Q. Guo, H. F. Wang, A. D. Zhu, and S. Zhang, Effective W-state fusion strategies for electronic and photonic qubits via the quantum-dot-microcavity coupled system, Sci. Rep.5, 12790 (2015)

    work page 2015

  55. [55]

    K. Li, F. Z. Kong, M. Yang, Q. Yang, and Z. L. Cao, Qubit-loss-free fusion of W states, Phys. Rev. A94, 062315 (2016)

    work page 2016

  56. [56]

    C. Y. Ding, F. Z. Kong, Q. Yang, M. Yang, and Z. L. Cao, Qubit-loss-free fusion of atomic W states via photonic detection, Quantum Inf. Process.17, 124 (2018)

    work page 2018

  57. [57]

    M. Wang, Q. Hao, F. L. Yan, and T. Gao, Qubit-loss-free fusion of W states employing weak cross-Kerr nonlinear- ities, Quantum Inf. Comput.18, 0075 (2018)

    work page 2018

  58. [58]

    K. Li, T. Chen, X. Hong, H. Mao, and J. Wang, Qubit- loss-free fusion of W states in cavity quantum electrody- namics system, Quantum Inf. Process.18, 273 (2019)

    work page 2019

  59. [59]

    S. Bugu, C. Yesilyurt, and F. Ozaydin, Enhancing the W-state quantum-network-fusion process with a single Fredkin gate, Phys. Rev. A87, 032331 (2013)

    work page 2013

  60. [60]

    H. R. Wei, W.Q. Liu, and L. C. Kwek, Efficient fusion of photonic W-states with nonunitary partial-swap gates, New J. Phys.22, 093501 (2020)

    work page 2020

  61. [61]

    S. P. Walborn, S. P´ adua, and C. H. Monken, Hyperentanglement-assisted Bell-state analysis, Phys. Rev. A68, 042313 (2003)

    work page 2003

  62. [62]

    T. C. Wei, J. T. Barreiro, and P. G. Kwiat, Hyperentan- gled Bell-state analysis, Phys. Rev. A75, 060305 (2007)

    work page 2007

  63. [63]

    Y. B. Sheng, F. G. Deng, and G. L. Long, Complete hyperentangled-Bell-state analysis for quantum commu- nication, Phys. Rev. A82, 032318 (2010)

    work page 2010

  64. [64]

    T. J. Wang, Y. Lu, and G. L. Long, Generation and complete analysis of the hyperentangled Bell state for photons assisted by quantum-dot spins in optical micro- cavities, Phys. Rev. A86, 042337 (2012)

    work page 2012

  65. [65]

    X. J. Zhou, W. Q. Liu, H. R. Wei, Y. B. Zheng, and F. F. Du, Deterministic and complete hyperentangled Bell states analysis assisted by frequency and time interval degrees of freedom, Front. Phys-Beijing17, 41502 (2022)

    work page 2022

  66. [66]

    T. J. Wang, S. C. Mi, and C. Wang, Hyperentanglement purification using imperfect spatial entanglement, Opt. Express25, 02969 (2017)

    work page 2017

  67. [67]

    F. F. Du, Y. T. Liu, Z. R. Shi, Y. X. Liang, J. Tang, and J. Liu, Efficient hyperentanglement purification for three- photon systems with the fidelity-robust quantum gates and hyperentanglement link, Opt. Express27, 27046 (2019)

    work page 2019

  68. [68]

    B. C. Ren, G. Y. Wang, and F. G. Deng, Universal hy- perparallel hybrid photonic quantum gates with dipole- induced transparency in the weak-coupling regime, Phys. Rev. A91, 032328 (2015). 15

    work page 2015

  69. [69]

    Li and G

    T. Li and G. L. Long, Hyperparallel optical quantum computation assisted by atomic ensembles embedded in double-sided optical cavities, Phys. Rev. A94, 022343 (2016)

    work page 2016

  70. [70]

    B. C. Ren, F. F. Du, and F. G. Deng, Hyperentanglement concentration for two-photon four-qubit systems with lin- ear optics, Phys. Rev. A88, 012302 (2013)

    work page 2013

  71. [71]

    X. H. Li and S. Ghose, Hyperentanglement concentra- tion for time-bin and polarization hyperentangled pho- tons, Phys. Rev. A91, 062302 (2015)

    work page 2015

  72. [72]

    F. F. Du, X. M. Ren, M. Ma, and G. Fan, Qudit-based high-dimensional controlled-not gate, Opt. Lett.49, 1229 (2024)

    work page 2024

  73. [73]

    F. F. Du, M. Ma, Z. Y. Bai, and Q. L. Tan, Generation of arbitrary high-dimensional qudit-based entangled states, Phys. Rev. A111, 032604 (2025)

    work page 2025

  74. [74]

    Meng, Deterministic linear-optical quantum control gates utilizing path and polarization degrees of freedom, Phys

    H. Meng, Deterministic linear-optical quantum control gates utilizing path and polarization degrees of freedom, Phys. Rev. A105, 032607 (2022)

    work page 2022

  75. [75]

    M. D. Lukin, A. Imamoˇ glu, Controlling photons using electromagnetically induced transparency, Nature413, 273 (2001)

    work page 2001