arxiv: 2604.11085 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-13 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.quant-gas· cond-mat.stat-mech

Recognition: unknown

Protecting Quantum Simulations of Lattice Gauge Theories through Engineered Emergent Hierarchical Symmetries

Zhanpeng Fu , Wei Zheng , Roderich Moessner , Marin Bukov , Hongzheng Zhao

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.stat-mech

keywords lattice gauge theoryFloquet engineeringquantum simulationgauge symmetry protectionemergent symmetriesquantum link modelerror mitigation

0 comments

The pith

Floquet engineering can restructure errors in quantum simulations so that emergent symmetries appear hierarchically in time and protect the target gauge sector of U(1) lattice gauge theories.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a periodic-driving method that turns unavoidable departures from the desired gauge sector into a controllable sequence of emergent local symmetries. These symmetries impose approximate selection rules that limit how population spreads between sectors, producing a clear hierarchy of lifetimes. A sympathetic reader cares because current hardware cannot enforce gauge constraints perfectly, so any passive mechanism that delays violations could let simulations run longer before errors accumulate.

Core claim

Applying a carefully chosen Floquet drive restructures departures from the target sector into a time-ordered hierarchy of emergent local symmetries; the resulting dynamical selection rules strongly restrict inter-sector couplings and thereby create a symmetry-controlled hierarchy of lifetimes in which the target sector remains long-lived while other sectors destabilize on shorter timescales.

What carries the argument

The Floquet-engineering framework that induces a controllable series of emergent local symmetries hierarchically in time.

If this is right

U(1) lattice gauge theories acquire a protected target sector whose violations are suppressed on long timescales.
Some gauge sectors remain very long-lived while others decay faster, establishing a controllable lifetime hierarchy.
Gauge-violating defects become mobile only with assistance from intra-sector dynamics, as captured by an effective quantum marble model.
The same mechanism supplies a form of passive error correction for approximate implementations of local symmetries in many-body simulations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The approach could be tested in existing trapped-ion or superconducting-qubit platforms by monitoring sector populations under periodic driving.
Similar hierarchical driving might extend coherence in other constrained systems such as Rydberg-atom arrays or Hubbard models with approximate conservation laws.
Combining the emergent-symmetry protection with existing active error-correction protocols could yield multiplicative gains in simulation lifetime.

Load-bearing premise

The periodic driving can be realized with enough experimental precision to establish the intended hierarchy of emergent symmetries without introducing uncontrolled decoherence or extra errors that destroy the timescale separation.

What would settle it

In the one-dimensional U(1) quantum link model, measure the population decay rates out of the target gauge sector under the proposed drive and check whether the observed lifetimes follow the predicted symmetry-controlled hierarchy.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.11085 by Hongzheng Zhao, Marin Bukov, Roderich Moessner, Wei Zheng, Zhanpeng Fu.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: FIG. 1. Graphic representation of the local symmetry violation dynamics. (a) Defect configurations and their dynamics in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Dynamical protection of matter and gauge field dynamics. (a) Dynamics of the charge for the initial sector with defect [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Validation of the quantum marble model(QMM). (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Dynamics of defect and prethermal lifetime scaling [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We present a strategy for the quantum simulation of many-body lattice models with constrained Hilbert spaces. We focus on lattice gauge theories (LGTs), which underlie a wide range of phenomena in particle physics, condensed matter, and quantum information. In present-day quantum computing platforms, perfect restrictions of the Hilbert space to the desired gauge sectors are beyond reach: for LGTs, violations of the local constraint are unavoidable, posing a formidable challenge for the emulation of the underlying physics. Here, we develop a Floquet-engineering framework that restructures departures from a target sector such that a series of emergent local symmetries occurs hierarchically in time and in a controllable way. This leads to a set of approximate dynamical selection rules that strongly restrict inter-sector couplings, resulting in a pronounced, symmetry-controlled hierarchy of lifetimes for the state population to spread among sectors. Concretely, this protects $U(1)$ LGTs against violations of the {defining} local symmetry. While some sectors remain very long-lived, others are destabilized on shorter timescales. We numerically verify our theory for the one-dimensional $U(1)$ quantum link model. In addition, we reveal that `defects', whose movement accounts for violations of the gauge constraint, are kinetically constrained, becoming mobile only through the assistance of intra-sector dynamics, which we describe using an effective quantum marble model. Our results can thus be used to extend the lifetime, in the spirit of passive error correction, of quantum simulations of complex many-body problems when emergent or desired local symmetries are only implemented approximately.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper gives a workable Floquet method to impose a time-ordered hierarchy of emergent symmetries that slows gauge violations in U(1) LGT simulations, with 1D numerics and a defect model as support.

read the letter

The core contribution is a Floquet-driving scheme that turns gauge violations into a sequence of approximate local symmetries appearing at different times. This creates dynamical selection rules and a clear lifetime hierarchy across sectors, so the target gauge sector stays populated longer while others decay faster. The authors verify the idea numerically on the one-dimensional U(1) quantum link model and back it with an effective marble model that shows defects only move when assisted by intra-sector dynamics. That combination makes the protection mechanism transparent and testable. The numerics and the effective model are the parts that actually land; they turn an abstract symmetry argument into something concrete. The main limitation is that the whole hierarchy depends on clean, precise driving. Real hardware noise or imperfect pulses could smear the timescale separation and weaken the effect, and the paper only shows the 1D case. Higher-dimensional or non-Abelian extensions are left open. The central claim still holds on its own terms without circular fitting or unsupported leaps. This is useful for groups running quantum simulations of gauge theories or other constrained models on current devices who need passive ways to stretch coherence times. It is not a universal fix but a targeted engineering tool. I would send it to referees; the numerics and model give enough substance for experts in Floquet control and LGT simulation to evaluate properly.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a Floquet-engineering framework that imposes a controllable temporal hierarchy of emergent local symmetries on departures from a target gauge sector in lattice gauge theories. This generates approximate dynamical selection rules that restrict inter-sector couplings and produce a symmetry-controlled hierarchy of state lifetimes. The approach is applied to protect U(1) LGTs against local gauge violations; it is numerically verified for the one-dimensional U(1) quantum link model and supplemented by an effective quantum marble model that accounts for the kinetic constraints on defect motion.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work provides a concrete passive-error-correction strategy for quantum simulations of constrained many-body systems. By converting uncontrolled gauge violations into a tunable hierarchy of lifetimes rather than demanding perfect Hilbert-space restrictions, the method is directly relevant to current quantum hardware. The combination of Floquet analysis, explicit 1D numerics, and a reduced effective model for defects constitutes a reproducible and falsifiable contribution that could guide experimental implementations.

minor comments (3)

Abstract, line containing 'violations of the {defining} local symmetry': the curly braces appear to be a LaTeX artifact and should be removed for readability.
Numerical verification section: while the abstract states that the theory is verified for the 1D U(1) quantum link model, the manuscript would benefit from explicit reporting of system sizes, driving frequencies, and quantitative measures (e.g., extracted lifetime ratios with error bars) to allow independent assessment of the timescale separation.
Effective marble model: the derivation of the kinetic constraints on defects is only sketched; a short appendix or paragraph clarifying the mapping from the microscopic Floquet Hamiltonian to the marble dynamics would improve transparency.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and positive assessment of our manuscript. The summary accurately reflects our Floquet-engineering approach to creating a temporal hierarchy of emergent local symmetries that protect U(1) lattice gauge theories against gauge violations. We appreciate the recognition of the method's relevance to current quantum hardware and the combination of analytical, numerical, and effective-model results. Since the report raises no specific major comments or requests for changes, we have no point-by-point revisions to address.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper's central derivation introduces a Floquet-engineering protocol that imposes a controllable temporal hierarchy of emergent local symmetries on departures from the target gauge sector. This is constructed from standard Floquet theory and symmetry considerations, then verified by independent 1D quantum-link-model numerics and an effective marble model for defect mobility. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or self-citation chain; the approximate dynamical selection rules and lifetime hierarchy follow directly from the engineered driving Hamiltonian without presupposing the target protection result.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based on the abstract, the work relies on standard Floquet theory and local gauge symmetry assumptions without introducing new free parameters or postulated entities.

axioms (2)

standard math Floquet theory applies to periodically driven quantum many-body systems and generates effective time-dependent symmetries
The framework is built directly on Floquet engineering principles.
domain assumption Local gauge constraints define the target sectors whose violations can be restructured by driving
Core modeling assumption for lattice gauge theories.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5600 in / 1416 out tokens · 70386 ms · 2026-05-10T16:01:47.293353+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages

[1]

The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, Peking Univer- sity

Over a long time scale, the defect density exhibits an al- gebraic scaling ∆n d j ∼t α at sitej= 0, whereαis close to 2. (b) Scaling of the lifetime of theU(1) local prethermal plateau with respect to the driving frequencyτ∼T −γ F . The life- time is defined as the time forn d j decays toe −0.4. Combining the results in (a) and (b), the dynamics show that...

2026
[2]

J. B. Kogut, An introduction to lattice gauge theory and spin systems, Reviews of Modern Physics51, 659 (1979)

1979
[3]

F. J. Wegner, Duality in generalized ising models and phase transitions without local order parameters, Journal of Mathematical Physics12, 2259 (1971)

1971
[4]

P. W. Anderson, The resonating valence bond state in 10 la2cuo4 and superconductivity, science235, 1196 (1987)

1987
[5]

S. A. Kivelson, D. S. Rokhsar, and J. P. Sethna, Topology of the resonating valence-bond state: Solitons and high-t c superconductivity, Physical Review B35, 8865 (1987)

1987
[6]

S. C. Zhang, T. H. Hansson, and S. Kivelson, Effective- field-theory model for the fractional quantum hall effect, Physical review letters62, 82 (1989)

1989
[7]

Castelnovo, R

C. Castelnovo, R. Moessner, and S. L. Sondhi, Magnetic monopoles in spin ice, Nature451, 42 (2008)

2008
[8]

K. A. Ross, L. Savary, B. D. Gaulin, and L. Balents, Quantum excitations in quantum spin ice, Physical Re- view X1, 021002 (2011)

2011
[9]

A. Y. Kitaev, Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons, Annals of physics303, 2 (2003)

2003
[10]

Bombin and M

H. Bombin and M. A. Martin-Delgado, Topological quantum distillation, Physical review letters97, 180501 (2006)

2006
[11]

Iqbal, A

M. Iqbal, A. Lyons, C. F. B. Lo, N. Tantivasadakarn, J. Dreiling, C. Foltz, T. M. Gatterman, D. Gresh, N. He- witt, C. A. Holliman, et al., Qutrit toric code and parafermions in trapped ions, Nature Communications 16, 6301 (2025)

2025
[12]

Bravyi, M

S. Bravyi, M. B. Hastings, and S. Michalakis, Topolog- ical quantum order: stability under local perturbations, Journal of mathematical physics51(2010)

2010
[13]

D. A. Lidar and T. A. Brun, Quantum error correction (Cambridge university press, 2013)

2013
[14]

Yao and S

H. Yao and S. A. Kivelson, Exact chiral spin liquid with non-abelian anyons, Physical review letters99, 247203 (2007)

2007
[15]

Cassella, P

G. Cassella, P. d’Ornellas, T. Hodson, W. M. Natori, and J. Knolle, An exact chiral amorphous spin liquid, Nature Communications14, 6663 (2023)

2023
[16]

Smith, J

A. Smith, J. Knolle, D. L. Kovrizhin, and R. Moessner, Disorder-free localization, Physical review letters118, 266601 (2017)

2017
[17]

The sectors obeying Gauss’ law may or may not include gauge charges as sources and sinks of gauge flux

Indeed, there is some non-uniformity with respect to nomenclature here. The sectors obeying Gauss’ law may or may not include gauge charges as sources and sinks of gauge flux. These charges may or may not be mobile. In cases where Gauss’ law is violated, one can retain the language of charges by assigning so-called background charges, the presence of whic...
[18]

Cheng and H

Y. Cheng and H. Zhai, Emergent u (1) lattice gauge the- ory in rydberg atom arrays, Nature Reviews Physics6, 566 (2024)

2024
[19]

J. C. Halimeh, M. Aidelsburger, F. Grusdt, P. Hauke, and B. Yang, Cold-atom quantum simulators of gauge theories, Nature Physics21, 25 (2025)

2025
[20]

Banerjee, M

D. Banerjee, M. B¨ ogli, M. Dalmonte, E. Rico, P. Stebler, U.-J. Wiese, and P. Zoller, Atomic quantum simulation of u (n) and su (n) non-abelian lattice gauge theories, Physical review letters110, 125303 (2013)

2013
[21]

Zohar, J

E. Zohar, J. I. Cirac, and B. Reznik, Cold-atom quan- tum simulator for su (2) yang-mills lattice gauge theory, Physical review letters110, 125304 (2013)

2013
[22]

Tagliacozzo, A

L. Tagliacozzo, A. Celi, P. Orland, M. Mitchell, and M. Lewenstein, Simulation of non-abelian gauge theo- ries with optical lattices, Nature communications4, 2615 (2013)

2013
[23]

Zohar, J

E. Zohar, J. I. Cirac, and B. Reznik, Quantum simula- tions of lattice gauge theories using ultracold atoms in op- tical lattices, Reports on Progress in Physics79, 014401 (2015)

2015
[24]

E. A. Martinez, C. A. Muschik, P. Schindler, D. Nigg, A. Erhard, M. Heyl, P. Hauke, M. Dalmonte, T. Monz, P. Zoller, et al., Real-time dynamics of lattice gauge the- ories with a few-qubit quantum computer, Nature534, 516 (2016)

2016
[25]

Schweizer, F

C. Schweizer, F. Grusdt, M. Berngruber, L. Barbiero, E. Demler, N. Goldman, I. Bloch, and M. Aidelsburger, Floquet approach toZ 2 lattice gauge theories with ultra- cold atoms in optical lattices, Nature Physics15, 1168 (2019)

2019
[26]

F. M. Surace, P. P. Mazza, G. Giudici, A. Lerose, A. Gambassi, and M. Dalmonte, Lattice gauge theories and string dynamics in rydberg atom quantum simula- tors, Physical Review X10, 021041 (2020)

2020
[27]

D. Luo, G. Carleo, B. K. Clark, and J. Stokes, Gauge equivariant neural networks for quantum lattice gauge theories, Physical review letters127, 276402 (2021)

2021
[28]

Zhou, G.-X

Z.-Y. Zhou, G.-X. Su, J. C. Halimeh, R. Ott, H. Sun, P. Hauke, B. Yang, Z.-S. Yuan, J. Berges, and J.-W. Pan, Thermalization dynamics of a gauge theory on a quantum simulator, Science377, 311 (2022)

2022
[29]

Mueller, T

N. Mueller, T. V. Zache, and R. Ott, Thermalization of gauge theories from their entanglement spectrum, Phys- ical Review Letters129, 011601 (2022)

2022
[30]

Buˇ ca, Unified theory of local quantum many-body dy- namics: Eigenoperator thermalization theorems, Physi- cal Review X13, 031013 (2023)

B. Buˇ ca, Unified theory of local quantum many-body dy- namics: Eigenoperator thermalization theorems, Physi- cal Review X13, 031013 (2023)

2023
[31]

Homeier, A

L. Homeier, A. Bohrdt, S. Linsel, E. Demler, J. C. Hal- imeh, and F. Grusdt, Realistic scheme for quantum simu- lation ofZ 2 lattice gauge theories with dynamical matter in (2+1) d, Communications Physics6, 127 (2023)

2023
[32]

B.-Y. Sun, N. Goldman, M. Aidelsburger, and M. Bukov, Engineering and probing non-abelian chiral spin liquids using periodically driven ultracold atoms, PRX Quantum 4, 020329 (2023)

2023
[33]

H.-K. Jin, J. Knolle, and M. Knap, Fractionalized prethermalization in a driven quantum spin liquid, Phys- ical Review Letters130, 226701 (2023)

2023
[34]

E. C. Domanti, D. Zappal` a, A. Bermudez, and L. Amico, Floquet-rydberg quantum simulator for confinement in Z2 gauge theories, Physical Review Research6, L022059 (2024)

2024
[35]

M. Meth, J. Zhang, J. F. Haase, C. Edmunds, L. Postler, A. J. Jena, A. Steiner, L. Dellantonio, R. Blatt, P. Zoller, et al., Simulating two-dimensional lattice gauge theories on a qudit quantum computer, Nature Physics , 1 (2025)

2025
[36]

Hanada, S

M. Hanada, S. Matsuura, A. Schafer, and J. Sun, Gauge symmetry in quantum simulation, arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.22932 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[37]

M. Will, T. Cochran, E. Rosenberg, B. Jobst, N. M. Eassa, P. Roushan, M. Knap, A. Gammon-Smith, and F. Pollmann, Probing non-equilibrium topological order on a quantum processor, Nature645, 348 (2025)

2025
[38]

Mueller, T

N. Mueller, T. Wang, O. Katz, Z. Davoudi, and M. Cetina, Quantum computing universal thermalization dynamics in a (2+ 1) d lattice gauge theory, Nature Com- munications16, 5492 (2025)

2025
[39]

Y.-M. Hu, Z. Wang, B. Lian, and Z. Wang, Many-body non-hermitian skin effect with exact steady states in the dissipative quantum link model, Physical Review Letters 135, 260401 (2025)

2025
[40]

P. R. Datla, L. Zhao, W. W. Ho, N. Klco, and H. Loh, Statistical localization of u (1) lattice gauge theory in a 11 rydberg simulator, Nature Physics , 1 (2026)

2026
[41]

Feldmeier, N

J. Feldmeier, N. Maskara, N. U. K¨ oyl¨ uo˘ glu, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum simulation of dynamical gauge theo- ries in periodically driven rydberg atom arrays, arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.02733 (2024)

work page arXiv 2024
[42]

A. A. Geim, N. U. Koyluoglu, S. J. Evered, R. Sa- hay, S. H. Li, M. Xu, D. Bluvstein, N. O. Gjonbalaj, N. Maskara, M. Kalinowski, T. Manovitz, R. Verre- sen, S. F. Yelin, J. Feldmeier, M. Greiner, V. Vuletic, and M. D. Lukin, Engineering quantum criticality and dynamics on an analog-digital simulator (2026), arXiv:2602.18555 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2026
[43]

B. Yang, H. Sun, R. Ott, H.-Y. Wang, T. V. Zache, J. C. Halimeh, Z.-S. Yuan, P. Hauke, and J.-W. Pan, Observa- tion of gauge invariance in a 71-site bose–hubbard quan- tum simulator, Nature587, 392 (2020)

2020
[44]

D. K. Mark, F. M. Surace, T. Schuster, A. L. Shaw, W. Gong, S. Choi, and M. Endres, Observation of bal- listic plasma and memory in high-energy gauge theory dynamics, arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.11679 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[45]

Iqbal, N

M. Iqbal, N. Tantivasadakarn, R. Verresen, S. L. Camp- bell, J. M. Dreiling, C. Figgatt, J. P. Gaebler, J. Jo- hansen, M. Mills, S. A. Moses, et al., Non-abelian topo- logical order and anyons on a trapped-ion processor, Na- ture626, 505 (2024)

2024
[46]

Mildenberger, W

J. Mildenberger, W. Mruczkiewicz, J. C. Halimeh, Z. Jiang, and P. Hauke, Confinement in a z 2 lattice gauge theory on a quantum computer, Nature Physics 21, 312 (2025)

2025
[47]

Concretely, we have [W j, HLGT] = 0, withW j =e −iθj Gj for anyjand an arbitrary angleθ j
[48]

In the presence of additional terms that break globalU(1) symmetry, it is also feasible to achieve HSB structure with potentially more complex driving protocols
[49]

The symmetry group here satisfiesU local(1)⊃Z local 2 × U(1) global ⊃E. In Floquet dynamics, due to the struc- ture of the effective Hamiltonian, the system sequentially enters prethermal plateaus that preserve the correspond- ing symmetry along the direction of the arrow
[50]

X. Mi, M. Ippoliti, C. Quintana, A. Greene, Z. Chen, J. Gross, F. Arute, K. Arya, J. Atalaya, R. Babbush, et al., Time-crystalline eigenstate order on a quantum processor, Nature601, 531 (2022)

2022
[51]

Beatrez, C

W. Beatrez, C. Fleckenstein, A. Pillai, E. de Leon Sanchez, A. Akkiraju, J. Diaz Alcala, S. Conti, P. Reshetikhin, E. Druga, M. Bukov, et al., Critical prethermal discrete time crystal created by two-frequency driving, Nature Physics19, 407 (2023)

2023
[52]

Zhang, W

X. Zhang, W. Jiang, J. Deng, K. Wang, J. Chen, P. Zhang, W. Ren, H. Dong, S. Xu, Y. Gao, et al., Dig- ital quantum simulation of floquet symmetry-protected topological phases, Nature607, 468 (2022)

2022
[53]

P. T. Dumitrescu, J. G. Bohnet, J. P. Gaebler, A. Han- kin, D. Hayes, A. Kumar, B. Neyenhuis, R. Vasseur, and A. C. Potter, Dynamical topological phase realized in a trapped-ion quantum simulator, Nature607, 463 (2022)

2022
[54]

Z. Fu, R. Moessner, H. Zhao, and M. Bukov, Engineering hierarchical symmetries, Physical Review X14, 041070 (2024)

2024
[55]

For simplicity, here we focus on systems with open boundary conditions (OBC); generalization for periodic boundary conditions can be found in the Supplementary Material
[56]

Ebner, A

L. Ebner, A. Sch¨ afer, C. Seidl, B. M¨ uller, and X. Yao, Eigenstate thermalization in (2+ 1)-dimensional su (2) lattice gauge theory, Physical Review D109, 014504 (2024)

2024
[57]

Homeier, A

L. Homeier, A. Pizzi, H. Zhao, J. C. Halimeh, F. Grusdt, and A. M. Rey, Prethermal gauge structure and sur- face growth inZ 2 lattice gauge theories, arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.12800 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[58]

Hudomal, I

A. Hudomal, I. Vasi´ c, N. Regnault, and Z. Papi´ c, Quan- tum scars of bosons with correlated hopping, Communi- cations Physics3, 99 (2020)

2020
[59]

C.-J. Lin, V. Calvera, and T. H. Hsieh, Quantum many- body scar states in two-dimensional rydberg atom arrays, Physical Review B101, 220304 (2020)

2020
[60]

P. Sala, T. Rakovszky, R. Verresen, M. Knap, and F. Poll- mann, Ergodicity breaking arising from hilbert space fragmentation in dipole-conserving hamiltonians, Phys- ical Review X10, 011047 (2020)

2020
[61]

Gopalakrishnan, D

S. Gopalakrishnan, D. A. Huse, V. Khemani, and R. Vasseur, Hydrodynamics of operator spreading and quasiparticle diffusion in interacting integrable systems, Physical Review B98, 220303 (2018)

2018
[62]

Bertini, F

B. Bertini, F. Heidrich-Meisner, C. Karrasch, T. Prosen, R. Steinigeweg, and M. ˇZnidariˇ c, Finite-temperature transport in one-dimensional quantum lattice models, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 025003 (2021)

2021
[63]

J. F. Wienand, S. Karch, A. Impertro, C. Schweizer, E. McCulloch, R. Vasseur, S. Gopalakrishnan, M. Aidels- burger, and I. Bloch, Emergence of fluctuating hydrody- namics in chaotic quantum systems, Nature Physics20, 1732 (2024)

2024
[64]

Papaefstathiou, A

I. Papaefstathiou, A. Smith, and J. Knolle, Disorder-free localization in a simple u (1) lattice gauge theory, Phys- ical Review B102, 165132 (2020)

2020
[65]

P. A. McClarty, M. Haque, A. Sen, and J. Richter, Disorder-free localization and many-body quantum scars from magnetic frustration, Physical Review B102, 224303 (2020)

2020
[66]

Karpov, R

P. Karpov, R. Verdel, Y.-P. Huang, M. Schmitt, and M. Heyl, Disorder-free localization in an interacting 2d lattice gauge theory, Physical Review Letters126, 130401 (2021)

2021
[67]

J. C. Halimeh, L. Homeier, H. Zhao, A. Bohrdt, F. Grusdt, P. Hauke, and J. Knolle, Enhancing disorder- free localization through dynamically emergent local symmetries, PRX Quantum3, 020345 (2022)

2022
[68]

Chakraborty, M

N. Chakraborty, M. Heyl, P. Karpov, and R. Moessner, Disorder-free localization transition in a two-dimensional lattice gauge theory, Physical Review B106, L060308 (2022)

2022
[69]

Pichler, M

T. Pichler, M. Dalmonte, E. Rico, P. Zoller, and S. Mon- tangero, Real-time dynamics in u (1) lattice gauge theo- ries with tensor networks, Physical Review X6, 011023 (2016)

2016
[70]

T. N. Ikeda and A. Polkovnikov, Fermi’s golden rule for heating in strongly driven floquet systems, Physical Re- view B104, 134308 (2021)

2021
[71]

H.-C. Yeh, A. Rosch, and A. Mitra, Decay rates of almost strong modes in floquet spin chains beyond fermi’s golden rule, Physical Review B108, 075112 (2023). 1 Supplementary Material Protecting Quantum Simulations of Lattice Gauge Theories through Engineered Emergent Hierarchical Symmetries CONTENTS SM 1. Lattice gauge theory represented as a spin system ...

2023
[72]

Open chains with single defect and kink 3
[73]

Mapping for closed chain and multiple defects and kinks 4
[74]

Floquet protocol for systems with general perturbation (h̸= 0) 6

Numerical results for multiple defects and kinks dynamics 5 SM 5. Floquet protocol for systems with general perturbation (h̸= 0) 6
[75]

Perturbation theory for the dynamics of local charge 8 SM 7

Effective Hamiltonian for the driving protocol 7 SM 6. Perturbation theory for the dynamics of local charge 8 SM 7. Generalization to arbitrary spin-S gauge fields 11 SM 1. LATTICE GAUGE THEORY REPRESENTED AS A SPIN SYSTEM The traditional fermionic lattice gauge theory [68] is described byH LGT =P j ψ† j Uj,j+1ψj+1 +h.c.Hereψ j (ψ† j) are fermionic annihi...
[76]

Open chains with single defect and kink We first show that under OBC the HamiltoniansH LGT andH 1 can be mapped to simple hopping models for the kink and defect by defining the creation operators for kinkκ † j and defect ∆ † j as Case 1 (defect on the left-hand side of kink):κ † j = L−1Y k=j τ + k,k+1σ+ j ,∆ † j = jY k=0 τ + k−1,kσ+ j Case 2 (defect on th...
[77]

However, although the mapping of the operators defined 5 in the previous section is direct, it only works for the case with one defect and one kink

Mapping for closed chain and multiple defects and kinks From the discussion in the main text, we know that the dynamics of the charges in the system underZlocal 2 symmetry are primarily described by the dynamics of kinks and defects. However, although the mapping of the operators defined 5 in the previous section is direct, it only works for the case with...
[78]

Specifically, we considerh= 0, and compare the dynamics of the effective Hamiltonian in Eq

Numerical results for multiple defects and kinks dynamics For systems with multiple defects and kinks, with exact mapping as above, our numerical results demonstrate that the QMM can still describe the early dynamics of such systems. Specifically, we considerh= 0, and compare the dynamics of the effective Hamiltonian in Eq. (S.11) with the corresponding Q...
[79]

The driving period isT F = 8(2+ J K )T

Driving protocol The explicit form of our driving protocol is U0 =e −iH J+K K T , U1 =P z† τ P x† τ e−iHT P x τ P z τ ≡e −iH(1)T , U2 =P z† τ P z† σ e−iH J K T P z σ P z τ ≡e −iH(2) J+K K T ,(S.20) U3 =P x† τ P z† σ e−iHT P z σ P x τ ≡e −iH(3)T , UF =U 0U1U2U3U2U3U0U1 ≡e −iQF TF , whereH=J H LGT +KH 1 +hH 0,H LGT = P j σ+ j τ + j,j+1σ− j+1 +h.c.preserves ...
[80]

Effective Hamiltonian for the driving protocol Using the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff lemma, one can check that the effective HamiltonianQ F has the structure QF =Q (0) F +Q (1) F +· · ·, Q (n) F =O(T n F ) Q(0) F =J H LGT, (S.24) Q(1) F = 0, Q(2) F = −(J+K)J 2KT 2 F 128(J+ 2K) + (J+K)KJ 3T 2 F 768(J+ 2K) 2 [HLGT,[H LGT, H1]] + 2(J+K) 2K2J T2 F 768(J+ 2K) 2 [...

2026