pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.11856 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-13 · ⚛️ physics.flu-dyn · astro-ph.EP· astro-ph.IM· cs.NA· math.NA

RAPRAL v1.0: RAdiation Prediction using RAy tracing and Line-by-line methods for hypersonic air flows

Yuzhe Zhang , Qizhen Hong , Xiaoyong Wang , Quanhua Sun This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:00 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.flu-dyn astro-ph.EPastro-ph.IMcs.NAmath.NA
keywords radiation predictionray tracingline-by-line methodhypersonic flowsradiative heat fluxthermochemical nonequilibriumFire II experimentafterbody heating
0
0 comments X

The pith

RAPRAL combines line-by-line spectra with ray tracing to predict radiative heat flux in hypersonic air flows.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents RAPRAL as a new C++ solver that calculates radiative processes in high-temperature, nonequilibrium air by modeling detailed spectral absorption and emission line by line while tracing rays to solve the radiative transfer equation. It first verifies this by reproducing bulk spectral coefficients for atoms and molecules across various conditions, matching results from prior established codes. The solver is then used to compute afterbody radiative heating for the Fire II reentry flight using a supplied two-temperature, eleven-species flowfield. A sympathetic reader would care because radiation can dominate heat loads on spacecraft during atmospheric entry, and improved prediction tools could reduce design margins for thermal protection systems.

Core claim

RAPRAL integrates detailed line-by-line spectral modeling with a ray-tracing solution of the radiative transfer equation. When applied to predict afterbody radiative heating in the Fire II flight experiment based on a two-temperature, 11-species air flowfield, the approach yields reliable radiative heat flux predictions and captures the dominant radiation mechanisms.

What carries the argument

Line-by-line computation of atomic and molecular spectral coefficients combined with ray tracing to integrate the radiative transfer equation over space and spectrum.

If this is right

  • Bulk spectral coefficients for air species can be computed accurately over a wide range of temperatures and pressures.
  • Dominant radiation mechanisms in afterbody regions of hypersonic flows are identified and quantified.
  • The solver serves as a reliable tool for radiative heating predictions in Earth-atmosphere hypersonic entries.
  • Planned extensions will incorporate additional species for planetary entry simulations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same framework could be tested on other flight data sets to check whether spectral agreement continues to produce correct total heat loads.
  • Coupling RAPRAL directly to a flow solver instead of using a precomputed field might reveal sensitivity of heating predictions to flowfield details.
  • The ray-tracing approach may allow efficient parallelization for three-dimensional vehicle geometries.

Load-bearing premise

The supplied two-temperature, 11-species air flowfield is accurate, and matching isolated spectral coefficients guarantees correct integrated radiative heating.

What would settle it

Measurement of afterbody radiative heat flux on a different reentry vehicle where an independent, high-fidelity flowfield solution is available for direct comparison.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.11856 by Qizhen Hong, Quanhua Sun, Xiaoyong Wang, Yuzhe Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Populations of atomic N electronic states at three positions ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Effect of the line alternation factor on the emission intensity of selected bands of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Schematic of the collisional-radiative mechanisms considered in this study. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Voigt HWHM for atomic N in the 300-800 nm wavelength range under a specified condition. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison of HWHMs under thermal equilibrium at different temperatures and electron number densities. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Emission coefficients of atomic N from different transition types under the illustrated conditions. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Vector diagrams for Hund’s cases (a) and (b) [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Schematic of spatial discretization for 3D LOS generation using the Fibonacci sphere method with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: LOS projections (a) onto a 2D axisymmetric flowfield and (b) in a 3D flowfield. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Interpolation of flow variables at LOS nodes (blue squares) based on cell-centered variables (green circles) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Schematic of integrating the RTE along LOS in the ray-tracing method, with the spacing between LOS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Framework of the RAPRAL solver. 3 Results In this section, two categories of test cases are considered to assess the reliability of the present solver. The first category focuses on the bulk spectral characteristics of the major atomic and molecular radiators in air, including atomic and molecular B-B transitions. The performance of RAPRAL is evaluated through comparisons with results obtained from the Sp… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Comparison of the B-B emission spectra of atomic N predicted by Spark and RAPRAL. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Comparison of the B-B emission spectra of N [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Comparison of the B-B emission spectra of NO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Comparison of the B-B emission spectra of O [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Calorimeter measurements at different locations on the Fire II vehicle afterbody as a function of flight time, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Flowfield temperature contour around the vehicle and streamlines on the afterbody section for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Temperatures and atomic N number density distributions along four LOSs indicated in Figure 18 for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Spatial distribution of wall heat flux (with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_20.png] view at source ↗
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: LOSs used for calculating wall radiative heat flux at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_21.png] view at source ↗
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: Radiation distribution along LOS, integrated over the wavelength range [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_22.png] view at source ↗
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: Flowfield temperature contour around the vehicle and streamlines on the afterbody section for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_23.png] view at source ↗
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: Temperature and atomic N number density distributions along four LOSs indicated in Figure 23 for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_24.png] view at source ↗
Figure 25
Figure 25. Figure 25: Spatial distribution of wall heat flux (with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_25.png] view at source ↗
Figure 26
Figure 26. Figure 26: LOSs used for calculating wall radiative heat flux at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_26.png] view at source ↗
Figure 27
Figure 27. Figure 27: Radiation distribution along LOS, integrated over the wavelength range [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_27.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

A new radiation solver, RAPRAL (RAdiation Prediction based on RAy tracing and Line-by-line) implemented in C++, is developed for simulating high-temperature thermochemical nonequilibrium radiative processes. RAPRAL integrates detailed line-by-line spectral modeling with a ray-tracing solution of the radiative transfer equation, enabling accurate resolution of both spectral features and spatial radiation transport. The adopted methods and their implementation are described in detail. To assess the overall capability and accuracy of RAPRAL, we first focus on the computation of atomic and molecular bulk spectral coefficients. Through comparison with the established code in the literature, RAPRAL demonstrates its ability to accurately capture key spectral features across a wide range of conditions. Moreover, RAPRAL is applied to predict afterbody radiative heating in the Fire II flight experiment, based on a two-temperature, 11-species air flowfield. The results demonstrate that the present approach provides reliable predictions of radiative heat flux and effectively captures the dominant radiation mechanisms. Overall, the presented results demonstrate that RAPRAL is a robust tool for simulating radiative processes in hypersonic air flows, and future versions will extend its capabilities to include species relevant to planetary atmospheres.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces RAPRAL v1.0, a C++ radiation solver combining line-by-line spectral modeling with ray-tracing solution of the radiative transfer equation for thermochemical nonequilibrium hypersonic air flows. It reports qualitative agreement of atomic and molecular bulk spectral coefficients with established literature codes across a range of conditions, then applies the solver to afterbody radiative heating predictions for the Fire II flight experiment using an externally supplied two-temperature, 11-species air flowfield, concluding that the approach yields reliable radiative heat flux predictions and captures dominant mechanisms.

Significance. If the integrated flux predictions can be shown to be reliable, RAPRAL would provide a useful new open-source tool for detailed radiation modeling in hypersonic flows, with its explicit C++ implementation and combined spectral-spatial treatment offering a clear alternative to existing solvers. The detailed description of methods is a strength, but the current evidence base does not yet establish the reliability of the integrated quantities.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and Fire II results section] Abstract and Fire II results section: The claim that 'the present approach provides reliable predictions of radiative heat flux' for Fire II afterbody heating is not supported by the presented results. Only computed flux values are reported; no quantitative comparison to flight data or to benchmark codes (e.g., NEQAIR) on identical input flowfields is given. Because integrated flux depends on ray-tracing through the full spatial domain, agreement on isolated spectral coefficients does not establish accuracy of the integrated heating.
  2. [Spectral validation section] Spectral validation section: While qualitative matches to literature codes on spectral features are shown, the manuscript provides no quantitative error metrics (e.g., RMS or percentage differences) or sensitivity studies to uncertainties in the supplied 2T/11-species flowfield. This is load-bearing for the reliability claim, as the radiation module operates on externally supplied flow data whose accuracy directly determines the predicted fluxes.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract could more precisely state the specific conditions and spectral features used in the code-to-code comparisons.
  2. [Implementation and numerical methods] A table summarizing numerical parameters (e.g., ray discretization, spectral resolution) used in the ray-tracing and line-by-line calculations would improve reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive review of our manuscript on RAPRAL v1.0. We address the major comments point by point below, indicating where revisions will be made to improve the presentation and clarify the scope of the validation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and Fire II results section] Abstract and Fire II results section: The claim that 'the present approach provides reliable predictions of radiative heat flux' for Fire II afterbody heating is not supported by the presented results. Only computed flux values are reported; no quantitative comparison to flight data or to benchmark codes (e.g., NEQAIR) on identical input flowfields is given. Because integrated flux depends on ray-tracing through the full spatial domain, agreement on isolated spectral coefficients does not establish accuracy of the integrated heating.

    Authors: We agree that the phrasing 'provides reliable predictions of radiative heat flux' in the abstract and Fire II section overstates what the presented results demonstrate. The Fire II case is included as an application example using an externally supplied flowfield to illustrate the solver's use on a realistic problem and to identify dominant mechanisms, rather than as a comprehensive validation of integrated quantities. We will revise the abstract and results section to remove or qualify this claim, emphasizing instead the demonstration of the method and its ability to capture key features. We will also add a limitations paragraph noting that quantitative benchmarking of integrated fluxes against flight data or other codes on identical flowfields is not performed here. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Spectral validation section] Spectral validation section: While qualitative matches to literature codes on spectral features are shown, the manuscript provides no quantitative error metrics (e.g., RMS or percentage differences) or sensitivity studies to uncertainties in the supplied 2T/11-species flowfield. This is load-bearing for the reliability claim, as the radiation module operates on externally supplied flow data whose accuracy directly determines the predicted fluxes.

    Authors: We concur that quantitative error metrics are missing from the spectral validation section and that their addition would strengthen the assessment. We will compute and report RMS differences and/or average percentage deviations for the atomic and molecular spectral coefficient comparisons in the revised manuscript. For sensitivity to uncertainties in the supplied 2T/11-species flowfield, we will include a brief discussion of how variations in temperature and species concentrations could propagate to the radiative quantities. A full sensitivity study, however, lies beyond the scope of the present work, which centers on the radiation solver implementation and its basic validation against established spectral data. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Direct quantitative comparison of the integrated afterbody radiative heat fluxes to Fire II flight data or to benchmark codes such as NEQAIR on identical input flowfields cannot be added in the current revision, as this would require new simulations and access to matching external flowfield data and code implementations.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: radiation module computes outputs from externally supplied flowfield inputs

full rationale

The paper describes a radiation solver that takes a two-temperature, 11-species air flowfield as input and applies line-by-line spectral modeling plus ray-tracing RTE solution to produce radiative heat flux predictions. Spectral coefficient comparisons to literature codes are presented as validation of the module, but the integrated Fire II afterbody results are computed values, not fitted or redefined from those inputs. No self-definitional equations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the provided text. The derivation chain is self-contained as a forward computation tool.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard domain assumptions in hypersonic aerothermodynamics and radiative transfer; no new physical entities are introduced.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Two-temperature model for thermochemical nonequilibrium in air
    Used to generate the input flowfield for the Fire II radiative heating prediction
  • domain assumption Line-by-line spectral modeling accurately captures atomic and molecular transitions in high-temperature air
    Core assumption underlying the bulk spectral coefficient calculations

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5537 in / 1206 out tokens · 55696 ms · 2026-05-10T16:00:24.865790+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Theory of stagnation point heat transfer in dissociated air.Journal of the Aerospace Sciences, 25(2):73–85, 1958

    James A Fay and Frederick R Riddell. Theory of stagnation point heat transfer in dissociated air.Journal of the Aerospace Sciences, 25(2):73–85, 1958

    work page 1958

  2. [2]

    Critical review of stagnation point heat transfer theory

    H Hoshizaki, YS Chou, NG Kulgein, and JW Meyer. Critical review of stagnation point heat transfer theory. Technical report, NASA, 1975

    work page 1975

  3. [3]

    Data-driven modeling of hypersonic reentry flow with heat and mass transfer.AIAA Journal, 61(8):3269–3286, 2023

    Leonidas Gkimisis, Bruno Dias, James B Scoggins, Thierry Magin, Miguel A Mendez, and Alessandro Turchi. Data-driven modeling of hypersonic reentry flow with heat and mass transfer.AIAA Journal, 61(8):3269–3286, 2023

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    Catalytic wall effects for hypersonic nozzle flow in thermochemical non- equilibrium.Acta Astronautica, 203:48–59, 2023

    Odelma Teixeira and José Páscoa. Catalytic wall effects for hypersonic nozzle flow in thermochemical non- equilibrium.Acta Astronautica, 203:48–59, 2023. 33 APREPRINT- APRIL15, 2026

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    Aerodynamic heating in hypersonic shock wave and turbulent boundary layer interaction.Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 999:A66, 2024

    Zhenyuan Tang, Haonan Xu, Xueying Li, and Jing Ren. Aerodynamic heating in hypersonic shock wave and turbulent boundary layer interaction.Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 999:A66, 2024

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Features of afterbody radiative heating for earth entry.Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 52(1):105–119, 2015

    Christopher O Johnston and Aaron M Brandis. Features of afterbody radiative heating for earth entry.Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 52(1):105–119, 2015

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    Refinements to afterbody radiative heating simulations for earth entry

    Christopher O Johnston, Aaron M Brandis, and Marco Panesi. Refinements to afterbody radiative heating simulations for earth entry. In46th AIAA Thermophysics Conference, page 3693, 2016

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1966

    John J Martin.Atmospheric reentry: an introduction to its science and engineering. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1966

    work page 1966

  9. [9]

    Characterization of stagnation-point heat flux for earth entry

    Aaron M Brandis and Christopher O Johnston. Characterization of stagnation-point heat flux for earth entry. In 45th AIAA Plasmadynamics and Lasers Conference, page 2374, 2014

    work page 2014

  10. [10]

    Air radiation revisited

    Kenneth Sutton. Air radiation revisited. In19th Thermophysics Conference, page 1733, 1984

    work page 1984

  11. [11]

    The aerothermodynamic environment of the apollo command module during superorbital entry

    Dorothy B Lee and Winston D Goodrich. The aerothermodynamic environment of the apollo command module during superorbital entry. Technical report, NASA, 1972

    work page 1972

  12. [12]

    Investigation of nonequilibrium radiation for mars entry

    Aaron Brandis, Christopher Johnston, Marco Panesi, Brett Cruden, Dinesh Prabhu, and Deepak Bose. Investigation of nonequilibrium radiation for mars entry. In51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons F orum and Aerospace Exposition, page 1055, 2013

    work page 2013

  13. [13]

    Stardust: Discovery’s interstellar dust and cometary sample return mission

    Kenneth L Atkins, Donald E Brownlee, Tom Duxbury, C-W Yen, Peter Tsou, and Joseph M Vellinga. Stardust: Discovery’s interstellar dust and cometary sample return mission. In1997 IEEE Aerospace Conference, volume 4, pages 229–245. IEEE, 1997

    work page 1997

  14. [14]

    Nonequilibrium air radiation (nequair) program: User’s manual

    Chul Park. Nonequilibrium air radiation (nequair) program: User’s manual. Technical report, NASA, 1985

    work page 1985

  15. [15]

    Neqair96, nonequilibrium and equilibrium radiative transport and spectra program: User’s manual

    Ellis E Whiting, Chul Park, Yen Liu, James O Arnold, and John A Paterson. Neqair96, nonequilibrium and equilibrium radiative transport and spectra program: User’s manual. Technical report, NASA, 1996

    work page 1996

  16. [16]

    PhD thesis, The University of Queensland, 2011

    Daniel Potter.Modelling of radiating shock layers for atmospheric entry at Earth and Mars. PhD thesis, The University of Queensland, 2011

    work page 2011

  17. [17]

    Spark: a software package for aerodynamics, radiation and kinetics

    Bruno Lopez and Mario Lino Da Silva. Spark: a software package for aerodynamics, radiation and kinetics. In 46th AIAA thermophysics conference, page 4025, 2016

    work page 2016

  18. [18]

    PhD thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 2006

    Christopher Owen Johnston.Nonequilibrium shock-layer radiative heating for Earth and Titan entry. PhD thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 2006

    work page 2006

  19. [19]

    Optical diagnostics of atmospheric pressure air plasmas.Plasma Sources Science and Technology, 12(2):125–138, 2003

    Christophe O Laux, TG Spence, CH Kruger, and RN Zare. Optical diagnostics of atmospheric pressure air plasmas.Plasma Sources Science and Technology, 12(2):125–138, 2003

    work page 2003

  20. [20]

    Number 669

    Kazuhisa Fujita and Takashi Abe.SPRADIAN, structured package for radiation analysis: Theory and application. Number 669. Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, 1997

    work page 1997

  21. [21]

    Radis: A nonequilibrium line-by-line radiative code for co2 and hitran-like database species.Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 222:12–25, 2019

    Erwan Pannier and Christophe O Laux. Radis: A nonequilibrium line-by-line radiative code for co2 and hitran-like database species.Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 222:12–25, 2019

    work page 2019

  22. [22]

    PhD thesis, School of Engineering, The University of Queensland, 2008

    Rowan Gollan.Computational Modelling of High-temperature Gas Effects with Application to Hypersonic Flows. PhD thesis, School of Engineering, The University of Queensland, 2008

    work page 2008

  23. [23]

    The eilmer user guide

    Rowan J Gollan, Peter A Jacobs, Nicholas N Gibbons, and Kyle A Damm. The eilmer user guide. Technical report, The University of Queensland, 2026

    work page 2026

  24. [24]

    Gas dynamics toolkit (gdtk)

    University of Queensland. Gas dynamics toolkit (gdtk). https://gdtk.uqcloud.net/. Accessed: 2026-04-05

    work page 2026

  25. [25]

    Uncertainty quantification in electronic state-specific modeling of high-enthalpy nitrogen flows.AIAA Journal, 63(10):4479–4486, 2025

    Yuzhe Zhang, Qizhen Hong, Xiaoyong Wang, Chao Yang, and Quanhua Sun. Uncertainty quantification in electronic state-specific modeling of high-enthalpy nitrogen flows.AIAA Journal, 63(10):4479–4486, 2025

    work page 2025

  26. [26]

    Read Books Ltd, 2013

    Gerhard Herzberg.Molecular Spectra and molecular structure-V ol I, volume 1. Read Books Ltd, 2013

    work page 2013

  27. [27]

    Wiley, New York, 1989

    Chul Park.Nonequilibrium hypersonic aerothermodynamics. Wiley, New York, 1989

    work page 1989

  28. [28]

    Wiley, New York, 1966

    Walter G Vincenti, Charles H Kruger Jr, and T Teichmann.Introduction to physical gas dynamics. Wiley, New York, 1966

    work page 1966

  29. [29]

    Academic press, 2003

    Michael F Modest.Radiative heat transfer. Academic press, 2003

    work page 2003

  30. [30]

    Radiative transfer in lte air plasmas for temperatures up to 15,000 k.Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 77(2):113–130, 2003

    Sophie Chauveau, Christine Deron, Marie-Yvonne Perrin, Philippe Rivière, and Anouar Soufiani. Radiative transfer in lte air plasmas for temperatures up to 15,000 k.Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 77(2):113–130, 2003. 34 APREPRINT- APRIL15, 2026

    work page 2003

  31. [31]

    Kramida, Yu

    A. Kramida, Yu. Ralchenko, J. Reader, and and NIST ASD Team. NIST Atomic Spectra Database (ver. 5.12), [Online]. Available: https://physics.nist.gov/asd [2025, November 6]. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD., 2024

    work page 2025

  32. [32]

    Springer Science & Business Media, 2007

    Gordon WF Drake.Springer handbook of atomic, molecular , and optical physics. Springer Science & Business Media, 2007

    work page 2007

  33. [33]

    Line-by-line transport calculations for jupiter entry probes

    JO Arnold, DM Cooper, Chul Park, and SG Prakash. Line-by-line transport calculations for jupiter entry probes. In American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Thermophysics Conference, number AIAA PAPER 79-1082, page 58, 1979

    work page 1979

  34. [34]

    On-line Resources, 2009

    The Opacity Project Team.https://cds.unistra.fr//topbase/topbase.html. On-line Resources, 2009

    work page 2009

  35. [35]

    Continuous absorption coefficients for non-hydrogenic atoms.Memoirs of the Royal Astronomical Society, V ol

    G Peach. Continuous absorption coefficients for non-hydrogenic atoms.Memoirs of the Royal Astronomical Society, V ol. 73, p. 1, 73:1–123, 1970

    work page 1970

  36. [36]

    Forrest R Gilmore, Russ R Laher, and Patrick J Espy. Franck–condon factors, r-centroids, electronic transition moments, and einstein coefficients for many nitrogen and oxygen band systems.Journal of physical and chemical reference data, 21(5):1005–1107, 1992

    work page 1992

  37. [37]

    Radiative transition probabilities of diatomic N2, O2, N + 2 and NO in air plasmas.Physica Scripta, 96(12):125402, 2021

    Rihui Liang, Yanming Liu, and Fangyan Li. Radiative transition probabilities of diatomic N2, O2, N + 2 and NO in air plasmas.Physica Scripta, 96(12):125402, 2021

    work page 2021

  38. [38]

    On-line Resources, 2025

    The NIST Team.https://webbook.nist.gov/chemistry/form-ser/. On-line Resources, 2025

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    Line by line calculation of spectra from diatomic molecules and atoms assuming a voigt line profile.Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 9(6):775–798, 1969

    JO Arnold, EE Whiting, and GC Lyle. Line by line calculation of spectra from diatomic molecules and atoms assuming a voigt line profile.Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 9(6):775–798, 1969

    work page 1969

  40. [40]

    Academiai Kiado, 1969

    István Kovács.Rotational structure in the spectra of diatomic molecules. Academiai Kiado, 1969

    work page 1969

  41. [41]

    Impact of non-tangent-slab radiative transport on flowfield– radiation coupling.Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 55(4):899–913, 2018

    Christopher O Johnston and Alireza Mazaheri. Impact of non-tangent-slab radiative transport on flowfield– radiation coupling.Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 55(4):899–913, 2018

    work page 2018

  42. [42]

    Measurement of areas on a sphere using fibonacci and latitude–longitude lattices.Mathematical Geosciences, 42(1):49–64, 2010

    Álvaro González. Measurement of areas on a sphere using fibonacci and latitude–longitude lattices.Mathematical Geosciences, 42(1):49–64, 2010

    work page 2010

  43. [43]

    Validation of high-temperature air reaction and relaxation models using emission data.Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer, 33(3):606–616, 2019

    Sergey F Gimelshein and Ingrid J Wysong. Validation of high-temperature air reaction and relaxation models using emission data.Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer, 33(3):606–616, 2019

    work page 2019

  44. [44]

    Modeling of no emissions from a hypersonic ground- based facility

    Ozgur Tumuklu, Matthew Jouffray, and Deborah A Levin. Modeling of no emissions from a hypersonic ground- based facility. InAIAA Scitech 2021 F orum, page 0105, 2021

    work page 2021

  45. [45]

    Radiation measurements of shockwaves in synthetic air and pure nitrogen

    Alex B Glenn, Orin Varley, Peter Collen, and Matthew McGilvray. Radiation measurements of shockwaves in synthetic air and pure nitrogen. InAIAA SCITECH 2024 F orum, page 0226, 2024

    work page 2024

  46. [46]

    Measurement of radiative non-equilibrium for air shocks between 7-9 km/s

    Brett A Cruden and Aaron M Brandis. Measurement of radiative non-equilibrium for air shocks between 7-9 km/s. In47th AIAA Thermophysics Conference, page 4535, 2017

    work page 2017

  47. [47]

    Analysis of shockwave radiation data in nitrogen

    Brett A Cruden and Aaron M Brandis. Analysis of shockwave radiation data in nitrogen. InAIAA Aviation 2019 F orum, page 3359, 2019

    work page 2019

  48. [48]

    Contributions of diatomic molecular electronic systems to heated air radiation.Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 72(4):503–530, 2002

    S Chauveau, M-Y Perrin, Ph Riviere, and A Soufiani. Contributions of diatomic molecular electronic systems to heated air radiation.Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 72(4):503–530, 2002

    work page 2002

  49. [49]

    Project FIRE integrated post flight evaluation report, flight no

    MA Minovitch. Project FIRE integrated post flight evaluation report, flight no. II.NASA Contractor Report, page 05936, 1965

    work page 1965

  50. [50]

    Flight parameters and vehicle performance for project Fire flight II, launched may 22, 1965

    John H Lewis Jr and William I Scallion. Flight parameters and vehicle performance for project Fire flight II, launched may 22, 1965. Technical report, NASA, 1966

    work page 1965

  51. [51]

    Calorimeter heating rates measured during project FIRE II reentry at 11.35 kilometers per second,".NASA TM X-1305, National Air and Space Administration, 1966

    ES Cornette and Forebody Temperatures. Calorimeter heating rates measured during project FIRE II reentry at 11.35 kilometers per second,".NASA TM X-1305, National Air and Space Administration, 1966

    work page 1966

  52. [52]

    Project Fire flight 2 afterbody temperatures and pressures at 11.35 kilometers per second (37,200 feet per second)

    T Slocumb. Project Fire flight 2 afterbody temperatures and pressures at 11.35 kilometers per second (37,200 feet per second). Technical report, NASA, 1966

    work page 1966

  53. [53]

    Radiative heating results from the FIRE II flight experiment at a reentry velocity of 11.4 kilometers per second

    Dona L Cauchon. Radiative heating results from the FIRE II flight experiment at a reentry velocity of 11.4 kilometers per second. Technical report, NASA, 1967

    work page 1967

  54. [54]

    FIRE ii calculations for hypersonic nonequilibrium aerothermodynamics code verification: Dplr, laura, and us3d

    David Hash, Joseph Olejniczak, Michael Wright, Dinesh Prabhu, Maria Pulsonetti, Brian Hollis, Peter Gnoffo, Michael Barnhardt, Ioannis Nompelis, and Graham Candler. FIRE ii calculations for hypersonic nonequilibrium aerothermodynamics code verification: Dplr, laura, and us3d. In45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, page 605, 2007. 35 APREPRINT...

    work page 2007

  55. [55]

    On the accuracy of two-temperature models for hypersonic nonequilibrium flow.Acta Mechanica Sinica, 39(2):122193, 2023

    Xiaoyong Wang, Qizhen Hong, Yuan Hu, and Quanhua Sun. On the accuracy of two-temperature models for hypersonic nonequilibrium flow.Acta Mechanica Sinica, 39(2):122193, 2023

    work page 2023

  56. [56]

    Chemical-kinetic parameters of hyperbolic earth entry.Journal of Thermophysics and Heat transfer, 15(1):76–90, 2001

    Chul Park, Richard L Jaffe, and Harry Partridge. Chemical-kinetic parameters of hyperbolic earth entry.Journal of Thermophysics and Heat transfer, 15(1):76–90, 2001

    work page 2001

  57. [57]

    AIAA, 1966

    Elden S Cornette.F orebody temperatures and calorimeter heating rates measured during project FIRE 2 reentry at 11.35 kilometers per second. AIAA, 1966

    work page 1966

  58. [58]

    Modification of chemical-kinetic parameters for 11-air species in re-entry flows

    Jae Gang Kim and Sung Min Jo. Modification of chemical-kinetic parameters for 11-air species in re-entry flows. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 169:120950, 2021

    work page 2021

  59. [59]

    Total heat transfer measurements on a flight investigation of reentry environment model.Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 50(3):494–503, 2013

    Bianca R Capra and Richard G Morgan. Total heat transfer measurements on a flight investigation of reentry environment model.Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 50(3):494–503, 2013

    work page 2013

  60. [60]

    Features of afterbody radiative heating for titan entry

    Christopher O Johnston, Thomas K West, and Aaron M Brandis. Features of afterbody radiative heating for titan entry. InAIAA Aviation 2019 F orum, page 3010, 2019

    work page 2019

  61. [61]

    Features of afterbody radiative heating for jupiter entry

    Aaron J Erb, Thomas K West, and Christopher O Johnston. Features of afterbody radiative heating for jupiter entry. InAIAA SciTech F orum and Exposition, 2021

    work page 2021

  62. [62]

    Convective and radiative heat transfer analysis for the fire ii forebody

    Robert B Greendyke and Lin C Hartung. Convective and radiative heat transfer analysis for the fire ii forebody. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 31(6):986–992, 1994. 36

    work page 1994