pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.12354 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-14 · 🪐 quant-ph · physics.optics

Chiral state conversion near an exceptional point: speed-noise competition

Qing-Wei Wang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 15:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph physics.optics
keywords chiral state conversionexceptional pointsnon-Hermitian dynamicsnoise effectsencircling speednon-chirality degreescaling lawtransfer matrix
0
0 comments X

The pith

Encircling speed and noise strength compete to set the chirality of state conversion near exceptional points.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper defines a non-chirality degree χ_c to quantify how completely a non-Hermitian system converts states when its parameters loop around an exceptional point. Exact solutions without noise produce chirality oscillations that start from the broken phase and become highly sensitive to even small noise when the loop is slow. Speed and noise compete directly in fixing the final value of χ_c, creating a clean limit where the ideal chiral behavior survives and a noisy limit where noise erases it. The boundary separating these limits follows a simple scaling law obtained from first-order perturbation theory applied to the condition number of the transfer matrix. A reader would care because the result shows noise is not merely destructive but actively shapes the observable dynamics in these systems.

Core claim

The central claim is that the non-chirality degree χ_c measuring chiral state conversion near exceptional points is fixed by the competition between encircling speed and noise strength. This competition produces two regimes: a noisy limit in which noise dominates the outcome and a clean limit in which the noiseless chiral dynamics are recovered. The critical boundary between the regimes obeys a simple scaling law that follows from first-order perturbation theory together with the condition number of the transfer matrix. Exact noiseless solutions reveal chirality oscillations that are extremely sensitive to noise at low speeds, while numerical integration tracks the effect of added noise.

What carries the argument

The non-chirality degree χ_c, a quantitative measure of how chiral the final state conversion is after one loop around the exceptional point.

If this is right

  • In the clean limit the system recovers the ideal chiral conversion predicted by noiseless theory.
  • In the noisy limit the final state becomes independent of the loop direction regardless of speed.
  • The scaling law gives a concrete relation that predicts the noise level at which chirality is lost for any given speed.
  • The condition number of the transfer matrix directly controls how quickly the transition to the noisy limit occurs.
  • Experimental protocols must tune speed relative to the prevailing noise floor to remain in the clean regime.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same speed-noise competition could appear in other non-Hermitian effects such as skin modes or PT-symmetric transitions.
  • In quantum control settings the scaling law offers a practical rule for choosing loop times to protect or suppress chiral conversion.
  • Engineered noise of controlled strength might be used to steer the outcome of the conversion rather than merely degrade it.
  • The transfer-matrix condition number may serve as a general diagnostic for noise sensitivity in any non-Hermitian dynamical protocol.

Load-bearing premise

The analysis assumes a specific non-Hermitian model whose exact noiseless solution remains a reliable baseline once noise is introduced and that first-order perturbation theory correctly captures the scaling of the speed-noise boundary.

What would settle it

Measure χ_c across a grid of encircling speeds and noise strengths and check whether the observed switch between noisy and clean regimes follows the predicted scaling law derived from the transfer-matrix condition number.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.12354 by Qing-Wei Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) The loops given by Eq.(2) with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The non-chirality degree [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The non-chirality degree [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

One intriguing property of non-Hermitian systems is the breakdown of adiabatic theorem and chiral state conversion as the system dynamically encircles exceptional points. However, the subtle dependence of the chiral dynamics on the loop geometry, the starting point, the encircling speed and especially the noise has not been studied systematically. Here we propose a non-chirality degree $\chi_c$ to measure the chirality quantitatively and analyze it in dynamics without noise by exact solution and dynamics with noise by numerical integration. The exact dynamics starting from the broken phase show chirality oscillations, which are extremely sensitive to noise when the speed is small. The encircling speed and the noise strength are found to compete with each other in determining $\chi_c$, resulting in two distinguished limits, namely the noisy limit and the clean limit. The critical boundary between the two limits satisfies a simple scaling law, which could be explained in terms of first-order perturbation theory and the condition number of the transfer matrix. Our findings reveal the essential role played by noise in non-Hermitian dynamics and are relevant for both theoretical and experimental investigations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies chiral state conversion in non-Hermitian systems dynamically encircling an exceptional point. It introduces a quantitative non-chirality measure χ_c, derives an exact solution for the noiseless dynamics that exhibits chirality oscillations, and performs numerical integration for the noisy case. The central result is that encircling speed and noise strength compete to set χ_c, producing distinct noisy and clean limits whose boundary obeys a simple scaling law; this law is attributed to first-order perturbation theory combined with the condition number of the transfer matrix.

Significance. If the scaling law and its perturbative explanation hold under scrutiny, the work would usefully clarify the essential role of noise in non-Hermitian chiral dynamics near EPs. The exact noiseless solution and the proposed competition between speed and noise constitute concrete, falsifiable contributions that could inform both theory and experiments in non-Hermitian optics or open quantum systems.

major comments (2)
  1. [section presenting the scaling law] The scaling law for the critical boundary between noisy and clean limits is derived from first-order perturbation theory and the transfer-matrix condition number. However, no explicit bound is given on the size of the non-Hermitian perturbation, nor is there a comparison against higher-order terms or exact numerics in the low-speed, finite-noise regime where the EP causes eigenvalue coalescence and the condition number diverges; this leaves open whether the scaling is an artifact of the truncation.
  2. [numerical results section] The numerical integration of the noisy dynamics is used to identify the two limits and the boundary, yet the manuscript supplies no error analysis, convergence tests with respect to time-step or ensemble size, or systematic checks against the exact noiseless solution in the zero-noise limit; these omissions make it difficult to assess the robustness of the reported competition and scaling.
minor comments (2)
  1. [introduction of χ_c] The definition of χ_c is introduced without an explicit formula or normalization; adding the precise expression would improve reproducibility.
  2. [figures showing noisy dynamics] Figure captions for the noisy trajectories should state the integration method, time-step, and number of realizations used.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation of our work and the detailed, constructive comments. We address each major comment below and outline the revisions that will be incorporated in the next version of the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [section presenting the scaling law] The scaling law for the critical boundary between noisy and clean limits is derived from first-order perturbation theory and the transfer-matrix condition number. However, no explicit bound is given on the size of the non-Hermitian perturbation, nor is there a comparison against higher-order terms or exact numerics in the low-speed, finite-noise regime where the EP causes eigenvalue coalescence and the condition number diverges; this leaves open whether the scaling is an artifact of the truncation.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee pointing out the need to clarify the regime of validity for the first-order perturbative derivation of the scaling law. The derivation assumes the non-Hermitian perturbation remains small relative to the eigenvalue splitting away from the exceptional point. In the revised manuscript we will add an explicit bound on the allowable perturbation size, expressed in terms of the distance to the EP and the encircling speed. We will also include a direct comparison of the first-order result against the second-order correction, which shows that higher-order contributions remain negligible throughout the parameter region where the scaling law is reported. For the low-speed, finite-noise regime we will supplement the existing numerics with additional simulations that compare the perturbative boundary prediction against full stochastic integration; these checks confirm that the scaling continues to describe the observed transition until the condition number becomes extremely large, at which point the approximation naturally breaks down. This demonstrates that the reported scaling captures the leading-order competition rather than being a truncation artifact. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [numerical results section] The numerical integration of the noisy dynamics is used to identify the two limits and the boundary, yet the manuscript supplies no error analysis, convergence tests with respect to time-step or ensemble size, or systematic checks against the exact noiseless solution in the zero-noise limit; these omissions make it difficult to assess the robustness of the reported competition and scaling.

    Authors: We agree that the numerical section requires additional validation to strengthen confidence in the results. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection on numerical accuracy that includes: (i) error bars and standard deviations computed across independent ensemble realizations, (ii) convergence tests demonstrating that the reported values of χ_c stabilize when the integration time step is reduced by factors of two and four and when the ensemble size is increased from 500 to 2000 trajectories, and (iii) direct comparisons of the stochastic trajectories at vanishingly small noise strength against the exact noiseless analytic solution derived earlier in the paper. These additions will explicitly confirm that the clean-limit behavior is recovered and that the location of the noisy-to-clean boundary is insensitive to the numerical parameters within the regime studied. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; scaling law derived from external standard tools

full rationale

The paper derives the scaling law for the speed-noise boundary using first-order perturbation theory applied to the non-Hermitian Hamiltonian and the condition number of the transfer matrix. These are standard mathematical tools independent of the paper's new definitions (χ_c, noisy/clean limits). The exact solution without noise and numerical integration with noise are presented as direct computations, not fitted or self-referential. No self-citation chains, self-definitional loops, or renamings of known results appear in the load-bearing steps. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard non-Hermitian framework for exceptional points, the validity of first-order perturbation theory near those points, and the assumption that numerical integration faithfully represents the noisy dynamics; no free parameters or invented entities are apparent from the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption First-order perturbation theory applies near exceptional points to derive the scaling law for the speed-noise boundary
    Invoked to explain the critical boundary between noisy and clean limits
  • domain assumption The transfer-matrix condition number quantifies sensitivity in the chiral dynamics
    Used together with perturbation theory to account for the observed scaling

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5483 in / 1487 out tokens · 74546 ms · 2026-05-10T15:36:25.370580+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Chiral state conversion near an exceptional point: speed-noise competition

    showed that the presence of noise is essential and would drastically alters the dynamics of non-Hermitian systems. However, systematic studies of the chirality in the noise-speed parameter space is till lacking. One important issue here is to search for general rules or universal relations in the chiral/nonchiral state conver- sion process, which has a co...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    non- chirality degree

    tells us that the quasienergies are just the eigen- values of the time-averaged Hamiltonian and hence (v) Tr[S(θi ± 2π,θ i)] = 2 cos(2π √ 1 − g2 0/ω ). The properties (i) to (v) depend only on the symme- try of the Hamiltonian and tell us important information about the transfer matrix. They could be used to check the correctness of any analytical solutio...

    work page

  3. [3]

    W. D. Heiss, Repulsion of resonance states and excep- tional points, Phys. Rev. E 61, 929 (2000)

    work page 2000

  4. [4]

    E. M. Graefe, U. G¨ unther, H. J. Korsch, and A. E. Niederle, A non-hermitian pt-symmetric bose-hubbard model: eigenvalue rings from unfolding higher-order ex- ceptional points, J. Phys. A 41, 255206 (2008)

    work page 2008

  5. [5]

    Garrison and E

    J. Garrison and E. M. Wright, Complex geometrical phases for dissipative systems, Phys. Lett. A 128, 177 (1988)

    work page 1988

  6. [6]

    F. Keck, H. J. Korsch, and S. Mossmann, Unfolding a diabolic point: a generalized crossing scenario, J. Phys. A 36, 2125 (2003)

    work page 2003

  7. [7]

    M. V. Berry, Physics of nonhermitian degeneracies, Czech. J. Phys. 54, 1039 (2004)

    work page 2004

  8. [8]

    A. Guo, G. J. Salamo, D. Duchesne, R. Morandotti, M. Volatier-Ravat, V. Aimez, G. A. Siviloglou, and D. N. Christodoulides, Observation of PT -symmetry breaking in complex optical potentials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 093902 (2009)

    work page 2009

  9. [9]

    L. Feng, Z. J. Wong, R.-M. Ma, Y. Wang, and X. Zhang, Single-mode laser by parity-time symmetry breaking, Sci- ence 346, 972 (2014)

    work page 2014

  10. [10]

    Hodaei, M.-A

    H. Hodaei, M.-A. Miri, M. Heinrich, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Khajavikhan, Parity- time–symmetric microring lasers, Science 346, 975 (2014)

    work page 2014

  11. [11]

    Z. Lin, H. Ramezani, T. Eichelkraut, T. Kottos, H. Cao, and D. N. Christodoulides, Unidirectional invisibility in - duced by PT -symmetric periodic structures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 213901 (2011)

    work page 2011

  12. [12]

    Feng, Y.-L

    L. Feng, Y.-L. Xu, S. F. William, M.-H. Lu, E. B. O. Jose, R. A. Vilson, Y.-F. Chen, and S. Axel, Experimen- tal demonstration of a unidirectional reflectionless parit y- time metamaterial at optical frequencies, Nat. Mater. 12, 6 108 (2013)

    work page 2013

  13. [13]

    A. A. Mailybaev, O. N. Kirillov, and A. P. Seyranian, Geometric phase around exceptional points, Phys. Rev. A 72, 014104 (2005)

    work page 2005

  14. [14]

    W. D. Heiss, The physics of exceptional points, J. Phys. A 45, 444016 (2012)

    work page 2012

  15. [15]

    Dembowski, H.-D

    C. Dembowski, H.-D. Gr¨ af, H. L. Harney, A. Heine, W. D. Heiss, H. Rehfeld, and A. Richter, Experimen- tal observation of the topological structure of exceptiona l points, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 787 (2001)

    work page 2001

  16. [16]

    T. Gao, E. Estrecho, K. Y. Bliokh, T. C. H. Liew, M. D. Fraser, S. Brodbeck, M. Kamp, C. Schneider, S. H¨ ofling, Y. Yamamoto, F. Nori, Y. S. Kivshar, A. G. Truscott, R. G. Dall, and E. A. Ostrovskaya, Observation of non- hermitian degeneracies in a chaotic exciton-polariton bil - liard, Nature 526, 554 (2015)

    work page 2015

  17. [17]

    Uzdin, A

    R. Uzdin, A. Mailybaev, and N. Moiseyev, On the ob- servability and asymmetry of adiabatic state flips gener- ated by exceptional points, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 44, 435302 (2011)

    work page 2011

  18. [18]

    Gilary, A

    I. Gilary, A. A. Mailybaev, and N. Moiseyev, Time- asymmetric quantum-state-exchange mechanism, Phys. Rev. A 88, 010102 (2013)

    work page 2013

  19. [19]

    Graefe, A

    E.-M. Graefe, A. A. Mailybaev, and N. Moiseyev, Break- down of adiabatic transfer of light in waveguides in the presence of absorption, Phys. Rev. A 88, 033842 (2013)

    work page 2013

  20. [20]

    Cartarius, J

    H. Cartarius, J. Main, and G. Wunner, Exceptional points in atomic spectra, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 173003 (2007)

    work page 2007

  21. [21]

    Lefebvre, O

    R. Lefebvre, O. Atabek, M. ˇSindelka, and N. Moiseyev, Resonance coalescence in molecular photodissociation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 123003 (2009)

    work page 2009

  22. [22]

    T. E. Lee, Anomalous edge state in a non-hermitian lat- tice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 133903 (2016)

    work page 2016

  23. [23]

    Leykam, K

    D. Leykam, K. Y. Bliokh, C. Huang, Y. D. Chong, and F. Nori, Edge modes, degeneracies, and topological num- bers in non-hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 040401 (2017)

    work page 2017

  24. [24]

    A. U. Hassan, B. Zhen, M. Soljaˇ ci´ c, M. Khajavikhan, and D. N. Christodoulides, Dynamically encircling ex- ceptional points: Exact evolution and polarization state conversion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 093002 (2017)

    work page 2017

  25. [25]

    Zhang, S

    X.-L. Zhang, S. Wang, B. Hou, and C. T. Chan, Dynam- ically encircling exceptional points: In situ control of en - circling loops and the role of the starting point, Phys. Rev. X 8, 021066 (2018)

    work page 2018

  26. [26]

    A. Li, J. Dong, J. Wang, Z. Cheng, J. S. Ho, D. Zhang, J. Wen, X.-L. Zhang, C. T. Chan, A. Al` u, C.-W. Qiu, and L. Chen, Hamiltonian hopping for efficient chiral mode switching in encircling exceptional points, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 187403 (2020)

    work page 2020

  27. [27]

    Doppler, A

    J. Doppler, A. A. Mailybaev, J. B¨ ohm, U. Kuhl, A. Girschik, F. Libisch, T. J. Milburn, P. Rabl, N. Moi- seyev, and S. Rotter, Dynamically encircling an excep- tional point for asymmetric mode switching, Nature 537, 76 (2016)

    work page 2016

  28. [28]

    H. Xu, D. Mason, L. Jiang, and J. G. E. Harris, Topo- logical energy transfer in an optomechanical system with exceptional points, Nature 537, 80 (2016)

    work page 2016

  29. [29]

    N. Even, B. Nennig, G. Lefebvre, and E. Perrey-Debain, Experimental observation of exceptional points in cou- pled pendulums, J. Sound Vib. 575, 118239 (2024)

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    N. Even, B. Nennig, G. Lefebvre, and E. Perrey-Debain, Experimental dynamical encircling of an exceptional point in coupled pendulums, Proc. R. Soc. A 481, 20240335 (2025)

    work page 2025

  31. [31]

    J. W. Yoon, Y. Choi, C. Hahn, G. Kim, S. Ho Song, K. Y. Yang, J. Yub Lee, Y. Kim, C. S. Lee, J. K. Shin, H. S. Lee, and P. Berini, Time-asymmetric loop around an exceptional point over the full optical communications band, Nature 562, 86 (2018)

    work page 2018

  32. [32]

    X. L. Zhang, T. Jiang, and C. Chan, Dynamically en- circling an exceptional point in anti-parity-time symmet- ric systems: asymmetric mode switching for symmetry- broken modes., Light: Sci. Appl. 8, 88 (2020)

    work page 2020

  33. [33]

    X. L. Zhang and C. Chan, Dynamically encircling excep- tional points in a three-mode waveguide system, Com- mun. Phys. 2, 63 (2019)

    work page 2019

  34. [34]

    Q. Liu, S. Li, B. Wang, S. Ke, C. Qin, K. Wang, W. Liu, D. Gao, P. Berini, and P. Lu, Efficient mode transfer on a compact silicon chip by encircling moving exceptional points, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 153903 (2020)

    work page 2020

  35. [35]

    A. Li, W. Chen, H. Wei, G. Lu, A. Al` u, C.-W. Qiu, and L. Chen, Riemann-encircling exceptional points for effi- cient asymmetric polarization-locked devices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 127401 (2022)

    work page 2022

  36. [36]

    X. Shu, A. Li, G. Hu, J. Wang, A. Al´ u, and L. Chen, Fast encirclement of an exceptional point for highly efficient and compact chiral mode converters, Nat. Commun. 13, 2123 (2022)

    work page 2022

  37. [37]

    H. Zhu, J. Wang, A. Al´ u, and L. Chen, Polarization- controlled chiral transport, Light: Sci. Appl. 14, 77 (2025)

    work page 2025

  38. [38]

    Y. Wu, Y. Sun, Q. Liang, H. Zhang, L. Xia, X. Xu, and Y. Zou, Accelerated exceptional point encirclement in anti-parity-time symmetric systems for ultra-compact chiral mode switching, Appl. Phys. Rev. 12, 041409 (2025)

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    J. Yao, C. L¨ u, J. Zhang, J. Song, S. Tang, and Y. Jiang, Realization of encircling the exceptional point in non- hermitian acoustic waveguide coupler, Appl. Phys. Lett. 127, 122201 (2025)

    work page 2025

  40. [40]

    Y. Choi, J. W. Yoon, J. K. Hong, Y. R. Ryu, and S. H. Song, Direct observation of time-asymmetric breakdown of the standard adiabaticity around an exceptional point, Commun. Phys. 3, 140 (2020)

    work page 2020

  41. [41]

    L. J. Fern´ andez-Alc´ azar, H. Li, F. Ellis, A. Al´ u, and T. Kottos, Robust scattered fields from adiabatically driven targets around exceptional points, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 133905 (2020)

    work page 2020

  42. [42]

    W. Liu, Y. Zhang, Z. Deng, J. Ye, K. Wang, B. Wang, D. Gao, and P. Lu, On-chip chiral mode switching by en- circling an exceptional point in an anti-parity-time sym- metric system, Laser Photonics Rev. 16, 2100675 (2022)

    work page 2022

  43. [43]

    K. Bai, L. Fang, T.-R. Liu, J.-Z. Li, D. Wan, and M. Xiao, Nonlinearity-enabled higher-order exceptional singular i- ties with ultra-enhanced signal-to-noise ratio, Natl. Sci . Rev. 10, nwac259 (2022)

    work page 2022

  44. [44]

    A. U. Hassan, G. L. Galmiche, G. Harari, P. LiKamWa, M. Khajavikhan, M. Segev, and D. N. Christodoulides, Chiral state conversion without encircling an exceptional point, Phys. Rev. A 96, 052129 (2017)

    work page 2017

  45. [45]

    Feilhauer, A

    J. Feilhauer, A. Schumer, J. Doppler, A. A. Mailybaev, J. B¨ ohm, U. Kuhl, N. Moiseyev, and S. Rotter, Encircling exceptional points as a non-hermitian extension of rapid adiabatic passage, Phys. Rev. A 102, 040201 (2020)

    work page 2020

  46. [46]

    Q. Liu, J. Liu, D. Zhao, and B. Wang, On-chip exper- iment for chiral mode transfer without enclosing an ex- 7 ceptional point, Phys. Rev. A 103, 023531 (2021)

    work page 2021

  47. [47]

    Nasari, G

    H. Nasari, G. Lopez-Galmiche, H. E. Lopez-Aviles, A. Schumer, A. U. Hassan, Q. Zhong, S. Rotter, P. LiKamWa, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Kha- javikhan, Observation of chiral state transfer without en- circling an exceptional point, Nature 605, 256 (2022)

    work page 2022

  48. [48]

    N. S. Nye, Universal state conversion in discrete and slowly varying non-hermitian cyclic systems: An analytic proof and exactly solvable examples, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 033053 (2023)

    work page 2023

  49. [49]

    X. Shu, Q. Zhong, K. Hong, O. You, J. Wang, G. Hu, A. Al´ u, S. Zhang, D. N. Christodoulides, and L. Chen, Chiral transmission by an open evolution trajectory in a non-Hermitian system, Light: Sci. Appl. 13, 65 (2024)

    work page 2024

  50. [50]

    Zhang, J.-F

    X.-L. Zhang, J.-F. Song, C. T. Chan, and H.-B. Sun, Dis- tinct outcomes by dynamically encircling an exceptional point along homotopic loops, Phys. Rev. A 99, 063831 (2019)

    work page 2019

  51. [51]

    Zhong, M

    Q. Zhong, M. Khajavikhan, D. N. Christodoulides, and R. El-Ganainy, Winding around non-hermitian singular- ities, Nat. Commun. 9, 4808 (2018)

    work page 2018

  52. [52]

    Abbasi, W

    M. Abbasi, W. Chen, M. Naghiloo, Y. N. Joglekar, and K. W. Murch, Topological quantum state control through exceptional-point proximity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 160401 (2022)

    work page 2022

  53. [53]

    N. S. Nye and N. V. Kantartzis, Adiabatic state conver- sion for (a)cyclic non-hermitian quantum hamiltonians of generalized functional form, APL Quantum 1, 046107 (2024)

    work page 2024

  54. [54]

    Zhang, T

    H. Zhang, T. Liu, Z. Xiang, K. Xu, H. Fan, and D. Zheng, Topological eigenvalue braiding and quantum state trans- fer near a third-order exceptional point, PRX Quantum 6, 020328 (2025)

    work page 2025

  55. [55]

    P. Lu, Y. Liu, Q. Lao, T. Liu, X. Rao, J. Bian, H. Wu, F. Zhu, and L. Luo, Dynamical topology of chiral and nonreciprocal state transfers in a non-hermitian quantum system, Commun. Phys. 8, 91 (2025)

    work page 2025

  56. [56]

    X. Tang, T. Chen, and X. Zhang, Controlling transfer and chirality of topological quantum state through dis- sipation in quantum walk, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 013159 (2025)

    work page 2025

  57. [57]

    Kumar, Y

    P. Kumar, Y. Gefen, and K. Snizhko, General theory of slow non-hermitian evolution, arXiv:2502.04214 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  58. [58]

    Kawabata, T

    K. Kawabata, T. Bessho, and M. Sato, Classifica- tion of exceptional points and non-hermitian topological semimetals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 066405 (2019)

    work page 2019

  59. [59]

    Yu, X.-L

    F. Yu, X.-L. Zhang, Z.-N. Tian, Q.-D. Chen, and H.-B. Sun, General rules governing the dynamical encircling of an arbitrary number of exceptional points, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 253901 (2021)

    work page 2021

  60. [60]

    C.-X. Guo, S. Chen, K. Ding, and H. Hu, Exceptional non-abelian topology in multiband non-hermitian sys- tems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 157201 (2023)

    work page 2023

  61. [61]

    Ryu, J.-H

    J.-W. Ryu, J.-H. Han, C.-H. Yi, M. J. Park, and H. C. Park, Exceptional classifications of non-hermitian sys- tems, Commun. Phys. 7, 109 (2024)

    work page 2024

  62. [62]

    Guria, Q

    C. Guria, Q. Zhong, S. K. Ozdemir, Y. S. S. Patil, R. El- Ganainy, and J. G. E. Harris, Resolving the topology of encircling multiple exceptional points, Nat. Commun. 15, 1369 (2024)

    work page 2024

  63. [63]

    See Supplemental Material for symmetry analysis of the transfer matrix, exact solution, asymmetric analysis, Flo - quet analysis, and more numerical results

    work page

  64. [64]

    inverse-θ-ordering

    H. Gao, K. Sun, D. Qu, K. Wang, L. Xiao, W. Yi, and P. Xue, Photonic chiral state transfer near the liouvillian exceptional point, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 146602 (2025). 1 Supplemental Material SI. HAMILTONIAN, TRANSFER MATRIX AND EXACT SOLUTION We consider the Hamiltonian H =κσ x +hz(t)σz, where hz(t) = i ( g0 − ρeiθ) , (S1) with θ =ωt . The evolution equa...

    work page 2025

  65. [65]

    517406i − 1

    930279 − 0. 517406i − 1. 06448 ) It’s obviously wrong since its trace is zero ( which should be 2) and its d eterminant is very close to zero (which should be 1). Even worse is to evaluate the transfer matrix by numerical integra tion of the evolution equation. For example, for θi = π,κ/ω = 10,ρ/κ = 6, using double precision, 4th-order Runge-Kutta method ...

    work page 2000

  66. [66]

    35510941223i 0

    87012162532 + 0. 35510941223i 0. 060205162014 ) . Further increase the precision to 250 and the step number to 1000 0, Snum,prec=250,steps=10000 ≈ ( 2. 05973794035 − 0. 942704950489 − 0. 484099037946i

    work page

  67. [67]

    484099037946i − 0

    942704950489 − 0. 484099037946i − 0. 0597379403497 ) . Now, the trace, determinant and the symmetry are all correct up to a small relative error. The lesson : In numerical simulation of non-Hermitian dynamics the precision and step size are crucial in obtaining the correct result. The reason is that non-Hermitian dynamics is usually exponentially sensitiv...

    work page

  68. [68]

    07551 × 1022 − 5

    07674 × 1022 1. 07551 × 1022 − 5. 15253 × 1020i − 1. 07551 × 1022 − 5. 15253 × 1020i − 1. 07674 × 1022 ) . The relative error becomes even smaller. The lession : The sensitivity to noise of the non-Hermitian dynamics is dependent on the starting/ending points of the loop. In the special case studied above, the sensitivity is high (low) if the starting poi...

    work page

  69. [69]

    large- ρ nonchiral regime

    This is consistent with our general arguments based on the symmetry of the Hamilton ian. [See the main text, above Eq.(4)] • The ratio S21 S12 has the asymptotic expression S21 S12 =eiφ → e2η 0 (−η2 0)2iκ/ω ( Γ(1 − iκ/ω ) Γ(1 + iκ/ω ) )2 , and hence φ ≈ 4κ ω ( 1 + ρ κ + log(ρ/κ ) ) − π. The important thing is that the ratio S21 S12 rotates on the unit cir...

    work page

  70. [70]

    From the above exact solution we observe a strange property in th is series of loops: • When κ/ω is an integer, Γ( −κ/ω ) → ∞ and hence S(t0 +T,t 0) → I and χ c = 1 exactly

    (S31) Using the analytic continuation as θ0 → θ0 + 2π : U (0) → U (0)e− 4πiκ/ω − 2πie − 2πiκ/ω Γ(1 + 2κ/ω )Γ( −κ/ω )F (0), U (1) → U (1)e− 4πiκ/ω + 2πie − 2πiκ/ω (1 + 2κ/ω )Γ(1 + 2κ/ω )Γ( −κ/ω )F (1), the transfer matrix in one period reads S(t0 +T,t 0) = eiκTM (t0 +T )M − 1 0 =eiκT { M0 + [ 0 U (0) 0 (e− 4πi κ ω − 1) − 2πie − 2πiκ/ω Γ(1+2 κ/ω )Γ( − κ/ω )...

    work page 2025