pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.12583 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-14 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · cond-mat.mes-hall· cond-mat.other

Electrochemical Performance of Gold Monolayers for Lithium-Ion Batteries: A First Principles Study

Ajay Kumar , Pritam Samanta , Prakash Parida This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 15:41 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.other
keywords goldenelithium-ion batteryanode materialfirst principlesdensity functional theoryvolumetric capacitydiffusion barriermonolayer gold
0
0 comments X

The pith

Two goldene monolayer phases are calculated to deliver volumetric capacities of 0.713 and 0.783 Ah/cm³ with lithium diffusion barriers as low as 15 meV when used as battery anodes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper applies first-principles calculations to assess two structural variants of a recently made gold monolayer, goldene, for lithium-ion battery anodes. Goldene-I uses a triangular gold lattice and shows an extremely low energy barrier for lithium movement across the sheet. Goldene-II adds periodic pores formed by mixed triangular and hexagonal motifs and stores more lithium per unit volume while remaining stable. Both phases are metallic, which aids electron flow, and they bind lithium with energies that support reversible insertion. A reader would care because these numbers suggest a path to anodes that combine high energy density with fast charging rates.

Core claim

The authors introduce goldene-I and goldene-II as candidate anode materials and show through density functional theory that goldene-II reaches a volumetric capacity of 0.783 Ah/cm³ while goldene-I exhibits a diffusion barrier of only 15 meV. Both structures preserve mechanical integrity under lithium adsorption, display metallic band structures, and exhibit favorable adsorption energies and charge transfer characteristics.

What carries the argument

First-principles density functional theory evaluation of lithium adsorption energies, diffusion energy barriers, electronic density of states, and volumetric capacity on the triangular and pore-containing goldene lattices.

If this is right

  • Goldene-II could provide higher lithium storage per volume than many conventional anode materials.
  • Goldene-I's 15 meV barrier implies lithium ions can move quickly enough for high-power applications.
  • Metallic character in both phases supports low internal resistance during battery operation.
  • Preservation of structure after lithium insertion indicates potential for repeated cycling without rapid degradation.
  • The two distinct motifs open routes to tuning capacity versus rate by choosing or combining the phases.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If large-area goldene films can be produced, the same computational workflow could be applied to goldene-based composites or heterostructures with other 2D materials.
  • The periodic pores in goldene-II might be adjusted in size during synthesis to control the maximum lithium loading before clustering occurs.
  • Deriving additional metal monolayers from layered precursor phases could yield a broader family of 2D anodes with similar or better metrics.

Load-bearing premise

The adsorption energies, diffusion barriers, and stability values computed for ideal defect-free monolayers will translate directly to the behavior of real goldene electrodes inside a working battery.

What would settle it

Fabrication of goldene sheets into an electrode followed by measurement of its reversible specific capacity and rate performance in a lithium half-cell over multiple charge-discharge cycles.

read the original abstract

Being motivated by recent synthesis of a monolayer of gold, named goldene, from the nano-laminated ternary ceramic phase of Ti3AuC2, we are proposing two phases of goldene viz. goldene-I and goldene-II as anode material for Lithium-Ion batteries using first principles study. This innovative goldene-I monolayer, composed of triangular motifs of gold atoms, exhibits remarkable properties owing to its unique geometric configuration and intrinsic stability. In contrast, a theoretical structure known as goldene-II, featuring a combination of triangular and hexagonal motifs, has been proposed. This structure possesses intrinsic, periodically distributed pores among Au atoms and demonstrates structural integrity and mechanical robustness, even under lithium adsorption. The electronic band spectra and projected density of states reveal the metallic nature of both phases of goldene. Electrochemical evaluations reveal that goldene-II offers favorable lithium-ion adsorption energies, efficient charge transfer, and volumetric capacities. Goldene-I achieves a volumetric capacity of 0.713 Ah/cm3, while goldene-II reaches 0.783 Ah/cm3, confirming its high suitability for lithium storage volumetric capability. Moreover, goldene-I has an ultra-low barrier height of 15 meV, which supports rapid lithium-ion transport.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes two phases of goldene (monolayer gold) as anode materials for Li-ion batteries via first-principles DFT. Goldene-I (triangular motifs) and goldene-II (triangular-hexagonal motifs with pores) are both metallic; goldene-II shows favorable Li adsorption and charge transfer, while goldene-I and goldene-II achieve volumetric capacities of 0.713 Ah/cm³ and 0.783 Ah/cm³ respectively. Goldene-I is reported to have an ultra-low Li diffusion barrier of 15 meV, supporting claims of high volumetric storage suitability and rapid ion transport.

Significance. If the DFT results prove robust, the combination of metallic conductivity, high volumetric capacity, and exceptionally low diffusion barrier would mark goldene as a potentially attractive 2D anode candidate offering advantages in rate capability over graphite. The work adds to computational explorations of post-graphene 2D materials for batteries, though its practical significance remains limited by the absence of experimental benchmarks and the well-known DFT limitations regarding electrolyte effects and cycling stability.

major comments (3)
  1. [Computational Methods] Computational Methods section: no values or convergence data are supplied for the exchange-correlation functional, plane-wave cutoff, or k-point sampling. These free parameters directly control the accuracy of the Li adsorption energies, the 15 meV barrier (presumably from NEB), and the derived volumetric capacities.
  2. [Results] Results section on electrochemical performance: the volumetric capacities (0.713 Ah/cm³ for goldene-I, 0.783 Ah/cm³ for goldene-II) are obtained by converting areal Li loading to volume, yet the effective thickness or reference volume per unit cell is neither stated nor justified. This choice is load-bearing for the central claim of 'high suitability for lithium storage volumetric capability.'
  3. [Results] Results section on diffusion: the 15 meV barrier for goldene-I is presented without error estimates from the NEB calculation, without comparison to literature values for other anodes, and without confirmation that the minimum-energy path was fully converged with respect to supercell size or image spacing.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrase 'first principles study' is used without naming the code, functional, or key numerical settings, reducing immediate assessability.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions and text: several instances of inconsistent notation for the two goldene phases (goldene-I vs. goldene-II) and missing labels on band-structure or DOS plots hinder quick cross-referencing with the capacity and barrier claims.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful and constructive review of our manuscript. We have addressed each of the major comments point by point below, and the revised manuscript will incorporate the necessary clarifications and additional data to improve rigor and reproducibility.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Computational Methods] Computational Methods section: no values or convergence data are supplied for the exchange-correlation functional, plane-wave cutoff, or k-point sampling. These free parameters directly control the accuracy of the Li adsorption energies, the 15 meV barrier (presumably from NEB), and the derived volumetric capacities.

    Authors: We agree that the Computational Methods section is incomplete and that explicit parameters and convergence information are required for reproducibility. This was an oversight in the original submission. In the revised manuscript we will add a detailed description of the exchange-correlation functional, plane-wave cutoff, k-point sampling, and convergence tests performed for energies, forces, and the NEB barrier. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] Results section on electrochemical performance: the volumetric capacities (0.713 Ah/cm³ for goldene-I, 0.783 Ah/cm³ for goldene-II) are obtained by converting areal Li loading to volume, yet the effective thickness or reference volume per unit cell is neither stated nor justified. This choice is load-bearing for the central claim of 'high suitability for lithium storage volumetric capability.'

    Authors: The referee is correct that the conversion from areal to volumetric capacity requires explicit justification of the reference volume. In the revised manuscript we will state the effective thickness used (derived from the optimized monolayer geometry and slab model), provide the exact formula and unit-cell volume employed, and justify the choice by reference to the atomic-layer spacing in the structure. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Results] Results section on diffusion: the 15 meV barrier for goldene-I is presented without error estimates from the NEB calculation, without comparison to literature values for other anodes, and without confirmation that the minimum-energy path was fully converged with respect to supercell size or image spacing.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the diffusion-barrier section lacks these supporting details. In the revision we will report error estimates from the NEB calculations, add direct comparisons to literature diffusion barriers for graphite and other 2D anode materials, and include convergence tests with respect to supercell size and number of images along the minimum-energy path. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper performs standard first-principles DFT calculations on proposed goldene-I and goldene-II structures to obtain metallic band structures, Li adsorption energies, NEB diffusion barriers (e.g., 15 meV), and volumetric capacities (0.713 and 0.783 Ah/cm³) directly from supercell loadings and geometric conversions. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to its own inputs, fitted parameters, or self-citation chains; external motivation from recent synthesis is cited only as background and does not enter the computational results. The derivation remains self-contained against routine DFT benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The study relies on standard density functional theory approximations whose accuracy for adsorption and diffusion in 2D metals is known to vary with functional choice and other settings.

free parameters (2)
  • Exchange-correlation functional
    Choice of functional (commonly PBE or similar) directly affects adsorption energies and diffusion barriers reported in the abstract.
  • k-point sampling and energy cutoff
    These numerical parameters control convergence of electronic and structural properties but are unspecified in the abstract.
axioms (1)
  • standard math Born-Oppenheimer approximation and periodic boundary conditions
    Standard assumptions in plane-wave DFT calculations for 2D materials.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5530 in / 1346 out tokens · 44836 ms · 2026-05-10T15:41:16.070414+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

108 extracted references · 108 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Hassoun, and Y.-K

    Scrosati, B., J. Hassoun, and Y.-K. Sun, Lithium-ion batteries. A look into the future. Energy & Environmental Science, 2011. 4(9): p. 3287-3295

    work page 2011

  2. [2]

    Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry, 2011

    Scrosati, B., History of lithium batteries. Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry, 2011. 15(7): p. 1623-1630

    work page 2011

  3. [3]

    Armand, M. and J.M. Tarascon, Building better batteries. Nature, 2008. 451(7179): p. 652-657

    work page 2008

  4. [4]

    Kumar, and P

    Senapati, P., A. Kumar, and P. Parida, Enhanced thermopower in two-dimensional ruthenium dichalcogenides RuX2 (X = S, Se): a first-principles study. Physica Scripta, 2025. 100(6): p. 065923

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    Applied Physics Letters, 2024

    Kumar, S., et al., Engineering a two-dimensional kagome topological insulator from porous graphene. Applied Physics Letters, 2024. 125(25)

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Kumar, and P

    Senapati, P., A. Kumar, and P. Parida, Thermoelectric properties of C2P4 monolayer: A first principle study. Journal of Applied Physics, 2023. 133(1)

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Senapati, P. and P. Parida, Thermoelectric performance of quantum dots embedded in an Aharonov- Bohm ring: a Pauli master equation approach. Scientific Reports, 2025. 15(1): p. 13232

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    Senapati, and P

    Kumar, A., P. Senapati, and P. Parida, Theoretical insights into the structural, electronic and thermoelectric properties of the inorganic biphenylene monolayer. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2024. 26(3): p. 2044-2057

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 2025

    Gupta, N., et al., Electronic, optical and thermoelectric behavior of KCuX (X = S, Se, Te) monolayers. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 2025. 37(4): p. 045501

    work page 2025

  10. [10]

    Kumari, and S.J

    Sahoo, S., P. Kumari, and S.J. Ray, Exploring pristine and transition metal doped SiP2 monolayer as a promising anode material for metal (Li, Na, Mg) ion battery. Materials Advances, 2024. 5(7): p. 2797-2804

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2024

    Sahoo, S., et al., Electronic Properties of Twisted hBN/NbSe2 Hetero-structure and Its Application as an Electrode in Lithium-Ion Battery: First-Principle Study. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2024. 128(5): p. 1877-1885

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    Marcicki, and W.A

    Masias, A., J. Marcicki, and W.A. Paxton, Opportunities and Challenges of Lithium Ion Batteries in Automotive Applications. ACS Energy Letters, 2021. 6(2): p. 621-630

    work page 2021

  13. [13]

    Megahed, S. and W. Ebner, Lithium-ion battery for electronic applications. Journal of Power Sources, 1995. 54(1): p. 155-162

    work page 1995

  14. [14]

    Opitz, A., et al., Can Li-Ion batteries be the panacea for automotive applications? Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017. 68: p. 685-692

    work page 2017

  15. [15]

    Kumar, and P

    Samanta, P., A. Kumar, and P. Parida, Two‐Dimensional Antiferromagnetic Fe2As2 as an Anode Material for Rechargeable Li‐Ion Batteries: A DFT Study. Advanced Theory and Simulations, 2025. 26

    work page 2025

  16. [16]

    Sustainable Energy & Fuels, 2020

    Asenbauer, J., et al., The success story of graphite as a lithium-ion anode material – fundamentals, remaining challenges, and recent developments including silicon (oxide) composites. Sustainable Energy & Fuels, 2020. 4(11): p. 5387-5416

    work page 2020

  17. [17]

    Journal of applied physics, 1995

    Wilson, A., et al., Nanodispersed silicon in pregraphitic carbons. Journal of applied physics, 1995. 77(6): p. 2363-2369

    work page 1995

  18. [18]

    Journal of Energy Storage, 2024

    Liu, H., et al., Sn-based anode materials for lithium-ion batteries: From mechanism to modification. Journal of Energy Storage, 2024. 80: p. 109862

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    Electrochimica Acta, 2009

    Yu, Y., et al., Three-dimensional porous amorphous SnO2 thin films as anodes for Li-ion batteries. Electrochimica Acta, 2009. 54(28): p. 7227-7230

    work page 2009

  20. [20]

    Kugino, and M

    Dimov, N., S. Kugino, and M. Yoshio, Carbon-coated silicon as anode material for lithium ion batteries: advantages and limitations. Electrochimica Acta, 2003. 48(11): p. 1579-1587

    work page 2003

  21. [21]

    Carbon, 2022

    Yang, Z., et al., Realizing ultra-stable SnO2 anodes via in-situ formed confined space for volume expansion. Carbon, 2022. 187: p. 321-329

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    Geim, A.K. and K.S. Novoselov, The rise of graphene. Nature materials, 2007. 6(3): p. 183-191

    work page 2007

  23. [23]

    Reviews of modern physics, 2009

    Castro Neto, A.H., et al., The electronic properties of graphene. Reviews of modern physics, 2009. 81(1): p. 109-162

    work page 2009

  24. [24]

    Nature chemistry, 2016

    Feng, B., et al., Experimental realization of two-dimensional boron sheets. Nature chemistry, 2016. 8(6): p. 563-568

    work page 2016

  25. [25]

    ACS nano,

    Liu, H., et al., Phosphorene: an unexplored 2D semiconductor with a high hole mobility. ACS nano,

    work page

  26. [26]

    Advanced Materials, 2019

    Lin, H., et al., Silicene: wet‐chemical exfoliation synthesis and biodegradable tumor nanomedicine. Advanced Materials, 2019. 31(37): p. 1903013

    work page 2019

  27. [27]

    Scientific Reports, 2017

    Shih, P.-H., et al., Coulomb excitations of monolayer germanene. Scientific Reports, 2017. 7(1): p. 40600

    work page 2017

  28. [28]

    Nature materials, 2015

    Zhu, F.-f., et al., Epitaxial growth of two-dimensional stanene. Nature materials, 2015. 14(10): p. 1020-1025

    work page 2015

  29. [29]

    Nature Materials, 2017

    Fashandi, H., et al., Synthesis of Ti3AuC2, Ti3Au2C2 and Ti3IrC2 by noble metal substitution reaction in Ti3SiC2 for high-temperature-stable Ohmic contacts to SiC. Nature Materials, 2017. 16(8): p. 814- 818

    work page 2017

  30. [30]

    Nature Synthesis,

    Kashiwaya, S., et al., Synthesis of goldene comprising single-atom layer gold. Nature Synthesis,

    work page

  31. [31]

    Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2015

    Yang, L.-M., et al., Glitter in a 2D monolayer. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2015. 17(39): p. 26036-26042

    work page 2015

  32. [32]

    Science, 2015

    Mannix, A.J., et al., Synthesis of borophenes: Anisotropic, two-dimensional boron polymorphs. Science, 2015. 350(6267): p. 1513-1516

    work page 2015

  33. [33]

    Nature Nanotechnology, 2018

    Mannix, A.J., et al., Borophene as a prototype for synthetic 2D materials development. Nature Nanotechnology, 2018. 13(6): p. 444-450

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    Advanced Materials, 2019

    Ranjan, P., et al., Freestanding Borophene and Its Hybrids. Advanced Materials, 2019. 31(27): p. 1900353

    work page 2019

  35. [35]

    Tang, H. and S. Ismail-Beigi, First-principles study of boron sheets and nanotubes. Physical Review B,

    work page

  36. [36]

    Tang, H. and S. Ismail-Beigi, Novel Precursors for Boron Nanotubes: The Competition of Two-Center and Three-Center Bonding in Boron Sheets. Physical Review Letters, 2007. 99(11): p. 115501

    work page 2007

  37. [37]

    Kumar, A. and P. Parida, Theoretical study of δ-5 boron monolayer as an anode material for Li- and non-Li-ion batteries. Journal of Materials Research, 2022. 37(20): p. 3384-3393

    work page 2022

  38. [38]

    Journal of computational chemistry, 2008

    Hafner, J., Ab‐initio simulations of materials using VASP: Density‐functional theory and beyond. Journal of computational chemistry, 2008. 29(13): p. 2044-2078

    work page 2008

  39. [39]

    Burke, and Y

    Perdew, J.P., K. Burke, and Y. Wang, Generalized gradient approximation for the exchange- correlation hole of a many-electron system. Physical Review B, 1996. 54(23): p. 16533-16539

    work page 1996

  40. [40]

    Fluckey, S. and W. Vandenberghe, Diamond two-phonon infrared absorption spectrum calculated from first principles using the finite displacement method. Applied Physics Letters, 2024. 124

    work page 2024

  41. [41]

    Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 2023

    Togo, A., et al., Implementation strategies in phonopy and phono3py. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 2023. 35(35): p. 353001

    work page 2023

  42. [42]

    Burke, and M

    Perdew, J.P., K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Physical Review Letters, 1996. 77(18): p. 3865-3868. 27

    work page 1996

  43. [43]

    Scientific Data,

    Naik, A.A., et al., A Quantum-Chemical Bonding Database for Solid-State Materials. Scientific Data,

    work page

  44. [44]

    Physical Review Materials, 2022

    Singh, D., et al., Stability of and conduction in single-walled ${\mathrm{Si}}_{2}\mathrm{BN}$ nanotubes. Physical Review Materials, 2022. 6(11): p. 116001

    work page 2022

  45. [45]

    Non-covalent interactions in quantum chemistry and physics, 2017: p

    Goerigk, L., A comprehensive overview of the DFT-D3 London-dispersion correction. Non-covalent interactions in quantum chemistry and physics, 2017: p. 195-219

    work page 2017

  46. [46]

    Uberuaga, and H

    Henkelman, G., B.P. Uberuaga, and H. Jónsson, A climbing image nudged elastic band method for finding saddle points and minimum energy paths. The Journal of chemical physics, 2000. 113(22): p. 9901-9904

    work page 2000

  47. [47]

    npj Computational Materials, 2018

    He, X., et al., Statistical variances of diffusional properties from ab initio molecular dynamics simulations. npj Computational Materials, 2018. 4(1): p. 18

    work page 2018

  48. [48]

    Nature Communications, 2020

    Han, S., et al., Gas-assisted transformation of gold from fcc to the metastable 4H phase. Nature Communications, 2020. 11(1): p. 552

    work page 2020

  49. [49]

    Energy & Environmental Science, 2018

    Muy, S., et al., Tuning mobility and stability of lithium ion conductors based on lattice dynamics. Energy & Environmental Science, 2018. 11(4): p. 850-859

    work page 2018

  50. [50]

    MXene as Promising Anode Material for High-Performance Lithium-Ion Batteries: A Comprehensive Review

    Chy, M.N., et al. MXene as Promising Anode Material for High-Performance Lithium-Ion Batteries: A Comprehensive Review. Nanomaterials, 2024. 14, 616 DOI: 10.3390/nano14070616

    work page doi:10.3390/nano14070616 2024

  51. [51]

    Barron, T.H.K. and M.L. Klein, Second-order elastic constants of a solid under stress. Proceedings of the Physical Society, 1965. 85(3): p. 523

    work page 1965

  52. [52]

    Senapati, and P

    Kumar, A., P. Senapati, and P. Parida, Unravelling the potential of a hybrid borocarbonitride biphenylene 2D network for thermoelectric applications: a first principles study. Nanoscale, 2025. 17(7): p. 4015-4029

    work page 2025

  53. [53]

    Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 2019

    Kim, J.H., et al., Mechanical properties of two-dimensional materials and their applications. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 2019. 52(8): p. 083001

    work page 2019

  54. [54]

    ACS Nano, 2019

    Vinogradov, N.A., et al., Single-Phase Borophene on Ir(111): Formation, Structure, and Decoupling from the Support. ACS Nano, 2019. 13(12): p. 14511-14518

    work page 2019

  55. [55]

    Nanoscale, 2024

    Sun, Y., et al., Hexagonal Mg2B2 and Ca2B2 monolayers as promising anode materials for Li-ion and Na-ion batteries. Nanoscale, 2024. 16(33): p. 15699-15712

    work page 2024

  56. [56]

    Physical Review Letters, 2010

    Hernández, E.R., et al., First-Principles Simulations of Lithium Melting: Stability of the bcc Phase Close to Melting. Physical Review Letters, 2010. 104(18): p. 185701

    work page 2010

  57. [57]

    Applied Surface Science, 2018

    Su, J., et al., A first-principles study of 2D antimonene electrodes for Li ion storage. Applied Surface Science, 2018. 462: p. 270-275

    work page 2018

  58. [58]

    Physical Review Applied, 2021

    Abdullahi, Y.Z., et al., Theoretical Screening of Metal Borocarbide Sheets for High-Capacity and High-Rate $\mathrm{Li}$- and $\mathrm{Na}$-Ion Batteries. Physical Review Applied, 2021. 16(2): p. 024031

    work page 2021

  59. [59]

    The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2018

    Shang, C., et al., Theoretical prediction of Janus MoSSe as a potential anode material for lithium-ion batteries. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2018. 122(42): p. 23899-23909

    work page 2018

  60. [60]

    Martins, J.A.S

    N.F. Martins, J.A.S. Artigas Dos Santos Laranjeira, B.D. Aparicio-Huacarpuma, K.A. Lopes Lima, L.A. Ribeiro, Jr., J.R. Sambrano, Goldene monolayer as a highly effective catalyst for polysulfide anchoring and conversion, J. Mater. Chem. A (2026) 10.1039.D6TA00772D. https://doi.org/10.1039/D6TA00772D

    work page doi:10.1039/d6ta00772d 2026

  61. [61]

    Patel, S

    P. Patel, S. Patel, D. Chodvadiya, M.H. Dalsaniya, D. Kurzydłowski, P.K. Jha, Two-Dimensional α-SiX (X = N, P) Monolayers as Efficient Anode Material for Li-Ion Batteries: A First-Principles Study, ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 6 (2023) 2103–2115. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.2c05090

    work page doi:10.1021/acsanm.2c05090 2023

  62. [62]

    PRX Energy, 2023

    Wang, F., et al., ${\mathrm{Be}}_{2}{\mathrm{C}}_{5}$ Monolayer with Quasiplanar Pentacoordinate Carbon Atoms and Ultrahigh Energy Density as a Dirac Anode for Potassium-Ion Batteries. PRX Energy, 2023. 2(3): p. 033012

    work page 2023

  63. [63]

    npj Computational Materials, 2020

    Bartel, C.J., et al., A critical examination of compound stability predictions from machine-learned formation energies. npj Computational Materials, 2020. 6(1): p. 97

    work page 2020

  64. [64]

    Joule, 2018

    Nolan, A.M., et al., Computation-Accelerated Design of Materials and Interfaces for All-Solid-State Lithium-Ion Batteries. Joule, 2018. 2(10): p. 2016-2046

    work page 2018

  65. [65]

    Journal of Energy Storage, 2026

    Zheng, K., et al., Novel hybrid honeycomb silicene as anode material for potassium-ion batteries. Journal of Energy Storage, 2026. 151: p. 120443. 28

    work page 2026

  66. [66]

    Haruyama, S

    J. Haruyama, S. Takagi, K. Shimoda, I. Watanabe, K. Sodeyama, T. Ikeshoji, M. Otani, Thermodynamic Analysis of Li-Intercalated Graphite by First-Principles Calculations with Vibrational and Configurational Contributions, J. Phys. Chem. C 125 (2021) 27891–27900. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c08992

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c08992 2021

  67. [67]

    Pande, V

    V. Pande, V. Viswanathan, Robust high-fidelity DFT study of the lithium-graphite phase diagram, Phys. Rev. Materials 2 (2018) 125401. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.125401

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevmaterials.2.125401 2018

  68. [68]

    Persson, Y

    K. Persson, Y. Hinuma, Y.S. Meng, A. Van Der Ven, G. Ceder, Thermodynamic and kinetic properties of the Li - graphite system from first-principles calculations, Phys. Rev. B 82 (2010) 125416. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.82.125416

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.82.125416 2010

  69. [69]

    Nature Communications, 2020

    Mo, R., et al., Tin-graphene tubes as anodes for lithium-ion batteries with high volumetric and gravimetric energy densities. Nature Communications, 2020. 11(1): p. 1374

    work page 2020

  70. [70]

    Nano Energy, 2016

    Jiang, H.R., et al., Borophene: A promising anode material offering high specific capacity and high rate capability for lithium-ion batteries. Nano Energy, 2016. 23: p. 97-104

    work page 2016

  71. [71]

    Nanoscale, 2016

    Zhang, X., et al., Borophene as an extremely high capacity electrode material for Li-ion and Na-ion batteries. Nanoscale, 2016. 8(33): p. 15340-15347

    work page 2016

  72. [72]

    Ayodhya, D. and G. Veerabhadram, A brief review on synthesis, properties and lithium-ion battery applications of borophene. FlatChem, 2020. 19: p. 100150

    work page 2020

  73. [73]

    Advanced Energy Materials, 2018

    Pang, J., et al., Applications of Phosphorene and Black Phosphorus in Energy Conversion and Storage Devices. Advanced Energy Materials, 2018. 8(8): p. 1702093

    work page 2018

  74. [74]

    Physical Review Letters, 2009

    Cahangirov, S., et al., Two- and One-Dimensional Honeycomb Structures of Silicon and Germanium. Physical Review Letters, 2009. 102(23): p. 236804

    work page 2009

  75. [75]

    ACS Nano,

    Serino, A.C., et al., Lithium-Ion Insertion Properties of Solution-Exfoliated Germanane. ACS Nano,

    work page

  76. [76]

    Obeid, M.M. and Q. Sun, Assembling biphenylene into 3D porous metallic carbon allotrope for promising anode of lithium-ion batteries. Carbon, 2022. 188: p. 95-103

    work page 2022

  77. [77]

    Y. Deng, L. Ding, Q. Liu, L. Zhan, Y. Wang, S. Yang, Two-dimensional MoS2-graphene hybrid nanosheets for high gravimetric and volumetric lithium storage, Applied Surface Science 437 (2018) 384–

    work page 2018

  78. [78]

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.12.020

    work page doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.12.020 2017

  79. [79]

    Advanced Materials, 2014

    Naguib, M., et al., 25th Anniversary Article: MXenes: A New Family of Two-Dimensional Materials. Advanced Materials, 2014. 26(7): p. 992-1005

    work page 2014

  80. [80]

    Nanoscale Horizons, 2020

    Hess, P., Thickness of elemental and binary single atomic monolayers. Nanoscale Horizons, 2020. 5(3): p. 385-399

    work page 2020

Showing first 80 references.