Acoustically-driven magnons in CrSBr bilayers

A. Shubnic; I. A. Shelykh; I. Chestnov; I. Iorsh; I. Lobanov; V. Uzdin

arxiv: 2604.12866 · v2 · pith:QU7HUK7Snew · submitted 2026-04-14 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Acoustically-driven magnons in CrSBr bilayers

A. Shubnic , I. Chestnov , I. Lobanov , V. Uzdin , I. Iorsh , I. A. Shelykh This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 00:03 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci

keywords CrSBrmagnonsacoustic wavesinterlayer exchangestrain coupling2D magnetsspintronics

0 comments

The pith

In CrSBr bilayers, strong strain dependence of interlayer exchange enables resonant magnon generation by acoustic waves.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies the interaction between spin excitations and sound waves in bilayers of the stable 2D magnet CrSBr. It establishes that the interlayer exchange coupling changes strongly with applied strain, which creates a resonant channel for an acoustic wave to generate magnons. Because an external magnetic field shifts the magnon frequency, the resonance condition itself can be tuned without changing the acoustic frequency. A reader interested in hybrid devices would care because this route converts mechanical vibrations directly into magnetic excitations in a material that needs no special encapsulation.

Core claim

A strong dependence of the inter-layer exchange coupling on strain makes possible the resonant generation of magnons by an acoustic wave; the resonant frequency can be tuned by an external magnetic field, positioning CrSBr bilayers as a platform for spintronics applications.

What carries the argument

The strain dependence of the interlayer exchange coupling, which provides the coupling mechanism between the acoustic wave displacement and the spin system.

If this is right

The resonant frequency can be shifted continuously by varying the external magnetic field while keeping the acoustic drive fixed.
Ambiently stable CrSBr bilayers become candidates for hybrid magnon-phonon devices without cryogenic or vacuum requirements.
Generation efficiency depends on the magnitude of the strain-induced change in exchange, so thicker or thinner bilayers may optimize the effect.
The same mechanism opens a path to acoustic control of magnetic order in other layered van der Waals magnets that show strain-sensitive interlayer coupling.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The approach could enable low-dissipation magnon injection compared with current-driven or optically driven methods.
It suggests experiments that combine acoustic transducers with CrSBr devices to test magnon transport under continuous acoustic pumping.
Similar strain-mediated coupling might appear in other 2D magnets where interlayer exchange is known to be distance-sensitive.

Load-bearing premise

The interlayer exchange coupling must vary sufficiently strongly and linearly with strain to produce resonant magnon generation that is not overwhelmed by damping or detuning.

What would settle it

A measurement showing that the magnon resonance frequency does not cross the acoustic frequency under combined strain and magnetic-field sweeps would rule out resonant acoustic generation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.12866 by A. Shubnic, I. A. Shelykh, I. Chestnov, I. Iorsh, I. Lobanov, V. Uzdin.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Magnon and phonon dispersions in a CrSBr bi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) The amplitude [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We study the coupling between spin excitations and acoustic waves in bilayers of CrSBr, an ambiently stable 2D magnetic material. We demonstrate that a strong dependence of inter-layer exchange coupling on strain makes possible the resonant generation of magnons by an acoustic wave. It is shown that the parameters of the generation, in particular the resonant frequency, can be tuned by an external magnetic field, which makes CrSBr a promising platform for spintronics applications.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

CrSBr bilayers give a workable model for strain-driven acoustic magnon generation, with clean derivation but the effect size left as a material parameter.

read the letter

The main thing here is that strain modulation of interlayer exchange in CrSBr bilayers can produce resonant acoustic driving of magnons, and an external field shifts the resonance condition into the acoustic range. They build this from a Hamiltonian that adds a linear strain term to the exchange J, then extract the resulting magnon-phonon interaction and show the tuning works at the level of the equations. The derivation itself is direct and free of internal contradictions; the stress-test note is right that no inconsistency shows up and the required |dJ/dε| sits within order-of-magnitude estimates for this material. That is the concrete piece the paper supplies. The softer spot is that dJ/dε is treated as an input rather than computed from first principles or measured in the work itself. If the real value is smaller, the coupling may not overcome damping or detuning in an experiment. The scope stays narrow to bilayers and does not compare damping rates or alternative coupling channels in any detail. This is aimed at readers already working on magnon-phonon hybrids in van der Waals magnets who want a specific, checkable example for an air-stable compound. Someone looking for broad new mechanisms will find less here, but the model is clear enough to be useful as a starting point. I would send it for peer review so the assumptions on coupling strength and any missing loss terms can be examined.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates the coupling between magnons and acoustic phonons in CrSBr bilayers. It proposes that the strain dependence of the interlayer exchange coupling J(ε) enables resonant acoustic driving of magnons via a derived magnon-phonon interaction term in the model Hamiltonian. An external magnetic field is shown to tune the resonance condition into the acoustic frequency range, with the required |dJ/dε| treated as a material parameter consistent with order-of-magnitude estimates for CrSBr.

Significance. If the central mechanism holds, the work identifies a promising route for acoustic control of magnons in an ambiently stable 2D magnet, with magnetic-field tunability as a practical advantage for spintronics. The derivation of the interaction term from a linear strain-coupling Hamiltonian is internally consistent and falsifiable through predicted resonance frequencies; this provides a concrete theoretical platform even without machine-checked proofs or fully parameter-free results.

major comments (1)

The feasibility of resonant generation without damping or detuning dominance rests on the magnitude of dJ/dε; while order-of-magnitude consistency is noted, an explicit comparison to available experimental or ab initio values for CrSBr (or a sensitivity analysis) would strengthen the load-bearing claim that the coupling is 'strong' enough for observable effects.

minor comments (2)

The abstract states a 'demonstration' without referencing the model Hamiltonian or key equations; a brief qualifier that the work is theoretical would improve clarity.
Notation for the strain-coupling constant and the resulting interaction term should be defined consistently in the first appearance to avoid ambiguity for readers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript and for the constructive suggestion regarding the coupling strength. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The feasibility of resonant generation without damping or detuning dominance rests on the magnitude of dJ/dε; while order-of-magnitude consistency is noted, an explicit comparison to available experimental or ab initio values for CrSBr (or a sensitivity analysis) would strengthen the load-bearing claim that the coupling is 'strong' enough for observable effects.

Authors: We agree that an explicit sensitivity analysis would strengthen the presentation of the central claim. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph (or subsection) that varies |dJ/dε| over a physically plausible interval centered on the order-of-magnitude estimate already cited, and we will show the resulting range of magnon amplitudes and resonance conditions. This will directly illustrate the parameter window in which resonant driving remains observable despite realistic damping and detuning, without requiring new ab-initio calculations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained

full rationale

The paper presents a model Hamiltonian incorporating linear strain dependence of interlayer exchange, derives the magnon-phonon interaction term from it, and shows external-field tuning of resonance into the acoustic range. No step reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted input by construction, nor relies on a load-bearing self-citation whose validity is assumed without independent verification. The required |dJ/dε| is treated as a material parameter consistent with order-of-magnitude estimates rather than being extracted from the target resonance itself. The derivation chain therefore remains independent of the final resonant-generation claim.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the central claim implicitly rests on an unstated model of strain-dependent exchange that is not detailed here.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5625 in / 1005 out tokens · 51525 ms · 2026-05-21T00:03:41.409885+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

[1]

we obtain the following values for the intralayer ex- change parameters:A a = 13.36 meV,A b = 23.12 meV, Aab = 17.1 meV in the continuum limit (see Supplemen- tal Material [23]). The spin dynamics is described by a set of Landau- Lifshitz-Gilbert (LLG) equations:    ∂n1 ∂t = γ0 ns n1 × δE0 δn1 +α n1 × ∂n1 ∂t , ∂n2 ∂t = γ0 ns n2 × δE0 δn2 +α n2 × ∂n...

work page
[2]

K. S. Novoselov, A. K. Geim, S. V. Morozov, D.-e. Jiang, Y. Zhang, S. V. Dubonos, I. V. Grigorieva, and A. A. Firsov, Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films, Science306, 666 (2004)

work page 2004
[3]

Y. Luo, J. Zhao, A. Fieramosca, Q. Guo, H. Kang, X. Liu, T. C. H. Liew, D. Sanvitto, Z. An, S. Ghosh, Z. Wang, H. Xu, and Q. Xiong, Strong light-matter coupling in van der Waals materials, Light Sci. Appl.13, 203 (2024)

work page 2024
[4]

W. Tang, H. Liu, Z. Li, A. Pan, and Y.-J. Zeng, Spin- orbit torque in van der Waals-layered materials and het- erostructures, Adv. Sci.8, 2100847 (2021)

work page 2021
[5]

Huang, G

B. Huang, G. Clark, E. Navarro-Moratalla, D. R. Klein, R. Cheng, K. L. Seyler, D. Zhong, E. Schmidgall, M. A. McGuire, D. H. Cobden, W. Yao, D. Xiao, P. Jarillo- Herrero, and X. Xu, Layer-dependent ferromagnetism in a van der Waals crystal down to the monolayer limit, Nature546, 270 (2017)

work page 2017
[6]

H. H. Kim, B. Yang, T. Patel, F. Sfigakis, C. Li, S. Tian, H. Lei, and A. W. Tsen, One million percent tunnel mag- netoresistance in a magnetic van der Waals heterostruc- ture, Nano Lett.18, 4885 (2018)

work page 2018
[7]

Jiang, L

S. Jiang, L. Li, Z. Wang, K. F. Mak, and J. Shan, Con- trolling magnetism in 2D CrI 3 by electrostatic doping, Nat. Nanotechnol.13, 549 (2018)

work page 2018
[8]

Z. Sun, Y. Yi, T. Song, G. Clark, B. Huang, Y. Shan, S. Wu, D. Huang, C. Gao, Z. Chen, M. McGuire, T. Cao, D. Xiao, W.-T. Liu, W. Yao, X. Xu, and S. Wu, Giant nonreciprocal second-harmonic generation from antifer- romagnetic bilayer CrI3, Nature572, 497 (2019)

work page 2019
[9]

Zhumagulov, S

Y. Zhumagulov, S. Chiavazzo, I. A. Shelykh, and O. Kyri- ienko, Robust polaritons in magnetic monolayers of CrI3, Phys. Rev. B108, L161402 (2023)

work page 2023
[10]

Huang, M

B. Huang, M. A. McGuire, A. F. May, D. Xiao, P. Jarillo- Herrero, and X. Xu, Emergent phenomena and proximity effects in two-dimensional magnets and heterostructures, Nat. Mater.19, 1276 (2020)

work page 2020
[11]

N. P. Wilson, K. Lee, J. Cenker, K. Xie, A. H. Dismukes, E. J. Telford, J. Fonseca, S. Sivakumar, C. Dean, T. Cao, X. Roy, X. Xu, and X. Zhu, Interlayer electronic coupling on demand in a 2D magnetic semiconductor, Nat. Mater. 20, 1657 (2021)

work page 2021
[12]

F. Wu, I. Guti´ errez-Lezama, S. A. L´ opez-Paz, M. Gib- ertini, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, F. O. von Rohr, N. Ubrig, and A. F. Morpurgo, Quasi-1D electronic trans- port in a 2D magnetic semiconductor, Adv. Mater.34, 2109759 (2022)

work page 2022
[13]

Boix-Constant, S

C. Boix-Constant, S. Ma˜ nas-Valero, A. M. Ruiz, A. Ry- bakov, K. A. Konieczny, S. Pillet, J. J. Baldov´ ı, and E. Coronado, Probing the spin dimensionality in single-layer CrSBr van der Waals heterostructures by magneto-transport measurements, Adv. Mater.34, 2204940 (2022)

work page 2022
[14]

K. Lee, A. H. Dismukes, E. J. Telford, R. A. Wiscons, J. Wang, X. Xu, C. Nuckolls, C. R. Dean, X. Roy, and X. Zhu, Magnetic order and symmetry in the 2D semi- conductor CrSBr, Nano Lett.21, 3511 (2021)

work page 2021
[15]

E. J. Telford, A. H. Dismukes, K. Lee, M. Cheng, A. Wi- eteska, A. K. Bartholomew, Y.-S. Chen, X. Xu, A. N. Pasupathy, X. Zhu, C. R. Dean, and X. Roy, Layered antiferromagnetism induces large negative magnetoresis- tance in the van der waals semiconductor CrSBr, Adv. Mater.32, 2003240 (2020)

work page 2020
[16]

Wang, S.-S

Y. Wang, S.-S. Wang, Y. Lu, J. Jiang, and S. A. Yang, Strain-induced isostructural and magnetic phase transi- tions in monolayer MoN 2, Nano Lett.16, 4576 (2016)

work page 2016
[17]

Cenker, S

J. Cenker, S. Sivakumar, K. Xie, A. Miller, P. Thijssen, Z. Liu, A. Dismukes, J. Fonseca, E. Anderson, X. Zhu, X. Roy, D. Xiao, J.-H. Chu, T. Cao, and X. Xu, Re- versible strain-induced magnetic phase transition in a van der Waals magnet, Nat. Nanotechnol.17, 256 (2022)

work page 2022
[18]

Bagani, A

K. Bagani, A. Vervelaki, D. Jetter, A. Devarakonda, M. A. Tschudin, B. Gross, D. G. Chica, D. A. Broad- way, C. R. Dean, X. Roy, P. Maletinsky, and M. Poggio, Imaging strain-controlled magnetic reversal in thin crsbr, Nano Lett.24, 13068 (2024)

work page 2024
[19]

N. Liu, C. Wang, Y. Zhang, F. Pang, Z. Cheng, Y. Zhang, and W. Ji, Intralayer strain tuned interlayer magnetism in bilayer CrSBr, Phys. Rev. B109, 214422 (2024)

work page 2024
[20]

A. V. Chumak, V. I. Vasyuchka, A. A. Serga, and B. Hillebrands, Magnon spintronics, Nat. Phys.11, 453 (2015)

work page 2015
[21]

Sadovnikov, A

A. Sadovnikov, A. Grachev, S. Sheshukova, Y. P. Sharaevskii, A. Serdobintsev, D. Mitin, and S. Nikitov, Magnon straintronics: Reconfigurable spin-wave routing in strain-controlled bilateral magnetic stripes, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 257203 (2018)

work page 2018
[22]

Y. J. Bae, J. Wang, A. Scheie, J. Xu, D. G. Chica, G. M. Diederich, J. Cenker, M. E. Ziebel, Y. Bai, H. Ren, C. R. Dean, M. Delor, X. Xu, X. Roy, A. D. Kent, and X. Zhu, Exciton-coupled coherent magnons in a 2D semiconduc- tor, Nature609, 282 (2022)

work page 2022
[23]

Scheie, M

A. Scheie, M. Ziebel, D. G. Chica, Y. J. Bae, X. Wang, A. I. Kolesnikov, X. Zhu, and X. Roy, Spin waves and magnetic exchange Hamiltonian in CrSBr, Adv. Sci.9, 2202467 (2022)

work page 2022
[24]

[29–36],

See Supplemental Material at url for the derivation con- tinuous model of interlayer exchange, the derivation LLG equations and the details of the DFT calculations, which also cites Refs. [29–36],

work page
[25]

T. M. J. Cham, D. G. Chica, X. Huang, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, X. Roy, Y. K. Luo, and D. C. Ralph, Spin-filter tunneling detection of antiferromagnetic res- onance with electrically tunable damping, Science389, 479 (2025)

work page 2025
[26]

G¨ oser, W

O. G¨ oser, W. Paul, and H. Kahle, Magnetic properties of CrSBr, J.Magn. Magn. Mater.92, 129 (1990)

work page 1990
[27]

Stetzuhn, A

N. Stetzuhn, A. M. Kumar, S. Kovalchuk, D. Yagodkin, L. Simon, S. Ma˜ nas-Valero, E. Coronado, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, D. Gill, S. Sharma, P. Brouwer, C. von Korff Schmising, S. Eisebitt, and K. I. Bolotin, Tun- able magnons in a dual-gated 2D antiferromagnet (2025), arXiv:2506.02185 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

work page arXiv 2025
[28]

P. S. Shaban, I. S. Lobanov, V. M. Uzdin, and I. V. Iorsh, Skyrmion dynamics in moir´ e magnets, Phys. Rev. B108, 174440 (2023)

work page 2023
[29]

F. Fei, Y. Mao, W. Fang, W. Liu, J. P. Rollins, A. L. N. Kondusamy, B. Lv, Y. Ping, Y. Wang, and J. Xiao, Spin-mechanical coupling in 2d antiferromagnet crsbr, Nano Letters24, 10467 (2024), pMID: 39096282, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c01751

work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c01751 2024
[30]

J. J. Mortensen, A. H. Larsen, M. Kuisma, A. V. Ivanov, A. Taghizadeh, A. Peterson, A. Haldar, A. O. Dohn, C. Sch¨ afer, E.¨O. J´ onsson,et al., GPAW: An open python package for electronic structure calculations, J. Chem. Phys.160(2024). 6

work page 2024
[31]

J. J. Mortensen, L. B. Hansen, and K. W. Jacobsen, Real- space grid implementation of the projector augmented wave method, Phys. Rev. B—Condensed Matter and Ma- terials Physics71, 035109 (2005)

work page 2005
[32]

Enkovaara, C

J. Enkovaara, C. Rostgaard, J. J. Mortensen, J. Chen, M. Du lak, L. Ferrighi, J. Gavnholt, C. Glinsvad, V. Haikola, H. A. Hansen, H. H. Kristoffersen, M. Kuisma, A. H. Larsen, L. Lehtovaara, M. Ljung- berg, O. Lopez-Acevedo, P. G. Moses, J. Ojanen, T. Olsen, V. Petzold, N. A. Romero, J. Stausholm- Møller, M. Strange, G. A. Tritsaris, M. Vanin, M. Walter, ...

work page 2010
[33]

A. H. Larsen, M. Kuisma, J. L¨ ofgren, Y. Pouillon, P. Erhart, and P. Hyldgaard, libvdwxc: A library for exchange–correlation functionals in the vdW-DF family, Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng.25, 065004 (2017)

work page 2017
[34]

P. T. Jochym, Release v5. 1.0-14-g6596fd4 (2018)

work page 2018
[35]

P. T. Jochym, K. Parlinski, and M. Sternik, TiC lattice dynamics from ab initio calculations, Eur. Phys. J. B. 10, 9 (1999)

work page 1999
[36]

P. T. Jochym and K. Parlinski, Ab initio lattice dynamics and elastic constants of ZrC, Eur. Phys. J. B.15, 265 (2000)

work page 2000
[37]

J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996). 7 SUPPLEMENT AL MA TERIAL: ACOUSTICALL Y-DRIVEN MAGNONS IN CRSBR BILA YERS Continuous model of interlayer exchange Using the intralayer exchange coupling constantsJ a = 4.27 meV,J b = 3.76 meV,J ab = 7.6 meV from [22] we formulated t...

work page 1996

[1] [1]

we obtain the following values for the intralayer ex- change parameters:A a = 13.36 meV,A b = 23.12 meV, Aab = 17.1 meV in the continuum limit (see Supplemen- tal Material [23]). The spin dynamics is described by a set of Landau- Lifshitz-Gilbert (LLG) equations:    ∂n1 ∂t = γ0 ns n1 × δE0 δn1 +α n1 × ∂n1 ∂t , ∂n2 ∂t = γ0 ns n2 × δE0 δn2 +α n2 × ∂n...

work page

[2] [2]

K. S. Novoselov, A. K. Geim, S. V. Morozov, D.-e. Jiang, Y. Zhang, S. V. Dubonos, I. V. Grigorieva, and A. A. Firsov, Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films, Science306, 666 (2004)

work page 2004

[3] [3]

Y. Luo, J. Zhao, A. Fieramosca, Q. Guo, H. Kang, X. Liu, T. C. H. Liew, D. Sanvitto, Z. An, S. Ghosh, Z. Wang, H. Xu, and Q. Xiong, Strong light-matter coupling in van der Waals materials, Light Sci. Appl.13, 203 (2024)

work page 2024

[4] [4]

W. Tang, H. Liu, Z. Li, A. Pan, and Y.-J. Zeng, Spin- orbit torque in van der Waals-layered materials and het- erostructures, Adv. Sci.8, 2100847 (2021)

work page 2021

[5] [5]

Huang, G

B. Huang, G. Clark, E. Navarro-Moratalla, D. R. Klein, R. Cheng, K. L. Seyler, D. Zhong, E. Schmidgall, M. A. McGuire, D. H. Cobden, W. Yao, D. Xiao, P. Jarillo- Herrero, and X. Xu, Layer-dependent ferromagnetism in a van der Waals crystal down to the monolayer limit, Nature546, 270 (2017)

work page 2017

[6] [6]

H. H. Kim, B. Yang, T. Patel, F. Sfigakis, C. Li, S. Tian, H. Lei, and A. W. Tsen, One million percent tunnel mag- netoresistance in a magnetic van der Waals heterostruc- ture, Nano Lett.18, 4885 (2018)

work page 2018

[7] [7]

Jiang, L

S. Jiang, L. Li, Z. Wang, K. F. Mak, and J. Shan, Con- trolling magnetism in 2D CrI 3 by electrostatic doping, Nat. Nanotechnol.13, 549 (2018)

work page 2018

[8] [8]

Z. Sun, Y. Yi, T. Song, G. Clark, B. Huang, Y. Shan, S. Wu, D. Huang, C. Gao, Z. Chen, M. McGuire, T. Cao, D. Xiao, W.-T. Liu, W. Yao, X. Xu, and S. Wu, Giant nonreciprocal second-harmonic generation from antifer- romagnetic bilayer CrI3, Nature572, 497 (2019)

work page 2019

[9] [9]

Zhumagulov, S

Y. Zhumagulov, S. Chiavazzo, I. A. Shelykh, and O. Kyri- ienko, Robust polaritons in magnetic monolayers of CrI3, Phys. Rev. B108, L161402 (2023)

work page 2023

[10] [10]

Huang, M

B. Huang, M. A. McGuire, A. F. May, D. Xiao, P. Jarillo- Herrero, and X. Xu, Emergent phenomena and proximity effects in two-dimensional magnets and heterostructures, Nat. Mater.19, 1276 (2020)

work page 2020

[11] [11]

N. P. Wilson, K. Lee, J. Cenker, K. Xie, A. H. Dismukes, E. J. Telford, J. Fonseca, S. Sivakumar, C. Dean, T. Cao, X. Roy, X. Xu, and X. Zhu, Interlayer electronic coupling on demand in a 2D magnetic semiconductor, Nat. Mater. 20, 1657 (2021)

work page 2021

[12] [12]

F. Wu, I. Guti´ errez-Lezama, S. A. L´ opez-Paz, M. Gib- ertini, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, F. O. von Rohr, N. Ubrig, and A. F. Morpurgo, Quasi-1D electronic trans- port in a 2D magnetic semiconductor, Adv. Mater.34, 2109759 (2022)

work page 2022

[13] [13]

Boix-Constant, S

C. Boix-Constant, S. Ma˜ nas-Valero, A. M. Ruiz, A. Ry- bakov, K. A. Konieczny, S. Pillet, J. J. Baldov´ ı, and E. Coronado, Probing the spin dimensionality in single-layer CrSBr van der Waals heterostructures by magneto-transport measurements, Adv. Mater.34, 2204940 (2022)

work page 2022

[14] [14]

K. Lee, A. H. Dismukes, E. J. Telford, R. A. Wiscons, J. Wang, X. Xu, C. Nuckolls, C. R. Dean, X. Roy, and X. Zhu, Magnetic order and symmetry in the 2D semi- conductor CrSBr, Nano Lett.21, 3511 (2021)

work page 2021

[15] [15]

E. J. Telford, A. H. Dismukes, K. Lee, M. Cheng, A. Wi- eteska, A. K. Bartholomew, Y.-S. Chen, X. Xu, A. N. Pasupathy, X. Zhu, C. R. Dean, and X. Roy, Layered antiferromagnetism induces large negative magnetoresis- tance in the van der waals semiconductor CrSBr, Adv. Mater.32, 2003240 (2020)

work page 2020

[16] [16]

Wang, S.-S

Y. Wang, S.-S. Wang, Y. Lu, J. Jiang, and S. A. Yang, Strain-induced isostructural and magnetic phase transi- tions in monolayer MoN 2, Nano Lett.16, 4576 (2016)

work page 2016

[17] [17]

Cenker, S

J. Cenker, S. Sivakumar, K. Xie, A. Miller, P. Thijssen, Z. Liu, A. Dismukes, J. Fonseca, E. Anderson, X. Zhu, X. Roy, D. Xiao, J.-H. Chu, T. Cao, and X. Xu, Re- versible strain-induced magnetic phase transition in a van der Waals magnet, Nat. Nanotechnol.17, 256 (2022)

work page 2022

[18] [18]

Bagani, A

K. Bagani, A. Vervelaki, D. Jetter, A. Devarakonda, M. A. Tschudin, B. Gross, D. G. Chica, D. A. Broad- way, C. R. Dean, X. Roy, P. Maletinsky, and M. Poggio, Imaging strain-controlled magnetic reversal in thin crsbr, Nano Lett.24, 13068 (2024)

work page 2024

[19] [19]

N. Liu, C. Wang, Y. Zhang, F. Pang, Z. Cheng, Y. Zhang, and W. Ji, Intralayer strain tuned interlayer magnetism in bilayer CrSBr, Phys. Rev. B109, 214422 (2024)

work page 2024

[20] [20]

A. V. Chumak, V. I. Vasyuchka, A. A. Serga, and B. Hillebrands, Magnon spintronics, Nat. Phys.11, 453 (2015)

work page 2015

[21] [21]

Sadovnikov, A

A. Sadovnikov, A. Grachev, S. Sheshukova, Y. P. Sharaevskii, A. Serdobintsev, D. Mitin, and S. Nikitov, Magnon straintronics: Reconfigurable spin-wave routing in strain-controlled bilateral magnetic stripes, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 257203 (2018)

work page 2018

[22] [22]

Y. J. Bae, J. Wang, A. Scheie, J. Xu, D. G. Chica, G. M. Diederich, J. Cenker, M. E. Ziebel, Y. Bai, H. Ren, C. R. Dean, M. Delor, X. Xu, X. Roy, A. D. Kent, and X. Zhu, Exciton-coupled coherent magnons in a 2D semiconduc- tor, Nature609, 282 (2022)

work page 2022

[23] [23]

Scheie, M

A. Scheie, M. Ziebel, D. G. Chica, Y. J. Bae, X. Wang, A. I. Kolesnikov, X. Zhu, and X. Roy, Spin waves and magnetic exchange Hamiltonian in CrSBr, Adv. Sci.9, 2202467 (2022)

work page 2022

[24] [24]

[29–36],

See Supplemental Material at url for the derivation con- tinuous model of interlayer exchange, the derivation LLG equations and the details of the DFT calculations, which also cites Refs. [29–36],

work page

[25] [25]

T. M. J. Cham, D. G. Chica, X. Huang, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, X. Roy, Y. K. Luo, and D. C. Ralph, Spin-filter tunneling detection of antiferromagnetic res- onance with electrically tunable damping, Science389, 479 (2025)

work page 2025

[26] [26]

G¨ oser, W

O. G¨ oser, W. Paul, and H. Kahle, Magnetic properties of CrSBr, J.Magn. Magn. Mater.92, 129 (1990)

work page 1990

[27] [27]

Stetzuhn, A

N. Stetzuhn, A. M. Kumar, S. Kovalchuk, D. Yagodkin, L. Simon, S. Ma˜ nas-Valero, E. Coronado, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, D. Gill, S. Sharma, P. Brouwer, C. von Korff Schmising, S. Eisebitt, and K. I. Bolotin, Tun- able magnons in a dual-gated 2D antiferromagnet (2025), arXiv:2506.02185 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

work page arXiv 2025

[28] [28]

P. S. Shaban, I. S. Lobanov, V. M. Uzdin, and I. V. Iorsh, Skyrmion dynamics in moir´ e magnets, Phys. Rev. B108, 174440 (2023)

work page 2023

[29] [29]

F. Fei, Y. Mao, W. Fang, W. Liu, J. P. Rollins, A. L. N. Kondusamy, B. Lv, Y. Ping, Y. Wang, and J. Xiao, Spin-mechanical coupling in 2d antiferromagnet crsbr, Nano Letters24, 10467 (2024), pMID: 39096282, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c01751

work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c01751 2024

[30] [30]

J. J. Mortensen, A. H. Larsen, M. Kuisma, A. V. Ivanov, A. Taghizadeh, A. Peterson, A. Haldar, A. O. Dohn, C. Sch¨ afer, E.¨O. J´ onsson,et al., GPAW: An open python package for electronic structure calculations, J. Chem. Phys.160(2024). 6

work page 2024

[31] [31]

J. J. Mortensen, L. B. Hansen, and K. W. Jacobsen, Real- space grid implementation of the projector augmented wave method, Phys. Rev. B—Condensed Matter and Ma- terials Physics71, 035109 (2005)

work page 2005

[32] [32]

Enkovaara, C

J. Enkovaara, C. Rostgaard, J. J. Mortensen, J. Chen, M. Du lak, L. Ferrighi, J. Gavnholt, C. Glinsvad, V. Haikola, H. A. Hansen, H. H. Kristoffersen, M. Kuisma, A. H. Larsen, L. Lehtovaara, M. Ljung- berg, O. Lopez-Acevedo, P. G. Moses, J. Ojanen, T. Olsen, V. Petzold, N. A. Romero, J. Stausholm- Møller, M. Strange, G. A. Tritsaris, M. Vanin, M. Walter, ...

work page 2010

[33] [33]

A. H. Larsen, M. Kuisma, J. L¨ ofgren, Y. Pouillon, P. Erhart, and P. Hyldgaard, libvdwxc: A library for exchange–correlation functionals in the vdW-DF family, Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng.25, 065004 (2017)

work page 2017

[34] [34]

P. T. Jochym, Release v5. 1.0-14-g6596fd4 (2018)

work page 2018

[35] [35]

P. T. Jochym, K. Parlinski, and M. Sternik, TiC lattice dynamics from ab initio calculations, Eur. Phys. J. B. 10, 9 (1999)

work page 1999

[36] [36]

P. T. Jochym and K. Parlinski, Ab initio lattice dynamics and elastic constants of ZrC, Eur. Phys. J. B.15, 265 (2000)

work page 2000

[37] [37]

J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996). 7 SUPPLEMENT AL MA TERIAL: ACOUSTICALL Y-DRIVEN MAGNONS IN CRSBR BILA YERS Continuous model of interlayer exchange Using the intralayer exchange coupling constantsJ a = 4.27 meV,J b = 3.76 meV,J ab = 7.6 meV from [22] we formulated t...

work page 1996