pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.13136 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-14 · 🌌 astro-ph.EP · astro-ph.IM

Recognition: unknown

The Material Point Method (MPM) for simulating hypervelocity impact on asteroids

Xiaoran Yan , Patrick Michel , Ruichen Ni , Yifei Jiao , Junfeng Li
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 14:34 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.EP astro-ph.IM
keywords Material Point Methodhypervelocity impactasteroid fragmentationnumerical simulationplanetary defenseasteroid evolution
0
0 comments X

The pith

The Material Point Method reproduces large coherent fragments like those on asteroid Eros when simulating hypervelocity impacts.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces the Material Point Method to model the short, extreme fragmentation stage of asteroid collisions. Traditional hydrocodes struggle with complex interior structures, surfaces, and contact mechanics, while MPM provides better handling of interfaces and boundaries. The implementation adds a pressure-dependent yield criterion and a resolution-independent Grady-Kipp fragmentation model for geological materials. Validation against laboratory experiments and SPH simulations confirms accuracy at lab scales. Application to asteroid-scale events produces large, coherent fragments matching observations of (433) Eros.

Core claim

The Material Point Method implementation, incorporating a pressure-dependent C^1 continuous yield criterion with quantifiable plastic strain and a resolution-independent Grady-Kipp fragmentation model, when applied to asteroid-scale collisions, successfully reproduces the formation of large, coherent fragments analogous to (433) Eros.

What carries the argument

The Material Point Method (MPM) enhanced with a pressure-dependent yield criterion and Grady-Kipp fragmentation model to capture geological material behavior under extreme conditions.

If this is right

  • Expands the parameter space that can be explored in asteroid impact simulations.
  • Enables treatment of complex contact and boundary conditions that are difficult for traditional hydrocodes.
  • Supports more realistic simulations of asteroid evolution, family formation, and planetary defense scenarios.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • MPM could be combined with other techniques to address internal asteroid structures at multiple scales.
  • The method opens paths to simulate specific planetary defense deflection outcomes with varied surface and contact details.

Load-bearing premise

The laboratory-validated MPM with the given yield criterion and fragmentation model will accurately capture the physics of geological materials at the much larger scales, velocities, and durations of asteroid collisions.

What would settle it

If fragment size distributions and shapes from MPM simulations of specific impact conditions fail to match those observed in asteroid families formed by comparable events.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.13136 by Junfeng Li, Patrick Michel, Ruichen Ni, Xiaoran Yan, Yifei Jiao.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Illustration of MPM framework. a. Initially discretizing the material domain into a group of Lagrangian material points and predefining a regular background grid. b. In each timestep, mapping the mass and momentum of the material points to the background grid nodes, to solve the momentum equations as well as the boundary conditions. c. The material points moving along the deformation of the grid, allowing … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Illustration of the yield surfaces for various strength models: a. in the principal stress space, and b. in the 𝑝–𝜏 plane. The enlarged view in b also compares two algorithms that return the elastic stress trial solution to the yield surface: the plasticity correction based on the flow rules, and the deviatoric stress scaling by the factor 𝜎Y∕𝜏 ∗ . the initial temperature, and Δ𝑄 is derived from Eq. (40). … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Representation of the Tillotson EOS in the 𝜇–𝐸 space: a. the regions of the states, and b. gradation and contours of pressure 𝑝, with the dashed lines correlating with the divisions of regions from (a). The horizontal axis is labeled as 𝜇 = 𝜌∕𝜌0− 1. The value 𝐸iv refers to the specific energy when the material is incipiently vaporized, while 𝐸cv corresponds to the state of complete vaporization. The quanti… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Schematic of the laboratory impact experiments on spherical basalt targets performed by Nakamura and Fujiwara (1991). The nominal case is annotated, where the impact angle 𝛼 = 30◦ . Further simulations encompass the influence of measurement errors, such as the mass of impactors, and the angle or relative velocity of the impact. experiment yielded a core-shaped major remnant, and statistically revealed a po… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Development of the failure ratio of the basalt target with different precision. a. Increase in the ratio of failure points over time. Each color corresponds to a specific discretization precision, indicated by the spacing between material points (dpoint). The total number of material points (N) discretizing the target basalt sphere is also noted. The orange dashed line corresponds to the half-particle-numb… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Cross-sectional views along the symmetry plane at 100 µs for different discretization precisions. The top row displays the degree of damage greater than 0.9 for each point (considered as failed), while the bottom row shows point velocity distributions. Discretization precision decreases from left to right, and the third column corresponds to the half-particle number scenario, taking advantage of the symmet… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Snapshots at 10, 20, 30, 40, and 100 µs of the nominal impact case under the discretization precision of 0.8 mm inter–particle spacing. Shown are the degrees of damage ranging from 0 to 1 in the central symmetry plane. correspond very well to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Shape and position of the fragments in a central clip, 100 µs after the impact. The core-shaped major fragment is painted in red, and others are colored by their identifying number generated during the fragment search. This fragment searching algorithm generates 826 fragments in the nominal case, which are presented in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The cumulative mass distribution of fragments obtained from MPM simulation (orange diamonds), in comparison with the experimental results (black circles), the SPH calculation (blue asterisks, lighter shade at 40 µs while darker at 440 µs), and the predicted power-law mass distribution of comminuted fragments (gray dashed line). linking protrusions and their main body. Besides, the normalized mass distribut… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The mass-velocity distribution of fragments for the experimentally-measured results (black circles) associated with 3𝜎 error bars (solid lines), the SPH calculation (blue asterisks), the MPM simulation (orange diamonds), and the predicted power-law relation (gray dashed line). Comparing the situations that have the same impact angle 𝛼 = 30◦ (measured from the surface normal, as illustrated in [PITH_FULL_… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Schematic of a pseudo catastrophic collision between S-type asteroids. The simulation involves a 3.3-km-diameter basalt spheroidal asteroid colliding with another 25-km-diameter basalt spheroidal target, at a velocity of 5 km s−1 and a 45◦ impact angle. X. Yan et al.: Preprint submitted to Elsevier Page 19 of 35 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: The degree of damage at 15 s after impact, presented in a central symmetrical cross-section. Linear hardening strength model is used in the ’a’ series, and the modified Lundborg model in the ’b’ series. The ’1’ series employs Weibull parameters consistent with the nominal case of laboratory impact simulation, while the ’2’ series sets the same average largest activation stress. Velocity (m/s) 100 0 a1 Vel… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Velocity profiles at 15 s post-impact, visualized on a central symmetrical cross-section. The same grouping methodology as previously described in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: The largest fragment (left) of asteroid collision in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Snapshot at 17 µs of the simulation case using modified Lundborg strength model with 𝑌0 = 10 MPa in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: The leapfrog central difference explicit integration scheme. Besides, it’s necessary to choose one form of the different MPM schemes, meaning the different grid nodal velocity fields being employed when updating the stress state. The stress could be updated at the beginning of the 𝑛-th time step with the grid nodal momentum 𝑷 𝑛−1∕2 𝐼 called the Update-Stress-First (USF) scheme (Bardenhagen, 2002), at the … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Shock-physics numerical codes are essential tools for describing the short but extreme fragmentation stage of the hypervelocity impact process on asteroids. However, accurately representing complex interior structures, surfaces, and contact mechanics in these events remains a significant challenge for traditional hydrocodes. This study introduces and validates an innovative yet underutilized technique, i.e., the Material Point Method (MPM), to simulate hyper-velocity impacts on asteroids. This approach offers new perspectives and solutions for capturing complex interfaces and handling the contact and boundary conditions in asteroid impact simulations. Our MPM implementation incorporates critical improvements to material models, including a pressure-dependent C^1 continuous yield criterion with quantifiable plastic strain, and a resolution-independent Grady-Kipp fragmentation model, to capture the complex physics of geological materials under extreme conditions. The framework is rigorously validated against laboratory impact experiments and benchmarked with smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) simulations, confirming its robustness and precision. Crucially, when applied to asteroid-scale collisions, our model successfully reproduces the formation of large, coherent fragments analogous to (433) Eros. This work establishes MPM as a validated and powerful extension to the planetary scientist's toolkit, enabling the expansion of the parameter space and the treatment of complex contact and boundary conditions, which will enable more realistic simulations of asteroid evolution, family formation, and planetary defense scenarios.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces the Material Point Method (MPM) for hypervelocity impact simulations on asteroids. It incorporates a pressure-dependent C¹ continuous yield criterion with quantifiable plastic strain and a resolution-independent Grady-Kipp fragmentation model. The implementation is validated against laboratory impact experiments and benchmarked against smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) simulations. Application to asteroid-scale collisions is shown to reproduce the formation of large, coherent fragments analogous to those of (433) Eros.

Significance. If the validations hold, this establishes MPM as a practical extension to existing hydrocodes for asteroid impact modeling, with advantages in handling complex interfaces, contacts, and boundary conditions. The combination of lab validation, SPH benchmarking, and reproduction of Eros-like fragments at larger scales could support expanded studies of asteroid family formation and planetary defense. The provision of implementation details strengthens reproducibility.

major comments (1)
  1. [Asteroid-scale simulation section] Asteroid-scale simulation section: the central claim that the model reproduces large coherent fragments analogous to (433) Eros rests on extrapolation of the lab-validated yield criterion and Grady-Kipp model. A quantitative comparison (e.g., fragment size distribution statistics or velocity histograms) to observed Eros properties, or a sensitivity test to scale-dependent parameters, is needed to substantiate the scaling assumption.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the statement of 'rigorous validation' and 'confirming its robustness and precision' would be more informative if key quantitative metrics (e.g., RMS errors or correlation coefficients from lab/SPH comparisons) were summarized.
  2. [Material model description] Material model description: the pressure-dependent yield criterion is described as C¹ continuous, but an explicit equation or reference to its functional form (including how plastic strain is quantified) would aid readers in reproducing the implementation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our work and the recommendation for minor revision. The single major comment is addressed point-by-point below, with a proposed revision to strengthen the asteroid-scale section.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Asteroid-scale simulation section] Asteroid-scale simulation section: the central claim that the model reproduces large coherent fragments analogous to (433) Eros rests on extrapolation of the lab-validated yield criterion and Grady-Kipp model. A quantitative comparison (e.g., fragment size distribution statistics or velocity histograms) to observed Eros properties, or a sensitivity test to scale-dependent parameters, is needed to substantiate the scaling assumption.

    Authors: We agree that the asteroid-scale application involves extrapolation of the laboratory-validated yield criterion and Grady-Kipp fragmentation model, and that the current comparison to Eros is primarily qualitative. The section is intended to demonstrate that the MPM framework, once validated at laboratory scales and benchmarked against SPH, can produce large coherent fragments under asteroid impact conditions using the same constitutive models. To address the concern, the revised manuscript will incorporate a sensitivity analysis on key scale-dependent parameters (such as the Grady-Kipp fragmentation threshold and pressure-dependent yield strength scaling factors) to illustrate robustness of the large-fragment outcome. We will also add a brief discussion referencing available observational constraints on Eros fragment sizes, while explicitly noting limitations arising from uncertainties in the asteroid's internal structure and material properties. These additions will be placed in an expanded asteroid-scale simulation section. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper's central claims rest on external laboratory impact experiments and independent SPH benchmarking for validation of the MPM implementation, yield criterion, and Grady-Kipp fragmentation model. The asteroid-scale application to reproduce Eros-like fragments is presented as a downstream use of this validated framework rather than a fitted or self-referential prediction. No load-bearing steps reduce by construction to internal inputs, self-citations, or ansatzes; all described improvements and results draw from independent external benchmarks, rendering the derivation self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract provides insufficient detail to identify concrete free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the central claim rests on the unstated assumption that the MPM framework plus the two named model improvements generalize from lab to asteroid scales.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5547 in / 1125 out tokens · 34545 ms · 2026-05-10T14:34:06.302880+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2020, Science, 368, 67, doi: 10.1126/science.aaz1701

    Arakawa, M., Saiki, T., Wada, K., Ogawa, K., Kadono, T., Shirai, K., Sawada, H., Ishibashi, K., Honda, R., Sakatani, N., Iijima, Y., Okamoto, C., Yano,H.,Takagi,Y.,Hayakawa,M.,Michel,P.,Jutzi,M.,Shimaki,Y.,Kimura,S.,Mimasu,Y.,Toda,T.,Imamura,H.,Nakazawa,S.,Hayakawa, H., Sugita, S., Morota, T., Kameda, S., Tatsumi, E., Cho, Y., Yoshioka, K., Yokota, Y., Ma...

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aaz1701 2020

  2. [2]

    Space Science Reviews 208, 187–212

    Scientific Objectives of Small Carry-on Impactor (SCI) and Deployable Camera 3 Digital (DCAM3-D): Observation of an Ejecta Curtain and a Crater Formed on the Surface of Ryugu by an Artificial High-Velocity Impact. Space Science Reviews 208, 187–212. URL:http: //dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11214-016-0290-z, doi:10.1007/s11214-016-0290-z. X. Yan et al.:Preprint sub...

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-016-0290-z

  3. [3]

    Nature Astronomy 9, 347–357

    Seismic resurfacing of 433 Eros indicative of a highly dissipative interior for large near-Earth asteroids. Nature Astronomy 9, 347–357. URL:https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41550-024-02411-8, doi:10.1038/s41550-024-02411-8. Bardenhagen, S.,

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-024-02411-8

  4. [4]

    Journal of Computational Physics 180, 383–403

    Energy conservation error in the material point method for solid mechanics. Journal of Computational Physics 180, 383–403. URL:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021999102971032, doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/ jcph.2002.7103. Bardenhagen, S.G., Guilkey, J.E., Roessig, K.M., Brackbill, J.U., Witzel, W.M., Foster, J.C.,

    work page arXiv 2002

  5. [5]

    Effective Collision Strengths for Hydro gen and Hydrogen-Like Ions,

    The generalized interpolation material point method. CMES - Computer Modeling in Engineering and Sciences 5, 477–495. Benz,W.,Asphaug,E.,1994. Impactsimulationswithfracture.I.methodandtests. Icarus107,98–116. URL:https://linkinghub.elsevier. com/retrieve/pii/S0019103584710098, doi:10.1006/icar.1994.1009. Benz,W.,Asphaug,E.,1995. Simulationsofbrittlesolids...

    work page doi:10.1006/icar.1994.1009 1994

  6. [6]

    Icarus 324, 41–76

    Compositional distributions and evolutionary processes for the near-Earth object population: Results from the MIT-Hawaii Near-Earth Object Spectroscopic Survey (MITHNEOS). Icarus 324, 41–76. URL:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2018.12.035, doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2018.12.035. Bottke,W.F.,Vokrouhlický,D.,Marshall,R.,Nesvorný,D.,Morbidelli,A.,Deienno,R.,March...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2018.12.035 2018

  7. [7]

    Brundage, A.L.,

    URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/PSJ/ace7cd, doi:10.3847/psj/ace7cd. Brundage, A.L.,

    work page doi:10.3847/psj/ace7cd

  8. [8]

    Procedia Engineering 58, 461–470

    Implementation of Tillotson equation of state for hypervelocity impact of metals, geologic materials, and liquids. Procedia Engineering 58, 461–470. URL:https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1877705813009594, doi:10.1016/j.proeng. 2013.05.053. Burgess, D., Sulsky, D., Brackbill, J.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.proeng 2013

  9. [9]

    Approximate riemann solvers, parameter vectors, and difference schemes

    Mass matrix formulation of the FLIP particle-in-cell method. Journal of Computational Physics 103, 1–15. URL:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/002199919290323Q, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0021-9991(92)90323-Q. Buruchenko, S.K., Schäfer, C.M., Maindl, T.I.,

    work page arXiv

  10. [10]

    Procedia Engineering 204, 59–66

    Smooth Particle Hydrodynamics GPU-Acceleration Tool for Asteroid Fragmentation Simulation. Procedia Engineering 204, 59–66. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.726. Chen, W.D., Zhang, F., Yang, W.M.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.726 2017

  11. [11]

    Key Engineering Materials 525-526, 97–100

    Simulation of spall fracture based on material point method. Key Engineering Materials 525-526, 97–100. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.525-526.97. Cheng,A.F.,Agrusa,H.F.,Barbee,B.W.,Meyer,A.J.,Farnham,T.L.,Raducan,S.D.,Richardson,D.C.,Dotto,E.,Zinzi,A.,DellaCorte,V.,Statler, T.S., Chesley, S., Naidu, S.P., Hirabayashi, M., Li, J.Y., Eggl, S., Barnouin...

    work page doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.525-526.97

  12. [12]

    F., Agrusa, H

    Momentum transfer from the DART mission kinetic impact on asteroid Dimorphos. Nature 616, 457–460. doi:10.1038/s41586-023-05878-z. Collins, G.S., Melosh, H.J., Ivanov, B.A.,

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-023-05878-z

  13. [13]

    S., Melosh, H

    Modeling damage and deformation in impact simulations. Meteoritics and Planetary Science 39, 217–231. doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2004.tb00337.x. Daly, R.T., Ernst, C.M., Barnouin, O.S., Chabot, N.L., Rivkin, A.S., Cheng, A.F., Adams, E.Y., Agrusa, H.F., Abel, E.D., Alford, A.L., Asphaug, E.I., Atchison, J.A., Badger, A.R., Baki, P., Ballouz, R.L., Bekker, D....

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2004.tb00337.x 1945

  14. [14]

    T., Ernst, C

    Successful kinetic impact into an asteroid for planetary defence. Nature 616, 443–447. doi:10.1038/s41586-023-05810-5. Demeo, F.E., Carry, B.,

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-023-05810-5

  15. [15]

    Nature 505, 629–634

    Solar System evolution from compositional mapping of the asteroid belt. Nature 505, 629–634. URL:http: //dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature12908, doi:10.1038/nature12908,arXiv:1408.2787. Drucker, D.C., Prager, W.,

    work page doi:10.1038/nature12908

  16. [16]

    Icarus 321, 1013–1025

    A new hybrid framework for simulating hypervelocity asteroid impacts and gravitational reaccumulation. Icarus 321, 1013–1025. URL:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2018.12.032, doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2018. 12.032. Elbeshausen, D., Wünnemann, K., Collins, G.S.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2018.12.032 2018

  17. [17]

    Icarus 204, 716–731

    Scaling of oblique impacts in frictional targets: Implications for crater size and formation mechanisms. Icarus 204, 716–731. URL:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2009.07.018, doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2009.07

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2009.07.018 2009

  18. [18]

    Icarus 350, 113871

    The role of fragment shapes in the simulations of asteroids as gravitational aggregates. Icarus 350, 113871. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2020.113871, doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2020.113871,arXiv:2005.14032. Flynn, G.J., Consolmagno, G.J., Brown, P., Macke, R.J.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2020.113871 2020

  19. [19]

    Chemie der Erde 78, 269–298

    Physical properties of the stone meteorites: Implications for the properties of their parent bodies. Chemie der Erde 78, 269–298. URL:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemer.2017.04.002, doi:10.1016/j.chemer. 2017.04.002. Fujiwara, A., Tsukamoto, A.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.chemer.2017.04.002 2017

  20. [20]

    E., Kipp, M

    Continuum modelling of explosive fracture in oil shale. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and 17, 147–157. doi:10.1016/0148-9062(80)91361-3. Güldemeister,N.,Moreau,J.G.,Kohout,T.,Luther,R.,Wünnemann,K.,2022. InsightintotheDistributionofHigh-pressureShockMetamorphism inRubble-pileAsteroids. PlanetaryScienceJournal3,198. URL:http:/...

    work page doi:10.1016/0148-9062(80)91361-3 2022

  21. [21]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 527, 10348–10357

    SPH–DEM modelling of hypervelocity impacts on rubble-pile asteroids. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 527, 10348–10357. URL:https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/527/4/10348/7478001, doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3888. Jutzi, M.,

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3888

  22. [22]

    doi:10.1016/j.pss.2014.09.012

    SPH calculations of asteroid disruptions: The role of pressure dependent failure models. Planetary and Space Science 107, 3–9. URL:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2014.09.012, doi:10.1016/j.pss.2014.09.012. Jutzi, M., Benz, W., Michel, P.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.pss.2014.09.012 2014

  23. [23]

    Numerical simulations of impacts involving porous bodies. I. implementing sub-resolution porosity in a 3D SPH hydrocode. Icarus 198, 242–255. URL:10.1016/j.icarus.2008.06.013, doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2008.06.013. Jutzi, M., Holsapple, K., Wünneman, K., Michel, P.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2008.06.013 2008

  24. [24]

    doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2020.113867

    Collisional heating and compaction of small bodies: Constraints for their origin and evolution. Icarus 350, 113867. URL:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2020.113867, doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2020.113867,arXiv:2005.12785. Lian, Y.P., Zhang, X., Liu, Y.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2020.113867 2020

  25. [25]

    Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 200, 3482–3494

    Coupling of finite element method with material point method by local multi-mesh contact method. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 200, 3482–3494. URL:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2011.07.014, doi:10.1016/j.cma.2011.07.014. Liang, Y., Zhang, X., Liu, Y.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cma.2011.07.014 2011

  26. [26]

    Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 352, 85–109

    An efficient staggered grid material point method. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 352, 85–109. URL:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2019.04.024, doi:10.1016/j.cma.2019.04.024. Liu,P.,Liu,Y.,Zhang,X.,Guan,Y.,2015. Investigationonhigh-velocityimpactofmicronparticlesusingmaterialpointmethod. InternationalJour- nal of Impact Engineering 75...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cma.2019.04.024 2019

  27. [27]

    International Journal of Mechanics and Materials in Design 15, 361–378

    Investigating the cold spraying process with the material point method. International Journal of Mechanics and Materials in Design 15, 361–378. URL:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10999-018-9419-4, doi:10.1007/s10999-018-9419-4. Lundborg, N.,

    work page doi:10.1007/s10999-018-9419-4

  28. [28]

    International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts4(3), 269–272 (1967)

    Strength of rock-like materials. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts 5,427–454. URL:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0148906268900466,doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0148-9062(68)90046-6. Luther, R., Raducan, S.D., Burger, C., Wünnemann, K., Jutzi, M., Schäfer, C.M., Koschny, D., Davison, T.M....

    work page arXiv

  29. [29]

    Ma,S.,Zhang,X.,Qiu,X.M.,2009.ComparisonstudyofMPMandSPHinmodelinghypervelocityimpactproblems.InternationalJournalofImpact Engineering 36, 272–282

    URL:https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/PSJ/ac8b89, doi:10.3847/PSJ/ac8b89. Ma,S.,Zhang,X.,Qiu,X.M.,2009.ComparisonstudyofMPMandSPHinmodelinghypervelocityimpactproblems.InternationalJournalofImpact Engineering 36, 272–282. URL:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2008.07.001, doi:10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2008.07.001. McGlaun, J.M., Thompson, S.L., Elrick, M.G.,

    work page doi:10.3847/psj/ac8b89 2009

  30. [30]

    International Journal of Impact Engineering 10, 351–360

    CTH: A three-dimensional shock wave physics code. International Journal of Impact Engineering 10, 351–360. doi:10.1016/0734-743X(90)90071-3. Melosh, H.J., Ryan, E.V., Asphaug, E.,

    work page doi:10.1016/0734-743x(90)90071-3

  31. [31]

    Journal of GeophysicalResearch:Planets97,14735–14759

    Dynamic fragmentation in impacts: Hydrocode simulation of laboratory impacts. Journal of GeophysicalResearch:Planets97,14735–14759. URL:https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/92JE01632, doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/92JE01632. Michel, P., Ballouz, R.L., Barnouin, O.S., Jutzi, M., Walsh, K.J., May, B.H., Manzoni, C., Richardson, D.C., Schwar...

    work page doi:10.1029/92je01632

  32. [32]

    Michel, P., Benz, W., Richardson, D.C.,

    doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16433-z. Michel, P., Benz, W., Richardson, D.C.,

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16433-z

  33. [33]

    C.\ 2003.\ Disruption of fragmented parent bodies as the origin of asteroid families.\ Nature 421, 608–611

    Disruption of fragmented parent bodies as the origin of asteroid families. Nature 421, 608–611. URL:https://www.nature.com/articles/nature01364, doi:10.1038/nature01364. Michel, P., Benz, W., Richardson, D.C.,

    work page doi:10.1038/nature01364

  34. [34]

    Icarus 168, 420–432

    Catastrophic disruption of pre-shattered parent bodies. Icarus 168, 420–432. URL:https: //linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0019103503004342, doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2003.12.011. Michel, P., Benz, W., Tanga, P., Richardson, D.C.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2003.12.011 2003

  35. [35]

    Science 294, 1696–1700

    Collisions and gravitational reaccumulation: Forming asteroid families and satellites. Science 294, 1696–1700. URL:https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.1065189, doi:10.1126/science.1065189. Michel, P., DeMeo, F.E., Bottke, W.F., 2015a. Asteroids: recent advances and new perspectives. Asteroids IV , 3–10. Michel, P., Küppers, M., Bagatin, A.C., ...

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1065189 2022

  36. [36]

    Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse 1913, 582–592

    Mechanik der festen Körper im plastisch- deformablen Zustand. Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse 1913, 582–592. URL:http://eudml.org/doc/58894. Mnjiuza, A., Owen, D., Bicanic, N.,

    1913

  37. [37]

    Engineering Computations 12, 145–174

    A combined finite-discrete element method in transient dynamics of fracturing solids. Engineering Computations 12, 145–174. URL:https://doi.org/10.1108/02644409510799532, doi:10.1108/02644409510799532. Monaghan, J.J.,

    work page doi:10.1108/02644409510799532

  38. [38]

    Journal of Computational Physics 159, 290–311

    SPH without a Tensile Instability. Journal of Computational Physics 159, 290–311. doi:10.1006/jcph.2000.6439. Nairn, J.,

    work page doi:10.1006/jcph.2000.6439 2000

  39. [39]

    Icarus 92, 132–146

    Velocity distribution of fragments formed in a simulated collisional disruption. Icarus 92, 132–146. URL: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/001910359190040Z, doi:10.1016/0019-1035(91)90040-Z. Nakamura, A.M., Michel, P., Setoh, M.,

    work page doi:10.1016/0019-1035(91)90040-z

  40. [40]

    Journal of Geophysical Research 112, E02001

    Weibull parameters of <i>Yakuno<ı> basalt targets used in documented high-velocity impact experiments. Journal of Geophysical Research 112, E02001. URL:http://doi.wiley.com/10.1029/2006JE002757, doi:10.1029/ 2006JE002757. Neumman, J., Richtyer, R.,

    work page doi:10.1029/2006je002757

  41. [41]

    A method for the numerical calculation of hydrodynamical shocks. J. Appl. Phys 21, 232–237. URL: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1699639, doi:10.1063/1.1699639. Ni,R.,Zhang,X.,2020. Aprecisecriticaltimestepformulafortheexplicitmaterialpointmethod. InternationalJournalforNumericalMethodsin Engineering 121, 4989–5016. URL:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/1...

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1699639 2020

  42. [42]

    Adaptive Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics: Methodology. II. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 116, 155–209. doi:10.1086/313100. Pierazzo, E., Artemieva, N., Asphaug, E., Baldwin, E.C., Cazamias, J., Coker, R., Collins, G.S., Crawford, D.A., Davison, T., Elbeshausen, D., Holsapple, K.A., Housen, K.R., Korycansky, D.G., Wünnemann, K.,

    work page doi:10.1086/313100

  43. [43]

    Meteoritics & Planetary Sci- ence43(12), 1917–1938 (2008)

    Validation of numerical codes for impact and explosion cratering: Impacts on strengthless and metal targets. Meteoritics & Planetary Science 43, 1917–1938. URL:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ doi/10.1111/j.1945-5100.2008.tb00653.x, doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2008.tb00653.x. Raducan, S.D., Jutzi, M., Cheng, A.F., Zhang, Y., Barnouin, O., Collins, G.S., Daly,...

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2008.tb00653.x 1917

  44. [44]

    Earth and Space Science 7, 1–10

    Numerical Simulations of Laboratory-Scale, Hypervelocity- Impact Experiments for Asteroid-Deflection Code Validation. Earth and Space Science 7, 1–10. doi:10.1029/2018EA000474. Richardson, J.E., Melosh, H.J., Greenberg, R.,

    work page doi:10.1029/2018ea000474

  45. [45]

    Science 306, 1526–1529

    Impact-Induced Seismic Activity on Asteroid 433 Eros: A Surface Modification Process. Science 306, 1526–1529. URL:https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1104731, doi:10.1126/science.1104731. Richardson, J.E., Melosh, H.J., Greenberg, R.J., O’Brien, D.P., . The global effects of impact-induced seismic activity on fractured asteroid surface morphology ...

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1104731 2005

  46. [46]

    The DART Mission and Advancements in Planetary Defense. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences URL:https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-earth-032524-125929, doi:https://doi.org/ 10.1146/annurev-earth-032524-125929. Schäfer, C., Riecker, S., Maindl, T. I., Speith, R., Scherrer, S., Kley, W.,

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-earth-032524-125929

  47. [47]

    AstronomyandAstrophysics590,A19

    A smooth particle hydrodynamics code to model collisions betweensolid,self-gravitatingobjects. AstronomyandAstrophysics590,A19. URL:https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201528060, doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201528060. Schwartz, S.R., Michel, P., Jutzi, M., Marchi, S., Zhang, Y., Richardson, D.C.,

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201528060

  48. [48]

    Nature Astronomy 2, 379–382

    Catastrophic disruptions as the origin of bilobate comets. Nature Astronomy 2, 379–382. doi:10.1038/s41550-018-0395-2. Shen, L., Zhen, C.,

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-018-0395-2

  49. [49]

    Uintah: a massively parallel problem solving environment, in: Proceedings the Ninth International Symposium on High-Performance Distributed Computing, pp. 33–41. doi:10.1109/HPDC.2000.868632. Stickle, A.M., Bruck Syal, M., Cheng, A.F., Collins, G.S., Davison, T.M., Gisler, G., Güldemeister, N., Heberling, T., Luther, R., Michel, P., Miller, P., Owen, J.M....

    work page doi:10.1109/hpdc.2000.868632 2000

  50. [50]

    Benchmarking impact hydrocodes in the strength regime: Implicationsformodelingdeflectionbyakineticimpactor.Icarus338,113446.URL:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2019.113446, doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2019.113446. X. Yan et al.:Preprint submitted to ElsevierPage 34 of 35 MPM for simulating hypervelocity impact on asteroids Stickle, A.M., DeCoster, M.E., Burger,...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2019.113446 2019

  51. [51]

    Sulsky, D., Chen, Z., Schreyer, H.,

    URL:http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/PSJ/ac91cc, doi:10.3847/PSJ/ac91cc. Sulsky, D., Chen, Z., Schreyer, H.,

    work page doi:10.3847/psj/ac91cc

  52. [52]

    Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 118, 179–196

    A particle method for history-dependent materials. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 118, 179–196. URL:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0045782594901120, doi:10.1016/ 0045-7825(94)90112-0. Sulsky, D., Zhou, S.J., Schreyer, H.L.,

    work page arXiv

  53. [53]

    Computer Physics Communications 87, 236–252

    Application of a particle-in-cell method to solid mechanics. Computer Physics Communications 87, 236–252. URL:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0010465594001707, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0010-4655(94)00170-7. Thomas, C.A., Naidu, S.P., Scheirich, P., Moskovitz, N.A., Pravec, P., Chesley, S.R., Rivkin, A.S., Osip, D.J., Lister, T.A., Be...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-023-05805-2 2023

  54. [54]

    part I: Model formulation and application to ALON

    Multi-scale defect interactions in high-rate brittle material failure. part I: Model formulation and application to ALON. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 86, 117–149. URL:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0022509615302003, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2015.10.007. Tonge, A.L., Ramesh, K., Barnouin, O.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2015.10.007 2015

  55. [55]

    Matthew Weinberg

    A model for impact-induced lineament formation and porosity growth on Eros. Icarus 266, 76–87. URL:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019103515005357, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j. icarus.2015.11.018. Veverka, J., Robinson, M., Thomas, P., Murchie, S., Bell, J.F., Izenberg, N., Chapman, C., Harch, A., Bell, M., Carcich, B., Cheng, A., Cl...

    work page doi:10.1016/j 2015

  56. [56]

    Science289,2088–2097

    NEAR at Eros:Imagingandspectralresults. Science289,2088–2097. URL:https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.289.5487.2088, doi:10.1126/science.289.5487.2088. Ševeček,P.,2021. SimulationsofasteroidcollisionsusingahybridSPH/N-bodyapproach. Ph.D.thesis.CharlesUniversity,AstronomicalInstitute. Walsh, J.B.,

    work page doi:10.1126/science.289.5487.2088 2088

  57. [57]

    Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 56, 593–624

    Rubble Pile Asteroids. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 56, 593–624. URL:https://www.annualreviews. org/doi/10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-052013, doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-052013. Weibull, W.,

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-052013

  58. [58]

    Icarus 180(2), 514–527 (2006)

    A statistical theory of the strength of materials. URL:http://www.barringer1.com/wa_files/ Weibull-1939-Strength-of-Materials.pdf. Wünnemann,K.,Collins,G.S.,Melosh,H.J.,2006. Astrain-basedporositymodelforuseinhydrocodesimulationsofimpactsandimplicationsfor transient crater growth in porous targets. Icarus 180, 514–527. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2005.10.013. Ye...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2005.10.013 1939

  59. [59]

    Science 289, 2085–2088

    Radio science results during the NEAR-Shoemaker spacecraft rendezvous with Eros. Science 289, 2085–2088. doi:10.1126/science.289.5487.2085. Yu, Y., Richardson, D.C., Michel, P.,

    work page doi:10.1126/science.289.5487.2085 2085

  60. [60]

    Astrodynamics 1, 57–69

    Structural analysis of rubble-pile asteroids applied to collisional evolution. Astrodynamics 1, 57–69. doi:10.1007/s42064-017-0005-6,arXiv:1708.00604. Zhang, X., Chen, Z., Liu, Y.,

    work page doi:10.1007/s42064-017-0005-6

  61. [61]

    Astrodynamics 5, 293–329

    Shapes, structures, and evolution of small bodies. Astrodynamics 5, 293–329. doi:10.1007/s42064-021-0128-7. X. Yan et al.:Preprint submitted to ElsevierPage 35 of 35

    work page doi:10.1007/s42064-021-0128-7