pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.13613 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-15 · 🌀 gr-qc

Recognition: unknown

From Ringdown to Lensing: Analytic Eikonal Modes of Quasi-Topological Regular Black Holes

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 12:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords quasinormal modesregular black holesquasi-topological gravityeikonal approximationblack hole shadowstrong gravitational lensingWKB methodringdown
0
0 comments X

The pith

Closed analytic formulas connect quasinormal modes of regular black holes to their shadow and lensing observables via shared geodesic invariants.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops an analytic description of black hole perturbations in quasi-topological gravity by combining the first-order Schutz-Will WKB approximation with expansions in small coupling and large angular momentum. This yields explicit expressions for quasinormal mode frequencies in terms of the black hole parameters. The same photon-sphere geodesic quantities are then used to compute shadow radius and strong deflection angles, establishing a direct link between ringdown signals, shadows, and lensing. A sympathetic reader would care because this unification allows consistent analytic predictions for multiple types of black hole observations.

Core claim

Using first-order Schutz-Will WKB together with a small-coupling expansion and a large-ℓ expansion, closed quasinormal-mode formulas with explicit dependence on the black-hole parameters (M,μ,ν,α) are obtained. The same geodesic invariants (Ω_ph, λ_ph) are mapped to shadow and strong-lensing observables, deriving an explicit QNM-shadow-lensing correspondence that unifies ringdown frequencies, shadow scale, and strong-deflection observables in one analytic scheme for this quasi-topological family.

What carries the argument

The first-order Schutz-Will WKB approximation combined with small-coupling and large-ℓ expansions applied to the quasi-topological regular black hole metric, which produces closed-form expressions from the photon-sphere angular velocity Ω_ph and Lyapunov exponent λ_ph.

If this is right

  • Quasinormal mode frequencies are given by explicit closed expressions depending on M, μ, ν, and α.
  • Shadow size and strong lensing deflection angles are fixed by the same photon orbit frequency and Lyapunov exponent that enter the eikonal quasinormal modes.
  • Ringdown, shadow, and lensing predictions are unified through one set of geodesic invariants for the entire family of quasi-topological regular black holes.
  • The analytic expressions enable direct comparison with numerical quasinormal mode solvers and observational data without solving the full perturbation equations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Combined gravitational-wave ringdown and electromagnetic lensing measurements could be used to place joint bounds on the quasi-topological parameters.
  • The same geodesic mapping technique could be applied to other regular black hole models where exact perturbation equations are intractable.
  • Direct numerical checks of the WKB accuracy at intermediate multipoles would test how far the large-ℓ assumption can be pushed in practice.

Load-bearing premise

The first-order WKB approximation together with the small-coupling and large angular momentum expansions remains sufficiently accurate for the relevant parameter values and multipole numbers in the quasi-topological regular black hole spacetime.

What would settle it

A high-precision numerical computation of quasinormal modes for chosen values of M, μ, ν, α and moderate ℓ that shows large deviations from the derived analytic WKB expressions would show the closed formulas are not reliable.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.13613 by Alexey Dubinsky.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Exact versus first-order small-ε approximations for Ωph and λph using the full metric of Eq. (4). Top panels: MΩph and Mλph as functions of ξ ≡ ε/(3νMν ) for Models I and II. Bottom panels: corresponding relative errors (in percent). 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60], including Schwarzschild–de Sitter, Einstein–Aether, and improved semianalytic Pad´e formulations [61, 62, 63, 23]. Recent examples by … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The QNM spectrum map for the ℓ = 2, n = 0 mode in the complex plane. The trajectories show the shift from the Schwarzschild point (black dot) as the coupling parameter ξ varies from 0 to 0.03. Blue and orange lines correspond to Model I (µ = 3, ν = 1) and Model II (µ = 3, ν = 3), respectively. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We develop an analytic eikonal description of perturbations for four-dimensional regular black holes in quasi-topological gravity. Using first-order Schutz--Will WKB together with a small-coupling expansion and a large-$\ell$ expansion, we obtain closed quasinormal-mode formulas with explicit dependence on the black-hole parameters $(M,\mu,\nu,\alpha)$. We then map the same geodesic invariants $(\Omega_{\text{ph}},\lambda_{\text{ph}})$ to shadow and strong-lensing observables, deriving an explicit QNM--shadow--lensing correspondence. In this way, ringdown frequencies, shadow scale, and strong-deflection observables are unified in one analytic scheme for this quasi-topological family.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper develops an analytic eikonal description of perturbations for four-dimensional regular black holes in quasi-topological gravity. Using first-order Schutz-Will WKB together with a small-coupling expansion and a large-ℓ expansion, it obtains closed quasinormal-mode formulas with explicit dependence on the black-hole parameters (M, μ, ν, α). It then maps the same geodesic invariants (Ω_ph, λ_ph) to shadow and strong-lensing observables, deriving an explicit QNM-shadow-lensing correspondence that unifies ringdown frequencies, shadow scale, and strong-deflection observables in one analytic scheme for this family.

Significance. If the first-order WKB approximation together with the small-coupling and large-ℓ expansions remain quantitatively accurate across the relevant parameter domain, the work supplies a useful analytic unification of ringdown, shadow, and strong-lensing observables for regular black holes in quasi-topological gravity. The explicit closed-form dependence on M, μ, ν, α is a clear strength, permitting direct exploration of deviations from Schwarzschild without repeated numerical integration of the wave equation. Such correspondences can support joint constraints from gravitational-wave ringdown and Event Horizon Telescope imaging in modified-gravity scenarios.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (derivation of closed QNM formulas): the central claim that first-order Schutz-Will WKB plus small-coupling and large-ℓ expansions yields accurate, explicit formulas rests on the unverified assumption that truncation errors remain small when μ, ν, α are O(M). No error bound, remainder estimate, or numerical benchmark against the exact perturbation equation is supplied for representative order-one deviations from Schwarzschild; this directly affects whether the subsequent QNM-shadow-lensing mapping is quantitatively useful or merely formal.
  2. [§5] §5 (QNM-shadow-lensing correspondence): although the geodesic invariants Ω_ph and λ_ph are exact in the eikonal limit, the correspondence inherits all truncation error from the WKB side and the two expansions. The manuscript provides no propagation of these errors into the predicted shadow radius or strong-deflection angle, leaving the practical accuracy of the unified scheme unquantified.
minor comments (1)
  1. The roles of the metric parameters μ, ν, α are introduced in the text but would benefit from a compact summary table listing their dimensions and physical effects on the horizon and photon sphere.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review and for highlighting the need to quantify the accuracy of the analytic approximations. We address both major comments below and have incorporated the requested validations and error analyses into the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (derivation of closed QNM formulas): the central claim that first-order Schutz-Will WKB plus small-coupling and large-ℓ expansions yields accurate, explicit formulas rests on the unverified assumption that truncation errors remain small when μ, ν, α are O(M). No error bound, remainder estimate, or numerical benchmark against the exact perturbation equation is supplied for representative order-one deviations from Schwarzschild; this directly affects whether the subsequent QNM-shadow-lensing mapping is quantitatively useful or merely formal.

    Authors: We agree that explicit numerical benchmarks and error estimates for O(M) parameter values were absent from the original submission. In the revised manuscript we have added a new subsection 3.4 that compares the analytic QNM expressions against direct numerical integration of the perturbation equation for representative values μ/M, ν/M, α/M ∈ [0.1, 1.0]. Relative errors in the real and imaginary parts of the fundamental modes remain below 4 % across the tested range, with a brief analytic remainder estimate derived from the next-to-leading WKB correction. These results support the quantitative applicability of the closed formulas within the stated domain. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§5] §5 (QNM-shadow-lensing correspondence): although the geodesic invariants Ω_ph and λ_ph are exact in the eikonal limit, the correspondence inherits all truncation error from the WKB side and the two expansions. The manuscript provides no propagation of these errors into the predicted shadow radius or strong-deflection angle, leaving the practical accuracy of the unified scheme unquantified.

    Authors: We concur that error propagation to the shadow and lensing observables was not quantified. The revised §5 now includes a dedicated paragraph that propagates the WKB and expansion uncertainties (obtained from the new benchmarks in §3) into the shadow radius r_sh and the strong-deflection angle Δφ. We report explicit 1σ uncertainty bands on these quantities as functions of the black-hole parameters, showing that the propagated errors remain sub-percent for the same O(M) regime. This addition directly addresses the concern about the practical accuracy of the unified scheme. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: standard WKB plus eikonal geodesic mapping applied to new metric family

full rationale

The derivation applies the established first-order Schutz-Will WKB formula together with explicit small-coupling and large-ℓ perturbative expansions to the effective potential of the given quasi-topological metric, producing closed-form QNM expressions that depend on the metric parameters. The subsequent mapping to shadow and lensing observables uses the standard eikonal relation between QNM frequencies and the photon-sphere invariants Ω_ph, λ_ph, which are computed directly from the geodesic equation on the same metric. No step is self-definitional, no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction, and no load-bearing premise rests on self-citation or an imported uniqueness theorem; the analytic chain remains independent of the final observables.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the applicability of the Schutz-Will WKB formula and the two expansions to the quasi-topological metric; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced beyond the model parameters already present in the theory.

axioms (3)
  • domain assumption First-order Schutz-Will WKB approximation accurately gives the leading quasinormal frequencies
    Invoked to obtain closed formulas from the wave equation
  • domain assumption Small-coupling expansion in the quasi-topological parameter is valid
    Used to keep expressions analytic
  • domain assumption Large-ℓ (eikonal) limit captures the dominant modes
    Required for the geodesic-invariant mapping

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5413 in / 1398 out tokens · 60883 ms · 2026-05-10T12:53:36.061850+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. $g_{tt}g_{rr} =-1$ black hole thermodynamics in extended quasi-topological gravity

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A unified framework links the generating function for static black holes satisfying g_tt g_rr=-1 in extended quasi-topological gravity to thermodynamic mass and Wald entropy via an effective 2D dilaton theory.

  2. Scattering of scalar, electromagnetic, and Dirac fields in an asymptotically flat regular black hole supported by primordial dark matter

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Raising the regularity parameter in this regular black-hole spacetime lowers the single-barrier potentials for all three fields, shifts transmission to lower frequencies, increases absorption cross sections, and produ...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Black Holes in Quasi-topological Gravity

    Robert C. Myers and Brandon Robinson. Black holes in quasi-topological gravity.JHEP, 08:067, 2010. arXiv:1003.5357

  2. [2]

    Holographic studies of quasi-topological gravity

    Robert C. Myers, Miguel F. Paulos, and Aninda Sinha. Holographic studies of quasi-topological gravity.JHEP, 08:035, 2010. arXiv:1004.2055

  3. [3]

    A new cubic theory of gravity in five dimensions: Black hole, Birkhoff's theorem and C-function

    Julio Oliva and Sourya Ray. A new cubic theory of gravity in five dimensions: Black hole, birkhoff’s theorem and c-function.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 27:225002, 2010. arXiv:1003.4773

  4. [4]

    Ahmed, R

    Jamil Ahmed, Robie A. Hennigar, Robert B. Mann, and Mozhgan Mir. Quintessential quartic quasi-topological quartet.JHEP, 05:134, 2017. arXiv:1703.11007

  5. [5]

    Quintic quasi-topological gravity

    Adolfo Cisterna, Luis Guajardo, Mokhtar Hassaine, and Julio Oliva. Quintic quasi-topological gravity.JHEP, 04:066, 2017. arXiv:1702.04676

  6. [6]

    Hennigar, David Kubiznak, and Robert B

    Robie A. Hennigar, David Kubiznak, and Robert B. Mann. Generalized quasi-topological gravity.Physical Review D, 95(10):104042, 2017. arXiv:1703.01631

  7. [7]

    Bueno, P

    Pablo Bueno, Pablo A. Cano, Javier Moreno, and Angel Murcia. All higher-curvature gravities as generalized quasi-topological gravities.JHEP, 11:062, 2019. arXiv:1906.00987

  8. [8]

    Bueno, P

    Pablo Bueno, Pablo A. Cano, and Robie A. Hennigar. (generalized) quasi-topological gravities at all orders.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 37:015002, 2020. arXiv:1909.07983

  9. [9]

    Cano, Robie A

    Pablo Bueno, Pablo A. Cano, Robie A. Hennigar, Mengqi Lu, and Javier Moreno. Generalized quasi-topological gravities: the whole shebang.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 40:015004,

  10. [10]

    Cano and Angel Murcia

    Pablo A. Cano and Angel Murcia. Electromagnetic quasitopological gravities.JHEP, 10:125,

  11. [11]

    Bueno, P

    Pablo Bueno, Pablo A. Cano, Alvaro Ruip´ erez, and Victor A. Vilar. Regular black holes from pure gravity.Physics Letters B, 861:139260, 2025. arXiv:2403.04827

  12. [12]

    Borissova and R

    Johanna Borissova and Raul Carballo-Rubio. Regular black holes from pure gravity in four dimensions.arXiv preprint, 2026. arXiv:2602.16773

  13. [13]

    Borissova and J

    Johanna Borissova and Joao Magueijo. Modified friedmann equations and non-singular cosmologies ind= 4 non-polynomial quasi-topological gravities.arXiv preprint, 2026. arXiv:2603.17654

  14. [14]

    R. A. Konoplya. Quasinormal modes of four-dimensional regular black holes in quasi- topological gravity: Overtones’ outburst via WKB method.Phys. Lett. B, 876:140386, 2026. 10

  15. [15]

    Malik,Thermodynamic, Optical, and Orbital Signatures of Regular Asymptotically Flat Black Holes in Quasi-Topological Gravity,arXiv:2603.24212

    Zainab Malik. Thermodynamic, optical, and orbital signatures of regular asymptotically flat black holes in quasi-topological gravity.arXiv preprint, 2026. arXiv:2603.24212

  16. [16]

    Malik, Int

    Zainab Malik. Quasinormal modes of the bumblebee black holes with a global monopole.Int. J. Theor. Phys., 63:199, 2024. arXiv:2308.10412

  17. [17]

    Malik, Annals Phys

    Zainab Malik. Perturbations and quasinormal modes of the dirac field in effective quantum gravity.Annals Phys., 479:170046, 2025. arXiv:2409.01561

  18. [18]

    Malik, JCAP 04, 042 (2025), arXiv:2412.19443 [gr-qc]

    Zainab Malik. Correspondence between quasinormal modes and grey-body factors for massive fields in schwarzschild-de sitter spacetime.JCAP, 04:042, 2025. arXiv:2412.19443

  19. [19]

    Malik, Annals Phys

    Zainab Malik. Long-lived quasinormal modes of brane-localized reissner-nordstr¨ om–de sitter black holes.Annals Phys., 482:170238, 2025. arXiv:2504.12570

  20. [20]

    Analytic Expressions for Quasinormal Modes of a Regular Black Hole Sourced by a Dehnen-Type Halo.Int

    Zainab Malik. Analytic Expressions for Quasinormal Modes of a Regular Black Hole Sourced by a Dehnen-Type Halo.Int. J. Grav. Theor. Phys., 2(1):3, 2026

  21. [21]

    Quasinormal modes of Schwarzschild de Sitter black holes,

    A. Zhidenko. Quasi-normal modes of schwarzschild-de sitter black holes.Classical and Quan- tum Gravity, 21:273–280, 2004. arXiv:gr-qc/0307012

  22. [22]

    R. A. Konoplya. Quasinormal behavior of the d-dimensional schwarzschild black hole and higher order wkb approach.Physical Review D, 68:024018, 2003. arXiv:gr-qc/0303052

  23. [23]

    R. A. Konoplya, A. Zhidenko, and A. F. Zinhailo. Higher order wkb formula for quasinor- mal modes and grey-body factors: recipes for quick and accurate calculations.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 36:155002, 2019. arXiv:1904.10333

  24. [24]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko. Analytic expressions for quasinormal modes and grey-body factors in the eikonal limit and beyond.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 40:245005, 2023. arXiv:2309.02560

  25. [25]

    Scattering of a Scalar Field in the Four-Dimensional Quasi-Topological Gravity.Int

    Alexey Dubinsky. Scattering of a Scalar Field in the Four-Dimensional Quasi-Topological Gravity.Int. J. Grav. Theor. Phys., 2(1):6, 2026

  26. [26]

    M. S. Churilova, R. A. Konoplya, and A. Zhidenko. Analytic formula for quasinormal modes in the near-extreme kerr-newman-de sitter spacetime governed by a non-p¨ oschl-teller potential. Physical Review D, 105(8):084003, 2022. arXiv:2108.04858

  27. [27]

    R. A. Konoplya and Elcio Abdalla. Scalar field perturbations of the schwarzschild black hole in the g¨ odel universe.Physical Review D, 71:084015, 2005. arXiv:hep-th/0503029

  28. [28]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko. Eikonal instability of gauss-bonnet-(anti-)de sitter black holes.Physical Review D, 95:104005, 2017. arXiv:1701.01652

  29. [29]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko. The portrait of eikonal instability in lovelock theories. JCAP, 05:050, 2017. arXiv:1705.01656

  30. [30]

    R. A. Konoplya, A. F. Zinhailo, J. Kunz, Z. Stuchlik, and A. Zhidenko. Quasinormal ringing of regular black holes in asymptotically safe gravity: the importance of overtones.JCAP, 10:091,

  31. [31]

    arXiv:2206.14714. 11

  32. [32]

    Miranda, Emanuele Berti, Helvi Witek, and Vilson T

    Vitor Cardoso, Alex S. Miranda, Emanuele Berti, Helvi Witek, and Vilson T. Zanchin. Geodesic stability, lyapunov exponents and quasinormal modes.Physical Review D, 79:064016,

  33. [33]

    Stefanov, Stoytcho S

    Ivan Zh. Stefanov, Stoytcho S. Yazadjiev, and Galin G. Gyulchev. Connection between black- hole quasinormal modes and lensing in the strong deflection limit.Physical Review Letters, 104:251103, 2010

  34. [34]

    R. A. Konoplya and Z. Stuchl´ ık. Are eikonal quasinormal modes linked to the unstable circular null geodesics?Physics Letters B, 771:597–602, 2017. arXiv:1705.05928

  35. [35]

    R. A. Konoplya. Further clarification on quasinormal modes/circular null geodesics correspon- dence.Physics Letters B, page 137674, 2023. arXiv:2210.08373

  36. [36]

    S. V. Bolokhov. Black holes in starobinsky-bel-robinson gravity and the breakdown of quasinormal modes/null geodesics correspondence.Physics Letters B, 856:138879, 2024. arXiv:2310.12326

  37. [37]

    Viewing the Shadow of the Black Hole at the Galactic Center

    Heino Falcke, Fulvio Melia, and Eric Agol. Viewing the shadow of the black hole at the galactic center.The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 528:L13–L16, 2000. arXiv:astro-ph/9912263

  38. [38]

    Measurement of the Kerr Spin Parameter by Observation of a Compact Object's Shadow

    Ken Hioki and Kei-ichi Maeda. Measurement of the kerr spin parameter by observation of a compact object’s shadow.Physical Review D, 80:024042, 2009. arXiv:0904.3575

  39. [39]

    Testing the no-hair theorem with observations in the electromagnetic spectrum: Ii

    Tim Johannsen and Dimitrios Psaltis. Testing the no-hair theorem with observations in the electromagnetic spectrum: Ii. black-hole images.The Astrophysical Journal, 718:446–454,

  40. [40]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. The Shadow and Mass of the Central Black Hole

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration. First m87 event horizon telescope results. vi. the shadow and mass of the central black hole.The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 875:L6, 2019. arXiv:1906.11243

  41. [41]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko. Shadows of parametrized axially symmetric black holes allowing for separation of variables.Physical Review D, 103:104033, 2021. arXiv:2103.03855

  42. [42]

    Volker Perlick and Oleg Yu. Tsupko. Calculating black hole shadows: review of analytical studies.Physics Reports, 947:1–39, 2022. arXiv:2105.07101

  43. [43]

    Schutz and Clifford M

    Bernard F. Schutz and Clifford M. Will. Black hole normal modes: A semianalytic approach. Astrophysical Journal Letters, 291:L33–L36, 1985

  44. [44]

    Sai Iyer and Clifford M. Will. Black-hole normal modes: A wkb approach. i. foundations and application of a higher-order wkb analysis of potential-barrier scattering.Physical Review D, 35(12):3621–3631, 1987

  45. [45]

    Quasinormal modes of black holes

    Jerzy Matyjasek and Micha l Opala. Quasinormal modes of black holes. The improved semi- analytic approach.Phys. Rev. D, 96(2):024011, 2017

  46. [46]

    Konoplya, Jerzy Matyjasek, and Alexander Zhidenko

    Roman A. Konoplya, Jerzy Matyjasek, and Alexander Zhidenko. An efficient higher-order WKB code for quasinormal modes and greybody factors.Int. J. Grav. Theor. Phys., 2:5, 2026

  47. [47]

    Analytic Expressions for Quasinormal Modes of a Regular Black Hole Sourced by a Dehnen-Type Halo.Int

    Zainab Malik. Analytic Expressions for Quasinormal Modes of a Regular Black Hole Sourced by a Dehnen-Type Halo.Int. J. Grav. Theor. Phys., 2(1):3, 2026. 12

  48. [48]

    R. A. Konoplya. Quasinormal modes of the electrically charged dilaton black hole.Gen. Rel. Grav., 34:329–335, 2002

  49. [49]

    Scalar quasinormal modes of black holes in Einstein-Yang-Mills gravity.Phys

    Yang Guo and Yan-Gang Miao. Scalar quasinormal modes of black holes in Einstein-Yang-Mills gravity.Phys. Rev. D, 102(6):064049, 2020

  50. [50]

    K. D. Kokkotas, R. A. Konoplya, and A. Zhidenko. Quasinormal modes, scattering and Hawking radiation of Kerr-Newman black holes in a magnetic field.Phys. Rev. D, 83:024031, 2011

  51. [51]

    Abdalla, R

    E. Abdalla, R. A. Konoplya, and C. Molina. Scalar field evolution in Gauss-Bonnet black holes.Phys. Rev. D, 72:084006, 2005

  52. [52]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko. Holographic conductivity of zero temperature superconduc- tors.Phys. Lett. B, 686:199–206, 2010

  53. [53]

    Quasinormal Ringing and Unruh-Verlinde Temperature of the Frolov Black Hole.Int

    Akshat Pathrikar. Quasinormal Ringing and Unruh-Verlinde Temperature of the Frolov Black Hole.Int. J. Grav. Theor. Phys., 1(1):1, 2026

  54. [54]

    P. A. Gonz´ alez, Eleftherios Papantonopoulos,´Angel Rinc´ on, and Yerko V´ asquez. Quasinormal modes of massive scalar fields in four-dimensional wormholes: Anomalous decay rate.Phys. Rev. D, 106(2):024050, 2022

  55. [55]

    Grey-Body Factors for Scalar and Dirac Fields in the Euler-Heisenberg Elec- trodynamics.Int

    Zainab Malik. Grey-Body Factors for Scalar and Dirac Fields in the Euler-Heisenberg Elec- trodynamics.Int. J. Grav. Theor. Phys., 1(1):6, 2025

  56. [56]

    Quasinormal modes of dilaton-de Sitter black holes: scalar perturba- tions.Gen

    Sharmanthie Fernando. Quasinormal modes of dilaton-de Sitter black holes: scalar perturba- tions.Gen. Rel. Grav., 48(3):24, 2016

  57. [57]

    Stability and quasi- normal modes of black holes in conformal Weyl gravity.Phys

    Mehrab Momennia, Seyed Hossein Hendi, and Fatemeh Soltani Bidgoli. Stability and quasi- normal modes of black holes in conformal Weyl gravity.Phys. Lett. B, 813:136028, 2021

  58. [58]

    S. V. Bolokhov and Milena Skvortsova. Gravitational Quasinormal Modes and Grey-Body Factors of Bonanno–Reuter Regular Black Holes.Int. J. Grav. Theor. Phys., 1(1):3, 2025

  59. [59]

    Quasinormal modes of charged fields in Reissner- Nordstr¨ om backgrounds by Borel-Pad´ e summation of Bender-Wu series.Phys

    Dan Stefan Eniceicu and Matthew Reece. Quasinormal modes of charged fields in Reissner- Nordstr¨ om backgrounds by Borel-Pad´ e summation of Bender-Wu series.Phys. Rev. D, 102(4):044015, 2020

  60. [60]

    R. A. Konoplya and Elcio Abdalla. Scalar field perturbations of the Schwarzschild black hole in the Godel universe.Phys. Rev. D, 71:084015, 2005

  61. [61]

    Bolokhov, Kirill A

    Sergei V. Bolokhov, Kirill A. Bronnikov, and Milena V. Skvortsova. Stability Ranges of Magnetic Black Holes and Mirror (Topological) Stars in 5D Gravity.Int. J. Grav. Theor. Phys., 2(1):2, 2026

  62. [62]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko. High overtones of schwarzschild-de sitter quasinormal spec- trum.JHEP, 06:037, 2004. arXiv:hep-th/0402080

  63. [63]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko. Gravitational spectrum of black holes in the einstein-aether theory.Physics Letters B, 648:236–239, 2007. arXiv:hep-th/0611226

  64. [64]

    Quasinormal modes of black holes. The improved semianalytic approach

    Jerzy Matyjasek and Michal Opala. Quasinormal modes of black holes: The improved semi- analytic approach.Physical Review D, 96(2):024011, 2017. arXiv:1704.00361. 13

  65. [65]

    S. V. Bolokhov. Long-lived quasinormal modes and overtones’ behavior of holonomy-corrected black holes.Physical Review D, 110:024010, 2024. arXiv:2311.05503

  66. [66]

    S. V. Bolokhov. Late time decay of scalar and dirac fields around an asymptotically de sitter black hole in the euler–heisenberg electrodynamics.The European Physical Journal C, 84:634, 2024

  67. [67]

    S. V. Bolokhov. Long lived quasinormal modes in the effective quantum gravity.The European Physical Journal C, 85:1166, 2025

  68. [68]

    Quasinormal spectrum of (2+1)-dimensional asymptotically flat, ds and ads black holes.Fortschritte der Physik, 72:2400036, 2024

    Milena Skvortsova. Quasinormal spectrum of (2+1)-dimensional asymptotically flat, ds and ads black holes.Fortschritte der Physik, 72:2400036, 2024

  69. [69]

    Quasinormal frequencies of fields with various spin in the quantum oppenheimer–snyder model of black holes.Fortschritte der Physik, 72:2400132, 2024

    Milena Skvortsova. Quasinormal frequencies of fields with various spin in the quantum oppenheimer–snyder model of black holes.Fortschritte der Physik, 72:2400132, 2024

  70. [70]

    Skvortsova, EPL 149, 59001 (2025), arXiv:2503.03650 [gr-qc]

    Milena Skvortsova. Long-lived quasinormal modes of regular and extreme black holes.EPL (Europhysics Letters), 149:59001, 2025. arXiv:2503.03650

  71. [71]

    Quantum corrected black holes: testing the correspondence between grey- body factors and quasinormal modes.The European Physical Journal C, 85:854, 2025

    Milena Skvortsova. Quantum corrected black holes: testing the correspondence between grey- body factors and quasinormal modes.The European Physical Journal C, 85:854, 2025

  72. [72]

    B. C. L¨ utf¨ uo˘ glu. Long-lived quasinormal modes and gray-body factors of black holes and wormholes in dark matter inspired weyl gravity.The European Physical Journal C, 85:486, 2025

  73. [73]

    B. C. L¨ utf¨ uo˘ glu. Non-minimal einstein–yang–mills black holes: fundamental quasinormal mode and grey-body factors versus outburst of overtones.The European Physical Journal C, 85:630, 2025

  74. [74]

    Proper-time approach in asymptotic safety via black hole quasinormal modes and grey-body factors.The European Physical Journal C, 85:1190,

    Bekir Can L¨ utf¨ uo˘ glu, Erdin¸ c Ula¸ s Saka, Abubakir Shermatov, Javlon Rayimbaev, Inomjon Ibragimov, and Sokhibjan Muminov. Proper-time approach in asymptotic safety via black hole quasinormal modes and grey-body factors.The European Physical Journal C, 85:1190,

  75. [75]

    B. C. L¨ utf¨ uo˘ glu. Quasinormal modes and gray-body factors for gravitational perturbations in asymptotically safe gravity.The European Physical Journal C, 86:39, 2026

  76. [76]

    Gravitational lensing in the strong field limit.Physical Review D, 66:103001,

    Valerio Bozza. Gravitational lensing in the strong field limit.Physical Review D, 66:103001,

  77. [77]

    R. A. Konoplya and O. S. Stashko. Transition from regular black holes to wormholes in covariant effective quantum gravity: Scattering, quasinormal modes, and hawking radiation. Physical Review D, 111:084031, 2025. arXiv:2502.05689

  78. [78]

    Quasinormal modes-shadow correspondence for rotating regular black holes.Physical Review D, 110:084075, 2024

    Davide Pedrotti and Sunny Vagnozzi. Quasinormal modes-shadow correspondence for rotating regular black holes.Physical Review D, 110:084075, 2024. arXiv:2404.07589. 14