pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.13708 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-15 · 📡 eess.SY · cs.SY

Homotopy-Guided Potential Games for Congestion-Aware Navigation

Mohammed Irshadh Ismaaeel Sathyamangalam Imran , Lasse Peters , Michael Khayyat , Stefano Arrigoni , Francesco Braghin , Laura Ferranti This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 12:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SY cs.SY
keywords multi-agent motion planninghomotopy classespotential gamescongestion-aware navigationopen-loop Nash equilibriumreceding-horizon controltopological path planning
0
0 comments X

The pith

Homotopy classes as strategy sets in potential games let agents avoid congested equilibria in multi-agent navigation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents a method that combines topological path planning with game-theoretic optimization to handle interactions and congestion among multiple agents moving toward goals. Standard game planners often settle into crowded solutions because they lack ways to consider alternate route topologies, while pure homotopy methods ignore how agents' choices depend on each other. The approach generates distinct homotopy classes of paths for each agent at every planning step, applies a quick filter to keep only the top-K congestion-free joint combinations, and then solves a potential game over those candidates to produce a consistent open-loop Nash equilibrium with penalties for sudden changes. Simulations with three agents show shorter completion times and larger safety clearances than baselines that ignore topology. Hardware tests with two robots and one human confirm the system can switch to alternate feasible paths when a person behaves unpredictably, where simpler games get stuck.

Core claim

Homotopy classes serve as structured strategy sets inside a receding-horizon potential game: a deterministic planner produces topologically distinct paths conditioned on the current joint state, a heuristic retains the top-K most suitable congestion-free joint strategies, and the game then computes a generalized open-loop Nash equilibrium that respects homotopy consistency and adds costs for abrupt strategy switches between horizons.

What carries the argument

Homotopy-guided potential game, in which homotopy classes act as the discrete strategy sets for the game after heuristic top-K filtering.

If this is right

  • Three-agent simulations reach goals faster with larger minimum distances between agents than either a local planner or NH-ORCA.
  • The filtered homotopy sets remain small enough for real-time receding-horizon solution while still capturing alternate routes around congestion.
  • Hardware experiments with two robots and one human show the planner switches to feasible alternate equilibria when the human acts irrationally, whereas the baseline game without homotopies fails to adapt.
  • Penalties on strategy changes between horizons keep the sequence of equilibria temporally consistent without sacrificing safety or efficiency.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the top-K filter reliably preserves near-optimal equilibria, the same structure could scale to modestly larger agent teams without exponential growth in computation.
  • The method's ability to maintain multiple topological options may prove useful in environments with moving obstacles whose future paths are uncertain.
  • Because the game is formulated over homotopy classes rather than continuous trajectories, it might combine with sampling-based planners that already enumerate homotopy classes.

Load-bearing premise

The heuristic that selects only a top-K subset of congestion-free joint strategies never excludes a better equilibrium or introduces bias into the subsequent game computation.

What would settle it

A simulation or hardware trial in which the top-K filter removes the globally best non-congested joint strategy that the full set of homotopies would have found, or a case where the method fails to switch equilibria when a human deviates from rational play.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.13708 by Francesco Braghin, Lasse Peters, Laura Ferranti, Michael Khayyat, Mohammed Irshadh Ismaaeel Sathyamangalam Imran, Stefano Arrigoni.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Overview of the proposed 3-agent game framework. (a) Starting from a joint initial configuration with agent goals (G), (b) a homotopy planner generates topologically distinct paths using deterministic node sampling. Retained paths (solid) form valid joint homotopy sets Πvalid, while others (dotted) are filtered out. (c) A heuristic prefilter selects the top-K congestion-free combinations Πtop, one of which… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: An example of fixed-end homotopes that could be generated for the yellow agent around the blue agent to reach a designated goal (Purple). strategies from distinct homotopy classes, enabling both strategic coordination and topological path diversity. 2) Heuristic Prefiltering: We design a lightweight pre￾filtering step that discards unsafe or congested joint homotopy combinations, ensuring tractable compu￾t… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Schematic illustration of graph construction for the yellow agent (i = 1) towards its Goal G by the homotopy planner with respect to other agents i = 2, 3, 4 represented by red, blue and green respectively: (a) node placement, (b) edge validation with node adjustment (Q13,alt,R), (c) graph construction, (d) pruning redundant paths within same homotopy class, (e) final set of topologically distinct homotopy… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Ranking comparison between two homotopy combinations, with agents assigned as follows: blue: Agent 1, violet: Agent 2, yellow: Agent 3, red: Agent 4, and green: Agent 5. Symbols along each path indicate predicted positions at s = 20 steps, shown for illustration. Joint paths from homotopy planner highlight congestion near predicted positions. (a) Best homotopy combination (lowest score): agents are well-se… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Schematic illustration of the homotopy-enforcing constraint, a technique adapted from [30], for Agent i (purple) influenced by Agent j (blue). “S” and “G” denote start and goal positions. Solid lines represent homotopy reference paths, while circles with increasing opacity indicate the expected agent positions along these paths, spaced by arc length according to their reference velocities. Dashed lines sho… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Experiment 1: Number of top-K combinations required to capture the best cost. (a) 3-player scenario, (b) 4-player scenario, (c) 5-player scenario. filter was disabled, and (6) was solved in open loop for 4 s (40 steps) over all homotopy combinations. For each trial, the minimum-cost combination was identified, and its rank within the prefilter’s list was recorded [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Comparison between homotopy-assisted, baseline potential game formulations, and NH-ORCA over 100 evaluated scenarios with agents R1, R2, and R3. (a) Robot trajectories for the representative sample scenario under rational agent setting; (b) Robot trajectories for the representative sample scenario under irrational agent TABLE I Quantitative evaluation of navigation performance and comparative outcomes acro… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Hardware validation results for our approach and the baseline game under rational and irrational settings for a three-player game (Agents R1, R2, R3), shown in light blue, light pink, and red. S and G represent Start and Goal respectively. (a) Rational scenario under the proposed approach, with the corresponding simulation output superimposed for comparative analysis(see video (V1)). (b) Rational scenario … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We address the multi-agent motion planning problem where interactions, collisions, and congestion co-exist. Conventional game-theoretic planners capture interactions among agents but often converge to conservative, congested equilibria. Homotopy planners, on the other hand, can explore topologically distinct paths, but lack mechanisms to account for the interdependence of agents' future actions. We propose a unified framework that leverages homotopy classes as structured strategy sets within a receding-horizon setup. At each planning stage, a deterministic homotopy planner generates topologically distinct paths for each agent, conditioned on the joint configuration. To avoid intractable growth of candidate paths, we propose a simple heuristic filtering step that selects a top-$K$ subset of the most suitable congestion-free joint strategies to ensure computational tractability. These serve as initializations for a potential game that enforces homotopy-consistent constraints and yields a generalized open-loop Nash equilibrium (OLNE), with penalties discouraging abrupt strategy shifts in a receding-horizon setting. Simulations with three agents demonstrate improved efficiency (faster completion) and enhanced safety (greater inter-agent clearance, leading to reduced congestion) compared to a local baseline and NH-ORCA that do not reason about homotopies. Hardware trials with two robots and one human demonstrate robustness to irrational behaviors, where our method adapts by switching to alternative feasible equilibria while the baseline game fails.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a unified framework for multi-agent motion planning that integrates homotopy classes as structured strategy sets into a potential game within a receding-horizon setup. A deterministic homotopy planner generates topologically distinct paths conditioned on joint configurations; a heuristic filters these to a top-K subset of congestion-free joint strategies for tractability; these initialize a potential game yielding a homotopy-consistent generalized open-loop Nash equilibrium (OLNE) with penalties for abrupt shifts. Simulations with three agents and hardware trials with two robots plus one human are reported to show faster completion times and greater inter-agent clearance compared to a local baseline and NH-ORCA.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work could meaningfully advance congestion-aware navigation by combining topological exploration with game-theoretic equilibrium selection, addressing limitations of pure homotopy or game-theoretic planners. The constructive use of established homotopy computation and potential-game equilibria is a strength, as is the hardware demonstration of robustness to irrational human behavior. The result would be more impactful with stronger validation that the heuristic does not bias outcomes.

major comments (1)
  1. The central claim—that homotopy-guided potential games yield faster completion and greater inter-agent clearance than non-homotopy baselines—depends on the filtered top-K subset containing equilibria at least as good as those reachable without filtering. The abstract and method describe a 'simple heuristic filtering step' that selects 'the most suitable congestion-free joint strategies' before the potential game computes the OLNE, but no analysis, completeness guarantees, or sensitivity study is provided on whether the heuristic (e.g., via its congestion metric or ranking) systematically excludes superior homotopy combinations. This is load-bearing, as early filtering choices propagate in the receding-horizon loop and could make reported gains artifacts of the selection rule rather than the homotopy-potential-game construction.
minor comments (2)
  1. Abstract: the reported positive outcomes in simulations and hardware trials are stated without quantitative metrics (e.g., specific completion times, clearance distances), error analysis, statistical details, or full experimental setup, which weakens the ability to assess the magnitude and reliability of the improvements.
  2. Notation and presentation: the term 'generalized open-loop Nash equilibrium (OLNE)' is introduced without a clear definition or reference to its precise formulation relative to standard OLNE; adding an equation or short derivation would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive review and for noting the framework's potential to advance congestion-aware navigation through the integration of homotopy classes and potential games, as well as the hardware demonstration. We address the major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate additional analysis.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim—that homotopy-guided potential games yield faster completion and greater inter-agent clearance than non-homotopy baselines—depends on the filtered top-K subset containing equilibria at least as good as those reachable without filtering. The abstract and method describe a 'simple heuristic filtering step' that selects 'the most suitable congestion-free joint strategies' before the potential game computes the OLNE, but no analysis, completeness guarantees, or sensitivity study is provided on whether the heuristic (e.g., via its congestion metric or ranking) systematically excludes superior homotopy combinations. This is load-bearing, as early filtering choices propagate in the receding-horizon loop and could make reported gains artifacts of the selection rule rather than the homotopy-potential-game construction.

    Authors: We agree that the absence of analysis or sensitivity study on the heuristic filtering step is a limitation of the current manuscript. The heuristic is presented as a practical mechanism to ensure tractability by retaining only congestion-free joint strategies from the combinatorially large set generated by the deterministic homotopy planner; it does not claim to preserve all globally optimal combinations. The potential game then optimizes within this reduced set, and the receding-horizon replanning provides opportunities to recover from suboptimal early choices. Nevertheless, without explicit validation, it remains possible that the reported gains partly reflect the specific filtering rule. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection containing a sensitivity study on the choice of K and the congestion-ranking metric, together with an explicit discussion of the heuristic's design rationale and its limitations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the derivation chain

full rationale

The paper describes a constructive pipeline: deterministic homotopy generation of topologically distinct paths, followed by a heuristic top-K filter for tractability, then a potential game to compute OLNE equilibria with homotopy constraints and receding-horizon penalties. These steps rely on established external techniques for homotopy classes and potential games rather than defining outcomes in terms of themselves or fitting parameters to the target metrics. No equations or claims reduce a prediction to its inputs by construction, and the reported simulation/hardware gains are presented as empirical comparisons against non-homotopy baselines. The framework remains self-contained against external benchmarks without load-bearing self-citations or self-definitional loops.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract, the framework relies on standard domain assumptions from motion planning and game theory with one heuristic parameter; no new entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • K
    The number of top joint strategies retained after heuristic filtering to maintain tractability; value not specified in abstract.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Deterministic computation of topologically distinct paths is possible from joint agent configurations.
    Invoked in the homotopy planner component at each receding-horizon stage.
  • domain assumption A potential game can be formulated to produce a generalized open-loop Nash equilibrium under homotopy-consistent constraints.
    Central to the game-theoretic resolution step.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5562 in / 1586 out tokens · 64998 ms · 2026-05-10T12:59:04.330338+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Optimal reciprocal collision avoidance for multiple non-holonomic robots,

    J. Alonso-Mora, A. Breitenmoser, M. Rufli, P. A. Beardsley, and R. Y. Siegwart, “Optimal reciprocal collision avoidance for multiple non-holonomic robots,” in International Symposium on Distributed Autonomous Robotic Systems, 2010

    work page 2010

  2. [2]

    A distributed multi-vehicle coordination algorithm for naviga- tion in tight environments,

    R. Firoozi, L. Ferranti, X. Zhang, S. Nejadnik, and F. Borrelli, “A distributed multi-vehicle coordination algorithm for naviga- tion in tight environments,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2024

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    Social lstm: Human trajectory prediction in crowded spaces,

    A. Alahi, K. Goel, V. Ramanathan, A. Robicquet, L. Fei-Fei, and S. Savarese, “Social lstm: Human trajectory prediction in crowded spaces,” in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2016, pp. 961–971

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    Inference-based strategy alignment for general-sum differential games,

    L. Peters, D. Fridovich-Keil, C. J. Tomlin, and Z. Sunberg, “Inference-based strategy alignment for general-sum differential games,” in Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 2020

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    Başar and G

    T. Başar and G. J. Olsder, Dynamic noncooperative game theory. SIAM, 1998. 9 Simulation Result (Solid Line) (a) (b) Simulation Result (Solid Line) (c) (d) Fig. 8. Hardware validation results for our approach and the baseline game under rational and irrational settings for a three-player game (Agents R1, R2, R3), shown in light blue, light pink, and red. S...

    work page 1998

  6. [6]

    Game theoretic motion planning for multi-robot racing,

    Z. Wang, R. Spica, and M. Schwager, “Game theoretic motion planning for multi-robot racing,” in Distributed Autonomous Robotic Systems: The 14th International Symposium. Springer, 2019, pp. 225–238

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Hierarchical game-theoretic planning for autonomous vehicles,

    J. F. Fisac, E. Bronstein, E. Stefansson, D. Sadigh, S. S. Sastry, and A. D. Dragan, “Hierarchical game-theoretic planning for autonomous vehicles,” in 2019 International conference on robotics and automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2019, pp. 9590–9596

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    On the stackelberg strategy in nonzerosum games,

    M. Simaan and J. B. Cruz, “On the stackelberg strategy in nonzerosum games,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 533–555, 1973

    work page 1973

  9. [9]

    Leyton-Brown and Y

    K. Leyton-Brown and Y. Shoham, Essentials of game theory: A concise multidisciplinary introduction. Springer Nature, 2022

    work page 2022

  10. [10]

    Generalized Nash equilibrium Problems,

    F. Facchinei and C. Kanzow, “Generalized Nash equilibrium Problems,” Annals of Operations Research, vol. 175, no. 1, pp. 177–211, 2010

    work page 2010

  11. [11]

    Potential games,

    D. Monderer and L. S. Shapley, “Potential games,” Games and economic behavior, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 124–143, 1996

    work page 1996

  12. [12]

    New complexity results about nash equilibria,

    V. Conitzer and T. Sandholm, “New complexity results about nash equilibria,” Games and Economic Behavior, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 621–641, 2008

    work page 2008

  13. [13]

    Cost inference for feedback dynamic games from noisy partial state observations and incomplete trajec- tories,

    J. Li, C.-Y. Chiu, L. Peters, S. Sojoudi, C. J. Tomlin, and D. Fridovich-Keil, “Cost inference for feedback dynamic games from noisy partial state observations and incomplete trajec- tories,” in Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems (AAMAS). IF AAMAS, 2023, pp. 1062–1070

    work page 2023

  14. [14]

    Factorization of Dynamic Games over Spatio-Temporal Resources,

    A. Zanardi, S. Bolognani, A. Censi, F. Dorfler, and E. Fraz- zoli, “Factorization of Dynamic Games over Spatio-Temporal Resources,” in 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on 10 Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2022, pp. 13 159–13 166

    work page 2022

  15. [15]

    Winding through: Crowd navigation via topological invariance,

    C. Mavrogiannis, K. Balasubramanian, S. Poddar, A. Gandra, and S. S. Srinivasa, “Winding through: Crowd navigation via topological invariance,” IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 121–128, 2022

    work page 2022

  16. [16]

    Data-driven topological motion planning with persistent cohomology

    F. T. Pokorny and D. Kragic, “Data-driven topological motion planning with persistent cohomology. ” in Robotics: Science and Systems, 2015

    work page 2015

  17. [17]

    Interactive joint planning for autonomous vehicles,

    Y. Chen, S. Veer, P. Karkus, and M. Pavone, “Interactive joint planning for autonomous vehicles,” IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett., 2023

    work page 2023

  18. [18]

    Topological constraints in search-based robot path planning,

    S. Bhattacharya, M. Likhachev, and V. Kumar, “Topological constraints in search-based robot path planning,” Autonomous Robots, vol. 33, pp. 273–290, 2012

    work page 2012

  19. [19]

    Topological invariants in braid theory,

    M. A. Berger, “Topological invariants in braid theory,” Letters in Mathematical Physics, vol. 55, pp. 181–192, 2001

    work page 2001

  20. [20]

    Decentralized multi- agent navigation planning with braids,

    C. I. Mavrogiannis and R. A. Knepper, “Decentralized multi- agent navigation planning with braids,” in Algorithmic Foun- dations of Robotics XII: Proceedings of the Twelfth Workshop on the Algorithmic Foundations of Robotics. Springer, 2020, pp. 880–895

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    A distributed protocol for motion coordination in free-range vehicular systems,

    E. Roszkowska and S. A. Reveliotis, “A distributed protocol for motion coordination in free-range vehicular systems,” IF AC Proceedings Volumes, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 9530–9536, 2011

    work page 2011

  22. [22]

    Global tra- jectory optimization for autonomous driving using nonlinear programming with topology classes,

    M. Nezami, N. T. Nguyen, and G. Schildbach, “Global tra- jectory optimization for autonomous driving using nonlinear programming with topology classes,” in 2024 IEEE 20th Inter- national Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE). IEEE, 2024, pp. 2237–2242

    work page 2024

  23. [23]

    Tac- tical game-theoretic decision-making with homotopy class con- straints,

    M. Khayyat, A. Zanardi, S. Arrigoni, and F. Braghin, “Tac- tical game-theoretic decision-making with homotopy class con- straints,” IEEE Trans. Intell. Veh., vol. 10, pp. 3916–3930, 2024

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    Algorithms for generalized potential games with mixed-integer variables,

    S. Sagratella, “Algorithms for generalized potential games with mixed-integer variables,” Computational Optimization and Ap- plications, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 689–717, 2017

    work page 2017

  25. [25]

    Refinements of nash equilibrium in potential games,

    O. Carbonell-Nicolau and R. P. McLean, “Refinements of nash equilibrium in potential games,” Theoretical Economics, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 555–582, 2014

    work page 2014

  26. [26]

    Local non-cooperative games with principled player selection for scalable motion planning,

    M. Chahine, R. Firoozi, W. Xiao, M. Schwager, and D. Rus, “Local non-cooperative games with principled player selection for scalable motion planning,” in 2023 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2023, pp. 880–887

    work page 2023

  27. [27]

    Prob- abilistic roadmaps for path planning in high-dimensional con- figuration spaces,

    L. Kavraki, P. Svestka, J. Latombe, and M. Overmars, “Prob- abilistic roadmaps for path planning in high-dimensional con- figuration spaces,” IEEE J. Robot. Autom., vol. 12, pp. 566 – 580, 09 1996

    work page 1996

  28. [28]

    Sampling-based algorithms for op- timal motion planning,

    S. Karaman and E. Frazzoli, “Sampling-based algorithms for op- timal motion planning,” The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 846–894, 2011

    work page 2011

  29. [29]

    Janson, B

    L. Janson, B. Ichter, and M. Pavone, Deterministic Sampling- Based Motion Planning: Optimality, Complexity, and Perfor- mance. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018, pp. 507–525

    work page 2018

  30. [30]

    Topology-driven parallel trajectory optimization in dynamic environments,

    O. De Groot, L. Ferranti, D. M. Gavrila, and J. Alonso-Mora, “Topology-driven parallel trajectory optimization in dynamic environments,” IEEE Trans. Robot., 2024

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    acados – a modular open-source framework for fast embedded optimal control,

    R. Verschueren, G. Frison, D. Kouzoupis, J. Frey, N. van Duijkeren, A. Zanelli, B. Novoselnik, T. Albin, R. Quirynen, and M. Diehl, “acados – a modular open-source framework for fast embedded optimal control,” Mathematical Programming Computation, 2021

    work page 2021