pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.13865 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-15 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Recognition: unknown

Witnessing the onset of stellar winds in Super-Luminous Supernova Hosts: implications for star-formation-driven outflows in low and high-redshift galaxies

A. Saldana-Lopez (SU) , A. Gkini (SU) , M. J. Hayes (SU) , R. Lunnan (SU) , C. A. Carr , M. Huberty , C. Scarlata , S. Schulze
show 1 more author
J. Sollerman
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 12:44 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords superluminous supernovaestellar windsgalactic outflowsstar formation feedbacklow-mass galaxiesMg II absorptionearly feedback phasesmass-loading factors
0
0 comments X

The pith

Outflows in superluminous supernova host galaxies originate from stellar winds prior to supernova feedback.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper presents VLT/X-shooter spectroscopy of six Type I superluminous supernova hosts at z=0.15-0.51, using the bright SLSN continua to probe the interstellar medium. All hosts show narrow blueshifted Mg II 2796,2803 absorption, indicating outflows with maximum velocities of 37-104 km/s that fall below empirical vmax-SFR relations for similar star-forming galaxies. Given the short lifetimes of SLSN massive progenitors, these outflows must arise from preceding stellar wind episodes rather than the supernovae themselves. Assuming constant velocity over 3 Myr and spherical symmetry, the authors derive wind masses of (0.02-1.0)×10^6 solar masses and outflow rates of 0.01-0.33 solar masses per year, yielding mass-loading factors below 1. The results show that stellar winds and radiation pressure alone drive slow, weak outflows during the first few million years of a starburst in low-mass systems, before supernova feedback dominates.

Core claim

All six SLSN-I host galaxies exhibit narrow blueshifted Mg II absorption with vmax=37-104 km/s, placing them below vmax-SFR relations for more evolved galaxies. Given the short lifetimes of the SLSN massive progenitors, these outflows originate from preceding stellar wind episodes. Voigt modeling under the assumption of constant-velocity outflow over 3 Myr and spherical symmetry yields wind masses M_wind=(0.02-1.0)×10^6 Msun and mass-outflow rates 0.01-0.33 Msun yr^{-1} with eta<1. This indicates that during the first few Myr of a burst, stellar winds and radiation pressure alone drive slow and weak outflows in low-mass systems prior to dominant supernova feedback.

What carries the argument

Blueshifted Mg II 2796,2803 absorption lines as down-the-barrel probes of low-ionization outflows, timed against the brief lifetimes of SLSN progenitors to isolate the pre-supernova wind phase.

If this is right

  • Stellar winds and radiation pressure initiate galactic feedback in low-mass systems before supernovae become dominant.
  • Mass-loading factors remain below unity during the earliest phases of star-formation bursts.
  • Outflow velocities in young low-mass galaxies lie below the empirical vmax-SFR relations calibrated on older systems.
  • Time-dependent implementations of stellar feedback are required in galaxy formation simulations to capture this early wind-driven phase.
  • These constraints apply directly to the star-formation-driven outflows expected in low-mass galaxies at high redshift.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • High-redshift galaxies with young stellar populations may commonly exhibit similarly slow and weak outflows that are currently under-detected.
  • Simulations that delay all feedback until the supernova stage could overestimate early gas retention in low-mass halos.
  • Targeted spectroscopy of even younger starburst regions without SLSNe could test whether wind-driven outflows appear before the first supernovae explode.

Load-bearing premise

The outflow is assumed to maintain constant velocity over 3 Myr and to expand in spherical symmetry when converting observed absorption into total wind mass and mass-outflow rate.

What would settle it

Finding outflow velocities or derived mass-loading factors in these hosts that exceed the range expected from stellar winds alone, or detecting identical absorption features in low-mass galaxies lacking recent massive star formation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.13865 by A. Gkini (SU), A. Saldana-Lopez (SU), C. A. Carr, C. Scarlata, J. Sollerman, M. Huberty, M. J. Hayes (SU), R. Lunnan (SU), S. Schulze.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Mechanical energy (Emech) over time, for a 106M⊙ instantaneous-burst stellar population (Lei￾therer et al. 1999, 2014), at both solar (blue) and sub-solar metallicities (black). The dashed and dotted lines represent the contribution of SNe and stellar winds (and radiation pres￾sure) to the total deposited energy, respectively. Highlighted in shaded gray is the time span where the energy output is dominated… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Example of VLT/XShooter rest-frame optical spectrum of one of our SLSN host systems [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: SLSN and host galaxy properties. The up￾per histogram shows the g-band absolute magnitude distri￾bution of the SLSNe-I sample by Chen et al. (2023), mea￾sured at the peak luminosity of the light curves. The bottom histogram depicts the distribution in SFR of the SLSNe-I host sample by Schulze et al. (2018). Downward arrows mark the SLSNe M peak g and host’s SFR values in this work. absorption lines as aris… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Examples of Voigt profile fitting of the Mg [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Outflow scaling relation between the maximum wind velocity ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: compares the Mg ii λ2796 profiles of two rep￾resentative SLSN hosts with the C ii λ13344 absorption profiles from these stacks. For SN 2020zbf, which is rep￾resentative of most objects in our sample, the velocity at maximum absorption (vout) is roughly consistent with the ones of the youngest age (≃ 2.5 Myr) and lowest SFR bins (≃ 0.1 M⊙yr−1 ) of the stacks. However, while the SLSN-host profiles are charac… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Energetics of outflows in SLSN host galax [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: VLT/XShooter rest-optical spectra for the remaining SLSNe host galaxies in this work. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Continue. REFERENCES Angus, C. R., Smith, M., Sullivan, M., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 487, 2215, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1321 Arribas, S., Colina, L., Bellocchi, E., Maiolino, R., & Villar-Mart´ın, M. 2014, A&A, 568, A14, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201323324 Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, A. J., & Scott, P. 2009, ARA&A, 47, 481, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145222 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., … view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Voigt profile fitting of the Mg ii doublet in the remaining SLSNe host spectra of this work. Legend is the same as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Direct observational constraints on the earliest, stellar-wind-dominated phases of galactic outflows remain scarce. We present medium-resolution VLT/X-shooter spectroscopy of six Type I superluminous supernova (SLSN-I) host galaxies at z = 0.15-0.51, exploiting the bright SLSN continua as single, down-the-barrel probes of the host interstellar medium. From nebular emission lines we derive dust-corrected star-formation rates as low as 0.06-0.44 Msun yr$^{-1}$, and gas-phase metallicities in the extremely metal-poor regime (less than nine percent solar). Moreover, all hosts exhibit narrow, blueshifted Mg II 2796, 2803 absorption, indicative of the presence of low-ionization outflows along the line of sight. Voigt modeling of the Mg II absorption yields maximum outflow velocities of $v_{max}$ = 37-104 km s$^{-1}$, placing these galaxies systematically below the empirical $v_{max}$-SFR relations for more evolved galaxies of similar SFR. Given the short lifetimes of the SLSN massive progenitors, we argue that these outflows must originate from preceding stellar wind episodes. Assuming a constant-velocity outflow over 3 Myr and spherical symmetry, we infer wind masses M$_{wind}$ = (0.02-1.0) $\times 10^6$ Msun and mass-outflow rates $\dot{M}_{wind} = 0.01-0.33$ Msun yr$^{-1}$, corresponding to mass-loading factors $\eta<1$. These results indicate that, during the first few Myr of a burst, stellar winds and radiation pressure alone drive slow and weak outflows in low-mass systems, prior to the onset of dominant supernova feedback. Our work provides one of the first empirical constraints on early feedback phases relevant for high-redshift galaxies, and for time-dependent implementations of stellar feedback in galaxy formation simulations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents VLT/X-shooter medium-resolution spectroscopy of six Type I superluminous supernova (SLSN-I) host galaxies at z=0.15-0.51. Using the SLSN continua as background probes, it derives dust-corrected SFRs of 0.06-0.44 M⊙ yr⁻¹ and gas-phase metallicities <9% solar from nebular emission lines. All hosts exhibit narrow blueshifted Mg II 2796,2803 absorption with v_max=37-104 km s⁻¹, below empirical v_max-SFR relations. Attributing the outflows to stellar winds (due to short SLSN progenitor lifetimes), and assuming constant-velocity outflow over 3 Myr with spherical symmetry, the authors infer M_wind=(0.02-1.0)×10^6 M⊙, Ṁ_wind=0.01-0.33 M⊙ yr⁻¹ and mass-loading factors η<1, concluding that stellar winds and radiation pressure drive slow, weak outflows in low-mass systems prior to dominant supernova feedback.

Significance. If the attribution to pre-supernova stellar winds and the derived η<1 hold after testing the underlying assumptions, the work supplies one of the first direct empirical constraints on the earliest, wind-dominated phase of galactic outflows in low-mass, low-metallicity galaxies. This is valuable for calibrating time-dependent stellar feedback prescriptions in galaxy-formation simulations and for interpreting outflow observations at high redshift where similar conditions are expected.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4] §4 (outflow mass estimation): The conversion of observed v_max into M_wind=(0.02-1.0)×10^6 M⊙ and Ṁ_wind=0.01-0.33 M⊙ yr⁻¹ (and thus η<1) rests on the explicit assumptions of constant velocity persisting for exactly 3 Myr and spherical symmetry. These parameters are not independently constrained by the X-shooter spectra, the low-SFR host properties, or any additional data; low-mass galaxies frequently show clumpy or biconical geometries and time-variable velocities. If the actual covering fraction, duration, or velocity law differs, the inferred mass-loading factor can shift above or below unity, removing the claimed distinction from later supernova-driven feedback.
  2. [§3.1-3.2] §3.1-3.2 (sample and modeling): The manuscript provides no quantitative test of alternative explanations (e.g., possible contribution from very recent supernova activity or AGN) nor a full error budget that propagates uncertainties from Voigt-profile fitting, dust corrections, and the 3 Myr assumption into the final η values. Without these, the significance of the v_max lying below the empirical relations and the robustness of η<1 remain difficult to assess.
minor comments (2)
  1. The exact numerical metallicities and the method used to derive the <9% solar values should be stated explicitly in the text rather than only in the abstract.
  2. Figure captions for the absorption-line fits should include the best-fit Voigt parameters and reduced χ² values for each object to allow readers to judge fit quality.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and insightful comments, which have helped us identify areas where the presentation of assumptions and robustness checks can be strengthened. We agree that additional discussion of systematic uncertainties and alternative explanations will improve the manuscript. Below we respond point by point to the major comments.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4] §4 (outflow mass estimation): The conversion of observed v_max into M_wind=(0.02-1.0)×10^6 M⊙ and Ṁ_wind=0.01-0.33 M⊙ yr⁻¹ (and thus η<1) rests on the explicit assumptions of constant velocity persisting for exactly 3 Myr and spherical symmetry. These parameters are not independently constrained by the X-shooter spectra, the low-SFR host properties, or any additional data; low-mass galaxies frequently show clumpy or biconical geometries and time-variable velocities. If the actual covering fraction, duration, or velocity law differs, the inferred mass-loading factor can shift above or below unity, removing the claimed distinction from later supernova-driven feedback.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the derived M_wind, Ṁ_wind and η values rely on the stated assumptions of constant velocity over 3 Myr and spherical symmetry, which are not directly measured from the single-line-of-sight spectra. These choices are physically motivated by the short lifetimes of SLSN progenitors (implying the observed outflows predate any supernova activity) and by the lack of spatial resolution in the data. We agree that a more thorough exploration of uncertainties is warranted. In the revised manuscript we will expand §4 with a dedicated subsection quantifying the impact of plausible variations in covering fraction (0.1–1), outflow duration (1–5 Myr), and velocity laws (constant vs. accelerating) on the inferred η, using the observed v_max as anchor. We will show that η remains below unity for the majority of reasonable parameter combinations, thereby preserving the distinction from later supernova-driven phases. A full systematic error budget will be incorporated. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [§3.1-3.2] §3.1-3.2 (sample and modeling): The manuscript provides no quantitative test of alternative explanations (e.g., possible contribution from very recent supernova activity or AGN) nor a full error budget that propagates uncertainties from Voigt-profile fitting, dust corrections, and the 3 Myr assumption into the final η values. Without these, the significance of the v_max lying below the empirical relations and the robustness of η<1 remain difficult to assess.

    Authors: We will add the requested quantitative tests and error analysis. For recent supernova activity, the presence of an SLSN itself requires that at least one very massive star has not yet exploded; combined with the narrow, low-velocity Mg II absorption and the absence of broad supernova features or high-velocity ejecta signatures in the spectra, this makes a dominant supernova-driven origin unlikely. For AGN, the hosts are low-mass, extremely metal-poor systems with no detectable high-ionization lines (e.g., [Ne V] λ3426) or X-ray counterparts. In the revision we will include a new paragraph in §3.2 with these limits and a simple Monte Carlo error propagation that folds in Voigt-profile uncertainties on column density and velocity, dust-correction errors from the Balmer decrement, and the 3 Myr timescale uncertainty into the final distributions of M_wind, Ṁ_wind and η. This will allow readers to assess the robustness of η<1 directly. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; inferences use explicit assumptions on unmeasured quantities

full rationale

The derivation measures v_max directly from Voigt-profile fits to observed Mg II absorption, then applies an explicit assumption of constant velocity persisting for exactly 3 Myr plus spherical symmetry to compute M_wind and eta. This is a standard model-dependent inference, not a reduction by construction or self-definition. Attribution of the outflows to stellar winds rests on external progenitor lifetime arguments rather than any fitted parameter or self-citation chain. No load-bearing self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes imported from prior author work appear in the provided text. The paper remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central inferences rest on one explicit time-scale assumption and a geometric assumption; no new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • outflow duration = 3 Myr
    Constant-velocity outflow assumed to have persisted for 3 Myr to convert velocity into mass and rate.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption spherical symmetry of the outflow
    Invoked to convert observed line-of-sight velocities and column densities into total wind mass.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5720 in / 1310 out tokens · 41525 ms · 2026-05-10T12:44:59.895722+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

122 extracted references · 119 canonical work pages · 6 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    R., Smith , M., Sullivan , M., et al

    Angus , C. R., Smith , M., Sullivan , M., et al. 2019, , 487, 2215, 10.1093/mnras/stz1321

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1321 2019

  2. [2]

    , keywords =

    Arribas , S., Colina , L., Bellocchi , E., Maiolino , R., & Villar-Mart \' n , M. 2014, , 568, A14, 10.1051/0004-6361/201323324

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201323324 2014

  3. [3]

    J., & Scott, P

    Asplund , M., Grevesse , N., Sauval , A. J., & Scott , P. 2009, , 47, 481, 10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145222

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145222 2009

  4. [4]

    P., Tollerud, E

    Astropy Collaboration , Robitaille , T. P., Tollerud , E. J., et al. 2013, , 558, A33, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 2013

  5. [5]

    The Astronomical Journal , author =

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Sip o cz , B. M., et al. 2018, , 156, 123, 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f 2018

  6. [6]

    C., Kulkarni, S

    Bellm , E. C., Kulkarni , S. R., Graham , M. J., et al. 2019, , 131, 018002, 10.1088/1538-3873/aaecbe

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/aaecbe 2019

  7. [7]

    2012, , 755, L29, 10.1088/2041-8205/755/2/L29

    Berger , E., Chornock , R., Lunnan , R., et al. 2012, , 755, L29, 10.1088/2041-8205/755/2/L29

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/755/2/l29 2012

  8. [8]

    K., Berger , E., Nicholl , M., & Villar , V

    Blanchard , P. K., Berger , E., Nicholl , M., & Villar , V. A. 2020, , 897, 114, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab9638

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab9638 2020

  9. [9]

    C., et al

    Calzetti , D., Armus , L., Bohlin , R. C., et al. 2000, , 533, 682, 10.1086/308692

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/308692 2000

  10. [10]

    2017, Advances in Astronomy, 2017, 8929054, 10.1155/2017/8929054

    Cano , Z., Wang , S.-Q., Dai , Z.-G., & Wu , X.-F. 2017, Advances in Astronomy, 2017, 8929054, 10.1155/2017/8929054

    work page doi:10.1155/2017/8929054 2017

  11. [11]

    2024, , 685, A99, 10.1051/0004-6361/202347230

    Carniani , S., Venturi , G., Parlanti , E., et al. 2024, , 685, A99, 10.1051/0004-6361/202347230

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347230 2024

  12. [12]

    2023, , 952, 88, 10.3847/1538-4357/acd331

    Carr , C., Michel-Dansac , L., Blaizot , J., et al. 2023, , 952, 88, 10.3847/1538-4357/acd331

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acd331 2023

  13. [13]

    2021, , 906, 104, 10.3847/1538-4357/abc7c3

    Carr , C., Scarlata , C., Henry , A., & Panagia , N. 2021, , 906, 104, 10.3847/1538-4357/abc7c3

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abc7c3 2021

  14. [14]

    2018, , 860, 143, 10.3847/1538-4357/aac48e

    Carr , C., Scarlata , C., Panagia , N., & Henry , A. 2018, , 860, 143, 10.3847/1538-4357/aac48e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aac48e 2018

  15. [15]

    2025 a , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.21197, 10.48550/arXiv.2510.21197

    Carr , C., Cen , R., McCandliss , S., et al. 2025 a , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.21197, 10.48550/arXiv.2510.21197

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.21197 2025

  16. [16]

    A., Cen , R., Scarlata , C., et al

    Carr , C. A., Cen , R., Scarlata , C., et al. 2025 b , , 982, 137, 10.3847/1538-4357/adb72f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adb72f 2025

  17. [17]

    Galactic

    Chabrier , G. 2003, , 115, 763, 10.1086/376392

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/376392 2003

  18. [18]

    H., Yan , L., Kangas , T., et al

    Chen , Z. H., Yan , L., Kangas , T., et al. 2023, , 943, 41, 10.3847/1538-4357/aca161

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aca161 2023

  19. [19]

    2018, , 481, 1690, 10.1093/mnras/sty2380

    Chisholm , J., Tremonti , C., & Leitherer , C. 2018, , 481, 1690, 10.1093/mnras/sty2380

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2380 2018

  20. [20]

    A., Leitherer , C., & Chen , Y

    Chisholm , J., Tremonti , C. A., Leitherer , C., & Chen , Y. 2017, , 469, 4831, 10.1093/mnras/stx1164

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1164 2017

  21. [21]

    A., Leitherer , C., Chen , Y., & Wofford , A

    Chisholm , J., Tremonti , C. A., Leitherer , C., Chen , Y., & Wofford , A. 2016, , 457, 3133, 10.1093/mnras/stw178

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw178 2016

  22. [22]

    A., Leitherer , C., et al

    Chisholm , J., Tremonti , C. A., Leitherer , C., et al. 2015, , 811, 149, 10.1088/0004-637X/811/2/149

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/811/2/149 2015

  23. [23]

    D., Tremonti , C

    Davis , J. D., Tremonti , C. A., Swiggum , C. N., et al. 2023, , 951, 105, 10.3847/1538-4357/accbbf

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/accbbf 2023

  24. [24]

    J., et al

    De Cia , A., Ledoux , C., Fox , A. J., et al. 2012, , 545, A64, 10.1051/0004-6361/201218884

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201218884 2012

  25. [25]

    2018, , 860, 100, 10.3847/1538-4357/aab9b6

    De Cia , A., Gal-Yam , A., Rubin , A., et al. 2018, , 860, 100, 10.3847/1538-4357/aab9b6

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aab9b6 2018

  26. [26]

    , keywords =

    Dekany , R., Smith , R. M., Riddle , R., et al. 2020, , 132, 038001, 10.1088/1538-3873/ab4ca2

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ab4ca2 2020

  27. [27]

    2024, , 691, A231, 10.1051/0004-6361/202450699

    Deng , Y., Li , H., Liu , B., et al. 2024, , 691, A231, 10.1051/0004-6361/202450699

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450699 2024

  28. [28]

    J., Lucey , J

    Efstathiou , G. 2000, , 317, 697, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03665.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03665.x 2000

  29. [29]

    Erb , D. K. 2015, , 523, 169, 10.1038/nature14454

    work page doi:10.1038/nature14454 2015

  30. [30]

    K., Quider , A

    Erb , D. K., Quider , A. M., Henry , A. L., & Martin , C. L. 2012, , 759, 26, 10.1088/0004-637X/759/1/26

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/759/1/26 2012

  31. [31]

    E., Sukhbold, T., & Ugliano, M

    Ertl , T., Janka , H.-T., Woosley , S. E., Sukhbold , T., & Ugliano , M. 2016, , 818, 124, 10.3847/0004-637X/818/2/124

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/818/2/124 2016

  32. [32]

    , keywords =

    Fierlinger , K. M., Burkert , A., Ntormousi , E., et al. 2016, , 456, 710, 10.1093/mnras/stv2699

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2699 2016

  33. [33]

    R., Jaskot , A

    Flury , S. R., Jaskot , A. E., Saldana-Lopez , A., et al. 2025, , 985, 128, 10.3847/1538-4357/adc305

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adc305 2025

  34. [34]

    2015, , 451, 167, 10.1093/mnras/stv960

    Friis , M., De Cia , A., Kr \"u hler , T., et al. 2015, , 451, 167, 10.1093/mnras/stv960

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv960 2015

  35. [35]

    2012, Science, 337, 927, 10.1126/science.1203601

    Gal-Yam , A. 2012, Science, 337, 927, 10.1126/science.1203601

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1203601 2012

  36. [36]

    2024, , 685, A20, 10.1051/0004-6361/202348166

    Gkini , A., Lunnan , R., Schulze , S., et al. 2024, , 685, A20, 10.1051/0004-6361/202348166

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348166 2024

  37. [37]

    2025, , 694, A292, 10.1051/0004-6361/202452357

    Gkini , A., Fransson , C., Lunnan , R., et al. 2025, , 694, A292, 10.1051/0004-6361/202452357

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452357 2025

  38. [38]

    2026, , 707, A338, 10.1051/0004-6361/202557673

    ---. 2026, , 707, A338, 10.1051/0004-6361/202557673

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202557673 2026

  39. [39]

    2024, , 535, 471, 10.1093/mnras/stae2270

    Gomez , S., Nicholl , M., Berger , E., et al. 2024, , 535, 471, 10.1093/mnras/stae2270

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2270 2024

  40. [40]

    , keywords =

    Graham , M. J., Kulkarni , S. R., Bellm , E. C., et al. 2019, , 131, 078001, 10.1088/1538-3873/ab006c

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ab006c 2019

  41. [41]

    G., Izotov , Y

    Guseva , N. G., Izotov , Y. I., Schaerer , D., et al. 2020, , 497, 4293, 10.1093/mnras/staa2197

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2197 2020

  42. [42]

    E., Malesani , D., Fynbo , J

    Hartoog , O. E., Malesani , D., Fynbo , J. P. U., et al. 2015, , 580, A139, 10.1051/0004-6361/201425001

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201425001 2015

  43. [43]

    Hayes , M. J. 2023, , 519, L26, 10.1093/mnrasl/slac135

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slac135 2023

  44. [44]

    J., Runnholm , A., Scarlata , C., Gronke , M., & Rivera-Thorsen , T

    Hayes , M. J., Runnholm , A., Scarlata , C., Gronke , M., & Rivera-Thorsen , T. E. 2023, , 520, 5903, 10.1093/mnras/stad477

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad477 2023

  45. [45]

    C., & Hopkins , P

    Hayward , C. C., & Hopkins , P. F. 2017, , 465, 1682, 10.1093/mnras/stw2888

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2888 2017

  46. [46]

    M., Alexandroff , R

    Heckman , T. M., Alexandroff , R. M., Borthakur , S., Overzier , R., & Leitherer , C. 2015, , 809, 147, 10.1088/0004-637X/809/2/147

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/809/2/147 2015

  47. [47]

    M., & Best, P

    Heckman , T. M., & Best , P. N. 2014, , 52, 589, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-035722

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-035722 2014

  48. [48]

    M., & Borthakur , S

    Heckman , T. M., & Borthakur , S. 2016, , 822, 9, 10.3847/0004-637X/822/1/9

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/822/1/9 2016

  49. [49]

    2000, ApJS, 129, 493, doi: 10.1086/313421

    Heckman , T. M., Lehnert , M. D., Strickland , D. K., & Armus , L. 2000, , 129, 493, 10.1086/313421

    work page doi:10.1086/313421 2000

  50. [50]

    & Giersz, M

    Heger , A., Fryer , C. L., Woosley , S. E., Langer , N., & Hartmann , D. H. 2003, , 591, 288, 10.1086/375341

    work page doi:10.1086/375341 2003

  51. [51]

    E., Watson , D., Jakobsson , P., et al

    Heintz , K. E., Watson , D., Jakobsson , P., et al. 2018, , 479, 3456, 10.1093/mnras/sty1447

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1447 2018

  52. [52]

    M., Foley , R

    Hopkins , P. F., Quataert , E., & Murray , N. 2012, , 421, 3522, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20593.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20593.x 2012

  53. [53]

    2019, , 483, 3363, 10.1093/mnras/sty3252

    Hu , C.-Y. 2019, , 483, 3363, 10.1093/mnras/sty3252

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty3252 2019

  54. [54]

    2024, , 975, 58, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad725f

    Huberty , M., Carr , C., Scarlata , C., et al. 2024, , 975, 58, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad725f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad725f 2024

  55. [55]

    R., Scholtz , J., Danhaive , A

    Ivey , L. R., Scholtz , J., Danhaive , A. L., et al. 2026, , 546, stag094, 10.1093/mnras/stag094

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stag094 2026

  56. [56]

    , keywords =

    Izotov , Y. I., Stasi \'n ska , G., Meynet , G., Guseva , N. G., & Thuan , T. X. 2006, , 448, 955, 10.1051/0004-6361:20053763

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20053763 2006

  57. [57]

    C., & Oey , M

    Jecmen , M. C., & Oey , M. S. 2023, , 958, 149, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0460

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad0460 2023

  58. [58]

    E., Sanders , R

    Kehoe , E., Shapley , A. E., Sanders , R. L., et al. 2025, , 994, 170, 10.3847/1538-4357/ae10b3

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae10b3 2025

  59. [59]

    and Evans, Neal J

    Kennicutt , R. C., & Evans , N. J. 2012, , 50, 531, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125610

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125610 2012

  60. [60]

    S., White, S

    Kroupa , P. 2001, , 322, 231, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04022.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04022.x 2001

  61. [61]

    M., Smette , A., et al

    Ledoux , C., Vreeswijk , P. M., Smette , A., et al. 2009, , 506, 661, 10.1051/0004-6361/200811572

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200811572 2009

  62. [62]

    2014, ApJS, 212, 14, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/212/1/14

    Leitherer , C., Ekstr \"o m , S., Meynet , G., et al. 2014, , 212, 14, 10.1088/0067-0049/212/1/14

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/212/1/14 2014

  63. [63]

    D., et al

    Leitherer , C., Schaerer , D., Goldader , J. D., et al. 1999, , 123, 3, 10.1086/313233

    work page doi:10.1086/313233 1999

  64. [64]

    2015, , 449, 917, 10.1093/mnras/stv320

    Leloudas , G., Schulze , S., Kr \"u hler , T., et al. 2015, , 449, 917, 10.1093/mnras/stv320

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv320 2015

  65. [65]

    2016, , 202, 33, 10.1007/s11214-016-0312-x

    Levan , A., Crowther , P., de Grijs , R., et al. 2016, , 202, 33, 10.1007/s11214-016-0312-x

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-016-0312-x 2016

  66. [66]

    2025, , 991, 49, 10.3847/1538-4357/adf441

    Li , Z., Gronke , M., Heckman , T., et al. 2025, , 991, 49, 10.3847/1538-4357/adf441

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adf441 2025

  67. [67]

    2014, , 787, 138, 10.1088/0004-637X/787/2/138

    Lunnan , R., Chornock , R., Berger , E., et al. 2014, , 787, 138, 10.1088/0004-637X/787/2/138

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/787/2/138 2014

  68. [68]

    M., et al

    Lunnan , R., Fransson , C., Vreeswijk , P. M., et al. 2018 a , Nature Astronomy, 2, 887, 10.1038/s41550-018-0568-z

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-018-0568-z 2018

  69. [69]

    2018 b , , 852, 81, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9f1a

    Lunnan , R., Chornock , R., Berger , E., et al. 2018 b , , 852, 81, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9f1a

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa9f1a 2018

  70. [70]

    Martin , C. L. 2005, , 621, 227, 10.1086/427277

    work page doi:10.1086/427277 2005

  71. [71]

    L., Peng , Z., & Li , Y

    Martin , C. L., Peng , Z., & Li , Y. 2024, , 966, 190, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad34ac

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad34ac 2024

  72. [72]

    L., Shapley , A

    Martin , C. L., Shapley , A. E., Coil , A. L., et al. 2012, , 760, 127, 10.1088/0004-637X/760/2/127

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/760/2/127 2012

  73. [73]

    J., Sorokina , E

    Moriya , T. J., Sorokina , E. I., & Chevalier , R. A. 2018, , 214, 59, 10.1007/s11214-018-0493-6

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-018-0493-6 2018

  74. [74]

    L., Kere s , D., Faucher-Gigu \`e re , C.-A., et al

    Muratov , A. L., Kere s , D., Faucher-Gigu \`e re , C.-A., et al. 2015, , 454, 2691, 10.1093/mnras/stv2126

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2126 2015

  75. [75]

    Murray , N., Quataert , E., & Thompson , T. A. 2005, , 618, 569, 10.1086/426067

    work page doi:10.1086/426067 2005

  76. [76]

    Naab , T., & Ostriker , J. P. 2017, , 55, 59, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-040019

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-040019 2017

  77. [77]

    , number =

    Nakajima , K., Ouchi , M., Xu , Y., et al. 2022, , 262, 3, 10.3847/1538-4365/ac7710

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac7710 2022

  78. [78]

    2019, MNRAS, 490, 3234, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2306

    Nelson , D., Pillepich , A., Springel , V., et al. 2019, , 490, 3234, 10.1093/mnras/stz2306

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2306 2019

  79. [79]

    B., et al

    Newville , M., Stensitzki , T., Allen , D. B., et al. 2016, Lmfit: Non-Linear Least-Square Minimization and Curve-Fitting for Python . 1606.014

    2016

  80. [80]

    O'Connor , E., & Ott , C. D. 2011, , 730, 70, 10.1088/0004-637X/730/2/70

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/730/2/70 2011

Showing first 80 references.