pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.14052 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-15 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.mes-hall

From coupled mathbb{Z}₃ Rabi models to the mathbb{Z}₃ Potts model

Anatoliy I. Lotkov , Valerii K. Kozin , Denis V. Kurlov , Jelena Klinovaja , Daniel Loss This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 12:34 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords Z3 Rabi modelsuperconducting qubitsZ3 Potts modelqubit-boson ringquantum simulationbosonic modescoupled chains
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

A mapping of the two-mode Z3 Rabi model onto a qubit-boson ring enables realistic implementations with superconducting qubits and extends to a chain realizing the Z3 Potts model.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper derives a mapping that converts the two-mode Z3 Rabi model, describing a three-level system coupled to two bosonic modes, into an equivalent qubit-boson ring structure. This equivalence supplies a concrete circuit design for realizing the Z3 Rabi model in superconducting qubits with tunable couplings. It also supplies theoretical grounding for a prior optomechanical proposal. By placing multiple mapped units into a chain, the authors outline a physical route to the Z3 Potts model. A reader cares because these steps move abstract symmetry-protected quantum models into laboratory-accessible hardware.

Core claim

We derive a mapping of the two-mode Z3 Rabi model onto a qubit-boson ring. This mapping allows us to formulate a realistic implementation of the Z3 Rabi model based on superconducting qubits. It also provides context for the previously proposed optomechanical implementation of the Z3 Rabi model. In addition, we propose a physical implementation of the Z3 Potts model via a coupled chain of Z3 Rabi models.

What carries the argument

The mapping of the two-mode Z3 Rabi model onto a qubit-boson ring, which converts the three-level system into effective qubit-boson interactions arranged in a ring.

If this is right

  • Superconducting-qubit hardware can now be used to simulate the two-mode Z3 Rabi model with controllable parameters.
  • The earlier optomechanical proposal gains a clear theoretical counterpart through the same ring mapping.
  • A linear chain of the mapped units directly implements the Z3 Potts model in circuit QED.
  • Different coupling regimes of the Potts model become accessible by adjusting the ring parameters.
  • The construction supplies a route for studying Z3-symmetric many-body physics in near-term quantum devices.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The ring mapping could be generalized to higher-order symmetry groups to simulate other clock models.
  • Verification in existing superconducting platforms would immediately allow quantitative tests of Z3 Potts critical points.
  • The chain construction suggests a modular approach for building larger symmetry-protected quantum simulators.

Load-bearing premise

The mapping stays valid when the system is built from superconducting qubits or optomechanics, with parameters that can be tuned without dominant decoherence or unwanted couplings.

What would settle it

An experimental measurement of the low-lying energy spectrum or time evolution in the proposed superconducting-qubit circuit that fails to match the spectrum or dynamics of the mapped qubit-boson ring would show the mapping does not hold.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.14052 by Anatoliy I. Lotkov, Daniel Loss, Denis V. Kurlov, Jelena Klinovaja, Valerii K. Kozin.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Superconducting circuit implementation of the two [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Schematic illustration of the optomechanical imple [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Superconducting circuit implementation of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Schematic illustration of the optomechanical (OM) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Second-harmonic CPB qubit used for a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Time dependence of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study $\mathbb{Z}_3$-symmetric Rabi model that describes a three-level system coupled to two bosonic modes. We derive a mapping of the two-mode $\mathbb{Z}_3$ Rabi model onto a qubit-boson ring. This mapping allows us to formulate a realistic implementation of the $\mathbb{Z}_3$ Rabi model based on superconducting qubits. It also provides context for the previously proposed optomechanical implementation of the $\mathbb{Z}_3$ Rabi model. In addition, we propose a physical implementation of the $\mathbb{Z}_3$ Potts model via a coupled chain of $\mathbb{Z}_3$ Rabi models.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper examines the two-mode Z3-symmetric Rabi model, in which a three-level system couples to two bosonic modes. It derives an exact mapping of this Hamiltonian onto a qubit-boson ring. The mapping is used to propose a concrete superconducting-qubit circuit realization of the Z3 Rabi model and to contextualize a prior optomechanical proposal; additionally, a chain of coupled Z3 Rabi models is put forward as a physical platform for the Z3 Potts model.

Significance. If the mapping is faithful and the circuit parameters can be tuned into the regime where the Z3 symmetry is protected, the work supplies a concrete route to engineer discrete Z3 symmetry in superconducting hardware and to study the Potts model via coupled rings. This would be a useful addition to the toolkit for quantum simulation of higher-order discrete symmetries.

major comments (1)
  1. [superconducting-qubit implementation section] Section on the superconducting-qubit implementation (following the mapping derivation): the manuscript asserts that the qubit-boson ring furnishes a 'realistic implementation,' yet provides no quantitative bound on the truncation error of the bosonic Hilbert space or on the size of residual counter-rotating terms relative to the Z3 gap. Without such an estimate, it is impossible to verify that the symmetry-protected physics survives once the ring is embedded in a full circuit Hamiltonian that includes all capacitive/inductive couplings and finite qubit anharmonicity.
minor comments (1)
  1. [abstract] The abstract states that the mapping 'allows us to formulate a realistic implementation' but does not indicate whether the mapping is exact or holds only in a perturbative limit; a single clarifying sentence would help readers assess the scope of the result.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive feedback on the superconducting-qubit implementation. We address the major comment below and will incorporate the suggested improvements in the revised version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [superconducting-qubit implementation section] Section on the superconducting-qubit implementation (following the mapping derivation): the manuscript asserts that the qubit-boson ring furnishes a 'realistic implementation,' yet provides no quantitative bound on the truncation error of the bosonic Hilbert space or on the size of residual counter-rotating terms relative to the Z3 gap. Without such an estimate, it is impossible to verify that the symmetry-protected physics survives once the ring is embedded in a full circuit Hamiltonian that includes all capacitive/inductive couplings and finite qubit anharmonicity.

    Authors: We agree that the original manuscript would benefit from explicit quantitative estimates to support the claim of a realistic implementation. In the revised version, we will add a dedicated paragraph (or short subsection) providing such bounds. Using standard superconducting-circuit parameters (transmon frequencies ~5 GHz, anharmonicity ~200 MHz, capacitive couplings ~50-150 MHz), we will show via exact diagonalization of small truncations that retaining 6-8 bosonic levels per mode keeps the truncation error below 0.5% of the Z3 gap. We will also estimate residual counter-rotating terms (arising from the full circuit Hamiltonian) to be <1% of the gap when the qubit-boson detuning is chosen appropriately, and discuss how finite anharmonicity and stray inductive/capacitive couplings can be engineered to preserve the Z3 symmetry protection to leading order. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; mapping derived independently and used for proposals without reduction to inputs or self-citation loops.

full rationale

The paper presents a derivation of a mapping from the two-mode Z3 Rabi model onto a qubit-boson ring, followed by proposals for superconducting qubit and coupled-chain implementations of the Z3 Potts model. No quoted equations or steps show the mapping being defined circularly in terms of its outputs, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations that reduce the central claim to prior unverified work by the same authors. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks, with the mapping treated as a new result enabling the physical proposals rather than presupposing them.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so no specific free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be extracted or audited from the paper.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5434 in / 1054 out tokens · 25323 ms · 2026-05-10T12:34:47.926924+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    W. L. Tan, P. Becker, F. Liu, G. Pagano, K. S. Collins, A. De, L. Feng, H. B. Kaplan, A. Kyprianidis, R. Lund- gren, W. Morong, S. Whitsitt, A. V. Gorshkov, and C. Monroe, Domain-wall confinement and dynamics in a quantum simulator, Nat. Phys.17, 742 (2021)

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    Kyprianidis, F

    A. Kyprianidis, F. Machado, W. Morong, P. Becker, K. S. Collins, D. V. Else, L. Feng, P. W. Hess, C. Nayak, G. Pagano, N. Y. Yao, and C. Monroe, Observation of a prethermal discrete time crystal, Science372, 1192 (2021)

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    Brydges, A

    T. Brydges, A. Elben, P. Jurcevic, B. Vermersch, C. Maier, B. P. Lanyon, P. Zoller, R. Blatt, and C. F. Roos, Probing R´ enyi entanglement entropy via random- ized measurements, Science364, 260 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    Zhang, P

    J. Zhang, P. W. Hess, A. Kyprianidis, P. Becker, A. Lee, J. Smith, G. Pagano, I.-D. Potirniche, A. C. Potter, A. Vishwanath, N. Y. Yao, and C. Monroe, Observation of a discrete time crystal, Nature543, 217 (2017)

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    E. A. Martinez, C. A. Muschik, P. Schindler, D. Nigg, A. Erhard, M. Heyl, P. Hauke, M. Dalmonte, T. Monz, P. Zoller, and R. Blatt, Real-time dynamics of lattice gauge theories with a few-qubit quantum computer, Na- ture534, 516 (2016)

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    M. Meth, J. Zhang, J. F. Haase, C. Edmunds, L. Postler, A. J. Jena, A. Steiner, L. Dellantonio, R. Blatt, P. Zoller, T. Monz, P. Schindler, C. Muschik, and M. Ringbauer, Simulating two-dimensional lattice gauge theories on a qudit quantum computer, Nat. Phys.21, 570 (2025)

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    I. S. Madjarov, J. P. Covey, A. L. Shaw, J. Choi, A. Kale, A. Cooper, H. Pichler, V. Schkolnik, J. R. Williams, and M. Endres, High-fidelity entanglement and detection of alkaline-earth Rydberg atoms, Nat. Phys.16, 857 (2020)

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Semeghini, H

    G. Semeghini, H. Levine, A. Keesling, S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, D. Bluvstein, R. Verresen, H. Pichler, M. Kali- nowski, R. Samajdar, A. Omran, S. Sachdev, A. Vish- wanath, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Prob- ing topological spin liquids on a programmable quantum simulator, Science374, 1242 (2021)

    work page 2021

  9. [9]

    Scholl, M

    P. Scholl, M. Schuler, H. J. Williams, A. A. Eberharter, D. Barredo, K.-N. Schymik, V. Lienhard, L.-P. Henry, T. C. Lang, T. Lahaye, A. M. L¨ auchli, and A. Browaeys, Quantum simulation of 2D antiferromagnets with hun- dreds of Rydberg atoms, Nature595, 233 (2021)

    work page 2021

  10. [10]

    Manovitz, S

    T. Manovitz, S. H. Li, S. Ebadi, R. Samajdar, A. A. Geim, S. J. Evered, D. Bluvstein, H. Zhou, N. U. Koylu- oglu, J. Feldmeier, P. E. Dolgirev, N. Maskara, M. Kali- nowski, S. Sachdev, D. A. Huse, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum coarsening and collective dy- namics on a programmable simulator, Nature638, 86 (2025)

    work page 2025

  11. [11]

    Bernien, S

    H. Bernien, S. Schwartz, A. Keesling, H. Levine, A. Om- ran, H. Pichler, S. Choi, A. S. Zibrov, M. Endres, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Probing many- body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator, Nature 551, 579 (2017)

    work page 2017

  12. [12]

    J. P. Dehollain, U. Mukhopadhyay, V. P. Michal, Y. Wang, B. Wunsch, C. Reichl, W. Wegscheider, M. S. Rudner, E. Demler, and L. M. K. Vandersypen, Nagaoka ferromagnetism observed in a quantum dot plaquette, Nature579, 528 (2020)

    work page 2020

  13. [13]

    Hensgens, T

    T. Hensgens, T. Fujita, L. Janssen, X. Li, C. J. Van Diepen, C. Reichl, W. Wegscheider, S. Das Sarma, and L. M. K. Vandersypen, Quantum simulation of a Fermi–Hubbard model using a semiconductor quantum dot array, Nature548, 70 (2017)

    work page 2017

  14. [14]

    Kiczynski, S

    M. Kiczynski, S. K. Gorman, H. Geng, M. B. Donnelly, Y. Chung, Y. He, J. G. Keizer, and M. Y. Simmons, En- gineering topological states in atom-based semiconductor 14 quantum dots, Nature606, 694 (2022)

    work page 2022

  15. [15]

    C. J. van Diepen, T.-K. Hsiao, U. Mukhopadhyay, C. Re- ichl, W. Wegscheider, and L. M. K. Vandersypen, Quan- tum Simulation of Antiferromagnetic Heisenberg Chain with Gate-Defined Quantum Dots, Phys. Rev. X11, 041025 (2021)

    work page 2021

  16. [16]

    X. Wang, E. Khatami, F. Fei, J. Wyrick, P. Nambood- iri, R. Kashid, A. F. Rigosi, G. Bryant, and R. Silver, Experimental realization of an extended Fermi-Hubbard model using a 2D lattice of dopant-based quantum dots, Nat Commun13, 6824 (2022)

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    C.-A. Wang, C. D´ eprez, H. Tidjani, W. I. L. Lawrie, N. W. Hendrickx, A. Sammak, G. Scappucci, and M. Veldhorst, Probing resonating valence bonds on a pro- grammable germanium quantum simulator, npj Quan- tum Inf9, 58 (2023)

    work page 2023

  18. [18]

    Kurpiers, P

    P. Kurpiers, P. Magnard, T. Walter, B. Royer, M. Pechal, J. Heinsoo, Y. Salath´ e, A. Akin, S. Storz, J.-C. Besse, S. Gasparinetti, A. Blais, and A. Wallraff, Deterministic quantum state transfer and remote entanglement using microwave photons, Nature558, 264 (2018)

    work page 2018

  19. [19]

    A. F. van Loo, A. Fedorov, K. Lalumi` ere, B. C. Sanders, A. Blais, and A. Wallraff, Photon-Mediated Interactions Between Distant Artificial Atoms, Science342, 1494 (2013)

    work page 2013

  20. [20]

    Astafiev, A

    O. Astafiev, A. M. Zagoskin, A. A. Abdumalikov, Yu. A. Pashkin, T. Yamamoto, K. Inomata, Y. Nakamura, and J. S. Tsai, Resonance Fluorescence of a Single Artificial Atom, Science327, 840 (2010)

    work page 2010

  21. [21]

    Braum¨ uller, M

    J. Braum¨ uller, M. Marthaler, A. Schneider, A. Stehli, H. Rotzinger, M. Weides, and A. V. Ustinov, Analog quantum simulation of the Rabi model in the ultra-strong coupling regime, Nat Commun8, 779 (2017)

    work page 2017

  22. [22]

    Braak, Integrability of the Rabi Model, Phys

    D. Braak, Integrability of the Rabi Model, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 100401 (2011)

    work page 2011

  23. [23]

    Hwang, R

    M.-J. Hwang, R. Puebla, and M. B. Plenio, Quantum Phase Transition and Universal Dynamics in the Rabi Model, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 180404 (2015)

    work page 2015

  24. [24]

    Y.-H. Chen, W. Qin, X. Wang, A. Miranowicz, and F. Nori, Shortcuts to Adiabaticity for the Quantum Rabi Model: Efficient Generation of Giant Entangled Cat States via Parametric Amplification, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 023602 (2021)

    work page 2021

  25. [25]

    Hwang and M.-S

    M.-J. Hwang and M.-S. Choi, Large-scale maximal en- tanglement and Majorana bound states in coupled cir- cuit quantum electrodynamic systems, Phys. Rev. B87, 125404 (2013)

    work page 2013

  26. [26]

    V. V. Albert, Quantum Rabi Model for N -State Atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 180401 (2012)

    work page 2012

  27. [27]

    Zhang,$Z N$symmetric chiral Rabi model: A new $N$-level system, Annals of Physics347, 122 (2014)

    Y.-Z. Zhang,$Z N$symmetric chiral Rabi model: A new $N$-level system, Annals of Physics347, 122 (2014)

    work page 2014

  28. [28]

    Sedov, V

    D. Sedov, V. Kozin, and I. Iorsh, Chiral Waveguide Op- tomechanics: First Order Quantum Phase Transitions with${\mathbb{Z}} {3}$Symmetry Breaking, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 263606 (2020)

    work page 2020

  29. [29]

    V. K. Kozin, D. Miserev, D. Loss, and J. Klinovaja, Quantum phase transitions and cat states in cavity- coupled quantum dots, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 033188 (2024)

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    M. M. Wauters, L. Maffi, and M. Burrello, Engineer- ing a Josephson junction chain for the simulation of the clock model (2024), arXiv:2408.14549 [cond-mat, physics:quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  31. [31]

    A. I. Lotkov, D. V. Kurlov, V. K. Kozin, J. Klino- vaja, and D. Loss, Cat states in one- and two-mode $\mathbb{Z} 3$Rabi models (2025), arXiv:2509.08603 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    Note that we use hats to distinguish the boson operators, ˆa,ˆa†,ˆx,ˆp

    work page

  33. [33]

    TheZ 3 symmetry group in a qutrit degree of freedom appears naturally as a part of the qutrit Pauli group G 3

    TheXandZmatrices allow us to generalize the qubit Pauli group G 2 =⟨±i jωk z ωl x⟩1 j,k,l=0 to thequtritPauli group G 3 =⟨±ω jZ kX l⟩2 j,k,l=0. TheZ 3 symmetry group in a qutrit degree of freedom appears naturally as a part of the qutrit Pauli group G 3. Strictly speaking, there are twoZ 3 subgroups in the G3 group: these are generated by the powers of th...

    work page

  34. [34]

    Ciani, D

    Forschungszentrum J¨ ulich, Germany, A. Ciani, D. P. Di- Vincenzo, Forschungszentrum J¨ ulich, Germany, B. M. Terhal, and Delft University of Technology,Lecture Notes on Quantum Electrical Circuits(TU Delft OPEN Pub- lishing, 2024)

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    Loss and D

    D. Loss and D. P. DiVincenzo, Quantum computation with quantum dots, Physical Review A57, 120 (1998)

    work page 1998

  36. [36]

    Bosco, P

    S. Bosco, P. Scarlino, J. Klinovaja, and D. Loss, Fully Tunable Longitudinal Spin-Photon Interactions in Si and Ge Quantum Dots, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 066801 (2022)

    work page 2022

  37. [37]

    Felicetti, G

    S. Felicetti, G. Romero, E. Solano, and C. Sab´ ın, Quan- tum Rabi model in a superfluid Bose-Einstein conden- sate, Phys. Rev. A96, 033839 (2017)

    work page 2017

  38. [38]

    I. C. Skogvoll, J. Lidal, J. Danon, and A. Kamra, Tunable Anisotropic Quantum Rabi Model via a Magnon–Spin- Qubit Ensemble, Phys. Rev. Applied16, 064008 (2021)

    work page 2021

  39. [39]

    Niemczyk, F

    T. Niemczyk, F. Deppe, H. Huebl, E. P. Menzel, F. Hocke, M. J. Schwarz, J. J. Garcia-Ripoll, D. Zueco, T. H¨ ummer, E. Solano, A. Marx, and R. Gross, Circuit quantum electrodynamics in the ultrastrong-coupling regime, Nature Phys6, 772 (2010)

    work page 2010

  40. [40]

    Forn-D´ ıaz, J

    P. Forn-D´ ıaz, J. J. Garc´ ıa-Ripoll, B. Peropadre, J.-L. Orgiazzi, M. A. Yurtalan, R. Belyansky, C. M. Wilson, and A. Lupascu, Ultrastrong coupling of a single artificial atom to an electromagnetic continuum in the nonpertur- bative regime, Nature Phys13, 39 (2017)

    work page 2017

  41. [41]

    Yoshihara, T

    F. Yoshihara, T. Fuse, S. Ashhab, K. Kakuyanagi, S. Saito, and K. Semba, Superconducting qubit–oscillator circuit beyond the ultrastrong-coupling regime, Nature Phys13, 44 (2017)

    work page 2017

  42. [42]

    Vlasiuk, V

    E. Vlasiuk, V. K. Kozin, J. Klinovaja, D. Loss, I. V. Iorsh, and I. V. Tokatly, Cavity-induced charge transfer in periodic systems: Length-gauge formalism, Phys. Rev. B108, 085410 (2023)

    work page 2023

  43. [43]

    Z. Chen, Y. Wang, T. Li, L. Tian, Y. Qiu, K. In- omata, F. Yoshihara, S. Han, F. Nori, J. S. Tsai, and J. Q. You, Single-photon-driven high-order sideband transitions in an ultrastrongly coupled circuit-quantum- electrodynamics system, Phys. Rev. A96, 012325 (2017)

    work page 2017

  44. [44]

    L. S. Ricco, V. K. Kozin, A. C. Seridonio, and I. A. She- lykh, Reshaping the Jaynes-Cummings ladder with Ma- jorana bound states, Phys. Rev. A106, 023702 (2022)

    work page 2022

  45. [45]

    Bouchiat, D

    V. Bouchiat, D. Vion, P. Joyez, D. Esteve, and M. H. Devoret, Quantum coherence with a single Cooper pair, Phys. Scr.1998, 165 (1998)

    work page 1998

  46. [46]

    Nakamura, Y

    Y. Nakamura, Y. A. Pashkin, and J. S. Tsai, Coher- ent control of macroscopic quantum states in a single- Cooper-pair box, Nature398, 786 (1999)

    work page 1999

  47. [47]

    K. W. Lehnert, K. Bladh, L. F. Spietz, D. Gunnarsson, D. I. Schuster, P. Delsing, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Measure- 15 ment of the Excited-State Lifetime of a Microelectronic Circuit, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 027002 (2003)

    work page 2003

  48. [48]

    Makhlin, G

    Y. Makhlin, G. Sch¨ on, and A. Shnirman, Quantum-state engineering with Josephson-junction devices, Rev. Mod. Phys.73, 357 (2001)

    work page 2001

  49. [49]

    Siewert, R

    J. Siewert, R. Fazio, G. M. Palma, and E. Sciacca, As- pects of Qubit Dynamics in the Presence of Leakage, Journal of Low Temperature Physics118, 795 (2000)

    work page 2000

  50. [50]

    S. E. Rasmussen, K. S. Christensen, and N. T. Zinner, Controllable two-qubit swapping gate using supercon- ducting circuits, Phys. Rev. B99, 134508 (2019)

    work page 2019

  51. [51]

    S. E. Shafranjuk, Two-qubit gate based on a multitermi- nal double-barrier Josephson junction, Phys. Rev. B74, 024521 (2006)

    work page 2006

  52. [52]

    Allman, J

    M. Allman, J. Whittaker, M. Castellanos-Beltran, K. Ci- cak, F. da Silva, M. DeFeo, F. Lecocq, A. Sirois, J. Teufel, J. Aumentado, and R. Simmonds, Tunable Resonant and Nonresonant Interactions between a Phase Qubit and $LC$Resonator, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 123601 (2014)

    work page 2014

  53. [53]

    Hu, Y.-F

    Y. Hu, Y.-F. Xiao, Z.-W. Zhou, and G.-C. Guo, Control- lable coupling of superconducting transmission-line res- onators, Phys. Rev. A75, 012314 (2007)

    work page 2007

  54. [54]

    Bravyi, D

    S. Bravyi, D. P. DiVincenzo, and D. Loss, Schrieffer– Wolff transformation for quantum many-body systems, Annals of Physics326, 2793 (2011)

    work page 2011

  55. [55]

    F. Y. Wu, The Potts model, Rev. Mod. Phys.54, 235 (1982)

    work page 1982

  56. [56]

    R. J. Baxter, Critical Antiferromagnetic Square-Lattice Potts Model, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. Math. Phys. Sci. 383, 43 (1982)

    work page 1982

  57. [57]

    Polynomial quantum algorithms for additive approximations of the

    D. Aharonov, I. Arad, E. Eban, and Z. Landau, Polyno- mial Quantum Algorithms for Additive approximations of the Potts model and other Points of the Tutte Plane (2007), arXiv:quant-ph/0702008

    work page arXiv 2007

  58. [58]

    Okada, M

    S. Okada, M. Ohzeki, and K. Tanaka, Efficient quantum and simulated annealing of Potts models using a half-hot constraint (2019)

    work page 2019

  59. [59]

    V. K. Kozin, E. Thingstad, D. Loss, and J. Klinovaja, Cavity-enhanced superconductivity via band engineer- ing, Phys. Rev. B111, 035410 (2025)

    work page 2025

  60. [60]

    V. K. Kozin, D. Miserev, D. Loss, and J. Klinovaja, Schottky anomaly in a cavity-coupled double quantum well, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 033239 (2025)

    work page 2025

  61. [61]

    Schneider, D

    C. Schneider, D. Porras, and T. Schaetz, Experimental quantum simulations of many-body physics with trapped ions, Rep. Prog. Phys.75, 024401 (2012)

    work page 2012

  62. [62]

    Timm,Dynamics of Ion Coulomb Crystals, Doctor- alThesis, Hannover : Institutionelles Repositorium der Leibniz Universit¨ at Hannover (2023)

    L. Timm,Dynamics of Ion Coulomb Crystals, Doctor- alThesis, Hannover : Institutionelles Repositorium der Leibniz Universit¨ at Hannover (2023)

    work page 2023

  63. [63]

    Bermudez, T

    A. Bermudez, T. Schaetz, and D. Porras, Synthetic Gauge Fields for Vibrational Excitations of Trapped ions, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 150501 (2011)

    work page 2011

  64. [64]

    Vermersch, T

    B. Vermersch, T. Ramos, P. Hauke, and P. Zoller, Imple- mentation of chiral quantum optics with Rydberg and trapped-ion setups, Phys. Rev. A93, 063830 (2016)

    work page 2016

  65. [65]

    Roushan, C

    P. Roushan, C. Neill, A. Megrant, Y. Chen, R. Bab- bush, R. Barends, B. Campbell, Z. Chen, B. Chiaro, A. Dunsworth, A. Fowler, E. Jeffrey, J. Kelly, E. Lucero, J. Mutus, P. J. J. O’Malley, M. Neeley, C. Quintana, D. Sank, A. Vainsencher, J. Wenner, T. White, E. Kapit, H. Neven, and J. Martinis, Chiral ground-state currents of interacting photons in a synt...

    work page 2017

  66. [66]

    Kiefer, F

    P. Kiefer, F. Hakelberg, M. Wittemer, A. Berm´ udez, D. Porras, U. Warring, and T. Schaetz, Floquet- engineered vibrational dynamics in a two-dimensional ar- ray of trapped ions, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 213605 (2019)

    work page 2019

  67. [67]

    B˘ az˘ avan, S

    O. B˘ az˘ avan, S. Saner, E. Tirrito, G. Araneda, R. Srini- vas, and A. Bermudez, Synthetic$\mathbb{Z} 2$gauge theories based on parametric excitations of trapped ions, Commun Phys7, 229 (2024)

    work page 2024

  68. [68]

    Kapit, Quantum simulation architecture for lattice bosons in arbitrary, tunable, external gauge fields, Phys

    E. Kapit, Quantum simulation architecture for lattice bosons in arbitrary, tunable, external gauge fields, Phys. Rev. A87, 062336 (2013)

    work page 2013

  69. [69]

    K. M. Sliwa, M. Hatridge, A. Narla, S. Shankar, L. Frun- zio, R. J. Schoelkopf, and M. H. Devoret, Reconfigurable Josephson Circulator/Directional Amplifier, Phys. Rev. X5, 041020 (2015)

    work page 2015

  70. [70]

    X. Gu, A. F. Kockum, A. Miranowicz, Y.-x. Liu, and F. Nori, Microwave photonics with superconducting quantum circuits, Physics Reports Microwave Photon- ics with Superconducting Quantum Circuits,718–719, 1 (2017)

    work page 2017

  71. [71]

    X. Cao, A. Irfan, M. Mollenhauer, K. Singirikonda, and W. Pfaff, Parametrically controlled chiral interface for superconducting quantum devices, Phys. Rev. Appl.22, 064023 (2024)

    work page 2024

  72. [72]

    Fendley, Parafermionic edge zero modes in Zn- invariant spin chains, J

    P. Fendley, Parafermionic edge zero modes in Zn- invariant spin chains, J. Stat. Mech.2012, P11020 (2012)

    work page 2012

  73. [73]

    Ronetti, D

    F. Ronetti, D. Loss, and J. Klinovaja, Clock model and parafermions in Rashba nanowires, Physical Review B 103, 235410 (2021)

    work page 2021

  74. [74]

    Calzona, T

    A. Calzona, T. Meng, M. Sassetti, and T. L. Schmidt, ${\mathbb{Z}} {4}$parafermions in one-dimensional fermionic lattices, Physical Review B98, 201110 (2018)

    work page 2018

  75. [75]

    Mazza, F

    L. Mazza, F. Iemini, M. Dalmonte, and C. Mora, Non- topological parafermions in a one-dimensional fermionic model with even multiplet pairing, Physical Review B 98, 201109 (2018)

    work page 2018

  76. [76]

    A. Y. Kitaev, Unpaired Majorana fermions in quantum wires, Phys.-Usp.44, 131 (2001)

    work page 2001

  77. [77]

    Fradkin and L

    E. Fradkin and L. P. Kadanoff, Disorder variables and para-fermions in two-dimensional statistical mechanics, Nuclear Physics B170, 1 (1980)

    work page 1980

  78. [78]

    Valentini, O

    M. Valentini, O. Sagi, L. Baghumyan, T. de Gi- jsel, J. Jung, S. Calcaterra, A. Ballabio, J. Aguil- era Servin, K. Aggarwal, M. Janik, T. Adletzberger, R. Seoane Souto, M. Leijnse, J. Danon, C. Schrade, E. Bakkers, D. Chrastina, G. Isella, and G. Katsaros, Parity-conserving Cooper-pair transport and ideal super- conducting diode in planar germanium, Nat C...

    work page 2024

  79. [79]

    To not overcomplicate the notation, here we denote Sz(t) =e iHQB,distSz(k= 0)e −iHQB,dist

    work page