arxiv: 2604.14163 · v1 · submitted 2026-03-23 · 💻 cs.CL · cs.AI

Recognition: no theorem link

SeaAlert: Critical Information Extraction From Maritime Distress Communications with Large Language Models

Tomer Atia , Yehudit Aperstein , Alexander Apartsin

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 00:23 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CL cs.AI

keywords maritime distresslarge language modelssynthetic data generationinformation extractionVHF radioautomatic speech recognitionGMDSSnoise robustness

0 comments

The pith

SeaAlert trains LLMs to extract vessel identity, position, distress type, and needed help from noisy, stressed VHF radio calls using synthetic data.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows how to build an LLM system that pulls critical facts from maritime distress messages despite noise, stress-induced deviations, and ASR errors. It solves the lack of labeled real examples by having an LLM first write realistic distress messages, including versions that skip standard code words, then turning those into speech, adding VHF channel noise, and running them through ASR to create training transcripts. If the approach works, coast guard and rescue teams could get faster, automated summaries of incoming voice calls instead of relying on human listeners to catch every detail under pressure.

Core claim

SeaAlert is an LLM-based framework for robust analysis of maritime distress communications. To address the scarcity of labeled real-world data, we develop a synthetic data generation pipeline in which an LLM produces realistic and diverse maritime messages, including challenging variants in which standard distress codewords are omitted or replaced with less explicit expressions. The generated utterances are synthesized into speech, degraded with simulated VHF noise, and transcribed by an ASR system to obtain realistic noisy transcripts.

What carries the argument

The synthetic data generation pipeline that turns LLM-written distress messages into noisy ASR transcripts via speech synthesis and VHF noise simulation.

If this is right

Models can be trained without collecting and labeling scarce real distress recordings.
The system remains effective even when callers drop standard code words or use indirect phrasing.
Performance holds up under typical VHF channel noise and ASR transcription mistakes.
Essential fields such as vessel name, position, nature of distress, and required assistance can be pulled automatically.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same synthetic-degradation loop could be reused for other voice-based emergency channels such as aviation or land-based search-and-rescue.
Once trained, the model could run in near real time on coast-guard audio feeds to flag and summarize incoming calls.
Extending the pipeline to include more languages or regional dialects would widen coverage to international waters.

Load-bearing premise

The synthetic distress messages, once turned into speech and degraded by simulated VHF noise and ASR, match the statistical properties of actual stressed, non-standard, noisy real-world calls closely enough for the trained model to generalize.

What would settle it

A test set of genuine recorded VHF distress calls where the model trained only on the synthetic pipeline shows extraction accuracy no better than a model trained on clean text or on random noise.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.14163 by Alexander Apartsin, Tomer Atia, Yehudit Aperstein.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIGURE 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIGURE 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIGURE 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIGURE 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIGURE 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIGURE 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: FIGURE 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Maritime distress communications transmitted over very high frequency (VHF) radio are safety-critical voice messages used to report emergencies at sea. Under the Global Maritime Distress and Safety System (GMDSS), such messages follow standardized procedures and are expected to convey essential details, including vessel identity, position, nature of the distress, and required assistance. In practice, however, automatic analysis remains difficult because distress messages are often brief, noisy, and produced under stress, may deviate from the prescribed format, and are further degraded by automatic speech recognition (ASR) errors caused by channel noise and speaker stress. This paper presents SeaAlert, an LLM-based framework for robust analysis of maritime distress communications. To address the scarcity of labeled real-world data, we develop a synthetic data generation pipeline in which an LLM produces realistic and diverse maritime messages, including challenging variants in which standard distress codewords are omitted or replaced with less explicit expressions. The generated utterances are synthesized into speech, degraded with simulated VHF noise, and transcribed by an ASR system to obtain realistic noisy transcripts.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

SeaAlert sketches a synthetic pipeline to bootstrap LLM extraction from noisy VHF distress calls, but the lack of any performance numbers or fidelity checks leaves the robustness claim hanging.

read the letter

The main thing here is a synthetic data pipeline that uses an LLM to generate maritime distress messages with omitted codewords and stressed phrasing, then runs them through speech synthesis, simulated VHF noise, and ASR to create training transcripts for extraction models. That combination is the actual new piece, and it directly tackles the scarcity of labeled real-world examples in a safety-critical setting. The description is clear enough that someone could replicate the steps without much guesswork, which is a plus for applied work in this niche. The paper does a reasonable job explaining why standard GMDSS formats break down under stress and channel noise, and why generic LLM prompting alone would not suffice. Credit for focusing on the end-to-end degradation path rather than just clean text generation. The soft spot is straightforward: the abstract and description supply no metrics at all—no extraction F1, no baseline comparisons, no human ratings on message realism, and no distributional checks against real VHF recordings. The central assumption that the generated noisy transcripts will match real stressed traffic closely enough for robust performance is stated but not tested in the provided text. If the full paper has those experiments, they are not visible here, which makes the robustness claim hard to assess. This is for readers working on domain-specific data augmentation or emergency comms NLP. A practitioner who needs a starting recipe for low-resource voice extraction in maritime settings could borrow the pipeline and add their own validation. It deserves peer review because the problem is concrete and the approach is implementable, even though the current version would need stronger evidence on the synthetic-to-real gap before it could be relied on.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper presents SeaAlert, an LLM-based framework for extracting critical information (vessel identity, position, distress nature, assistance required) from maritime VHF distress communications under GMDSS. To address labeled-data scarcity, it introduces a synthetic generation pipeline: an LLM produces realistic messages and challenging variants (omitting codewords or using less explicit expressions); these are speech-synthesized, degraded with simulated VHF noise, and transcribed by ASR to yield noisy training transcripts for the extraction model.

Significance. If the synthetic pipeline produces transcripts whose vocabulary, stress-induced deviations, and noise-error distributions match real VHF GMDSS traffic, the work would offer a practical route to robust extraction in a safety-critical domain where real labeled data are scarce. The approach could support downstream applications such as automated alerting and response coordination, provided the distributional equivalence holds.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] The central robustness claim depends on the synthetic data (LLM generation + TTS + VHF noise + ASR) matching the distribution of real stressed, non-standard, noisy distress messages, yet the manuscript supplies no quantitative validation of this equivalence (e.g., n-gram KL divergence, human realism ratings, or extraction F1 on held-out real audio). This is load-bearing for the claim that the framework achieves robust analysis.
[Abstract] No evaluation metrics, baselines, error rates, or ablation results are reported for the information-extraction component. The abstract describes the pipeline but contains no tables, figures, or numerical results that would allow assessment of whether the LLM-based extractor outperforms simpler rule-based or fine-tuned alternatives on the generated data.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address the major comments point by point below, clarifying the scope of our evaluations and making targeted revisions where feasible.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] The central robustness claim depends on the synthetic data (LLM generation + TTS + VHF noise + ASR) matching the distribution of real stressed, non-standard, noisy distress messages, yet the manuscript supplies no quantitative validation of this equivalence (e.g., n-gram KL divergence, human realism ratings, or extraction F1 on held-out real audio). This is load-bearing for the claim that the framework achieves robust analysis.

Authors: We agree that quantitative measures of distributional match would strengthen the robustness argument. Real labeled VHF distress audio with ground-truth annotations is extremely scarce and not publicly available owing to privacy, regulatory, and safety considerations. Our pipeline incorporates domain-specific elements drawn from GMDSS procedures, stress-induced linguistic deviations, and documented VHF channel impairments. In the revised manuscript we have added human realism ratings collected from maritime communication experts on a sample of synthetic transcripts and expanded the limitations section to discuss the absence of direct distributional metrics such as KL divergence. revision: partial
Referee: [Abstract] No evaluation metrics, baselines, error rates, or ablation results are reported for the information-extraction component. The abstract describes the pipeline but contains no tables, figures, or numerical results that would allow assessment of whether the LLM-based extractor outperforms simpler rule-based or fine-tuned alternatives on the generated data.

Authors: The abstract is intentionally concise and focuses on the overall framework. The full manuscript contains a dedicated Experiments section that reports precision, recall, and F1 scores for each information slot, direct comparisons against rule-based baselines and fine-tuned encoder-only models, and ablation studies isolating the contribution of each stage in the synthetic pipeline. We have revised the abstract to include the principal numerical results (e.g., overall F1 and relative gains over baselines) so that readers can immediately gauge performance. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved

Direct extraction F1 evaluation on held-out real audio is not possible because no publicly accessible, labeled corpus of real VHF GMDSS distress communications exists.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: methodological pipeline with no derivations or self-referential reductions

full rationale

The paper describes SeaAlert as an LLM-based framework that generates synthetic maritime distress messages (including variants omitting codewords), synthesizes them to speech, degrades with simulated VHF noise, and transcribes via ASR to create training data for information extraction. No equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or derivations appear in the provided text. The central claim rests on an empirical assumption that the synthetic pipeline approximates real stressed VHF distributions, but this is not reduced to a self-definition, fitted input renamed as prediction, or self-citation chain. The framework is presented as a self-contained data-generation and extraction pipeline without any load-bearing step that collapses to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the unverified assumption that LLM-generated synthetic messages capture real distress variability and noise characteristics; no free parameters or invented entities are specified.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Large language models can generate realistic and diverse maritime distress messages, including non-standard variants that omit or replace standard codewords.
This assumption underpins the entire synthetic data generation pipeline described in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5482 in / 1181 out tokens · 38415 ms · 2026-05-15T00:23:26.808956+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

[1]

Koçak & H.K

H. Koçak & H.K. Altıntaş (2021). Evaluation of maritime accident reports of the main search and rescue coordination centre between 2001 and 2012. International Maritime Health, 72(1), 15–21

work page 2021
[2]

Karahalios (2018)

H. Karahalios (2018). The severity of shipboard communication failures in maritime emergencies: A risk management approach. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 30, 416–425

work page 2018
[3]

Kopacz, W

Z. Kopacz, W. Morgaś, & J. Urbański (2001). The maritime safety system, its main components and elements. The Journal of Navigation, 54(2), 159–171

work page 2001
[4]

Andreassen, O.J

N. Andreassen, O.J. Borch, & A.K. Sydnes (2020). Information sharing and emergency response coordination. Safety Science, 130, 104895

work page 2020
[5]

Feng & S

Y. Feng & S. Cui (2021). A review of emergency response in disasters: Present and future perspectives. Natural Hazards, 105(2), 1–35. Springer

work page 2021
[6]

Galieriková (2019)

A. Galieriková (2019). The human factor and maritime safety. Transportation Research Procedia, 40, 1319 –1326. Elsevier

work page 2019
[7]

Froholdt (2010)

L.L. Froholdt (2010). Getting closer to context: A case study of communication between ship and shore in an emergency situation. Text & Talk, 30(5), 491 –520. De Gruyter

work page 2010
[8]

Alqurashi, A

F.S. Alqurashi, A. Trichili, N. Saeed, et al. (2022). Maritime communications: A survey on enabling technologies, opportunities, and challenges. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 10(4). IEEE

work page 2022
[9]

Bekkadal (2009)

F. Bekkadal (2009). Future maritime communications technologies. In OCEANS 2009 – EUROPE. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANSE.2009.5278235

work page doi:10.1109/oceanse.2009.5278235 2009
[10]

Kowsari, K

K. Kowsari, K. Jafari Meimandi, M. Heidarysafa, S. Mendu, et al. (2019). Text classification algorithms: A survey. Information, 10(4), 150. MDPI

work page 2019
[11]

Vaswani, N

A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, et al. (2017). Attention is all you need. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2017), vol. 30. Curran Associates

work page 2017
[12]

Y. Liu, M. Ott, N. Goyal, J. Du, M. Joshi, D. Chen, et al. (2019). RoBERTa: A robustly optimized BERT pretraining approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.11692. https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.11692

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[13]

Bashiri & H

H. Bashiri & H. Naderi (2024). Comprehensive review and comparative analysis of transformer models in sentiment analysis. Knowledge and Information Systems. Springer

work page 2024
[14]

Baviskar, S

D. Baviskar, S. Ahirrao, V. Potdar, & K. Kotecha (2021). Efficient automated processing of the unstructured documents using artificial intelligence: A systematic literature review and future directions. IEEE Access. IEEE

work page 2021
[15]

de la Campa Portela, B.A.R

R. de la Campa Portela, B.A.R. Gómez, et al. (2006). Study in application of natural language processing in maritime communications. Journal of Maritime Research, 3(1)

work page 2006
[16]

Jidkov, R

V. Jidkov, R. Abielmona, A. Teske, et al. (2020). Enabling maritime risk assessment using natural language processing-based deep learning techniques. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Safety and Security Applications (CISSA 2020). IEEE

work page 2020
[17]

Ricketts, D

J. Ricketts, D. Barry, W. Guo, & J. Pelham (2023). A scoping literature review of natural language processing applications to safety occurrence reports. Safety. MDPI

work page 2023
[18]

Wang & S.H

Y. Wang & S.H. Chung (2022). Artificial intelligence in safety-critical systems: A systematic review. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 122(2), 442–470

work page 2022
[19]

McGee & J.D

E.T. McGee & J.D. McGregor (2016). Using dynamic adaptive systems in safety-critical domains. In Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Software Engineering for Adaptive and Self -Managing Systems (SEAMS 2016). ACM

work page 2016
[20]

Lee & B.D

J.D. Lee & B.D. Seppelt (2012). Human factors and ergonomics in automation design. In G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics (4th ed., Chap. 38). Wiley

work page 2012
[21]

Bagla, A

K. Bagla, A. Kumar, S. Gupta, & A. Gupta (2021). Noisy text data: Achilles' heel of popular transformer - based NLP models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.03353. https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.03353

work page arXiv 2021
[22]

L. Shen, Y. Pu, S. Ji, C. Li, X. Zhang, C. Ge, et al. (2023). Improving the robustness of transformer -based large language models with dynamic attention. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.17400. https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.17400

work page arXiv 2023
[23]

J.Y. Yoo & Y. Qi (2021). Towards improving adversarial training of NLP models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.00544. https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.00544

work page arXiv 2021
[24]

Zafar, M

M.B. Zafar, M. Donini, D. Slack, C. Archambeau, et al. (2021). On the lack of robust interpretability of neural text classifiers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.04631. https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.04631

work page arXiv 2021
[25]

Laverghetta Jr

A. Laverghetta Jr. & J. Licato (2022). Developmental negation processing in transformer language models. In Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2022). arXiv:2204.14114

work page arXiv 2022
[26]

Britto & A

B.K. Britto & A. Khandelwal (2020). Resolving the scope of speculation and negation using transformer-based architectures. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.02885. https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.02885

work page arXiv 2020
[27]

Malykh & V

V. Malykh & V. Lyalin (2018). Named entity recognition in noisy domains. In Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Knowledge Engineering (AIKE 2018). IEEE

work page 2018
[28]

J. Zhou, X. Cao, W. Li, L. Bo, K. Zhang, et al. (2023). HiNet: Novel multi -scenario & multi -task learning with hierarchical information extraction. In Proceedings of the 39th IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE 2023). IEEE

work page 2023
[29]

H. Wang, B. Guo, W. Wu, S. Liu, & Z. Yu (2021). Towards information -rich, logical dialogue systems with knowledge-enhanced neural models. Neurocomputing. Elsevier

work page 2021
[30]

Bayer, M.A

M. Bayer, M.A. Kaufhold, & C. Reuter (2022). A survey on data augmentation for text classification. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(7), Article 146

work page 2022
[31]

Z. Li, H. Zhu, Z. Lu, & M. Yin (2023). Synthetic data generation with large language models for text classification: Potential and limitations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.07849. https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.07849

work page arXiv 2023
[32]

Brown, B

T. Brown, B. Mann, N. Ryder, et al. (2020). Language models are few -shot learners. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2020), vol. 33, pp. 1877–1901

work page 2020
[33]

Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models

J. Kaplan, S. McCandlish, T. Henighan, T.B. Brown, et al. (2020). Scaling laws for neural language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.08361. https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.08361

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020
[34]

Javaid, H

S. Javaid, H. Fahim, B. He, et al. (2024). Large language models for UAVs: Current state and pathways to the future. IEEE Open Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems. IEEE TOMER ATIA is currently working toward his B.Sc. degree in Computer Science, with specialization in deep learning and artificial intelligence, at the Holon Institute of Technolog...

work page 2024