pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.14291 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-15 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.stat-mech

Operator Space Transport and the Emergence of Boundary Time Crystals

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 13:15 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords boundary time crystalsLindbladian dynamicsoperator space transportnon-reciprocal transportcollective spin systemsweak symmetriesnon-Hermitian hopping
0
0 comments X

The pith

Boundary time crystals emerge from non-reciprocal transport of operator weight across tensor sectors in the Lindbladian.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a quantum framework that maps Lindblad evolution of collective spins onto transport in an irreducible tensor representation of operator space. In this picture, the dynamics becomes a non-Hermitian hopping problem on a lattice of tensor sectors. BTC behavior appears precisely when this transport is non-reciprocal, which delocalizes the Liouvillian eigenmodes and removes non-trivial weak symmetries. The mapping unifies collective precession, pure relaxation, and the BTC phase under one description and supplies a microscopic account of why BTC oscillations ignore initial conditions.

Core claim

BTCs arise because the Liouvillian lacks non-trivial weak symmetries; in the tensor representation this absence manifests as non-reciprocal hopping that spreads operator weight across multiple sectors and thereby delocalizes the eigenmodes.

What carries the argument

Irreducible tensor representation of operator space, which converts the Lindbladian into a non-Hermitian hopping model whose transport properties determine the dynamical phase.

If this is right

  • Collective spin dynamics fall into three regimes—precession, relaxation, and BTC—identified by the structure of operator-space transport.
  • BTC oscillations are insensitive to initial conditions because eigenmodes are delocalized across tensor sectors.
  • The framework supplies a direct microscopic link between dissipative many-body evolution and non-Hermitian transport.
  • Presence or absence of weak symmetries in the Liouvillian becomes a practical diagnostic for the BTC phase.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same operator-space transport lens could be applied to other open quantum systems to locate analogous time-crystalline regimes.
  • Non-reciprocal hopping in operator space may share features with the non-Hermitian skin effect, suggesting localization-delocalization transitions could be engineered.
  • Numerical checks of mode delocalization in larger spin ensembles would provide a direct test of the transport mechanism.

Load-bearing premise

The irreducible tensor representation fully and exactly captures the collective spin Liouvillian without missing sectors or further approximations.

What would settle it

A collective spin system that exhibits persistent BTC oscillations while its Liouvillian retains non-trivial weak symmetries, or whose eigenmodes remain localized in the tensor sectors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.14291 by Ahsan Nazir, Alessandro Principi, Dominik Nemeth, Robert-Jan Slager.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic Representation of the Spherical Tensor Decomposition of the Density Operator. a) The density operator [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Operator Space Classification of Collective Spin Dynamics. When a weak symmetry is present, either [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Rank Coupling Matrix. A numerical visualization [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Diagonal On-site Decay Coefficients. The numeri [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Hybridization of Spherical Tensor Modes. Results are shown for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Heatmap on the ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Boundary time crystals (BTCs) are prominent examples of continuous time crystals in collective spin systems governed by Lindbladian evolution. To date, their analysis has mostly relied on semiclassical and numerical approaches. Here, we develop a fully quantum-compatible framework to classify collective spin dynamics and show that BTC behavior emerges from the absence of non-trivial weak symmetries of the Liouvillian. To this end, we introduce an irreducible tensor representation of operator space, in which the Lindbladian dynamics maps onto a non-Hermitian hopping problem. Within this picture, the dynamics corresponds to the transport of operator weight across tensor sectors. This mapping allows an identification of distinct dynamical regimes, including collective precession, pure relaxation, and the BTC phase, within a single unified framework. We show that BTCs arise from non-reciprocal transport in operator space, which delocalizes Liouvillian eigenmodes across multiple tensor sectors. This non-reciprocal transport provides a microscopic mechanism for the insensitivity to initial conditions of BTC oscillations. More broadly, our results establish operator space transport as a perspective for understanding dissipative many-body dynamics and highlights connections to non-Hermitian phenomena.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper develops an irreducible tensor representation of operator space for collective spin systems under Lindbladian evolution. It maps the dynamics to a non-Hermitian hopping problem across tensor sectors and claims that boundary time crystals emerge precisely from the absence of non-trivial weak symmetries of the Liouvillian, via non-reciprocal operator transport that delocalizes eigenmodes and renders oscillations insensitive to initial conditions. This framework unifies regimes of collective precession, pure relaxation, and the BTC phase.

Significance. If the tensor mapping is complete and exact, the work supplies a fully quantum, symmetry-based classification of dissipative spin dynamics that goes beyond semiclassical treatments and connects BTCs to non-Hermitian transport phenomena. The unified regime identification and the microscopic account of initial-condition insensitivity would be valuable contributions to the study of open many-body systems.

major comments (2)
  1. [section introducing the irreducible tensor representation] The central claim that BTC behavior follows from absent non-trivial weak symmetries via non-reciprocal transport rests on the irreducible tensor representation exhausting the full operator space of the collective-spin Liouvillian. The manuscript must explicitly demonstrate (e.g., by dimension counting or small-N verification in the section introducing the tensor basis) that no sectors are omitted for finite N and that the mapping introduces no hidden approximations beyond those stated.
  2. [section on non-reciprocal transport and eigenmode delocalization] The identification of non-reciprocal transport as the mechanism for eigenmode delocalization and initial-condition-insensitive oscillations requires a concrete derivation showing how the absence of weak symmetries produces the non-reciprocity. Please supply the explicit steps linking the symmetry classification to the hopping rates (referencing the relevant equations in the transport mapping).
minor comments (2)
  1. Clarify the precise definition of 'weak symmetries' of the Liouvillian and how they are diagnosed within the tensor representation; a short self-contained paragraph or reference would aid readability.
  2. Ensure all equations in the tensor-basis construction and hopping mapping are numbered and cross-referenced in the text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We are grateful to the referee for the thorough review and the positive evaluation of our work. The comments highlight important points for clarification, which we address below. We will revise the manuscript accordingly to incorporate the suggested demonstrations and derivations.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: The central claim that BTC behavior follows from absent non-trivial weak symmetries via non-reciprocal transport rests on the irreducible tensor representation exhausting the full operator space of the collective-spin Liouvillian. The manuscript must explicitly demonstrate (e.g., by dimension counting or small-N verification in the section introducing the tensor basis) that no sectors are omitted for finite N and that the mapping introduces no hidden approximations beyond those stated.

    Authors: We agree with the referee that an explicit demonstration of completeness is necessary to support the central claims. In the revised version, we will add a new subsection in the introduction of the irreducible tensor representation (Section II) that includes a dimension-counting argument. Specifically, we will show that for a collective spin system of N spins, the irreducible tensor operators T_{k,q} with k = 0 to N span the full operator space of dimension (N+1)^2 in the symmetric subspace, matching the Liouvillian's action exactly. We will also provide a small-N verification for N=2, explicitly listing the basis elements and confirming the mapping is complete with no omitted sectors or hidden approximations beyond the collective limit stated in the paper. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The identification of non-reciprocal transport as the mechanism for eigenmode delocalization and initial-condition-insensitive oscillations requires a concrete derivation showing how the absence of weak symmetries produces the non-reciprocity. Please supply the explicit steps linking the symmetry classification to the hopping rates (referencing the relevant equations in the transport mapping).

    Authors: We thank the referee for this request for greater explicitness. While the manuscript outlines the link in the non-reciprocal transport section, we will expand it in the revision with a dedicated derivation. Starting from the weak symmetry classification (Eq. 3), we will show step-by-step that the absence of non-trivial weak symmetries leads to asymmetric matrix elements of the Lindbladian between tensor sectors: the forward hopping amplitude from sector k to k+1 is determined by the jump operator action, while the backward amplitude differs, yielding the non-reciprocal terms in the transport mapping (Eq. 7). This directly produces the delocalized eigenmodes and initial-condition insensitivity. The added steps will reference the relevant equations explicitly. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: BTC phase identified from explicit mapping to non-reciprocal operator transport

full rationale

The derivation introduces an irreducible tensor representation of operator space as a new framework, maps the collective-spin Lindbladian onto a non-Hermitian hopping problem across tensor sectors, and then classifies dynamical regimes (including BTC) from the resulting transport properties and absence of non-trivial weak symmetries. No step reduces a claimed prediction or central result to a fitted parameter, self-referential definition, or load-bearing self-citation chain; the BTC identification follows directly from the constructed transport picture without circular closure. The framework is self-contained against the stated mapping and symmetry analysis.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the mathematical mapping of the Lindbladian to a non-Hermitian hopping problem in tensor space and the symmetry-based classification of dynamical regimes; no free parameters are introduced and no new physical entities are postulated.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Collective spin Lindbladian dynamics admits an exact irreducible tensor operator representation that converts the evolution into a non-Hermitian hopping problem on tensor sectors.
    This is the core technical step introduced to enable the transport picture and regime classification.
  • domain assumption Absence of non-trivial weak symmetries of the Liouvillian implies non-reciprocal transport and delocalization of eigenmodes.
    Directly stated as the condition for the BTC phase.
invented entities (1)
  • Operator space transport no independent evidence
    purpose: Conceptual description of Liouvillian dynamics as movement of operator weight across irreducible tensor sectors.
    New interpretive framework introduced to unify dynamical regimes; no independent falsifiable prediction outside the mapping itself.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5510 in / 1571 out tokens · 58714 ms · 2026-05-10T13:15:40.510296+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 76 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Wilczek, Quantum Time Crystals, Phys

    F. Wilczek, Quantum Time Crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 160401 (2012)

  2. [2]

    Bruno, Impossibility of Spontaneously Rotating Time Crystals: A No-Go Theorem, Phys

    P. Bruno, Impossibility of Spontaneously Rotating Time Crystals: A No-Go Theorem, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 070402 (2013)

  3. [3]

    Watanabe and M

    H. Watanabe and M. Oshikawa, Absence of Quantum Time Crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 251603 (2015)

  4. [4]

    Khemani, A

    V. Khemani, A. Lazarides, R. Moessner, and S. L. Sondhi, Phase Structure of Driven Quantum Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 250401 (2016)

  5. [5]

    Khemani, R

    V. Khemani, R. Moessner, and S. L. Sondhi, A Brief History of Time Crystals (2019), arXiv:1910.10745 [cond- mat.str-el]

  6. [6]

    Sacha, Modeling spontaneous breaking of time- translation symmetry, Phys

    K. Sacha, Modeling spontaneous breaking of time- translation symmetry, Phys. Rev. A91, 033617 (2015)

  7. [7]

    Sacha and J

    K. Sacha and J. Zakrzewski, Time crystals: a review, Reports on Progress in Physics81, 016401 (2017)

  8. [8]

    D. V. Else, B. Bauer, and C. Nayak, Floquet Time Crys- tals, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 090402 (2016)

  9. [9]

    D. V. Else, B. Bauer, and C. Nayak, Prethermal Phases of Matter Protected by Time-Translation Symmetry, Phys. Rev. X7, 011026 (2017)

  10. [10]

    D. V. Else, C. Monroe, C. Nayak, and N. Y. Yao, Dis- crete Time Crystals, Annual Review of Condensed Mat- ter Physics11, 467 (2020)

  11. [11]

    C. W. von Keyserlingk, V. Khemani, and S. L. Sondhi, Absolute stability and spatiotemporal long-range order in Floquet systems, Phys. Rev. B94, 085112 (2016)

  12. [12]

    N. Y. Yao, A. C. Potter, I.-D. Potirniche, and A. Vish- wanath, Discrete Time Crystals: Rigidity, Criticality, and Realizations, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 030401 (2017)

  13. [13]

    Lazarides and R

    A. Lazarides and R. Moessner, Fate of a discrete time crystal in an open system, Phys. Rev. B95, 195135 (2017)

  14. [14]

    M. P. Zaletel, M. Lukin, C. Monroe, C. Nayak, F. Wilczek, and N. Y. Yao, Colloquium: Quantum and classical discrete time crystals, Rev. Mod. Phys.95, 031001 (2023)

  15. [15]

    Zhang, P

    J. Zhang, P. W. Hess, A. Kyprianidis, P. Becker, A. Lee, J. Smith, G. Pagano, I. D. Potirniche, A. C. Potter, A. Vishwanath, N. Y. Yao, and C. Monroe, Observation of a discrete time crystal, Nature543, 217 (2017)

  16. [16]

    Seibold, R

    K. Seibold, R. Rota, and V. Savona, Dissipative time crystal in an asymmetric nonlinear photonic dimer, Phys. Rev. A101, 033839 (2020)

  17. [17]

    Lled´ o and M

    C. Lled´ o and M. H. Szyma´ nska, A dissipative time crystal with or without Z2 symmetry breaking, New Journal of Physics22, 075002 (2020)

  18. [18]

    Booker, B

    C. Booker, B. Buˇ ca, and D. Jaksch, Non-stationarity and dissipative time crystals: spectral properties and finite- size effects, New Journal of Physics22, 085007 (2020)

  19. [19]

    Passarelli, P

    G. Passarelli, P. Lucignano, R. Fazio, and A. Russo- manno, Dissipative time crystals with long-range Lind- bladians, Phys. Rev. B106, 224308 (2022)

  20. [20]

    Iemini, A

    F. Iemini, A. Russomanno, J. Keeling, M. Schir` o, M. Dal- monte, and R. Fazio, Boundary Time Crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 035301 (2018)

  21. [21]

    Piccitto, M

    G. Piccitto, M. Wauters, F. Nori, and N. Shammah, Sym- metries and conserved quantities of boundary time crys- tals in generalized spin models, Phys. Rev. B104, 014307 (2021)

  22. [22]

    Mori, Exactness of the mean-field dynamics in optical cavity systems, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2013, P06005 (2013)

    T. Mori, Exactness of the mean-field dynamics in optical cavity systems, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2013, P06005 (2013)

  23. [23]

    Carollo and I

    F. Carollo and I. Lesanovsky, Exactness of Mean-Field Equations for Open Dicke Models with an Application to Pattern Retrieval Dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 230601 (2021)

  24. [24]

    Fiorelli, M

    E. Fiorelli, M. M¨ uller, I. Lesanovsky, and F. Carollo, Mean-field dynamics of open quantum systems with col- 15 lective operator-valued rates: validity and application, New Journal of Physics25, 083010 (2023)

  25. [25]

    Mukherjee, Y

    A. Mukherjee, Y. Ibrahim, M. Hajduˇ sek, and S. Vin- janampathy, Symmetries and correlations in continuous time crystals, Phys. Rev. A110, 012220 (2024)

  26. [26]

    Carollo and I

    F. Carollo and I. Lesanovsky, Exact solution of a bound- ary time-crystal phase transition: Time-translation sym- metry breaking and non-Markovian dynamics of correla- tions, Phys. Rev. A105, L040202 (2022)

  27. [27]

    Nakanishi and T

    Y. Nakanishi and T. Sasamoto, Dissipative time crys- tals originating from parity-time symmetry, Phys. Rev. A107, L010201 (2023)

  28. [28]

    Nemeth, A

    D. Nemeth, A. Principi, and A. Nazir, Analytical solution of boundary time crystals via the superspin basis (2026), arXiv:2507.06998 [quant-ph]

  29. [29]

    Z. Liu, Y. Li, Z. Fei, and X. Wang, Boundary Time Crystals: Beyond Mean-Field Theory (2025), arXiv:2510.03028 [quant-ph]

  30. [30]

    Callaghan,Principles of Nuclear Magnetic Reso- nance Microscopy, Oxford science publications (Claren- don Press, 1993)

    P. Callaghan,Principles of Nuclear Magnetic Reso- nance Microscopy, Oxford science publications (Claren- don Press, 1993)

  31. [31]

    Abragam,The Principles of Nuclear Magnetism, In- ternational series of monographs on physics (Clarendon Press, 1961)

    A. Abragam,The Principles of Nuclear Magnetism, In- ternational series of monographs on physics (Clarendon Press, 1961)

  32. [32]

    Slichter,Principles of Magnetic Resonance, Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences (Springer Berlin Heidel- berg, 1996)

    C. Slichter,Principles of Magnetic Resonance, Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences (Springer Berlin Heidel- berg, 1996)

  33. [33]

    Fano, Description of States in Quantum Mechanics by Density Matrix and Operator Techniques, Rev

    U. Fano, Description of States in Quantum Mechanics by Density Matrix and Operator Techniques, Rev. Mod. Phys.29, 74 (1957)

  34. [34]

    Happer, Optical Pumping, Rev

    W. Happer, Optical Pumping, Rev. Mod. Phys.44, 169 (1972)

  35. [35]

    Blum, Irreducible Components of the Density Matrix, inDensity Matrix Theory and Applications(Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012) pp

    K. Blum, Irreducible Components of the Density Matrix, inDensity Matrix Theory and Applications(Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012) pp. 115–163

  36. [36]

    D. A. Varshalovich, A. N. Moskalev, and V. K. Kher- sonskii,Quantum Theory of Angular Momentum(World Scientific, Singapore, 1988)

  37. [37]

    K. T. Hecht, Spherical Tensor Operators, inQuantum Mechanics(Springer New York, New York, NY, 2000) pp. 294–298

  38. [38]

    C. J. Wood, T. W. Borneman, and D. G. Cory, Cavity cooling of an ensemble spin system, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 050501 (2014)

  39. [39]

    Prosen, Third quantization: a general method to solve master equations for quadratic open Fermi systems, New Journal of Physics10, 043026 (2008)

    T. Prosen, Third quantization: a general method to solve master equations for quadratic open Fermi systems, New Journal of Physics10, 043026 (2008)

  40. [40]

    Prosen and T

    T. Prosen and T. H. Seligman, Quantization over boson operator spaces, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical43, 392004 (2010)

  41. [41]

    D. F. Walls, P. D. Drummond, S. S. Hassan, and H. J. Carmichael, Non-Equilibrium Phase Transitions in Cooperative Atomic Systems, Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement64, 307 (1978), https://academic.oup.com/ptps/article- pdf/doi/10.1143/PTPS.64.307/5292058/64-307.pdf

  42. [42]

    Drummond and H

    P. Drummond and H. Carmichael, Volterra cycles and the cooperative fluorescence critical point, Optics Com- munications27, 160 (1978)

  43. [43]

    P. D. Drummond, Observables and moments of coop- erative resonance fluorescence, Phys. Rev. A22, 1179 (1980)

  44. [44]

    Choi, Completely positive linear maps on complex matrices, Linear Algebra and its Applications10, 285 (1975)

    M.-D. Choi, Completely positive linear maps on complex matrices, Linear Algebra and its Applications10, 285 (1975)

  45. [45]

    Jamio lkowski, Linear transformations which preserve trace and positive semidefiniteness of operators, Reports on Mathematical Physics3, 275 (1972)

    A. Jamio lkowski, Linear transformations which preserve trace and positive semidefiniteness of operators, Reports on Mathematical Physics3, 275 (1972)

  46. [46]

    J. A. Gyamfi, Fundamentals of quantum mechanics in Liouville space, European Journal of Physics41, 063002 (2020)

  47. [47]

    Buˇ ca and T

    B. Buˇ ca and T. Prosen, A note on symmetry reductions of the Lindblad equation: transport in constrained open spin chains, New Journal of Physics14, 073007 (2012)

  48. [48]

    V. V. Albert and L. Jiang, Symmetries and conserved quantities in Lindblad master equations, Phys. Rev. A 89, 022118 (2014)

  49. [49]

    Nakanishi, R

    Y. Nakanishi, R. Hanai, and T. Sasamoto, Continuous time crystals as a PT symmetric state and the emergence of critical exceptional points (2025), arXiv:2406.09018 [quant-ph]

  50. [50]

    M. S. Byrd and N. Khaneja, Characterization of the pos- itivity of the density matrix in terms of the coherence vector representation, Phys. Rev. A68, 062322 (2003)

  51. [51]

    R. A. Bertlmann and P. Krammer, Bloch vectors for qu- dits, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 41, 235303 (2008)

  52. [52]

    M. S. Byrd, C. A. Bishop, and Y.-C. Ou, General open- system quantum evolution in terms of affine maps of the polarization vector, Phys. Rev. A83, 012301 (2011)

  53. [53]

    Kimura, The Bloch vector for N-level systems, Physics Letters A314, 339 (2003)

    G. Kimura, The Bloch vector for N-level systems, Physics Letters A314, 339 (2003)

  54. [54]

    O’Connor, V

    E. O’Connor, V. Montenegro, F. Albarelli, M. G. A. Paris, A. Bayat, and M. G. Genoni, Attaining Quantum Sensing Enhancement from Monitored Dissipative Time Crystals (2026), arXiv:2508.15448 [quant-ph]

  55. [55]

    Jirasek, I

    M. Jirasek, I. Lesanovsky, and A. Cabot, The Bound- ary Time Crystal as a light source for quantum en- hanced sensing beyond the Heisenberg Limit (2025), arXiv:2511.23416 [quant-ph]

  56. [56]

    Kruthoff, J

    J. Kruthoff, J. de Boer, J. van Wezel, C. L. Kane, and R. Slager, Topological Classification of Crystalline In- sulators through Band Structure Combinatorics, Phys. Rev. X7, 041069 (2017)

  57. [57]

    Bradlyn, L

    B. Bradlyn, L. Elcoro, J. Cano, M. G. Vergniory, Z. Wang, C. Felser, M. I. Aroyo, and B. A. Bernevig, Topological quantum chemistry, Nature547, 298 (2017)

  58. [58]

    Slager, A

    R.-J. Slager, A. Mesaros, V. Juriˇ ci´ c, and J. Zaanen, The space group classification of topological band-insulators, Nat. Phys.9, 98 (2013)

  59. [59]

    Bouhon, T

    A. Bouhon, T. Bzdusek, and R. Slager, Geometric ap- proach to fragile topology beyond symmetry indicators, Phys. Rev. B102, 115135 (2020)

  60. [60]

    H. C. Po, A. Vishwanath, and H. Watanabe, Symmetry- based indicators of band topology in the 230 space groups, Nature Communications8, 50 (2017)

  61. [61]

    P. W. Brouwer and V. Dwivedi, Homotopic classifica- tion of band structures: Stable, fragile, delicate, and sta- ble representation-protected topology, Phys. Rev. B108, 155137 (2023)

  62. [62]

    Hatano and D

    N. Hatano and D. R. Nelson, Localization Transitions in Non-Hermitian Quantum Mechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 570 (1996)

  63. [63]

    C. M. Bender, Making sense of non-hermitian Hamilto- nians, Reports on Progress in Physics70, 947 (2007)

  64. [64]

    E. J. Bergholtz, J. C. Budich, and F. K. Kunst, Ex- ceptional topology of non-Hermitian systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 015005 (2021). 16

  65. [65]

    Zhou and J

    H. Zhou and J. Y. Lee, Periodic table for topological bands with non-Hermitian symmetries, Phys. Rev. B99, 235112 (2019)

  66. [66]

    Kawabata, K

    K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, M. Ueda, and M. Sato, Sym- metry and Topology in Non-Hermitian Physics, Phys. Rev. X9, 041015 (2019)

  67. [67]

    D. S. Borgnia, A. J. Kruchkov, and R.-J. Slager, Non- Hermitian Boundary Modes and Topology, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 056802 (2020)

  68. [68]

    Okuma, K

    N. Okuma, K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, and M. Sato, Topological Origin of Non-Hermitian Skin Effects, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 086801 (2020)

  69. [69]

    Nemeth, A

    D. Nemeth, A. Nazir, A. Principi, and R.-J. Slager, Topological Boundary Time Crystal Oscillations (2026), arXiv:2602.17765 [quant-ph]

  70. [70]

    Prosen and I

    T. Prosen and I. Piˇ zorn, Operator space entanglement entropy in a transverse Ising chain, Phys. Rev. A76, 032316 (2007)

  71. [71]

    Nahum, S

    A. Nahum, S. Vijay, and J. Haah, Operator Spreading in Random Unitary Circuits, Phys. Rev. X8, 021014 (2018)

  72. [72]

    C. W. von Keyserlingk, T. Rakovszky, F. Pollmann, and S. L. Sondhi, Operator Hydrodynamics, OTOCs, and Entanglement Growth in Systems without Conservation Laws, Phys. Rev. X8, 021013 (2018)

  73. [73]

    Khemani, A

    V. Khemani, A. Vishwanath, and D. A. Huse, Oper- ator Spreading and the Emergence of Dissipative Hy- drodynamics under Unitary Evolution with Conservation Laws, Phys. Rev. X8, 031057 (2018)

  74. [74]

    D. E. Parker, X. Cao, A. Avdoshkin, T. Scaffidi, and E. Altman, A Universal Operator Growth Hypothesis, Phys. Rev. X9, 041017 (2019)

  75. [75]

    Omanakuttan, K

    S. Omanakuttan, K. Chinni, P. D. Blocher, and P. M. Poggi, Scrambling and quantum chaos indicators from long-time properties of operator distributions, Phys. Rev. A107, 032418 (2023)

  76. [76]

    Ribeiro and T

    P. Ribeiro and T. Prosen, Integrable Quantum Dynamics of Open Collective Spin Models, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 010401 (2019)