pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.14516 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-16 · 🪐 quant-ph

Linear Optical Schemes to Postselect High-Dimensional Dicke States

Daniel Bhatti , William J. Munro , Seungbeom Chin This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 12:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords linear opticspostselectionDicke statesquditsancillary photonsmultipartite entanglementsuccess probabilityphoton interference
0
0 comments X

The pith

Linear optical schemes using ancillary photons can postselect high-dimensional symmetric qudit Dicke states with success probabilities exceeding the bound for schemes without ancillas.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a family of linear optical interference setups that postselect symmetric qudit Dicke states through photon detection patterns. It compares versions with and without ancillary photons and shows that the ancillary versions achieve higher success probabilities than the theoretical upper limit for the non-ancillary versions. This matters because Dicke states serve as resources for distributed quantum tasks, and postselection offers a practical route to generating them without needing heralded detection. The schemes are framed broadly enough to apply across many different linear optical configurations.

Core claim

The authors introduce linear optical schemes for postselecting symmetric qudit Dicke states, both with and without ancillary photons, and prove that the use of ancillary photons enables success probabilities exceeding the upper bound applicable to non-ancillary schemes, while the schemes are general enough to cover a wide range of interference setups.

What carries the argument

A family of postselection schemes based on linear optical interference of photons, where ancillary photons add degrees of freedom that raise the probability of detecting the desired symmetric state pattern.

If this is right

  • Multiple distinct linear optical arrangements become available for generating the same target Dicke state.
  • Success rates for postselecting these multipartite entangled states can be raised beyond previously established limits.
  • Dicke states become more accessible as resources for quantum communication protocols and variational quantum algorithms.
  • The approach extends to a broad class of interference setups without requiring specialized hardware beyond standard linear optics.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Ancillary photons may serve as a general tactic for raising postselection efficiencies in other photonic entanglement generation tasks.
  • The number of ancillary photons could be optimized per state dimension to balance success rate against experimental overhead.
  • Similar postselection boosts might apply to related symmetric states used in quantum error correction or distributed sensing.

Load-bearing premise

The linear optical interference and postselection process can be modeled and implemented with ideal unitary transformations and perfect photon indistinguishability, without accounting for realistic losses or mode mismatches that would degrade the postselected state.

What would settle it

Measure the success probability in an experimental realization of one of the ancillary-photon schemes and check whether it exceeds the calculated upper bound for the matching no-ancilla scheme under the same photon number and dimension.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.14516 by Daniel Bhatti, Seungbeom Chin, William J. Munro.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: A linear operator that generates |D {2,2} 4 ⟩ with four particles. Two red particles in the first and second modes are in the internal state |0⟩ and the other blue ones in |1⟩. All the particles are spread into all four output modes by the transformation operator T. We can easily check that the postselected final state is indeed the Dicke state using the linear quantum graph picture introduced in Ref. [30,… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Right: Scheme to postselect qudit Dicke states [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Setup to postselect qudit Dicke states with ancil [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Maximum postselection probabilities for a) Qubits, and b) Qutrits. Black (dashed) lines: no ancillary photons, ideal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Contour plots of the differences between the linear optical schemes without ancillary photons and the linear optical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Linear optical scheme with only beam splitters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Multipartite entanglement is an essential quantum resource for various distributed quantum applications. One promising method for preparing multipartite entanglement is to interfere independent photons at linear optical interference setups. While heralding the successful interference and thereby the state generation is often costly, postselecting entangled states provides an achievable alternative in this framework. We introduce a family of interference schemes for postselecting symmetric qudit Dicke states, useful resources in quantum communication and variational quantum computing. We present schemes with and without ancillary photons and show that using ancillary photons can exceed the upper bound on the success probability of schemes without ancillary photons. Our results accommodate a wide range of linear optical schemes, providing multiple viable approaches for postselecting Dicke states.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a family of linear-optical interference schemes for postselecting symmetric qudit Dicke states. It presents both ancilla-free and ancilla-assisted constructions and claims that ancillary photons enable success probabilities exceeding an upper bound that holds for all ancilla-free schemes, all within the ideal model of unitary linear optics and perfect photon indistinguishability.

Significance. If the bound derivation and explicit constructions hold, the work supplies concrete, higher-efficiency routes to multipartite entanglement generation on a practical platform. This is relevant for quantum communication protocols and variational algorithms that rely on symmetric Dicke states, and the uniform ideal-model comparison provides a clear benchmark.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section presenting the ancilla-free bound] The derivation of the upper bound on success probability for ancilla-free schemes must be shown explicitly (including the precise assumptions on the number of photons, modes, and postselection conditions) so that the claim of generality can be verified; this is load-bearing for the central comparative result.
  2. [Section on ancilla-assisted constructions] The ancilla-assisted schemes require explicit unitary matrices or beam-splitter networks together with the postselection probability calculation to confirm they exceed the bound; without these, the numerical improvement cannot be independently checked.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and introduction] Clarify the range of qudit dimensions d and total photon numbers for which the schemes and bound apply.
  2. [Discussion or conclusion] Add a brief discussion of how the ideal-model results translate to realistic conditions (losses, distinguishability) even if only qualitatively.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments. We address each major point below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested explicit details.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Section presenting the ancilla-free bound] The derivation of the upper bound on success probability for ancilla-free schemes must be shown explicitly (including the precise assumptions on the number of photons, modes, and postselection conditions) so that the claim of generality can be verified; this is load-bearing for the central comparative result.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit derivation is necessary for independent verification. In the revised manuscript we will expand the relevant section with a complete step-by-step derivation of the upper bound, explicitly stating the assumptions on photon number, mode count, and postselection conditions under which the bound holds for all ancilla-free linear-optical schemes. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Section on ancilla-assisted constructions] The ancilla-assisted schemes require explicit unitary matrices or beam-splitter networks together with the postselection probability calculation to confirm they exceed the bound; without these, the numerical improvement cannot be independently checked.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the current presentation lacks sufficient explicit detail for verification. In the revised manuscript we will supply the explicit unitary matrices (or equivalent beam-splitter decompositions) for each ancilla-assisted construction, together with the full postselection probability calculations that demonstrate the improvement over the ancilla-free bound. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper derives an upper bound on postselection success probability for ancilla-free linear-optical schemes and explicitly constructs ancilla-assisted schemes whose probabilities exceed that bound. Both the bound and the constructions are obtained from direct calculation of unitary interference and postselection probabilities in the ideal model of perfect photon indistinguishability; no parameters are fitted to data and then relabeled as predictions, no result is defined in terms of itself, and no load-bearing premise reduces to a self-citation. The comparison therefore remains internal to a single, externally verifiable mathematical framework and does not collapse by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard domain assumptions of linear quantum optics and postselection; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Linear optical elements implement unitary transformations on photon Fock states according to standard quantum optics.
    Invoked implicitly for all interference schemes described.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5413 in / 1161 out tokens · 32400 ms · 2026-05-10T12:04:27.258182+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    1|{z} k1 . . .(d−1). . .(d−1)| {z } kd−1 ⟩, (1) whereS {k} N denotes the symmetric group that permutes the order of qudit states without multiple counting. Dicke states have been shown to be useful in different applications. First, Dicke states are a natural benchmark for studying entanglement under particle loss, since their permutation symmetry and fixe...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    We postselect the cases when each mode in the main system receives exactly one particle and the ancillary mode receivesKparticles

    1 √ N K d−1Y j=1 1p kj!( NX mj =1 ˆb† mj ,j)kj |vac⟩, (18) where ˆb† j,s and ˆs† s denote particles in theNoutput system modes and one ancillary mode respectively. We postselect the cases when each mode in the main system receives exactly one particle and the ancillary mode receivesKparticles. Then the final state is given 5 by αN−K βKQd−1 j=1 kj! √ N KqQ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    1|{z} k1 ⟩,(29) withk 0/1 photons in|0/1⟩,N=k 0 +k 1, andK=k 1

    work page

  4. [4]

    Without Ancillary Photons As discussed in Section III B, sending all photons into the same mode of a symmetric multiport beam splitter, one can postselect a symmetric qubit Dicke state with a success probability ofp N,{k0,k1} =N!/N N [see Eq. (10)]. However, when starting from single-photon input states, this success probability will decrease. Note that t...

    work page

  5. [5]

    (28)]: ˜p(max) {k},ancilla = N!k 1! k0! kk0 0 kk1 1 N N+2k 1 k1! kk1 1 N.(32)

    With Ancillary Photons Starting from single-photon input states, the linear op- tical scheme with ancillary photons [see Section IV] yields the following success probability for qubits [see Eq. (28)]: ˜p(max) {k},ancilla = N!k 1! k0! kk0 0 kk1 1 N N+2k 1 k1! kk1 1 N.(32)

    work page

  6. [6]

    (30) and (31)], we plot the respective probabilities for differentk 1 ≤k 0 in Fig

    Comparison To compare this result with the linear optical schemes without using ancillary photons [see Eqs. (30) and (31)], we plot the respective probabilities for differentk 1 ≤k 0 in Fig. 4a). Furthermore, we plot contour plots of the differences between the schemes in Fig. 5a) for up to k1 = 20. We find that forN≲(2.411±0.005)k 1 + (0.699±0.056) the a...

    work page

  7. [7]

    2|{z} k2 ⟩,(33) withk 0/1/2 photons in|0/1/2⟩,N=k 0 +k 1 +k 2, and K=k 1 +k 2

    work page

  8. [8]

    Without Ancillary Photons Again, by sending allNphotons into the same mode of a symmetricN-port splitter, one can postselect a sym- metric qutrit Dicke state with a success probability of pN,{k0,k1,k2} =N!/N N [see Eq. (10)]. The reduced suc- cess probabilities starting from single photon input states are given by [see Eq. (14)] ˜pN,{k} = N!k 0!k1!k2! N 2...

    work page

  9. [9]

    (28)]: ˜p(max) {k},ancilla = N!(k 1 +k 2)! k0! kk0 0 (k1 +k 2)k1+k2 N N+2(k 1+k2) k1!k2! kk1 1 kk2 2 N

    With Ancillary Photons Starting from single-photon input states, the linear op- tical scheme for qutrits and with ancillary photons [see Section IV] gives [see Eq. (28)]: ˜p(max) {k},ancilla = N!(k 1 +k 2)! k0! kk0 0 (k1 +k 2)k1+k2 N N+2(k 1+k2) k1!k2! kk1 1 kk2 2 N. (36)

    work page

  10. [10]

    Comparison To compare this result with the schemes for post- selecting qutrit Dicke states without ancillas, we plot the corresponding probabilities for differentk 1 =k 2 in Fig. 4b). Additionally, in Fig. 5b), we plot the contour plots of the differences of the different schemes for up to k1 =k 2 = 10. Similarly to the qubit case, we find that for smallN...

    work page

  11. [11]

    Y. Wang, Z. Hu, B. C. Sanders, and S. Kais, Qudits and High-Dimensional Quantum Computing, Front. Phys.8, 589504 (2020)

    work page 2020

  12. [12]

    Erhard, M

    M. Erhard, M. Krenn, and A. Zeilinger, Advances in high-dimensional quantum entanglement, Nat. Rev. Phys.2, 365 (2020)

    work page 2020

  13. [13]

    Friis, G

    N. Friis, G. Vitagliano, M. Malik, and M. Huber, En- tanglement certification from theory to experiment, Nat. Rev. Phys.1, 72 (2019)

    work page 2019

  14. [14]

    S. Goel, S. Leedumrongwatthanakun, N. H. Valencia, W. McCutcheon, A. Tavakoli, C. Conti, P. W. H. Pinkse, and M. Malik, Inverse design of high-dimensional quan- tum optical circuits in a complex medium, Nat. Phys.20, 232 (2024)

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    Murta, F

    G. Murta, F. Grasselli, H. Kampermann, and D. Bruß, Quantum conference key agreement: A review, Advanced Quantum Technologies3, 2000025 (2020)

    work page 2020

  16. [16]

    S. Chin, J. Ryu, and Y.-S. Kim, Exponentially en- hanced scheme for the heralded qudit Greenberger- Horne-Zeilinger state in linear optics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 253601 (2024)

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    Bhatti and S

    D. Bhatti and S. Barz, Heralding higher-dimensional Bell and Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger states using multiport splitters, New Journal of Physics27, 033006 (2025). 10

    work page 2025

  18. [18]

    R. H. Dicke, Coherence in spontaneous radiation pro- cesses, Phys. Rev.93, 99 (1954)

    work page 1954

  19. [19]

    Kiesel, C

    N. Kiesel, C. Schmid, G. T´ oth, E. Solano, and H. We- infurter, Experimental observation of four-photon entan- gled Dicke state with high fidelity, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 063604 (2007)

    work page 2007

  20. [20]

    Wei and P

    T.-C. Wei and P. M. Goldbart, Geometric measure of en- tanglement and applications to bipartite and multipartite quantum states, Phys. Rev. A68, 042307 (2003)

    work page 2003

  21. [21]

    Zhang, Z

    W. Zhang, Z. Han, F. Shi, and X. Zhang, New construc- tions of multipartite entanglement resistant to particle loss, arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.06567 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    J.-T. Wang, G. Xu, X.-B. Chen, X.-M. Sun, and H.-Y. Jia, Local distinguishability of Dicke states in quantum secret sharing, Physics Letters A381, 998 (2017)

    work page 2017

  23. [23]

    Lipinska, G

    V. Lipinska, G. Murta, and S. Wehner, Anonymous transmission in a noisy quantum network using theW state, Phys. Rev. A98, 052320 (2018)

    work page 2018

  24. [24]

    Grasselli, H

    F. Grasselli, H. Kampermann, and D. Bruß, Confer- ence key agreement with single-photon interference, New Journal of Physics21, 123002 (2019)

    work page 2019

  25. [25]

    Li, W.-C

    G.-D. Li, W.-C. Cheng, Q.-L. Wang, L. Cheng, Y. Mao, and H.-Y. Jia, Enhanced quantum secret sharing protocol for anonymous secure communication utilizing W states, iScience27, 109836 (2024)

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    Prevedel, G

    R. Prevedel, G. Cronenberg, M. S. Tame, M. Paternostro, P. Walther, M. S. Kim, and A. Zeilinger, Experimental realization of Dicke states of up to six qubits for multi- party quantum networking, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 020503 (2009)

    work page 2009

  27. [27]

    Miguel-Ramiro, F

    J. Miguel-Ramiro, F. Riera-S` abat, and W. D¨ ur, Quan- tum repeater forWstates, PRX Quantum4, 040323 (2023)

    work page 2023

  28. [28]

    W. Roga, R. Ikuta, T. Horikiri, and M. Takeoka, Efficient Dicke-state distribution in a network of lossy channels, Phys. Rev. A108, 012612 (2023)

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    Illiano, M

    J. Illiano, M. Caleffi, M. Viscardi, and A. S. Cacciapuoti, Quantum mac: Genuine entanglement access control via many-body Dicke states, IEEE Transactions on Commu- nications72, 2090 (2024)

    work page 2090

  30. [30]

    Brandhofer, D

    S. Brandhofer, D. Braun, V. Dehn, G. Hellstern, M. H¨ uls, Y. Ji, I. Polian, A. S. Bhatia, and T. Wellens, Bench- marking the performance of portfolio optimization with QAOA, Quantum Information Processing22, 25 (2022)

    work page 2022

  31. [31]

    Wieczorek, R

    W. Wieczorek, R. Krischek, N. Kiesel, P. Michelberger, G. T´ oth, and H. Weinfurter, Experimental entanglement of a six-photon symmetric Dicke state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 020504 (2009)

    work page 2009

  32. [32]

    L. Chen, L. Lu, L. Xia, Y. Lu, S. Zhu, and X.-s. Ma, On- chip generation and collectively coherent control of the superposition of the whole family of Dicke states, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 223601 (2023)

    work page 2023

  33. [33]

    Kiesel, W

    N. Kiesel, W. Wieczorek, S. Krins, T. Bastin, H. Wein- furter, and E. Solano, Operational multipartite entangle- ment classes for symmetric photonic qubit states, Phys. Rev. A81, 032316 (2010)

    work page 2010

  34. [34]

    Maser, R

    A. Maser, R. Wiegner, U. Schilling, C. Thiel, and J. von Zanthier, Versatile source of polarization-entangled pho- tons, Phys. Rev. A81, 053842 (2010)

    work page 2010

  35. [35]

    Kasture, Scalable approach to generation of large sym- metric Dicke states, Phys

    S. Kasture, Scalable approach to generation of large sym- metric Dicke states, Phys. Rev. A97, 043862 (2018)

    work page 2018

  36. [36]

    X. Gu, L. Chen, A. Zeilinger, and M. Krenn, Quantum experiments and graphs. III. high-dimensional and mul- tiparticle entanglement, Phys. Rev. A99, 032338 (2019)

    work page 2019

  37. [37]

    P. Zhu, S. Xue, Q. Zheng, C. Wu, X. Yu, Y. Wang, Y. Liu, X. Qiang, M. Deng, J. Wu, and P. Xu, Reconfigurable multiphoton entangled states based on quantum photonic chips, Opt. Express28, 26792 (2020)

    work page 2020

  38. [38]

    Y. L. Lim and A. Beige, Multiphoton entanglement through a Bell-multiport beam splitter, Phys. Rev. A71, 062311 (2005)

    work page 2005

  39. [39]

    Kim, Y.-W

    Y.-S. Kim, Y.-W. Cho, H.-T. Lim, and S.-W. Han, Effi- cient linear optical generation of a multipartiteWstate via a quantum eraser, Phys. Rev. A101, 022337 (2020)

    work page 2020

  40. [40]

    Chin, Y.-S

    S. Chin, Y.-S. Kim, and S. Lee, Graph picture of linear quantum networks and entanglement, Quantum5, 611 (2021)

    work page 2021

  41. [41]

    M. Kang, J. Kim, W. J. Munro, S. Chin, and J. Huh, Heralded linear optical generation of Dicke states, arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.20881 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    Knill, R

    E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and G. J. Milburn, A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics, Nature 409, 46 (2001)

    work page 2001

  43. [43]

    Scheel, K

    S. Scheel, K. Nemoto, W. J. Munro, and P. L. Knight, Measurement-induced nonlinearity in linear optics, Phys. Rev. A68, 032310 (2003)

    work page 2003

  44. [44]

    Chin, Y.-S

    S. Chin, Y.-S. Kim, and M. Karczewski, Shortcut to multipartite entanglement generation: A graph approach to boson subtractions, npj Quantum Information10, 67 (2024)

    work page 2024

  45. [45]

    Zhang, N

    X. Zhang, N. Wang, Z. Tian, Q. Liu, and Y. Gu, Deterministic generation of large Fock states in cou- pled optical-optomechanical cavities, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 033158 (2025)

    work page 2025

  46. [46]

    Blasiak and M

    P. Blasiak and M. Markiewicz, Entangling three qubits without ever touching, Scientific Reports9, 20131 (2019)

    work page 2019

  47. [47]

    Chiuri, G

    A. Chiuri, G. Vallone, N. Bruno, C. Macchiavello, D. Bruß, and P. Mataloni, Hyperentangled mixed phased Dicke states: Optical design and detection, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 250501 (2010)

    work page 2010

  48. [48]

    Li, Y.-G

    Z. Li, Y.-G. Han, H.-F. Sun, J. Shang, and H. Zhu, Verifi- cation of phased Dicke states, Phys. Rev. A103, 022601 (2021)

    work page 2021

  49. [49]

    Chin, Creating highly symmetric qudit heralded entan- glement through highly symmetric graphs, arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.05273 (2024)

    S. Chin, Creating highly symmetric qudit heralded entan- glement through highly symmetric graphs, arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.05273 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024