pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.15110 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-16 · 🪐 quant-ph · hep-ph

General Static Solutions of the SU(2) Yang-Mills Equations from a Spin Vector Potential

Yu-Xuan Zhang , Jing-Ling Chen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 11:00 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph hep-ph
keywords SU(2) Yang-Mills equationsstatic solutionsspin vector potentialangular momentum algebragauge field ansatznon-Abelian gauge theoryconsistency equations
0
0 comments X

The pith

A spin-operator ansatz derived from angular momentum constraints classifies all static solutions to the source-free SU(2) Yang-Mills equations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that the vector potential extraction approach, which enforces the standard angular momentum algebra on the combined orbital-plus-spin operator, produces the most general form of a spin-dependent gauge potential for static configurations. Substituting the resulting ansatz into the Yang-Mills equations generates a set of consistency conditions whose solutions fall into distinct real and complex families. This procedure recovers every previously known simple static solution as a special case while identifying additional configurations. The classification supplies explicit functional forms for both the vector potential and the scalar potential that depend on three constants and two radial functions.

Core claim

By requiring the total angular momentum to satisfy the usual commutation relations, the vector potential extraction approach yields the general static ansatz A = [k1 (r-hat × Γ) + k2 Γ + k3 (Γ · r-hat) r-hat]/r together with phi = f1(r)(Γ · r-hat) + f2(r). Insertion into the source-free SU(2) Yang-Mills equations produces algebraic and differential consistency relations that are solved completely, furnishing both real and complex families of solutions.

What carries the argument

The vector potential extraction approach (VPEA), which fixes the most general spin-dependent form of the static gauge potential by imposing the standard angular-momentum algebra on the total (orbital plus spin) operator.

If this is right

  • All previously known simple static SU(2) solutions appear as special cases of the general classification.
  • New real and complex static configurations are explicitly constructed that had not been reported before.
  • The solutions provide concrete starting points for non-perturbative analyses of SU(2) gauge theory.
  • The same functional forms can be used in models that couple spin degrees of freedom to non-Abelian gauge fields.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method could be adapted to other compact gauge groups by replacing the SU(2) generators with the appropriate representation of spin operators.
  • Stability analysis or small-oscillation studies around the newly found solutions would test whether they remain viable under time-dependent perturbations.
  • The complex family may furnish Euclidean continuations useful for semiclassical tunneling calculations in Yang-Mills theory.

Load-bearing premise

The total angular momentum operator formed from orbital and spin parts obeys the standard commutation relations that define angular momentum.

What would settle it

Existence of a static, source-free SU(2) Yang-Mills solution whose gauge potential cannot be written in the three-constant, two-radial-function ansatz obtained from the angular-momentum constraint.

read the original abstract

We present a systematic study of static solutions to the source-free SU(2) Yang-Mills equations, in which the gauge potential explicitly depends on spin operators. By employing the \emph{vector potential extraction approach} (VPEA) -- which requires the total angular momentum operator (orbital plus spin) to satisfy the standard angular momentum algebra -- we derive the most general form of the spin vector potential. This leads to the static ansatz $\{ \vec{A} = [k_1(\hat{r}\times\vec{\Gamma}) + k_2\vec{\Gamma} + k_3(\vec{\Gamma}\cdot\hat{r})\hat{r}]/r, \varphi = f_1(r)\,(\vec{\Gamma}\cdot\hat{r}) + f_2(r)\}$, parametrized by three constants $\{k_1, k_2, k_3\}$ and two radial functions $\{f_1(r), f_2(r)\}$. Substituting this ansatz into the Yang-Mills equations and imposing the angular momentum constraints from the VPEA yields a set of consistency equations. Solving these equations provides a complete classification of static solutions, including both real and complex families. Known simple SU(2) static solutions are recovered as special cases. Our classification reveals new static configurations that could be valuable for non-perturbative studies and for models where spin degrees of freedom couple to non-Abelian gauge fields.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims to derive the most general static ansatz for the SU(2) Yang-Mills gauge potential and scalar field using the vector potential extraction approach (VPEA), which imposes that the total angular momentum J = L + S obeys the standard su(2) algebra. The ansatz is A = [k1 (r̂ × Γ) + k2 Γ + k3 (Γ · r̂) r̂]/r and ϕ = f1(r)(Γ · r̂) + f2(r), parametrized by constants k1,k2,k3 and radial functions f1(r),f2(r). Substituting the ansatz into the source-free Yang-Mills equations and solving the resulting consistency conditions is asserted to yield a complete classification of static solutions, including new real and complex families, while recovering known simple solutions as special cases.

Significance. If the results hold, the work would provide a systematic classification of static SU(2) Yang-Mills configurations that incorporate explicit spin dependence, potentially useful for non-perturbative studies and models coupling spin to non-Abelian gauge fields. The recovery of known solutions as special cases offers a partial internal consistency check, and the identification of new configurations could be of value if the ansatz is rigorously justified.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract (ansatz derivation and substitution step)] The VPEA derivation of the ansatz (as stated in the abstract) requires that the total angular momentum operator satisfies the standard algebra [Ji, Jj] = i εijk Jk. The manuscript does not report an a-posteriori verification that this algebra continues to hold identically for the solutions of the consistency equations, especially the new real and complex families. This assumption is load-bearing for the claim that the ansatz is the most general form and that the classification is complete; without the check, the consistency conditions may be incomplete or extraneous.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The symbol Γ appearing in the ansatz is not defined in the provided abstract; an explicit statement of its relation to the spin operator would aid clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and for highlighting this important point about the angular momentum algebra. We address the comment in detail below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The VPEA derivation of the ansatz (as stated in the abstract) requires that the total angular momentum operator satisfies the standard algebra [Ji, Jj] = i εijk Jk. The manuscript does not report an a-posteriori verification that this algebra continues to hold identically for the solutions of the consistency equations, especially the new real and complex families. This assumption is load-bearing for the claim that the ansatz is the most general form and that the classification is complete; without the check, the consistency conditions may be incomplete or extraneous.

    Authors: The vector potential extraction approach (VPEA) derives the ansatz by imposing that the total angular momentum operator J = L + S satisfies the standard su(2) algebra from the outset. This requirement fixes the general operator structure of the gauge potential in terms of the spin operators Γ, yielding the stated form with parameters k1, k2, k3 and radial functions f1(r), f2(r). Because the algebra is enforced at the level of the operator ansatz itself, it holds identically for any values of these parameters and functions; the subsequent consistency equations obtained by substituting into the source-free Yang-Mills equations constrain only the dynamics (i.e., which specific k_i and f_i solve the equations of motion) and do not modify the commutation relations. Consequently, the algebra is preserved by construction for all solutions, including the new real and complex families. We acknowledge that an explicit statement of this fact would improve clarity. In the revised manuscript we will add a short paragraph in Section II clarifying that the su(2) algebra is preserved independently of the consistency conditions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained via independent YM equations

full rationale

The paper derives an ansatz for the static spin vector potential via the VPEA method, which imposes the standard angular momentum algebra [J_i, J_j] = i ε_ijk J_k on the total J = L + S. This ansatz is then substituted into the source-free SU(2) Yang-Mills equations, producing a set of consistency equations on the constants k_i and radial functions f_i(r). These equations are solved to classify solutions, recovering known cases as special instances. No step reduces by construction to the input ansatz or algebra assumption; the classification content arises from solving the independent nonlinear PDEs rather than tautological renaming or fitting. No self-citations, uniqueness theorems from prior author work, or fitted predictions are quoted that would force the output to match the inputs. The approach is self-contained against the YM dynamics under the stated constraints.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests primarily on the VPEA assumption that total angular momentum satisfies standard algebra; the ansatz parameters and radial functions are determined by solving the resulting equations rather than being freely fitted.

free parameters (2)
  • k1, k2, k3
    Three constants parametrizing the general spin vector potential in the derived ansatz.
  • f1(r), f2(r)
    Two radial functions whose forms are fixed by solving the consistency equations from the Yang-Mills system.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The total angular momentum operator (orbital plus spin) satisfies the standard angular momentum algebra.
    This is the defining requirement of the vector potential extraction approach used to derive the most general spin vector potential form.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5559 in / 1545 out tokens · 62994 ms · 2026-05-10T11:00:24.236344+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    displacement

    The General Form of ⃗L=F( ⃗ℓ, ⃗S) Frankly speaking, the expression of (249) is obtained by a simple “displacement” (i.e., ⃗L= ⃗ℓ+ ⃗S), which is merely a simple realization of ⃗L=F( ⃗ℓ, ⃗S). Based on two facts: (i) ⃗ℓand ⃗Lare angular momentum operator, and (ii) the operator ⃗Lis generated from the operator ⃗ℓ, thus the other way to construct ⃗Lis to intro...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Extracting General Spin Vector Potential from ⃗L=F( ⃗ℓ, ⃗S) From previous section, we have known that the general solutions of the angular momentum operator ⃗L=F( ⃗ℓ, ⃗S) are given by ⃗L=F( ⃗ℓ, ⃗S) = ⃗ℓ+a 1 ⃗S+a 2(⃗S·ˆr)ˆr+a3(ˆr×⃗S),(326) withsolution 1as{a 1 = 1, a2 = 0, a3 = 0}andsolution 2as{a 2 =−a 1,(a 1 −1) 2 +a 2 3 = 1}. Let us denote ⃗L= ⃗ℓ+q ⃗G,(...

    work page

  3. [3]

    displacement

    Discussion In the previous subsection, we have studied the spin vector potential from the viewpoint of angular momentum operator. To deepen understanding this topic, in this subsection, let us study the spin vector potential from the viewpoint of linear momentum operator. As before, we restrict our discussion on spin-1/2 case. Discussion 1: The Gauge Tran...

    work page

  4. [4]

    We need ⃗∇ × ⃗B−i g ℏc h φ, ⃗E i + ⃗A× ⃗B+ ⃗B× ⃗A = 0 (416) For the vector identity, due to symmetry, we only need to verify thez-component

    Checking the Equation of the Magnetic-like Field Let us first check (411b). We need ⃗∇ × ⃗B−i g ℏc h φ, ⃗E i + ⃗A× ⃗B+ ⃗B× ⃗A = 0 (416) For the vector identity, due to symmetry, we only need to verify thez-component. The individual terms are calculated as follows: (i) Consider the magnetic field commutator term: ⃗A× ⃗B+ ⃗B× ⃗A z = [Ax, By]−[A y, Bx].(417)...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Checking the Equation of the Electric-like Field We now verify Eq. (411a). (i) The divergence term: ⃗E=−ˆrf ′ 2(r)− f1(r) r 1− 2gk1 ℏc ⃗Γ− f ′ 1(r)− f1(r) r 1− 2gk1 ℏc (⃗Γ·ˆr)ˆr−2gk2f1(r) ℏcr ˆr×⃗Γ ,(462) where for convenience, we have denotef ′ j(r) = ∂fj(r) ∂r , (j= 1,2). We can have ∇ · ⃗E=∇ · −ˆrf′ 2 (r)− f1 (r) r 1− 2gk1 ℏc ⃗Γ− f ′ 1 (r)− f1 (r) r 1−...

    work page

  6. [6]

    The Case of ⃗A(1) In this subsection, let us consider the spin vector potential ofsolution 1, for which {a1 = 1, a2 = 0, a3 = 0}.(483) Here we only consider the non-trivial case ofg̸= 0 (for the special case ofg= 0, we shall make a uniformly treatment in behind). Then in terms{ ⃗Γ,ˆr}the spin vector potential can be written as ⃗A(1) ≡ ⃗A= 1 r h k1(ˆr×⃗Γ) ...

    work page

  7. [7]

    general” spin vector potential is given by ⃗A= 1 r h k1(ˆr×⃗Γ) +k 2⃗Γ +k 3ˆr(⃗Γ·ˆr) i .(513) For the “general

    The Case of ⃗A(2) In this subsection, let us consider the spin vector potential ofsolution 2, for which {a2 =−a 1,(a 1 −1) 2 +a 2 3 = 1}.(492) Similarly, here we only consider the non-trivial case ofg̸= 0. There are two special cases for Eq. (492). The first one {a1 = 2, a2 =−2, a 3 = 0}.(493) The second one is {a1 = 0, a2 = 0, a3 = 0}.(494) (i) The case ...

    work page

  8. [8]

    (514)-(517) we have f ′′ 1 (r) + 2 r f ′ 1(r)− 2f1(r) r2 = 0,(518) k2 +k 3 = 0.(519) Then we have f1(r) = C2 r2 +C 3r,(520) withk 2 =−k 3

    The Case of{g= 0, k 1 = 0} In this case, from Eqs. (514)-(517) we have f ′′ 1 (r) + 2 r f ′ 1(r)− 2f1(r) r2 = 0,(518) k2 +k 3 = 0.(519) Then we have f1(r) = C2 r2 +C 3r,(520) withk 2 =−k 3. HereC 2 andC 3 can be arbitrary real and complex numbers. Remark37.For convenience to build Tables II and III in Sec. VI, let us list the real and complex static solut...

    work page

  9. [9]

    (514)-(517) we have f ′′ 1 (r) + 2 r f ′ 1(r)− 2f1(r) r2 = 0,(523) 2 r3 k1 = 0,(524) k2 +k 3 = 0.(525) However, sincek 1 ̸= 0, then Eq

    The Case of{g= 0, k 1 ̸= 0} In this case, from Eqs. (514)-(517) we have f ′′ 1 (r) + 2 r f ′ 1(r)− 2f1(r) r2 = 0,(523) 2 r3 k1 = 0,(524) k2 +k 3 = 0.(525) However, sincek 1 ̸= 0, then Eq. (524) cannot be valid. Therefore, no solution for the case of{g= 0, k 1 ̸= 0}. 59

    work page

  10. [10]

    The Case of{g̸= 0, k 1 = 0} In this case, from Eqs. (514)-(517) we have 4 κ r2 −2κk2 2 f1(r) +f ′′ 1 (r) + 2 r f ′ 1(r)− 2f1(r) r2 = 0,(526) − 2 r3 κ 2k2 2 +k 2k3 + 2κf2 1 (r) r + 2κ r3 h −(k 2 +k 3)2 i = 0,(527) − k2 +k 3 r3 − 4κ2k2f2 1 (r) r + 2κ r3 [k2 (−2κk2k3) + 2κk2 (k2 +k 3) (2k2 +k 3)] = 0,(528) 3 (k2 +k 3) r3 + 4κ2k2f2 1 (r) r + 2κ r3 [−k2 (−2κk2...

    work page

  11. [11]

    The Case of{g̸= 0, k 1 ̸= 0} In this case, from Eqs. (514)-(517) we have 4 κ r2 k1 −2κk 2 1 −2κk 2 2 f1(r) +f ′′ 1 (r) + 2 r f ′ 1(r)− 2f1(r) r2 (1−2κk 1) = 0,(580) − 2 r3 κ k2 1 + 2k2 2 +k 2k3 −k 1 + 2κf2 1 (r) r (1−2κk 1) +2κ r3 h k1 (2k1 (κk1 −1)−2κk 2k3) + (k2 +k 3)2 (2κk1 −1) + 2κk 1k2 (k2 +k 3) i = 0,(581) k2 +k 3 r3 (2κk1 −1)− 4κ2k2f2 1 (r) r +2κ r...

    work page

  12. [12]

    + 4κ2k3 (2k2 +k 3) = 0,(668) i.e., (k2 +k 3) (2κk1 −1) +k 2 4κ(κk2 1 −k 1 +κk 2

    work page

  13. [13]

    (ii-2) IfC̸= 0, after substituting Eq

    + 4κ2k2 2 + 4κ2k3 (2k2 +k 3) = 0,(669) i.e., (k2 +k 3) (2κk1 −1) +k 2 −1 + 4κ2(k2 +k 3)2 = 0,(670) which is the constraint amongk 1,k 2 andk 3, withk 2 ̸= 0,k 2 +k 3 ̸= 0 and 1 + 4κ κk2 2 +κk 2 1 −k 1 = 0. (ii-2) IfC̸= 0, after substituting Eq. (666) into Eq. (580), one has 4 κ r2 k1 −2κk 2 1 −2κk 2 2 f1(r) +f ′′ 1 (r) + 2 r f ′ 1(r)− 2f1(r) r2 (1−2κk 1) ...

    work page

  14. [14]

    + 4κ2k3 (2k2 +k 3) 4κ2k2 ,(688) i.e., C2 = (k2 +k 3) (2κk1 −1) +k 2 4κ(κk2 1 −k 1 +κk 2

    work page

  15. [15]

    (686) whenk 3 becomes 0

    + 4κ2k2 2 + 4κ2k3 (2k2 +k 3) 4κ2k2 ,(689) i.e., C2 = (k2 +k 3) (2κk1 −1) +k 2 −1 + 4κ2(k2 +k 3)2 4κ2k2 ,(690) which reduces to Eq. (686) whenk 3 becomes 0. 72 Remark42.For convenience to build Tables II and III in Sec. VI, let us list the real and complex static solutions as follows. Real Static Solution.—We have the real static solution as f2(r) = C1 r ,...

    work page

  16. [16]

    static” means the solutions{ ⃗A, φ} are time-independent, “real

    The Real Static Solutions Based on the results in previous sections, we would like to list all the real static solutions of the Yang-Mills equations in Table II. TABLE II: All the real static solutions of the Yang-Mills equations. The spin vector potential is given by ⃗A= 1 r h k1(ˆr×⃗Γ) +k 2⃗Γ +k 3(⃗Γ·ˆr)ˆr i , and the scalar potential isφ=f 1(r)(⃗Γ·ˆr) ...

    work page

  17. [17]

    static” means the solutions{ ⃗A, φ} are time-independent, “complex

    The Complex Static Solutions Based on the results in previous sections, we would like to list the complex static solutions of the Yang-Mills equation in Table III. TABLE III: All the complex static solutions of the Yang-Mills equations. The spin vector potential is given by ⃗A= 1 r h k1(ˆr×⃗Γ) +k 2⃗Γ +k 3(⃗Γ·ˆr)ˆr i , and the scalar potential isφ=f 1(r)(⃗...

    work page

  18. [18]

    C. N. Yang and R. L. Mills,Conservation of Isotopic Spin and Isotopic Gauge Invariance, Physical Review96, 191 (1954)

    work page 1954

  19. [19]

    Weinberg,The quantum Theory of Fields, Vol

    S. Weinberg,The quantum Theory of Fields, Vol. 2: Modern Applications(Cambridge University Press, 1995)

    work page 1995

  20. [20]

    Zee,Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell (2nd ed.)(Princeton University Press, 2010)

    A. Zee,Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell (2nd ed.)(Princeton University Press, 2010)

    work page 2010

  21. [21]

    C. G. Callan, Jr., R. Dashen, and D. J. Gross,Toward a theory of the strong interactions, Phys. Rev. D17, 2717 (1978)

    work page 1978

  22. [22]

    T. T. Wu and C. N. Yang,Some solutions of the classical isotopic gauge field equations, inProperties of Matter Under Unusual Conditions, edited by H. Mark and S. Fernbach (Interscience, New York, 1969), pp. 349-354

    work page 1969

  23. [23]

    ’t Hooft,Magnetic monopoles in unified gauge theories, Nucl

    G. ’t Hooft,Magnetic monopoles in unified gauge theories, Nucl. Phys. B79, 276 (1974)

    work page 1974

  24. [24]

    M. K. Prasad and C. M. Sommerfield,Exact classical solution for the ’t Hooft monopole and the Julia-Zee dyon, Phys. Rev. Lett.35, 760 (1975)

    work page 1975

  25. [25]

    A. A. Belavin, A. M. Polyakov, A. S. Schwartz, and Yu. S. Tyupkin,Pseudoparticle solutions of the Yang-Mills equations, Phys. Lett. B59, 85 (1975)

    work page 1975

  26. [26]

    M. F. Atiyah, N. J. Hitchin, V. G. Drinfeld, and Yu. I. Manin,Construction of instantons, Phys. Lett. A65, 185 (1978)

    work page 1978

  27. [27]

    Nahm,The construction of all self-dual multimonopoles by the ADHM method, inMonopoles in Quantum Field Theory (World Scientific, Singapore, 1982), pp

    W. Nahm,The construction of all self-dual multimonopoles by the ADHM method, inMonopoles in Quantum Field Theory (World Scientific, Singapore, 1982), pp. 87-94

    work page 1982

  28. [28]

    Julia and A

    B. Julia and A. Zee,Poles with both magnetic and electric charges in non-Abelian gauge theory, Phys. Rev. D11, 2227 (1975)

    work page 1975

  29. [29]

    Witten,Some exact multipseudoparticle solutions of classical Yang-Mills theory, Phys

    E. Witten,Some exact multipseudoparticle solutions of classical Yang-Mills theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.38, 121 (1977)

    work page 1977

  30. [30]

    Forgacs and N

    P. Forgacs and N. S. Manton,Space-time symmetries in gauge theories, Commun. Math. Phys.72, 15 (1980)

    work page 1980

  31. [31]

    Corrigan and D

    E. Corrigan and D. B. Fairlie,Scalar field theory and exact solutions to a classical SU(2) gauge theory, Phys. Lett. B67, 69 (1977)

    work page 1977

  32. [32]

    Actor,Classical solutions of SU(2) Yang-Mills theories, Rev

    A. Actor,Classical solutions of SU(2) Yang-Mills theories, Rev. Mod. Phys.51, 461 (1979)

    work page 1979

  33. [33]

    Faddeev and A

    L. Faddeev and A. J. Niemi,Partially dual variables in SU(2) Yang-Mills theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 1624 (1999)

    work page 1999

  34. [34]

    J. L. Zhou, Y. X. Zhang, C. H. Oh, and J. L. Chen,Spin Vector Potential as an Exact Solution of the Yang-Mills Equations, preprint arXiv:2501.05103 (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    J. L. Chen, X. Y. Fan, and X. R. Xie,Spin Vector Potential and Spin Aharonov-Bohm Effect, Fundamental Research5, 2500 (2025)

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    Aharonov and D

    Y. Aharonov and D. Rohrlich, in Quantum Paradoxes, edited by Y. Aharonov and D. Rohrlich (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2005)

    work page 2005

  37. [37]

    J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics: Third Edition, (Wiley, New York 1999)

    work page 1999

  38. [38]

    P. A. M. Dirac,Quantised singularities in the electromagnetic field, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A133, 60 (1931)

    work page 1931

  39. [39]

    T. T. Wu and C. N. Yang,Concept of nonintegrable phase factors and global formulation of gauge fields, Phys. Rev. D12, 3845 (1975)

    work page 1975

  40. [40]

    T. T. Wu and C. N. Yang,Dirac monopole without strings: Monopole harmonics, Nucl. Phys. B107, 365 (1976)

    work page 1976

  41. [41]

    Witten,Analytic Continuation Of Chern-Simons Theory, AMS/IP Stud

    E. Witten,Analytic Continuation Of Chern-Simons Theory, AMS/IP Stud. Adv. Math.50, 347 (2011)

    work page 2011

  42. [42]

    G. V. Dunne and M. Unsal,Resurgence and trans-series in quantum field theory: the CP N−1 model, JHEP11, 170 (2012)

    work page 2012

  43. [43]

    Basar, G

    G. Basar, G. V. Dunne, and M. Unsal,Resurgence theory, ghost-instantons, and analytic continuation of path integrals, JHEP10, 041 (2013)

    work page 2013

  44. [44]

    Aniceto, G

    I. Aniceto, G. Basar, and R. Schiappa,A primer on resurgent transseries and their asymptotics, Phys. Rep.809, 1 (2019)

    work page 2019

  45. [45]

    C. H. Oh, L. C. Sia, and E. C. G. Sudarshan,Complex static solutions and wave solutions to (2+1)-dimensional topologically massive gauge theories, Phys. Lett. B248, 295 (1990)

    work page 1990

  46. [46]

    C. H. Oh, C. H. Lai, and R. Teh,Color radiation in the classical Yang-Mills theory, Phys. Rev. D33, 1133 (1986). 76

    work page 1986

  47. [47]

    C. H. Oh and R. Teh,Nonabelian progressive waves, J. Math. Phys.26, 841 (1985)

    work page 1985

  48. [48]

    A. S. Rabinowitch,On a wide class of solutions of SU(2) Yang-Mills equations describing non-Abelian progressive waves, Nucl. Phys. B1022, 117236 (2026)

    work page 2026