Recognition: unknown
Taming the Aretakis instability: extremal black holes with multi-degenerate horizons
Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 09:57 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Black holes with infinitely degenerate horizons can suppress the Aretakis instability that grows on standard extremal ones.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
Analysis of black hole examples with successively higher-order degenerate horizons shows that the Aretakis instability diminishes as degeneracy increases. This trend motivates a new geometry whose horizon is infinitely degenerate; the geometry is claimed to be stable under Aretakis-type perturbations and therefore to realize a possible graveyard end state for extremal black holes.
What carries the argument
The infinitely degenerate horizon, whose construction extends the observed weakening of Aretakis growth to the infinite limit and thereby removes the polynomial blow-up of perturbations.
If this is right
- Higher finite orders of horizon degeneracy reduce the rate and amplitude of Aretakis growth.
- The infinite-degeneracy limit removes the instability while preserving the extremal character of the solution.
- The resulting geometry supplies an explicit example of a classically stable end state reachable from non-extremal initial data.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- If such geometries can be formed dynamically, they would alter expectations for the late-time behavior of near-extremal black holes formed in mergers or collapse.
- Stability at infinite degeneracy may impose additional constraints on possible near-horizon geometries that satisfy the Einstein equations.
Load-bearing premise
The weakening of the instability seen at finite but increasing degeneracy orders continues smoothly into the infinite-degeneracy case without new instabilities appearing.
What would settle it
Explicit computation of perturbation evolution on the proposed infinitely degenerate geometry that reveals persistent growth would show the stability claim is incorrect.
read the original abstract
Stationary black hole geometries with non-degenerate Cauchy horizons are classically unstable due to mass inflation. At extremality, mass inflation is absent, but a different dynamical instability arises: the Aretakis instability. In this work, we investigate the properties of degenerate horizons and their associated Aretakis instabilities. By studying examples with increasingly higher-order horizon degeneracy, we show that the Aretakis instability weakens as the degree of degeneracy grows. Motivated by these results, we propose a new black hole geometry characterized by an infinitely degenerate horizon, which we argue is stable under Aretakis-type perturbations and may therefore provide a concrete realization of a "graveyard" end state for these objects.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper examines Aretakis instabilities on extremal black holes with horizons of successively higher but finite degeneracy order. Explicit examples demonstrate that the instability weakens as degeneracy increases. Motivated by this trend, the authors propose a new stationary black hole geometry with an infinitely degenerate horizon, which they argue is stable against Aretakis-type perturbations and may serve as a stable 'graveyard' end state.
Significance. The explicit finite-degeneracy calculations supply concrete evidence of a systematic weakening trend, which is a useful contribution to the literature on extremal black-hole dynamics. If the infinite-degeneracy limit can be rigorously constructed and shown to remain stable, the proposal would furnish a concrete geometric realization of a stable extremal configuration that evades both mass inflation and Aretakis growth, with potential implications for the final states of black-hole evolution.
major comments (2)
- [§4] §4 (proposal of the infinitely degenerate horizon): the stability argument for the infinite-degeneracy case rests on extrapolating the observed weakening trend from finite-order examples. No explicit metric ansatz, no well-defined limiting procedure from the finite-n family, and no direct linear perturbation analysis in the n→∞ limit are supplied, leaving the central claim that the geometry is stable an unverified extrapolation.
- [§3] §3 (finite-degeneracy examples): while the trend of weakening instability is shown for concrete finite orders, the manuscript does not provide a bound or scaling law for the instability measure as a function of degeneracy order that would justify continuation to infinity without new unstable modes or violations of the Einstein equations appearing in the limit.
minor comments (2)
- [§2] The definition of the degeneracy order parameter and its relation to the near-horizon expansion could be stated more explicitly, perhaps with a dedicated equation, to facilitate comparison with existing literature on degenerate horizons.
- [Figures] Figure captions for the instability measures versus degeneracy order should include the precise definition of the plotted quantity and any numerical convergence tests performed.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive comments. We address the major points raised below, indicating where revisions will be made to clarify the presentation and strengthen the discussion.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [§4] §4 (proposal of the infinitely degenerate horizon): the stability argument for the infinite-degeneracy case rests on extrapolating the observed weakening trend from finite-order examples. No explicit metric ansatz, no well-defined limiting procedure from the finite-n family, and no direct linear perturbation analysis in the n→∞ limit are supplied, leaving the central claim that the geometry is stable an unverified extrapolation.
Authors: We acknowledge that the proposal of the infinitely degenerate horizon is motivated by the observed trend in the finite-order cases and is presented as a conjectural stable end-state rather than a fully rigorous construction. In the revised manuscript we will explicitly describe the limiting procedure used to define the n→∞ geometry from the finite-n family, including the expected behavior of the metric functions, and we will state clearly that a closed-form metric ansatz and a complete linear perturbation analysis in the limit are not provided. The stability claim will be framed as an extrapolation supported by the systematic weakening of the instability, with the understanding that a direct verification remains an open question for future work. revision: partial
-
Referee: [§3] §3 (finite-degeneracy examples): while the trend of weakening instability is shown for concrete finite orders, the manuscript does not provide a bound or scaling law for the instability measure as a function of degeneracy order that would justify continuation to infinity without new unstable modes or violations of the Einstein equations appearing in the limit.
Authors: The calculations in §3 demonstrate a consistent reduction in the Aretakis growth rate across the explicit finite-degeneracy examples we have constructed. While an analytical bound or universal scaling law is not derived, the numerical evidence exhibits a clear monotonic trend. In the revision we will add a supplementary table or figure displaying the instability measure versus degeneracy order and include a brief discussion arguing that the observed pattern, together with the fact that the Einstein equations are satisfied at each finite order, makes the appearance of new unstable modes in the limit unlikely. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No significant circularity; derivation proceeds from explicit finite-order calculations to an extrapolated proposal.
full rationale
The paper first computes the weakening of Aretakis instability for concrete examples of successively higher (finite) horizon degeneracy orders. It then proposes an infinitely degenerate geometry motivated by the observed trend and argues for its stability on that basis. This is an extrapolation rather than a self-definitional loop, a fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or a load-bearing self-citation chain. No equations or steps in the provided abstract reduce the stability claim to a tautology or to the input data by construction; the infinite case is introduced as a new object whose properties are asserted to follow the trend. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (1)
- domain assumption Standard assumptions of classical general relativity and linear perturbation theory around stationary black hole backgrounds
invented entities (1)
-
Infinitely degenerate horizon black hole geometry
no independent evidence
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
M. Dafermos and I. Rodnianski,The Red-shift effect and radiation decay on black hole spacetimes,Commun. Pure Appl. Math.62(2009) 859 [gr-qc/0512119]
-
[2]
Lectures on black holes and linear waves
M. Dafermos and I. Rodnianski,Lectures on black holes and linear waves,Clay Math. Proc.17(2013) 97 [0811.0354]. – 40 –
work page Pith review arXiv 2013
-
[3]
S. Aretakis,The Wave Equation on Extreme Reissner-Nordstrom Black Hole Spacetimes: Stability and Instability Results,1006.0283
-
[4]
R. Carballo-Rubio et al.,Towards a non-singular paradigm of black hole physics, JCAP05(2025) 003 [2501.05505]
-
[5]
Simpson and R
M. Simpson and R. Penrose,Internal instability in a Reissner-Nordstrom black hole, Int. J. Theor. Phys.7(1973) 183
1973
-
[6]
Poisson and W
E. Poisson and W. Israel,Inner-horizon instability and mass inflation in black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett.63(1989) 1663
1989
-
[7]
Poisson and W
E. Poisson and W. Israel,Internal structure of black holes,Phys. Rev. D41(1990) 1796
1990
-
[8]
A. Bonanno, S. Droz, W. Israel and S. M. Morsink,Structure of the inner singularity of a spherical black hole,Phys. Rev. D50(1994) 7372 [gr-qc/9403019]
-
[9]
A. Bonanno, S. Droz, W. Israel and S. M. Morsink,Structure of the spherical black hole interior,Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A450(1995) 553 [gr-qc/9411050]
- [10]
- [11]
-
[12]
R. Carballo-Rubio, F. Di Filippo, S. Liberati, C. Pacilio and M. Visser,On the viability of regular black holes,JHEP07(2018) 023 [1805.02675]
-
[13]
T. McMaken and A. J. S. Hamilton,Geometry near the inner horizon of a rotating, accreting black hole,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 084014 [2102.10402]
-
[14]
Visser,Black holes, Cauchy horizons, and mass inflation,Gen
M. Visser,Black holes, Cauchy horizons, and mass inflation,Gen. Rel. Grav.56 (2024) 146
2024
-
[15]
R. Carballo-Rubio, F. Di Filippo, S. Liberati and M. Visser,Mass Inflation without Cauchy Horizons,Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024) 181402 [2402.14913]
-
[16]
S. Hollands, R. M. Wald and J. Zahn,Quantum instability of the Cauchy horizon in Reissner–Nordström–deSitter spacetime,Class. Quant. Grav.37(2020) 115009 [1912.06047]
-
[17]
McMaken,Semiclassical instability of inner-extremal regular black holes,Phys
T. McMaken,Semiclassical instability of inner-extremal regular black holes,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 125023 [2303.03562]
-
[18]
McMaken,Backreaction from quantum fluxes at the Kerr inner horizon,Phys
T. McMaken,Backreaction from quantum fluxes at the Kerr inner horizon,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 045019 [2405.13221]
-
[19]
C. Barceló, V. Boyanov, R. Carballo-Rubio and L. J. Garay,Black hole inner horizon evaporation in semiclassical gravity,Class. Quant. Grav.38(2021) 125003 [2011.07331]
-
[20]
C. Barceló, V. Boyanov, R. Carballo-Rubio and L. J. Garay,Classical mass inflation – 41 – versus semiclassical inner horizon inflation,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 124006 [2203.13539]
-
[21]
J. Barenboim, A. V. Frolov and G. Kunstatter,Evaporation of regular black holes in 2D dilaton gravity,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 104068 [2503.03191]
-
[22]
V. Boyanov, D. Hilditch and A. Semião,Semiclassical evolution of a dynamically formed spherical black hole with an inner horizon,2506.04845
-
[23]
J. M. Bardeen,Non-singular general-relativistic gravitational collapse, inProceedings of the 5th International Conference on Gravitation and the Theory of Relativity (GR5), (Tbilisi, USSR), pp. 174–181, 1968
1968
-
[24]
Dymnikova,Vacuum nonsingular black hole,General Relativity and Gravitation24 (1992) 235
I. Dymnikova,Vacuum nonsingular black hole,General Relativity and Gravitation24 (1992) 235
1992
-
[25]
S. A. Hayward,Formation and evaporation of regular black holes,Physical Review Letters96(2006) 031103 [gr-qc/0506126]
work page Pith review arXiv 2006
-
[26]
P. V. P. Cunha, E. Berti and C. A. R. Herdeiro,Light-Ring Stability for Ultracompact Objects,Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017) 251102 [1708.04211]
work page Pith review arXiv 2017
-
[27]
Di Filippo,Nature of inner light rings,Phys
F. Di Filippo,Nature of inner light rings,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 084026 [2404.07357]
-
[28]
Slowly decaying waves on spherically sym- metric spacetimes and ultracompact neutron stars,
J. Keir,Slowly decaying waves on spherically symmetric spacetimes and ultracompact neutron stars,Class. Quant. Grav.33(2016) 135009 [1404.7036]
-
[29]
V. Cardoso, L. C. B. Crispino, C. F. B. Macedo, H. Okawa and P. Pani,Light rings as observational evidence for event horizons: long-lived modes, ergoregions and nonlinear instabilities of ultracompact objects,Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 044069 [1406.5510]
work page Pith review arXiv 2014
-
[30]
S. Aretakis,Stability and Instability of Extreme Reissner-Nordström Black Hole Spacetimes for Linear Scalar Perturbations I,Commun. Math. Phys.307(2011) 17 [1110.2007]
-
[31]
S. Aretakis,Stability and Instability of Extreme Reissner-Nordström Black Hole Spacetimes for Linear Scalar Perturbations II,Annales Henri Poincare12(2011) 1491 [1110.2009]
-
[32]
J. Lucietti and H. S. Reall,Gravitational instability of an extreme Kerr black hole, Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 104030 [1208.1437]
-
[33]
J. Lucietti, K. Murata, H. S. Reall and N. Tanahashi,On the horizon instability of an extreme Reissner-Nordström black hole,JHEP03(2013) 035 [1212.2557]
- [34]
- [35]
- [36]
- [37]
-
[38]
R. Carballo-Rubio, F. Di Filippo, S. Liberati, C. Pacilio and M. Visser,Regular black holes without mass inflation instability,JHEP09(2022) 118 [2205.13556]
-
[39]
E. Franzin, S. Liberati, J. Mazza and V. Vellucci,Stable rotating regular black holes, Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 104060 [2207.08864]
-
[40]
Fully extremal black holes: a black hole graveyard?
F. Di Filippo, S. Liberati and M. Visser,Fully extremal black holes: A black hole graveyard?,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D33(2024) 2440005 [2405.08069]
-
[41]
P. Zimmerman,Horizon instability of extremal Reissner-Nordström black holes to charged perturbations,Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 124032 [1612.03172]
-
[42]
S. Agrawal, P. Charalambous and L. Donnay,Null infinity as an inverted extremal horizon: Matching an infinite set of conserved quantities for gravitational perturbations,2506.15526
- [43]
-
[44]
Hadar,Near-extremal black holes at late times, backreacted,JHEP01(2019) 214 [1811.01022]
S. Hadar,Near-extremal black holes at late times, backreacted,JHEP01(2019) 214 [1811.01022]
-
[45]
J. M. Bardeen and G. T. Horowitz,The Extreme Kerr throat geometry: A Vacuum analog ofAdS 2×S2,Phys. Rev. D60(1999) 104030 [hep-th/9905099]
work page Pith review arXiv 1999
- [46]
- [47]
-
[48]
S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov,Regular multihorizon black holes in modified gravity with nonlinear electrodynamics,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 104008 [1708.05226]
- [49]
-
[50]
Gao,Black holes with many horizons in the theories of nonlinear electrodynamics, Phys
C. Gao,Black holes with many horizons in the theories of nonlinear electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 064038 [2106.13486]
-
[51]
Black holes of multiple horizons without mass inflation
C. Gao and T. Saken,Black holes of multiple horizons without mass inflation, 2508.12646
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
- [52]
-
[53]
E. Franzin, S. Liberati and V. Vellucci,From regular black holes to horizonless objects: quasi-normal modes, instabilities and spectroscopy,JCAP01(2024) 020 – 43 – [2310.11990]
- [54]
- [55]
-
[56]
Quantum transparency of near-extremal black holes,
R. Emparan and S. Trezzi,Quantum transparency of near-extremal black holes, JHEP10(2025) 023 [2507.03398]. – 44 –
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.