pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.15417 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-16 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · cond-mat.supr-con· physics.optics· quant-ph

Ultrastrong Coupling Signatures in Photon Statistics from Terahertz Higgs-Polaritons

Spenser Talkington , Benjamin Kass , Martin Claassen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 09:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.supr-conphysics.opticsquant-ph
keywords ultrastrong couplingHiggs polaritonphoton statisticsterahertzsuperconductorcavity QEDdark stateinput-output theory
0
0 comments X

The pith

Two-photon coincidence statistics diagnose ultrastrong coupling in superconductors where total counts do not.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper aims to establish a diagnostic for the ultrastrong coupling regime between cavity photons and quantum materials by looking at the quantum statistics of transmitted light rather than average intensity. It shows that a two-photon Higgs polariton forms a hybrid photon-matter dark-cavity state carrying finite photon occupancy once coupling strengthens. This state creates a nonlinearity visible at the single terahertz photon level, altering the probability of detecting photon pairs. The authors apply a non-Markovian input-output relation to the superconductor 2H-NbSe2 and predict clear changes in coincidence rates as the system approaches the ultrastrong limit. The result supplies a concrete way to confirm ultrastrong coupling effects through measurable photon statistics.

Core claim

Focusing on the quantum photon statistics of light transmitted through a cavity-embedded superconductor, we show that a two-photon Higgs polariton at strong coupling realizes a photonic nonlinearity at the single terahertz photon level. We find that as light-matter coupling increases, the photon statistics show pronounced changes due to the formation of a hybrid photon-matter dark-cavity state with finite photon occupancy, producing testable signatures of ultrastrong coupling. Our results reveal a diagnostic for ultrastrong coupling in the two-photon coincidence statistics that is absent in total counts.

What carries the argument

The two-photon Higgs polariton and its associated hybrid dark-cavity state with finite photon occupancy, modeled via non-Markovian input-output relations.

If this is right

  • Total integrated photon counts remain insensitive to the transition into the ultrastrong regime.
  • Two-photon coincidence statistics exhibit pronounced deviations from weak-coupling or classical expectations.
  • The signatures appear specifically in the transmitted light at terahertz frequencies for the material 2H-NbSe2.
  • The non-Markovian framework predicts the dark-state formation that drives the statistical changes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same coincidence-based diagnostic could be tested in other materials that host collective modes in cavities.
  • Photon statistics may serve as a general monitor for cavity-induced changes to material response beyond spectral shifts.
  • Experiments that vary cavity detuning or material thickness could map how the dark-state occupancy scales with coupling.

Load-bearing premise

The non-Markovian input-output relation and the two-photon Higgs-polariton model accurately capture the formation of a hybrid dark-cavity state with finite photon occupancy as coupling approaches the ultrastrong regime in 2H-NbSe2.

What would settle it

Measuring the second-order correlation function of transmitted terahertz light from a 2H-NbSe2 cavity and finding no change in two-photon coincidence rates as coupling strength is increased would falsify the predicted diagnostic.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.15417 by Benjamin Kass, Martin Claassen, Spenser Talkington.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. THz photon blockade from cavity two-photon Higgs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The ultrastrong coupling regime of cavity photons and quantum materials has emerged as a pathway to modify materials properties, however definitive signatures of ultrastrong coupling remain elusive. Focusing on the quantum photon statistics of light transmitted through a cavity-embedded superconductor, we show that a two-photon Higgs polariton at strong coupling realizes a photonic nonlinearity at the single terahertz photon level. We find that as light-matter coupling increases, the photon statistics show pronounced changes due to the formation of a hybrid photon-matter dark-cavity state with finite photon occupancy, producing testable signatures of ultrastrong coupling. We derive a non-Markovian input output relation and study the cavity-embedded superconductor 2H-NbSe2 as it approaches ultrastrong light-matter coupling. Our results reveal a diagnostic for ultrastrong coupling in the two-photon coincidence statistics that is absent in total counts.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper derives a non-Markovian input-output relation from a two-photon truncated Higgs-polariton Hamiltonian for a cavity-embedded superconductor and applies it to 2H-NbSe2 approaching the ultrastrong coupling regime. It claims that the resulting hybrid dark-cavity state acquires finite photon occupancy, producing a detectable signature in the two-photon coincidence statistics g^{(2)}(0) that is absent from the integrated transmission (total counts).

Significance. If the central derivation holds, the work supplies a photon-statistics diagnostic for ultrastrong coupling that is independent of total intensity, offering a potentially falsifiable prediction for terahertz experiments on materials such as NbSe2 and extending the toolkit for identifying USC beyond conventional spectral shifts.

major comments (2)
  1. [two-photon Higgs-polariton model and non-Markovian input-output derivation] The two-photon truncation of the Higgs-polariton Hamiltonian is load-bearing for the claimed finite occupancy of the hybrid dark-cavity state; in the USC regime counter-rotating terms generate virtual photons that dress the ground state, and it is not shown that the truncation converges or that the predicted contrast between g^{(2)}(0) and total counts survives inclusion of higher photon sectors.
  2. [non-Markovian input-output relation] The non-Markovian input-output relation is asserted to capture the formation of the dark state with finite photon occupancy, yet the manuscript provides no explicit error analysis or comparison against a Markovian limit or full bath treatment; without this, it remains unclear whether the reported diagnostic is an artifact of the elimination procedure rather than a genuine USC signature.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the diagnostic is 'absent in total counts' but does not quantify the contrast or specify the exact observable (e.g., integrated transmission versus frequency-resolved transmission).
  2. [Introduction / Model section] Notation for the light-matter coupling strength and the definition of the dark-cavity state should be introduced with explicit equations early in the text to aid readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thoughtful and detailed report. The comments highlight important aspects of our approximations and derivations. We address each point below with additional justification and indicate the corresponding revisions to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The two-photon truncation of the Higgs-polariton Hamiltonian is load-bearing for the claimed finite occupancy of the hybrid dark-cavity state; in the USC regime counter-rotating terms generate virtual photons that dress the ground state, and it is not shown that the truncation converges or that the predicted contrast between g^{(2)}(0) and total counts survives inclusion of higher photon sectors.

    Authors: The two-photon truncation is adopted because the observable of interest is the second-order photon correlation g^{(2)}(0), which is determined by processes involving at most two photons. Within the parameter range relevant to 2H-NbSe2 approaching the USC regime, the energy cost of higher photon sectors remains large compared with the coupling strength, so their steady-state occupation is perturbatively small. We have added a new subsection that explicitly includes a three-photon sector in a perturbative treatment and demonstrates that the qualitative contrast between g^{(2)}(0) and the integrated transmission persists. A fully converged calculation over an infinite photon ladder is numerically demanding and lies outside the present scope; however, the leading-order signature arising from the counter-rotating terms is robust against this extension. revision: partial

  2. Referee: The non-Markovian input-output relation is asserted to capture the formation of the dark state with finite photon occupancy, yet the manuscript provides no explicit error analysis or comparison against a Markovian limit or full bath treatment; without this, it remains unclear whether the reported diagnostic is an artifact of the elimination procedure rather than a genuine USC signature.

    Authors: The non-Markovian input-output relation is obtained by exact elimination of the bath modes from the two-photon truncated Hamiltonian, without invoking the Markov or secular approximations. This procedure retains the coherent dressing responsible for the hybrid dark-cavity state. In the revised manuscript we now include a direct comparison: under the Markovian limit the dark-state photon occupancy vanishes and the g^{(2)}(0) diagnostic disappears, while the non-Markovian treatment recovers the finite occupancy. A quantitative error bound relative to a full multimode bath treatment would require solving the complete quantum-optical master equation; within the model employed the derivation is exact, and the Markovian comparison confirms that the reported signature is not an artifact of the elimination step. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; model-derived signatures remain independent of inputs

full rationale

The paper derives a non-Markovian input-output relation from the two-photon Higgs-polariton Hamiltonian and computes transmitted photon statistics (including g^{(2)}(0)) as the light-matter coupling is varied toward the ultrastrong regime. The claimed diagnostic—that coincidence statistics reveal a hybrid dark-cavity state with finite occupancy while total counts do not—is obtained by solving the model equations rather than by fitting parameters to the target observable or by redefining the input. No self-citations, ansatzes, or uniqueness theorems are invoked in the abstract or reader-provided sections to close the derivation loop. The two-photon truncation and non-Markovian map are explicit modeling choices whose consequences are computed forward, not presupposed.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the Higgs-polariton framework for 2H-NbSe2 and the non-Markovian input-output relation; these are domain assumptions rather than derived results.

free parameters (1)
  • light-matter coupling strength
    Parameter that is increased to approach the ultrastrong regime and produce the hybrid dark-cavity state.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The cavity-embedded superconductor dynamics are captured by a non-Markovian input-output relation involving Higgs polaritons
    Invoked to derive the photon statistics and the diagnostic signature.
invented entities (1)
  • hybrid photon-matter dark-cavity state with finite photon occupancy no independent evidence
    purpose: Accounts for changes in photon statistics at strong coupling
    Introduced as a consequence of increasing light-matter coupling in the model; no independent falsifiable handle given in abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5459 in / 1533 out tokens · 54256 ms · 2026-05-10T09:30:30.114117+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

121 extracted references · 121 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Schlawin, D

    F. Schlawin, D. M. Kennes, and M. A. Sentef, Cavity quantum materials, Appl. Phys. Rev.9, 011312 (2022)

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    Bloch, A

    J. Bloch, A. Cavalleri, V. Galitski, M. Hafezi, and A. Rubio, Strongly correlated electron–photon systems, Nature606, 41 (2022)

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    H¨ ubener, E

    H. H¨ ubener, E. V. Bostr¨ om, M. Claassen, S. Latini, and A. Rubio, Quantum materials engineering by struc- tured cavity vacuum fluctuations, Materials for Quan- tum Technology4, 023002 (2024)

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    F. J. Garcia-Vidal, C. Ciuti, and T. W. Ebbesen, Ma- nipulating matter by strong coupling to vacuum fields, Science373, eabd0336 (2021)

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    H. M. Bretscher, L. Graziotto, M. H. Michael, A. Mon- tanaro, I.-T. Lu, A. Grankin, J. W. McIver, J. Faist, D. Fausti, M. Eckstein, et al., Fluctuation engineering in cavity quantum materials, arXiv2604, 08666 (2026)

    work page 2026

  6. [6]

    Appugliese, J

    F. Appugliese, J. Enkner, G. L. Paravicini-Bagliani, M. Beck, C. Reichl, W. Wegscheider, G. Scalari, C. Ciuti, and J. Faist, Breakdown of topological pro- tection by cavity vacuum fields in the integer quantum Hall effect, Science375, 1030 (2022)

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Enkner, L

    J. Enkner, L. Graziotto, D. Borici, F. Appugliese, C. Re- ichl, G. Scalari, N. Regnault, W. Wegscheider, C. Ciuti, and J. Faist, Tunable vacuum-field control of fractional and integer quantum Hall phases, Nature641, 884 (2025)

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    Graziotto, J

    L. Graziotto, J. Enkner, S. Chattopadhyay, J. B. Cur- tis, E. Koskas, C. Reichl, W. Wegscheider, G. Scalari, E. Demler, and J. Faist, Cavity QED Control of Quan- tum Hall Stripes, arXiv2502, 15490 (2025). 6

    work page 2025

  9. [9]

    M. A. Sentef, M. Ruggenthaler, and A. Rubio, Cav- ity quantum-electrodynamical polaritonically enhanced electron-phonon coupling and its influence on supercon- ductivity, Sci. Adv.4, eaau6969 (2018)

    work page 2018

  10. [10]

    Schlawin, A

    F. Schlawin, A. Cavalleri, and D. Jaksch, Cavity- mediated electron-photon superconductivity, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 133602 (2019)

    work page 2019

  11. [11]

    J. B. Curtis, Z. M. Raines, A. A. Allocca, M. Hafezi, and V. M. Galitski, Cavity quantum Eliashberg enhance- ment of superconductivity, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 167002 (2019)

    work page 2019

  12. [12]

    Thomas, E

    A. Thomas, E. Devaux, K. Nagarajan, T. Chervy, M. Seidel, G. Rogez, J. Robert, M. Drillon, T.-T. Ruan, S. Schlittenhardt, et al., Exploring superconductivity under strong coupling with the vacuum electromagnetic field, J. Chem. Phys.162, 134701 (2025)

    work page 2025

  13. [13]

    Keren, T

    I. Keren, T. A. Webb, S. Zhang, J. Xu, D. Sun, B. S. Y. Kim, D. Shin, S. S. Zhang, J. Zhang, G. Pereira, et al., Cavity-altered superconductivity, Nature650, 864 (2026)

    work page 2026

  14. [14]

    H. Xu, A. Baydin, Q. Yi, I.-T. Lu, N. Zhu, T. E. Kritzell, J. Doumani, D. Kim, F. Tay, A. Rubio, et al., Vacuum- dressed superconductivity in NbN observed in a high-Q terahertz cavity, arXiv2601, 08191 (2026)

    work page 2026

  15. [15]

    G. Jarc, S. Y. Mathengattil, A. Montanaro, F. Giusti, E. M. Rigoni, R. Sergo, F. Fassioli, S. Winnerl, S. Dal Zilio, D. Mihailovic, et al., Cavity-mediated ther- mal control of metal-to-insulator transition in 1T-TaS2, Nature622, 487 (2023)

    work page 2023

  16. [16]

    Fassioli, J

    F. Fassioli, J. Faist, M. Eckstein, and D. Fausti, Control- ling radiative heat flow through cavity electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. B111, 165425 (2025)

    work page 2025

  17. [17]

    D. N. Basov, A. Asenjo-Garcia, P. J. Schuck, X. Zhu, and A. Rubio, Polariton panorama, Nanophotonics10, 549 (2020)

    work page 2020

  18. [18]

    Smolka, W

    S. Smolka, W. Wuester, F. Haupt, S. Faelt, W. Wegscheider, and A. Imamoglu, Cavity quan- tum electrodynamics with many-body states of a two- dimensional electron gas, Science346, 332 (2014)

    work page 2014

  19. [19]

    Maissen, G

    C. Maissen, G. Scalari, F. Valmorra, M. Beck, J. Faist, S. Cibella, R. Leoni, C. Reichl, C. Charpentier, and W. Wegscheider, Ultrastrong coupling in the near field of complementary split-ring resonators, Phys. Rev. B 90, 205309 (2014)

    work page 2014

  20. [20]

    G. L. Paravicini-Bagliani, F. Appugliese, E. Richter, F. Valmorra, J. Keller, M. Beck, N. Bartolo, C. Rossler, T. Ihn, K. Ensslin, et al., Magneto-transport controlled by Landau polariton states, Nat. Phys.15, 186 (2019)

    work page 2019

  21. [21]

    Keller, G

    J. Keller, G. Scalari, F. Appugliese, S. Rajabali, M. Beck, J. Haase, C. A. Lehner, W. Wegscheider, M. Failla, M. Myronov, et al., Landau polaritons in highly nonparabolic two-dimensional gases in the ul- trastrong coupling regime, Phys. Rev. B101, 075301 (2020)

    work page 2020

  22. [22]

    Weber, E

    L. Weber, E. Vi˜ nas Bostr¨ om, M. Claassen, A. Rubio, and D. M. Kennes, Cavity-renormalized quantum criti- cality in a honeycomb bilayer antiferromagnet, Commu- nications Physics6, 247 (2023)

    work page 2023

  23. [23]

    B. Kass, S. Talkington, A. Srivastava, and M. Claassen, Many-body photon blockade and quantum light gener- ation from cavity quantum materials, arXiv preprint , arXiv:2411.08964 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    S. Sur, Y. Wang, M. Mahankali, S. Paschen, and Q. Si, Amplified response of cavity-coupled quantum-critical systems, arXiv2509, 26620 (2025)

    work page 2025

  25. [25]

    Ashida, A

    Y. Ashida, A. Imamoglu, and E. Demler, Cavity quan- tum electrodynamics at arbitrary light-matter coupling strengths, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 153603 (2021)

    work page 2021

  26. [26]

    Chiocchetta, D

    A. Chiocchetta, D. Kiese, C. P. Zelle, F. Piazza, and S. Diehl, Cavity-induced quantum spin liquids, Nat. Commun.12, 5901 (2021)

    work page 2021

  27. [27]

    Vi˜ nas Bostr¨ om, A

    E. Vi˜ nas Bostr¨ om, A. Sriram, M. Claassen, and A. Ru- bio, Controlling the magnetic state of the proximate quantum spin liquidα-RuCl3 with an optical cavity, npj Comput. Mater.9, 202 (2023)

    work page 2023

  28. [28]

    C. J. Eckhardt, G. Passetti, M. Othman, C. Karrasch, F. Cavaliere, M. A. Sentef, and D. M. Kennes, Quan- tum Floquet engineering with an exactly solvable tight- binding chain in a cavity, Communications Physics5, 122 (2022)

    work page 2022

  29. [29]

    Passetti, C

    G. Passetti, C. J. Eckhardt, M. A. Sentef, and D. M. Kennes, Cavity light-matter entanglement through quantum fluctuations, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 023601 (2023)

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    Shaffer, M

    D. Shaffer, M. Claassen, A. Srivastava, and L. H. Santos, Entanglement and topology in Su-Schrieffer-Heeger cav- ity quantum electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. B109, 155160 (2024)

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    Kiffner, J

    M. Kiffner, J. R. Coulthard, F. Schlawin, A. Ardavan, and D. Jaksch, Manipulating quantum materials with quantum light, Phys. Rev. B99, 085116 (2019)

    work page 2019

  32. [32]

    Nambiar, A

    G. Nambiar, A. Grankin, and M. Hafezi, Diagnosing electronic phases of matter using photonic correlation functions, Phys. Rev. X15, 041020 (2025)

    work page 2025

  33. [33]

    Grunwald, E

    L. Grunwald, E. V. Bostr¨ om, M. K. Svendsen, D. M. Kennes, and A. Rubio, Cavity spectroscopy for strongly correlated polaritonic systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 246901 (2025)

    work page 2025

  34. [34]

    D. Kim, M. Dherb´ ecourt, S. R. Endo, G. Lee, A. Agrawal, S. Kim, W.-H. Wu, A. D. Mohite, M. Seo, D. Hagenm¨ uller, et al., Symmetry-Controlled Ultra- strong Phonon-Photon Coupling in a Terahertz Cavity, arXiv2511, 16285 (2025)

    work page 2025

  35. [35]

    Baydin, M

    A. Baydin, M. Manjappa, S. S. Mishra, H. Xu, J. Doumani, F. Tay, D. Kim, P. H. O. Rappl, E. Abramof, R. Singh, et al., Terahertz cavity phonon polaritons in lead telluride in the deep-strong coupling regime, arXiv2501, 10856 (2025)

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    A. A. Allocca, Z. M. Raines, J. B. Curtis, and V. M. Galitski, Cavity superconductor-polaritons, Phys. Rev. B99, 020504 (2019)

    work page 2019

  37. [37]

    Z. M. Raines, A. A. Allocca, M. Hafezi, and V. M. Gal- itski, Cavity Higgs polaritons, Phys. Rev. Research2, 013143 (2020)

    work page 2020

  38. [38]

    T. E. Glier, S. Tian, M. Rerrer, L. Westphal, G. L¨ ullau, L. Feng, J. Dolgner, R. Haenel, M. Zonno, H. Eisaki, et al., Non-equilibrium anti-Stokes Raman spectroscopy for investigating Higgs modes in superconductors, Nat. Commun.16, 7027 (2025)

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    Ridolfo, M

    A. Ridolfo, M. Leib, S. Savasta, and M. J. Hartmann, Photon blockade in the ultrastrong coupling regime, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 193602 (2012)

    work page 2012

  40. [40]

    Flayac and V

    H. Flayac and V. Savona, Input-output theory of the un- conventional photon blockade, Phys. Rev. A88, 033836 (2013)

    work page 2013

  41. [41]

    Muller, A

    K. Muller, A. Rundquist, K. A. Fischer, T. Sarmiento, K. G. Lagoudakis, Y. A. Kelaita, C. Sanchez Munoz, E. Del Valle, F. P. Laussy, and J. Vuckovic, Coherent 7 generation of nonclassical light on chip via detuned pho- ton blockade, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 233601 (2015)

    work page 2015

  42. [42]

    H. Goto, S. Mizukami, Y. Tokunaga, and T. Aoki, Fig- ure of merit for single-photon generation based on cav- ity quantum electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. A99, 053843 (2019)

    work page 2019

  43. [43]

    Heinisch, F

    N. Heinisch, F. Salusti, M. R. Hogg, T. L. Baltisberger, M. A. Marczak, S. R. Valentin, A. Ludwig, K. D. J¨ ons, R. J. Warburton, and S. Schumacher, High-quality sin- gle photons from cavity-enhanced biexciton-to-exciton transition, arXiv2602, 18153 (2026)

    work page 2026

  44. [44]

    Trivedi, M

    R. Trivedi, M. Radulaski, K. A. Fischer, S. Fan, and J. Vuˇ ckovi´ c, Photon blockade in weakly driven cavity quantum electrodynamics systems with many emitters, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 243602 (2019)

    work page 2019

  45. [45]

    M. Chen, J. Tang, L. Tang, H. Wu, and K. Xia, Pho- ton blockade and single-photon generation with multi- ple quantum emitters, Phys. Rev. Research4, 033083 (2022)

    work page 2022

  46. [46]

    Delteil, T

    A. Delteil, T. Fink, A. Schade, S. Hofling, C. Schneider, and A. Imamoglu, Towards polariton blockade of con- fined exciton–polaritons, Nat. Mater.18, 219 (2019)

    work page 2019

  47. [47]

    Mandel, Fluctuations of photon beams: the distri- bution of the photo-electrons, Proc

    L. Mandel, Fluctuations of photon beams: the distri- bution of the photo-electrons, Proc. Phys. Soc.74, 233 (1959)

    work page 1959

  48. [48]

    R. J. Glauber, The quantum theory of optical coherence, Phys. Rev.130, 2529 (1963)

    work page 1963

  49. [49]

    R. H. Brown and R. Q. Twiss, Correlation between pho- tons in two coherent beams of light, Nature177, 27 (1956)

    work page 1956

  50. [50]

    Paul, Photon antibunching, Rev

    H. Paul, Photon antibunching, Rev. Mod. Phys.54, 1061 (1982)

    work page 1982

  51. [51]

    D. E. Chang, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum nonlinear optics—photon by photon, Nat. Photonics8, 685 (2014)

    work page 2014

  52. [52]

    Shen and S

    J.-T. Shen and S. Fan, Coherent Single Photon Trans- port in a One-Dimensional Waveguide Coupled with Superconducting Quantum Bits, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 213001 (2005)

    work page 2005

  53. [53]

    Shen and S

    J.-T. Shen and S. Fan, Strongly correlated two-photon transport in a one-dimensional waveguide coupled to a two-level system, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 153003 (2007)

    work page 2007

  54. [54]

    Fan, S ¸

    S. Fan, S ¸. E. Kocaba¸ s, and J.-T. Shen, Input-output formalism for few-photon transport in one-dimensional nanophotonic waveguides coupled to a qubit, Phys. Rev. A82, 063821 (2010)

    work page 2010

  55. [55]

    Ciuti, G

    C. Ciuti, G. Bastard, and I. Carusotto, Quantum vac- uum properties of the intersubband cavity polariton field, Phys. Rev. B72, 115303 (2005)

    work page 2005

  56. [56]

    Ciuti and I

    C. Ciuti and I. Carusotto, Input-output theory of cav- ities in the ultrastrong coupling regime: The case of time-independent cavity parameters, Phys. Rev. A74, 033811 (2006)

    work page 2006

  57. [57]

    Shimano and N

    R. Shimano and N. Tsuji, Higgs mode in superconduc- tors, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.11, 103 (2020)

    work page 2020

  58. [58]

    Pekker and C

    D. Pekker and C. M. Varma, Amplitude/Higgs modes in condensed matter physics, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.6, 269 (2015)

    work page 2015

  59. [59]

    H. P. Ojeda Collado, M. H. Michael, J. Skulte, A. Rubio, and L. Mathey, Equilibrium parametric amplification in Raman-cavity hybrids, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 116901 (2024)

    work page 2024

  60. [60]

    Forn-D´ ıaz, L

    P. Forn-D´ ıaz, L. Lamata, E. Rico, J. Kono, and E. Solano, Ultrastrong coupling regimes of light-matter interaction, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 025005 (2019)

    work page 2019

  61. [61]

    Frisk Kockum, A

    A. Frisk Kockum, A. Miranowicz, S. De Liberato, S. Savasta, and F. Nori, Ultrastrong coupling between light and matter, Nature Reviews Physics1, 19 (2019)

    work page 2019

  62. [62]

    Stefanini, A

    M. Stefanini, A. A. Ziolkowska, D. Budker, U. Poschinger, F. Schmidt-Kaler, A. Browaeys, A. Imamoglu, D. Chang, and J. Marino, Is Lindblad for me?, arXiv2506, 22436 (2025)

    work page 2025

  63. [63]

    P. D. Drummond, K. J. McNeil, and D. F. Walls, Non- equilibrium transitions in sub/second harmonic genera- tion, Opt. Acta27, 321 (1980)

    work page 1980

  64. [64]

    C. W. Gardiner and M. J. Collett, Input and output in damped quantum systems: Quantum stochastic differ- ential equations and the master equation, Phys. Rev. A 31, 3761 (1985)

    work page 1985

  65. [65]

    A. A. Clerk, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, F. Marquardt, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Introduction to quantum noise, measurement, and amplification, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1155 (2010)

    work page 2010

  66. [66]

    Carusotto and C

    I. Carusotto and C. Ciuti, Quantum fluids of light, Rev. Mod. Phys.85, 299 (2013)

    work page 2013

  67. [67]

    Tsuji and H

    N. Tsuji and H. Aoki, Theory of Anderson pseudospin resonance with Higgs mode in superconductors, Phys. Rev. B92, 064508 (2015)

    work page 2015

  68. [68]

    Matsunaga, Y

    R. Matsunaga, Y. I. Hamada, K. Makise, Y. Uzawa, H. Terai, Z. Wang, and R. Shimano, Higgs Amplitude Mode in BCS Superconductors Nb 1-x Ti x N induced by Terahertz Pulse Excitation, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 057002 (2013)

    work page 2013

  69. [69]

    Matsunaga, N

    R. Matsunaga, N. Tsuji, H. Fujita, A. Sugioka, K. Makise, Y. Uzawa, H. Terai, Z. Wang, H. Aoki, and R. Shimano, Light-induced collective pseudospin preces- sion resonating with Higgs mode in a superconductor, Science345, 1145 (2014)

    work page 2014

  70. [70]

    Nakamura, K

    S. Nakamura, K. Katsumi, H. Terai, and R. Shi- mano, Nonreciprocal terahertz second-harmonic gener- ation in superconducting NbN under supercurrent in- jection, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 097004 (2020)

    work page 2020

  71. [71]

    Katsumi, Z

    K. Katsumi, Z. Z. Li, H. Raffy, Y. Gallais, and R. Shimano, Superconducting fluctuations probed by the Higgs mode in Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x thin films, Phys. Rev. B102, 054510 (2020)

    work page 2020

  72. [72]

    Chu, M.-J

    H. Chu, M.-J. Kim, K. Katsumi, S. Kovalev, R. D. Daw- son, L. Schwarz, N. Yoshikawa, G. Kim, D. Putzky, Z. Z. Li, et al., Phase-resolved Higgs response in supercon- ducting cuprates, Nat. Commun.11, 1793 (2020)

    work page 2020

  73. [73]

    Katsumi, Y

    K. Katsumi, Y. Gallais, and R. Shimano, Distinct tera- hertz nonlinear and Raman responses in cuprate super- conductors Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x, npj Quantum Mater. 10, 91 (2025)

    work page 2025

  74. [74]

    P. W. Anderson, Random-phase approximation in the theory of superconductivity, Phys. Rev.112, 1900 (1958)

    work page 1900

  75. [75]

    T. P. Devereaux and R. Hackl, Inelastic light scatter- ing from correlated electrons, Rev. Mod. Phys.79, 175 (2007)

    work page 2007

  76. [76]

    P. B. Littlewood and C. M. Varma, Gauge-invariant the- ory of the dynamical interaction of charge density waves and superconductivity, Phys. Rev. Lett.47, 811 (1981)

    work page 1981

  77. [77]

    P. B. Littlewood and C. M. Varma, Amplitude collective modes in superconductors and their coupling to charge- density waves, Phys. Rev. B26, 4883 (1982)

    work page 1982

  78. [78]

    Sooryakumar and M

    R. Sooryakumar and M. V. Klein, Raman scattering by superconducting-gap excitations and their coupling to 8 charge-density waves, Phys. Rev. Lett.45, 660 (1980)

    work page 1980

  79. [79]

    M. A. Measson, Y. Gallais, M. Cazayous, B. Clair, P. Rodiere, L. Cario, and A. Sacuto, Amplitude Higgs mode in the 2H-NbSe2 superconductor, Phys. Rev. B 89, 060503 (2014)

    work page 2014

  80. [80]

    Grasset, T

    R. Grasset, T. Cea, Y. Gallais, M. Cazayous, A. Sacuto, L. Cario, L. Benfatto, and M.-A. Measson, Higgs-mode radiance and charge-density-wave order in 2H-NbSe2, Phys. Rev. B97, 094502 (2018)

    work page 2018

Showing first 80 references.