pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.15673 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-17 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · gr-qc

Recognition: unknown

Circular polarization images of Sgr A* for different magnetic field geometries

Hao Yin , Songbai Chen , Jiliang Jing
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 09:16 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE gr-qc
keywords Sgr A*circular polarizationmagnetic field geometryRIAF modelALMA observationspolarized radiative transferKerr spacetimeblack hole accretion
0
0 comments X

The pith

ALMA circular polarization data excludes reversed magnetic field models for Sgr A* at high inclinations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper uses a stationary semi-analytic RIAF model in Kerr spacetime to compute 230 GHz circular polarization images for six different poloidal magnetic field geometries. It finds that Faraday conversion dominates CP production in radial, parabolic, quadrupole, and combined fields, while intrinsic emission dominates in dipole and vertical fields. Radial and parabolic geometries yield polarity-invariant net CP, whereas dipole and vertical fields produce polarity-sensitive net CP. High black hole spin reduces CP levels for prograde disks, and net CP is near zero for most edge-on views except the quadrupole case. Matching the persistent negative CP observed by ALMA rules out reversed-field models at high inclinations and thereby constrains the magnetic geometry in Sgr A*.

Core claim

Using polarized radiative transfer through a stationary RIAF in Kerr spacetime, the authors map CP signatures across radial, parabolic, quadrupole, combined, dipole, and vertical poloidal field configurations. CP arises mainly from Faraday conversion in four geometries and from intrinsic emission in the dipole and vertical cases. Radial and parabolic fields produce net CP whose sign is independent of field polarity, while dipole and vertical fields produce net CP whose sign flips with polarity. High spin lowers CP production for prograde disks. Edge-on net CP is near zero except for the quadrupole geometry. Direct comparison with ALMA's negative CP signal excludes reversed-field models at高高高

What carries the argument

Six poloidal magnetic field configurations (radial, parabolic, quadrupole, combined, dipole, vertical) computed with polarized radiative transfer in a semi-analytic RIAF model embedded in Kerr spacetime.

If this is right

  • Radial and parabolic geometries produce net CP whose sign is invariant under field polarity reversal.
  • Dipole and vertical geometries produce net CP whose sign changes with field polarity.
  • CP production drops at high black hole spin when the disk is prograde.
  • Net CP vanishes for edge-on views except in the quadrupole geometry.
  • Reversed-field models are ruled out at high inclinations by the ALMA negative CP detection.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Higher-resolution polarimetric imaging could separate the remaining allowed geometries once the reversed-field case is removed.
  • If the real flow is strongly time-variable, time-dependent simulations would be needed to check whether the stationary-model exclusions still hold.
  • The same polarized-transfer approach could be applied to other low-luminosity black holes with CP measurements to map their magnetic structures.

Load-bearing premise

The accretion flow around Sgr A* is accurately captured by a stationary semi-analytic RIAF model in Kerr spacetime without significant time variability or non-ideal MHD effects.

What would settle it

A future measurement of positive net circular polarization or a different sign pattern at high inclinations with ALMA or higher-resolution arrays would contradict the exclusion of reversed-field models.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.15673 by Hao Yin, Jiliang Jing, Songbai Chen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: The images of Stokes V for the fiducial parameters with various magnetic field configurations. The upper (lower) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: The resolved CP fraction [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: The images of Stokes I and V across spin for various magnetic field geometries, inclination 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Dependence of net CP [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: The image of Stokes V with various magnetic field geometries for spin +0.5, disk thickness 0.5, inclination 90 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Dependence of net circular polarization fraction [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Same as Figure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Sgr A* exhibits a persistent negative circular polarization (CP) at 230\,GHz, offering a powerful probe of the magnetic field geometry in its accretion flow. Using a stationary semi-analytic radiatively inefficient accretion flow (RIAF) model in Kerr spacetime with polarized radiative transfer, we systematically analyze CP images for six poloidal magnetic field configurations across varying black hole spins, inclinations, and field polarities. We find that CP production is dominated by Faraday conversion in radial, parabolic, quadrupole, and combined geometries, but by intrinsic emission in dipole and vertical fields. The radial and parabolic configurations produce the polarity-invariant net CP, while dipole and vertical fields yield the polarity-sensitive one. As the accretion disk is prograde with respect to the black hole spin, the CP production across all six field geometries is found to be lower at high spin case, while the situation is more complicated in the retrograde case. Moreover, the net CP observed from edge-on views $V_{\rm net} \approx 0$ except for the quadrupole geometry. Comparing with ALMA data, the reversed-field model is excluded at high inclinations and then the magnetic field geometry of Sgr A* is constrained.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims that by modeling circular polarization images of Sgr A* using a stationary semi-analytic RIAF in Kerr spacetime for six poloidal magnetic field geometries, and comparing the net CP with ALMA observations of persistent negative CP at 230 GHz, the reversed-field models can be excluded at high inclinations, thereby constraining the magnetic field geometry of Sgr A*. The analysis shows CP production dominated by Faraday conversion in some geometries and intrinsic emission in others, with polarity sensitivity varying accordingly, and lower CP at high spin for prograde disks.

Significance. If the results hold, this systematic study of CP for different field geometries offers valuable insights into using polarization observations to probe the magnetic structure in Sgr A*'s accretion flow. The distinction between polarity-invariant (radial, parabolic) and polarity-sensitive (dipole, vertical) geometries, along with the spin and inclination dependencies, could help interpret future high-resolution data from EHT and ALMA. The semi-analytic approach allows broad exploration, but its significance depends on how well the stationary model captures the essential physics.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The central claim that 'the reversed-field model is excluded at high inclinations' (abstract) lacks supporting quantitative details such as the computed V_net values for each geometry, their comparison to ALMA's measured CP, or any statistical measure of agreement. Without these, the exclusion and subsequent geometry constraint cannot be fully evaluated.
  2. [RIAF modeling and results] The exclusion relies on the assumption that the stationary RIAF model's net CP faithfully represents the observed value. However, Sgr A* is known to be highly variable, and the paper does not address how time-dependent effects or turbulent fields in full GRMHD might alter the CP sign for reversed polarity cases, which is load-bearing for the high-inclination exclusion.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The phrasing 'and then the magnetic field geometry of Sgr A* is constrained' is vague; specify which geometries are favored or disfavored based on the comparison.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and insightful comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below and outline the revisions we will make to strengthen the paper.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] The central claim that 'the reversed-field model is excluded at high inclinations' (abstract) lacks supporting quantitative details such as the computed V_net values for each geometry, their comparison to ALMA's measured CP, or any statistical measure of agreement. Without these, the exclusion and subsequent geometry constraint cannot be fully evaluated.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract, being concise by nature, does not include explicit numerical values or statistical comparisons. The manuscript body provides these details through systematic calculations of V_net for all six field geometries (shown in figures and discussed in the results), demonstrating the inconsistency of reversed-field models with ALMA's persistent negative CP at high inclinations. To address the concern, we will revise the abstract to incorporate a brief quantitative summary of the key V_net comparisons and the basis for exclusion, while keeping within length limits and directing readers to the full analysis. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [RIAF modeling and results] The exclusion relies on the assumption that the stationary RIAF model's net CP faithfully represents the observed value. However, Sgr A* is known to be highly variable, and the paper does not address how time-dependent effects or turbulent fields in full GRMHD might alter the CP sign for reversed polarity cases, which is load-bearing for the high-inclination exclusion.

    Authors: We acknowledge this as a genuine limitation of the stationary semi-analytic RIAF framework, which is designed for broad exploration of field geometries but cannot capture time variability or turbulence. The persistent sign of the observed CP across ALMA epochs provides some justification for using the time-averaged model, but we cannot definitively rule out sign changes in full GRMHD. We will add a new paragraph in the discussion section explicitly addressing this caveat, the potential effects of variability on CP polarity, and the value of future GRMHD comparisons to test the robustness of the high-inclination exclusion. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; external ALMA benchmark keeps derivation independent

full rationale

The paper generates CP images and net V values from a stationary semi-analytic RIAF model in Kerr spacetime with polarized radiative transfer, varying spin, inclination, and field polarity across six geometries. These outputs are then compared directly to independent ALMA observations of persistent negative CP at 230 GHz to exclude reversed-field models at high inclinations. No parameters are fitted to the target polarization data, no self-definitional loops exist (e.g., no prediction of the same fitted quantity), and no load-bearing uniqueness theorems or ansatzes are imported via self-citation. The derivation chain therefore contains independent content from the model assumptions and the external observational constraint.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the stationary RIAF model, polarized radiative transfer in Kerr spacetime, and the assumption that the observed ALMA circular polarization is produced entirely within the modeled flow; no new entities are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • black hole spin parameter a
    Varied across prograde and retrograde cases; not fitted to polarization data but explored parametrically.
  • observer inclination
    Varied to produce edge-on and other views; affects net CP predictions.
axioms (2)
  • standard math Kerr metric describes the spacetime around Sgr A*
    Used as the background geometry for the RIAF model.
  • domain assumption Stationary semi-analytic RIAF accurately represents the accretion flow
    Core modeling choice stated in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5510 in / 1558 out tokens · 51931 ms · 2026-05-10T09:16:03.483767+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Radial (split monopole) [37]: Aϕ,R = 1− |cosθ|.(12)

  2. [2]

    Vertical [38]: Aϕ,V =rsinθ.(13)

  3. [3]

    In the equatorial plane, this field is predominantly vertical

    Dipole [39]: Aϕ,D = 1 2 ((r+r 0)νF− + 2F+(1−ln(F +))),(14) whereF ± = 1±cosµ θ, with parametersν= 3/4, µ= 4, andr 0 = 4r g. In the equatorial plane, this field is predominantly vertical. 4 75 50 25 0 25 50 75 FOV ( as) vnet = 1.15 % combined vnet = 0.749 % dipole vnet = 0.876 % parabolic vnet = 2.13 % quadrupole vnet = 1.65 % radial vnet = 1.27 % vertical...

  4. [4]

    Quadrupole [39]: Aϕ,Q =A ϕ,D cosθ.(15)

  5. [5]

    Fork= 0, this expres- sion reduces to the radial (split monopole) field

    Parabolic [40]: Aϕ,P =r k(1− |cosθ|) =r kAϕ,R,(16) where we setk= 0.75. Fork= 0, this expres- sion reduces to the radial (split monopole) field

  6. [6]

    This field asymptotes to a constant vertical field at large distances

    Combined Field [41]: A self-consistent solution to Maxwell’s equations in Kerr spacetime com- bining the vertical homogeneous solution [42] and the radial split-monopole: Aϕ,C =g ϕϕ + 2agtϕ +p 0 (r2+2)|cosθ| r2 +a 2 cos2 θ .(17) Here,p 0 controls the ratio of the radial to vertical magnetic field components. This field asymptotes to a constant vertical fi...

  7. [7]

    2019, ApJL, 875, L1, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7 Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration, Akiyama, K.,

    K. Akiyama, et al., First M87 Event Horizon Tele- scope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole. Astrophys. J. Lett.875(1), L1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7 2019

  8. [8]

    2022, ApJL, 930, L12, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac6674

    K. Akiyama, et al., First Sagittarius A* Event Hori- zon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Su- permassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way. Astrophys. J. Lett.930(2), L12 (2022).https: //doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ac6674

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac6674 2022

  9. [9]

    Akiyama, et al., First M87 Event Horizon Tele- scope Results

    K. Akiyama, et al., First M87 Event Horizon Tele- scope Results. VII. Polarization of the Ring. Astro- phys. J. Lett.910(1), L12 (2021).https://doi.org/ 10.3847/2041-8213/abe71d

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abe71d 2021

  10. [10]

    Akiyama, et al., First Sagittarius A* Event Hori- zon Telescope Results

    K. Akiyama, et al., First Sagittarius A* Event Hori- zon Telescope Results. VII. Polarization of the Ring. Astrophys. J. Lett.970(2), L24 (2024).https://doi. org/10.3847/2041-8213/ad5bdb

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad5bdb 2024

  11. [11]

    Akiyama, et al., First Sagittarius A* Event Hori- zon Telescope Results

    K. Akiyama, et al., First Sagittarius A* Event Hori- zon Telescope Results. V. Testing Astrophysical Mod- els of the Galactic Center Black Hole. Astrophys. J. Lett.930(2), L16 (2022).https://doi.org/10. 3847/2041-8213/ac6672

    2022

  12. [12]

    S. Chen, J. Jing, W.L. Qian, B. Wang, Black hole images: A review. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 66(6), 260401 (2023).https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11433-022-2059-5

    2023

  13. [13]

    C. Chen, Q. Pan, J. Jing, Near-horizon polarized images of a rotating hairy Horndeski black hole. JCAP04, 024 (2026).https://doi.org/10.1088/ 1475-7516/2026/04/024

    2026

  14. [14]

    X. Qin, F. Long, S. Chen, J. Jing, Polarized image of an equatorial emitting ring around a Konoplya-Zhidenko rotating non-Kerr black hole (2025). arXiv:2512.22764

    work page arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    2023, ApJL, 957, L20, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acff70

    K. Akiyama, et al., First M87 Event Horizon Tele- scope Results. IX. Detection of Near-horizon Circular Polarization. Astrophys. J. Lett.957(2), L20 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/acff70

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acff70 2023

  16. [16]

    Ricarte, R

    A. Ricarte, R. Qiu, R. Narayan, Black Hole Magnetic Fields and Their Imprint on Circular Polarization Im- ages. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.505(1), 523–539 (2021).https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab1289

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1289 2021

  17. [17]

    Tsunetoe, S

    Y. Tsunetoe, S. Mineshige, K. Ohsuga, T. Kawashima, K. Akiyama, Dominance of toroidal magnetic fields in the circular polarization image of M87*. Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn.73(4), 912–924 (2021).https://doi.org/10.1093/pasj/psab054

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psab054 2021

  18. [18]

    Mo´ scibrodzka, A

    M. Mo´ scibrodzka, A. Janiuk, M. De Laurentis, Un- raveling circular polarimetric images of magnetically arrested accretion flows near event horizon of a black hole. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.508(3), 4282–4295 (2021).https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab2790

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2790 2021

  19. [19]

    Wilson, K.W

    A.S. Wilson, K.W. Weiler, Are the pc-scale jets in ac- tive galactic nuclei composed of an electron-positron plasma? Astrophys. J.475, 661–684 (1997).https: //doi.org/10.1086/303581

    work page doi:10.1086/303581 1997

  20. [20]

    Anantua, R

    R. Anantua, R. Emami, A. Loeb, A. Chael, Deter- mining the Composition of Relativistic Jets from Po- larization Maps. Astrophys. J.896(1), 30 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab9103

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab9103 2020

  21. [24]

    Beckert, H

    T. Beckert, H. Falcke, Circular polarization of radio emission from relativistic jets. Astron. Astrophys. 388, 1106–1119 (2002).https://doi.org/10.1051/ 0004-6361:20020484

    2002

  22. [26]

    N., et al

    G.N. Wong, B.S. Prather, V. Dhruv, B.R. Ryan, M. Mo’scibrodzka, C.K. Chan, A.V. Joshi, R. Yarza, A. Ricarte, H. Shiokawa, J.C. Dolence, S.C. Noble, J.C. McKinney, C.F. Gammie, PATOKA: Simulat- ing Electromagnetic Observables of Black Hole Ac- cretion. Astrophys. J. Suppl.259(2), 64 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/ac582e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac582e 2022

  23. [27]

    2022, ApJL, 924, L32, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac46a1

    B. Ripperda, M. Liska, K. Chatterjee, G. Mu- soke, A.A. Philippov, S.B. Markoff, A. Tchekhovskoy, Z. Younsi, Black Hole Flares: Ejection of Accreted Magnetic Flux through 3D Plasmoid-mediated Re- connection. Astrophys. J. Lett.924(2), L32 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ac46a1

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac46a1 2022

  24. [28]

    Wielgus, A

    Saurabh, M. Wielgus, A. Tursunov, A.P. Lobanov, R. Emami, Semi-analytic studies of the accretion disk and magnetic field geometry in M 87*. Astron. Astro- phys.705, A166 (2025).https://doi.org/10.1051/ 0004-6361/202556880

    2025

  25. [29]

    X. Wang, S. Chen, M. Guo, B. Chen, Semianalyti- cal study on polarized images of a black hole due to frame dragging. Phys. Rev. D113(2), 024033 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1103/ys9s-8nw2

    work page doi:10.1103/ys9s-8nw2 2026

  26. [30]

    F. Long, W. Deng, X. Qin, S. Chen, J. Jing, The images of Brans-Dicke-Kerr type naked singularities*. Chin. Phys.50(2), 025108 (2026).https://doi.org/ 10.1088/1674-1137/ae2f50. 2511.01478

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-1137/ae2f50 2026

  27. [31]

    Hamaker, J.D

    J.P. Hamaker, J.D. Bregman, Understanding Radio Polarimetry. III. Interpreting the IAU/IEEE Defini- tions of the Stokes Parameters. Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser.117, 161–165 (1996).https://doi.org/ 10.1051/aas:1996147

    work page doi:10.1051/aas:1996147 1996

  28. [32]

    Dexter, A public code for general relativistic, po- larised radiative transfer around spinning black holes

    J. Dexter, A public code for general relativistic, po- larised radiative transfer around spinning black holes. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.462(1), 115–136 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw1526

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1526 2016

  29. [33]

    Mbarek and D

    A.V. Joshi, B.S. Prather, C.k. Chan, M. Wiel- gus, C.F. Gammie, Circular Polarization of Simu- lated Images of Black Holes. Astrophys. J.972(2), 135 (2024).https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ ad5b51[astro-ph.HE] 12

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ 2024

  30. [34]

    , year = 1963, month = sep, volume =

    R.P. Kerr, Gravitational Field of a Spinning Mass as an Example of Algebraically Special Metrics. Phys. Rev. Lett.11(5), 237–238 (1963).https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.11.237

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.11.237 1963

  31. [35]

    H.Y. Pu, A.E. Broderick, Probing the Innermost Ac- cretion Flow Geometry of Sgr A* with Event Hori- zon Telescope. Astrophys. J.863(2), 148 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aad086

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aad086 2018

  32. [36]

    H.Y. Pu, K. Akiyama, K. Asada, The Effects of Ac- cretion Flow Dynamics on the Black Hole Shadow of Sagittarius A*. Astrophys. J.831(1), 4 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/831/1/4

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/831/1/4 2016

  33. [37]

    H. Yin, S. Chen, J. Jing, Bright ring features and polarization structures in Kerr-Sen black hole images illuminated by radiatively inefficient accretion flows (2025). arXiv:2507.03857 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  34. [38]

    Vincent, S.E

    F.H. Vincent, S.E. Gralla, A. Lupsasca, M. Wiel- gus, Images and photon ring signatures of thick disks around black holes. Astron. Astrophys. 667, A170 (2022).https://doi.org/10.1051/ 0004-6361/202244339

    2022

  35. [39]

    Zhang, S

    Z. Zhang, S. Chen, J. Jing, Images of Kerr-MOG black holes surrounded by geometrically thick magne- tized equilibrium tori. JCAP09, 027 (2024).https: //doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2024/09/027

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/09/027 2024

  36. [40]

    Modeling Extragalactic Foregrounds and Secondaries for Un- biased Estimation of Cosmological Parameters from Primary Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropy

    A.E. Broderick, V.L. Fish, S.S. Doeleman, A. Loeb, Evidence for Low Black Hole Spin and Physically Mo- tivated Accretion Models from Millimeter-VLBI Ob- servations of Sagittarius A*. Astrophys. J.735(2), 110 (2011).https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/ 735/2/110

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/ 2011

  37. [41]

    2004, MNRAS, 351, 1379, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07876.x

    S.S. Komissarov, Electrodynamics of black hole magnetospheres. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 350(2), 427–448 (2004).https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1365-2966.2004.07598.x

    work page arXiv 2004

  38. [42]

    Komissarov, Electrically charged black holes and the Blandford–Znajek mechanism

    S.S. Komissarov, Electrically charged black holes and the Blandford–Znajek mechanism. Mon. Not. R. As- tron. Soc.512(2), 2798–2805 (2022).https://doi. org/10.1093/mnras/stab2686

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2686 2022

  39. [43]

    , keywords =

    R.D. Blandford, R.L. Znajek, Electromagnetic extrac- tion of energy from Kerr black holes. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.179(3), 433–456 (1977).https: //doi.org/10.1093/mnras/179.3.433

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/179.3.433 1977

  40. [44]

    J. Vos, M. Moscibrodzka, M. Wielgus, Polarimetric signatures of hot spots in black hole accretion flows. Astron. Astrophys.668, A185 (2022).https://doi. org/10.1051/0004-6361/202244840

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244840 2022

  41. [45]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters408(1), L36–L40 (2010)

    J.C. McKinney, R.D. Blandford, Stability of rela- tivistic jets from rotating, accreting black holes via fully three-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic simu- lations. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.394, L126–L130 (2009).https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3933. 2009.00625.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933 2009

  42. [46]

    Tchekhovskoy, R

    A. Tchekhovskoy, R. Narayan, J.C. McKinney, Black Hole Spin and the Radio Loud/Quiet Dichotomy of Active Galactic Nuclei. Astrophys. J.711(1), 50–63 (2010).https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/711/ 1/50

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/711/ 2010

  43. [47]

    Kenzhebayeva, S

    S. Kenzhebayeva, S. Toktarbay, A. Tursunov, M. Koloˇ s, Combined effect of gravity and magnetic field of compact object immersed into dark matter. Phys. Rev. D109, 063005 (2024).https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.063005

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.063005 2024

  44. [48]

    Wald, Black hole in a uniform magnetic field

    R.M. Wald, Black hole in a uniform magnetic field. Phys. Rev. D10(6), 1680–1685 (1974).https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevD.10.1680

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.10.1680 1974

  45. [49]

    F., McKinney, J

    C.F. Gammie, J.C. McKinney, G. T´ oth, HARM: A Numerical Scheme for General Relativistic Magne- tohydrodynamics. Astrophys. J.589(1), 444–457 (2003).https://doi.org/10.1086/374594

    work page doi:10.1086/374594 2003

  46. [50]

    Marszewski, B.S

    A. Marszewski, B.S. Prather, A.V. Joshi, A. Pandya, C.F. Gammie, ipole: semianalytic scheme for rel- ativistic polarized radiative transport. Astrophys. J.921(1), 17 (2021).https://doi.org/10.3847/ 1538-4357/ac1b28

    2021

  47. [51]

    Perego, A

    R. Abuter, et al., Detection of the gravitational red- shift in the orbit of the star S2 near the Galactic centre massive black hole. Astron. Astrophys.615, L15 (2018).https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/ 201834294

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/ 2018

  48. [53]

    2022, ApJL, 930, L13, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac6675

    K. Akiyama, et al., First Sagittarius A* Event Hori- zon Telescope Results. II. EHT and Multiwavelength Observations, Data Processing, and Calibration. As- trophys. J. Lett.930(2), L13 (2022).https://doi. org/10.3847/2041-8213/ac6675

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac6675 2022

  49. [54]

    G., Yuan, W., Macri, L

    M. Wielgus, et al., Millimeter Light Curves of Sagit- tarius A* Observed during the 2017 Event Horizon Telescope Campaign. Astrophys. J. Lett.930(2), L19 (2022).https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ ac6428

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ 2017