pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.15920 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-17 · 🪐 quant-ph · math-ph· math.MP

Local qubit invariants on quantum computer

Szil\'ard Szalay , Fr\'ed\'eric Holweck This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 08:16 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph math-phmath.MP
keywords quantum circuitslocal unitary invariantsentanglement measuresthree-qubit systemsdirect measurementquantum computingIBM Quantum
0
0 comments X

The pith

Two methods enable direct measurement of local unitary invariants on quantum computers.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops two general approaches for constructing quantum circuits that measure local unitary invariants directly rather than through full state reconstruction. Local unitary invariants are quantities unchanged under independent operations on each qubit and include key entanglement measures for three-qubit systems. Implementing these circuits allows assessment of such properties on actual quantum hardware, as shown through demonstrations on the IBM Quantum Platform. A reader would care because direct measurement reduces the need for resource-intensive tomography and supports practical characterization of multipartite entanglement. The work focuses on three-qubit cases but frames the methods as broadly applicable.

Core claim

We present two general methods to implement quantum circuits for the direct measuring of local unitary invariants on quantum computers. We work these out for important three-qubit invariants, and also demonstrate these on the IBM Quantum Platform for important entanglement measures of three qubits.

What carries the argument

Quantum circuits that directly extract local unitary invariants by measuring specific observables tied to the invariant expressions.

Load-bearing premise

The constructed circuits faithfully implement the mathematical definition of the invariants on noisy quantum hardware.

What would settle it

Run the circuits on known three-qubit states such as the GHZ state or W state and compare measured invariant values against exact analytic results; significant deviation would falsify correct implementation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.15920 by Fr\'ed\'eric Holweck, Szil\'ard Szalay.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Quantum circuits implementing the two-qubit norm￾squared (3a). two copies are needed. Index contraction can be done by acting with the bra P1 ij=0 δij ⟨ij|  = ⟨00| + ⟨11| = √ 2 ⟨Bell0| on the respective qubits, which can be achieved by the B† adjoint of the Bell state preparing unitary (9) B = |Bell0⟩ ⟨00| + |Bell1⟩ ⟨01| + |Bell3⟩ ⟨10| + i |Bell2⟩ ⟨11| = C(H ⊗ I), then selecting the 00 outcome of the meas… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Quantum circuits implementing the two-qubit concurrence (3b). and using the outcome 1111 instead of 0000, we end up with (10b) p1111 = | ⟨1111|(B † ⊗ B † )(I ⊗ S ⊗ I)(Uψ ⊗ Uψ)|0000⟩ |2 = c 2 (ψ)/2 2 . Realizing that B† = (H ⊗ I)C, we can get rid of the swap too, as (10c) p1111 = | ⟨1111|(H ⊗ H ⊗ I ⊗ I)(C1,3 ⊗ C2,4)(Uψ ⊗ Uψ)|0000⟩ |2 = c 2 (ψ)/2 2 . (The quantum circuits implementing this method are shown i… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Quantum circuits implementing the three-qubit norm￾squared (14a). permutation, or with CNOTs, and gives p000000 = | ⟨000000| B †⊗3 (S(2,3,5,4) ⊗ I1,6)(Uψ ⊗ Uψ)|000000⟩ |2 = | ⟨000000|(H ⊗3 ⊗ I ⊗3 )(C1,4 ⊗ C2,5 ⊗ C3,6)(Uψ ⊗ Uψ)|000000⟩ |2 = n 4 (ψ)/2 3 . (17) (In this section we draw only the permutation variant of the larger circuits, since it is much more expressive, and the CNOT variant would take up too… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Quantum circuits implementing the three-tangle (14f). where Sσ is the unitary permutation operator implementing the permutation σ = (1, 5, 2)(3)(4, 7, 6)(8, 9, 11, 10)(12), and the CNOTs are Cs = C1,7 ⊗ C2,5 ⊗ C3,6 ⊗ C4,10 ⊗ C8,11 ⊗ C9,12. The invariant g 2 a (ψ) in (14d) can also be implemented in two ways. The index contraction scheme can be read off from (13b) and (14d), in the tensor |γa(ψ)⟩ there are … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Quantum circuits implementing the three-qubit g1(ψ) (14d). B† with the appropriate permutation, or with CNOTs, and gives p111100001111 = | ⟨111100001111|(B †⊗6 )(Sσ)(U ⊗2 ψ ⊗ Uψ ⊗2 )|00 . . . 0⟩ |2 = g1(ψ) 4 /2 6 , (21a) p011011011011 = | ⟨011011011011|(H ⊗4 ⊗ I ⊗3 ⊗ H ⊗2 ⊗ I ⊗3 ) (Cs)(U ⊗2 ψ ⊗ Uψ ⊗2 )|00 . . . 0⟩ |2 = g1(ψ) 4 /2 6 . (21b) Note that in the two variants of the circuit different outcomes giv… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Quantum circuits implementing the three-qubit local con￾currence c1(ψ) (14c). Uψ, U T ψ and U † ψ , a swap, and gives p000000 = | ⟨000000|(U † ψ ⊗ U T ψ )(S(1,4) ⊗ I2,3,5,6)(Y ⊗ I ⊗ I) ⊗2 (Uψ ⊗ Uψ)|000000⟩ |2 = c 4 1 (ψ)/2 2 . (22) Note that (S(2,5) ⊗I1,3,4,6)(I ⊗Y ⊗I) ⊗2 or (S(3,6) ⊗I1,2,4,5)(I ⊗I ⊗Y ) ⊗2 are to be used for c 2 2 (ψ) and c 2 3 (ψ), respectively, because of the permutation covariance of c … view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Quantum circuits implementing the three-qubit ω(ψ) (14e). p100100100100 = | ⟨100100100100|(H ⊗4 ⊗ I ⊗3 ⊗ H ⊗2 ⊗ I ⊗3 ) (Cs)(Uψ ⊗ Uψ ⊗ Uψ ⊗ Uψ)|00 . . . 0⟩ |2 = c1(ψ) 4 /2 2+6 . (23b) The invariant ω 2 (ψ) in (14e) can also be implemented in two ways. The index contraction scheme can be read off from (13e) and (14e), in the tensor |T(ψ)⟩ there are contractions with ϵ, then in the norm ∥T(ψ)∥ 2 = δii′δjj′δkk… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Quantum circuits implementing the preparations of the one-parameter families of three-qubit states (26). The usual representing elements of the classes are also covered, |ψ1|23⟩ = |ψ1|23(θ1|23)⟩ = [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Values of the invariants c 2 a (blue), ω 2 (green) and τ 2 (red) for the three one-parameter states (26). The exact values of the invari￾ants ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Measured values of the invariant τ 2 against the calculated values, using the smaller (18) and the larger (19) circuits. and 12 qubits, respectively. The measured values against the calculated values of τ 2 are shown in Figure (10). Here we can see the better performance of the smaller circuit. 4. Summary and remarks We have shown and illustrated two general methods for the implementation of the direct me… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present two general methods to implement quantum circuits for the direct measuring of local unitary invariants on quantum computers. We work these out for important three-qubit invariants, and also demonstrate these on the IBM Quantum Platform for important entanglement measures of three qubits.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents two general methods for implementing quantum circuits that directly measure local unitary invariants on quantum computers. It derives explicit circuit constructions for key three-qubit invariants and reports an experimental demonstration on the IBM Quantum Platform for three-qubit entanglement measures.

Significance. If the circuit constructions are correct, this work provides practical, hardware-accessible tools for extracting local unitary invariants that characterize entanglement and other properties of quantum states. The explicit three-qubit examples combined with an IBM demonstration constitute a concrete strength, offering a route to avoid full state tomography on near-term devices and enabling direct verification of invariants in experimental settings.

minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract refers to 'important three-qubit invariants' without naming them; adding the specific invariants (e.g., in the first paragraph of the introduction) would improve immediate readability.
  2. Figure captions for the circuit diagrams should explicitly state the gate decomposition and the measurement basis used to extract each invariant.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript, including the recognition that the circuit constructions (if correct) offer practical tools for extracting local unitary invariants without full tomography, and for recommending minor revision. No specific major comments were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is constructive and self-contained

full rationale

The paper presents two general methods for constructing quantum circuits that directly measure local unitary invariants. These methods are worked out explicitly for three-qubit cases using standard quantum information techniques, followed by an IBM Quantum hardware demonstration for entanglement measures. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or self-citation chain; the central claims consist of explicit circuit constructions whose validity is independently testable via the reported experiments. The derivation relies on established quantum circuit primitives rather than renaming known results or smuggling ansatzes via prior self-citations. This is the expected outcome for a methods-and-demonstration paper whose core contribution is the circuit design itself.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are identifiable from the abstract alone.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5322 in / 942 out tokens · 34994 ms · 2026-05-10T08:16:37.231237+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Quantum entanglement.Reviews of Modern Physics, 81(2):865–942, Jun 2009

    Ryszard Horodecki, Paweł Horodecki, Michał Horodecki, and Karol Horodecki. Quantum entanglement.Reviews of Modern Physics, 81(2):865–942, Jun 2009

    work page 2009

  2. [2]

    On multi-particle entanglement.Fortschritte der Physik, 46(4-5):567–578, 1998

    Noah Linden and Sandu Popescu. On multi-particle entanglement.Fortschritte der Physik, 46(4-5):567–578, 1998. 24 LOCAL QUBIT INV ARIANTS ON QUANTUM COMPUTER

    work page 1998

  3. [3]

    Computing local invariants of quantum-bit systems.Phys

    Markus Grassl, Martin Rötteler, and Thomas Beth. Computing local invariants of quantum-bit systems.Phys. Rev. A, 58:1833–1839, Sep 1998

    work page 1998

  4. [4]

    Unitary in- variants of qubit systems.Mathematical Structures in Computer Science, 17(6):1133–1151, 2007

    Jean-Gabriel Luque, Jean-Yves Thibon, and Frédéric Toumazet. Unitary in- variants of qubit systems.Mathematical Structures in Computer Science, 17(6):1133–1151, 2007

    work page 2007

  5. [5]

    Williamson, Marie Ericsson, Markus Johansson, Erik Sjöqvist, Anthony Sudbery, Vlatko Vedral, and William K

    Mark S. Williamson, Marie Ericsson, Markus Johansson, Erik Sjöqvist, Anthony Sudbery, Vlatko Vedral, and William K. Wootters. Geometric local invariants and pure three-qubit states.Phys. Rev. A, 83:062308, Jun 2011

    work page 2011

  6. [6]

    The invariant-comb approach and its re- lation to the balancedness of multipartite entangled states.New Journal of Physics, 12(7):075025, jul 2010

    Andreas Osterloh and Jens Siewert. The invariant-comb approach and its re- lation to the balancedness of multipartite entangled states.New Journal of Physics, 12(7):075025, jul 2010

    work page 2010

  7. [7]

    Multipartite-entanglement monotones and polynomial invariants.Physical Re- view A, 85:022301, Feb 2012

    Christopher Eltschka, Thierry Bastin, Andreas Osterloh, and Jens Siewert. Multipartite-entanglement monotones and polynomial invariants.Physical Re- view A, 85:022301, Feb 2012

    work page 2012

  8. [8]

    Invariant-based entanglement monotones as expectation values and their experimental detection.Phys

    Andreas Osterloh and Jens Siewert. Invariant-based entanglement monotones as expectation values and their experimental detection.Phys. Rev. A, 86:042302, Oct 2012

    work page 2012

  9. [9]

    Carteret, Noah Linden, Sandu Popescu, and Anthony Sudbery

    Hilary A. Carteret, Noah Linden, Sandu Popescu, and Anthony Sudbery. Mul- tiparticle entanglement.Foundations of Physics, 29(4):527–552, April 1999

    work page 1999

  10. [10]

    Multiparticle entanglement and its applications to cryptography

    Julia Kempe. Multiparticle entanglement and its applications to cryptography. Physical Review A, 60(2):910–916, 1999

    work page 1999

  11. [11]

    Wootters

    Valerie Coffman, Joydip Kundu, and William K. Wootters. Distributed entan- glement.Physical Review A, 61:052306, Apr 2000

    work page 2000

  12. [12]

    On local invariants of pure three-qubit states.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 34(3):643–652, 2001

    Anthony Sudbery. On local invariants of pure three-qubit states.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 34(3):643–652, 2001

    work page 2001

  13. [13]

    Polynomial invariants of four qubits

    Jean-Gabriel Luque and Jean-Yves Thibon. Polynomial invariants of four qubits. Phys. Rev. A, 67:042303, Apr 2003

    work page 2003

  14. [14]

    All maximally entangled four-qubit states

    Gilad Gour and Nolan R Wallach. All maximally entangled four-qubit states. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 51(11), 2010

    work page 2010

  15. [15]

    Proof of the Gour-Wallach conjecture.Phys- ical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 88(4):042307, 2013

    Lin Chen and Dragomir Ž Ðoković. Proof of the Gour-Wallach conjecture.Phys- ical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 88(4):042307, 2013

    work page 2013

  16. [16]

    All degree6local unitary invariants ofkqudits.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 45(6):065302, jan 2012

    Szilárd Szalay. All degree6local unitary invariants ofkqudits.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 45(6):065302, jan 2012

    work page 2012

  17. [17]

    The three kinds of three-qubit entanglement.arXiv [quant-ph], page 2511.07617, 2025

    Szilárd Szalay. The three kinds of three-qubit entanglement.arXiv [quant-ph], page 2511.07617, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    Hero and Jeb F

    Michael W. Hero and Jeb F. Willenbring. Stable Hilbert series as related to the measurement of quantum entanglement.Discrete Mathematics, 309(23):6508– 6514, 2009. LOCAL QUBIT INV ARIANTS ON QUANTUM COMPUTER 25

    work page 2009

  19. [19]

    Hero, Jeb F

    Michael W. Hero, Jeb F. Willenbring, and Lauren Kelly Williams. The measure- ment of quantum entanglement and enumeration of graph coverings. InRep- resentation theory and mathematical physics, volume 557 ofContemp. Math., pages 169–181. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2011

    work page 2011

  20. [20]

    Local unitary invariants for multipartite quantum systems.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 44(11):115302, feb 2011

    Péter Vrana. Local unitary invariants for multipartite quantum systems.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 44(11):115302, feb 2011

    work page 2011

  21. [21]

    On the algebra of local unitary invariants of pure and mixed quan- tum states.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 44(22):225304, may 2011

    Péter Vrana. On the algebra of local unitary invariants of pure and mixed quan- tum states.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 44(22):225304, may 2011

    work page 2011

  22. [22]

    Local unitary symmetries and entanglement invariants

    Markus Johansson. Local unitary symmetries and entanglement invariants. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 47(46):465301, 2014

    work page 2014

  23. [23]

    Luke Oeding and Ian Tan. Tensor decompositions with applications to local unitary and stochastic local operations and classical communication equivalence of multipartite pure states.SIAM Journal on Applied Algebra and Geometry, 9(1):33–57, 2025

    work page 2025

  24. [24]

    Tensor invariants for multipartite entanglement clas- sification

    Sylvain Carrozza, Johann Chevrier, and Luca Lionni. Tensor invariants for mul- tipartite entanglement classification.arXiv [math-ph], page 2604.02269, 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  25. [25]

    Experimentaltestofmermininequalities on a five-qubit quantum computer.Physical Review A, 94(1):012314, 2016

    DanielAlsinaandJoséIgnacioLatorre. Experimentaltestofmermininequalities on a five-qubit quantum computer.Physical Review A, 94(1):012314, 2016

    work page 2016

  26. [26]

    Experimental demonstration of the violations of Mermin’s and Svetlichny’s in- equalities for W and GHZ states.Quantum Information Processing, 18(7):218, 2019

    Manoranjan Swain, Amit Rai, Bikash K Behera, and Prasanta K Panigrahi. Experimental demonstration of the violations of Mermin’s and Svetlichny’s in- equalities for W and GHZ states.Quantum Information Processing, 18(7):218, 2019

    work page 2019

  27. [27]

    Performing quantum computing experiments in the cloud

    Simon J Devitt. Performing quantum computing experiments in the cloud. Physical Review A, 94(3):032329, 2016

    work page 2016

  28. [28]

    Testing quantum contextuality of binary symplectic polar spaces on a noisy intermediate scale quantum computer.Quantum Information Processing, 20(7):247, 2021

    Frédéric Holweck. Testing quantum contextuality of binary symplectic polar spaces on a noisy intermediate scale quantum computer.Quantum Information Processing, 20(7):247, 2021

    work page 2021

  29. [29]

    Four-qubit CHSH game

    Joaquim Jusseau, Hamza Jaffali, and Frédéric Holweck. Four-qubit CHSH game. Quantum Information Processing, 24(10):1–19, 2025

    work page 2025

  30. [30]

    Empirical demonstration of quantum con- textuality on NISQ computers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.21243, 2025

    Colm Kelleher and Frédéric Holweck. Empirical demonstration of quantum con- textuality on NISQ computers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.21243, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    Wood, Jake Lishman, Julien Gacon, Simon Martiel, Paul D

    Ali Javadi-Abhari, Matthew Treinish, Kevin Krsulich, Christopher J. Wood, Jake Lishman, Julien Gacon, Simon Martiel, Paul D. Nation, Lev S. Bishop, Andrew W. Cross, Blake R. Johnson, and Jay M. Gambetta. Quantum com- puting with Qiskit, 2024

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    Wootters

    William K. Wootters. Entanglement of formation of an arbitrary state of two qubits.Physical Review Letters, 80(10):2245–2248, Mar 1998. 26 LOCAL QUBIT INV ARIANTS ON QUANTUM COMPUTER

    work page 1998

  33. [33]

    Three qubits can be entangled in two inequivalent ways.Physical Review A, 62:062314, Nov 2000

    Wolfgang Dür, Guifré Vidal, and Juan Ignacio Cirac. Three qubits can be entangled in two inequivalent ways.Physical Review A, 62:062314, Nov 2000

    work page 2000

  34. [34]

    Method for direct detection of quantum entanglement.Phys

    Paweł Horodecki and Artur Ekert. Method for direct detection of quantum entanglement.Phys. Rev. Lett., 89:127902, Aug 2002

    work page 2002

  35. [35]

    Ekert, Carolina Moura Alves, Daniel K

    Artur K. Ekert, Carolina Moura Alves, Daniel K. L. Oi, Michał Horodecki, Paweł Horodecki, and L. C. Kwek. Direct estimations of linear and nonlinear functionals of a quantum state.Phys. Rev. Lett., 88:217901, May 2002

    work page 2002

  36. [36]

    Leifer, Noah Linden, and Andreas Winter

    Matthew S. Leifer, Noah Linden, and Andreas Winter. Measuring polynomial invariants of multiparty quantum states.Phys. Rev. A, 69:052304, May 2004

    work page 2004

  37. [37]

    López, Freddy Lastra, Enrique Solano, and Juan Carlos Retamal

    Guillermo Romero, Carlos E. López, Freddy Lastra, Enrique Solano, and Juan Carlos Retamal. Direct measurement of concurrence for atomic two-qubit pure states.Phys. Rev. A, 75:032303, Mar 2007

    work page 2007

  38. [38]

    Implementation and measurement of quantum entanglement using IBM quantum platforms.Physica Scripta, 99(4):045121, March 2024

    Naser Karimi, Seyed Navid Elyasi, and Marziyeh Yahyavi. Implementation and measurement of quantum entanglement using IBM quantum platforms.Physica Scripta, 99(4):045121, March 2024

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    Quantum circuit for the direct measurement of the three-tangle of three-qubit states.Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, 2022(9), July 2022

    Marziyeh Yahyavi, Mohammad Ali Jafarizadeh, Naser Karimi, and Ahmad Heshmati. Quantum circuit for the direct measurement of the three-tangle of three-qubit states.Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, 2022(9), July 2022

    work page 2022

  40. [40]

    Implementing direct three-tangle measurement of tripartite GHZ states on IBM quantum platforms

    Seyed Navid Elyasi, Marziyeh Yahyavi, and Naser Karimi. Implementing direct three-tangle measurement of tripartite GHZ states on IBM quantum platforms. Quantum Information Processing, 24(1), January 2025

    work page 2025

  41. [41]

    Adrián Pérez-Salinas, Diego García-Martín, Carlos Bravo-Prieto, and José I. Latorre. Measuring the tangle of three-qubit states.Entropy, 22, 2020

    work page 2020

  42. [42]

    Focus on quantum tomog- raphy.New Journal of Physics, 15(12):125020, 2013

    Konrad Banaszek, Marcus Cramer, and David Gross. Focus on quantum tomog- raphy.New Journal of Physics, 15(12):125020, 2013

    work page 2013

  43. [43]

    Quantum entanglement in finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces

    Szilárd Szalay. Quantum entanglement in finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces. arXiv [quant-ph], page 1302.4654, 2013

    work page arXiv 2013

  44. [44]

    Bennett, Herbert J

    Charles H. Bennett, Herbert J. Bernstein, Sandu Popescu, and Benjamin Schu- macher. Concentrating partial entanglement by local operations.Phys. Rev. A, 53:2046–2052, Apr 1996

    work page 2046

  45. [45]

    Duff, William Rubens, and Hajar Ebrahim

    Leron Borsten, Duminda Dahanayake, Michael J. Duff, William Rubens, and Hajar Ebrahim. Freudenthal triple classification of three-qubit entanglement. Physical Review A, 80:032326, Sep 2009

    work page 2009

  46. [46]

    Partial separability revisited: Necessary and sufficient criteria.Physical Review A, 86:032341, Sep 2012

    Szilárd Szalay and Zoltán Kökényesi. Partial separability revisited: Necessary and sufficient criteria.Physical Review A, 86:032341, Sep 2012

    work page 2012

  47. [47]

    Costa, Enric Jané, José I

    Antonio Acín, Alexander Andrianov, L. Costa, Enric Jané, José I. Latorre, and Rolf Tarrach. Generalized Schmidt decomposition and classification of three- quantum-bit states.Physical Review Letters, 85:1560–1563, Aug 2000. LOCAL QUBIT INV ARIANTS ON QUANTUM COMPUTER 27

    work page 2000

  48. [48]

    Three-qubit pure-state canonical forms.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 34(35):6725, aug 2001

    Antonio Acín, Alexander Andrianov, Enric Jané, and Rolf Tarrach. Three-qubit pure-state canonical forms.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 34(35):6725, aug 2001

    work page 2001

  49. [49]

    On the theory of linear transformations.Camb

    Arthur Cayley. On the theory of linear transformations.Camb. Math. J., 4:193– 209, 1845

    work page

  50. [50]

    Kapranov, and Andrey V

    Izrail’ Moiseevich Gel’fand, Mikhail M. Kapranov, and Andrey V. Zelevin- sky.Discriminants, resultants, and multidimensional determinants. Birkhäuser, Boston, 2008

    work page 2008

  51. [51]

    Geometry of three-qubit entanglement.Physical Review A, 71:012334, Jan 2005

    Péter Lévay. Geometry of three-qubit entanglement.Physical Review A, 71:012334, Jan 2005

    work page 2005

  52. [52]

    Freudenthal ranks: GHZ versus W.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 46(45):455303, oct 2013

    Leron Borsten. Freudenthal ranks: GHZ versus W.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 46(45):455303, oct 2013

    work page 2013

  53. [53]

    Duff, Hajar Ebrahim, and William Rubens

    Leron Borsten, Duminda Dahanayake, Michael J. Duff, Hajar Ebrahim, and William Rubens. Black holes, qubits and octonions.Phys. Rep., 471(3):113– 219, 2009

    work page 2009

  54. [54]

    Qubits from extra dimensions.Physical Review D, 84:125020, Dec 2011

    Péter Lévay. Qubits from extra dimensions.Physical Review D, 84:125020, Dec 2011

    work page 2011

  55. [55]

    Duff, and Péter Lévay

    Leron Borsten, Michael J. Duff, and Péter Lévay. The black-hole/qubit correspondence: an up-to-date review.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 29(22):224008, oct 2012

    work page 2012

  56. [56]

    Attractor mechanism as a distillation procedure

    Péter Lévay and Szilárd Szalay. Attractor mechanism as a distillation procedure. Physical Review D, 82:026002, Jul 2010

    work page 2010

  57. [57]

    STU attractors from vanishing concurrence

    Péter Lévay and Szilárd Szalay. STU attractors from vanishing concurrence. Physical Review D, 83:045005, Feb 2011

    work page 2011

  58. [58]

    Three fermions with six single-particle states can be entangled in two inequivalent ways.Physical Review A, 78:022329, Aug 2008

    Péter Lévay and Péter Vrana. Three fermions with six single-particle states can be entangled in two inequivalent ways.Physical Review A, 78:022329, Aug 2008

    work page 2008

  59. [59]

    Special entangled quantum systems and the Freudenthal construction.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 42(28):285303, jun 2009

    Péter Vrana and Péter Lévay. Special entangled quantum systems and the Freudenthal construction.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 42(28):285303, jun 2009

    work page 2009

  60. [60]

    Entanglement in fermionic Fock space.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 47(11):115304, feb 2014

    Gábor Sárosi and Péter Lévay. Entanglement in fermionic Fock space.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 47(11):115304, feb 2014

    work page 2014

  61. [61]

    Entanglement classification of three fermions with up to nine single-particle states.Physical Review A, 89:042310, Apr 2014

    Gábor Sárosi and Péter Lévay. Entanglement classification of three fermions with up to nine single-particle states.Physical Review A, 89:042310, Apr 2014

    work page 2014

  62. [62]

    Coffman-Kundu-Wootters inequality for fermions.Physical Review A, 90:052303, Nov 2014

    Gábor Sárosi and Péter Lévay. Coffman-Kundu-Wootters inequality for fermions.Physical Review A, 90:052303, Nov 2014

    work page 2014

  63. [63]

    Classification of multipartite systems fea- turing only|W⟩and|GHZ⟩genuine entangled states.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 49(8):085201, jan 2016

    Frédéric Holweck and Péter Lévay. Classification of multipartite systems fea- turing only|W⟩and|GHZ⟩genuine entangled states.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 49(8):085201, jan 2016

    work page 2016

  64. [64]

    Five two-qubit gates are necessary for implementing the Toffoli gate.Phys

    Nengkun Yu, Runyao Duan, and Mingsheng Ying. Five two-qubit gates are necessary for implementing the Toffoli gate.Phys. Rev. A, 88:010304, Jul 2013. 28 LOCAL QUBIT INV ARIANTS ON QUANTUM COMPUTER

    work page 2013

  65. [65]

    Geometric de- scriptions of entangled states by auxiliary varieties.Journal of mathematical physics, 53(10), 2012

    Frédéric Holweck, Jean-Gabriel Luque, and Jean-Yves Thibon. Geometric de- scriptions of entangled states by auxiliary varieties.Journal of mathematical physics, 53(10), 2012

    work page 2012

  66. [66]

    Classification of multipartite entangled states by multidimen- sional determinants.Physical Review A, 67(1):012108, 2003

    Akimasa Miyake. Classification of multipartite entangled states by multidimen- sional determinants.Physical Review A, 67(1):012108, 2003

    work page 2003

  67. [67]

    Entanglement of four qubit systems: A geometric atlas with polynomial compass I (the finite world).Journal of Mathematical Physics, 55(1), 2014

    Frédéric Holweck, Jean-Gabriel Luque, and Jean-Yves Thibon. Entanglement of four qubit systems: A geometric atlas with polynomial compass I (the finite world).Journal of Mathematical Physics, 55(1), 2014

    work page 2014

  68. [68]

    Entanglement of four-qubit systems: a geometric atlas with polynomial compass II (the tame world).Journal of Mathematical Physics, 58(2), 2017

    Frédéric Holweck, Jean-Gabriel Luque, and Jean-Yves Thibon. Entanglement of four-qubit systems: a geometric atlas with polynomial compass II (the tame world).Journal of Mathematical Physics, 58(2), 2017

    work page 2017

  69. [69]

    Entanglement classification with algebraic geometry.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 50(19):195303, 2017

    M Sanz, Daniel Braak, E Solano, and IL Egusquiza. Entanglement classification with algebraic geometry.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 50(19):195303, 2017

    work page 2017

  70. [70]

    Classifying entanglement by algebraic geometry.International Journal of Quantum Information, 22(03):2350047, 2024

    Masoud Gharahi. Classifying entanglement by algebraic geometry.International Journal of Quantum Information, 22(03):2350047, 2024

    work page 2024