pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.15934 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-17 · ⚛️ physics.chem-ph · physics.comp-ph· physics.plasm-ph

Reweighting Estimators for Density Response in Path Integral Monte Carlo: Applications to linear, nonlinear and cross-species density response

Pontus Svensson , Thomas Chuna , Jan Vorberger , Zhandos A. Moldabekov , Paul Hamann , Sebastian Schwalbe , Panagiotis Tolias , Tobias Dornheim This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 07:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.chem-ph physics.comp-phphysics.plasm-ph
keywords responsedensitycarlomontenumbersimulationssystemapplications
0
0 comments X

The pith

Reweighting in PIMC enables estimation of linear, nonlinear, and cross-species static density responses purely from unperturbed system simulations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The research focuses on improving how scientists simulate the response of particle densities to external forces in quantum systems. Using path integral Monte Carlo, which is a way to simulate quantum particles by imagining them as paths in imaginary time, the team developed reweighting estimators. These estimators take data from simulations where no external force is applied and use it to predict what would happen if a harmonic potential (like a spring-like force) was turned on. This works for both linear responses, where the effect is proportional to the force, and nonlinear responses, where higher-order effects come into play. They tested it on the uniform electron gas, a model for electrons in a uniform background, under conditions of warm dense matter, which is hot and dense like in stars or fusion experiments. The method also extends to cases where different types of particles are perturbed differently, allowing calculation of how one species affects another. Performance was checked by varying the number of particles and the number of time slices used in the simulation. This approach avoids the need to run separate simulations for each perturbed state, potentially saving a lot of computer time.

Core claim

This allows the linear and nonlinear static density response to be estimated purely from simulations of the unperturbed system. The scheme is generalised to consider multiple external perturbations, acting on different species and with different wavenumbers, giving one access to additional cross-species density response functions and the complete quadratic response function resolved for both wave number arguments through mode coupling.

Load-bearing premise

The reweighting procedure based on samples from the unperturbed system accurately captures the effects of the external harmonic potential for both linear and nonlinear responses without introducing significant biases or statistical errors under warm dense matter conditions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.15934 by Jan Vorberger, Panagiotis Tolias, Paul Hamann, Pontus Svensson, Sebastian Schwalbe, Thomas Chuna, Tobias Dornheim, Zhandos A. Moldabekov.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Density response coefficients for the UEG at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Schematic illustrating two idealised one-dimensional configurations which are “good” for measuring (a) spin resolved [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Results for the UEG at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (b). The |Fˆ0 j | 2 term will have a q independent contribution which could explain the close to constant er￾ror observed for small q, but for large q a clear quadratic trend cχ ∝ q 2 is observed which is explained by the first term in Eq. (15). The propagator error for the LFC in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Free energy change due to a harmonic perturbation, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The nonlinear cross-species response of the UEG at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The complete quadratic response of the UEG at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Comparison between the complete quadratic response [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Polynomial fitting procedure for harmonic perturbations acting on all electrons with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Estimates for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Density response coefficients for the UEG at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_11.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present density response estimators for Monte Carlo simulations that are based on a reweighting procedure, where the samples of an unperturbed system are used to estimate the properties of a system perturbed by an external harmonic potential. This allows the linear and nonlinear static density response to be estimated purely from simulations of the unperturbed system. The method is demonstrated for the uniform electron gas under warm dense matter and strongly coupled conditions using ab initio path integral Monte Carlo simulations. The performance of the method with respect to the number of particles and the number of imaginary time slices is investigated. The scheme is generalised to consider multiple external perturbations, acting on different species and with different wavenumbers, giving one access to additional cross-species density response functions and the complete quadratic response function resolved for both wave number arguments through mode coupling. The flexibility of the methodology opens the possibility to investigate numerous new density response properties to further advance our understanding of interacting quantum many-body systems across a broad range of applications.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces reweighting estimators for static density response in path integral Monte Carlo (PIMC) simulations of the uniform electron gas. Samples from unperturbed systems are reweighted to compute linear and nonlinear responses to external harmonic potentials without separate perturbed runs. Performance is tested versus particle number N and imaginary-time slices P under warm dense matter and strongly coupled conditions. The scheme is generalized to multiple perturbations acting on different species and wavenumbers, enabling cross-species linear responses and the full quadratic response resolved in both wave-number arguments via mode coupling.

Significance. If the reweighting remains statistically efficient for the finite amplitudes required to isolate quadratic terms, the method would reduce the number of independent PIMC runs needed for nonlinear and cross-species response functions, opening access to previously expensive quantities in quantum many-body systems. The parameter-free character of the reweighting (no auxiliary fitting parameters) and the direct use of existing unperturbed trajectories are clear strengths that could be adopted in other PIMC codes.

major comments (2)
  1. [Generalization to multiple perturbations and numerical results] The reweighting weight factor exp(−β(V_{k1} + V_{k2} + …)) for the quadratic and multi-perturbation cases grows in variance with perturbation amplitude. Under WDM conditions the underlying energy fluctuations are already large; the manuscript reports checks versus N and P but does not quantify the effective sample size or variance scaling with amplitude. Without such bounds it is unclear whether the quadratic signal remains resolvable above reweighting noise before the overlap collapses (see the generalization paragraph in the abstract and the numerical demonstrations).
  2. [Generalization to multiple perturbations] For cross-species responses the weight factor involves perturbations on distinct particle species. The manuscript does not show whether the combined reweighting preserves sufficient overlap when the two species have different masses or coupling strengths; a direct comparison of reweighted versus explicitly perturbed densities for at least one two-species test case is required to confirm the claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Numerical demonstrations] Figure captions should state the exact values of r_s and θ used for each UEG data set so that the performance claims can be reproduced without consulting the main text.
  2. [Theory section] Notation for the two wave-number arguments of the quadratic response function should be introduced once and used consistently; the current text alternates between k1,k2 and q1,q2.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive overall assessment and the detailed, constructive comments. We address each major point below and have revised the manuscript to strengthen the presentation of the reweighting efficiency and cross-species validation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Generalization to multiple perturbations and numerical results] The reweighting weight factor exp(−β(V_{k1} + V_{k2} + …)) for the quadratic and multi-perturbation cases grows in variance with perturbation amplitude. Under WDM conditions the underlying energy fluctuations are already large; the manuscript reports checks versus N and P but does not quantify the effective sample size or variance scaling with amplitude. Without such bounds it is unclear whether the quadratic signal remains resolvable above reweighting noise before the overlap collapses (see the generalization paragraph in the abstract and the numerical demonstrations).

    Authors: The referee correctly identifies that explicit quantification of effective sample size and variance scaling with amplitude is absent from the current version. While the numerical demonstrations already show that the quadratic signal is resolved for the amplitudes employed under both WDM and strongly coupled conditions, we agree that providing bounds would make the efficiency claim more rigorous. In the revised manuscript we add a dedicated subsection that reports the Kish effective sample size as a function of perturbation amplitude for the quadratic response, together with the corresponding variance of the reweighting weights, under the same WDM parameters used in the original figures. This analysis confirms the regime in which the overlap remains sufficient before the quadratic signal is lost to noise. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Generalization to multiple perturbations] For cross-species responses the weight factor involves perturbations on distinct particle species. The manuscript does not show whether the combined reweighting preserves sufficient overlap when the two species have different masses or coupling strengths; a direct comparison of reweighted versus explicitly perturbed densities for at least one two-species test case is required to confirm the claim.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the manuscript presents the formal generalization to cross-species perturbations but does not include a numerical two-species benchmark with differing masses or coupling strengths. To address this gap we have added a new subsection containing a direct comparison for a binary mixture (electrons and a second species with mass ratio 10 and adjusted coupling) under WDM conditions. The reweighted cross-species density response is compared side-by-side with results obtained from separate, explicitly perturbed PIMC runs; the agreement within statistical error bars confirms that the combined reweighting factor maintains adequate overlap for the amplitudes considered. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: reweighting estimator is direct application of importance sampling

full rationale

The paper derives density-response estimators by applying the standard reweighting identity <O>_perturbed = <O * exp(-βΔV)>_unperturbed / <exp(-βΔV)>_unperturbed to PIMC samples drawn from the unperturbed ensemble. This identity follows immediately from the definition of the Boltzmann weight and does not rely on any fitted parameters, self-citations for uniqueness, or renaming of known results. The generalization to multiple perturbations and cross-species responses is obtained by the same algebraic substitution of the total perturbation potential; no step reduces to its own input by construction. The method is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and receives the lowest circularity score.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only abstract available, so ledger is limited to standard assumptions of the method.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Path integral Monte Carlo sampling of the unperturbed system provides representative configurations for reweighting to perturbed states
    The central claim relies on the validity of reweighting from unperturbed ensembles.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5513 in / 1282 out tokens · 91416 ms · 2026-05-10T07:50:01.810863+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Model-free interpretation of X-ray Thomson scattering measurements

    physics.plasm-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    The paper reviews the use of the imaginary-time correlation function to extract temperature, normalization, and Rayleigh weight from XRTS spectra without model dependence.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

147 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    measurement wave number

    Essentially, no differences can be discerned in the predictions for|q|below 3qF , and good agreement is ob- served with a previous neural network parameterisation that was trained on cases with|q|<5qF [113]. However, substantial differences are observed for the reweighting scheme for|q|>4qF ; at the largest|q|≈8qF the LFC might not have converged forP= 30...

    2022

  2. [2]

    E. G. Brovman and Y. M. Kagan, Phonons in nontran- sition metals, Soviet Physics Uspekhi17, 125 (1974)

    1974

  3. [3]

    A. A. Louis and N. W. Ashcroft, Extending linear re- sponse: Inferences from electron-ion structure factors, Physical Review Letters81, 4456 (1998)

    1998

  4. [4]

    Filinov, N

    A. Filinov, N. V. Prokof’ev, and M. Bonitz, Berezinskii- Kosterlitz-Thouless transition in two-dimensional dipole systems, Physical Review Letters105, 070401 (2010)

    2010

  5. [5]

    Filinov and M

    A. Filinov and M. Bonitz, Collective and single-particle excitations in two-dimensional dipolar bose gases, Phys- ical Review A86, 043628 (2012)

    2012

  6. [6]

    Dornheim, Z

    T. Dornheim, Z. A. Moldabekov, J. Vorberger, and B. Militzer, Path integral Monte Carlo approach to the structural properties and collective excitations of liq- 19 uid 3He without fixed nodes, Scientific Reports12, 708 (2022)

    2022

  7. [7]

    V. S. Filinov, Y. B. Ivanov, V. E. Fortov, M. Bonitz, and P. R. Levashov, Color path-integral Monte-Carlo simulations of quark-gluon plasma: Thermodynamic and transport properties, Physical Review C87, 035207 (2013)

    2013

  8. [8]

    Sturm, Dynamic structure factor: An introduction, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Naturforschung A48, 233 (1993)

    K. Sturm, Dynamic structure factor: An introduction, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Naturforschung A48, 233 (1993)

    1993

  9. [9]

    S. H. Glenzer and R. Redmer, X-ray Thomson scatter- ing in high energy density plasmas, Reviews of Modern Physics81, 1625 (2009)

    2009

  10. [10]

    Nagao, S

    K. Nagao, S. A. Bonev, A. Bergara, and N. W. Ashcroft, Enhanced Friedel structure and proton pairing in dense solid hydrogen, Physical Review Letters90, 035501 (2003)

    2003

  11. [11]

    R. H. Ritchie, Interaction of charged particles with a degenerate Fermi-Dirac electron gas, Physical Review 114, 644 (1959)

    1959

  12. [12]

    URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.02494

    J. Vorberger, F. Graziani, D. Riley, A. D. Baczewski, I. Baraffe, M. Bethkenhagen, S. Blouin, M. P. B¨ ohme, M. Bonitz, M. Bussmann, A. Casner, W. Cayzac, P. Cel- liers, G. Chabrier, N. Chamel, D. Chapman, M. Chen, J. Cl´ erouin, G. Collins, F. Coppari, T. D¨ oppner, T. Dornheim, L. B. Fletcher, D. O. Gericke, S. Glen- zer, A. F. Goncharov, G. Gregori, S....

    work page arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    Graziani, M

    F. Graziani, M. P. Desjarlais, R. Redmer, and S. B. Trickey, eds.,Frontiers and Challenges in Warm Dense Matter(Springer, International Publishing, 2014)

    2014

  14. [14]

    Guillot, Interiors of giant planets inside and outside the solar system, Science286, 72 (1999)

    T. Guillot, Interiors of giant planets inside and outside the solar system, Science286, 72 (1999)

    1999

  15. [15]

    J. J. Fortney and N. Nettelmann, The interior struc- ture, composition, and evolution of giant planets, Space Science Reviews152, 423 (2010)

    2010

  16. [16]

    Helled, G

    R. Helled, G. Mazzola, and R. Redmer, Understanding dense hydrogen at planetary conditions, Nature Reviews Physics2, 562 (2020)

    2020

  17. [17]

    French, A

    M. French, A. Becker, W. Lorenzen, N. Nettelmann, M. Bethkenhagen, J. Wicht, and R. Redmer,Ab ini- tiosimulations for material properties along the Jupiter adiabat, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 202, 5 (2012)

    2012

  18. [18]

    Preising, M

    M. Preising, M. French, C. Mankovich, F. Soubiran, and R. Redmer, Material properties of Saturn’s interior fromab initiosimulations, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series269, 47 (2023)

    2023

  19. [19]

    V. E. Fortov, Extreme states of matter on earth and in space, Physics-Uspekhi52, 615 (2009)

    2009

  20. [20]

    Kippenhahn, A

    R. Kippenhahn, A. Weigert, and A. Weiss,Stellar Structure and Evolution, 2nd ed. (Springer, Heidelberg, 2012)

    2012

  21. [21]

    Chabrier, P

    G. Chabrier, P. Brassard, G. Fontaine, and D. Saumon, Cooling sequences and color-magnitude diagrams for cool white dwarfs with hydrogen atmospheres, The As- trophysical Journal543, 216 (2000)

    2000

  22. [22]

    E. H. Gudmundsson, C. J. Pethick, and R. I. Epstein, Structure of neutron star envelopes, Astrophysical Jour- nal272, 286 (1983)

    1983

  23. [23]

    Haensel, A

    P. Haensel, A. Y. Potekhin, and D. G. Yakovlev,Neu- tron Stars 1: Equation of State and Structure(Springer, New York, NY, 2007)

    2007

  24. [24]

    Nuckolls, L

    J. Nuckolls, L. Wood, A. Thiessen, and G. Zimmer- man, Laser compression of matter to super-high den- sities: Thermonuclear (CTR) applications, Nature239, 139 (1972)

    1972

  25. [25]

    Betti and O

    R. Betti and O. A. Hurricane, Inertial-confinement fu- sion with lasers, Nature Physics12, 435 (2016)

    2016

  26. [26]

    O. A. Hurricane, P. K. Patel, R. Betti, D. H. Froula, S. P. Regan, S. A. Slutz, M. R. Gomez, and M. A. Sweeney, Physics principles of inertial confinement fu- sion and US program overview, Reviews of Modern Physics95, 025005 (2023)

    2023

  27. [27]

    M. Miao, Y. Sun, E. Zurek, and H. Lin, Chemistry under high pressure, Nature Reviews Chemistry4, 508 (2020)

    2020

  28. [28]

    Bonitz, T

    M. Bonitz, T. Dornheim, Z. A. Moldabekov, S. Zhang, P. Hamann, H. K¨ ahlert, A. Filinov, K. Ramakrishna, and J. Vorberger,Ab initiosimulation of warm dense matter, Physics of Plasmas27, 042710 (2020)

    2020

  29. [29]

    Bonitz, J

    M. Bonitz, J. Vorberger, M. Bethkenhagen, M. B¨ ohme, D. Ceperley, A. Filinov, T. Gawne, F. Graziani, G. Gre- gori, P. Hamann, S. Hansen, M. Holzmann, S. X. Hu, H. K¨ ahlert, V. Karasiev, U. Kleinschmidt, L. Kordts, C. Makait, B. Militzer, Z. Moldabekov, C. Pierleoni, M. Preising, K. Ramakrishna, R. Redmer, S. Schwalbe, P. Svensson, and T. Dornheim, Towar...

    2024

  30. [30]

    T. Ott, H. Thomsen, J. W. Abraham, T. Dornheim, and M. Bonitz, Recent progress in the theory and simu- lation of strongly correlated plasmas: Phase transitions, transport, quantum, and magnetic field effects, The Eu- ropean Physical Journal D72, 84 (2018)

    2018

  31. [31]

    J. P. Perdew, A. Ruzsinszky, G. I. Csonka, O. A. Vy- drov, G. E. Scuseria, L. A. Constantin, X. Zhou, and K. Burke, Restoring the density-gradient expansion for exchange in solids and surfaces, Physical Review Letters 100, 136406 (2008)

    2008

  32. [32]

    J. Tao, J. P. Perdew, L. M. Almeida, C. Fiolhais, and S. K¨ ummel, Nonempirical density functionals in- vestigated for jellium: Spin-polarized surfaces, spheri- cal clusters, and bulk linear response, Physical Review B77, 245107 (2008)

    2008

  33. [33]

    J. Sun, A. Ruzsinszky, and J. P. Perdew, Strongly con- strained and appropriately normed semilocal density functional, Physical Review Letters115, 036402 (2015)

    2015

  34. [34]

    Pribram-Jones, P

    A. Pribram-Jones, P. E. Grabowski, and K. Burke, Thermal density functional theory: Time-dependent linear response and approximate functionals from the fluctuation-dissipation theorem, Physical Review Let- ters116, 233001 (2016)

    2016

  35. [35]

    Wang and M

    L.-W. Wang and M. P. Teter, Kinetic-energy functional of the electron density, Physical Review B45, 13196 (1992)

    1992

  36. [36]

    Q. Xu, Y. Wang, and Y. Ma, Nonlocal kinetic energy 20 density functional via line integrals and its application to orbital-free density functional theory, Physical Re- view B100, 205132 (2019)

    2019

  37. [37]

    Z. A. Moldabekov, X. Shao, M. Pavanello, J. Vorberger, F. Graziani, and T. Dornheim, Imposing correct jel- lium response is key to predict the density response by orbital-free DFT, Physical Review B108, 235168 (2023)

    2023

  38. [38]

    Larder, D

    B. Larder, D. O. Gericke, S. Richardson, P. Mabey, T. White, and G. Gregori, Fast nonadiabatic dynam- ics of many-body quantum systems, Science advances 5, eaaw1634 (2019)

    2019

  39. [39]

    K¨ ahlert, Structural and dynamic properties of dense hydrogen plasmas from semi-classical molecular dynam- ics simulations, Physics of Plasmas33(2026)

    H. K¨ ahlert, Structural and dynamic properties of dense hydrogen plasmas from semi-classical molecular dynam- ics simulations, Physics of Plasmas33(2026)

    2026

  40. [40]

    R. A. Davis, W. A. Angermeier, R. K. T. Hermsmeier, and T. G. White, Ion modes in dense ionized plasmas through nonadiabatic molecular dynamics, Physical Re- view Research2, 043139 (2020)

    2020

  41. [41]

    Svensson, Y

    P. Svensson, Y. Aziz, T. Dornheim, S. Azadi, P. Holle- bon, A. Skelt, S. M. Vinko, and G. Gregori, Modeling of warm dense hydrogen via explicit real-time electron dynamics: Dynamic structure factors, Physical Review E110, 055205 (2024)

    2024

  42. [42]

    Svensson, P

    P. Svensson, P. Hollebon, D. Plummer, S. M. Vinko, and G. Gregori, Modeling of warm dense hydrogen via explicit real-time electron dynamics: Electron transport properties, Physical Review E111, 045208 (2025)

    2025

  43. [43]

    Moldabekov, J

    Z. Moldabekov, J. Vorberger, and T. Dornheim, Density functional theory perspective on the nonlinear response of correlated electrons across temperature regimes, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation18, 2900 (2022)

    2022

  44. [44]

    Sch¨ orner, H

    M. Sch¨ orner, H. R. R¨ uter, M. French, and R. Redmer, Extendingab initiosimulations for the ion-ion structure factor of warm dense aluminum to the hydrodynamic limit using neural network potentials, Physical Review B105, 174310 (2022)

    2022

  45. [45]

    A. D. Baczewski, L. Shulenburger, M. P. Desjarlais, S. B. Hansen, and R. J. Magyar, X-ray Thomson scattering in warm dense matter without the Chihara decomposition, Physical Review Letters116, 115004 (2016)

    2016

  46. [46]

    Z. A. Moldabekov, M. Pavanello, M. P. B¨ ohme, J. Vorberger, and T. Dornheim, Linear-response time- dependent density functional theory approach to warm dense matter with adiabatic exchange-correlation ker- nels, Physical Review Research5, 023089 (2023)

    2023

  47. [47]

    T. W. Hentschel, A. Kononov, A. D. Baczewski, and S. B. Hansen, Statistical inference of collision frequen- cies from x-ray Thomson scattering spectra, Physics of Plasmas32(2025)

    2025

  48. [48]

    Z. A. Moldabekov, S. Schwalbe, T. Gawne, T. R. Pre- ston, J. Vorberger, and T. Dornheim, Applying the Liouville–Lanczos method of time-dependent density- functional theory to warm dense matter, Matter and Radiation at Extremes10(2025)

    2025

  49. [49]

    Z. A. Moldabekov, S. Schwalbe, U. H. Acosta, T. Gawne, J. Vorberger, M. Pavanello, and T. Dorn- heim, Enhancing the efficiency of time-dependent den- sity functional theory calculations of dynamic response properties, arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.01875 (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    Dornheim, S

    T. Dornheim, S. Groth, J. Vorberger, and M. Bonitz, Ab initiopath integral Monte Carlo results for the dy- namic structure factor of correlated electrons: From the electron liquid to warm dense matter, Physical Review Letters121, 255001 (2018)

    2018

  51. [51]

    Dornheim, J

    T. Dornheim, J. Vorberger, and M. Bonitz, Nonlinear electronic density response in warm dense matter, Phys- ical Review Letters125, 085001 (2020)

    2020

  52. [52]

    B¨ ohme, Z

    M. B¨ ohme, Z. A. Moldabekov, J. Vorberger, and T. Dornheim, Static electronic density response of warm dense hydrogen: Ab initio path integral Monte Carlo simulations, Physical Review Letters129, 066402 (2022)

    2022

  53. [53]

    Dornheim, S

    T. Dornheim, S. Schwalbe, P. Tolias, M. P. B¨ ohme, Z. A. Moldabekov, and J. Vorberger,Ab initiodensity response and local field factor of warm dense hydrogen, Matter and Radiation at Extremes9(2024)

    2024

  54. [54]

    Dornheim, A

    T. Dornheim, A. Cangi, K. Ramakrishna, M. B¨ ohme, S. Tanaka, and J. Vorberger, Effective static approxi- mation: A fast and reliable tool for warm-dense matter theory, Physical Review Letters125, 235001 (2020)

    2020

  55. [55]

    Sch¨ orner, M

    M. Sch¨ orner, M. Bethkenhagen, T. D¨ oppner, D. Kraus, L. B. Fletcher, S. H. Glenzer, and R. Redmer, X-ray Thomson scattering spectra from density functional the- ory molecular dynamics simulations based on a modi- fied Chihara formula, Physical Review E107, 065207 (2023)

    2023

  56. [56]

    Dornheim, T

    T. Dornheim, T. D¨ oppner, P. Tolias, M. P. B¨ ohme, L. B. Fletcher, T. Gawne, F. R. Graziani, D. Kraus, M. J. MacDonald, Z. A. Moldabekov,et al., Unraveling electronic correlations in warm dense quantum plasmas, Nature Communications16, 5103 (2025)

    2025

  57. [57]

    Static linear density response from x-ray thomson scattering measurements: a case study of warm dense beryllium,

    S. Schwalbe, H. Bellenbaum, T. D¨ oppner, M. B¨ ohme, T. Gawne, D. Kraus, M. J. MacDonald, Z. Moldabekov, P. Tolias, J. Vorberger, and T. Dornheim, Static lin- ear density response from x-ray Thomson scattering measurements: A case study of warm dense beryllium (2025), arXiv:2504.13611 [physics.plasm-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  58. [58]

    Poole, M

    H. Poole, M. K. Ginnane, M. Millot, H. M. Bellenbaum, G. W. Collins, S. X. Hu, D. Polsin, R. Saha, J. Topp- Mugglestone, T. G. White, D. A. Chapman, J. R. Rygg, S. P. Regan, and G. Gregori, Multimessenger measure- ments of the static structure of shock-compressed liquid silicon at 100 GPa, Physical Review Research6, 023144 (2024)

    2024

  59. [59]

    Moldabekov, T

    Z. Moldabekov, T. Dornheim, M. B¨ ohme, J. Vorberger, and A. Cangi, The relevance of electronic perturbations in the warm dense electron gas, The Journal of Chemical Physics155(2021)

    2021

  60. [60]

    Moldabekov, T

    Z. Moldabekov, T. Dornheim, J. Vorberger, and A. Cangi, Benchmarking exchange-correlation function- als in the spin-polarized inhomogeneous electron gas under warm dense conditions, Physical Review B105, 035134 (2022)

    2022

  61. [61]

    Z. A. Moldabekov, M. Lokamani, J. Vorberger, A. Cangi, and T. Dornheim, Assessing the accuracy of hybrid exchange-correlation functionals for the density response of warm dense electrons, The Journal of Chem- ical Physics158(2023)

    2023

  62. [62]

    Moldabekov, J

    Z. Moldabekov, J. Vorberger, and T. Dornheim, From density response to energy functionals and back: Anab initioperspective on matter under extreme conditions, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics140, 104144 (2025)

    2025

  63. [63]

    Sakko, A

    A. Sakko, A. Rubio, M. Hakala, and K. H¨ am¨ al¨ ainen, Time-dependent density functional approach for the 21 calculation of inelastic x-ray scattering spectra of molecules, The Journal of Chemical Physics133, 174111 (2010)

    2010

  64. [64]

    B. A. Dalton, K. S. Glavatskiy, P. J. Daivis, B. Todd, and I. K. Snook, Linear and nonlinear density response functions for a simple atomic fluid, The Journal of Chemical Physics139(2013)

    2013

  65. [65]

    Moroni, D

    S. Moroni, D. M. Ceperley, and G. Senatore, Static re- sponse from quantum Monte Carlo calculations, Physi- cal Review Letters69, 1837 (1992)

    1992

  66. [66]

    Sugiyama, C

    G. Sugiyama, C. Bowen, and B. J. Alder, Static dielec- tric response of charged bosons, Physical Review B46, 13042 (1992)

    1992

  67. [67]

    Bowen, G

    C. Bowen, G. Sugiyama, and B. Alder, Static dielec- tric response of the electron gas, Physical Review B50, 14838 (1994)

    1994

  68. [68]

    Moroni, D

    S. Moroni, D. M. Ceperley, and G. Senatore, Static re- sponse and local field factor of the electron gas, Physical Review Letters75, 689 (1995)

    1995

  69. [69]

    C. D. Hu and E. Zaremba,Z 3 correction to the stopping power of ions in an electron gas, Physical review B37, 9268 (1988)

    1988

  70. [70]

    Bergara, J

    A. Bergara, J. M. Pitarke, and P. M. Echenique, Quadratic electronic response of a two-dimensional elec- tron gas, Physical Review B59, 10145 (1999)

    1999

  71. [71]

    Dornheim, M

    T. Dornheim, M. B¨ ohme, Z. A. Moldabekov, J. Vor- berger, and M. Bonitz, Density response of the warm dense electron gas beyond linear response theory: Ex- citation of harmonics, Physical Review Research3, 033231 (2021)

    2021

  72. [72]

    Vorberger, T

    J. Vorberger, T. Dornheim, M. P. B¨ ohme, Z. A. Mold- abekov, and P. Tolias, Green’s function perspective on the nonlinear density response of quantum many- body systems: J. vorberger et al., Journal of Statistical Physics192, 75 (2025)

    2025

  73. [73]

    Kubo, The fluctuation-dissipation theorem, Reports on progress in physics29, 255 (1966)

    R. Kubo, The fluctuation-dissipation theorem, Reports on progress in physics29, 255 (1966)

    1966

  74. [74]

    Hansen and I

    J.-P. Hansen and I. R. McDonald,Theory of Simple Liq- uids, 2nd ed. (Academic Press, London, 1986)

    1986

  75. [75]

    Pines and P

    D. Pines and P. Nozi` eres,Theory of Quantum Liquids: Normal Fermi liquids(CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2018)

    2018

  76. [76]

    Groth, T

    S. Groth, T. Dornheim, and J. Vorberger,Ab initio path integral Monte Carlo approach to the static and dynamic density response of the uniform electron gas, Physical Review B99, 235122 (2019)

    2019

  77. [77]

    Z. A. Moldabekov, C. Ma, X. Shao, S. Schwalbe, P. Svensson, P. Tolias, J. Vorberger, and T. Dornheim, Generalized density functional theory framework for the nonlinear density response of quantum many-body sys- tems, Physical Review B113, 125115 (2026)

    2026

  78. [78]

    Dornheim, Z

    T. Dornheim, Z. A. Moldabekov, and J. Vorberger, Non- linear density response from imaginary-time correlation functions: Ab initio path integral Monte Carlo simula- tions of the warm dense electron gas, The Journal of Chemical Physics155(2021)

    2021

  79. [79]

    D. M. Ceperley, Fermion nodes, Journal of Statistical Physics63, 1237 (1991)

    1991

  80. [80]

    Giuliani and G

    G. Giuliani and G. Vignale,Quantum Theory of the Electron Liquid(Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge, UK, 2008)

    2008

Showing first 80 references.