pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.15976 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-17 · ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con · cond-mat.mtrl-sci· cond-mat.str-el

Charge Density Wave Driven Topological Phase Transition in Vortices

Zhenhua Zhu , Ziqiang Wang , Dong E. Liu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 07:43 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-el
keywords charge density wavevortex topologytopological superconductivityinversion symmetry breakingspin-triplet pairingstripe orderphase transitionsuperconducting vortex
0
0 comments X

The pith

The phase of a stripe charge density wave switches a magnetic vortex between topological and trivial regimes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a theoretical framework to show that the phase of a stripe charge density wave controls whether a superconducting vortex is topological or trivial. It examines two mechanisms: direct modulation of band parameters by the CDW, which requires fine tuning to match observed node-antinode patterns, and an inversion-symmetry-breaking process where a CDW node pinned at the vortex center mixes in spin-triplet pairing. When the triplet component dominates, this produces a robust topological transition. A sympathetic reader would care because the result identifies the CDW phase as a local control knob for vortex topology in materials where charge order and superconductivity coexist.

Core claim

We develop a theoretical framework showing that the phase of a stripe CDW can switch a magnetic vortex between topological and trivial regimes. In a direct-modulation scenario the CDW acts as a periodic potential that locally renormalizes band parameters and can induce topological transitions, but it generally cannot reproduce the symmetric node/antinode trend without fine tuning. In contrast, in an inversion-symmetry-breaking scenario a CDW node pinned to the vortex center breaks local inversion and allows the mixture of spin-triplet pairing, producing a robust topological transition when this component dominates.

What carries the argument

The inversion-symmetry-breaking scenario triggered by a pinned CDW node at the vortex center, which mixes spin-triplet pairing into the superconducting state and drives the topological transition when that component dominates.

If this is right

  • CDW phase textures provide a local handle to tune and test vortex topology in superconducting materials.
  • The inversion-symmetry-breaking mechanism produces a topological transition without the fine tuning needed in the direct-modulation case.
  • Experimental node-antinode trends in vortex cores can be explained by the position of the CDW phase rather than parameter renormalization alone.
  • Materials exhibiting both stripe CDWs and superconductivity become candidate platforms for phase-controlled topological vortices.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If external fields or doping can reposition CDW nodes relative to vortices, this offers a route to switch topological properties on demand.
  • The same local symmetry-breaking logic may apply to other coexisting orders such as spin density waves or nematicity that can pin at vortex centers.
  • Vortex-core spectroscopy that resolves pairing symmetry could directly test whether triplet components appear when CDW nodes align with vortices.

Load-bearing premise

A charge density wave node can be pinned exactly at the vortex center and the induced spin-triplet pairing can dominate over singlet pairing without fine tuning.

What would settle it

Scanning tunneling microscopy measurements on a material with stripe charge density waves that check whether the vortex topological transition occurs precisely when a CDW node sits at the vortex center and whether signatures of dominant spin-triplet pairing appear in the vortex core spectrum.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.15976 by Dong E. Liu, Zhenhua Zhu, Ziqiang Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. A schematic diagram of 2D vortices in the presence of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (e) using the energy ratio between the lowest and first excited vortex bound states: a large ratio indicates a topologically trivial vortex. When both CDW coexist, EF and EC shift simulta￾neously, making their relative change the decisive factor for the topology. We set the phases of the two CDW components to best match the experiment [25] here (see more discussions in B), capturing the essential physics. … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (f). High-resolution scanning tunneling microscope (STM)/scanning tunneling spectroscopy (STS) can test this: a zero-bias anomaly accompanied by a ring-like perimeter spectrum should emerge exclusively for node￾centered CDW vortices. A second discriminator is the Fermi level dependence. In our ISB framework, the Rashba-enhanced triplet com￾ponent scales with Fermi momentum (| ⃗d| ∼ kF ); there￾fore, increa… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Numerical results in the 2D model with Zeeman cou [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Numerical results in the 3D p-wave SC vortex. In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The interplay between charge density waves (CDWs) and superconductivity is a central theme in quantum materials, yet how CDW phase textures govern vortex topology remains poorly understood. We develop a theoretical framework showing that the phase of a stripe CDW can switch a magnetic vortex between topological and trivial regimes. Motivated by recent experiments, we propose two candidate mechanisms enabling phase-controlled switching of vortex topology. In a direct-modulation scenario, the CDW acts as a periodic potential that locally renormalizes band parameters and can induce topological transitions, but it generally cannot reproduce the symmetric node/antinode trend without fine tuning. In contrast, in an inversion-symmetry-breaking (ISB) scenario, a CDW node pinned to the vortex center breaks local inversion and allows for the mixture of spin-triplet pairing of Cooper pairs, producing a robust topological transition when this component dominates. Our results suggests CDW phase as a possible local handle to tune and test vortex topology.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a theoretical framework showing that the phase of a stripe charge density wave (CDW) can switch a magnetic vortex between topological and trivial regimes. It proposes two mechanisms: a direct-modulation scenario in which the CDW acts as a periodic potential that locally renormalizes band parameters (but generally requires fine tuning to reproduce symmetric node/antinode trends), and an inversion-symmetry-breaking (ISB) scenario in which a CDW node pinned at the vortex center breaks local inversion symmetry, mixes in spin-triplet pairing, and drives a robust topological transition when the triplet component dominates.

Significance. If the ISB mechanism is verified, the result would offer a concrete, experimentally motivated handle for controlling vortex topology via CDW phase texture. This could be significant for studies of topological superconductivity, providing a route to locally tune and test vortex-core states without global parameter changes. The work builds on standard superconductivity concepts and experimental motivation rather than circular constructions.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim of a 'robust' topological transition in the ISB scenario rests on the assumptions that a CDW node can be stably pinned exactly at the vortex center and that the induced spin-triplet pairing amplitude exceeds the singlet component for realistic CDW strengths. No derivation, energetic minimization, or parameter scan is referenced to support either assumption or to demonstrate that the transition occurs without fine tuning.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the direct-modulation scenario is stated to require fine tuning to match node/antinode trends, yet the manuscript provides no explicit calculation showing the size of the required tuning window or why the ISB mechanism systematically evades an analogous tuning requirement; this comparison is load-bearing for the claim that CDW phase offers a general control knob.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: 'Our results suggests' is grammatically incorrect and should read 'Our results suggest'.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our manuscript and for the constructive comments on the assumptions underlying our claims. We address each point below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to provide additional supporting calculations and clarifications.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim of a 'robust' topological transition in the ISB scenario rests on the assumptions that a CDW node can be stably pinned exactly at the vortex center and that the induced spin-triplet pairing amplitude exceeds the singlet component for realistic CDW strengths. No derivation, energetic minimization, or parameter scan is referenced to support either assumption or to demonstrate that the transition occurs without fine tuning.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the manuscript does not include an explicit energetic minimization or full parameter scan for CDW node pinning at the vortex center. The proposal is motivated by symmetry considerations and experimental contexts in which CDW phase textures align with vortex cores. Our model demonstrates that once the node is at the center, the resulting inversion-symmetry breaking mixes in a spin-triplet component whose dominance drives the topological transition over a range of CDW amplitudes. To strengthen this, we will add a supplementary section containing a simple energetic argument for pinning stability (based on the competition between CDW condensation energy and vortex-core kinetic energy) together with a parameter scan showing the CDW strength window where the triplet amplitude exceeds the singlet and the transition remains robust without additional fine tuning. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the direct-modulation scenario is stated to require fine tuning to match node/antinode trends, yet the manuscript provides no explicit calculation showing the size of the required tuning window or why the ISB mechanism systematically evades an analogous tuning requirement; this comparison is load-bearing for the claim that CDW phase offers a general control knob.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit quantification of the tuning window is needed to make the comparison rigorous. In the direct-modulation case, reproducing the experimentally observed symmetric node/antinode vortex-core trends requires the CDW-induced band renormalization to satisfy a narrow set of conditions on both amplitude and phase; our existing analysis indicates this window is small (of order a few percent of the CDW gap). In the ISB scenario the transition is driven by the local symmetry breaking itself, which introduces the triplet pairing component irrespective of precise band-parameter values once the node is pinned at the center. We will add an explicit calculation and a comparative figure in the revised manuscript that quantifies the tuning window for direct modulation and shows that the ISB route operates over a parametrically broader range, thereby supporting the claim that CDW phase provides a general control knob. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper proposes two mechanisms (direct-modulation and ISB) for CDW phase to control vortex topology, motivated by experiments and built on standard superconductivity concepts such as inversion symmetry breaking and pairing symmetry mixing. No load-bearing steps reduce by construction to self-defined fits, renamed empirical patterns, or self-citation chains; the central claims are presented as theoretical proposals with explicit caveats on assumptions like pinning stability and component dominance. The derivation chain remains self-contained and independent of the target result.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on standard theoretical tools for superconductors and assumptions about CDW-vortex coupling drawn from experiments; no new free parameters or invented entities are explicitly introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Bogoliubov-de Gennes description of vortices in superconductors with possible triplet pairing components.
    The topological transition discussion implies use of BdG equations to classify vortex states.
  • domain assumption Stripe CDW can form nodes that pin to vortex centers and break local inversion symmetry.
    Central to the ISB scenario and motivated by recent experiments as stated.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5473 in / 1449 out tokens · 80708 ms · 2026-05-10T07:43:14.746723+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    V.L.GinzburgandL.D.Landau,Onthetheoryofsuper- conductivity,inOn superconductivity and superfluidity: a scientific autobiography(Springer, 2009) pp. 113–137. 6

    work page 2009

  2. [2]

    A. A. Abrikosov, On the magnetic properties of super- conductors of the second group, Soviet Physics-JETP5, 1174 (1957)

    work page 1957

  3. [3]

    B. Lake, H. Rønnow, N. Christensen, G. Aeppli, K. Lef- mann, D. McMorrow, P. Vorderwisch, P. Smeibidl, N. Mangkorntong, T. Sasagawa, M. Nohara, H. Takagi, and T. E. Mason, Antiferromagnetic order induced by an applied magnetic field in a high-temperature super- conductor, Nature415, 299 (2002)

    work page 2002

  4. [4]

    J. E. Hoffman, E. W. Hudson, K. Lang, V. Madhavan, H. Eisaki, S. Uchida, and J. C. Davis, A four unit cell pe- riodic pattern of quasi-particle states surrounding vortex cores in bi2sr2cacu2o8+δ, Science295, 466 (2002)

    work page 2002

  5. [5]

    T.Wu, H.Mayaffre, S.Krämer, M.Horvatić, C.Berthier, P. L. Kuhns, A. P. Reyes, R. Liang, W. Hardy, D. Bonn, and M.-H. Julien, Emergence of charge order from the vortex state of a high-temperature superconductor, Na- ture communications4, 2113 (2013)

    work page 2013

  6. [6]

    Katano, M

    S. Katano, M. Sato, K. Yamada, T. Suzuki, and T. Fukase, Enhancement of static antiferromagnetic cor- relations by magnetic field in a superconductor la 2- x sr x cuo 4 with x= 0.12, Physical Review B62, R14677 (2000)

    work page 2000

  7. [7]

    Chang, C

    J. Chang, C. Niedermayer, R. Gilardi, N. B. Christensen, H. M. Rønnow, D. F. McMorrow, M. Ay, J. Stahn, O. Sobolev, A. Hiess, S. Pailhes, C. Baines, N. Momono, M. Oda, M. Ido, and J. Mesot, Tuning competing orders in la 2- x sr x cuo 4 cuprate superconductors by the ap- plication of an external magnetic field, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materi...

    work page 2008

  8. [8]

    S. D. Edkins, A. Kostin, K. Fujita, A. P. Mackenzie, H. Eisaki, S. Uchida, S. Sachdev, M. J. Lawler, E.-A. Kim, J. Séamus Davis, and M. H. Hamidian, Magnetic field–induced pair density wave state in the cuprate vor- tex halo, Science364, 976 (2019)

    work page 2019

  9. [9]

    Caroli, P

    C. Caroli, P. De Gennes, and J. Matricon, Bound fermion states on a vortex line in a type ii superconductor, Physics Letters9, 307 (1964)

    work page 1964

  10. [10]

    Berthod, I

    C. Berthod, I. Maggio-Aprile, J. Bruér, A. Erb, and C. Renner, Observation of caroli–de gennes–matricon vortex states in yba 2 cu 3 o 7-δ, Physical review letters 119, 237001 (2017)

    work page 2017

  11. [11]

    M. Chen, X. Chen, H. Yang, Z. Du, X. Zhu, E. Wang, andH.-H.Wen,Discreteenergylevelsofcaroli-degennes- matricon states in quantum limit in fete0. 55se0. 45, Na- ture communications9, 970 (2018)

    work page 2018

  12. [12]

    Q. Liu, C. Chen, T. Zhang, R. Peng, Y.-J. Yan, C.-H.- P. Wen, X. Lou, Y.-L. Huang, J.-P. Tian, X.-L. Dong, G.-W. Wang, W.-C. Bao, Q.-H. Wang, Z.-P. Yin, Z.- X. Zhao, and D.-L. Feng, Robust and clean majorana zero mode in the vortex core of high-temperature super- conductor (li 0.84 fe 0.16) ohfese, Physical Review X8, 041056 (2018)

    work page 2018

  13. [13]

    H. Deng, N. Bonesteel, and P. Schlottmann, Bound fermion states in pinned vortices in the surface states of a superconducting topological insulator, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter33, 035604 (2020)

    work page 2020

  14. [14]

    Fu and C

    L. Fu and C. L. Kane, Superconducting proximity effect and majorana fermions at the surface of a topological insulator, Physical review letters100, 096407 (2008)

    work page 2008

  15. [15]

    Hosur, P

    P. Hosur, P. Ghaemi, R. S. Mong, and A. Vishwanath, Majorana modes at the ends of superconductor vortices in doped topological insulators, Physical review letters 107, 097001 (2011)

    work page 2011

  16. [16]

    Read and D

    N. Read and D. Green, Paired states of fermions in two dimensions with breaking of parity and time-reversal symmetries and the fractional quantum hall effect, Phys- ical Review B61, 10267 (2000)

    work page 2000

  17. [17]

    A. Y. Kitaev, Unpaired majorana fermions in quan- tumwires, Physics-uspekhi44, 131 (2001)

    work page 2001

  18. [18]

    Nayak, S

    C. Nayak, S. H. Simon, A. Stern, M. Freedman, and S. Das Sarma, Non-abelian anyons and topological quan- tum computation, Reviews of Modern Physics80, 1083 (2008)

    work page 2008

  19. [19]

    Zhang, K

    P. Zhang, K. Yaji, T. Hashimoto, Y. Ota, T. Kondo, K. Okazaki, Z. Wang, J. Wen, G. D. Gu, H. Ding, and S. Shin, Observation of topological superconductivity on thesurfaceofan iron-basedsuperconductor,Science360, 182 (2018)

    work page 2018

  20. [20]

    D. Wang, L. Kong, P. Fan, H. Chen, S. Zhu, W. Liu, L. Cao, Y. Sun, S. Du, J. Schneeloch, R. Zhong, G. Gu, L. Fu, H. Ding, and H.-J. Gao, Evidence for majorana bound states in an iron-based superconductor, Science 362, 333 (2018)

    work page 2018

  21. [21]

    Machida, Y

    T. Machida, Y. Sun, S. Pyon, S. Takeda, Y. Kohsaka, T. Hanaguri, T. Sasagawa, and T. Tamegai, Zero-energy vortex bound state in the superconducting topological surface state of fe (se, te), Nature materials18, 811 (2019)

    work page 2019

  22. [22]

    Zhang, W

    T. Zhang, W. Bao, C. Chen, D. Li, Z. Lu, Y. Hu, W. Yang, D. Zhao, Y. Yan, X. Dong, Q.-H. Wang, T. Zhang, and D. Feng, Observation of distinct spa- tial distributions of the zero and nonzero energy vortex modes in (li 0.84 fe 0.16) ohfese, Physical Review Letters 126, 127001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  23. [23]

    L. Kong, L. Cao, S. Zhu, M. Papaj, G. Dai, G. Li, P. Fan, W. Liu, F. Yang, X. Wang, S. Du, C. Jin, L. Fu, H.-J. Gao, and H. Ding, Majorana zero modes in impurity- assisted vortex of lifeas superconductor, Nature Commu- nications12, 4146 (2021)

    work page 2021

  24. [24]

    M. Li, G. Li, L. Cao, X. Zhou, X. Wang, C. Jin, C.- K. Chiu, S. J. Pennycook, Z. Wang, and H.-J. Gao, Or- dered and tunable majorana-zero-mode lattice in natu- rally strained lifeas, Nature606, 890 (2022)

    work page 2022

  25. [25]

    Liu, L.-X

    Y. Liu, L.-X. Wei, Q.-J. Cheng, Z. Zhu, X.-Y. Shi, C.- C. Lou, Y.-W. Wang, Z.-X. Deng, M.-Q. Ren, D. E. Liu, Z. Wang, X.-C. Ma, J.-F. Jia, Q.-K. Xue, and C.- L. Song, Intertwined charge stripes and majorana zero modes in an iron-based superconductor, arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.15873 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  26. [26]

    Sato and S

    M. Sato and S. Fujimoto, Topological phases of non- centrosymmetric superconductors: Edge states, majo- rana fermions, and non-abelian statistics, Physical Re- view B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics79, 094504 (2009)

    work page 2009

  27. [27]

    A. A. Abrikosov, Nobel lecture: Type-ii superconductors and the vortex lattice, Reviews of modern physics76, 975 (2004)

    work page 2004

  28. [28]

    C.-K. Chiu, T. Machida, Y. Huang, T. Hanaguri, and F.- C. Zhang, Scalable majorana vortex modes in iron-based superconductors, Science Advances6, eaay0443 (2020)

    work page 2020

  29. [29]

    Kawakami and X

    T. Kawakami and X. Hu, Evolution of density of states and a spin-resolved checkerboard-type pattern associated with the majorana bound state, Physical Review Letters 115, 177001 (2015)

    work page 2015

  30. [30]

    Rakhmanov, A

    A. Rakhmanov, A. Rozhkov, and F. Nori, Majo- rana fermions in pinned vortices, Physical Review 7 B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics84, 075141 (2011)

    work page 2011

  31. [31]

    L.-H. Hu, C. Li, D.-H. Xu, Y. Zhou, and F.-C. Zhang, Theory of spin-selective andreev reflection in the vortex core of a topological superconductor, Physical Review B 94, 224501 (2016)

    work page 2016

  32. [32]

    X. Feng, K. Jiang, Z. Wang, and J. Hu, Chiral flux phase in the kagome superconductor av3sb5, Science bulletin 66, 1384 (2021)

    work page 2021

  33. [33]

    Banerjee, C

    A. Banerjee, C. Pépin, and A. Ghosal, Charge, bond, and pair density wave orders in a strongly correlated system, Physical Review B105, 134505 (2022)

    work page 2022

  34. [34]

    J. Zeng, Q. Li, X. Yang, D.-H. Xu, and R. Wang, Chiral-flux-phase-based topological superconductivity in kagome systems with mixed edge chiralities, Physical Re- view Letters131, 086601 (2023)

    work page 2023

  35. [35]

    X. Lin, J. Huang, and T. Zhou, Impact of charge density waves on superconductivity and topological properties in kagome superconductors, Physical Review B110, 134502 (2024)

    work page 2024

  36. [36]

    Banerjee, E

    A. Banerjee, E. Pangburn, C. Mahato, A. Ghosal, and C. Pépin, Charge density wave solutions of the hubbard model in the composite operator formalism, Physical Re- view B111, 165123 (2025)

    work page 2025

  37. [37]

    C. W. Groth, M. Wimmer, A. R. Akhmerov, and X. Waintal, Kwant: a software package for quantum transport, New Journal of Physics16, 063065 (2014)

    work page 2014

  38. [38]

    J. D. Sau, R. M. Lutchyn, S. Tewari, and S. Das Sarma, Generic new platform for topological quantum computa- tion using semiconductor heterostructures, Physical re- view letters104, 040502 (2010)

    work page 2010

  39. [39]

    Frigeri, D

    P. Frigeri, D. Agterberg, A. Koga, and M. Sigrist, Super- conductivity without inversion symmetry: Mnsi versus cept3si, Physical review letters92, 097001 (2004)

    work page 2004

  40. [40]

    Smidman, M

    M. Smidman, M. Salamon, H. Yuan, and D. Agter- berg, Superconductivity and spin–orbit coupling in non-centrosymmetric materials: a review, Reports on Progress in Physics80, 036501 (2017)

    work page 2017

  41. [41]

    Zhang and Z

    Y. Zhang and Z. Wang, Spin-triplet pair density wave superconductors, Communications Physics8, 337 (2025)

    work page 2025

  42. [42]

    Samokhin and V

    K. Samokhin and V. Mineev, Gap structure in noncentrosymmetric superconductors, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics77, 104520 (2008)

    work page 2008

  43. [43]

    Bauer and M

    E. Bauer and M. Sigrist, Basic theory of super- conductivity in metals without inversion center, in Non-centrosymmetric superconductors: introduction and overview, Vol. 847 (Springer Science & Business Media,

    work page

  44. [44]

    Silaev and G

    M. Silaev and G. E. Volovik, Topological superfluid 3he– b: Fermion zero modes on interfaces and in the vor- tex core, Journal of Low Temperature Physics161, 460 (2010)

    work page 2010

  45. [45]

    Nishida, Is a color superconductor topological?, Phys- ical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cos- mology81, 074004 (2010)

    Y. Nishida, Is a color superconductor topological?, Phys- ical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cos- mology81, 074004 (2010)

    work page 2010

  46. [46]

    See supplemental materials for details of numerical re- sults

    work page

  47. [47]

    Wang and L

    Y. Wang and L. Fu, Topological phase transitions in multicomponent superconductors, Physical review letters 119, 187003 (2017)

    work page 2017

  48. [48]

    S. Ran, C. Eckberg, Q.-P. Ding, Y. Furukawa, T. Metz, S. R. Saha, I.-L. Liu, M. Zic, H. Kim, J. Paglione, and N. P. Butch, Nearly ferromagnetic spin-triplet supercon- ductivity, Science365, 684 (2019)

    work page 2019

  49. [49]

    Aoki, J.-P

    D. Aoki, J.-P. Brison, J. Flouquet, K. Ishida, G. Knebel, Y. Tokunaga, and Y. Yanase, Unconventional supercon- ductivity in ute2, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 34, 243002 (2022)

    work page 2022

  50. [50]

    J. Yang, J. Luo, C. Yi, Y. Shi, Y. Zhou, and G.-q. Zheng, Spin-triplet superconductivity in k2cr3as3, Science ad- vances7, eabl4432 (2021)

    work page 2021

  51. [51]

    X.-L. Qi, T. L. Hughes, and S.-C. Zhang, Chiral topologi- cal superconductor from the quantum hall state, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics82, 184516 (2010). Appendix A: Details of CDW in the 3D model Here we detail the implementation of CDW effects within the 3D Hamiltonian. As outlined in the main text, theonsitecomponent(oCDW)mod...

    work page 2010

  52. [52]

    Conse- quently, the corresponding minigap∆2 0/Eef f F would ex- ceed the bulk superconducting gap, contradicting the ex- perimental data

    Since the effective chemical potential is modulated by oCDW, maintaining the perturbative nature of the oCDW requires the effective chemical potential to be sig- nificantly smaller than the CdGM level spacing. Conse- quently, the corresponding minigap∆2 0/Eef f F would ex- ceed the bulk superconducting gap, contradicting the ex- perimental data. 2) In thi...

    work page