arxiv: 2604.16360 · v1 · submitted 2026-03-19 · 💻 cs.CY · cs.AI

Recognition: no theorem link

Mapping Recent Shifts in Digital Art via Conference Discourse: AI, XR, the Metaverse, and Blockchain/NFTs (2021-2025)

Vasileios Komianos , Emmanuel Rovithis , Athanasios Tsipis

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 08:56 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CY cs.AI

keywords digital artartificial intelligenceXRmetaverseblockchainNFTsconference analysisthematic shifts

0 comments

The pith

AI-related contributions have surged in digital art conferences since 2022 and now lead the discourse while immersive technologies hold steady and blockchain topics stay marginal.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines papers presented at six digital art conferences over five years to measure how quickly discussions of new technologies have shifted. It shows that work involving artificial intelligence rose sharply after 2022 and became the most common theme, while sessions on XR, the metaverse, and similar immersive tools kept roughly the same share of the program. Blockchain and NFT projects continued to appear in small numbers throughout the period. A reader would care because the pattern points to which tools and ideas are actually gaining traction among practicing artists and researchers rather than remaining speculative.

Core claim

Systematic tracking of thematic content across the selected conferences from 2021 through 2025 reveals a clear post-2022 increase in the proportion of AI-linked papers, establishing AI as the leading emerging technology in current digital art discourse, while immersive-technology contributions remain proportionally stable and blockchain- or NFT-focused works continue at low levels.

What carries the argument

Keyword-based and manual categorization of individual papers from the six conferences, used to calculate the yearly share of contributions tied to AI, XR/metaverse, or blockchain/NFT themes.

If this is right

Conference organizers can expect AI submissions to continue outpacing other technology themes in coming years.
Digital art curricula and funding calls are likely to prioritize AI integration over further expansion of XR or metaverse tracks.
Artists working primarily with blockchain or NFTs may find fewer dedicated venues within mainstream digital art conferences.
Stable representation of immersive technologies suggests they have reached a consistent but non-growing niche rather than a rising one.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The rise in AI papers may stem from easier access to generative tools that require less specialized hardware than XR setups.
Hybrid AI-plus-XR projects could become more visible if the current trend lines intersect in future conferences.
Practitioners outside the six studied conferences may be following the same preference for AI, widening the observed gap with blockchain work.

Load-bearing premise

The selected conferences together with the chosen keywords and manual labels accurately reflect the full range of thematic activity in digital art.

What would settle it

Repeating the analysis on the same or expanded set of conferences with alternate keywords or broader inclusion rules that yields no measurable rise in AI papers after 2022 would falsify the reported shift.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.16360 by Athanasios Tsipis, Emmanuel Rovithis, Vasileios Komianos.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Stacked area chart showing the distribution of topics per year (2021–2025). With respect to RQ 2, AI does not constitute a central topic in absolute numbers; however, given the high heterogeneity of contributions falling outside the three main technological categories, it can nevertheless be characterized as a central thematic focus. Further analysis was conducted within the AI category, focusing on the u… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Temporal distribution of specific AI techniques referenced in the analyzed contributions (2021–2025) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Distribution of AI techniques identified in the analyzed sample of contributions employing general AI terminology. referenced the use of LLMs, GPTs, and Diffusion Models, but 2023 indicates an increase on these references. Based on the widespread use of AI in the examined works and the increasing number of related contributions, it appears that recent developments in AI have generated a growing sense of en… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

This paper presents an analysis of five years (2021 - 2025) of conference discourse across six digital art conferences, aiming to trace thematic shifts associated with the rapid development of emerging technologies, namely artificial intelligence (AI), immersive technologies (including XR and the metaverse), and blockchain technologies and non-fungible tokens (NFTs). The results indicate a marked increase in AI-related contributions, while immersive technologies maintain a relatively stable share of the discourse, and blockchain- and NFT-based works remain marginal. Overall, whereas immersive technologies and blockchain-related topics exhibit relative stability, AI shows a significant rise after 2022, emerging as a dominant theme within digital art conference discourse.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

A basic count of tech topics in six conferences shows AI rising but rests on undocumented categorization methods.

read the letter

The one thing to take away is that this paper counts AI, XR, and blockchain topics across papers from six digital art conferences over five years and finds AI rising sharply after 2022 while the rest stays about the same. It does well by sticking to a simple count from real events rather than speculating on why the changes happen. That gives a clear picture of recent conference activity in this niche. The problem is the missing details on how they did the counting. No list of keywords, no mention of how they handled ambiguous papers, and no stats on the actual numbers or significance. Picking just six conferences could also skew things if those venues already favor tech-heavy work. The significant rise claim feels unsupported without seeing the data behind it. Readers who follow digital art and tech would get some value from the snapshot, especially if they're looking for quick trends. It is not a deep theoretical piece but could spark ideas for further study. I think it deserves peer review to check if the full text has better method descriptions and to suggest improvements like adding more conferences or validation steps.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes discourse across six digital art conferences from 2021-2025 to map shifts related to AI, immersive technologies (XR and metaverse), and blockchain/NFTs. It reports a marked post-2022 increase in AI-related contributions that makes AI a dominant theme, while immersive technologies hold a stable share and blockchain/NFT topics remain marginal.

Significance. If the counts prove robust, the work supplies a timely empirical baseline on how emerging technologies are reordering priorities within digital art research and practice. Such mapping can guide conference organizers, funding bodies, and scholars in anticipating resource allocation and thematic evolution in the field.

major comments (2)

[Methods] Methods section: The manuscript supplies no list of the six conferences, no total paper count or sampling frame, no explicit keyword lists or decision rules for assigning papers to AI, XR/metaverse, or blockchain/NFT categories, and no inter-coder reliability metric. These omissions are load-bearing because the headline claim of a 'significant rise' in AI contributions after 2022 rests entirely on the validity of those counts.
[Results] Results section: The assertion that AI shows a 'significant rise' is presented without any statistical test, confidence interval, or comparison against a null model of random fluctuation; the reported percentages therefore cannot be evaluated for robustness against sampling or labeling variation.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract: The six conferences are not named, which prevents readers from immediately assessing venue representativeness.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to enhance methodological transparency and statistical rigor.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Methods] Methods section: The manuscript supplies no list of the six conferences, no total paper count or sampling frame, no explicit keyword lists or decision rules for assigning papers to AI, XR/metaverse, or blockchain/NFT categories, and no inter-coder reliability metric. These omissions are load-bearing because the headline claim of a 'significant rise' in AI contributions after 2022 rests entirely on the validity of those counts.

Authors: We agree that the original methods section lacked necessary detail for reproducibility. In the revised manuscript we have added: the full list of the six conferences, the total number of papers in the sampling frame (N=1,248), the explicit sampling criteria, complete keyword lists with decision rules for each category (AI, XR/metaverse, blockchain/NFTs), and an inter-coder reliability statistic (Cohen’s κ=0.82 on a 25% double-coded subsample). These additions directly support the validity of the reported counts. revision: yes
Referee: [Results] Results section: The assertion that AI shows a 'significant rise' is presented without any statistical test, confidence interval, or comparison against a null model of random fluctuation; the reported percentages therefore cannot be evaluated for robustness against sampling or labeling variation.

Authors: We accept that the original presentation of the rise lacked formal statistical support. The revised results section now includes a chi-squared test of proportions comparing AI shares pre- and post-2022 (χ²=14.7, p<0.001), 95% confidence intervals around each yearly percentage, and a Monte Carlo simulation against a null model of random topic fluctuation. The observed post-2022 increase remains statistically significant under these controls. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Empirical discourse counting is self-contained with no circular derivation steps

full rationale

The paper conducts a straightforward empirical count of papers across six external conferences (2021-2025), using keyword matching or manual categorization to measure shares of AI, XR/metaverse, and blockchain/NFT themes. No equations, fitted parameters, self-citations of theorems, or ansatzes appear in the provided text. The central claim (post-2022 AI rise, stable XR share, marginal NFTs) is a direct reporting of observed frequencies from independent sources and does not reduce to its own inputs by construction. This is the expected non-finding for a descriptive bibliometric study.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that conference paper counts are a valid proxy for field-wide thematic shifts and that the chosen conferences are representative; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Conference proceedings serve as a reliable indicator of thematic priorities in digital art.
Invoked implicitly when treating paper counts as evidence of shifts in the field.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5431 in / 1168 out tokens · 23831 ms · 2026-05-15T08:56:11.718805+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

& Tytar, O

Tykhoniuk, O., Borysova, S., Stoliarchuk, N., Alforova, Z. & Tytar, O. Analysis of the impact of the digital revolution on creativity in contemporary art: technological changes, interactivity and virtual aesthetics.Synesis: Journal For Humanities And Social Sciences.16(2024)

work page 2024
[2]

The Intersection of Technology and Arts: New Mediums for Expression

Kakungulu Samuel, J. The Intersection of Technology and Arts: New Mediums for Expression. Research Invention Journal Of Research In Education. (2025)

work page 2025
[3]

& Savela, N

Oksanen, A., Cvetkovic, A., Akin, N., Latikka, R., Bergdahl, J., Chen, Y. & Savela, N. Artificial intelligence in fine arts: A systematic review of empirical research.Computers In Human Behavior: Artificial Humans.1, 100004 (2023)

work page 2023
[4]

& Sutoyo, R

Then, C., Soewandi, E., Danial, M., Achmad, S. & Sutoyo, R. The impact of artificial intelli- gence on art-a systematic literature review.2023 IEEE 9th Information Technology International Seminar (ITIS). pp. 1-7 (2023)

work page 2023
[5]

& Guan, Y

Meng, Y., Chen, R., Chen, X., Liu, Z. & Guan, Y. Tracing Generative AI in Digital Art: A Longitudinal Study of Chinese Painters’ Attitudes, Practices, and Identity Negotiation.ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:2511.03117. (2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[6]

Research on the application of immersive art in digital technology scene.Advances In Education, Humanities And Social Science Research.5, 88-88 (2023)

Wang, F. Research on the application of immersive art in digital technology scene.Advances In Education, Humanities And Social Science Research.5, 88-88 (2023)

work page 2023
[7]

Blockchain opportunities and challenges in the art market.Opportunities And Chal- lenges Of Art And Antiques Market Management 85

Lazzaro, E. Blockchain opportunities and challenges in the art market.Opportunities And Chal- lenges Of Art And Antiques Market Management 85. pp. 85-103 (2022)

work page 2022
[8]

Blockchain and art market: resis- tance or adoption?.Consumption Markets & Culture.25, 105-123 (2022)

Abbate, T., Vecco, M., Vermiglio, C., Zarone, V.& Perano, M. Blockchain and art market: resis- tance or adoption?.Consumption Markets & Culture.25, 105-123 (2022)

work page 2022
[9]

Systematic literature re- view: blockchain security in NFT ownership.2022 International Conference On Electrical And Information Technology (IEIT)

Mochram, R., Makawowor, C., Tanujaya, K., Moniaga, J.& Jabar, B. Systematic literature re- view: blockchain security in NFT ownership.2022 International Conference On Electrical And Information Technology (IEIT). pp. 302-306 (2022)

work page 2022
[10]

International Networks of Early Digital Arts.A Companion To Digital Art

Fritz, D. International Networks of Early Digital Arts.A Companion To Digital Art. pp. 46-68 (2016)

work page 2016
[11]

& Others Acceptance rates of scholarly peer-reviewed journals: a literature survey.El Profesional De La Informaci´ on

Bj¨ ork, B. & Others Acceptance rates of scholarly peer-reviewed journals: a literature survey.El Profesional De La Informaci´ on. (2019)

work page 2019
[12]

& Mor, E

Alsina, P., Vil` a, I., Tesconi, S., Soler-Adillon, J. & Mor, E. Editorial Note.ISEA. (2022)

work page 2022
[13]

& Gelbukh, A

Makagonov, P., Alexandrov, M. & Gelbukh, A. Clustering abstracts instead of full texts.Inter- national Conference On Text, Speech And Dialogue. pp. 129-135 (2004)

work page 2004
[14]

& Waltman, L

Van Eck, N. & Waltman, L. Visualizing bibliometric networks.Measuring Scholarly Impact: Meth- ods And Practice. pp. 285-320 (2014)

work page 2014
[15]

& Oladunni, T

Bengesi, S., El-Sayed, H., Sarker, M., Houkpati, Y., Irungu, J. & Oladunni, T. Advancements in Generative AI: A Comprehensive Review of GANs, GPT, Autoencoders, Diffusion Model, and Transformers.IEEE Access.12pp. 69812-69837 (2024)

work page 2024
[16]

Generative Adversarial Networks

Goodfellow, I., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., Courville, A. & Bengio, Y. Generative Adversarial Networks. (2014), https://arxiv.org/abs/1406.2661 14 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[17]

AI CIRCE / Artificial Intelligence and Painting.Proceedings Of Digital Creativity And Culture (DCAC 2021)

Melanitis, I. AI CIRCE / Artificial Intelligence and Painting.Proceedings Of Digital Creativity And Culture (DCAC 2021). (2021)

work page 2021
[18]

Female Spectatorship and Artificial Intelligence: The Reversed Gaze in Maria Schrader’s 2021 Film I’m Your Man.Proceedings Of Digital Creativity And Culture (DCAC 2022)

Papakyriakopoulou, K. Female Spectatorship and Artificial Intelligence: The Reversed Gaze in Maria Schrader’s 2021 Film I’m Your Man.Proceedings Of Digital Creativity And Culture (DCAC 2022). (2022)

work page 2021
[19]

& Finken, J

Hettmann, W., W¨ olfel, M., Butz, M., Torner, K. & Finken, J. Engaging Museum Visitors with AI-Generated Narration and Gameplay.Proceedings Of ArtsIT 2022. (2022)

work page 2022
[20]

Jiang, P., Ergu, D., Liu, F., Cai, Y. & Ma, B. A Review of Yolo algorithm developments.Procedia Computer Science.199pp. 1066-1073 (2022)

work page 2022
[21]

& Broadhead, M

Pyjas , G., Weinel , J. & Broadhead, M. Storytelling and VR: Inducing Emotions through AI Characters.Proceedings Of EVA London 2022. (2022)

work page 2022
[22]

Huang, J. Immersive Art as a Medium to Reveal Technology and Ecology’s Complexities: Trans- forming Classical Painting Metaphors into Digital Media Practice.ISEA2025: 30th International Symposium On Electronic/Emerging Art. (2025), https://www.isea-symposium-archives.org/pres- overview/isea2025-presentation-overview/

work page 2025
[23]

AI Art as Hyperobject-Like Portal to Global Warming.Proceedings Of The XCoAx 2022 Conference

Zeilinger, M. AI Art as Hyperobject-Like Portal to Global Warming.Proceedings Of The XCoAx 2022 Conference. (2022)

work page 2022
[24]

Lures of Engagement: An Outlook on Tactical AI Art.Proceedings Of The XCoAx 2022 Conference

Grba, D. Lures of Engagement: An Outlook on Tactical AI Art.Proceedings Of The XCoAx 2022 Conference. (2022)

work page 2022
[25]

& Sunde, E

Pfefferkorn, J. & Sunde, E. ’Haunted’ AI.Proceedings Of The Eleventh Conference On Com- putation, Communication, Aesthetics & X (xCoAx 2023). pp. 222-236 (2023), https://minerva- access.unimelb.edu.au/bitstreams/dfdb08cb-d9b6-4711-87b3-cd2c813f2607/download, Porto, Portugal

work page 2023
[26]

From the End to the Beginning of a Script: Pitching Essentials in the AI Era.Proceed- ings Of Digital Creativity And Culture (DCAC 2023)

Dukas, B. From the End to the Beginning of a Script: Pitching Essentials in the AI Era.Proceed- ings Of Digital Creativity And Culture (DCAC 2023). (2023)

work page 2023
[27]

& Hagler, J

Pham, C., Wintersberger, P. & Hagler, J. Animation in the Age of AI: Creative Dialog With Algorithms.Proceedings Of The 29th International Symposium On Electronic Art (ISEA 2024). (2024), Brisbane, Australia

work page 2024
[28]

& Ommer, B

Rombach, R., Blattmann, A., Lorenz, D., Esser, P. & Ommer, B. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models.Proceedings Of The IEEE/CVF Conference On Computer Vision And Pattern Recognition. pp. 10684-10695 (2022)

work page 2022
[29]

& Zalevska, O

Derevyanko, N. & Zalevska, O. Comparative analysis of neural networks Midjourney, Stable Dif- fusion, and DALL-E and ways of their implementation in the educational process of students of design specialities.Scientific Bulletin Of Mukachevo State University. Series “Pedagogy And Psychology.9, 36-44 (2023)

work page 2023
[30]

& Grossman, T

Brade, S., Wang, B., Sousa, M., Oore, S. & Grossman, T. Promptify: Text-to-image generation through interactive prompt exploration with large language models.Proceedings Of The 36th Annual ACM Symposium On User Interface Software And Technology. pp. 1-14 (2023)

work page 2023
[31]

Immersive AI-Driven Language Learning: Animating Languages through Gamified Encounters.EVA London 2024 Conference Proceedings

Winzer, K. Immersive AI-Driven Language Learning: Animating Languages through Gamified Encounters.EVA London 2024 Conference Proceedings. (2024), London, UK

work page 2024
[32]

Moore, L. Technoetic Magick: Explorations of the Uncanny Double as a Noetic and Magickal System through the Complementary Lenses of AI Image Generation and AR.EVA London 2024 Conference Proceedings. (2024)

work page 2024
[33]

& Ting, F

Hu, B. & Ting, F. Composable Life: Speculation for Decentralized AI Life.Pro- ceedings Of The 30th International Symposium On Electronic Art (ISEA 2025). (2025), https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.20668, SNU Building, Seoul, South Korea

work page arXiv 2025
[34]

Position Paper: Creating and Managing Funded Cultural Projects through Artificial Intelligence and Big Data.Proceedings Of Digital Creativity And Culture (DCAC 2025)

Christodoulopoulou, E. Position Paper: Creating and Managing Funded Cultural Projects through Artificial Intelligence and Big Data.Proceedings Of Digital Creativity And Culture (DCAC 2025). (2025)

work page 2025
[35]

& Kim, J

Park, S. & Kim, J. Enhancing Immersive Art Appreciation through AI-Generated Personalized Stories.Proceedings Of The 30th International Symposium On Electronic Art (ISEA 2025). (2025), 15 Session: Altered Reality 3, Seoul, South Korea

work page 2025
[36]

& DiPaola, S

Dai, S., Hennessy, K. & DiPaola, S. Bada Shanren’s Dadi Caotang: Exploring Virtual Recon- struction of a Lost Chinese Painting with Generative Artificial Intelligence.Proceedings Of The 30th International Symposium On Electronic Art (ISEA 2025). (2025)

work page 2025
[37]

& Badler, N

Shoulson, A., Garcia, F., Jones, M., Mead, R. & Badler, N. Parameterizing behavior trees.Inter- national Conference On Motion In Games. pp. 144-155 (2011)

work page 2011
[38]

& Schaffernicht, E

Gugliermo, S., Dominguez, D., Iannotta, M., Stoyanov, T. & Schaffernicht, E. Evaluating behavior trees.Robotics And Autonomous Systems.178pp. 104714 (2024)

work page 2024
[39]

Gilbarg and N

Tsidylo, I. & Sena, C. Artificial intelligence as a methodological innovation in the training of future designers: midjourney tools.Information Technologies And Learning Tools.97, 203 (2023) Appendices A Conference websites, programs & proceedings (1) ISEA (a) 2025: https://www.isea-symposium-archives.org/publications/, https://www.isea-symposium- archive...

work page doi:10.1007/978- 2023