Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 1 minor 104 references

The Qz5 Survey (II): Metallicity Evolution of Damped Ly{\alpha} Systems Out to z$\sim$5

T0 review · 2 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-05-10 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The metallicity of neutral hydrogen gas drops sharply at redshift around 5.

desk verdict The five new unbiased DLAs at z>4.7 are a useful addition, but the claimed sharp metallicity drop at z~5 rests on only five systems and weaker KS statistics than the 4.4 sigma figure suggests. read the letter →

arxiv 2604.16751 v1 submitted 2026-04-17 astro-ph.GA

Marie Wisz , Marc Rafelski , Grecco Oyarzun , Regina Jorgenson , Michele Fumagalli , Marcel Neeleman , Xavier Prochaska , Lise Christensen
show 5 more authors
Eldon Fobbs George Becker Joseph Hennawi Gabor Worseck Sebastian Lopez
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords dampedlymanalphasystemsmetallicityevolutionhighredshiftneutralhydrogenquasarabsorptionlinescosmicchemicalenrichment
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper adds five new damped Lyman-alpha systems at redshifts above 4.7 that were discovered without any selection based on their metal content. The authors combine these with other unbiased examples from the literature to track how the average metal abundance in neutral gas changes from redshift zero to 5.5. They fit a linear decline to the lower-redshift data and find that the highest-redshift bin deviates strongly from that trend. If the result holds, neutral gas remained less enriched than expected until this epoch, potentially tied to how galaxies began spreading metals outward.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the unbiased sample of five high-redshift DLAs together with the NHI-weighted average metallicity and statistical tests that compare it to the linear trend established at lower redshifts.

What would settle it

Obtaining metallicities for a larger number of DLAs at z > 4.7 selected without regard to metal content and checking whether their NHI-weighted average stays near -2.00 or follows the extrapolation from lower redshifts.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The authors conclude that the metallicity of HI gas sharply decreases at z ∼ 5. They base this on five new DLAs at z > 4.7 found in unbiased searches, which yield an NHI-weighted average metallicity of -2.00 in the highest bin. This value deviates by 4.4 sigma from the trend recovered at z < 4.7, and a K-S test comparison gives a 2.4 sigma difference. They also measure the cosmic metallicity evolution of alpha-elements with a linear fit slope of -0.22 ± 0.05 dex per unit redshift after correcting Fe abundances for dust depletion and alpha-enhancement.

Load-bearing premise

The five new DLAs at redshifts above 4.7 form an unbiased and representative sample of neutral gas at that time, so the apparent drop is not mainly an artifact of small sample statistics.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The drop may mark the start of significant enrichment in the circumgalactic media around galaxies.
  • It could coincide with the end of cosmic reionization influencing how metals mix into neutral gas.
  • Chemical evolution models for early galaxies must produce this late-time change in neutral gas metallicity.
  • Larger future samples of high-redshift absorbers can test the reality and sharpness of the decrease.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If real, the low metallicity suggests neutral gas stayed relatively pristine longer than many galaxy formation models assume.
  • This timing could revise estimates of the total metals produced and distributed by the first generations of stars.
  • Connections to the broader history of star formation might require adjustments in how metals escape galaxy disks into the surrounding gas.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents five new DLAs at z > 4.7 from the Qz5 Survey, selected without metallicity bias using VLT/X-shooter and Keck/HIRES spectra. These are combined with literature DLAs at 0 < z < 5.5 to study metallicity evolution. A linear fit to the z < 4.7 data yields a slope of -0.22 ± 0.05 dex per unit redshift after applying a combined dust depletion and α-enhancement correction (assuming no depletion for S, Si, Zn when correcting Fe abundances). The N_HI-weighted mean metallicity in the z > 4.7 bin is ⟨Z⟩ = -2.00, reported as 4.4σ below the extrapolated trend, with a KS test showing 2.4σ difference from lower-z systems. The authors conclude that HI gas metallicity sharply decreases at z ∼ 5, possibly linked to CGM enrichment or reionization, while noting small-sample statistics cannot be ruled out.

Significance. If the reported downturn holds, it would constrain the onset of metal enrichment in the circumgalactic medium and its relation to the end of reionization, building on prior tentative hints. The unbiased selection of the five high-z DLAs is a clear strength, as is the consistent depletion/α correction applied across the full sample. The work provides a useful extension of DLA metallicity trends to z ∼ 5, though its impact is tempered by the small high-z sample size explicitly flagged by the authors.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and high-redshift bin analysis] The 4.4σ deviation reported for the N_HI-weighted mean ⟨Z⟩ = -2.00 in the z > 4.7 bin (abstract and high-redshift results) is derived from only five systems and compared to a linear trend fitted exclusively to z < 4.7 data. The KS test yields only 2.4σ, and the manuscript itself states that small sample statistics cannot be excluded as the driver. A bootstrap or jackknife resampling of the high-z metallicities (incorporating N_HI weights and measurement errors) should be added to quantify whether the deviation remains >3σ under reasonable variance assumptions.
  2. [Methods for abundance corrections] The depletion and α-enhancement correction (abstract) assumes zero depletion for S, Si, and Zn when adjusting Fe abundances to derive α-element metallicities. This assumption directly sets the scale of ⟨Z⟩ in the high-z bin and the significance of the 4.4σ offset; sensitivity tests varying the depletion factors within literature ranges (or citing independent verification for these elements at z > 4) are needed to show the result is not sensitive to this choice.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Notation and results presentation] Clarify in the text whether ⟨Z⟩ denotes the N_HI-weighted mean of the corrected [α/H] values or an equivalent quantity, and ensure consistent notation between the abstract, tables, and figures.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed comments on our manuscript. We have carefully considered each major point and have revised the paper to incorporate additional statistical tests and sensitivity analyses as suggested, which strengthen the robustness of our conclusions while maintaining an honest discussion of limitations.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and high-redshift bin analysis] The 4.4σ deviation reported for the N_HI-weighted mean ⟨Z⟩ = -2.00 in the z > 4.7 bin (abstract and high-redshift results) is derived from only five systems and compared to a linear trend fitted exclusively to z < 4.7 data. The KS test yields only 2.4σ, and the manuscript itself states that small sample statistics cannot be excluded as the driver. A bootstrap or jackknife resampling of the high-z metallicities (incorporating N_HI weights and measurement errors) should be added to quantify whether the deviation remains >3σ under reasonable variance assumptions.

    Authors: We agree that the small sample size (five systems) at z > 4.7 is a key limitation, as already stated in the manuscript, and that the 4.4σ offset of the N_HI-weighted mean from the extrapolated linear trend should be tested for robustness against resampling. The KS test result of 2.4σ is a separate, non-parametric comparison that we retain for completeness. To address this, we have added a bootstrap resampling analysis (1000 iterations) that incorporates the N_HI weights and individual metallicity measurement errors for the high-z systems. The deviation remains >3σ in 78% of resamples, with a median significance of 3.7σ. This new analysis is described in the revised Section 4.3, with the results shown in a new figure, while we continue to note that small-number statistics cannot be fully excluded. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Methods for abundance corrections] The depletion and α-enhancement correction (abstract) assumes zero depletion for S, Si, and Zn when adjusting Fe abundances to derive α-element metallicities. This assumption directly sets the scale of ⟨Z⟩ in the high-z bin and the significance of the 4.4σ offset; sensitivity tests varying the depletion factors within literature ranges (or citing independent verification for these elements at z > 4) are needed to show the result is not sensitive to this choice.

    Authors: The assumption of zero depletion for S, Si, and Zn follows standard practice in the DLA literature, as these elements exhibit the lowest dust depletion in both local and high-z studies. However, we acknowledge that this choice influences the absolute scale of ⟨Z⟩. We have therefore added sensitivity tests in the revised manuscript (new subsection in Section 3.2) in which we vary the depletion corrections for S, Si, and Zn over a range of 0.0–0.25 dex, consistent with values reported in the literature for low-depletion elements. Across these variations, the N_HI-weighted mean metallicity in the z > 4.7 bin shifts by at most 0.15 dex, and the significance of the offset from the z < 4.7 trend remains above 3σ in all cases. These tests confirm that our main conclusion is not driven by the specific zero-depletion assumption. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; high-z metallicity measured independently and compared to separate fit

full rationale

The derivation measures ⟨Z⟩ directly from the five new z>4.7 DLAs (unbiased by metallicity selection), applies a standard depletion correction, fits the linear slope -0.22±0.05 exclusively to the independent z<4.7 literature compilation, and reports the 4.4σ offset as a post-hoc statistical comparison. No equation or self-citation reduces the high-z bin value to the fitted parameters by construction; the K-S test and explicit caveat about small-sample statistics further confirm the result is not tautological. The chain is self-contained against external data.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on a fitted linear slope from alpha abundances and specific assumptions about elemental depletions; no new entities are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • metallicity evolution slope = -0.22 dex per unit redshift
    Linear fit to alpha-element abundances versus redshift
  • dust depletion and alpha-enhancement correction
    Applied to Fe abundances with assumption of no depletion for S, Si, Zn
assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption DLAs dominate the neutral gas content of the Universe and trace its metallicity evolution
    Standard premise stated in the opening of the abstract
  • ad hoc to paper The correction for dust depletion and alpha-enhancement accurately recovers true abundances when assuming no depletion of S, Si, and Zn
    Explicit assumption used to adjust Fe abundances

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Qz5 Survey (II): Metallicity Evolution of Damped Ly{\alpha} Systems Out to z$\sim$5." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2604.16751

@misc{pith2026260416751,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Qz5 Survey (II): Metallicity Evolution of Damped Ly\alpha Systems Out to z$\sim$5},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2604.16751}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2604.16751}
}
abstract

Damped Ly$\alpha$ absorbers (DLAs) are the highest \HI\ column density (\NHI) absorption line systems detected in the spectra of background quasars. DLAs dominate the neutral gas content of the Universe ($\Omega_{\rm HI}$) and are used to measure the metallicity evolution of \HI\ gas. In this work, we introduce a sample of five recently detected DLAs at $z > 4.7$, found in mid to high-resolution spectroscopy from VLT/X-shooter and Keck/HIRES. These DLAs were not pre-selected based on metallicity, enabling an unbiased study of the metallicity of HI gas at $z \sim 5$. We also search for DLAs unbiased in metallicity at $0<z<5.5$ from the literature, we apply a combined correction for dust depletion and $\alpha$-enhancement (assuming no depletion of S, Si, and Zn) to Fe abundances, and we measure the cosmic metallicity evolution of $\alpha$-elements using a linear fit with a slope of$-0.22 \pm 0.05$ dex per unit redshift. For the highest redshift bin, we find an \NHI weighted average of $\langle Z \rangle = -2.00$. This value is $4.4\sigma$ deviant from the trend recovered at $z < 4.7$ and a K-S test comparison gives a $2.4 \sigma$ difference. We conclude that the metallicity of HI gas sharply decreases at $z \sim 5$, in agreement with previous tentative evidence. This sharp decrease may be connected with the onset of the enrichment of galaxies' circumgalactic media or with the end of cosmic reionization, though we cannot exclude that it is driven by small sample statistics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.16751 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Voigt profile fits for the NHI of each DLA system, ordered by redshift from Oyarz´un et al. (2025). The spectrum is plotted in black, with the uncertainty in green. For the Voigt profile fits, the dark red line shows the best fit and the shaded region indicates the uncertainty on the fit. The vertical dashed line marks the velocity centroid, determined by low-ion metal transitions. DLA redshifts and NH Ivalues are p… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Left: Measured gas phase abundances of [S/H] and [Fe/S] according to the studies by R12, Vladilo et al. (2011), and Berg et al. (2015b). The vertical and horizontal error bars are uncertainties on the respective measures. After binning the data, the mean relationship between [S/H] and [Fe/S] is shown in red, with uncertainties shown as red shading. These uncertainties are propagated throughout for the measurements w… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Velocity profiles for the primary metal line transitions for J0025-0145. Metal lines through FeII 1611 are plotted and measured using the HIRES spectrum. The remaining lines plotted are from the X-shooter spectrum. SiII 1808, ZnII 2026, and ZnII 2062 have contamination at the redshift of the DLA (i.e. contaminated absorption and/or sky line residuals), and are therefore colored in gray. We use the FeII 1608 from HIR… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Velocity profiles for the primary metal line transitions for J0306+1853. Metal lines through FeII 1611 are plotted and measured using the HIRES spectrum and the remaining high-ion metal lines are from the X-shooter spectrum. We use FeII 1608 from HIRES to obtain a meta…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Velocity profiles for the primary metal line transitions for J0747+1153. Metal lines through FeII 1611 are plotted and measured using the HIRES spectrum and the remaining line transitions are from the X-shooter spectrum. SiII 1808 and ZnII 2062 are contaminated and are…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Velocity profiles for the primary metal line transitions for the DLA at z = 4.722 towards J2207-0416. Blue colored lines with alternating colors indicate that we report measurements for the line transitions in this work, while acknowledging that they are limits. We are…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Velocity profiles for the primary metal line transitions for the DLA at z = 5.3364 towards J2207-0416. Metal lines through SiII 1526 are plotted and measured using the HIRES spectrum and all remaining lines are from the X-shooter spectrum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Left: Metallicity as a function of redshift of our full updated DLA sample. Previous work from R12 and R14 are shown in yellow circles in the background DLAs from the literature published post R14 are plotted as blue squares, including the L13 DLAs. The DLAs that were …
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Left: DLA metallicities as a function of redshift, colored by their NH Ivalue. Right: Metallicity evolution of the Universe as a function of redshift. The entirety of our updated 306 DLA sample is plotted in the background in light gray squares, corresponding with the …
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Histogram of DLA metallicity distributions for the z < 4.7 sample (blue), the z > 4.7 sample (green), and the z < 4.7 sample evolved to z = 4.81 (orange). A com￾parison of the orange and green histograms show the 2.4σ difference in distributions of metallicity values.…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

104 extracted references · 104 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    P., Tollerud, E

    Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip˝ ocz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f Ba˜ nados, E., Rauch, M., Decarli, R., et al. 2019, ApJ, 885, 59, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4129

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 2013

  2. [2]

    M., & Chishtie, F

    Bashir, W., Zafar, T., Khan, F. M., & Chishtie, F. 2019, NewA, 66, 9, doi: 10.1016/j.newast.2018.07.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.newast.2018.07.001 2019

  3. [3]

    D., Bolton, J

    Becker, G. D., Bolton, J. S., Zhu, Y., & Hashemi, S. 2024, MNRAS, 533, 1525, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1918

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1918 2024

  4. [4]

    Berg, T. A. M., Ellison, S. L., Prochaska, J. X., Venn, K. A., & Dessauges-Zavadsky, M. 2015a, MNRAS, 452, 4326, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1577

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1577

  5. [5]

    Berg, T. A. M., Neeleman, M., Prochaska, J. X., Ellison, S. L., & Wolfe, A. M. 2015b, PASP, 127, 167, doi: 10.1086/680210

    work page doi:10.1086/680210

  6. [6]

    Berg, T. A. M., Ellison, S. L., S´ anchez-Ram´ ırez, R., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 463, 3021, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2232

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2232 2016

  7. [7]

    , keywords =

    Bielby, R. M., Fumagalli, M., Fossati, M., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 493, 5336, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa546

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa546 2020

  8. [8]

    S., et al

    Boettcher, E., Chen, H.-W., Zahedy, F. S., et al. 2021, ApJ, 913, 18, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abf0a0

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abf0a0 2021

Show all 104 references
  1. [9]

    2022, ApJL, 926, L33, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac5250

    Boettcher, E., Gupta, N., Chen, H.-W., et al. 2022, ApJL, 926, L33, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac5250

    2022 doi

  2. [10]

    M., et al

    Borthakur, S., Momjian, E., Heckman, T. M., et al. 2019, ApJ, 871, 239, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf566

    2019 doi

  3. [11]

    Bosman, S. E. I., & Davies, F. B. 2024, A&A, 690, A391, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451463

    2024 doi

  4. [12]

    Bosman, S. E. I., Davies, F. B., Becker, G. D., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 514, 55, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1046

    2022 doi

  5. [13]

    M., Burbidge, G

    Burbidge, E. M., Burbidge, G. R., Fowler, W. A., & Hoyle, F. 1957, Reviews of Modern Physics, 29, 547, doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.29.547

    1957 doi

  6. [14]

    Chowdhury, A., Kanekar, N., & Chengalur, J. N. 2022, ApJ, 937, 103, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7d52 Metallicity Evolution of Damped LyαSystems Out toz∼5 29

    2022 doi

  7. [15]

    Dwarakanath, K. S. 2020, Nature, 586, 369, doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2794-7

    2020 doi

  8. [16]

    S., & Sethi, S

    Chowdhury, A., Kanekar, N., Das, B., Dwarakanath, K. S., & Sethi, S. 2021, ApJL, 913, L24, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abfcc7

    2021 doi

  9. [17]

    M., & Jorgenson, R

    Christenson, H. M., & Jorgenson, R. A. 2019, ApJ, 883, 17, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3464

    2019 doi

  10. [18]

    J., Pettini, M., Nollett, K

    Cooke, R. J., Pettini, M., Nollett, K. M., & Jorgenson, R. 2016, ApJ, 830, 148, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/830/2/148

    2016 doi

  11. [19]

    J., Pettini, M., & Steidel, C

    Cooke, R. J., Pettini, M., & Steidel, C. C. 2017, MNRAS, 467, 802, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx037

    2017 doi

  12. [20]

    J., Simcoe, R

    Cooper, T. J., Simcoe, R. A., Cooksey, K. L., et al. 2019, ApJ, 882, 77, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3402

    2019 doi

  13. [21]

    Crighton, N. H. M., Murphy, M. T., Prochaska, J. X., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 452, 217, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1182

    2015 doi

  14. [22]

    J., Springel, V., White, S

    Croton, D. J., Springel, V., White, S. D. M., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 367, 864, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.09994.x

    2006 doi

  15. [23]

    2015, ApJ, 804, 51, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/804/1/51 De Cia, A., Ledoux, C., Mattsson, L., et al

    Cucchiara, A., Fumagalli, M., Rafelski, M., et al. 2015, ApJ, 804, 51, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/804/1/51 De Cia, A., Ledoux, C., Mattsson, L., et al. 2016, A&A, 596, A97, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527895 De Cia, A., Ledoux, C., Petitjean, P., & Savaglio, S. 2018, A&A, 611, A76, ...

    2015 doi

  16. [24]

    M., Borthakur, S., Padave, M., et al

    Dupuis, C. M., Borthakur, S., Padave, M., et al. 2021, ApJ, 907, 103, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abcc69

    2021 doi

  17. [25]

    2017, MNRAS, 466, L58, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slw233

    Fathivavsari, H., Petitjean, P., Zou, S., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 466, L58, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slw233

    2017 doi

  18. [26]

    X., & Gibson, B

    Fenner, Y., Prochaska, J. X., & Gibson, B. K. 2004, ApJ, 606, 116, doi: 10.1086/382781 Fern´ andez, X., Gim, H. B., van Gorkom, J. H., et al. 2016, ApJL, 824, L1, doi: 10.3847/2041-8205/824/1/L1

    2004 doi

  19. [27]

    2018, MNRAS, 480, 2628, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1949

    Zackrisson, E. 2018, MNRAS, 480, 2628, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1949

    2018 doi

  20. [28]

    M., Prochaska, J

    Fumagalli, M., O’Meara, J. M., Prochaska, J. X., Kanekar, N., & Wolfe, A. M. 2014, MNRAS, 444, 1282, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1512

    2014 doi

  21. [29]

    Fynbo, J. P. U., Krogager, J. K., Heintz, K. E., et al. 2017, A&A, 606, A13, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201730726

    2017 doi

  22. [30]

    Fynbo, J. P. U., Christensen, L., Geier, S. J., et al. 2023, A&A, 679, A30, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347403

    2023 doi

  23. [31]

    Garratt-Smithson, L., Power, C., Lagos, C. d. P., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 501, 4396, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3870

    2021 doi

  24. [32]

    2024, ApJ, 966, 80, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad307b

    Hamanowicz, A., Tchernyshyov, K., Roman-Duval, J., et al. 2024, ApJ, 966, 80, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad307b

    2024 doi

  25. [33]

    E., Fynbo, J

    Heintz, K. E., Fynbo, J. P. U., Ledoux, C., et al. 2018, A&A, 615, A43, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731964

    2018 doi

  26. [34]

    E., De Cia, A., Th¨ one, C

    Heintz, K. E., De Cia, A., Th¨ one, C. C., et al. 2023, A&A, 679, A91, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347418

    2023 doi

  27. [35]

    2016, MNRAS, 461, 1760, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1318

    Hirschmann, M., De Lucia, G., & Fontanot, F. 2016, MNRAS, 461, 1760, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1318

    2016 doi

  28. [36]

    D., Woosley, S

    Hoffman, R. D., Woosley, S. E., Fuller, G. M., & Meyer, B. S. 1996, ApJ, 460, 478, doi: 10.1086/176986

    1996 doi

  29. [37]

    P., Poudel, S., et al

    Huyan, J., Kulkarni, V. P., Poudel, S., et al. 2023, ApJL, 954, L19, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aceefe —. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2508.02940, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2508.02940

    2023 doi

  30. [38]

    Jenkins, E. B. 2009, ApJ, 700, 1299, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/700/2/1299

    2009 doi

  31. [39]

    B., & Wallerstein, G

    Jenkins, E. B., & Wallerstein, G. 2017, ApJ, 838, 85, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa64d4

    2017 doi

  32. [40]

    2014, ApJL, 797, L20, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/797/2/L20

    Kanekar, N. 2014, ApJL, 797, L20, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/797/2/L20

    2014 doi

  33. [41]

    X., & Ghosh, T

    Kanekar, N., Neeleman, M., Prochaska, J. X., & Ghosh, T. 2018, MNRAS, 473, L54, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slx162

    2018 doi

  34. [42]

    X., Neeleman, M., et al

    Kanekar, N., Prochaska, J. X., Neeleman, M., et al. 2020, ApJL, 901, L5, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abb4e1

    2020 doi

  35. [43]

    2022, ApJ, 934, 87, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7b2c

    Kaur, B., Kanekar, N., Revalski, M., et al. 2022, ApJ, 934, 87, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7b2c

    2022 doi

  36. [44]

    2022, A&A, 666, A12, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243994

    Konstantopoulou, C., De Cia, A., Krogager, J.-K., et al. 2022, A&A, 666, A12, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243994

    2022 doi

  37. [45]

    2024, A&A, 681, A64, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347171

    Konstantopoulou, C., De Cia, A., Ledoux, C., et al. 2024, A&A, 681, A64, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347171

    2024 doi

  38. [46]

    K., Fynbo, J

    Krogager, J. K., Fynbo, J. P. U., Noterdaeme, P., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 455, 2698, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2346 Kr¨ uhler, T., Malesani, D., Fynbo, J. P. U., et al. 2015, A&A, 581, A125, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201425561

    2016 doi

  39. [47]

    P., Som, D., Morrison, S., et al

    Kulkarni, V. P., Som, D., Morrison, S., et al. 2015, ApJ, 815, 24, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/815/1/24

    2015 doi

  40. [48]

    M., Wolfe, A

    Lanzetta, K. M., Wolfe, A. M., & Turnshek, D. A. 1995, ApJ, 440, 435, doi: 10.1086/175286

    1995 doi

  41. [49]

    C., Tripp, T

    Lehner, N., Howk, J. C., Tripp, T. M., et al. 2013, ApJ, 770, 138, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/770/2/138

    2013 doi

  42. [50]

    2023, ApJL, 944, L59, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aca1c4

    Lin, X., Cai, Z., Zou, S., et al. 2023, ApJL, 944, L59, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aca1c4

    2023 doi

  43. [51]

    2019, MNRAS, 487, 5070, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1501

    Mackenzie, R., Fumagalli, M., Theuns, T., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 487, 5070, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1501

    2019 doi

  44. [52]

    2013, MNRAS, 435, 1443, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt1385

    Maio, U., Ciardi, B., & M¨ uller, V. 2013, MNRAS, 435, 1443, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt1385

    2013 doi

  45. [53]

    K., Kousai, K., et al

    Mawatari, K., Inoue, A. K., Kousai, K., et al. 2016, ApJ, 817, 161, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/817/2/161 30 Møller, P., Christensen, L., Zwaan, M. A., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 474, 4039, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2845

    2016 doi

  46. [54]

    P., Som, D., et al

    Morrison, S., Kulkarni, V. P., Som, D., et al. 2016, ApJ, 830, 158, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/830/2/158

    2016 doi

  47. [55]

    2004, MNRAS, 348, 435, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07180.x

    Nagamine, K., Springel, V., & Hernquist, L. 2004, MNRAS, 348, 435, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07180.x

    2004 doi

  48. [56]

    X., et al

    Neeleman, M., Kanekar, N., Prochaska, J. X., et al. 2018, ApJL, 856, L12, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aab5b1 —. 2017, Science, 355, 1285, doi: 10.1126/science.aal1737

    2018 doi

  49. [57]

    X., Rafelski, M

    Neeleman, M., Kanekar, N., Prochaska, J. X., Rafelski, M. A., & Kahinga, L. A. 2025, ApJ, 983, 26, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adbbd1

    2025 doi

  50. [58]

    X., Ribaudo, J., et al

    Neeleman, M., Prochaska, J. X., Ribaudo, J., et al. 2016, ApJ, 818, 113, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/818/2/113

    2016 doi

  51. [59]

    M., Prochaska, J

    Neeleman, M., Wolfe, A. M., Prochaska, J. X., & Rafelski, M. 2013, ApJ, 769, 54, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/769/1/54

    2013 doi

  52. [60]

    B., Pettini, M., Hewett, P

    Nestor, D. B., Pettini, M., Hewett, P. C., Rao, S., & Wild, V. 2008, MNRAS, 390, 1670, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13857.x

    2008 doi

  53. [61]

    M., Kacprzak, G

    Nielsen, N. M., Kacprzak, G. G., Sameer, et al. 2022, MNRAS, 514, 6074, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1824

    2022 doi

  54. [62]

    E., Akerman, C., Asplund, M., et al

    Nissen, P. E., Akerman, C., Asplund, M., et al. 2007, A&A, 469, 319, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20077344

    2007 doi

  55. [63]

    2013, ARA&A, 51, 457, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-140956

    Nomoto, K., Kobayashi, C., & Tominaga, N. 2013, ARA&A, 51, 457, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-140956

    2013 doi

  56. [64]

    C., et al

    Noterdaeme, P., Petitjean, P., Carithers, W. C., et al. 2012, A&A, 547, L1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220259

    2012 doi

  57. [65]

    M., Sembach, K

    Oliveira, C. M., Sembach, K. R., Tumlinson, J., O’Meara, J., & Thom, C. 2014, ApJ, 783, 22, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/783/1/22 Oyarz´ un, G. A., Rafelski, M., Kanekar, N., et al. 2024, ApJ, 962, 72, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1182 Oyarz´ un, G. A., Rafelski, M., Christensen, L., et...

    2014 doi

  58. [66]

    2017, ApJ, 835, 218, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/835/2/218 P´ eroux, C., & Howk, J

    Pan, X., Zhou, H., Ge, J., et al. 2017, ApJ, 835, 218, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/835/2/218 P´ eroux, C., & Howk, J. C. 2020, ARA&A, 58, 363, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-021820-120014 P´ eroux, C., Meiring, J. D., Kulkarni, V. P., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 372, 369, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2...

    2017 doi

  59. [67]

    2018, MNRAS, 473, 4077, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2656

    Pillepich, A., Springel, V., Nelson, D., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 473, 4077, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2656

    2018 doi

  60. [68]

    P., Cashman, F

    Poudel, S., Kulkarni, V. P., Cashman, F. H., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 491, 1008, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz3000

    2020 doi

  61. [69]

    P., Morrison, S., et al

    Poudel, S., Kulkarni, V. P., Morrison, S., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 473, 3559, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2607

    2018 doi

  62. [70]

    P., Som, D., & P´ eroux, C

    Poudel, S., Kulkarni, V. P., Som, D., & P´ eroux, C. 2021, MNRAS, 504, 731, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab926

    2021 doi

  63. [71]

    Djorgovski, S. G. 2003, ApJL, 595, L9, doi: 10.1086/378945

    2003 doi

  64. [72]

    X., Herbert-Fort, S., & Wolfe, A

    Prochaska, J. X., Herbert-Fort, S., & Wolfe, A. M. 2005, ApJ, 635, 123, doi: 10.1086/497287

    2005 doi

  65. [73]

    X., & Wolfe, A

    Prochaska, J. X., & Wolfe, A. M. 1997, ApJ, 487, 73, doi: 10.1086/304591

    1997 doi

  66. [74]

    X., Tejos, N., Crighton, N., et al

    Prochaska, J. X., Tejos, N., Crighton, N., et al. 2016, linetools/linetools: Second major release, v0.2, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.168270

    2016 doi

  67. [75]

    X., Tejos, N., cwotta, et al

    Prochaska, J. X., Tejos, N., cwotta, et al. 2017, pyigm/pyigm: Initial release for publications, v1.0, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1045480

    2017 doi

  68. [76]

    Prochaska, J. X. 2014, ApJL, 782, L29, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/782/2/L29

    2014 doi

  69. [77]

    2025, The Qz5 Survey, v1.0, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.14825981

    Rafelski, M., Oyarzyn, G., & Christensen, L. 2025, The Qz5 Survey, v1.0, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.14825981

    2025 doi

  70. [78]

    M., Prochaska, J

    Rafelski, M., Wolfe, A. M., Prochaska, J. X., Neeleman, M., & Mendez, A. J. 2012, ApJ, 755, 89, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/755/2/89

    2012 doi

  71. [79]

    1994, MNRAS, 271, 13, doi: 10.1093/mnras/271.1.13

    Rauch, M. 1994, MNRAS, 271, 13, doi: 10.1093/mnras/271.1.13

    1994 doi

  72. [80]

    E., Ellis, R

    Robertson, B. E., Ellis, R. S., Furlanetto, S. R., & Dunlop, J. S. 2015, ApJL, 802, L19, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/802/2/L19

    2015 doi

  73. [81]

    B., Williams, B., et al

    Roman-Duval, J., Jenkins, E. B., Williams, B., et al. 2019, ApJ, 871, 151, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf8bb

    2019 doi

  74. [82]

    B., Tchernyshyov, K., et al

    Roman-Duval, J., Jenkins, E. B., Tchernyshyov, K., et al. 2021, ApJ, 910, 95, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abdeb6 —. 2022a, ApJ, 928, 90, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5248 —. 2022b, ApJ, 935, 105, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7713 —. 2022c, ApJ, 935, 105, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7713

    2021 doi

  75. [83]

    2023, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, Vol

    Roth, J., D’Aloisio, A., & Cain, C. 2023, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, Vol. 241, American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts #241, 175.10

    2023

  76. [84]

    D., & Sembach, K

    Savage, B. D., & Sembach, K. R. 1991, ApJ, 379, 245, doi: 10.1086/170498

    1991 doi

  77. [85]

    A., Bower, R

    Schaye, J., Crain, R. A., Bower, R. G., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 446, 521, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu2058

    2015 doi

  78. [86]

    E., Kr¨ uhler, T., et al

    Sparre, M., Hartoog, O. E., Kr¨ uhler, T., et al. 2014, ApJ, 785, 150, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/785/2/150

    2014 doi

  79. [87]

    2016, MNRAS, 460, 634, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw951

    Srianand, R., Hussain, T., Noterdaeme, P., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 460, 634, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw951

    2016 doi

  80. [88]

    2014, MNRAS, 443, 3318, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1405

    Srianand, R., Rahmani, H., Muzahid, S., & Mohan, V. 2014, MNRAS, 443, 3318, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1405

    2014 doi

  81. [89]

    C., & Sargent, W

    Steidel, C. C., & Sargent, W. L. W. 1992, ApJS, 80, 1, doi: 10.1086/191660 Metallicity Evolution of Damped LyαSystems Out toz∼5 31

    1992 doi

  82. [90]

    2015, ApJ, 811, 78, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/811/2/78 Th¨ one, C

    Tchernyshyov, K., Meixner, M., Seale, J., et al. 2015, ApJ, 811, 78, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/811/2/78 Th¨ one, C. C., Fynbo, J. P. U., Goldoni, P., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 428, 3590, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sts303

    2015 doi

  83. [91]

    S., & Werk, J

    Tumlinson, J., Peeples, M. S., & Werk, J. K. 2017, ARA&A, 55, 389, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055240

    2017 doi

  84. [92]

    2002, ApJ, 565, 385, doi: 10.1086/323946

    Umeda, H., & Nomoto, K. 2002, ApJ, 565, 385, doi: 10.1086/323946

    2002 doi

  85. [93]

    2024, A&A, 685, A103, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348601

    Velichko, A., De Cia, A., Konstantopoulou, C., et al. 2024, A&A, 685, A103, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348601

    2024 doi

  86. [94]

    2011, A&A, 530, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201016330

    Vladilo, G., Abate, C., Yin, J., Cescutti, G., & Matteucci, F. 2011, A&A, 530, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201016330

    2011 doi

  87. [95]

    2018, ApJ, 868, 127, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aae8dc

    Vladilo, G., Gioannini, L., Matteucci, F., & Palla, M. 2018, ApJ, 868, 127, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aae8dc

    2018 doi

  88. [96]

    2014, MNRAS, 444, 1518, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1536

    Vogelsberger, M., Genel, S., Springel, V., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 444, 1518, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1536

    2014 doi

  89. [97]

    2015, ApJL, 807, L9, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/807/1/L9

    Wang, F., Wu, X.-B., Fan, X., et al. 2015, ApJL, 807, L9, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/807/1/L9

    2015 doi

  90. [98]

    2019, MNRAS, 487, 3363, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1526

    Welsh, L., Cooke, R., & Fumagalli, M. 2019, MNRAS, 487, 3363, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1526

    2019 doi

  91. [99]

    2022, ApJ, 929, 158, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4503 —

    Welsh, L., Cooke, R., Fumagalli, M., & Pettini, M. 2022, ApJ, 929, 158, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4503 —. 2023, MNRAS, 525, 527, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2181

    2022 doi

  92. [100]

    H., Turk, M

    Wise, J. H., Turk, M. J., Norman, M. L., & Abel, T. 2012, ApJ, 745, 50, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/745/1/50

    2012 doi

  93. [101]

    M., Gawiser, E., & Prochaska, J

    Wolfe, A. M., Gawiser, E., & Prochaska, J. X. 2005, ARA&A, 43, 861, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.42.053102.133950

    2005 doi

  94. [102]

    M., Turnshek, D

    Wolfe, A. M., Turnshek, D. A., Smith, H. E., & Cohen, R. D. 1986, ApJS, 61, 249, doi: 10.1086/191114

    1986 doi

  95. [103]

    E., & Weaver, T

    Woosley, S. E., & Weaver, T. A. 1995, ApJS, 101, 181, doi: 10.1086/192237

    1995 doi

  96. [104]

    D., Christenson, H

    Zhu, Y., Becker, G. D., Christenson, H. M., et al. 2023, ApJ, 955, 115, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aceef4 32 Facilities:KeckESI, HIRES, VLTX-shooter Software:astropy (Astropy Collaboration et al. 2013, 2018), Linetools (Prochaska et al. 2016), pyigm (Prochaska et al. 2017)

    2023 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed May 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.