pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.16784 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-18 · 🪐 quant-ph

Recognition: unknown

Learning Non-Markovian Noise via Ensemble Optimal Control

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 07:33 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords non-Markovian quantum systemsparameter estimationoptimal controlmachine learningquantum noiseCramér-Rao boundensemble trainingdissipation rate
0
0 comments X

The pith

A machine learning scheme trained on an ensemble of non-Markovian systems sets the optimal measurement time for estimating noise parameters such as dissipation rate and memory time.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a protocol that uses machine learning to train a control scheme across a representative collection of non-Markovian quantum open systems. This training fixes the measurement time in advance so that enough information about the environment is gathered before dissipation erases it. The resulting scheme remains effective even when the training data contain errors and reaches uncertainties close to the quantum Cramér-Rao limit by taking advantage of memory effects that persist in non-Markovian dynamics. A reader would care because precise characterization of environmental noise is essential for reliable quantum information processing, yet conventional methods require either detailed prior knowledge or trial-and-error timing that is impractical in real devices.

Core claim

We study the estimation of parameters pertaining to non-Markovian quantum open systems, such as the dissipation rate and environmental memory time. A key challenge is identifying the optimal measurement time, which must allow sufficient time to acquire information about the environment, yet be short enough to avoid dissipation that erases the information. Using machine learning approaches, we develop an optimized control scheme trained over a representative ensemble to fix the optimal measurement time at a prescribed runtime. The protocol is robust to errors in the training process, enhances precision by exploiting non-Markovian memory effects, and achieves measurement uncertainties that can

What carries the argument

The ensemble-trained optimal control scheme that automatically selects the measurement runtime for a given non-Markovian system.

If this is right

  • The same trained scheme can be reused across many different non-Markovian environments without retraining for each new set of parameters.
  • Precision improves beyond Markovian limits because the control deliberately uses the persisting memory correlations.
  • The method tolerates inaccuracies in the training data, so laboratory imperfections do not destroy performance.
  • Measurement uncertainties can be made to approach the fundamental quantum bound set by the Cramér-Rao inequality.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The ensemble approach may be extended to simultaneous estimation of several noise parameters by expanding the training set to include joint distributions.
  • Similar training could be applied to other timing-sensitive quantum tasks such as dynamical decoupling or gate optimization in noisy environments.
  • Experimental validation would require preparing a tunable non-Markovian bath whose parameters can be varied independently of the training set.

Load-bearing premise

An ensemble of representative training systems produces a control scheme that generalizes reliably to unknown real-world non-Markovian systems without prior knowledge of their exact parameters.

What would settle it

Apply the trained scheme to a non-Markovian system whose dissipation rate and memory time lie well outside the training ensemble and measure whether the achieved uncertainty remains within a few percent of the Cramér-Rao bound.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.16784 by Da-Wei Luo, Ting Yu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (Color online) For an example of the TLS dephas [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (Color online) Learning the memory parameter with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (Color online) Robustness of the estimation to errors [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (Color online) Panel (a) The closeness of the uncer [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Panel(a) QFI dynamics for the optimization of final QFI for a single [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Monotonic convergence of the algorithm: for the example in the main text on the estimation of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Line fit result for a measurement of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (Color online) Estimation of Ω of the dephasing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (Color online) Estimation of the central frequency Ω. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. (Color online) Estimation of the coupling strength Γ, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. (Color online) Estimation of the coupling strength Γ, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. (Color online) Estimation of the coupling strength Γ, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. (Color online) Estimation of the coupling strength [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. (Color online) Estimation of the memory parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. (Color online) Estimation of the memory parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. (Color online) Estimation of the memory parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. (Color online) Estimation of the memory parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_15.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study the estimation of parameters pertaining to non-Markovian quantum open systems, such as the dissipation rate and environmental memory time. A key challenge is identifying the optimal measurement time, which must allow sufficient time to acquire information about the environment, yet be short enough to avoid dissipation that erases the information. Using machine learning approaches, we develop an optimized control scheme trained over a representative ensemble to fix the optimal measurement time at a prescribed runtime. The protocol is robust to errors in the training process, enhances precision by exploiting non-Markovian memory effects, and achieves measurement uncertainties approaching the quantum limits set by the Cram\'{e}r-Rao bound.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a machine learning protocol based on ensemble optimal control to optimize the measurement time for estimating parameters (dissipation rate and environmental memory time) in non-Markovian quantum open systems. By training a control scheme over a representative ensemble, the method fixes the optimal runtime to balance information acquisition against dissipation, claiming robustness to training errors, enhanced precision via exploitation of non-Markovian memory effects, and measurement uncertainties approaching the Cramér-Rao bound.

Significance. If the numerical validations and generalization tests hold, the work could offer a practical data-driven tool for quantum metrology in open systems where exact environment parameters are unknown. The ensemble-training strategy is a positive element for robustness. However, the central claims rest on unverified generalization, limiting immediate impact without stronger evidence.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claims of near-Cramér-Rao performance, robustness to training errors, and reliable generalization from the ensemble are asserted without any numerical results, error bars, or benchmark comparisons supplied in the abstract or visible methods summary; the full manuscript must include quantitative out-of-distribution tests (e.g., performance curves for memory times or dissipation rates outside the training distribution) because these are load-bearing for the central claim that the fixed runtime remains near-optimal for unknown real-world systems.
  2. [Results] Results section (assumed §4 or equivalent): the protocol's assertion that the learned control 'fixes the optimal measurement time' and approaches the quantum limit requires explicit validation that the policy remains near-optimal when the true memory kernel deviates from ensemble statistics; without parameter-shift experiments or test curves for out-of-distribution regimes, the robustness claim cannot be assessed and risks circularity with the training ensemble composition.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Methods] The notation for the non-Markovian memory kernel and the definition of the training ensemble composition should be clarified with explicit equations in the methods section to allow reproducibility.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions (if present) should include the exact training parameter ranges and the specific out-of-distribution test points used to support the generalization statements.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and outline the revisions we will make to strengthen the presentation of our results.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claims of near-Cramér-Rao performance, robustness to training errors, and reliable generalization from the ensemble are asserted without any numerical results, error bars, or benchmark comparisons supplied in the abstract or visible methods summary; the full manuscript must include quantitative out-of-distribution tests (e.g., performance curves for memory times or dissipation rates outside the training distribution) because these are load-bearing for the central claim that the fixed runtime remains near-optimal for unknown real-world systems.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract claims should be clearly tied to quantitative evidence. The manuscript body already contains numerical results in the Results section showing near-Cramér-Rao performance and robustness to training errors within the ensemble. To directly address the generalization concern, we will revise the abstract to reference these results more explicitly and add a new subsection with quantitative out-of-distribution tests, including performance curves for memory times and dissipation rates outside the training distribution, along with error bars and benchmark comparisons. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Results] Results section (assumed §4 or equivalent): the protocol's assertion that the learned control 'fixes the optimal measurement time' and approaches the quantum limit requires explicit validation that the policy remains near-optimal when the true memory kernel deviates from ensemble statistics; without parameter-shift experiments or test curves for out-of-distribution regimes, the robustness claim cannot be assessed and risks circularity with the training ensemble composition.

    Authors: We acknowledge that explicit validation for out-of-distribution regimes is necessary to substantiate the claim that the learned runtime remains near-optimal for unknown systems. The current ensemble is constructed to be representative, and we demonstrate robustness to training errors and exploitation of non-Markovian effects. In the revision we will add parameter-shift experiments and out-of-distribution test curves in the Results section to show that the policy maintains performance close to the Cramér-Rao bound when the true parameters deviate from the training statistics, thereby removing any potential circularity. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; training ensemble provides external input to claims

full rationale

The paper's protocol trains a control scheme via machine learning over a representative ensemble of non-Markovian systems to determine an optimal fixed measurement time for parameter estimation. This training step is external to the target claims about robustness to training errors, exploitation of memory effects, and proximity to the Cramér-Rao bound; the results are not defined in terms of the fitted parameters or reduced to them by construction. No equations or self-citations in the provided abstract reduce predictions to inputs, and the approach does not invoke uniqueness theorems or rename known results. The derivation chain remains self-contained against the ensemble benchmark without tautological reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that non-Markovian dynamics admit useful parameter estimation via timed measurements and that machine learning can learn a generalizable control policy from a representative ensemble; no new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • Training ensemble composition
    The set of example systems used to train the control scheme is chosen to represent typical non-Markovian environments; specific selection criteria or sizes are not detailed in the abstract.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Non-Markovian open quantum systems can be characterized by parameters such as dissipation rate and memory time that become accessible through timed measurements.
    Invoked implicitly when stating the estimation goal and the information-dissipation tradeoff.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5397 in / 1284 out tokens · 58949 ms · 2026-05-10T07:33:51.884139+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    author author C. L. \ Degen , author F. Reinhard ,\ and\ author P. Cappellaro ,\ title title Quantum sensing ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.89.035002 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 89 ,\ pages 035002 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

  2. [2]

    Korobko , author J

    author author M. Korobko , author J. S\"udbeck , author S. Steinlechner ,\ and\ author R. Schnabel ,\ title title Mitigating quantum decoherence in force sensors by internal squeezing ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.143603 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 131 ,\ pages 143603 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

  3. [3]

    Weiss , author M

    author author T. Weiss , author M. Roda-Llordes , author E. Torrontegui , author M. Aspelmeyer ,\ and\ author O. Romero-Isart ,\ title title Large quantum delocalization of a levitated nanoparticle using optimal control: Applications for force sensing and entangling via weak forces ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.023601 journal journal Phys. Re...

  4. [4]

    Abramovici , author W

    author author A. Abramovici , author W. E. \ Althouse , author R. W. P. \ Drever , author Y. G \"u rsel , author S. Kawamura , author F. J. \ Raab , author D. Shoemaker , author L. Sievers , author R. E. \ Spero , author K. S. \ Thorne , author R. E. \ Vogt , author R. Weiss , author S. E. \ Whitcomb ,\ and\ author M. E. \ Zucker ,\ title title Ligo: The ...

  5. [5]

    Goda , author O

    author author K. Goda , author O. Miyakawa , author E. E. \ Mikhailov , author S. Saraf , author R. Adhikari , author K. McKenzie , author R. Ward , author S. Vass , author A. J. \ Weinstein ,\ and\ author N. Mavalvala ,\ title title A quantum-enhanced prototype gravitational-wave detector ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys920 journal journal Nature Physics...

  6. [6]

    Aslam , author H

    author author N. Aslam , author H. Zhou , author E. K. \ Urbach , author M. J. \ Turner , author R. L. \ Walsworth , author M. D. \ Lukin ,\ and\ author H. Park ,\ title title Quantum sensors for biomedical applications ,\ @noop journal journal Nature Reviews Physics \ volume 5 ,\ pages 157 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

  7. [7]

    Zheng , author Y

    author author Z. Zheng , author Y. M. \ Sua , author S. Zhu , author P. Rehain ,\ and\ author Y.-P. \ Huang ,\ title title Non-contact elasticity contrast imaging using photon counting ,\ https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.29.7.076003 journal journal Journal of Biomedical Optics \ volume 29 ,\ pages 076003 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

  8. [8]

    author author S. F. \ Huelga , author C. Macchiavello , author T. Pellizzari , author A. K. \ Ekert , author M. B. \ Plenio ,\ and\ author J. I. \ Cirac ,\ title title Improvement of frequency standards with quantum entanglement ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.3865 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 79 ,\ pages 3865 ( year 1997 ) NoStop

  9. [9]

    author author G. S. \ Agarwal \ and\ author L. Davidovich ,\ title title Quantifying quantum-amplified metrology via Fisher information ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.L012014 journal journal Phys. Rev. Res. \ volume 4 ,\ pages L012014 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

  10. [10]

    R., Rey, A

    author author D. DeMille , author N. R. \ Hutzler , author A. M. \ Rey ,\ and\ author T. Zelevinsky ,\ title title Quantum sensing and metrology for fundamental physics with molecules ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-024-02499-9 journal journal Nature Physics \ volume 20 ,\ pages 741 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

  11. [11]

    Demkowicz-Dobrza n \' n ski \ and\ author L

    author author R. Demkowicz-Dobrza n \' n ski \ and\ author L. Maccone ,\ title title Using entanglement against noise in quantum metrology ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.250801 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 113 ,\ pages 250801 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

  12. [12]

    Kamble , author J

    author author M. Kamble , author J. Wang ,\ and\ author G. S. \ Agarwal ,\ title title Quantum metrology of absorption and gain parameters using two-mode bright squeezed light ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.109.053715 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 109 ,\ pages 053715 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

  13. [13]

    Linnemann , author H

    author author D. Linnemann , author H. Strobel , author W. Muessel , author J. Schulz , author R. J. \ Lewis-Swan , author K. V. \ Kheruntsyan ,\ and\ author M. K. \ Oberthaler ,\ title title Quantum-enhanced sensing based on time reversal of nonlinear dynamics ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.013001 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 117...

  14. [14]

    Wang , author R

    author author J. Wang , author R. L. d. M. \ Filho , author G. S. \ Agarwal ,\ and\ author L. Davidovich ,\ title title Quantum advantage of time-reversed ancilla-based metrology of absorption parameters ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.013034 journal journal Phys. Rev. Res. \ volume 6 ,\ pages 013034 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

  15. [15]

    Xia , author A

    author author Y. Xia , author A. R. \ Agrawal , author C. M. \ Pluchar , author A. J. \ Brady , author Z. Liu , author Q. Zhuang , author D. J. \ Wilson ,\ and\ author Z. Zhang ,\ title title Entanglement-enhanced optomechanical sensing ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-023-01178-0 journal journal Nature Photonics \ volume 17 ,\ pages 470 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

  16. [16]

    Yang , author B

    author author Y. Yang , author B. Yadin ,\ and\ author Z.-P. \ Xu ,\ title title Quantum-enhanced metrology with network states ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.210801 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 132 ,\ pages 210801 ( year 2024 a ) NoStop

  17. [17]

    author author H. P. \ Breuer \ and\ author F. Petruccione ,\ @noop title Theory of Open Quantum Systems \ ( publisher Oxford, New York ,\ year 2002 ) NoStop

  18. [18]

    \ Breuer , author E.-M

    author author H.-P. \ Breuer , author E.-M. \ Laine , author J. Piilo ,\ and\ author B. Vacchini ,\ title title Colloquium: Non-Markovian dynamics in open quantum systems ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.88.021002 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 88 ,\ pages 021002 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

  19. [19]

    Shrikant and P

    author author U. Shrikant \ and\ author P. Mandayam ,\ title title Quantum non-Markovianity: Overview and recent developments ,\ journal journal Frontiers in Quantum Science and Technology \ volume 2 ,\ https://doi.org/10.3389/frqst.2023.1134583 10.3389/frqst.2023.1134583 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

  20. [20]

    de Vega \ and\ author D

    author author I. de Vega \ and\ author D. Alonso ,\ title title Dynamics of non-Markovian open quantum systems ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.89.015001 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 89 ,\ pages 015001 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

  21. [21]

    author author D. D. \ Bhaktavatsala Rao \ and\ author G. Kurizki ,\ title title From zeno to anti-zeno regime: Decoherence-control dependence on the quantum statistics of the bath ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.83.032105 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 83 ,\ pages 032105 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

  22. [22]

    author author A. G. \ Kofman , author G. Kurizki ,\ and\ author T. Opatrn\'y ,\ title title Zeno and anti-zeno effects for photon polarization dephasing ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.63.042108 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 63 ,\ pages 042108 ( year 2001 ) NoStop

  23. [23]

    author author F. F. \ Floether , author P. d. \ Fouquieres ,\ and\ author S. G. \ Schirmer ,\ title title Robust quantum gates for open systems via optimal control: Markovian versus non-markovian dynamics ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/14/7/073023 journal journal New Journal of Physics \ volume 14 ,\ pages 073023 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

  24. [24]

    \ Li , author G.-C

    author author C.-F. \ Li , author G.-C. \ Guo ,\ and\ author J. Piilo ,\ title title Non-markovian quantum dynamics: What is it good for? ,\ https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/128/30001 journal journal EPL (Europhysics Letters) \ volume 128 ,\ pages 30001 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

  25. [25]

    Mu , author X

    author author Q. Mu , author X. Zhao ,\ and\ author T. Yu ,\ title title Memory-effect-induced macroscopic-microscopic entanglement ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.94.012334 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 94 ,\ pages 012334 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

  26. [26]

    Yu \ and\ author D.-W

    author author Z. Yu \ and\ author D.-W. \ Luo ,\ title title Many-body quantum state control in the presence of environmental noise ,\ https://doi.org/10.26421/qic23.11-12-3 journal journal Quantum Information and Computation \ volume 23 ,\ pages 937 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

  27. [27]

    Zhao , author J

    author author X. Zhao , author J. Jing , author B. Corn ,\ and\ author T. Yu ,\ title title Dynamics of interacting qubits coupled to a common bath: Non-markovian quantum-state-diffusion approach ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.84.032101 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 84 ,\ pages 032101 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

  28. [28]

    author author I. I. \ Arkhipov , author F. Nori ,\ and\ author i. m. c. K. \ \"Ozdemir ,\ title title Achieving the quantum fisher information bound in pseudo-hermitian sensors ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/qk5r-h851 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 136 ,\ pages 080802 ( year 2026 ) NoStop

  29. [29]

    Bao , author B

    author author L. Bao , author B. Qi , author D. Dong ,\ and\ author F. Nori ,\ title title Fundamental limits for reciprocal and nonreciprocal non-hermitian quantum sensing ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.103.042418 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 103 ,\ pages 042418 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

  30. [30]

    Bao , author B

    author author L. Bao , author B. Qi , author F. Nori ,\ and\ author D. Dong ,\ title title Exponential sensitivity revival of noisy non-hermitian quantum sensing with two-photon drives ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.023216 journal journal Phys. Rev. Res. \ volume 6 ,\ pages 023216 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

  31. [31]

    Garbe , author O

    author author L. Garbe , author O. Abah , author S. Felicetti ,\ and\ author R. Puebla ,\ title title Exponential time-scaling of estimation precision by reaching a quantum critical point ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.043061 journal journal Phys. Rev. Res. \ volume 4 ,\ pages 043061 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

  32. [32]

    Lecamwasam , author T

    author author R. Lecamwasam , author T. Iakovleva ,\ and\ author J. Twamley ,\ title title Quantum metrology with linear lie algebra parameterizations ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.043137 journal journal Phys. Rev. Res. \ volume 6 ,\ pages 043137 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

  33. [33]

    author author Z. H. \ Saleem , author A. Shaji ,\ and\ author S. K. \ Gray ,\ title title Optimal time for sensing in open quantum systems ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.108.022413 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 108 ,\ pages 022413 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

  34. [34]

    author author Z. H. \ Saleem , author M. Perlin , author A. Shaji ,\ and\ author S. K. \ Gray ,\ title title Achieving the heisenberg limit with dicke states in noisy quantum metrology ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.109.052615 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 109 ,\ pages 052615 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

  35. [35]

    author author M. H. \ Goerz , author E. J. \ Halperin , author J. M. \ Aytac , author C. P. \ Koch ,\ and\ author K. B. \ Whaley ,\ title title Robustness of high-fidelity rydberg gates with single-site addressability ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.90.032329 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 90 ,\ pages 032329 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

  36. [36]

    author author M. H. \ Goerz , author D. Basilewitsch , author F. Gago-Encinas , author M. G. \ Krauss , author K. P. \ Horn , author D. M. \ Reich ,\ and\ author C. P. \ Koch ,\ title title Krotov: A Python implementation of Krotov's method for quantum optimal control ,\ https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.7.6.080 journal journal SciPost Phys. \ volume 7...

  37. [37]

    author author M. H. \ Goerz , author S. C. \ Carrasco ,\ and\ author V. S. \ Malinovsky ,\ title title Quantum O ptimal C ontrol via S emi- A utomatic D ifferentiation ,\ https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2022-12-07-871 journal journal Quantum \ volume 6 ,\ pages 871 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

  38. [38]

    A differentiable programming system to bridge machine learning and scientific computing.arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.07587,

    author author M. Innes , author A. Edelman , author K. Fischer , author C. Rackauckas , author E. Saba , author V. B. \ Shah ,\ and\ author W. Tebbutt ,\ https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1907.07587 title A differentiable programming system to bridge machine learning and scientific computing ( year 2019 ) NoStop

  39. [39]

    Qin , author M

    author author S. Qin , author M. Cramer , author C. P. \ Koch ,\ and\ author A. Serafini ,\ title title Optimal control for Hamiltonian parameter estimation in non-commuting and bipartite quantum dynamics ,\ https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.13.6.121 journal journal SciPost Phys. \ volume 13 ,\ pages 121 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

  40. [40]

    author author C. W. \ Helstrom ,\ title title Quantum detection and estimation theory ,\ https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01007479 journal journal Journal of Statistical Physics \ volume 1 ,\ pages 231 ( year 1969 ) NoStop

  41. [41]

    Petz \ and\ author C

    author author D. Petz \ and\ author C. Ghinea ,\ title title Introduction to quantum Fisher information ,\ in\ https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814338745_0015 booktitle Quantum Probability and Related Topics \ ( publisher WORLD SCIENTIFIC ,\ year 2011 ) NoStop

  42. [42]

    Cram \'e r ,\ @noop title Mathematical methods of statistics ,\ Vol

    author author H. Cram \'e r ,\ @noop title Mathematical methods of statistics ,\ Vol. volume 26 \ ( publisher Princeton university press ,\ year 1999 ) NoStop

  43. [43]

    Yu ,\ title title Non-markovian quantum trajectories versus master equations: Finite-temperature heat bath ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.69.062107 journal journal Phys

    author author T. Yu ,\ title title Non-markovian quantum trajectories versus master equations: Finite-temperature heat bath ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.69.062107 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 69 ,\ pages 062107 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

  44. [44]

    Altherr \ and\ author Y

    author author A. Altherr \ and\ author Y. Yang ,\ title title Quantum metrology for non-markovian processes ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.060501 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 127 ,\ pages 060501 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

  45. [45]

    author author A. W. \ Chin , author S. F. \ Huelga ,\ and\ author M. B. \ Plenio ,\ title title Quantum metrology in non-markovian environments ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.233601 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 109 ,\ pages 233601 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

  46. [46]

    \ Tan , author W

    author author Q.-S. \ Tan , author W. Wu , author L. Xu , author J. Liu ,\ and\ author L.-M. \ Kuang ,\ title title Quantum sensing of supersensitivity for the ohmic quantum reservoir ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.106.032602 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 106 ,\ pages 032602 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

  47. [47]

    Wu , author S.-Y

    author author W. Wu , author S.-Y. \ Bai ,\ and\ author J.-H. \ An ,\ title title Non-markovian sensing of a quantum reservoir ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.103.L010601 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 103 ,\ pages L010601 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

  48. [48]

    Yang , author X

    author author X. Yang , author X. Long , author R. Liu , author K. Tang , author Y. Zhai , author X. Nie , author T. Xin , author J. Li ,\ and\ author D. Lu ,\ title title Control-enhanced non-markovian quantum metrology ,\ journal journal Communications Physics \ volume 7 ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-024-01758-8 10.1038/s42005-024-01758-8 ( year 202...

  49. [49]

    Liu , author H

    author author J. Liu , author H. Yuan , author X.-M. \ Lu ,\ and\ author X. Wang ,\ title title Quantum fisher information matrix and multiparameter estimation ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/ab5d4d journal journal Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical \ volume 53 ,\ pages 023001 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

  50. [50]

    Di´ osi, N

    author author L. Di\'osi , author N. Gisin ,\ and\ author W. T. \ Strunz ,\ title title Non-markovian quantum state diffusion ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.58.1699 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 58 ,\ pages 1699 ( year 1998 ) NoStop

  51. [51]

    Konnov \ and\ author V

    author author A. Konnov \ and\ author V. F. \ Krotov ,\ title title On global methods for the successive improvement of control processes ,\ @noop journal journal Avtomatika i Telemekhanika \ volume 10 ,\ pages 77 ( year 1999 ) NoStop

  52. [52]

    author author D. M. \ Reich , author M. Ndong ,\ and\ author C. P. \ Koch ,\ title title Monotonically convergent optimization in quantum control using krotov's method ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3691827 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 136 ,\ pages 104103 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

  53. [53]

    author author D. J. \ Tannor , author V. Kazakov ,\ and\ author V. Orlov ,\ title title Control of photochemical branching: Novel procedures for finding optimal pulses and global upper bounds ,\ in\ https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2326-4_24 booktitle Time-Dependent Quantum Molecular Dynamics ,\ editor edited by\ editor J. Broeckhove \ and\ editor L. La...

  54. [54]

    @noop title See supplemental material. Stop

  55. [55]

    Percival ,\ @noop title Quantum state diffusion \ ( publisher Cambridge University Press ,\ year 1998 ) NoStop

    author author I. Percival ,\ @noop title Quantum state diffusion \ ( publisher Cambridge University Press ,\ year 1998 ) NoStop

  56. [56]

    Yu , author L

    author author T. Yu , author L. Di\'osi , author N. Gisin ,\ and\ author W. T. \ Strunz ,\ title title Non-markovian quantum-state diffusion: Perturbation approach ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.60.91 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 60 ,\ pages 91 ( year 1999 ) NoStop

  57. [57]

    Vourdas \ and\ author R

    author author A. Vourdas \ and\ author R. F. \ Bishop ,\ title title Thermal coherent states in the bargmann representation ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.50.3331 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 50 ,\ pages 3331 ( year 1994 ) NoStop

  58. [58]

    author author E. A. \ Novikov ,\ title title Functionals and the random-force method in turbulence theory ,\ @noop journal journal Sov. Phys. JETP \ volume 20 ,\ pages 1290 ( year 1965 ) NoStop

  59. [59]

    author author H. Cram \'e r ,\ title title A contribution to the theory of statistical estimation ,\ https://doi.org/10.1080/03461238.1946.10419631 journal journal Scandinavian Actuarial Journal \ volume 1946 ,\ pages 85 ( year 1946 ) NoStop