Simple approximations of some statistical functions
Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 06:17 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Simple approximation expressions are proposed for the quantiles of the inverse normal distribution, Student's t-distribution, and outlier rejection criterion.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
For the inverse normal distribution, the Student's t-distribution, and the criterion for rejecting outliers, simple approximation expressions are proposed for the quantiles, which are accurate enough for most practical applications when testing statistical hypotheses.
What carries the argument
Simple closed-form approximation expressions for the quantiles of the inverse normal, Student's t, and outlier rejection distributions.
Load-bearing premise
That the proposed simple expressions provide sufficient accuracy for most practical uses in hypothesis testing without needing precise error specifications or broad validation.
What would settle it
Direct numerical comparison of the approximated quantiles against exact values at standard significance levels such as 0.05 or 0.01, checking whether deviations stay small enough for routine use.
Figures
read the original abstract
Possibilities are considered to simplify the computation of several statistical functions used to test statistical hypotheses when processing observations: the inverse normal distribution, the Student's t-distribution, and the criterion for rejecting outliers. For these three cases, simple approximation expressions are proposed for the quantiles of these statistical distributions, which are accurate enough for most practical applications.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript proposes simple approximation expressions for the quantiles of the inverse normal distribution, the Student's t-distribution, and the outlier rejection criterion. These are intended to simplify computations in statistical hypothesis testing when processing observations, with the assertion that the approximations are accurate enough for most practical applications.
Significance. If the approximations prove accurate within usable tolerances over relevant parameter ranges, they could offer practical value for quick statistical tests in data-intensive fields such as astro-ph.IM. However, the lack of any quantitative error analysis or validation means the claimed utility cannot be assessed and the work does not yet advance the state of practical methods.
major comments (1)
- [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the proposed approximations 'are accurate enough for most practical applications' is unsupported by any quantitative evidence. No maximum absolute or relative errors, no tested intervals for probability levels or degrees of freedom, and no comparisons to exact references (e.g., numerical inversion or standard libraries) are provided.
minor comments (1)
- The explicit functional forms of the three approximations should be stated clearly in the abstract or a dedicated section so readers can evaluate them without needing the full derivation.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the constructive feedback. We agree that quantitative validation is necessary to support the practical utility of the approximations and will revise the manuscript to include it.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the proposed approximations 'are accurate enough for most practical applications' is unsupported by any quantitative evidence. No maximum absolute or relative errors, no tested intervals for probability levels or degrees of freedom, and no comparisons to exact references (e.g., numerical inversion or standard libraries) are provided.
Authors: We acknowledge that the manuscript as submitted provides no explicit quantitative error analysis or comparisons to exact values. In the revised version we will add a new section (or appendix) presenting maximum absolute and relative errors for each approximation. This will cover the relevant ranges: probability levels from 0.9 to 0.999 for the normal and outlier criteria, and degrees of freedom from 1 to 100 (plus the limiting case) for the t-distribution. Errors will be computed against reference values obtained from standard numerical inversion routines and libraries (e.g., SciPy or R). We will also state the intervals over which the stated accuracy holds. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No circularity in proposed statistical approximations
full rationale
The manuscript proposes simple closed-form approximations for quantiles of the inverse normal distribution, Student's t-distribution, and an outlier rejection criterion. No derivation chain, fitting procedure, or self-citation is presented that reduces any claimed result to its own inputs by construction. The approximations are introduced directly as practical simplifications whose accuracy is asserted for most applications; this assertion does not rely on re-using fitted parameters as predictions or on uniqueness theorems imported from the author's prior work. The paper therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks and exhibits no load-bearing circular steps.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
, " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline
ENTRY address archive author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type url volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'before.all ...
-
[2]
" write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION add.period duplicate empty 'skip "." * add.blank if FUNCTION if.digit duplicate "0" = swap duplicate "1" = swap duplicate "2" = swap duplicate "3" = swap duplicate "4" = swap duplicate "5" = swap duplicate "6" = swap duplicate "7" = swap duplicate "8" = swap "9" = or or or or or or or or or FUNCTION ...
-
[3]
Bol'shev LN, Smirnov NV (1983) Tables of mathematical statistics . Moscow: Nauka (in Russian)
work page 1983
-
[4]
Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 17:415--417
Brophy AL (1985) Approximation of the inverse normal distribution function . Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 17:415--417
work page 1985
-
[5]
Sov Astron Circ 1555:33--34 (in Russian)
Malkin ZM (1993 a ) On rejecting outliers . Sov Astron Circ 1555:33--34 (in Russian)
work page 1993
-
[6]
Sov Astron Circ 1554:43 (in Russian)
Malkin ZM (1993 b ) Simple computation of t-distribution percentage points . Sov Astron Circ 1554:43 (in Russian)
work page 1993
-
[7]
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C (Applied Statistics) 23:96--97
Odeh RE, Evans JO (1974) Algorithm AS 70: The percentage points of the normal distribution . Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C (Applied Statistics) 23:96--97
work page 1974
- [8]
-
[9]
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C (Applied Statistics) 37:477--484
Wichura MJ (1988) Algorithm AS 241: The percentage points of the normal distribution . Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C (Applied Statistics) 37:477--484
work page 1988
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.