pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.17372 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-19 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex

Probes for CP Violation in B Decays at the FCC: A Theorist's Perspective

Robert Fleischer This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 05:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-ex
keywords CP violationB meson decaysFCCquark-flavour sectornon-leptonic decaysrare decaysHL-LHCBelle II
0
0 comments X

The pith

The FCC offers new opportunities to probe CP violation through non-leptonic and rare B meson decays.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper surveys a range of CP violation measurements in B meson decays that can explore the quark-flavour sector. It focuses on non-leptonic decays alongside rare decays as promising channels. These studies would extend beyond the reach of the HL-LHC and Belle II once those programs conclude. A sympathetic reader would see value in the potential for higher precision and new observables that could test the Standard Model or hint at physics beyond it.

Core claim

CP violation offers powerful probes to explore the quark-flavour sector, where decays of B mesons have been key players since decades. A variety of probes ranging from non-leptonic to rare B decays offer exciting opportunities at the FCC in the era after the HL-LHC and Belle II.

What carries the argument

Probes of CP violation in B decays, ranging from non-leptonic to rare decays, that can be measured with high precision at a future collider.

If this is right

  • Non-leptonic B decays can be studied with significantly improved statistics and precision compared to current facilities.
  • Rare B decays become accessible as additional channels for CP violation measurements.
  • These measurements would allow a more complete exploration of the quark-flavour sector than possible at the HL-LHC or Belle II.
  • New physics contributions to CP violation could be constrained or discovered through the combined set of observables.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Detector design choices at the FCC could be optimized specifically to capture the B decay modes highlighted here.
  • If the FCC is delayed, the theoretical case could be adapted to motivate similar B-physics programs at other proposed colliders.
  • The emphasis on both non-leptonic and rare modes suggests that combined analyses of multiple decay classes will be needed to fully exploit the data.

Load-bearing premise

The FCC will be constructed and operated after the HL-LHC era with enough luminosity and detector performance to carry out the high-precision measurements on non-leptonic and rare B decays.

What would settle it

The central claim would be falsified if the FCC is never built or if its delivered luminosity and detector performance prove insufficient to achieve the required precision on the discussed CP violation observables in B decays.

read the original abstract

CP violation offers powerful probes to explore the quark-flavour sector, where decays of B mesons have been key players since decades. I discuss a variety of probes ranging from non-leptonic to rare B decays, offering exciting opportunities at the FCC in the era after the HL-LHC and Belle II.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript offers a theorist's perspective on CP violation in B meson decays as probes for the quark-flavour sector. It surveys a range of non-leptonic and rare B decays and argues that these channels present exciting measurement opportunities at the Future Circular Collider (FCC) in the post-HL-LHC and Belle II era.

Significance. If the FCC is constructed and achieves the assumed luminosity and detector performance, the perspective could usefully inform experimental priorities for flavour physics by connecting established B-decay results to future collider capabilities. The paper synthesizes known physics without introducing new derivations, quantitative predictions, or machine-checked results, so its primary contribution is in highlighting conditional prospects rather than resolving open questions.

minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract is concise but would benefit from naming one or two concrete decay channels or observables (e.g., a specific non-leptonic mode or rare decay) to give readers an immediate sense of the discussed probes.
  2. A short discussion of the luminosity, vertexing, or particle-identification requirements at the FCC would make the feasibility claims more concrete and proportionate to the central assertion of 'exciting opportunities'.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their review of our manuscript and for recommending minor revision. The referee's summary accurately captures the scope of the work as a theorist's perspective highlighting opportunities for CP violation probes in B decays at the FCC. No specific major comments were provided in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in this perspective paper

full rationale

This is a theorist's perspective paper discussing established CP-violation probes in B-meson decays and their potential at a future FCC, without any new derivations, equations, or quantitative predictions. The central claims rest on prior experimental and theoretical knowledge in the field rather than internal fits or self-referential reductions. The FCC construction premise is stated explicitly as a conditional scenario, not derived or smuggled in. No load-bearing steps reduce to the paper's own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced in the abstract; the text relies on established concepts in flavor physics.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5328 in / 944 out tokens · 33021 ms · 2026-05-10T05:51:30.432778+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

28 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Svjetlana Fajfer, these proceedings

    work page

  2. [2]

    Fleischer, Eur

    R. Fleischer, Eur. Phys. J. ST233(2024) no.2, 391-408 doi:10.1140/epjs/s11734-024- 01127-0 [arXiv:2402.00710 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjs/s11734-024- 2024

  3. [3]

    Heavy-quark opportunities and challenges at FCC-ee

    S. Monteil and G. Wilkinson, Eur. Phys. J. Plus136(2021) no.8, 837 doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01814-0 [arXiv:2106.01259 [hep-ex]]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01814-0 2021

  4. [4]

    de Blas,et al.doi:10.23731/CYRM-2025-008 [arXiv:2511.03883 [hep-ex]]

    J. de Blas,et al.doi:10.23731/CYRM-2025-008 [arXiv:2511.03883 [hep-ex]]

    work page doi:10.23731/cyrm-2025-008 2025

  5. [5]

    De Bruyn, R

    K. De Bruyn, R. Fleischer, E. Malami and P. van Vliet, J. Phys. G50(2023) no.4, 045003 doi:10.1088/1361-6471/acab1d [arXiv:2208.14910 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6471/acab1d 2023

  6. [6]

    Fleischer, Int

    R. Fleischer, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A12(1997), 2459-2522 doi:10.1142/S0217751X97001432 [arXiv:hep-ph/9612446 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x97001432 1997

  7. [7]

    Fleischer, Eur

    R. Fleischer, Eur. Phys. J. C10(1999), 299-306 doi:10.1007/s100529900099 [arXiv:hep- ph/9903455 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1007/s100529900099 1999

  8. [8]

    De Bruyn, R

    K. De Bruyn, R. Fleischer and E. Malami, Eur. Phys. J. C86(2026) no.3, 215 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-026-15401-z [arXiv:2505.06102 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-026-15401-z 2026

  9. [9]

    Malami, these proceedings

    E. Malami, these proceedings

    work page

  10. [10]

    Fleischer, S

    R. Fleischer, S. J¨ ager, D. Pirjol and J. Zupan, Phys. Rev. D78(2008), 111501 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.78.111501 [arXiv:0806.2900 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.78.111501 2008

  11. [11]

    Fleischer, R

    R. Fleischer, R. Jaarsma, E. Malami and K. K. Vos, Eur. Phys. J. C78(2018) no.11, 943 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6397-5 [arXiv:1806.08783 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6397-5 2018

  12. [12]

    Allanach, these proceedings

    B. Allanach, these proceedings

    work page

  13. [13]

    Kehagias, K

    R. Fleischer and T. Mannel, Phys. Lett. B511(2001), 240-250 doi:10.1016/S0370- 2693(01)00648-7 [arXiv:hep-ph/0103121 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1016/s0370- 2001

  14. [14]

    Fleischer, J

    R. Fleischer, J. Groot and K. K. Vos, arXiv:2603.13139 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  15. [15]

    Aleksan, I

    R. Aleksan, I. Dunietz and B. Kayser, Z. Phys. C54(1992), 653-660 doi:10.1007/BF01559494

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01559494 1992

  16. [16]

    Fleischer, Nucl

    R. Fleischer, Nucl. Phys. B671(2003), 459-482 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2003.08.010 [arXiv:hep-ph/0304027 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2003.08.010 2003

  17. [17]

    Severi, C

    R. Fleischer and E. Malami, Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) no.5, 420 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052- 023-11588-7 [arXiv:2110.04240 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052- 2023

  18. [18]

    Fleischer and E

    R. Fleischer and E. Malami, Phys. Rev. D106(2022) no.5, 056004 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.056004 [arXiv:2109.04950 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.056004 2022

  19. [19]

    Brod and J

    J. Brod and J. Zupan, JHEP01(2014), 051 doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2014)051 [arXiv:1308.5663 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep01(2014)051 2014

  20. [20]

    J. Peng, M. Zhao, X. Wang, M. Ruan, H. Li and S. Chen, JHEP06(2025), 212 doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2025)212 [arXiv:2502.11172 [hep-ex]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep06(2025)212 2025

  21. [21]

    Fleischer, R

    R. Fleischer, R. Jaarsma and G. Tetlalmatzi-Xolocotzi, JHEP05(2017), 156 doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2017)156 [arXiv:1703.10160 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep05(2017)156 2017

  22. [22]

    De Bruyn, R

    K. De Bruyn, R. Fleischer, R. Knegjens, P. Koppenburg, M. Merk, A. Pellegrino and N. Tuning, Phys. Rev. Lett.109(2012), 041801 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.041801 [arXiv:1204.1737 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.109.041801 2012

  23. [23]

    Fleischer, E

    R. Fleischer, E. Malami, A. Rehult and K. K. Vos, JHEP09(2024), 183 doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2024)183 [arXiv:2405.10366 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep09(2024)183 2024

  24. [24]

    Fleischer, D

    R. Fleischer, D. G. Espinosa, R. Jaarsma and G. Tetlalmatzi-Xolocotzi, Eur. Phys. J. C 78(2018) no.1, 1 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5488-z [arXiv:1709.04735 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5488-z 2018

  25. [25]

    Fleischer, M

    R. Fleischer, M. van Hamersveld, T. Kortekaas, A. Rehult and K. K. Vos, JHEP01(2026), 048 doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2026)048 [arXiv:2504.16014 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep01(2026)048 2026

  26. [26]

    Fleischer, E

    R. Fleischer, E. Malami, A. Rehult and K. K. Vos, JHEP06(2023), 033 doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2023)033 [arXiv:2303.08764 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep06(2023)033 2023

  27. [27]

    Aaijet al.,First measurement of time-dependent C P violation in the flavor-changing neutral-current decay B0 →K 0 Sµ+µ−, arXiv:2603.13223, Submitted to Phys

    R. Aaijet al.[LHCb], arXiv:2603.13223 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv

  28. [28]

    Flavours at FCC Workshop, CERN:https://indico.cern.ch/event/1588013/

    work page arXiv