pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.17719 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-20 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.quant-gas· physics.atom-ph

Repeated weak measurements: watching quantum correlations evolve

Emine Altuntas , Ian B. Spielman This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 05:34 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.quant-gasphysics.atom-ph
keywords weak measurementsdynamical correlationsVan Hove functiondynamical structure factorBose-Einstein condensatephase-contrast imagingquantum backaction
0
0 comments X

The pith

A pair of weak measurements can extract the two-time density-density correlation function from a quantum gas by correlating fluctuations at one instant with their later evolution.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents a protocol that replaces active perturbation of a many-body system with two sequential weak quantum measurements. The first measurement registers density fluctuations of any origin; the second tracks how those fluctuations develop after a chosen time delay. Correlating the two outcomes directly yields the Van Hove function and, via Fourier transform, the dynamical structure factor. The approach is demonstrated on an atomic Bose-Einstein condensate using phase-contrast imaging and is shown to remain valid even when quantum back-action is isolated through post-selection. The method applies to any pair of observables that admit weak measurement.

Core claim

By correlating the outcomes of two time-separated weak measurements, where the first detects fluctuations of any sort and the second monitors their subsequent evolution, the two-time density-density correlation function (the Van Hove function) and its Fourier transform (the dynamical structure factor) are obtained directly, without external drive or strong perturbation of the system.

What carries the argument

Correlation of sequential weak measurements of density, realized via phase-contrast imaging, that converts measurement back-action into a probe of intrinsic dynamical correlations.

If this is right

  • Dynamical correlation functions become accessible for any observables that support weak measurement.
  • The technique bypasses the limitations of conventional strong measurements that destroy the state being probed.
  • Quantum back-action can be isolated and studied separately through Aharonov weak values.
  • The same protocol supplies the microscopic quantities that underlie neutron, X-ray, and Bragg scattering without performing scattering experiments.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method could be extended to continuous monitoring of non-equilibrium quantum dynamics in platforms where strong readout collapses the state.
  • Repeated weak probes might allow reconstruction of full quantum trajectories or open-system master equations from correlation data alone.
  • Application to spin or photon observables could link this approach to quantum optics protocols for measuring two-time coherence functions.

Load-bearing premise

The back-action introduced by the first weak measurement must leave the system's subsequent evolution unchanged in a way that still allows faithful extraction of the two-time correlation function.

What would settle it

If the Van Hove function extracted from the weak-measurement protocol on a known Bose-Einstein condensate deviates systematically from the independently calculated free-particle or Bogoliubov prediction when measurement strength or delay is varied, the protocol would be invalidated.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.17719 by Emine Altuntas, Ian B. Spielman.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: b, began with 87Rb BECs prepared in the |f = 2, mF = 2⟩ hyperfine state with ≈ 2.0 × 105 atoms confined in a crossed dipole trap. We studied dynam￾ics along the BEC’s ≈ 90 µm long-axis by imaging the atomic density using PCI at time t = 0 and again after a delay δt, yielding measurements M1 and M2. During each measurement, the BEC was illuminated for a dura￾tion tm = 16.4 µs [23] and, for each set of exper… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: a compares standard CCFs with QWV mea￾surements across a range of first-measurement strengths g, all at a fixed evolution time δt = 8 ms. The presence of correlation peaks at ≈ 10µm in both cases validates our QWV protocol. In the CCF data, the noise floor falls as g increases, eventually exposing a correlation fea￾ture comprising a peak at δx ≈ 10 µm nested between aperture-induced troughs. By contrast, t… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Experimental access to many-body quantum systems is often limited by measurement backaction, and key dynamical properties are typically obtained by perturbing a system and measuring its response. Here we replace this active paradigm with a minimally invasive protocol based on a pair of weak quantum measurements that leverages measurement backaction as a strength. By correlating time-separated measurements with the first detecting fluctuations -- of any sort -- and the second tracking their time evolution, our method directly measures dynamical correlation functions without external perturbation. We demonstrate this technique in an atomic Bose-Einstein condensate using phase-contrast imaging to obtain the two-time density-density correlation function known as the Van Hove function and, through its Fourier transform, the dynamical structure factor. Due to the role of spatial correlations in scattering, these quantities underpin neutron and X-ray scattering and atomic Bragg spectroscopy. This approach is broadly applicable, providing access to correlation functions between any pair of observables amenable to weak measurement, thereby going beyond the capabilities of conventional strong measurements. We further isolate the role of quantum backaction through Aharonov's post-selection-based quantum weak values.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes and demonstrates a protocol for measuring two-time dynamical correlation functions, specifically the Van Hove density-density correlation G(r,t) and its Fourier transform (dynamical structure factor), in a Bose-Einstein condensate. It uses a pair of weak phase-contrast imaging measurements: the first detects fluctuations and the second tracks their evolution, with the product of outcomes claimed to yield the unperturbed correlation directly. The approach is presented as minimally invasive, leveraging backaction as a feature rather than a limitation, and includes analysis via Aharonov weak values to isolate quantum backaction effects. The method is argued to be generalizable to other weakly measurable observables.

Significance. If the central claim holds after addressing backaction control, the result would provide a valuable experimental tool for accessing dynamical correlations in quantum many-body systems without external perturbations typical of scattering or strong-measurement protocols. The experimental implementation in a BEC and the connection to established quantities like the dynamical structure factor are strengths; the generality claim could broaden applicability if the weak-measurement formalism is rigorously validated.

major comments (2)
  1. [Theoretical framework (around the definition of the correlation function and weak-value analysis)] The central claim that the protocol extracts the unperturbed G(r,t) = <n(0,0)n(r,t)> requires an explicit derivation showing that back-action from the first weak measurement vanishes or is subtracted in the two-time correlation. The joint POVM for the pair of weak measurements and the resulting expectation value should be expanded to O(weakness parameter) to confirm no residual bias remains in the extracted Fourier transform.
  2. [Experimental results and data analysis sections] Experimental validation: the reported match between measured correlations and theoretical expectations must include quantitative controls for post-selection biases, imaging systematics, and finite weakness effects. Without these, it is unclear whether the data confirm the unperturbed correlation or include uncontrolled O(weak) contributions.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Methods] Clarify the notation for the weakness parameter and how it is calibrated in the phase-contrast imaging setup to allow readers to assess the regime of validity.
  2. [Discussion] Add a brief discussion of how the method extends to other observables beyond density, with a concrete example.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive major comments. We address each point below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the presentation of the theoretical framework and experimental validation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim that the protocol extracts the unperturbed G(r,t) = <n(0,0)n(r,t)> requires an explicit derivation showing that back-action from the first weak measurement vanishes or is subtracted in the two-time correlation. The joint POVM for the pair of weak measurements and the resulting expectation value should be expanded to O(weakness parameter) to confirm no residual bias remains in the extracted Fourier transform.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting the need for an explicit derivation. The manuscript already invokes the Aharonov weak-value formalism to argue that the measured two-time correlation corresponds to the unperturbed expectation value in the weak limit. To make this fully rigorous as requested, we will add to the revised manuscript an explicit expansion of the joint POVM for the pair of weak measurements to first order in the weakness parameter. This calculation shows that the back-action contribution from the first measurement enters only at higher order and does not bias the leading term, which recovers the unperturbed G(r,t). The same expansion confirms that the Fourier transform (dynamical structure factor) remains free of residual bias at this order. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Experimental validation: the reported match between measured correlations and theoretical expectations must include quantitative controls for post-selection biases, imaging systematics, and finite weakness effects. Without these, it is unclear whether the data confirm the unperturbed correlation or include uncontrolled O(weak) contributions.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative controls strengthen the experimental claims. The original manuscript discusses the weakness parameter and presents agreement with theory, but we will expand the data-analysis section in the revision to include explicit quantitative bounds. Using our existing calibration datasets, we will report estimates of post-selection bias, additional comparisons of imaging systematics across different probe strengths, and limits on finite-weakness corrections by direct comparison to the theoretical unperturbed G(r,t). These controls will confirm that any O(weak) contributions lie within the reported experimental uncertainties. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: experimental protocol derives correlation extraction from weak-measurement theory without self-referential fits or load-bearing self-citations.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that correlating two time-separated weak phase-contrast measurements directly yields the Van Hove function G(r,t) = <n(0,0)n(r,t)> and its Fourier transform. This follows from the joint POVM of weak measurements and the definition of the two-time expectation value in quantum mechanics, with back-action isolated via Aharonov's weak-value formalism (external reference). No equation reduces the extracted correlation to a parameter fitted from the same dataset, nor does any uniqueness theorem or ansatz rely on prior work by the same authors. The protocol is presented as an independent experimental observable whose output is compared against known scattering quantities rather than defined in terms of them. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard quantum measurement theory (weak measurements, back-action, post-selection) and the assumption that phase-contrast imaging realizes a weak measurement of atomic density. No new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Weak measurements can be performed on density without destroying the subsequent evolution of the many-body state in a controllable way.
    Invoked in the description of the protocol that replaces active perturbation with passive correlation of two weak measurements.
  • domain assumption The correlation between the two time-separated weak measurements equals the two-time density-density correlation function.
    This is the load-bearing mapping stated in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5483 in / 1511 out tokens · 34525 ms · 2026-05-10T05:34:34.518749+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    von Neumann,Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics: New Edition(Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2018)

    J. von Neumann,Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics: New Edition(Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2018)

    work page 2018

  2. [2]

    Rossi, D

    M. Rossi, D. Mason, J. Chen, Y. Tsaturyan, and A. Schliesser, Measurement-based quantum control of mechanical motion, Nature563, 53 (2018)

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    B. M. Terhal, Quantum error correction for quantum memories, Rev. Mod. Phys.87, 307 (2015)

    work page 2015

  4. [4]

    Hosten and P

    O. Hosten and P. Kwiat, Observation of the spin Hall effect of light via weak measurements, Science319, 787 (2008)

    work page 2008

  5. [5]

    Zhang, A

    L. Zhang, A. Datta, and I. A. Walmsley, Precision metrol- ogy using weak measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 210801 (2015)

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    G. P. Greve, C. Luo, B. Wu, and J. K. Thompson, Entanglement-enhanced matter-wave interferometry in a high-finesse cavity, Nature610, 472 (2022)

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    D. V. Freilich, D. M. Bianchi, A. M. Kaufman, T. K. Lan- gin, and D. S. Hall, Real-time dynamics of single vortex lines and vortex dipoles in a Bose-Einstein condensate, Science329, 1182 (2010)

    work page 2010

  8. [8]

    Zeiher, J

    J. Zeiher, J. Wolf, J. A. Isaacs, J. Kohler, and D. M. Stamper-Kurn, Tracking evaporative cooling of a meso- scopic atomic quantum gas in real time, Phys. Rev. X 11, 041017 (2021)

    work page 2021

  9. [9]

    M. A. Kristensen, M. Gajdacz, P. L. Pedersen, C. Klempt, J. F. Sherson, J. J. Arlt, and A. J. Hilliard, Sub-atom shot noise Faraday imaging of ultracold atom clouds, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Op- tical Physics50, 034004 (2017)

    work page 2017

  10. [10]

    M. B. Christensen, T. Vibel, A. J. Hilliard, M. B. Kruk, K. Paw lowski, D. Hryniuk, K. Rza˙ zewski, M. A. Kris- tensen, and J. J. Arlt, Observation of microcanonical atom number fluctuations in a Bose-Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 153601 (2021)

    work page 2021

  11. [11]

    J. G. Bohnet, K. C. Cox, M. A. Norcia, J. M. Weiner, Z. Chen, and J. K. Thompson, Reduced spin measure- ment back-action for a phase sensitivity ten times be- yond the standard quantum limit, Nature Photonics8, 731 (2014)

    work page 2014

  12. [12]

    M. A. Krivoglaz,Theory of X-Ray and Thermal Neu- tron Scattering by Real Crystals(Springer New York, NY, 1969)

    work page 1969

  13. [13]

    S. W. Lovesey,Theory of neutron scattering from con- densed matter(Clarendon Press, United Kingdom, 1984)

    work page 1984

  14. [14]

    Ozeri, N

    R. Ozeri, N. Katz, J. Steinhauer, and N. Davidson, Col- loquium: Bulk bogoliubov excitations in a Bose-Einstein condensate, Rev. Mod. Phys.77, 187 (2005)

    work page 2005

  15. [15]

    Meinel, V

    J. Meinel, V. Vorobyov, P. Wang, B. Yavkin, M. Pfender, H. Sumiya, S. Onoda, J. Isoya, R.-B. Liu, and J. Wrachtrup, Quantum nonlinear spectroscopy of single nuclear spins, Nature Communications13, 5318 (2022)

    work page 2022

  16. [16]

    M. R. Andrews, M.-O. Mewes, N. J. van Druten, D. S. Durfee, D. M. Kurn, and W. Ketterle, Direct, nonde- structive observation of a Bose condensate, Science273, 84 (1996)

    work page 1996

  17. [17]

    Enrico Fermi

    W. Ketterle, Bose-Einstein condensation in atomic gases, proceedings of the international school of physics “Enrico Fermi”, course CXL (IOS Press, 1999) Chap. Making, probing and understanding Bose-Einstein condensates, pp. 67–176

    work page 1999

  18. [18]

    Gajdacz, P

    M. Gajdacz, P. L. Pedersen, T. Mørch, A. J. Hilliard, J. Arlt, and J. F. Sherson, Non-destructive Faraday imag- ing of dynamically controlled ultracold atoms, Review of Scientific Instruments84, 83105 (2013)

    work page 2013

  19. [19]

    M. B. Plenio and P. L. Knight, The quantum-jump ap- proach to dissipative dynamics in quantum optics, Rev. Mod. Phys.70, 101 (1998)

    work page 1998

  20. [20]

    H. M. Wiseman and G. J. Milburn,Quantum Measure- ment and Control(Cambridge University Press, 2011)

    work page 2011

  21. [21]

    This formalism is only valid forφ≪1; a strong mea- surement can be modeled as the concatenation of many weak measurements

    work page

  22. [22]

    Aharonov, D

    Y. Aharonov, D. Z. Albert, and L. Vaidman, How the result of a measurement of a component of the spin of a spin-1/2 particle can turn out to be 100, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1351 (1988)

    work page 1988

  23. [23]

    To mitigate parasitic excitations that occur while the probe is applied, each measurement consisted of a pair of pulses of durationt m/2 separated by a well chosen small delay.[25]

    work page

  24. [24]

    Zernike, Phase contrast, a new method for the micro- scopic observation of transparent objects, Physica9, 686 (1942)

    F. Zernike, Phase contrast, a new method for the micro- scopic observation of transparent objects, Physica9, 686 (1942)

    work page 1942

  25. [25]

    Altunta¸ s and I

    E. Altunta¸ s and I. B. Spielman, Quantum back-action limits in dispersively measured Bose-Einstein conden- sates, Communications Physics6, 66 (2023)

    work page 2023

  26. [26]

    Altunta¸ s and I

    E. Altunta¸ s and I. B. Spielman, Weak-measurement- induced heating in Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 023185 (2023)

    work page 2023

  27. [27]

    As discussed in the methods, the largest resolution- limited measurement strength in our experiment isφ≈ 0.1, atg= 1.0

    work page

  28. [28]

    N. N. Bogoliubov, On the theory of superfluidity, J. Phys. (USSR)11, 23 (1947)

    work page 1947

  29. [29]

    The maximum 1D speed of soundc= p µ/(2m) was computed using the chemical potentialµ=h×0.8(1) kHz measured for this dataset

    work page

  30. [30]

    Altunta¸ s and I

    E. Altunta¸ s and I. B. Spielman, Self-Bayesian aberration removal via constraints for ultracold atom microscopy, Phys. Rev. Research3, 043087 (2021)

    work page 2021

  31. [31]

    Dressel, M

    J. Dressel, M. Malik, F. M. Miatto, A. N. Jordan, and R. W. Boyd, Colloquium: Understanding quantum weak values: Basics and applications, Rev. Mod. Phys.86, 307 (2014)

    work page 2014

  32. [32]

    Skinner, J

    B. Skinner, J. Ruhman, and A. Nahum, Measurement- 7 induced phase transitions in the dynamics of entangle- ment, Phys. Rev. X9, 031009 (2019)

    work page 2019

  33. [33]

    M. J. Gullans and D. A. Huse, Dynamical purifica- tion phase transition induced by quantum measurements, Phys. Rev. X10, 041020 (2020)

    work page 2020

  34. [34]

    C. Noel, P. Niroula, D. Zhu, A. Risinger, L. Egan, D. Biswas, M. Cetina, A. V. Gorshkov, M. J. Gullans, D. A. Huse, and C. Monroe, Measurement-induced quan- tum phases realized in a trapped-ion quantum computer, Nature Physics18, 760 (2022)

    work page 2022

  35. [35]

    J. M. Koh, S.-N. Sun, M. Motta, and A. J. Minnich, Measurement-induced entanglement phase transition on a superconducting quantum processor with mid-circuit readout, Nature Physics19, 1314 (2023)

    work page 2023

  36. [36]

    J. C. Hoke, M. Ippoliti, E. Rosenberg, D. Abanin,et al. (Google Quantum AI and Collaborators), Measurement- induced entanglement and teleportation on a noisy quan- tum processor, Nature622, 481 (2023)

    work page 2023

  37. [37]

    Szyniszewski, A

    M. Szyniszewski, A. Romito, and H. Schomerus, Univer- sality of entanglement transitions from stroboscopic to continuous measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 210602 (2020)

    work page 2020

  38. [38]

    J. T. Young, A. V. Gorshkov, and I. B. Spielman, Feedback-stabilized dynamical steady states in the Bose- Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Research3, 043075 (2021)

    work page 2021

  39. [39]

    Schuckert and M

    A. Schuckert and M. Knap, Probing eigenstate thermal- ization in quantum simulators via fluctuation-dissipation relations, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 043315 (2020)

    work page 2020

  40. [40]

    Kamenev, Many-body theory of non-equilibrium sys- tems (2005), arXiv:cond-mat/0412296 [cond-mat.dis-nn]

    A. Kamenev, Many-body theory of non-equilibrium sys- tems (2005), arXiv:cond-mat/0412296 [cond-mat.dis-nn]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2005

  41. [41]

    Altunta¸ s and I

    E. Altunta¸ s and I. B. Spielman, Direct calibration of laser intensity via Ramsey interferometry for cold atom imag- ing, Opt. Express31, 17893 (2023)

    work page 2023

  42. [42]

    Repeated weak measurements: watching quantum correlations evolve

    E. Altunta¸ s, R. G. Lena, S. Flannigan, A. J. Daley, and I. B. Spielman, Dynamical structure factor from weak measurements, Quantum Science and Technology 10, 035045 (2025). Supplementary Information for “Repeated weak measurements: watching quantum correlations evolve” I. FOURIER TRANSFORM CONVENTION There are many sensible options for discrete Fourier ...

    work page 2025