pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.18415 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-20 · ❄️ cond-mat.soft · cond-mat.stat-mech

Impact of Initial Charge Distributions on the Kinetics of Charged Particle Coagulation

Gustavo Castillo , Nicol\'as Mujica This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 03:45 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.soft cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords charged particle coagulationSmoluchowski equationelectrostatic interactionscharge distributionsMonte Carlo simulationheavy-tailed distributionscluster growthquasi-stationary states
0
0 comments X

The pith

Heavy-tailed initial charge distributions accelerate coagulation of charged particles at intermediate times.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors extend the Smoluchowski coagulation equation by modifying the Brownian collision kernel to include electrostatic interactions between charged clusters. They solve the resulting equation with stochastic Monte Carlo simulations that start from different initial charge distributions and net charges. The runs show that charge heterogeneity speeds or slows cluster growth at intermediate times depending on the distribution, with Cauchy-Lorentz heavy tails producing faster growth than Gaussian distributions, while long-time states become quasi-stationary and depend on net charge. These dynamics matter for predicting aggregation in aerosols, volcanic ash, and granular beds where particles carry charge.

Core claim

Extending the Smoluchowski equation with a charge-dependent collision kernel and solving it stochastically reveals distinct growth regimes: at intermediate times the initial charge distribution controls whether heterogeneity accelerates or delays aggregation, with heavy-tailed statistics promoting faster cluster growth, while the system relaxes to quasi-stationary states whose properties are set by the net charge.

What carries the argument

The charge-modified Brownian collision kernel that adjusts pairwise collision rates according to the electrostatic interaction between clusters of given charges and sizes.

If this is right

  • Long-time cluster size and charge distributions depend primarily on the overall net charge.
  • Heavy-tailed initial charge distributions produce faster aggregation than light-tailed ones such as Gaussian.
  • Charge heterogeneity can either enhance or suppress coagulation rates at intermediate times according to the starting distribution.
  • The same framework applies to coagulation modeling in aerosols, astrophysics, and fluidized granular beds.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Rare particles carrying extreme charges in heavy-tailed distributions appear to drive most of the accelerated growth.
  • If initial charge statistics can be prepared experimentally, aggregation rates in industrial or environmental settings could be tuned by design.
  • The quasi-stationary states may admit approximate analytic descriptions that could be checked against the simulations.

Load-bearing premise

Electrostatic interactions between clusters can be captured accurately by a simple modification of the classical Brownian collision kernel.

What would settle it

If laboratory experiments on charged particles with controlled Gaussian versus Cauchy-Lorentz initial charge distributions show no difference in intermediate-time growth rates, the claimed role of heavy tails would be falsified.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.18415 by Gustavo Castillo, Nicol\'as Mujica.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Time evolution of global quantities for neutral [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Panel (a) illustrates the characteristic time [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Cluster size distributions (left) and Probability Density Functions (right) of cluster charges at representative times [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Time evolution of charge distribution statistics for neutral (top row) and non-neutral (bottom row) systems: (a,c) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Size–charge correlations. Maps of cluster charge vs. cluster size at early (left) and late (right) times for the Cauchy– [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the kinetics of particle aggregation within the framework of the Smoluchowski coagulation equation, extending it to account for electrostatic interactions among charged clusters. Using a stochastic Monte Carlo implementation, we examine how different charge distributions and net system charge affect cluster growth dynamics. Electrostatic interactions are incorporated directly into the classical Brownian collision kernel, yielding charge-dependent modifications of the collision rates that may either enhance or suppress aggregation depending on the signs and magnitudes of the interacting charges. Our simulations reveal distinct regimes of growth: at intermediate times, charge heterogeneity accelerates or delays aggregation depending on the initial underlying charge distribution, while at long times the system tends toward quasi--stationary states whose properties depend on the net charge. Comparisons between Gaussian and Cauchy--Lorentz initial charge statistics highlight the role of heavy-tailed distributions in promoting faster cluster growth. These findings contribute to a unified understanding of coagulation kinetics in charged particulate systems, with potential implications for aerosol and astrophysical coagulation processes, volcanic ash aggregation, and clustering in industrial fluidized granular beds.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript extends the Smoluchowski coagulation equation to charged particles by modifying the classical Brownian collision kernel with a pairwise electrostatic factor derived from the two-body Coulomb problem. A stochastic Monte Carlo solver is used to simulate aggregation kinetics for different initial charge distributions (Gaussian versus Cauchy-Lorentz) and varying net charges. The central claims are that charge heterogeneity produces distribution-dependent acceleration or delay of growth at intermediate times, that heavy-tailed (Cauchy-Lorentz) statistics promote faster cluster growth, and that the system reaches long-time quasi-stationary states whose properties are controlled by the net charge.

Significance. If the kernel modification is valid, the work supplies a practical numerical route to explore how initial charge statistics shape coagulation in charged aerosols, astrophysical dust, volcanic ash, and granular beds. The explicit comparison of Gaussian and heavy-tailed distributions and the identification of net-charge-controlled stationary states are potentially useful. However, the absence of quantitative growth rates, error bars, convergence tests, or validation against analytic limits in the reported results reduces the immediate impact and leaves the robustness of the claimed regimes unclear.

major comments (1)
  1. [Model / collision kernel definition] The modeling step that augments the Brownian kernel K_Brownian(i,j) by a multiplicative electrostatic factor f(q_i,q_j) obtained from the isolated two-body Coulomb problem is load-bearing for every reported regime. For heterogeneous or net-charged clusters this mean-field pairwise correction omits many-body screening, trajectory correlations, and mobility changes that become pronounced with heavy-tailed charge distributions; no comparison to the underlying Fokker-Planck dynamics or to known analytic limits (constant-charge coagulation, screened Coulomb) is supplied to justify the approximation.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract presents only qualitative statements of the regimes and supplies no numerical values for growth exponents, stationary cluster sizes, simulation parameters, or error estimates, making it impossible for a reader to judge the magnitude or statistical significance of the reported effects.
  2. [Introduction / Methods] Notation for the initial charge distributions (Gaussian versus Cauchy-Lorentz) and for the net-charge parameter should be defined explicitly with the corresponding probability densities and parameter ranges used in the runs.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address the major comment regarding the collision kernel below, providing clarification on our modeling choices and indicating the revisions made to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The modeling step that augments the Brownian kernel K_Brownian(i,j) by a multiplicative electrostatic factor f(q_i,q_j) obtained from the isolated two-body Coulomb problem is load-bearing for every reported regime. For heterogeneous or net-charged clusters this mean-field pairwise correction omits many-body screening, trajectory correlations, and mobility changes that become pronounced with heavy-tailed charge distributions; no comparison to the underlying Fokker-Planck dynamics or to known analytic limits (constant-charge coagulation, screened Coulomb) is supplied to justify the approximation.

    Authors: We agree that our approach employs a mean-field pairwise electrostatic correction derived from the two-body Coulomb problem, which does not account for many-body effects, trajectory correlations, or mobility changes. This approximation is appropriate for dilute suspensions where pairwise interactions predominate, consistent with standard extensions of the Smoluchowski equation in the literature on charged particle coagulation. To strengthen the manuscript, we have added a discussion of these limitations in the revised version, along with a comparison to the constant-charge coagulation limit in which the electrostatic factor reduces to unity. We note that a full treatment via Fokker-Planck dynamics or screened potentials lies beyond the scope of the present population-balance study but is identified as a valuable avenue for future research. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: standard stochastic solver of charge-augmented Smoluchowski equation

full rationale

The paper implements a Monte Carlo solution of the Smoluchowski coagulation equation with electrostatic factors inserted directly into the Brownian kernel. No load-bearing step reduces a reported growth regime, acceleration for heavy-tailed distributions, or quasi-stationary state to a fit or self-definition of the input charge statistics. The central claims are numerical outputs from the stated model; the modeling assumption itself is external to the derivation chain and does not create a self-referential loop. No self-citation is invoked to justify uniqueness or to smuggle an ansatz. This is the normal case of an independent numerical study.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review performed on abstract only; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are extractable beyond the standard modeling assumptions of the Smoluchowski framework.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5472 in / 1273 out tokens · 45893 ms · 2026-05-10T03:45:11.891346+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Goldhirsch and G

    I. Goldhirsch and G. Zanetti, Clustering instability in dis- sipative gases, Physical Review Letters70, 1619 (1993)

    1993

  2. [2]

    Puglisi, V

    A. Puglisi, V. Loreto, U. M. B. Marconi, A. Petri, and 10 0 5 10 15 20 25 −200 −100 0 100 200 300(a) k Q 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500−30 −20 −10 0 10 20 30(b) k Q 0 5 10 15 20 25 −800 −400 0 400 800 (c) k Q 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 20 40 60 80 100(d) k Q FIG. 5. Size–charge correlations. Maps of cluster charge vs. cluster size at early (left) and late (...

    work page arXiv 1998

  3. [3]

    S. K. Friedlander,Smoke, dust, and haze : fundamentals of aerosol dynamics, 2nd ed., Topics in chemical engi- neering (Oxford University Press, New York, 2000)

    2000

  4. [4]

    B. A. Tinsley, R. P. Rohrbaugh, M. Hei, and K. V. Beard, Effects of image charges on the scavenging of aerosol par- ticles by cloud droplets and on droplet charging and pos- sible ice nucleation processes, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences57, 2118 (2000)

    2000

  5. [5]

    J. R. Royer, D. J. Evans, L. Oyarte, Q. Guo, E. Kapit, M. E. M¨ obius, S. R. Waitukaitis, and H. M. Jaeger, High- speed tracking of rupture and clustering in freely falling granular streams, Nature459, 1 4 (2009)

    2009

  6. [6]

    D. L. Schrader, K. Nagashima, S. R. Waitukaitis, J. Davidson, T. J. McCoy, H. C. Connolly, and D. S. Lauretta, The retention of dust in protoplanetary disks: Evidence from agglomeratic olivine chondrules from the outer solar system, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 223, 405 (2018)

    2018

  7. [7]

    Steinpilz, K

    T. Steinpilz, K. Joeris, F. Jungmann, D. Wolf, L. Bren- del, J. Teiser, T. Shinbrot, and G. Wurm, Electrical charging overcomes the bouncing barrier in planet for- mation, Nature Physics16, 225 (2020)

    2020

  8. [8]

    Wurm and J

    G. Wurm and J. Teiser, Understanding planet formation using microgravity experiments, Nature Reviews Physics 3, 405 (2021), 2302.07156

    work page arXiv 2021

  9. [9]

    Brown, C

    R. Brown, C. Bonadonna, and A. Durant, A review of volcanic ash aggregation, Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C45-46, 65 (2012)

    2012

  10. [10]

    C. P. Reeve, C. Williamson, E. Shelton, A. J. Stace, and E. Besley, Electrostatic aggregation of charged, polariz- able particles in extreme atmospheric environments, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A129, 7461 (2025)

    2025

  11. [11]

    Guo and H

    S. Guo and H. Xue, The enhancement of droplet colli- sion by electric charges and atmospheric electric fields, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics21, 69 (2021)

    2021

  12. [12]

    Mudiar, S

    D. Mudiar, S. D. Pawar, V. Gopalakrishnan, and E. Williams, Electric field enlarges raindrops beneath electrified clouds: Observational evidence, Geophysical Research Letters48, e2021GL093577 (2021)

    2021

  13. [13]

    Mudiar, A

    D. Mudiar, A. Hazra, S. D. Pawar, R. K. Karumuri, M. Konwar, S. Mukherjee, M. K. Srivastava, B. N. Goswami, and E. Williams, Role of electrical effects in intensifying rainfall rates in the tropics, Geophysical Re- search Letters49, e2021GL096276 (2022)

    2022

  14. [14]

    Shinbrot, K

    T. Shinbrot, K. LaMarche, and B. J. Glasser, Tribo- electrification and razorbacks: Geophysical patterns pro- duced in dry grains, Physical Review Letters96, 178002 (2006)

    2006

  15. [15]

    X. Ruan, M. T. Gorman, and R. Ni, Effects of elec- trostatic interaction on clustering and collision of bidis- persed inertial particles in homogeneous and isotropic turbulence, Journal of Fluid Mechanics980, A29 (2024)

    2024

  16. [16]

    Karner and N

    S. Karner and N. Anne Urbanetz, The impact of elec- 11 trostatic charge in pharmaceutical powders with specific focus on inhalation-powders, Journal of Aerosol Science 42, 428 (2011)

    2011

  17. [17]

    J. Xi, X. Si, and W. Longest, Electrostatic charge ef- fects on pharmaceutical aerosol deposition in human nasal–laryngeal airways, Pharmaceutics6, 26 (2014)

    2014

  18. [18]

    Bessler, S

    R. Bessler, S. Bhardwaj, D. Malka, R. Fishler, and J. Sznitman, Exploring the role of electrostatic deposi- tion on inhaled aerosols in alveolated microchannels, Sci- entific Reports13, 23069 (2023)

    2023

  19. [19]

    J. M. Harper, C. S. McDonald, E. J. Rheingold, L. C. Wehn, R. E. Bumbaugh, E. J. Cope, L. E. Lind- berg, J. Pham, Y.-H. Kim, J. Dufek, and C. H. Hen- don, Moisture-controlled triboelectrification during cof- fee grinding, Matter7, 266 (2024)

    2024

  20. [20]

    Cocco, F

    R. Cocco, F. Shaffer, R. Hays, S. R. Karri, and T. Knowl- ton, Particle clusters in and above fluidized beds, Powder Technology203, 3 (2010)

    2010

  21. [21]

    Xu and J.-X

    J. Xu and J.-X. Zhu, Visualization of particle aggregation and effects of particle properties on cluster characteristics in a CFB riser, Chemical Engineering Journal168, 376 (2011)

    2011

  22. [22]

    Wang, Continuum theory for dense gas-solid flow: A state-of-the-art review, Chemical Engineering Science 215, 115428 (2020)

    J. Wang, Continuum theory for dense gas-solid flow: A state-of-the-art review, Chemical Engineering Science 215, 115428 (2020)

    2020

  23. [23]

    D. T. Moussa, M. H. El-Naas, M. Nasser, and M. J. Al- Marri, A comprehensive review of electrocoagulation for water treatment: Potentials and challenges, Journal of Environmental Management186, 24 (2017)

    2017

  24. [24]

    Lowell and W

    J. Lowell and W. S. Truscott, Triboelectrification of iden- tical insulators. II. theory and further experiments, Jour- nal of Physics D: Applied Physics19, 1281 (1986)

    1986

  25. [25]

    L. S. McCarty and G. M. Whitesides, Electrostatic charg- ing due to separation of ions at interfaces: Contact elec- trification of ionic electrets, Angewandte Chemie Inter- national Edition47, 2188 (2008)

    2008

  26. [26]

    H. T. Baytekin, A. Z. Patashinski, M. Branicki, B. Baytekin, S. Soh, and B. A. Grzybowski, The mo- saic of surface charge in contact electrification, Science 333, 308 (2011)

    2011

  27. [27]

    Apodaca, P

    M. Apodaca, P. Wesson, K. Bishop, M. Ratner, and B. Grzybowski, Contact electrification between identical materials, Angewandte Chemie International Edition49, 946 (2010)

    2010

  28. [28]

    I. A. Harris, M. X. Lim, and H. M. Jaeger, Temperature dependence of nylon and ptfe triboelectrification, Phys. Rev. Mater.3, 085603 (2019)

    2019

  29. [29]

    Grosjean, S

    G. Grosjean, S. Wald, J. C. Sobarzo, and S. Wait- ukaitis, Quantitatively consistent scale-spanning model for same-material tribocharging, Phys. Rev. Mater.4, 082602 (2020)

    2020

  30. [30]

    Grosjean and S

    G. Grosjean and S. Waitukaitis, Asymmetries in tri- boelectric charging: Generalizing mosaic models to different-material samples and sliding contacts, Phys. Rev. Mater.7, 065601 (2023)

    2023

  31. [31]

    Grosshans, G

    H. Grosshans, G. Ozler, and S. Jantaˇ c, Unifying same- and different-material particle charging through stochas- tic scaling (2025), arXiv:2505.23775 [physics.comp-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    Grosjean and S

    G. Grosjean and S. Waitukaitis, Single-collision statistics reveal a global mechanism driven by sample history for contact electrification in granular media, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 098202 (2023)

    2023

  33. [33]

    M. Sow, E. Crase, J. L. Rajot, R. M. Sankaran, and D. J. Lacks, Electrification of particles in dust storms: Field measurements during the monsoon period in niger, Atmospheric Research102, 343 (2011)

    2011

  34. [34]

    J. S. Gilbert, S. J. Lane, R. S. J. Sparks, and T. Koy- aguchi, Charge measurements on particle fallout from a volcanic plume, Nature349, 598 (1991)

    1991

  35. [35]

    S. R. Waitukaitis and H. M. Jaeger, In situ granular charge measurement by free-fall videography, Review of Scientific Instruments84, 025104 (2013)

    2013

  36. [36]

    S. R. Waitukaitis, V. Lee, J. M. Pierson, S. L. For- man, and H. M. Jaeger, Size-dependent same-material tribocharging in insulating grains, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 218001 (2014)

    2014

  37. [37]

    V. Lee, S. R. Waitukaitis, M. Z. Miskin, and H. M. Jaeger, Direct observation of particle interactions and clustering in charged granular streams, Nature Physics 11, 733 (2015)

    2015

  38. [38]

    Mujica and S

    N. Mujica and S. Waitukaitis, Accurate determination of the shapes of granular charge distributions, Phys. Rev. E107, 034901 (2023)

    2023

  39. [39]

    M. Lara, M. Flores, G. Castillo, S. Tassara, S. R. Wait- ukaitis, and N. Mujica, Particle size scaling of non- gaussian granular charge distributions, Phys. Rev. Mater. (2026)

    2026

  40. [40]

    Haeberle, A

    J. Haeberle, A. Schella, M. Sperl, M. Schr¨ oter, and P. Born, Double origin of stochastic granular tribocharg- ing, Soft Matter14, 4987 (2018)

    2018

  41. [41]

    M´ endez Harper and J

    J. M´ endez Harper and J. Dufek, The effects of dynam- ics on the triboelectrification of volcanic ash, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres121, 8209 (2016)

    2016

  42. [42]

    Emets, V

    E. Emets, V. Kascheev, and P. Poluektov, Simultaneous measurement of aerosol particle charge and size distribu- tions, Journal of Aerosol Science22, 389 (1991)

    1991

  43. [43]

    Teiser, J

    J. Teiser, J. Penner, K. Joeris, F. C. Onyeagusi, J. E. Kollmer, D. Daab, and G. Wurm, The growth of super- large pre-planetary pebbles to an impact erosion limit, Nature Astronomy9, 535 (2025), 2501.17508

    work page arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    V. Lee, N. M. James, S. R. Waitukaitis, and H. M. Jaeger, Collisional charging of individual submillimeter particles: Using ultrasonic levitation to initiate and track charge transfer, Phys. Rev. Mater.2, 035602 (2018)

    2018

  45. [45]

    Matsuyama and H

    T. Matsuyama and H. Yamamoto, Electrification of sin- gle polymer particles by successive impacts with metal targets, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications31, 1441 (1995)

    1995

  46. [46]

    Matsusaka, H

    S. Matsusaka, H. Maruyama, T. Matsuyama, and M. Ghadiri, Triboelectric charging of powders: A review, Chemical Engineering Science65, 5781 (2010)

    2010

  47. [47]

    C. Han, Q. Zhou, J. Hu, C. Liang, X. Chen, and J. Ma, The charging characteristics of particle–particle contact, Journal of Electrostatics112, 103582 (2021)

    2021

  48. [48]

    Andreotti, Y

    B. Andreotti, Y. Forterre, and O. Pouliquen,Granular Media: Between Fluid and Solid(Cambridge University Press, 2013)

    2013

  49. [49]

    Blum, Grain growth and coagulation, inAstrophysics of dust, Vol

    J. Blum, Grain growth and coagulation, inAstrophysics of dust, Vol. 309 (2004) p. 369

    2004

  50. [50]

    Schwaak, F

    J. Schwaak, F. F¨ uhrer, D. E. Wolf, L. Posorski, L. Bren- del, J. Teiser, and G. Wurm, High stability of charged particle clusters in protoplanetary disks, Astronomy & Astrophysics691, A127 (2024)

    2024

  51. [51]

    Becker, G

    T. Becker, G. V¨ olke, T. Steinpilz, F. C. Onyeagusi, J. Teiser, and G. Wurm, Tribocharged solids in proto- planetary discs: internal and external discharge time- scales, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical So- ciety533, 413 (2024). 12

    2024

  52. [52]

    Onyeagusi, J

    F.C. Onyeagusi, J. Teiser, and G. Wurm, Clusters of tri- bocharged dust aggregates as pebbles in protoplanetary disks, Astronomy & Astrophysics694, A78 (2025)

    2025

  53. [53]

    Nakajima and T

    Y. Nakajima and T. Sato, Calculation of electrostatic force between two charged dielectric spheres by the re- expansion method, Journal of Electrostatics45, 213 (1999)

    1999

  54. [54]

    E. B. Lindgren, B. Stamm, Y. Maday, E. Besley, and A. J. Stace, Dynamic simulations of many-body electrostatic self-assembly, Philosophical Trans- actions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences376, 20170143 (2018), https://royalsocietypublishing.org/rsta/article- pdf/doi/10.1098/rsta.2017.0143/1395602/rsta.2017.0143.pdf

    work page doi:10.1098/rsta.2017.0143/1395602/rsta.2017.0143.pdf 2018

  55. [55]

    M. V. Smoluchowski, Drei vortrage uber diffusion, brownsche molekularbewegung und koagulation von kol- loidteilchen, Z. Physik.17, 585 (1916)

    1916

  56. [56]

    Friedlander,Smoke, Dust, and Haze: Fundamentals of Aerosol Dynamics, Topics in chemical engineering (Ox- ford University Press, 2000)

    S. Friedlander,Smoke, Dust, and Haze: Fundamentals of Aerosol Dynamics, Topics in chemical engineering (Ox- ford University Press, 2000)

    2000

  57. [57]

    J. A. Wattis, An introduction to mathematical models of coagulation–fragmentation processes: A discrete deter- ministic mean-field approach, Physica D: Nonlinear Phe- nomena222, 1 (2006)

    2006

  58. [58]

    A. V. Ivlev, G. E. Morfill, and U. Konopka, Coagula- tion of charged microparticles in neutral gas and charge- induced gel transitions, Physical Review Letters89, 195502 (2002)

    2002

  59. [59]

    F. E. Kruis, A. Maisels, and H. Fissan, Direct simulation monte carlo method for particle coagulation and aggre- gation, AIChE Journal46, 1735 (2000)

    2000

  60. [60]

    Maisels, F

    A. Maisels, F. E. Kruis, and H. Fissan, Direct simula- tion monte carlo for simultaneous nucleation, coagula- tion, and surface growth in dispersed systems, Chemical Engineering Science59, 2231 (2004)

    2004

  61. [61]

    Liffman, A direct simulation monte-carlo method for cluster coagulation, Journal of Computational Physics 100, 116 (1992)

    K. Liffman, A direct simulation monte-carlo method for cluster coagulation, Journal of Computational Physics 100, 116 (1992)

    1992

  62. [62]

    T. A. Witten and L. M. Sander, Diffusion-limited aggre- gation, a kinetic critical phenomenon, Physical Review Letters47, 1400 (1981)

    1981

  63. [63]

    Zebel, Zur theorie des verhaltens elektrisch geladener aerosole, Kolloid-Zeitschrift157, 37 (1958)

    G. Zebel, Zur theorie des verhaltens elektrisch geladener aerosole, Kolloid-Zeitschrift157, 37 (1958)

    1958

  64. [64]

    N. A. Fuchs, R. E. Daisley, M. Fuchs, C. N. Davies, and M. E. Straumanis, The mechanics of aerosols, Physics Today18, 73 (1965)

    1965

  65. [65]

    Lianze, Z

    W. Lianze, Z. Xiangrong, and Z. Keqin, An analyti- cal expression for the coagulation coefficient of bipolarly charged particles by an external electric field with the effect of coulomb force, Journal of Aerosol Science36, 1050 (2005)

    2005

  66. [66]

    M. E. Crovella and M. S. Taqqu, Estimating the heavy tail index from scaling properties, Methodology And Computing In Applied Probability1, 55 (1999)

    1999

  67. [67]

    B. M. Hill, A simple general approach to inference about the tail of a distribution, The Annals of Statistics3, 1163 (1975)

    1975

  68. [68]

    S. M. Dammer and D. E. Wolf, Self-focusing dynamics in monopolarly charged suspensions, Physical Review Let- ters93, 150602 (2004), cond-mat/0404546

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2004

  69. [69]

    C.-C. Yang, A. Johansen, and D. Carrera, Concentrat- ing small particles in protoplanetary disks through the streaming instability, Astronomy & Astrophysics606, A80 (2017)

    2017

  70. [70]

    F¨ uhrer, J

    F. F¨ uhrer, J. Schwaak, L. Brendel, G. Wurm, and D. E. Wolf, Hybrid simulation method for agglomerate evolu- tion in driven granular gases, Astronomy & Astrophysics 694, A191 (2025)

    2025

  71. [71]

    Yoshimatsu, N

    R. Yoshimatsu, N. A. M. Ara´ ujo, G. Wurm, H. J. Her- rmann, and T. Shinbrot, Self-charging of identical grains in the absence of an external field, Scientific Reports7, 39996 (2017), 1608.03210

    work page arXiv 2017