arxiv: 2604.18627 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-18 · 💻 cs.CV · cs.RO

Recognition: unknown

Vision-Based Human Awareness Estimation for Enhanced Safety and Efficiency of AMRs in Industrial Warehouses

Maximilian Haug (1) , Christian Stippel (2) , Lukas Pscherer (3) , Benjamin Schwendinger (1) , Ralph Hoch (3 , 4) , Angel Gaydarov (1) , Sebastian Schlund (1)

show 9 more authors

Thilo Sauter (4) ((1) Fraunhofer Austria Research GmbH Vienna Austria (2) Computer Vision Lab TU Wien (3) Digital Factory Vorarlberg GmbH Dornbirn (4) Institute of Computer Technology Austria)

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 06:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV cs.RO

keywords human awareness estimationautonomous mobile robotsvision-based detectionwarehouse safety3D pose estimationhead orientationindustrial automationAMR navigation

0 comments

The pith

A vision system on AMRs uses a single RGB camera to determine if nearby humans are aware of the robot by estimating their pose and head direction.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a real-time method for autonomous mobile robots to estimate whether humans in a warehouse notice them. It combines 3D pose estimation from an RGB image with head orientation to check if the robot falls inside a person's viewing cone. This lets the robot move normally when a worker is aware and can share space safely, rather than always slowing down or detouring as if every person were an unaware obstacle. The pipeline is tested in a physics-based simulator, where it runs fast enough to support practical navigation decisions that balance safety and efficiency in mixed human-robot environments.

Core claim

Integrating state-of-the-art 3D human pose lifting with head orientation estimation from a single RGB camera ascertains a human's position relative to the AMR and their viewing cone to determine awareness of the AMR, with experimental results in NVIDIA Isaac Sim confirming reliable real-time detection that enables AMRs to adapt motion based on human awareness.

What carries the argument

3D human pose lifting combined with head orientation estimation to compute whether the AMR position lies within the human's viewing cone.

If this is right

AMRs can adapt their motion based on detected human awareness instead of defaulting to conservative slowing or detours.
Real-time detection of human positions and attention becomes feasible for industrial use.
Operational efficiency improves in warehouses by reducing unnecessary robot delays around aware workers.
Safety is supported through awareness-aware navigation in mixed human-robot traffic.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The method could extend to other shared spaces such as factory floors or loading docks where robots and people move together.
Combining the single-camera approach with additional sensors might handle cases where head orientation alone is ambiguous.
If the simulation results hold in real lighting and clothing variations, safety standards for collaborative AMRs could shift toward awareness-based rules.

Load-bearing premise

Head orientation and 3D pose estimates from one RGB camera view accurately reflect whether a human has noticed and will respond to a specific nearby AMR.

What would settle it

Real warehouse trials that record frequent cases where the system predicts awareness but the human still collides with or forces the AMR to stop, or predicts unawareness but the human avoids the robot without issue.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.18627 by (2) Computer Vision Lab, (3) Digital Factory Vorarlberg GmbH, 4), (4) Institute of Computer Technology, Angel Gaydarov (1), Austria, Austria), Benjamin Schwendinger (1), Christian Stippel (2), Dornbirn, Lukas Pscherer (3), Maximilian Haug (1), Ralph Hoch (3, Sebastian Schlund (1), Thilo Sauter (4) ((1) Fraunhofer Austria Research GmbH, TU Wien, Vienna.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Awareness–distance profiles in a 25 s encounter. Top: Three representative image pairs show the scene from the AMR’s camera (left in each pair) and the human’s perspective (right), captured at the time stamps marked (1)–(3). Bottom-left: Our pipeline’s continuous awareness score (blue). Peaks coincide with moments when the human glances toward the robot. Bottom-middle: Forward distance (orange) between the… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Ensuring human safety is of paramount importance in warehouse environments that feature mixed traffic of human workers and autonomous mobile robots (AMRs). Current approaches often treat humans as generic dynamic obstacles, leading to conservative AMR behaviors like slowing down or detouring, even when workers are fully aware and capable of safely sharing space. This paper presents a real-time vision-based method to estimate human awareness of an AMR using a single RGB camera. We integrate state-of-the-art 3D human pose lifting with head orientation estimation to ascertain a human's position relative to the AMR and their viewing cone, thereby determining if the human is aware of the AMR. The entire pipeline is validated using synthetically generated data within NVIDIA Isaac Sim, a robust physics-accurate robotics simulation environment. Experimental results confirm that our system reliably detects human positions and their attention in real time, enabling AMRs to safely adapt their motion based on human awareness. This enhancement is crucial for improving both safety and operational efficiency in industrial and factory automation settings.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper applies standard pose and head orientation estimation to AMR human-awareness detection in simulation only, without metrics or real-world validation.

read the letter

The main point to know is that the authors combine 3D human pose lifting and head orientation estimation from a single camera to determine if a person in a warehouse is aware of an approaching AMR, with all testing done in NVIDIA Isaac Sim. This could help robots act less conservatively around attentive humans. They handle the problem setup well by explaining the inefficiency of treating all humans as obstacles and proposing a viewing cone based on pose and head direction to infer awareness. The choice of a physics simulator for initial validation makes sense for safety-critical robotics work, and the pipeline uses off-the-shelf components in a logical way. The soft spots are in the lack of supporting data. No quantitative results appear in the abstract or description, such as detection accuracy, false positive rates for awareness, or comparisons to simpler methods. Everything rests on synthetic data, so issues like real lighting variations, occlusions from warehouse equipment, different worker clothing, or cases where head orientation doesn't mean attention to the AMR remain unaddressed. This makes the claim of reliable real-time detection hard to evaluate. A reader working on industrial AMR systems or human-robot interaction in factories would find the idea useful as a starting concept. It is not a core algorithmic advance but a targeted application that might spark follow-up experiments. I would send this to peer review. The topic is relevant and the basic approach is sound, but referees would likely require real-world testing and metrics before acceptance. That process could turn it into a more solid contribution.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims to introduce a real-time vision-based pipeline that uses a single RGB camera, off-the-shelf 3D human pose lifting, and head-orientation estimation to determine whether a warehouse worker is aware of a nearby AMR by checking if the AMR lies inside the worker's viewing cone. The entire system is validated exclusively on synthetic data generated inside NVIDIA Isaac Sim; the authors assert that the results confirm reliable detection of human position and attention, enabling safer and less conservative AMR motion planning.

Significance. If the quantitative performance and sim-to-real transfer hold, the approach could meaningfully improve throughput in mixed human-AMR environments by relaxing overly conservative obstacle-avoidance behaviors when awareness can be verified. The reliance on standard, publicly available pose and orientation modules is a practical strength that lowers the barrier to adoption.

major comments (3)

[Abstract and Experimental Validation] Abstract and Experimental Validation section: the assertion that 'experimental results confirm that our system reliably detects human positions and their attention in real time' is unsupported by any reported accuracy, precision, recall, latency figures, baseline comparisons, or error analysis. Without these numbers the central safety claim cannot be evaluated.
[Validation and Discussion] Validation and Discussion sections: all reported results are obtained inside NVIDIA Isaac Sim with no real-camera, real-lighting, or real-warehouse experiments and no quantitative assessment of the domain gap (illumination, clothing, motion patterns, partial occlusions). This directly undermines the generalization required for the safety and efficiency claims.
[Method] Method section (viewing-cone definition): the mapping from estimated head orientation to AMR-specific awareness is presented without ground-truth verification against alternative attention targets or failure-mode analysis; the assumption that head pose alone indicates awareness of the particular AMR is therefore untested.

minor comments (2)

[Figures] Figure captions and pipeline diagram would benefit from explicit labeling of each module (pose estimator, orientation estimator, cone computation) and indication of which components are off-the-shelf versus custom.
[Conclusion] The manuscript should include a short limitations paragraph acknowledging the synthetic-only evaluation and the untested sim-to-real transfer.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thoughtful and constructive review. The comments highlight important aspects of validation and assumptions in our work on vision-based human awareness estimation for AMRs. We address each major comment point by point below, clarifying our approach and indicating planned revisions to improve the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and Experimental Validation] Abstract and Experimental Validation section: the assertion that 'experimental results confirm that our system reliably detects human positions and their attention in real time' is unsupported by any reported accuracy, precision, recall, latency figures, baseline comparisons, or error analysis. Without these numbers the central safety claim cannot be evaluated.

Authors: We agree that the abstract would be strengthened by explicit quantitative support. The Experimental Validation section does include timing results and qualitative success rates from the synthetic trials (e.g., successful pose lifting and cone intersection checks across hundreds of frames), but we did not tabulate aggregate metrics such as precision/recall for awareness detection or direct baseline comparisons. In the revision we will add a dedicated metrics table reporting average position error, awareness classification accuracy, and end-to-end latency, plus a short comparison against a simple bounding-box baseline. This will make the reliability claims directly evaluable while remaining within the synthetic validation scope. revision: yes
Referee: [Validation and Discussion] Validation and Discussion sections: all reported results are obtained inside NVIDIA Isaac Sim with no real-camera, real-lighting, or real-warehouse experiments and no quantitative assessment of the domain gap (illumination, clothing, motion patterns, partial occlusions). This directly undermines the generalization required for the safety and efficiency claims.

Authors: We acknowledge that exclusive reliance on simulation limits direct claims about real-world generalization. Isaac Sim was chosen because it supplies pixel-perfect ground truth, controllable lighting and occlusion, and physics-accurate AMR dynamics—conditions that enable repeatable, safety-relevant testing that would be difficult and costly to obtain in a live warehouse. In the revised Discussion we will expand the limitations paragraph with a qualitative assessment of expected domain gaps (e.g., texture differences, motion blur, clothing variability) and will add a short subsection outlining concrete next steps for sim-to-real transfer, including planned use of domain randomization and real-robot data collection. We will also tone down absolute safety claims to emphasize that the current results demonstrate feasibility within a high-fidelity simulator. revision: partial
Referee: [Method] Method section (viewing-cone definition): the mapping from estimated head orientation to AMR-specific awareness is presented without ground-truth verification against alternative attention targets or failure-mode analysis; the assumption that head pose alone indicates awareness of the particular AMR is therefore untested.

Authors: The viewing-cone construction follows established practice in attention estimation literature, where head orientation serves as a reliable proxy for gaze direction when eye tracking is unavailable. The cone parameters (120° horizontal FOV centered on the lifted head pose) are drawn from standard ergonomic data on human visual fields. Nevertheless, we recognize that this remains an assumption. In the revision we will insert an explicit “Assumptions and Limitations” paragraph in the Method section that cites supporting studies on head-pose-as-attention, enumerates failure modes (e.g., peripheral awareness, divided attention, or prior knowledge of the AMR), and provides illustrative synthetic examples where the AMR lies outside the cone yet the simulated human still reacts safely. This will make the modeling choice transparent without requiring additional sensors. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved

Direct quantitative evaluation on real warehouse footage with live AMRs and workers, including measured sim-to-real performance drop, because the present study was conducted entirely in simulation and no real-world dataset was collected.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper describes an applied computer vision pipeline that integrates standard off-the-shelf 3D human pose estimation and head orientation techniques to define a viewing cone for AMR awareness. No mathematical derivations, equations, fitted parameters presented as predictions, or self-referential definitions appear in the text. Validation occurs via empirical testing in NVIDIA Isaac Sim rather than any reduction of outputs to inputs by construction. No self-citations are invoked as load-bearing uniqueness theorems, and no ansatz or renaming of known results is used to justify core claims. The central result is an engineering demonstration whose performance claims rest on external simulation benchmarks, not internal tautology.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the accuracy of off-the-shelf 3D pose lifting and head orientation modules plus the assumption that simulation results transfer to real warehouses. No new free parameters, axioms beyond standard computer-vision assumptions, or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption State-of-the-art 3D human pose lifting produces sufficiently accurate 3D positions and orientations for awareness inference
Invoked when the pipeline uses pose output to determine viewing cone relative to the AMR.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5568 in / 1363 out tokens · 50676 ms · 2026-05-10T06:30:42.349091+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

15 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

[1]

Human-aware robot navigation in logistics warehouses

M. A. Kenk, M. Hassaballah, and J.-F. Breth ´e, “Human-aware robot navigation in logistics warehouses.” inICINCO (2), 2019, pp. 371–378

2019
[2]

Proactive opinion- driven robot navigation around human movers,

C. Cathcart, M. Santos, S. Park, and N. E. Leonard, “Proactive opinion- driven robot navigation around human movers,” in2023 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, 2023, pp. 4052–4058

2023
[3]

Toward safe and efficient human–robot interaction via behavior-driven danger signaling,

M. Hosseinzadeh, B. Sinopoli, and A. F. Bobick, “Toward safe and efficient human–robot interaction via behavior-driven danger signaling,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 214–224, 2023

2023
[4]

Collision tests in human-robot collaboration: experiments on the influence of additional impact parameters on safety,

C. Fischer, M. Neuhold, M. Steiner, T. Haspl, M. Rathmair, and S. Schlund, “Collision tests in human-robot collaboration: experiments on the influence of additional impact parameters on safety,”IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 118 395–118 413, 2023

2023
[5]

Exploring social motion latent space and human awareness for effective robot navigation in crowded environments,

J. A. Ansari, S. Tourani, G. Kumar, and B. Bhowmick, “Exploring social motion latent space and human awareness for effective robot navigation in crowded environments,” in2023 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, 2023, pp. 1–8

2023
[6]

Yolov8: A novel object detection algo- rithm with enhanced performance and robustness,

R. Varghese and M. Sambath, “Yolov8: A novel object detection algo- rithm with enhanced performance and robustness,” in2024 International Conference on Advances in Data Engineering and Intelligent Computing Systems (ADICS). IEEE, 2024, pp. 1–6

2024
[7]

Rtmw: Real-time multi-person 2d and 3d whole-body pose estimation,

T. Jiang, X. Xie, and Y . Li, “Rtmw: Real-time multi-person 2d and 3d whole-body pose estimation,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.08634, 2024

work page arXiv 2024
[8]

Online super- vised global path planning for amrs with human-obstacle avoidance,

M. Indri, F. Sibona, P.-D. Cen Cheng, and C. Possieri, “Online super- vised global path planning for amrs with human-obstacle avoidance,” inProc. 25th IEEE Int. Conf. on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETF A), 2020, pp. 1783–1790

2020
[9]

An experimental human–robot collaborative disassembly cell,

J. Huang, D. T. Pham, R. Li, M. Qu, Y . Wang, M. Kerin, and R. Khalil, “An experimental human–robot collaborative disassembly cell,”Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 155, p. 107189, 2021

2021
[10]

Using human attention to address human–robot motion,

R. Paulin, T. Fraichard, and P. Reignier, “Using human attention to address human–robot motion,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 2038–2045, 2019

2038
[11]

A pipeline for estimating human attention toward objects with on-board cameras on the icub humanoid robot,

S. Hanifi, E. Maiettini, M. Lombardi, and L. Natale, “A pipeline for estimating human attention toward objects with on-board cameras on the icub humanoid robot,”Frontiers in Robotics and AI, vol. 11, p. 1346714, 2024

2024
[12]

Gaze detection as a social cue to initiate natural human–robot collaboration in an assembly task,

M. Lavit Nicora, P. Prajod, M. Mondellini, G. Tauro, R. Vertechy, E. Andr ´e, and M. Malosio, “Gaze detection as a social cue to initiate natural human–robot collaboration in an assembly task,”Frontiers in Robotics and AI, vol. 11, p. 1394379, 2024

2024
[13]

Collaborative robot control based on human gaze tracking,

F. Di Stefano, A. Giambertone, L. Salamina, M. Melchiorre, and S. Mauro, “Collaborative robot control based on human gaze tracking,” Sensors, vol. 25, no. 10, p. 3103, 2025

2025
[14]

[Online]

NVIDIA Corporation,NVIDIA Omniverse Isaac Sim Doc- umentation, 2024, accessed: 2025-06-10. [Online]. Available: https://docs.isaacsim.omniverse.nvidia.com/

2024
[15]

Openmmlab pose estimation toolbox and bench- mark,

MMPose Contributors, “Openmmlab pose estimation toolbox and bench- mark,” https://github.com/open-mmlab/mmpose, 2020

2020