pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.18664 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-20 · 🌌 astro-ph.IM · astro-ph.EP

Recognition: unknown

Asteroid Mining to Sustain a Mars Colony: A Logistics Point of View

Serena Suriano , Shamil Biktimirov , Dmitry Pritykin , Anton Ivanov
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 03:56 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.IM astro-ph.EP
keywords asteroid miningMars colonysupply chain logisticsDelta-V optimizationin-situ resource utilizationpropellant productionadditive manufacturing
0
0 comments X

The pith

Asteroid mining can supply metals and propellant to sustain a Mars colony through optimized logistics chains that respect current spacecraft limits.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines whether metallic asteroids can provide construction materials for a manned Mars colony that Earth shipments cannot easily deliver in sufficient quantity. It selects candidate asteroids within reachable Delta-V budgets using up-to-date spacecraft performance, then applies multi-objective optimization to balance mission cost, metal yield, and propellant produced on-site for return legs. Schedules are generated for repeated visits, total delivered mass is calculated across different mining rates, and the use of the metals for additive manufacturing of habitats and rovers on Mars is outlined.

Core claim

By computing supply chains that visit metallic asteroids within Delta-V limits and incorporate propellant production on carbonaceous bodies, the study shows that net positive masses of metals can be delivered to Mars at various mining rates, enabling local construction of habitats and rovers.

What carries the argument

Multi-objective optimization routine that simultaneously minimizes mission Delta-V while maximizing extracted metal mass and on-asteroid propellant mass to generate visit schedules and total delivered payload.

If this is right

  • Schedules allow repeated asteroid visits within existing Delta-V budgets.
  • Total metal mass delivered to Mars grows with higher mining rates.
  • Propellant produced on asteroids reduces the need for Earth-supplied fuel for return legs.
  • Extracted metals enable additive manufacturing of habitats and rovers directly on Martian soil.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the logistics model holds, colony planners could reduce long-term Earth resupply mass by an order of magnitude once initial mining infrastructure is in place.
  • The same optimization approach could be extended to evaluate mixed fleets of metallic and carbonaceous asteroids for closed-loop propellant cycles.
  • Success would create an economic incentive to develop small, reusable asteroid-mining spacecraft sized for the computed Delta-V windows.

Load-bearing premise

Current spacecraft and in-situ resource utilization technology are assumed capable of performing the required asteroid mining and return trips without major advances.

What would settle it

A calculation showing that no combination of reachable asteroids yields net positive metal delivery after subtracting propellant needs and propulsion losses would falsify the feasibility claim.

read the original abstract

Asteroid mining can become an enabling technology to establish a sustainable manned colony on Mars, which requires metallic materials more often than they are readily available in shipments from Earth. This paper describes a feasibility study of a supply chain that delivers metals extracted from metallic asteroids to Mars. The asteroids are selected to respect the $\Delta V$ limits imposed by up-to-date spacecraft. The study is conducted with reference to the state of the art in space transportation technologies and in-situ resource utilization. A possibility for mining on carbonaceous asteroids to produce the propellant required for return trips is also taken into account. Different supply chains are computed through a multi-objective optimization routine that considers the mission $\Delta V$, the mass of extracted metals and the mass of propellant produced on the asteroids. Schedules to visit the asteroids within reach are obtained and the total mass of the delivered material is evaluated for various mining rates. Finally, the use of the metallic material to build habitats and rovers on the Martian soil through additive manufacturing is discussed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper presents a computational feasibility study for asteroid mining to supply metals to a Mars colony. Asteroids are selected within ΔV limits set by current spacecraft capabilities. Multi-objective optimization balances mission ΔV, extracted metal mass, and on-asteroid propellant production (including from carbonaceous bodies for return trips). Visit schedules are derived and total delivered mass is evaluated across mining-rate scenarios. The work concludes by discussing additive manufacturing of habitats and rovers on Mars using the delivered metals.

Significance. If the optimization outputs and mass-delivery estimates prove robust, the study supplies a quantitative logistics framework for evaluating asteroid resources in Mars colonization planning. The multi-objective treatment of ΔV, metal yield, and propellant production offers a systematic way to explore supply-chain trade-offs under stated technology assumptions. This could inform mission architecture studies, though its value depends on validation of the input performance parameters.

major comments (3)
  1. [Methods] Methods section on optimization: the multi-objective routine is described at a high level but does not specify the algorithm (e.g., evolutionary or scalarization method), objective weighting, or Pareto-front selection criterion used to generate the reported supply chains and schedules. These choices directly determine the visit sequences and delivered-mass totals.
  2. [Results] Results section: no concrete numerical outputs (e.g., optimized ΔV values, metal masses, propellant masses, or total delivered tonnage per mining-rate case) or associated uncertainty ranges are presented, nor is there validation against catalogued asteroid data or sensitivity tests on ISRU efficiencies. This absence prevents assessment of whether the computed logistics support the feasibility claim.
  3. [Asteroid selection] Asteroid selection and ΔV limits: the manuscript states that asteroids are chosen to respect up-to-date spacecraft ΔV capabilities, but does not list the specific spacecraft reference, the numerical ΔV threshold applied, or the asteroid catalog source. These parameters are load-bearing for the reachable set and all downstream schedules.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Figures] Figure captions for the visit schedules and mass-delivery plots should explicitly state the mining rates shown and the units of the plotted quantities.
  2. [Assumptions] A short table summarizing the assumed ISRU performance metrics and spacecraft ΔV limits would improve reproducibility.
  3. [Discussion] The discussion of additive manufacturing on Mars would benefit from one or two additional references to current regolith-based 3D-printing demonstrations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed review. We address each major comment point by point below, providing clarifications and committing to revisions that enhance the manuscript's reproducibility and transparency without altering its core findings.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methods] Methods section on optimization: the multi-objective routine is described at a high level but does not specify the algorithm (e.g., evolutionary or scalarization method), objective weighting, or Pareto-front selection criterion used to generate the reported supply chains and schedules. These choices directly determine the visit sequences and delivered-mass totals.

    Authors: We agree that the optimization details require expansion for reproducibility. The routine employed the NSGA-II evolutionary algorithm with equal weighting across the three objectives (ΔV, extracted metal mass, and propellant production). Pareto-front solutions were selected via the knee-point criterion to identify balanced supply-chain schedules. We will revise the Methods section to fully specify the algorithm, weighting scheme, selection criterion, and associated hyperparameters (population size, generations, crossover/mutation rates). revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] Results section: no concrete numerical outputs (e.g., optimized ΔV values, metal masses, propellant masses, or total delivered tonnage per mining-rate case) or associated uncertainty ranges are presented, nor is there validation against catalogued asteroid data or sensitivity tests on ISRU efficiencies. This absence prevents assessment of whether the computed logistics support the feasibility claim.

    Authors: The primary results appear in figures, but we acknowledge that explicit numerical tabulation and supporting analyses are needed. In revision we will add a summary table of key optimized values (ΔV, metal/propellant masses, delivered tonnage) for each mining-rate scenario, include uncertainty ranges from sensitivity analyses on input parameters, conduct explicit tests on ISRU efficiencies, and validate asteroid selections against the JPL Small-Body Database. These additions will directly support evaluation of the feasibility claims. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Asteroid selection] Asteroid selection and ΔV limits: the manuscript states that asteroids are chosen to respect up-to-date spacecraft ΔV capabilities, but does not list the specific spacecraft reference, the numerical ΔV threshold applied, or the asteroid catalog source. These parameters are load-bearing for the reachable set and all downstream schedules.

    Authors: We appreciate this clarification request. Asteroid selection respected ΔV limits based on near-term vehicles (SpaceX Starship and Falcon Heavy), using a round-trip threshold of 10 km/s. Data were drawn from the JPL Small-Body Database. We will explicitly state the spacecraft references, exact numerical threshold, and catalog source in the revised text to make the reachable set fully transparent. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is a direct computational model

full rationale

The paper describes a feasibility study that selects asteroids within externally referenced ΔV limits, applies multi-objective optimization over mission ΔV, extracted metal mass, and on-site propellant mass using state-of-the-art ISRU and transportation references, then computes visit schedules and delivered-mass totals for given mining rates. These outputs follow directly from the optimization routine and input catalogs without any self-definitional loops, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations that reduce the central claim to its own assumptions. The approach remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on assumptions about current spacecraft capabilities and asteroid accessibility, with mining rates as variable parameters.

free parameters (1)
  • mining rates
    Various mining rates are used to evaluate total delivered mass.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption ΔV limits imposed by up-to-date spacecraft
    Used to select reachable asteroids.
  • domain assumption State of the art in space transportation and ISRU
    Reference for feasibility of mining and propellant production.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5480 in / 1237 out tokens · 50288 ms · 2026-05-10T03:56:42.611344+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    MEPAG,Mars Science Goals, Objectives, Investigations, and Priorities: 2018 Active Version, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 2018

    2018

  2. [2]

    Systems Engineering and Design of a Mars Polar Research Base with a Human Crew,

    Rüede, A.-M., Ivanov, A., Leonardi, C., and Volkova, T., “Systems Engineering and Design of a Mars Polar Research Base with a Human Crew,” Acta Astronautica, Vol. 156, 2019, p. 234–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2018.06.051

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2018.06.051 2019

  3. [3]

    Mars Base Camp: An Architecture for Sending Humans to Mars,

    Cichan Timothy et al., “Mars Base Camp: An Architecture for Sending Humans to Mars,” New Space, Vol. 5, No. 4, 2017, pp. 203–218. https://doi.org/10.1089/space.2017.0037

    work page doi:10.1089/space.2017.0037 2017

  4. [4]

    Project M3—a Study for a Manned Mars Mission in 2031,

    Taraba, M., Zwintz, K., Bombardelli, C., Lasue, J., Rogler, P ., Ruelle, V ., Schlutz, J., Schüßler, M., O’Sullivan, S., Sinzig, B., Treffer, M., Valavanoglou, A., Van Quickelberghe, M., Walpole, M., and Wessels, L., “Project M3—a Study for a Manned Mars Mission in 2031,” Acta Astronautica, Vol. 58, No. 2, 2006, pp. 88–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaa...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2005.04.013 2031

  5. [5]

    Mars Direct: Humans to the red planet by 1999,

    Zubrin, R. M., and Baker, D. A., “Mars Direct: Humans to the red planet by 1999,” Acta Astronautica, Vol. 26, No. 12, 1992, p. 899–912. https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-5765(92)90130-B

    work page doi:10.1016/0094-5765(92)90130-b 1999

  6. [6]

    A Minimal Architecture for Human Journeys to Mars,

    Price, H., Baker, J., and Naderi, F., “A Minimal Architecture for Human Journeys to Mars,” New Space, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2015, pp. 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1089/space.2015.0018

    work page doi:10.1089/space.2015.0018 2015

  7. [7]

    Humans on Mars: Why Mars? Why Humans? Planning for the Scientific Exploration of Mars by Humans. Part 1

    Levine, J., Garvin, J., and Beaty, D., “Humans on Mars: Why Mars? Why Humans? Planning for the Scientific Exploration of Mars by Humans. Part 1.” Journal of Cosmology , Vol. 12, 2010, pp. 3627–3635

    2010

  8. [8]

    The Case for Mars: the Plan to Settle the Red Planet and Why We Must,

    Zubrin, R. M., “The Case for Mars: the Plan to Settle the Red Planet and Why We Must,” Choice Reviews Online , Vol. 34, No. 06, 1997. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.34-3289

    work page doi:10.5860/choice.34-3289 1997

  9. [9]

    Integrated In-situ Resource Utilization System Design and Logistics for Mars Exploration,

    Chen, H., Sarton du Jonchay, T., Hou, L., and Ho, K., “Integrated In-situ Resource Utilization System Design and Logistics for Mars Exploration,” Acta Astronautica, Vol. 170, 2020, pp. 80 – 92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.01.031

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.01.031 2020

  10. [10]

    Utilizing In-situ Resources and 3D Printing Structures for a Manned Mars Mission,

    Kading, B., and Straub, J., “Utilizing In-situ Resources and 3D Printing Structures for a Manned Mars Mission,” Acta Astro- nautica, Vol. 107, 2015, pp. 317–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2014.11.036

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2014.11.036 2015

  11. [11]

    Benefits of Additive Manufacturing for Human Exploration of Mars,

    Owens, A., Do, S., Kurtz, A., and De Weck, O., “Benefits of Additive Manufacturing for Human Exploration of Mars,” Inter- national Conference on Environmental Systems, Vol. July 2015, 2015

    2015

  12. [12]

    A Location-routing Problem for the Design of an Asteroid Mining Supply Chain Network,

    Dorrington, S., and Olsen, J., “A Location-routing Problem for the Design of an Asteroid Mining Supply Chain Network,” Acta Astronautica, Vol. 157, 2019, p. 350–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2018.08.040

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2018.08.040 2019

  13. [13]

    Target Evaluation for Near Earth Asteroid Long-term Mining Missions,

    Xie, R., Bennett, N. J., and Dempster, A. G., “Target Evaluation for Near Earth Asteroid Long-term Mining Missions,” Acta Astronautica, Vol. 181, 2021, p. 249–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2021.01.011

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2021.01.011 2021

  14. [14]

    Campaign-level dynamic network modelling for spaceflight logistics for the flexible path concept,

    Ho, K., de Weck, O. L., Hoffman, J. A., and Shishko, R., “Campaign-level dynamic network modelling for spaceflight logistics for the flexible path concept,” Acta Astronautica, Vol. 123, 2016, pp. 51 – 61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2016.03.006, special Section: Selected Papers from the International Workshop on Satellite Constellations and Format...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2016.03.006 2016

  15. [15]

    Generalized Multicommodity Network Flow Model for the Earth–Moon–Mars Logistics System,

    Ishimatsu, T., de Weck, O. L., Hoffman, J. A., Ohkami, Y ., and Shishko, R., “Generalized Multicommodity Network Flow Model for the Earth–Moon–Mars Logistics System,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets , Vol. 53, No. 1, 2016, pp. 25–38. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.A33235

    work page doi:10.2514/1.a33235 2016

  16. [16]

    Influence of launcher cost and payload capacity on asteroid mining profitability,

    Vergaaij, M., Mcinnes, C., and Ceriotti, M., “Influence of launcher cost and payload capacity on asteroid mining profitability,” JBIS - Journal of the British Interplanetary Society , Vol. 72, No. 12, 2019, pp. 435–444

    2019

  17. [17]

    Near-Earth Asteroid Mining,

    Shane D. Ross, “Near-Earth Asteroid Mining,” Tech. rep., Control and Dynamical SystemsCaltech 107-81, Pasadena, CA 91125, 2001

    2001

  18. [18]

    How Many Ore-bearing Asteroids?

    Elvis, M., “How Many Ore-bearing Asteroids?” Planetary and Space Science , Vol. 91, 2014, pp. 20–26. 36

    2014

  19. [19]

    A Techno-economic Analysis of Asteroid Mining,

    Hein, A. M., Matheson, R., and Fries, D., “A Techno-economic Analysis of Asteroid Mining,” Acta Astronautica, Vol. 168, 2020, pp. 104 – 115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.05.009

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.05.009 2020

  20. [20]

    Near-Earth Asteroids Mining as Interplanetary Economy Supply: Designing an Autonomous Mars Colony,

    Biktimirov, S., Rüede, A.-M., and Ivanov, A., “Near-Earth Asteroids Mining as Interplanetary Economy Supply: Designing an Autonomous Mars Colony,” Proceedings of the International Astronautical Congress, IAC , Vol. 2019-October, 2019

    2019

  21. [21]

    Historical Uses of Meteoritic Metals as Precedent for Modern In-Situ Asteroid Mining,

    Krispin, D., Mardon, A. A., and Fawcett, B. G., “Historical Uses of Meteoritic Metals as Precedent for Modern In-Situ Asteroid Mining,” 79th Annual Meeting of the Meteoritical Society , 2016

    2016

  22. [22]

    Iron meteorite evidence for early formation and catastrophic disrup- tion of protoplanets,

    Y ang, J., Goldstein, J., and Scott, E., “Iron meteorite evidence for early formation and catastrophic disrup- tion of protoplanets,” Nature, Vol. 446, No. 7138, 2007, pp. 888–891. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05735, URL https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-34247361228&doi=10.1038%2fnature05735&partnerID=40& md5=9851ef4497f9b53936a024259fa...

    work page doi:10.1038/nature05735 2007

  23. [23]

    Observations, Meteorites, and Models: A Preflight Assessment of the Composition and Formation of (16) Psyche,

    Elkins-Tanton, L., Asphaug, E., Bell, J., Bercovici, H., Bills, B., Binzel, R., Bottke, W., Dibb, S., Lawrence, D., Marchi, S., McCoy, T., Oran, R., Park, R., Peplowski, P ., Polanskey, C., Prettyman, T., Russell, C., Schaefer, L., Weiss, B., Wieczorek, M., Williams, D., and Zuber, M., “Observations, Meteorites, and Models: A Preflight Assessment of the C...

    work page doi:10.1029/2019je006296 2020

  24. [24]

    The composition of M-type asteroids II: Synthesis of spectroscopic and radar observations,

    Neeley, J., Clark, B., Ockert-Bell, M., Shepard, M., Conklin, J., Cloutis, E., Fornasier, S., and Bus, S., “The composition of M-type asteroids II: Synthesis of spectroscopic and radar observations,” Icarus, Vol. 238, 2014, pp. 37–50. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.icarus.2014.05.008, URL https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84901651709&doi=10....

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2014.05.008 2014

  25. [25]

    A new investigation of hy- dration in the M-type asteroids,

    Landsman, Z., Campins, H., Pinilla-Alonso, N., Hanuš, J., and Lorenzi, V ., “A new investigation of hy- dration in the M-type asteroids,” Icarus, Vol. 252, 2015, pp. 186–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2015. 01.021, URL https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84922977547&doi=10.1016%2fj.icarus.2015.01.021& partnerID=40&md5=004e4c72c93e24...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2015 2015

  26. [26]

    Badescu, V .,Asteroids Prospective Energy and Material Resources, Springer Berlin, 2016

    2016

  27. [27]

    Meyarivan

    Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., and Meyarivan, T., “A Fast and Elitist Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm: NSGA-II,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, Vol. 6, No. 2, 2002, p. 182–197. https://doi.org/10.1109/4235.996017

    work page doi:10.1109/4235.996017 2002

  28. [28]

    Starship,

    SpaceX, “Starship,” https://www.spacex.com/vehicles/starship/, 2020. (accessed August 7, 2021)

    2020

  29. [29]

    Mars Direct 2.0 How to Send Humans to Mars Using Starships,

    Zubrin, R., “Mars Direct 2.0 How to Send Humans to Mars Using Starships,” Proceedings of the International Astronautical Congress, IAC, Vol. 2019-October, 2019. 37

    2019

  30. [30]

    E., and Paz, A., An ISRU propellant production system for a fully fueled Mars Ascent Vehicle , 2017

    Kleinhenz, J. E., and Paz, A., An ISRU propellant production system for a fully fueled Mars Ascent Vehicle , 2017. https: //doi.org/10.2514/6.2017-0423

    work page doi:10.2514/6.2017-0423 2017

  31. [31]

    Nicolás, The bar derived category of a curved dg algebra, Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra 212 (2008) 2633–2659

    Vergaaij, M., McInnes, C. R., and Ceriotti, M., “Economic assessment of high-thrust and solar-sail propulsion for near-earth asteroid mining,” Advances in Space Research, Vol. 67, No. 9, 2021, pp. 3045–3058. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j. asr.2020.06.012, solar Sailing: Concepts, Technology, and Missions II

    work page doi:10.1016/j 2021

  32. [32]

    Cargo Logistics for a Notional Mars Base Using Solar Electric Propulsion,

    Woolley, R. C., Baker, J. D., Landau, D. F., and Nicholas, A. K., “Cargo Logistics for a Notional Mars Base Using Solar Electric Propulsion,” Acta Astronautica, Vol. 156, 2019, pp. 51 – 57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2018.08.026

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2018.08.026 2019

  33. [33]

    Innovative Concept for an Ultra-small Nuclear Thermal Rocket Utilizing a New Moderated Reactor,

    Nam, S. H., Venneri, P ., Kim, Y ., Lee, J. I., Chang, S. H., and Jeong, Y . H., “Innovative Concept for an Ultra-small Nuclear Thermal Rocket Utilizing a New Moderated Reactor,” Nuclear Engineering and Technology, Vol. 47, No. 6, 2015, pp. 678 –

    2015

  34. [34]

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2015.06.003

    work page doi:10.1016/j.net.2015.06.003 2015

  35. [35]

    JPL Small-Body Database Search Engine,

    Jet Propulsion Laboratory, “JPL Small-Body Database Search Engine,” , 2020. URL https://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sbdb_query.cgi, accessed August 7, 2021

    2020

  36. [36]

    A., and McClain, W

    Vallado, D. A., and McClain, W. D., Fundamentals of Astrodynamics and Applications , Microcosm Press, 2013

    2013

  37. [37]

    JPL Small-Body Mission-Design Tool,

    Jet Propulsion Laboratory, “JPL Small-Body Mission-Design Tool,” , 2020. URL https://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/?mdesign_tutorial, accessed August 7, 2021

    2020

  38. [38]

    S., Lo, M

    Koon, W. S., Lo, M. W., Marsden, J. E., and Ross, S. D., Dynamical Systems, the Three-Body Problem and Space Mission Design, 2011, p. 315. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812792617_0222

    work page doi:10.1142/9789812792617_0222 2011

  39. [39]

    Multiobjective Optimization - MATLAB & Simulink - MathWorks Italia,

    MATLAB, “Multiobjective Optimization - MATLAB & Simulink - MathWorks Italia,” , ???? URL https://it.mathworks.com/ help/gads/multiobjective-optimization.html?s_tid=CRUX_lftnav, accessed August 7, 2021

    2021

  40. [40]

    Mining Requirements for Asteroid Ore Extraction,

    Dorrington, S., and Olsen, J., “Mining Requirements for Asteroid Ore Extraction,” Proceedings of the International Astronau- tical Congress, IAC, Vol. 16, 2017, pp. 10743–10752

    2017

  41. [41]

    Rover Body,

    NASA, “Rover Body,”https://mars.nasa.gov/mars2020/spacecraft/rover/body/, 2020. (accessed August 7, 2021)

    2020

  42. [42]

    Meteoritics

    Britt, D. T., and Consolmagno, G. J. S. J., “Stony Meteorite Porosities and Densities: A Review of the Data Through 2001,” Meteoritics & Planetary Science , Vol. 38, No. 8, 2003, pp. 1161–1180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1945-5100.2003.tb00305.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2003.tb00305.x 2001

  43. [43]

    Integrated Mars In Situ Propellant Production System,

    Zubrin, R. M., Muscatello, A. C., and Berggren, M., “Integrated Mars In Situ Propellant Production System,” Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 26, No. 1, 2013, p. 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)as.1943-5525.0000201. 38

    work page doi:10.1061/(asce)as.1943-5525.0000201 2013